{ "metadata": { "schema_version": 1, "generated_utc": "2026-10-15T08:55:28.907687+00:00", "generator_sha256": "1529c6ac80179531128f35ada1f1d98706da3c6c45655830c24a5d99e9c32c03", "dependency_lock_sha256": "f737f52976406368fc37e2b093eeb4560a26d981507d664e1d85e3bc5264436f", "source_run": "reports-whole-data/all100", "output": "analysis/all100", "source_questions": "questions/questions.jsonl", "question_count": 100, "answer_models": [ "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "openai/gpt-6-luna" ], "methods": [ "sql", "sql_streaming" ], "dataset": { "files": 6, "rows": 638067, "compressed_bytes": 6914044276, "unique_filing_ids": 431952, "within_file_duplicate_groups": 176333, "extra_duplicate_rows": 206115, "identical_checksum_duplicate_groups": 174704, "conflicting_checksum_duplicate_groups": 1629, "reference_filing_ids": 27, "reference_filing_ids_present": 27, "months": "January–June 2025" }, "settings": [ { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "reasoning_effort": "low", "temperature": 0, "role": "answer", "temperature_sent": true }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "reasoning_effort": "low", "temperature": 0, "role": "answer", "temperature_sent": false }, { "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "provider": "anthropic", "reasoning_effort": "low", "temperature": 0, "role": "judge", "temperature_sent": false } ], "run_parameters": { "max_tools": 8, "concurrency": 4, "cache_policy": "shared" }, "scope": "Full 100-question run; four model/strategy conditions. Raw originals remain immutable.", "metric_notes": [ "Mean correctness excludes unscored cases. Coverage-adjusted score includes missing as zero.", "Known API cost includes failed/finalization attempts when usage was returned. Unpriced errors remain unknown.", "Case cost includes its answer and judge; preflight is counted only in the run total.", "Tool requested/processed/dispatched/cache counts are distinct. See audit definitions.", "Model summaries pool both strategies; strategy rows separate them." ] }, "audit": { "expected_cases": 400, "result_files": 400, "scored_cases": 399, "failed_cases": [ { "task_id": "5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb", "question_id": "Q024", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "error": "Model requested tools during forced finalization" } ], "missing_cases": [], "unexpected_cases": [], "duplicate_cases": [], "api_attempts": 3441, "api_successful_attempts": 3437, "failed_http_attempts": [ { "tag": "19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd:agent:2", "call_id": "7da216bc183c4d929a33356864cfba88", "attempt": 1, "status_code": 500, "error": "HTTP 500: {'error': {'code': 'application_error', 'message': 'HTTP 599: Timeout while connecting', 'type': 'application_error'}}", "usage": {}, "requested_model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "requested_provider": "google-ai-studio", "request_file": "raw/7da216bc183c4d929a33356864cfba88.request.json", "response_file": "raw/7da216bc183c4d929a33356864cfba88.response.json", "retry_recovered": true }, { "tag": "29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358:judge", "call_id": "e1087fcce4584d8387d70e936758cf70", "attempt": 1, "status_code": 429, "error": "HTTP 429: {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 429, 'metadata': {'raw': 'anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 is temporarily rate-limited upstream. Please retry shortly, or add your own key to accumulate your rate limits: https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations', 'provider_name': 'Anthropic', 'is_byok': False, 'limit_source': 'upstream_provider_shared_pool', 'remedy_hint': 'Retry shortly, add your own provider key (https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations), or route to another provider with provider routing: https://openrouter.ai/docs/features/provider-routing', 'retry_after_seconds': 1, 'retry_after_seconds_raw': 1, 'headers': {'Retry-After': '1'}}}, 'user_id': 'org_2v7amPvBH6U161qxuAATjm39Zg3'}", "usage": {}, "requested_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "requested_provider": "anthropic", "request_file": "raw/e1087fcce4584d8387d70e936758cf70.request.json", "response_file": "raw/e1087fcce4584d8387d70e936758cf70.response.json", "retry_recovered": true }, { "tag": "c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd:judge", "call_id": "ca8785ba50fe43b7bb701cf938d1bb76", "attempt": 1, "status_code": 429, "error": "HTTP 429: {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 429, 'metadata': {'raw': 'anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 is temporarily rate-limited upstream. Please retry shortly, or add your own key to accumulate your rate limits: https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations', 'provider_name': 'Anthropic', 'is_byok': False, 'limit_source': 'upstream_provider_shared_pool', 'remedy_hint': 'Retry shortly, add your own provider key (https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations), or route to another provider with provider routing: https://openrouter.ai/docs/features/provider-routing', 'retry_after_seconds': 1, 'retry_after_seconds_raw': 1, 'headers': {'Retry-After': '1'}}}, 'user_id': 'org_2v7amPvBH6U161qxuAATjm39Zg3'}", "usage": {}, "requested_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "requested_provider": "anthropic", "request_file": "raw/ca8785ba50fe43b7bb701cf938d1bb76.request.json", "response_file": "raw/ca8785ba50fe43b7bb701cf938d1bb76.response.json", "retry_recovered": true }, { "tag": "223c156cffee35cf4d88f201:judge", "call_id": "953d792313c24b39896b449b07c01840", "attempt": 1, "status_code": 429, "error": "HTTP 429: {'error': {'message': 'Provider returned error', 'code': 429, 'metadata': {'raw': 'anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 is temporarily rate-limited upstream. Please retry shortly, or add your own key to accumulate your rate limits: https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations', 'provider_name': 'Anthropic', 'is_byok': False, 'limit_source': 'upstream_provider_shared_pool', 'remedy_hint': 'Retry shortly, add your own provider key (https://openrouter.ai/settings/integrations), or route to another provider with provider routing: https://openrouter.ai/docs/features/provider-routing', 'retry_after_seconds': 1, 'retry_after_seconds_raw': 1, 'headers': {'Retry-After': '1'}}}, 'user_id': 'org_2v7amPvBH6U161qxuAATjm39Zg3'}", "usage": {}, "requested_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "requested_provider": "anthropic", "request_file": "raw/953d792313c24b39896b449b07c01840.request.json", "response_file": "raw/953d792313c24b39896b449b07c01840.response.json", "retry_recovered": true } ], "metadata_http_attempts": 4, "metadata_http_failures": 0, "inference_requests_without_audit": [], "raw_checks": { "attempts_checked": 3441, "usage_matches_passed": 3441, "requested_model_matches_passed": 3441, "low_reasoning_passed": 3441, "provider_fallback_disabled_passed": 3441, "provider_only_matches_passed": 3441, "zero_temperature_when_sent_passed": 1639, "reported_provider_matched_passed": 3437, "actual_model_matches_raw_passed": 3437, "actual_provider_matches_raw_passed": 3437, "response_id_matches_raw_passed": 3437, "temperature_capability_respected_passed": 3441, "agent_initial_inputs_checked": 400, "question_only_initial_input_passed": 400 }, "raw_integrity_problems": [], "question_input_mismatches": [], "case_structure_problems": [], "judge_input_or_score_problems": [], "summary_recalculation_differences": [], "billing_recalculation_matches": true, "billing": { "known_usd": 7.950589285, "unknown_attempts": 4, "complete": false, "preflight_known_usd": 0.0001661 }, "resource": { "peak_memory_mib": 2048.0, "max_swap_bytes": 0, "memory_events": { "low": 0, "high": 0, "max": 3261, "oom": 0, "oom_kill": 0, "oom_group_kill": 0, "sock_throttled": 0 }, "wall_seconds": 3450.5451586300005 }, "recorded_sources_unchanged": true, "recorded_code_unchanged": true, "tool_calls_requested": 2715, "tool_outputs": 2714, "tool_errors": 311, "tool_error_categories": { "memory_limit_or_allocation": 86, "sql_schema_or_syntax": 132, "duplicate_filing_id": 80, "tool_budget": 6, "invalid_tool_arguments": 5, "other": 2 }, "most_common_tool_errors": [ { "error": "Duplicate filing ID in source", "count": 50 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"parsed_md\" was not found because the FROM clause is missing", "count": 33 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"company_name\" not found in FROM clause!", "count": 30 }, { "error": "Duplicate filing accession in source", "count": 30 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"file_id\" not found in FROM clause!", "count": 23 }, { "error": "malloc of size 646993472 failed", "count": 22 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"form\" not found in FROM clause!", "count": 20 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"form_type\" not found in FROM clause!", "count": 11 }, { "error": "Tool budget exhausted", "count": 6 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (598.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 4 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (568.1 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 4 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 1.0 GiB (328.0 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 4 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (480.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 4 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (476.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 3 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (594.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 3 }, { "error": "Binder Error: Referenced column \"filing_date\" not found in FROM clause!", "count": 3 }, { "error": "Binder Error: No function matches the given name and argument types 'strpos(VARCHAR, STRING_LITERAL, INTEGER_LITERAL)'. You might need to add explicit type casts.", "count": 3 }, { "error": "query() got an unexpected keyword argument 'file_id'", "count": 3 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (380.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 3 }, { "error": "Out of Memory Error: failed to allocate data of size 128.0 MiB (384.2 KiB/122.0 MiB used)", "count": 2 } ], "cases_with_tool_errors": 190, "cases_reaching_tool_budget": 199, "cache_hits": 524, "heuristic_review_cases": [ { "task_id": "1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5", "question_id": "Q053", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "correctness": 95, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02", "question_id": "Q059", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "correctness": 98, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4", "question_id": "Q076", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "correctness": 95, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6", "question_id": "Q076", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "correctness": 92, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "3e580c187c15e50815598e3a", "question_id": "Q076", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "correctness": 90, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6", "question_id": "Q053", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "correctness": 100, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0", "question_id": "Q020", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "correctness": 90, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff", "question_id": "Q085", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "correctness": 90, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08", "question_id": "Q083", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "correctness": 100, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2", "question_id": "Q059", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "correctness": 95, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." }, { "task_id": "f67cef7319817ef6179e509f", "question_id": "Q059", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "correctness": 97, "note": "Heuristic review only: short/structured SQL evidence or appropriate abstention can be valid. Not proof of leakage." } ], "findings": [ { "severity": "error", "code": "case_completeness", "title": "399/400 cases have final answers and Haiku scores", "detail": "Q024 / Gemini Flash / sql_streaming returned a tool call during forced finalization and was not judged." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "http_retries", "title": "4 failed HTTP attempts are retained", "detail": "Failed HTTP attempts were followed by later successful replies for their tags. This differs from the terminal case-level failure." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "billing", "title": "Billing contains unpriced failed attempts", "detail": "Known reported charges are a subtotal. Missing usage on HTTP errors is unknown, not confirmed zero." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "tool_retrieval_errors", "title": "311 tool error responses", "detail": "SQL schema/syntax errors, duplicate filing-ID rejection and bounded allocation failures can consume the eight-tool budget and cause abstention. A scored case is not proof of successful retrieval." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "duplicate_ids", "title": "176333 duplicated filing-ID groups inside source files", "detail": "Scoped SQL and filing-read tools reject duplicate IDs. Next experiments should distinguish identical stored-checksum copies from conflicting records and support an explicit row identity. No originals were deduplicated or altered." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "memory", "title": "Memory reached 2048 MiB; 0 OOM kills", "detail": "The process-tree limit prevented machine-wide growth. Reaching memory.max still caused pressure and some worker allocation failures; no swap was used." }, { "severity": "info", "code": "score_denominator", "title": "Scores are judge estimates over scored cases", "detail": "The primary mean excludes the failed case. A separate coverage-adjusted mean treats missing scores as zero without changing the original score. Citation support and correctness are distinct; neither is a guarantee of objective truth." }, { "severity": "info", "code": "latency_fairness", "title": "Shared-cache, concurrent-run latency", "detail": "Four concurrent cases, one serial data tool and a shared cache mean queueing and cache order affect timing. This is not an independent cold-cache latency comparison. The same 100 questions repeat across four conditions, so do not treat 400 scores as independent questions." }, { "severity": "info", "code": "reference_limit", "title": "Reference and evidence limitations", "detail": "Judge inputs and scores were mechanically checked against raw payloads. Gold quotes were checked for visibility in retrieved outputs, not reverified against every full source filing. Expected-filing recall only counts explicit accession IDs in structured outputs. Long-excerpt flags are heuristics, not proof of leakage." }, { "severity": "warning", "code": "question_supplied_operands", "title": "Some questions already supply the financial operands", "detail": "Q053, Q059, Q076, Q083 and Q085 include numbers sufficient for substantial arithmetic answers. High correctness with little retrieved text can therefore reflect calculation from the question, rather than successful document retrieval. For example, Q059 / Flash / SQL used a constant arithmetic SELECT; Haiku awarded 98 correctness and 80 citation support. Report correctness and retrieval indicators separately." }, { "severity": "pass", "code": "consistency", "title": "Saved payloads, scores and summaries reconcile", "detail": "See structured audit checks and the original-preservation manifest. No requests were retried and no answers were rejudged." } ], "mechanically_consistent": true }, "model_summary": [ { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "all", "expected": 200, "scored": 199, "failed": 1, "completion_percent": 99.5, "mean_correctness": 69.19597989949749, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 68.85, "mean_citation_support": 82.07035175879398, "perfect_scores": 42, "scores_at_least_80": 132, "scores_below_50": 57, "known_cost_usd": 7.278016875, "answer_known_cost_usd": 6.969891675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.3081252, "unknown_cost_attempts": 2, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.036390084375, "mean_wall_seconds": 35.236144607580194, "p95_wall_seconds": 68.27765254795038, "tool_requested": 1438, "tool_processed": 1437, "tool_dispatched": 1437, "tool_cache_hits": 272, "tool_errors": 196, "cases_with_tool_errors": 126, "budget_exhausted_cases": 122, "mean_tools": 7.19, "api_attempts": 1838, "api_failed_attempts": 2, "prompt_tokens": 11012927, "completion_tokens": 291676, "reasoning_tokens": 70267, "cache_read_tokens": 107629, "expected_filing_recall": 0.9175 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "all", "expected": 200, "scored": 200, "failed": 0, "completion_percent": 100.0, "mean_correctness": 60.655, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 60.655, "mean_citation_support": 81.755, "perfect_scores": 38, "scores_at_least_80": 109, "scores_below_50": 77, "known_cost_usd": 0.67240631, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.38967381, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.2827325, "unknown_cost_attempts": 2, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.0033620315499999997, "mean_wall_seconds": 33.37857226524501, "p95_wall_seconds": 67.22530707555032, "tool_requested": 1277, "tool_processed": 1277, "tool_dispatched": 1271, "tool_cache_hits": 252, "tool_errors": 115, "cases_with_tool_errors": 64, "budget_exhausted_cases": 77, "mean_tools": 6.385, "api_attempts": 1600, "api_failed_attempts": 2, "prompt_tokens": 8362995, "completion_tokens": 274229, "reasoning_tokens": 101682, "cache_read_tokens": 3926896, "expected_filing_recall": 0.785 } ], "strategy_summary": [ { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "expected": 100, "scored": 100, "failed": 0, "completion_percent": 100.0, "mean_correctness": 66.63, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 66.63, "mean_citation_support": 79.86, "perfect_scores": 16, "scores_at_least_80": 63, "scores_below_50": 31, "known_cost_usd": 3.26052165, "answer_known_cost_usd": 3.13814025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.1223814, "unknown_cost_attempts": 2, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.0326052165, "mean_wall_seconds": 36.02529437569014, "p95_wall_seconds": 69.84689456769975, "tool_requested": 710, "tool_processed": 710, "tool_dispatched": 710, "tool_cache_hits": 104, "tool_errors": 82, "cases_with_tool_errors": 50, "budget_exhausted_cases": 60, "mean_tools": 7.1, "api_attempts": 912, "api_failed_attempts": 2, "prompt_tokens": 4650652, "completion_tokens": 153088, "reasoning_tokens": 37027, "cache_read_tokens": 8990, "expected_filing_recall": 0.89 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "expected": 100, "scored": 99, "failed": 1, "completion_percent": 99.0, "mean_correctness": 71.78787878787878, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 71.07, "mean_citation_support": 84.3030303030303, "perfect_scores": 26, "scores_at_least_80": 69, "scores_below_50": 26, "known_cost_usd": 4.017495225, "answer_known_cost_usd": 3.831751425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.1857438, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.04017495225, "mean_wall_seconds": 34.44699483947024, "p95_wall_seconds": 65.63098632854998, "tool_requested": 728, "tool_processed": 727, "tool_dispatched": 727, "tool_cache_hits": 168, "tool_errors": 114, "cases_with_tool_errors": 76, "budget_exhausted_cases": 62, "mean_tools": 7.28, "api_attempts": 926, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "prompt_tokens": 6362275, "completion_tokens": 138588, "reasoning_tokens": 33240, "cache_read_tokens": 98639, "expected_filing_recall": 0.945 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "expected": 100, "scored": 100, "failed": 0, "completion_percent": 100.0, "mean_correctness": 65.58, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 65.58, "mean_citation_support": 83.06, "perfect_scores": 20, "scores_at_least_80": 61, "scores_below_50": 33, "known_cost_usd": 0.30070137, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.17678257, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.1239188, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.0030070137, "mean_wall_seconds": 33.78430022564002, "p95_wall_seconds": 70.0086022992512, "tool_requested": 608, "tool_processed": 608, "tool_dispatched": 608, "tool_cache_hits": 111, "tool_errors": 45, "cases_with_tool_errors": 26, "budget_exhausted_cases": 32, "mean_tools": 6.08, "api_attempts": 788, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "prompt_tokens": 3749269, "completion_tokens": 142776, "reasoning_tokens": 52277, "cache_read_tokens": 1866987, "expected_filing_recall": 0.825 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "expected": 100, "scored": 100, "failed": 0, "completion_percent": 100.0, "mean_correctness": 55.73, "coverage_adjusted_correctness": 55.73, "mean_citation_support": 80.45, "perfect_scores": 18, "scores_at_least_80": 48, "scores_below_50": 44, "known_cost_usd": 0.37170494, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.21289124, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.1588137, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "mean_known_cost_usd": 0.0037170493999999998, "mean_wall_seconds": 32.97284430485001, "p95_wall_seconds": 57.35105596284945, "tool_requested": 669, "tool_processed": 669, "tool_dispatched": 663, "tool_cache_hits": 141, "tool_errors": 70, "cases_with_tool_errors": 38, "budget_exhausted_cases": 45, "mean_tools": 6.69, "api_attempts": 812, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "prompt_tokens": 4613726, "completion_tokens": 131453, "reasoning_tokens": 49405, "cache_read_tokens": 2059909, "expected_filing_recall": 0.745 } ], "difficulty_summary": [ { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "easy", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 91.7 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "medium", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 56.1 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 75.12 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "very_hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 44.8 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "extreme", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 52.6 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 89.2 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "easy", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 87.75 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "medium", "count": 20, "scored": 19, "mean_correctness": 68.94736842105263 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 77.64 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "very_hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 52.16 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "extreme", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 70 }, { "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 89.4 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "easy", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 73.05 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "medium", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 70.75 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 72.32 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "very_hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 48.48 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "extreme", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 58.8 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 73.6 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "easy", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 45.9 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "medium", "count": 20, "scored": 20, "mean_correctness": 53.7 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 66.28 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "very_hard", "count": 25, "scored": 25, "mean_correctness": 46.56 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "extreme", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 70.8 }, { "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "method": "sql_streaming", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "count": 5, "scored": 5, "mean_correctness": 81.2 } ], "questions": [ { "id": "Q001", "question": "What is the par value and trading symbol of Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and trades under the ticker symbol GOOGL on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Cover Page - Title of Each Class of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act", "exact_quote": "| **Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value** | **GOOGL** | **Nasdaq Stock Market LLC** |" } ], "case_ids": [ "7df8a4f2b4f81b7f8a15fae9", "4767b1a9ca76cfa9f3b73730", "992c0ad547a4b81de10eb650", "69227e6d31c6c399d39aebe9" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 73.75, "total_correctness": 295, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.038741555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 19, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q002", "question": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, how many shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C stock were outstanding as of January 28, 2025?", "reference": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Cover Page - Outstanding Shares", "exact_quote": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of the Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding." } ], "case_ids": [ "d260bd067f8603398727a29a", "dcd393ba5198971309c88499", "b9c419d7814a4d51555584d2", "de8520c95cad8fc7d4507ffe" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 76.75, "total_correctness": 307, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.048694944999999996, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 22, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q003", "question": "Who is the independent registered public accounting firm for Amazon.com, Inc., and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Amazon.com, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1996.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1996." } ], "case_ids": [ "9ff309fe4aac85f4fabb5b2d", "2bc63ba8ec9c8256d00f733b", "67283a27e5e87f7567351e2a", "b0f0c74f84b3fdd8fd860db0" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 95 }, "mean_correctness": 95.75, "total_correctness": 383, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.039543085, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q004", "question": "How many shares of common stock did Amazon.com, Inc. have outstanding as of January 29, 2025 as disclosed on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc. had 10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Cover Page - Shares Outstanding", "exact_quote": "| Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025 | 10597729352 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "60992ed75efd02a4bfcf807a", "ce0183c497d92fea15bb6df7", "1748197bbe6736635df1b80b", "a185a003b42bf12605b85417" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 100, "total_correctness": 400, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.04763079, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 16, "flags": [] }, { "id": "Q005", "question": "What was the number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 as reported on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Cover Page - Common Stock Outstanding", "exact_quote": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion." } ], "case_ids": [ "4fe04ef418cd5b88c473eb91", "6c5a7987cc2d606eff884b9c", "8e2ab4d6bf1865da1cd163f1", "ab116275de069e0822affec0" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 100, "total_correctness": 400, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07551121, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 20, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q006", "question": "Who is NVIDIA Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is NVIDIA Corporation's auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 2004.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004." } ], "case_ids": [ "9432056ff6531142e1c30527", "44189afddf36018a322aaa2f", "4dc5c08f1bd5dd8cdc6ac639", "1387273f94f0674566cf275c" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 50, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 62, "total_correctness": 248, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.069392945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q007", "question": "How many shares of common stock were outstanding for Intel Corporation as of January 24, 2025 as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "As of January 24, 2025, 4,330 million shares of Intel common stock were outstanding.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Cover Page - Common Stock Outstanding", "exact_quote": "4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025." } ], "case_ids": [ "c49c4376204d97256c8db455", "5c7eefd120b294ee3dc04328", "b7b4a4775621dc82a2c8ec2e", "1de82060cdcaec701d035a4d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 99.5, "total_correctness": 398, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.043925995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 17, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q008", "question": "Who serves as Intel Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Intel Corporation's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1968.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968." } ], "case_ids": [ "a12b21514ea9b0d2b7dda403", "2000b87599213fb1c8cf2b6b", "ff0c7b33c86f8c5773f3ff94", "20695eea25de0c4c63c5c975" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 77.75, "total_correctness": 311, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.054067365, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q009", "question": "Who is Adobe Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Adobe Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1983.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983." } ], "case_ids": [ "275f7e49cbc484a5ca796712", "71952ba9d82d356bd16807bc", "43e63b1a762126b148217675", "d4e74addd955e2d8864e5506" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 74.5, "total_correctness": 298, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.088689355, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 25, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ] }, { "id": "Q010", "question": "What is the state of incorporation and IRS Employer Identification Number of Adobe Inc. as reported in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. is incorporated in Delaware (DE) and its IRS Employer Identification Number is 77-0019522 (770019522).", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Filing Summary - Company Data", "exact_quote": "- **STATE OF INCORPORATION:** DE\n- **FISCAL YEAR END:** 1129" } ], "case_ids": [ "5412e491957d1e3fae79b115", "74aac97f40b551d3e37cb3ae", "65b63292a4a7282bc528dc68", "74c1bfb8dee7f8799aeeacc3" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 74.25, "total_correctness": 297, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.03345253, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 20, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q011", "question": "Who serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for Levi Strauss & Co., and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent auditor for Levi Strauss & Co., serving as auditor since 2007.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000094845-25-000005", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007." } ], "case_ids": [ "19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd", "766e81a6b3f292017bb295a2", "166977ec3432be6c4053ddc3", "fffa914d683f4734766476a9" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 78.75, "total_correctness": 315, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.05162474, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ] }, { "id": "Q012", "question": "In what state is Comcast Corporation incorporated, and who is its independent auditor and auditor tenure?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in Pennsylvania, and its independent auditor is Deloitte & Touche LLP, which has served as auditor since 1963.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001166691-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1963." } ], "case_ids": [ "dd182a84024299bb5cdf8d45", "81e523951475d477976010e0", "b0b7404450521171e2736058", "8b983ed89f0d7c639e3dcccd" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 60, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 50 }, "mean_correctness": 77, "total_correctness": 308, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.083880945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q013", "question": "Who serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Citigroup Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 1969.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000831001-25-000067", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1969." } ], "case_ids": [ "fe99cd9f2d5b3cee369d0e23", "92440752c5ac50c01ccbea64", "2aace8e3bb6e546d221b3bff", "a87cc82105833909ca6e6001" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 50, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 95 }, "mean_correctness": 62.75, "total_correctness": 251, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.0861555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q014", "question": "Who is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s auditor, having served as auditor since 1922.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000886982-25-000005", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1922." } ], "case_ids": [ "62a42028674e208c2d9d459a", "caf4bcfa4cb49b2ea2ec7878", "162b49fca865abf73b4c3b52", "14e19de60b28f60b65d3e22d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 56.25, "total_correctness": 225, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.082906065, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q015", "question": "Who is ConocoPhillips's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is ConocoPhillips's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1949.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001163165-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949." } ], "case_ids": [ "fde5831f4c98c06a7ad08a97", "25f5981f0247e2246508d757", "846015078b9b17f0e2d44353", "462204d02624ccffbe2973ae" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 77.5, "total_correctness": 310, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.048903015, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q016", "question": "Where are Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices located, and who serves as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229, and its auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (serving since 2010).", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001510295-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 2010." } ], "case_ids": [ "91f54d323288a829b557a6d6", "d27d8e3ca784c85e2f5ba9d1", "7daea0de843e6c9159408d11", "7484fbcda663ae5028acde2f" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 65, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 50, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 50 }, "mean_correctness": 65.75, "total_correctness": 263, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.101496675, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q017", "question": "Who is Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Whirlpool Corporation's independent auditor, having served as auditor since 1927.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000106640-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 1927." } ], "case_ids": [ "60432477f90b8ff3775dd987", "5d1295d9f2062a73135a2702", "1714de54a17a46a1ba98d6e7", "e01cd3ca6f10932b4b67365d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 50, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 86.5, "total_correctness": 346, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.074916595, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q018", "question": "In what state is Morningstar, Inc. incorporated, and who serves as its independent auditor and since what year?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in Illinois, and its independent auditor is KPMG LLP, which has served as auditor since 2011.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001289419-25-000041", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011." } ], "case_ids": [ "d7a01a1d2bca5d5d4fa70392", "c76f52703f5f90136c307409", "04ed1d495d01acb4c848bd4b", "0b9869d7fe2f30c6923d80df" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 50 }, "mean_correctness": 60.75, "total_correctness": 243, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.078134035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q019", "question": "Who serves as C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "Deloitte & Touche LLP is C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 2002.", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001043277-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "exact_quote": "We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002." } ], "case_ids": [ "2034c44356d1394cedac7bd5", "584cdcc8921d3dfd9fc2c9e8", "7da220c3670ac1a126d25ed0", "ab7a817d5c655e65ef03e416" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 50, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 63.75, "total_correctness": 255, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.05616155, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q020", "question": "Under what Item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025 under Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000829224-25-000006", "section": "Item 7.01", "exact_quote": "**Item 7.01    Regulation FD Disclosure.**" } ], "case_ids": [ "ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0", "06d64acae366377e356bdfd6", "097396cf0517ac065f727c97", "ccdb290f9a83145cb5b16c82" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 90, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 28.75, "total_correctness": 115, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.051423415, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q021", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Alphabet Inc.'s consolidated revenue growth rate, and what were the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Alphabet Inc.'s revenues were $350.0 billion (an increase of 14% year over year), driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion (12%) and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion (31%).", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Overview", "exact_quote": "Revenues were $350.0 billion, an increase of 14% year over year, primarily driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion, or 12%, and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion" } ], "case_ids": [ "d7f4fd96e557ecd3b5becac4", "8831b7c9ae582752318de3f0", "f1e078cc136a06b33df43f96", "5ad971da918c13218c4f6856" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 22, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 11.75, "total_correctness": 47, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.084934755, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q022", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was the breakdown of Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales between net product sales and net service sales?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Amazon.com, Inc. reported net product sales of $272,311 million ($272.3 billion) and net service sales of $365,648 million ($365.6 billion), totaling $637,959 million ($638.0 billion).", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "Net product sales | $242901 | $255887 | $272311 |\n| Net service sales | 271082 | 318898 | 365648 |\n|       Total net sales | 513983 | 574785 | 637959 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "1afa30d89cf46ba536359ac4", "1fa7f20b8a92efbc0ab1330a", "cb0ad69787d7866b57ac803d", "0ca7f0e527bdf3f68d762e02" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 85, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 94.75, "total_correctness": 379, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08345925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 20, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q023", "question": "For the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, what were NVIDIA Corporation's operating expenses for Research and development and Sales, general and administrative?", "reference": "For fiscal year 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported Research and development expense of $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and Sales, general and administrative expense of $3,491 million ($3.491 billion).", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|         Research and development | 12914 | 8675 | 7339 |\n|         Sales, general and administrative | 3491 | 2654 | 2440 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "5e3e3a62e16c4965ca5bf3a9", "a07f396d67147daf22f03ecc", "9c900ddac796aa19d47457c2", "021343b24ed52598adf63a99" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 25, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 80.75, "total_correctness": 323, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08728415499999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q024", "question": "What was Intel Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024, and by what dollar amount and percentage did it decrease compared to 2023?", "reference": "Intel Corporation's 2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - A Year in Review", "exact_quote": "2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023 due to lower all other revenue and lower Intel Foundry revenue, partially offset by higher Intel Products revenue." } ], "case_ids": [ "eba9e55e15eefdc9ea399d70", "5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb", "6abf6e432f1d6a0bd9f6ed81", "96cd9ba347dc77830d93c1ae" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 5, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": null, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 65, "total_correctness": 195, "scored": 3, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08202409000000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "case_failed", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q025", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue, and what was its year-over-year percentage growth from fiscal 2023?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "Total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth." } ], "case_ids": [ "1bc7a6455cd16e9f0fe562b0", "2abfbd2e6e3eb638382fb4db", "6f153e48d6d7c34e76e73ef8", "9af36a1d0a372cbf85715e3d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 72.25, "total_correctness": 289, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07546731500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q026", "question": "What were Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2024, and what percentage of net revenues did they represent?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,246.2 million in fiscal year 2024, representing 51.1% of net revenues (up 6.4% from $3,051.9 million in 2023).", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000094845-25-000005", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "|     Selling, general and administrative expenses | 3246.2 | 3051.9 | 6.4% | 51.1% | 49.4% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "ba230f6cbb20547a88404b3a", "666e0a03bcc905b932bee14c", "4d59216329d876ed5a869839", "fa75d127203760deefdb76f2" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 28, "total_correctness": 112, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.063161865, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q027", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Comcast Corporation's costs for Programming and production, Marketing and promotion, and Other operating and administrative?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation reported Programming and production costs of $37,026 million, Marketing and promotion of $8,073 million, and Other operating and administrative expenses of $40,533 million in fiscal year 2024.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001166691-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|    Programming and production | **37026** | 36762 | 38213 |\n|    Marketing and promotion | **8073** | 7971 | 8506 |\n|    Other operating and administrative | **40533** | 39190 | 38263 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "1478c34e5fdc1e72522cda9e", "770540e284a348f0f9b764ef", "91bbec0c069affc69f21c757", "7a4546c9813a2b7528927ec3" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 15, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 78.75, "total_correctness": 315, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.095500165, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q028", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Citigroup Inc.'s Net interest income, Non-interest revenue, and Revenues net of interest expense?", "reference": "In 2024, Citigroup Inc. reported Net interest income of $54,095 million, Non-interest revenue of $27,044 million, and Total revenues net of interest expense of $81,139 million.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000831001-25-000067", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Summary Table", "exact_quote": "| **Revenues, net of interest expense** | $**81139** | $78462 | $75338 | $71884 | $75501 |\n| Operating expenses | **53984** | 56366 | 51292 | 48193 | 44374 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "551ee5966be220c3c59a84ba", "4b4a649440a72008ea48c4b3", "345944a20125240be05f4082", "f682da7d68e8c4a8c63f3617" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 35 }, "mean_correctness": 60.5, "total_correctness": 242, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09917128, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q029", "question": "What were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Total net revenues in fiscal years 2024 and 2023?", "reference": "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported Total net revenues of $53,512 million in 2024, compared to $46,254 million in 2023.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000886982-25-000005", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Net Revenues Table", "exact_quote": "| **Total net revenues** | $**53512** | $46254 | $47365 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "2239f305a9c3b3291129d656", "8cce746a1037a877a2e1818f", "7b0ec0299445c8c31951e142", "405a9afe690dc743d1332712" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 8, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 31, "total_correctness": 124, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.10695681500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q030", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were ConocoPhillips's expenses for Purchased commodities and Production and operating expenses?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips reported Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million in 2024.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001163165-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Purchased commodities | **20012** | 21975 | 33971 |\n| Production and operating expenses | **8751** | 7693 | 7006 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "5e50ea69a3738459f8882fdd", "177dff567eb58ed0f0fe8015", "96a1b4a311391e618ca74a09", "d893004a7851083b330d6bdf" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 100, "total_correctness": 400, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.091227675, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 26, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q031", "question": "What was Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income in fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $150,307 million in 2023.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001510295-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Total revenues and other income | 140412 | 150307 | (9895) | 179952 | (29645) |" } ], "case_ids": [ "c1fd05b81c27963e48dd65c3", "3a1faf0e50d16ac85e1e5c5b", "d5a5a28a23ba027b15c0ea5e", "486ee47164b7ae42b0cd956b" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 97 }, "mean_correctness": 73.5, "total_correctness": 294, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.086736245, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 24, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q032", "question": "What were Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales, Cost of products sold, and Gross margin in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Whirlpool Corporation reported Net sales of $16,607 million, Cost of products sold of $14,026 million, and Gross margin of $2,581 million.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000106640-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| **Net sales** | $**16607** | $19455 | $19724 |\n| **Expenses** | | | |\n| Cost of products sold | **14026** | 16285 | 16651 |\n|    Gross margin | **2581** | 3170 | 3073 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "e4c4bb7de33f9bd400f663c5", "724d380dda736ea0d90d2436", "518be0f23611e26c55351b93", "f2f2eee0825795f8b79bb76d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 76.75, "total_correctness": 307, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09772586999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q033", "question": "How many permanent, full-time employees did Morningstar, Inc. have as of December 31, 2024, and what proportion worked in India and the United States?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Morningstar, Inc. had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world, with approximately 41% working in India and 30% in the United States.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001289419-25-000041", "section": "Item 1. Business - Human Capital Resources", "exact_quote": "As of December 31, 2024, we had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world." } ], "case_ids": [ "7e677827b065a989e9309363", "b16d3904b5dd0871fb6fc682", "1b1288219ed83900135d9f1b", "07f967ee769f856ff06fddd3" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 93 }, "mean_correctness": 47, "total_correctness": 188, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.06590834500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 26, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q034", "question": "What were Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million in fiscal year 2024.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001109357-25-000043", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|   Electric operating revenues | $21338 | $19267 | $16899 |\n|   Natural gas operating revenues | 1782 | 1764 | 2018 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "8d9cdbc417054333b70f5a3f", "68131914bf2fc8cc1e1de4ab", "6ba51cf3ce04ab7cfc4a1c4e", "07830dfa1987b9f985d8f2a5" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 3.75, "total_correctness": 15, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08338946, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q035", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for Purchased transportation and related services?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported Purchased transportation and related services expenses of $13,719,935 thousand ($13.72 billion) in 2024.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001043277-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview Table", "exact_quote": "|       Purchased transportation and related services | 13719935 | | 13886024 | | 20035715 | |" } ], "case_ids": [ "fffaefa5d62763c235fe409b", "a7f40311967bb280d1faff1f", "371b70bdabc31181a0b17d85", "a9ca089ec43929e84469ab36" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 73.75, "total_correctness": 295, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.086730045, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 24, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q036", "question": "What were Utz Brands, Inc.'s Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc. reported Selling and distribution expenses of $306,151 thousand and Administrative expenses of $129,642 thousand, totaling $435,793 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001739566-25-000053", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|    Selling and distribution | 306151 | 273923 |\n|    Administrative | 129642 | 159196 |\n|     Total selling, distribution, and administrative expenses | 435793 | 433119 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "e2ba6225b507eec66c5c2827", "1241a79aeffb275f84ff363f", "b2b30f11b1f0c09bb1e93269", "d18291409d721e2602dd836b" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 49.5, "total_correctness": 198, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.076431895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q037", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Sabre Corporation's revenues for its two business segments, Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Sabre Corporation reported Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions revenue of $326,819 thousand.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001597033-25-000027", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Segment Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "Travel Solutions | $2744844 | $2642077 | $102767 | 4% |\n| Hospitality Solutions | 326819 | 304169 | 22650 | 7% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "12692d7ce69f6db6c3a3e28a", "7bf6be5639f6b756154e1ae2", "96f200b00cc66f74681f433a", "3d95e9437f85ac9b672b9906" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 12, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 29.25, "total_correctness": 117, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.076960565, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q038", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what was Microsoft Corporation's Total revenue as reported on its Consolidated Income Statements?", "reference": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft Corporation reported Total revenue of $69,632 million.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000950170-25-010491", "section": "Part I - Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements - Income Statements", "exact_quote": "|             Total revenue | **69632** | 62020 | **135217** | 118537 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "46c8e37976818d4dd2781562", "600923745ec4b723965ef944", "d9d03a9baf672f2a0c1049d6", "c6cb1f6b661407168695f007" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 99.5, "total_correctness": 398, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.04723574, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 20, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q039", "question": "For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, by what percentage did NIKE Brand footwear revenues decrease on a currency-neutral basis, and what drove that change?", "reference": "NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis, driven by a 7% decrease in unit sales and a reduction of approximately 5 percentage points due to lower average selling price (ASP) per pair resulting from higher discounts and channel mix changes.", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000320187-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000320187-25-000004", "section": "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Segment Revenues", "exact_quote": "• NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis. Unit sales of footwear decreased 7%, while lower average selling price (\"ASP\") per pair reduced footwear revenues by approximately 5 percentage points." } ], "case_ids": [ "0f2c3ca9d16bf5e92de76e56", "7beff914f0a354c41898565e", "963929704305bde3bf873af7", "7faf9e577051229b3e5776f7" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 73.75, "total_correctness": 295, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07182134500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "other", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q040", "question": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated reported total QCT revenues of $10,084 million for the three months ended December 29, 2024 (comprising Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M).", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000804328-25-000011", "section": "Part I - Note 7. Segment Information", "exact_quote": "|       Total QCT revenues | $10084 | $8423 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "b0ad9eca2711e3a75f710339", "1442d452d02c93e215370252", "ec4c6c06dd58a78c06cdcd3e", "92c3257f7e0a4c49429a6feb" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 92, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 97, "total_correctness": 388, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.085046, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q041", "question": "What was Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table, and by how many percentage points did it increase compared to 2023?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin was 32% in fiscal year 2024 (Operating income of $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion), representing an increase of 5 percentage points from 27% in 2023.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations Table", "exact_quote": "| Operating income | $84293 | $112390 | $28097 | 33% |\n| Operating margin | 27% | 32% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "ebe460260f8618abe5f6a7bc", "9f961313e3c4efc3222406bc", "6c8a35901939fc211307bccb", "ef3ec11d5b8523f090296f64" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 97 }, "mean_correctness": 96, "total_correctness": 384, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.120711015, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q042", "question": "Calculate Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 by subtracting Purchases of property and equipment from Net cash provided by operating activities.", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $72,764 million ($72.764 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($125,299 million) minus Purchases of property and equipment ($52,535 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "Purchases of property and equipment | (31485) | (32251) | (52535) |" } ], "case_ids": [ "9fc52c2c55876700104ac985", "638cd8ec9a08aa14775c3b2a", "b6aedcd6d7982a592a150fed", "fa2cd3fbba8c1cce9daad83d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 25, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 81.25, "total_correctness": 325, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09460497500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q043", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s percentage year-over-year growth in total net sales from 2023 ($574,785 million) to 2024 ($637,959 million)?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales grew by 10.99% (calculated as ($637,959M - $574,785M) / $574,785M * 100).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|       Total net sales | 513983 | 574785 | 637959 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "67fd22e518df9f674f38085f", "39ecaf26a2b6362ba8a83225", "4c83ee4a1a31a6b2066f689a", "d32cd3e392d7b70780335272" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 93 }, "mean_correctness": 94.75, "total_correctness": 379, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07056793, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q044", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total net sales?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 10.75%, calculated as Operating income ($68,593 million) divided by Total net sales ($637,959 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Operating income | 12248 | 36852 | 68593 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "84c5e7fa492d5f09074b0ea8", "c121a741dfc2241102914f8c", "131ae79b2dd9cf8a076f25b4", "d69681471cdca528c519f037" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 93, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 95.75, "total_correctness": 383, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.070177005, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q045", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $38,219 million ($38.219 billion), reflecting Net cash provided by operating activities of $115,877 million minus Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives of $77,658 million.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Free Cash Flow Table", "exact_quote": "| Free cash flow | $36813 | $38219 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "20a5650db6e38c3f17535182", "acdb82b5005ce4a76956a6ba", "1d8ec9897a5d055eb1855599", "91a57532a6924c31b980d289" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 53.75, "total_correctness": 215, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.068263625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q046", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew by 114.20% (or 114%) in fiscal year 2025, rising from $60,922 million to $130,497 million.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "| Revenue | $130497 | $60922 | Up 114% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "943c40ca3387e20a44f154b5", "1e44888e84e42c9d92516ab5", "ccbf669380d40f528be9cbb2", "aed1b969e582b10bc08c6888" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 85 }, "mean_correctness": 93, "total_correctness": 372, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.106765065, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q047", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin was 74.99% (reported as 75.0%), calculated as Gross profit ($97,858 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Gross profit | 97858 | 44301 | 15356 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "bb3ee0dce31f40407da84aa7", "8b7356c142ee00f47394d888", "12f19b9e1e4f0d5ab4775d1c", "e676440dc888264ce7ca273a" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 90, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 85, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 95 }, "mean_correctness": 90, "total_correctness": 360, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.088346445, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q048", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin in fiscal year 2025 was 62.42%, calculated as Operating income ($81,453 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Operating income | 81453 | 32972 | 4224 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "f3f15b3e7a566f5e0810d4ca", "26f893eab83030b493c3164a", "a2fe7d1f1457c6afa29bebcb", "e2cc11bfc0319e33a9a6f228" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 90 }, "mean_correctness": 93, "total_correctness": 372, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.06991514, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 24, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q049", "question": "Calculate NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2025 (Net cash provided by operating activities minus Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets).", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2025 was $60,853 million ($60.853 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($64,089 million) minus capital expenditures ($3,236 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "| Net cash provided by operating activities | 64089 | 28090 | 5641 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "2c00c7056363cb0503815e38", "9ece3a65506c8a8e21a65df2", "e15ff71714de399c5b04c68a", "f226cce223017ad0421fc49d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 99.25, "total_correctness": 397, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09992008499999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q050", "question": "What percentage of Intel Corporation's total 2024 revenue ($53.1 billion) was invested into Research and Development ($16.5 billion)?", "reference": "Intel Corporation invested 31.07% of its total 2024 revenue into R&D ($16.5 billion R&D / $53.1 billion revenue).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "In 2024, we invested $16.5 billion in R&D, made gross capital investments of $25.1 billion" } ], "case_ids": [ "205fee452567b1d4c899613b", "0140a2d3227962424e1124be", "31a3078c0e9cd140185f6d2b", "6a0ac77079591911d9c37245" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 92 }, "mean_correctness": 93, "total_correctness": 372, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09147449, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 25, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q051", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin in fiscal year 2024 was 89.04%, calculated as Gross profit ($19,147 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|
Gross profit | 19147 | 17055 | 15441 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "80434e6a63dc4588c0867995", "1ca3505f242fe62b2945508e", "660c6497846f9cfa9171889b", "a36dbf71d0b4e05ca8672bba" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 100, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 99, "total_correctness": 396, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07501157, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 24, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q052", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total revenue?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 31.35%, calculated as Operating income ($6,741 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|
Operating income | 6741 | 6650 | 6098 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "0046d80e5a3e758d2382e4e5", "ad4acf179ce3a567b3f287ca", "7557f45d9340e657e9d8457e", "18b3fdd031cc1cd63de9e7c2" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 80, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 93.75, "total_correctness": 375, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.072008795, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q053", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s year-over-year percentage revenue growth from fiscal 2023 ($19,409 million) to fiscal 2024 ($21,505 million)?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total revenue grew by 10.80% in fiscal 2024 (calculated as ($21,505M - $19,409M) / $19,409M * 100).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|       Total revenue | 21505 | 19409 | 17606 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "26d755af17fbb0757cfe70f1", "2d7b04f6a9a37d92dd653c13", "1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5", "8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 97.25, "total_correctness": 389, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.061543230000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 20, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q054", "question": "What was Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, and what was the percentage point expansion compared to 2023?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin was 60.0% (60.04%) in fiscal year 2024 ($3,815.9 million on net revenues of $6,355.3 million), expanding by 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000094845-25-000005", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "|     Gross profit | 3815.9 | 3515.7 | 8.5% | 60.0% | 56.9% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "85bbe156ec36eaac3a316a21", "00549988c280d155564c21da", "3e646f58b80d337a3599c82d", "2c1b9511f8eafb873c20a28a" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 3, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 88 }, "mean_correctness": 29, "total_correctness": 116, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.063985525, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q055", "question": "What was Comcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation's operating income margin was 18.83% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income ($23,297 million) divided by Revenue ($123,731 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001166691-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| **Operating income** | **23297** | 23314 | 14041 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "bc8b444159ed61bade4515bc", "51556f71363d274d044f8e66", "4a2c83596601ee3a57aee384", "594c64c7e833485fef4a2bed" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 51.5, "total_correctness": 206, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.101989935, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q056", "question": "What was ConocoPhillips's net income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Net income divided by Total Revenues and Other Income?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips's net income margin was 16.23% in 2024, calculated as Net income ($9,245 million) divided by Total Revenues and Other Income ($56,953 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001163165-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Net income (loss) | $**9245** | 10957 | 18680 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "10ff93070aa49451ca73a8c3", "dca22301927083e30fe5ce1c", "9b8832ec4b363ccc631bb446", "6bde0deffb93ba2a9915172d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 77, "total_correctness": 308, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08915726, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q057", "question": "Calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 (Total current assets minus Total current liabilities).", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was $3,620 million ($3.62 billion), calculated as Total current assets ($24,447 million) minus Total current liabilities ($20,827 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001510295-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Balance Sheets", "exact_quote": "| Total current assets | 24447 | 32131 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "e6fb641f0329ade761b21008", "5044936888ee0b931f50af12", "86a0523158965f0578a51d26", "53fd88b5632c79fd28acf3d0" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 20, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 80, "total_correctness": 320, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.107583135, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q058", "question": "What was Whirlpool Corporation's percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table?", "reference": "Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales decreased by 14.6% in 2024 (declining from $19,455 million in 2023 to $16,607 million in 2024).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000106640-25-000011", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Consolidated Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Net sales | $**16607** | **(14.6)%** | $19455 | (1.4)% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "c7ffb40651243c1d326c433d", "dc581d539798c0a346639ff1", "f4ef4b049d9f7460be367303", "c66b8556cc9ad15e423cbf56" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 15, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 30.5, "total_correctness": 122, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08599728999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q059", "question": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.'s 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and its 11,085 permanent, full-time employees, what was the average revenue generated per employee in 2024?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc.'s average revenue per employee in 2024 was $205,241.32 ($205.24 thousand per employee), calculated as $2,275,100,000 divided by 11,085 employees.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001289419-25-000041", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Key Metrics Table", "exact_quote": "| Revenue | $2275.1 | $2038.6 | 11.6% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02", "f67cef7319817ef6179e509f", "cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2", "19618a96029f446f1ca8906c" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 96.5, "total_correctness": 386, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.03175276, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 15, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q060", "question": "What was Exelon Corporation's operating margin percentage in 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total operating revenues?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation's operating margin was 18.76% in 2024, calculated as Operating income ($4,319 million) divided by Total operating revenues ($23,028 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001109357-25-000043", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "| **Operating income** | 4319 | 4023 | 3315 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "93bbc0eaf3fa354053a93acf", "971b86890713c9a4c5c6daf7", "29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358", "7b12dccc92e2afb2be77b373" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 6.25, "total_correctness": 25, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.082603625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ] }, { "id": "Q061", "question": "What was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Overview Table?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin was 15.3% (15.35%) in 2024 ($2,720,706 thousand gross profit on total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001043277-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview Table", "exact_quote": "| **Gross profits/Gross profit margin** | 2720706 | 15.3% | 2570988 | 14.6% | 3567690 | 14.4% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "0faf79f0f8bf3efd71c8bc83", "39d94a1892658d95c2fb19b9", "fda6d9ab847fdcad1b28cf4e", "0b6d32602f87ab4aa3de1e6e" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 30.75, "total_correctness": 123, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.074212685, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q062", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Gross profit divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin was 35.11% in 2024, calculated as Gross profit ($494,777 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001739566-25-000053", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|     Gross profit | 494777 | 456486 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "dfa706da022a3525d622a96b", "264191f2916639c58663eafd", "cec9a900951ef778ab8a5958", "e093e4e7459a3a90955bf051" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 5, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 33.25, "total_correctness": 133, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07220948, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q063", "question": "By what dollar amount and percentage did Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increase in 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increased by $102,767 thousand ($102.8 million), or 4% (3.89%), from $2,642,077 thousand in 2023 to $2,744,844 thousand in 2024.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001597033-25-000027", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Segment Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "Travel Solutions | $2744844 | $2642077 | $102767 | 4% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "b643aa55e49cc781614f58f2", "a0e4aba28c69951301f9a506", "2021366343b4481917574080", "502f5ab5f7ff203d664d52c6" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 55 }, "mean_correctness": 36.75, "total_correctness": 147, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.071703935, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 28, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q064", "question": "What was Microsoft Corporation's gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated from its Income Statements?", "reference": "Microsoft Corporation's gross margin was 68.69% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated as Gross margin ($47,833 million) divided by Total revenue ($69,632 million).", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000950170-25-010491", "section": "Part I - Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements - Income Statements", "exact_quote": "|             Gross margin | **47833** | 42397 | **93319** | 82612 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "95cc9bbaaa010e6878e37378", "4d369f73b315b1c3b0d0b6d5", "b19c838e5a897f961d83fbfa", "66583ee0478247de96c1e6ae" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 92 }, "mean_correctness": 96.75, "total_correctness": 387, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.041433465, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 17, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q065", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues compared to the prior-year period?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenues grew by 19.72% year-over-year, rising from $8,423 million in the quarter ended December 24, 2023 to $10,084 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2024.", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000804328-25-000011", "section": "Part I - Note 7. Segment Information", "exact_quote": "Total QCT revenues | $10084 | $8423 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "b1c3a78f9b32330e1685fbab", "ddc1ab1508f6a86e67fd7c5c", "3e41af7a51ce3d5dbdb217d0", "eb05b3d3ea8580d4d38bf80d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 73, "total_correctness": 292, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09747838, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q066", "question": "Comparing NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025) and Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024), which company achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points did its operating margin exceed the other's?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation achieved a higher operating margin of 62.42% (Operating income $81,453 million on revenue of $130,497 million), exceeding Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin of 32.00% (Operating income $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion) by 30.42 percentage points (or 3,042 basis points).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Operating income | 81453 | 32972 | 4224 |" }, { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations Table", "exact_quote": "| Operating income | $84293 | $112390 | $28097 | 33% |\n| Operating margin | 27% | 32% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "223c156cffee35cf4d88f201", "fdd1465f2802cabb9b80e12e", "aab649c74f5f13442a94dadb", "c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 20, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 80, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 31.25, "total_correctness": 125, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.120504995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 2, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ] }, { "id": "Q067", "question": "Comparing Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Free Cash Flow generated by the two companies, and which company generated more Free Cash Flow?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc. generated $72,764 million ($72.764 billion) in Free Cash Flow (operating cash flow of $125,299 million minus CapEx of $52,535 million), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. generated $38,219 million ($38.219 billion). Alphabet generated $34,545 million ($34.545 billion) more Free Cash Flow than Amazon in 2024.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "Purchases of property and equipment | (31485) | (32251) | (52535) |" }, { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Free Cash Flow Table", "exact_quote": "| Free cash flow | $36813 | $38219 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "6f66ce0783853753b31cc2a6", "a63ae5f8fd2eb30ce8e86f9d", "fd9dba3cfc5c3cb3bc43b3ab", "eefc612c8d20ad61dc49eada" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 5, "total_correctness": 20, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09292714, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 33, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q068", "question": "Comparing Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which company dedicated a higher percentage of its revenue to Research and Development (R&D intensity), and what was the difference in percentage points?", "reference": "Intel Corporation had a substantially higher R&D intensity of 31.07% ($16.5 billion R&D on $53.1 billion revenue) compared to NVIDIA Corporation's R&D intensity of 9.90% ($12,914 million R&D on $130,497 million revenue). Intel's R&D intensity was 21.17 percentage points higher than NVIDIA's.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "In 2024, we invested $16.5 billion in R&D, made gross capital investments of $25.1 billion" }, { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|         Research and development | 12914 | 8675 | 7339 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "6847e4e589bd93446ee8922a", "93364fc046db8d81d7b72a85", "2f21deccbac57c1c1f726d81", "9899539d51238ce4101e98e8" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 5, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 8, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 5 }, "mean_correctness": 9.5, "total_correctness": 38, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.104659625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q069", "question": "Comparing year-over-year revenue growth rates between NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs FY2024) and Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs FY2023), what was the difference in growth rates?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation grew its revenue by 114.20% (rising from $60,922M to $130,497M), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. grew its net sales by 10.99% (rising from $574,785M to $637,959M). NVIDIA's growth rate was 103.21 percentage points higher than Amazon's.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "| Revenue | $130497 | $60922 | Up 114% |" }, { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|       Total net sales | 513983 | 574785 | 637959 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "7bf7c73d4b75a016d70f0ddf", "5e31f56a2bcb48f68c46ce76", "b1f39bedcb2a16f5657aa34f", "e54b74234a9cdba836026089" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 30, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 36.5, "total_correctness": 146, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.12719967, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 33, "flags": [ "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q070", "question": "Comparing Citigroup Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which institution generated higher total net revenues, and by what dollar amount?", "reference": "Citigroup Inc. generated $81,139 million in total revenues net of interest expense, whereas The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. generated $53,512 million in total net revenues. Citigroup generated $27,627 million ($27.627 billion) more net revenue than Goldman Sachs in 2024.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000831001-25-000067", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Executive Summary Table", "exact_quote": "| **Revenues, net of interest expense** | $**81139** | $78462 | $75338 | $71884 | $75501 |\n| Operating expenses | **53984** | 56366 | 51292 | 48193 | 44374 |" }, { "accession": "0000886982-25-000005", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Net Revenues Table", "exact_quote": "| **Total net revenues** | $**53512** | $46254 | $47365 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "f32ae8e92bcd8adae54fbe52", "ea01f59430c781303b6908e4", "c41f7c08a1aeec8ad6761e4e", "88194dc15a115107c096b142" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 25, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 8, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 12, "total_correctness": 48, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09921765, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "invalid_tool_arguments", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q071", "question": "Comparing energy giants Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Total revenues and other income between them?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $56,953 million for ConocoPhillips. Marathon Petroleum generated $83,459 million ($83.459 billion) more in total revenues and other income than ConocoPhillips.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001510295-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001510295-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Total revenues and other income | 140412 | 150307 | (9895) | 179952 | (29645) |" }, { "accession": "0001163165-25-000012", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "Total Revenues and Other Income | **56953** | 58574 | 82156 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "376a1ca3e286eaa21597afcf", "4aaf71ef429d27bde31ab8f1", "e52aeeef49443af1432ba401", "38fd90fe4f62351ee64451ae" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 5, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 51.25, "total_correctness": 205, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.085820465, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q072", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which software/information provider achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. achieved an operating margin of 31.35% ($6,741 million operating income on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding Morningstar, Inc.'s operating margin of 21.30% ($484.8 million operating income on $2,275.1 million revenue) by 10.05 percentage points.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001289419-25-000041" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|
Operating income | 6741 | 6650 | 6098 |" }, { "accession": "0001289419-25-000041", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Key Metrics Table", "exact_quote": "| Operating margin | 21.3% | 11.3% | 10.0 pp |" } ], "case_ids": [ "20a15e8bd9bbc7956b9ea239", "86aaff29bd6e4ae92765345c", "6fbdf0c834d50d2b72c63a8b", "3cd58ee35d71ccf020e3e57a" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 25, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 8 }, "mean_correctness": 9.5, "total_correctness": 38, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.107947925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q073", "question": "Comparing Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation in 2024, what was the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation generated $27,673 million in net cash provided by operating activities in 2024, compared to $835 million for Whirlpool Corporation, a difference of $26,838 million ($26.838 billion) in favor of Comcast.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001166691-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001166691-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "Net cash provided by operating activities | $**27673** | $28501 |" }, { "accession": "0000106640-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "|       Operating activities | $**835** | $915 | $1390 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "3795af85e06b52207917252e", "0c237d26e590f08cc4c3f3bb", "0e5a248ee0e7c6337278b297", "d335e32110e69a5b9bf1473c" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 20 }, "mean_correctness": 32.5, "total_correctness": 130, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.123022395, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q074", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which technology firm recorded a higher gross profit margin percentage, and what was the percentage point difference?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. recorded a gross profit margin of 89.04% ($19,147 million gross profit on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin of 74.99% (reported 75.0%) ($97,858 million on $130,497 million revenue) by 14.05 percentage points.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|
Gross profit | 19147 | 17055 | 15441 |" }, { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "| Gross profit | 97858 | 44301 | 15356 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "44b13a21cd4b4cf7f28bffa3", "6f6e3589fb0fedd3184f9272", "3d14ab46c96461490dc60f98", "f79010a44e645e235621c4a9" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 25, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 40, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 41.25, "total_correctness": 165, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.120877665, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q075", "question": "Comparing Exelon Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in total revenues reported by the two companies?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Total operating revenues of $23,028 million, whereas C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported Total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand ($17,725 million). Exelon's revenues exceeded C.H. Robinson's by $5,303 million.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0001109357-25-000043", "0001043277-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001109357-25-000043", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "|         Total operating revenues | 23028 | 21727 | 19078 |" }, { "accession": "0001043277-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview Table", "exact_quote": "Total revenues | 17724956 | | 17596443 | | 24696625 | |" } ], "case_ids": [ "14c93caa96414136301c505a", "8176e781bfb2549f2288dfbf", "114bc29344d4dd1f9e1c74e8", "b5600b3e77bff6c31a5b128f" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 20, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 13.75, "total_correctness": 55, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.110839325, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q076", "question": "Cross-referencing Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K: What was the total gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares sold directly by Mr. Shriram at $205/share on January 31, 2025, and what fraction of Alphabet's 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 did this sale represent?", "reference": "The gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares was $2,870,000 (14,000 shares * $205 per share). Dividing 14,000 shares by Alphabet's 5,833,000,000 Class A shares outstanding yields approximately 0.00024% of the total outstanding Class A shares.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000950170-25-011901", "section": "Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned", "exact_quote": "14000 | D | $205 | 301532 | D |" }, { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Cover Page - Shares Outstanding", "exact_quote": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of the Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding." } ], "case_ids": [ "1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4", "be750d11f28745df1dd20156", "3e580c187c15e50815598e3a", "3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 92 }, "mean_correctness": 92.25, "total_correctness": 369, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07595014, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q077", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what percentage of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from Service and other revenue versus Product revenue?", "reference": "Service and other revenue represented 76.71% ($53,413 million) of total revenue ($69,632 million), while Product revenue represented 23.29% ($16,219 million).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000950170-25-010491", "section": "Part I - Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements - Income Statements", "exact_quote": "|         Product | $**16219** | $18941 | $**31491** | $34476 |\n|         Service and other | **53413** | 43079 | **103726** | 84061 |\n|             Total revenue | **69632** | 62020 | **135217** | 118537 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "c40e242278f20f516a19b1dd", "0b5a5ae323060c936d1b28e3", "6fb5178a87f45f2c1b949109", "d80254ce6e11330f667418a8" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 98.25, "total_correctness": 393, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07035604, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 24, "flags": [] }, { "id": "Q078", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what percentage of Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream was generated specifically by Handsets?", "reference": "Handsets generated 75.11% of total QCT revenues ($7,574 million out of $10,084 million).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000804328-25-000011", "section": "Part I - Note 7. Segment Information", "exact_quote": "| Handsets (1) | $7574 | $6687 |\n| Automotive (2) | 961 | 598 |\n| IoT (internet of things) (3) | 1549 | 1138 |\n|       Total QCT revenues | $10084 | $8423 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "3dca8fca2dcf3bbc754d9247", "a05be6cfb8b6dc8ec6073f0b", "c6dd8ac18ba1585acf510666", "b7da1bf0bb46a3ad9cfb354f" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 92, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 93, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 94.5, "total_correctness": 378, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.103126495, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q079", "question": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025, what were the two tranches of senior notes issued, including their respective interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount?", "reference": "Ford Motor Credit Company LLC issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and (2) $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, representing a combined aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000,000 ($2.5 billion).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001104659-25-001594" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001104659-25-001594", "section": "Item 8.01. Other Events", "exact_quote": "Company LLC (the \"Company\") issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 (the \"2029 Notes\") and (2) $1,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2" } ], "case_ids": [ "7eccfec231eaf53b721c256f", "144e00066c63b99e12b245fe", "c5965728c831064c5a97c49d", "2744c89bc98dcc42d5baee64" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 74.5, "total_correctness": 298, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.061499065, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q080", "question": "What information was furnished by PepsiCo, Inc. under Item 2.02 in its Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025?", "reference": "PepsiCo, Inc. furnished its public press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, attached as Exhibit 99.1.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000077476-25-000008" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000077476-25-000008", "section": "Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition", "exact_quote": "**Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.**\n\nThe information in this Item 2.02, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, is being furnished" } ], "case_ids": [ "b7f8588e92e220e898985f34", "958d7c13bd1c59c45590e805", "5c12e33799390f028a9dfdaf", "cebbe62dfa53229fdd828bc1" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 60, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 25, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 30, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 82 }, "mean_correctness": 49.25, "total_correctness": 197, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07766581, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q081", "question": "What event was disclosed by Pfizer Inc. under Item 2.02 of its Form 8-K filed in February 2025?", "reference": "Pfizer Inc. furnished its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2024 and 2025 financial guidance under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000078003-25-000017" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000078003-25-000017", "section": "Item Information", "exact_quote": "**ITEM INFORMATION**: Results of Operations and Financial Condition" } ], "case_ids": [ "a1e0fc5368a30bb557dcb781", "7c18f7f5f02b2b702ff094a6", "6976a573027830f3e8748451", "c2254f8242188e52a2c4d780" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 80, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 78, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 75, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 65 }, "mean_correctness": 74.5, "total_correctness": 298, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.050756785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q082", "question": "Under what regulation and item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K disclosure?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its disclosure under Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000829224-25-000006", "section": "Item 7.01", "exact_quote": "**Item 7.01    Regulation FD Disclosure.**" } ], "case_ids": [ "32a3ae4b6addeddb694566d9", "b9475812a0624e004f226aa3", "d82ad3fa2edef0ec81461bf0", "aec23329645410bf24b398bb" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 50, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 60, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 60, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 45, "total_correctness": 180, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.05007394, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 27, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q083", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million) was contributed by its Digital Media segment ($15.86 billion)?", "reference": "Digital Media segment revenue ($15.86 billion = $15,860 million) represented 73.75% of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "Total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024" }, { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|       Total revenue | 21505 | 19409 | 17606 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "0ae65eceddfd45d4fc192d28", "d0968e12be2aa067113993f1", "34b8fcf7919029e40be86986", "bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 85, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 93.75, "total_correctness": 375, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08085685, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 25, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q084", "question": "By what percentage did Intel Corporation's Intel Foundry external revenue decline in 2024 compared to 2023, and what factors caused the decline?", "reference": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - A Year in Review", "exact_quote": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023 due to lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales." } ], "case_ids": [ "29c5201b447ae77e1e9c36e1", "205e385f4f21ba1d73c0c012", "d4ab7b5628f73acc11a8f269", "d69d4a403a26664ab11a3d21" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 98, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 100, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 100 }, "mean_correctness": 99, "total_correctness": 396, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.104101565, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q085", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Comcast Corporation's total revenue ($123,731 million) was absorbed by Programming and production expenses ($37,026 million)?", "reference": "Programming and production expenses absorbed 29.92% of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in 2024 ($37,026 million divided by $123,731 million).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001166691-25-000011", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|    Programming and production | **37026** | 36762 | 38213 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "16eabc57b1b1d059d7272465", "b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff", "1953d4a83dbd288a980090fb", "7b11e298d4fd9c82193ccb33" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 96, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 72, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 60 }, "mean_correctness": 79.5, "total_correctness": 318, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.06172343, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt", "invalid_tool_arguments", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q086", "question": "Calculate Citigroup Inc.'s effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024, and state its variance in basis points from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.", "reference": "Citigroup Inc.'s effective tax rate in 2024 was 24.70% (Income taxes of $4,211 million divided by Pre-tax income of $17,046 million), which is 370 basis points (3.70 percentage points) above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.00%.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000831001-25-000067", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Results of Operations Table", "exact_quote": "| **Income from continuing operations before income taxes** | $**17046** | $12910 | $18807 | $27469 | $13632 |\n| Income taxes | **4211** | 3528 | 3642 | 5451 | 2525 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "056084b4ef07c21fd66063fc", "3eb53904f28c62b2b4a220af", "9ec721f9a007a1c05d6b2f72", "b898fb9916012146b1b4f2fb" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 93, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 40, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 45 }, "mean_correctness": 68.25, "total_correctness": 273, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.05246568, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q087", "question": "What was Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.'s operating expense ratio in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Total expenses divided by Total revenues?", "reference": "Innovative Industrial Properties recorded an operating expense ratio of 44.32% in 2024, calculated as Total expenses ($136,723 thousand) divided by Total revenues ($308,517 thousand).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001558370-25-001322" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001558370-25-001322", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|     Total revenues | 308517 | 309506 | (989) |" } ], "case_ids": [ "f319e60071a51f182fce5459", "461932050b54a6e93dbd47e4", "9c9e22bcde869926d4566ffa", "e56a5a13519b0a525faf6a99" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 10 }, "mean_correctness": 5, "total_correctness": 20, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07859115500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q088", "question": "For Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, what were the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024?", "reference": "Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF incurred $770 thousand in gross expenses (consisting entirely of the related-party Sponsor's Fee) from July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0000950170-25-029407" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000950170-25-029407", "section": "Item 8. Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "Sponsor's Fee, related party | 770 |\n| **Gross expenses** | 770 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "0a0644921ded167414f2e401", "fc38f5c7b0bdff40a20e3ade", "053b5708806734f5b9355451", "b3d1b3858d356a01161c80b0" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 20 }, "mean_correctness": 6.25, "total_correctness": 25, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.05308802, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 26, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q089", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Income from operations divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin was 4.18% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Income from operations ($58,906 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001739566-25-000053", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Income from operations | 58906 | 16017 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "52452178256480051a95ec00", "aa5b53af45c6810e59c3908c", "2e16201faf506aad76a9400a", "d50a54d04d327afc290d582f" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 0, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 0, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 0 }, "mean_correctness": 2.5, "total_correctness": 10, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.068466095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 33, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q090", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue ($3,071,663 thousand) was contributed by Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "Travel Solutions contributed 89.36% ($2,744,844 thousand) and Hospitality Solutions contributed 10.64% ($326,819 thousand) of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue in 2024.", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "filing_accessions": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001597033-25-000027", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Segment Results of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Travel Solutions | $2744844 | $2642077 | $102767 | 4% |\n| Hospitality Solutions | 326819 | 304169 | 22650 | 7% |\n|     Total segment revenue | 3071663 | 2946246 | 125417 | 4% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "eeeaeca9a31dd32f9d7f942e", "da0a1a0aea84d9897f2f0556", "f994d8118f2493d5b3fc88e0", "38da79c72f2f667f8a64b613" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 97, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 10, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 98 }, "mean_correctness": 75, "total_correctness": 300, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.0712226, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q091", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, how much stock-based compensation expense was recognized across fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, and by what percentage did this expense increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025?", "reference": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023. Between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, stock-based compensation increased by $1,188 million, representing an increase of 33.47% (or approximately 33.5%).", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows", "exact_quote": "|         Stock-based compensation expense | 4737 | 3549 | 2709 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "b302630b8e79fef0d09c8135", "69bb7d46fd487063e54abb64", "a666d1bbf222e9aedbe01231", "1582cf7913969b4c5eee2b2b" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 5, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 97, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 20, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 54.5, "total_correctness": 218, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.086136785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q092", "question": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the company's revenue growth rate in fiscal year 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding the effect of hedging) compared to its reported GAAP revenue growth rate?", "reference": "On a constant currency basis excluding the effect of hedging, Alphabet's revenues increased 15% year over year in 2024, compared to a reported GAAP consolidated revenue increase of 14% year over year (reaching $350.0 billion). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations slightly reduced reported GAAP revenue growth.", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Constant Currency Revenues", "exact_quote": "Total constant currency revenues, which exclude the effect of hedging, increased 15% year over year." }, { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "• Revenues were $350.0 billion, an increase of 14% year over year" } ], "case_ids": [ "7a226c7d300dc82efb1daac7", "2f08f1cfef76c819011e534f", "4ad2a75aa523812e0293573c", "ff0185e16a6ceaa1898f8fad" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 92 }, "mean_correctness": 93.5, "total_correctness": 374, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.07546905500000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 23, "flags": [ "other", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q093", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total dollar amount of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets recognized during fiscal year 2024, and which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible?", "reference": "Intel recognized $3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets during fiscal year 2024, which were primarily related to Mobileye.", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "currency", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Overview", "exact_quote": "$3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain of our reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets" } ], "case_ids": [ "ed7fbcc33ca2aac380a6a32c", "6c10c47ff28a8c000f678d14", "9a678b3cf45c712e983d75bf", "c8f934cb7052ccc259b79719" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 55, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 50, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 85, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 55 }, "mean_correctness": 61.25, "total_correctness": 245, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.114765375, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 30, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q094", "question": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K Non-GAAP reconciliations, what were the company's Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars) and Adjusted Gross Profit Margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022?", "reference": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's Non-GAAP reconciliations, Adjusted gross profits and Adjusted gross profit margins were: for 2024, $2,765,014 thousand (15.6%); for 2023, $2,604,608 thousand (14.8%); and for 2022, $3,593,177 thousand (14.5%).", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001043277-25-000012", "section": "Item 7. Non-GAAP Reconciliations - Adjusted Gross Profit", "exact_quote": "| **Adjusted gross profits/Adjusted gross profit margin** | $2765014 | 15.6% | $2604608 | 14.8% | $3593177 | 14.5% |" } ], "case_ids": [ "e685109116635e40706cfe08", "4612e6cdf8b1f263b161a6eb", "10c44535487f9ba946cbe8a1", "2db60abb23cf99b46c9a015f" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 10, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 12, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 15 }, "mean_correctness": 10.5, "total_correctness": 42, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.09698135000000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 32, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q095", "question": "According to Note 4 (Leases) in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years, what was the total imputed interest, and what was the resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet's undiscounted total future operating lease payments totaled $17,038 million, less imputed interest of $(2,460) million, resulting in a total operating lease liability balance of $14,578 million (plus $1,677 million for finance lease liabilities from $1,888 million payments less $211 million imputed interest).", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 8. Note 4. Leases - Lease Liabilities Table", "exact_quote": "|     Total future lease payments | 17038 | 1888 |\n| Less imputed interest | (2460) | (211) |\n|     Total lease liability balance | $14578 | $1677 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "ec6331cc0cbe0a01f21613ba", "d7da12a715b1065f2e275a10", "6bb01d52c86334ceb19e1f15", "8d0c56a240df6dd2b4edf232" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 98, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 95.5, "total_correctness": 382, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.057262035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 17, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ] }, { "id": "Q096", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, exactly how many individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems and standalone B200 GPUs were manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers during fiscal year 2025?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K mentions Blackwell architecture systems (specifically GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36, and B200) exclusively in the context of US export licensing regulations and trade restrictions, and does not disclose specific unit shipment quantities, production counts, or customer delivery numbers for any Blackwell products.", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "filing_accessions": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001045810-25-000023", "section": "Item 1. Business - Regulatory and Export Controls", "exact_quote": "Blackwell systems, such as GB200 NVL 72 and NVL 36 as well as B200 are also subject to these requirements and therefore require a license for any shipment to certain entities and to China and Country Groups D1, D4 and D5, excluding Israel." } ], "case_ids": [ "b924f52c94a8ca9e08142043", "6eb059b80919ef5bd22fb8c6", "2483cd8c777ffd514e33199d", "8c75816556db6ef36c2bd621" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 96, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 95 }, "mean_correctness": 95.25, "total_correctness": 381, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.104480385, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 29, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q097", "question": "What is Alphabet Inc.'s projected revenue and net income guidance for fiscal year 2027 as provided in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K does not provide long-term quantitative financial guidance or projections for fiscal year 2027. The filing contains a standard cautionary disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 but explicitly refrains from issuing forward multi-year revenue or profit targets.", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "filing_accessions": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001652044-25-000014", "section": "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Forward-Looking Statements", "exact_quote": "**Note About Forward-Looking Statements**\n\nThis Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995." } ], "case_ids": [ "dfd8bab819ff8b556cea6687", "d08947086f93fd2fe4a87f6b", "084d7ec7eac6a73d5b791118", "ac82d7f16ead6727c32ca467" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 88, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 95 }, "mean_correctness": 91.25, "total_correctness": 365, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.06550784999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 25, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q098", "question": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was Amazon's total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Amazon.com, Inc. reports net sales aggregated on an annual basis ($637,959 million total in 2024, consisting of $272,311 million in net product sales and $365,648 million in net service sales) and quarterly segment disclosures, but does not report monthly breakdown of sales in its Form 10-K.", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "filing_accessions": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0001018724-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Operations", "exact_quote": "| Net product sales | $242901 | $255887 | $272311 |\n| Net service sales | 271082 | 318898 | 365648 |\n|       Total net sales | 513983 | 574785 | 637959 |" } ], "case_ids": [ "c8e7813c6d51337bf094cb57", "b754fee86ed7ab791a40c940", "9280e5f7895b1003cc5effc9", "e015466502a458cdbe9b3078" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 95, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 92, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 95, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 96 }, "mean_correctness": 94.5, "total_correctness": 378, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.110717655, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q099", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the dividend per share amount paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / No dividend paid. Intel Corporation suspended its quarterly common stock dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and therefore paid $0.00 dividend per share for Q4 2024. Furthermore, Intel agreed under its commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the subsequent two years.", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "filing_accessions": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000050863-25-000009", "section": "Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity - Dividends", "exact_quote": "suspended in the fourth quarter of 2024, our quarterly dividend. Further, we agreed under our commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the next two years, and agreed to limitations on the payment of dividends for the three years thereafter." } ], "case_ids": [ "9ef6ac0a67ccbceb11e9a62d", "ded1cd4ca972f3e553634b80", "bd75f8981bf49c6980efc301", "c82a92b261c42ff0ca28205d" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 80, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 80, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 5, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 45 }, "mean_correctness": 52.5, "total_correctness": 210, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08469456, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] }, { "id": "Q100", "question": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, what was the final completed cash purchase price paid by Adobe to acquire Figma, Inc.?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Transaction terminated. Adobe Inc. never completed the acquisition of Figma, Inc. The merger agreement was mutually terminated in December 2023 due to regulatory obstacles, and instead Adobe paid Figma a $1,000 million ($1 billion) acquisition termination fee, as shown on its Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2024.", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "filing_accessions": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "evidence": [ { "accession": "0000796343-25-000004", "section": "Item 8. Consolidated Statements of Income", "exact_quote": "|   Acquisition termination fee | 1000 | | |" } ], "case_ids": [ "d729f9b1ed8631d4773463de", "00cc7f10521ea1e8ae9c4e86", "7bc958789d6f168b1056a685", "303c34852ff3d9775f2e3102" ], "scores": { "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql": 88, "google/gemini-3.8-flash|sql_streaming": 90, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql": 80, "openai/gpt-6-luna|sql_streaming": 75 }, "mean_correctness": 83.25, "total_correctness": 333, "scored": 4, "expected": 4, "known_cost_usd": 0.08960557999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "tool_requested": 31, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ] } ], "cases": [ { "task_id": "7df8a4f2b4f81b7f8a15fae9", "question_id": "Q001", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What is the par value and trading symbol of Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and trades under the ticker symbol GOOGL on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024; Filing Accession/file_stem: `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Par value:** **$0.001** per share (stated as *\"Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value\"*)\n* **Trading symbol:** **GOOGL**", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states the par value ($0.001) and the trading symbol (GOOGL), matching the reference. It omits the exchange name (Nasdaq Stock Market LLC), but the question asks only for par value and symbol, so this is not a material gap. The cited accession 0001652044-25-000014, the file ID sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the fiscal year end all appear in the tool output. The quoted cover-page line 'Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value | GOOGL | Nasdaq Stock Market LLC' matches the retrieved text exactly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0130273, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0120765, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009508, "wall_seconds": 14.588019963999614, "api_seconds": 13.891961293002169, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 21590, "completion_tokens": 804, "reasoning_tokens": 257, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/7df8a4f2b4f81b7f8a15fae9.json", "detail_js": "details/7df8a4f2b4f81b7f8a15fae9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7df8a4f2b4f81b7f8a15fae9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2caa0c27a7914c11909650e06eb672b5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f746cd498c1641c6a4e49502c508e674.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4767b1a9ca76cfa9f3b73730", "question_id": "Q001", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is the par value and trading symbol of Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and trades under the ticker symbol GOOGL on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, File Stem: `0001652044-25-000014`):\n\n* **Title of class:** Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value\n* **Par value:** **$0.001** per share\n* **Trading symbol:** **GOOGL**", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the par value ($0.001) and trading symbol (GOOGL), matching the reference. The read_filing output shows the cover-page table listing 'Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value' with trading symbol GOOGL, and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is in the same text. The file ID and accession cited trace to the duckdb and read_filing outputs. The candidate omits the Nasdaq exchange named in the reference, but the question did not ask for it, so the deduction is minor.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01923275, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01794225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012905, "wall_seconds": 20.06748102200072, "api_seconds": 18.691488962998847, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31503, "completion_tokens": 1065, "reasoning_tokens": 331, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/4767b1a9ca76cfa9f3b73730.json", "detail_js": "details/4767b1a9ca76cfa9f3b73730.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4767b1a9ca76cfa9f3b73730.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cbea7e753b344b6395f882b6f730f173.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b3f07c4426b04e1fab1a9eeaf868da96.request.json" }, { "task_id": "992c0ad547a4b81de10eb650", "question_id": "Q001", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What is the par value and trading symbol of Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and trades under the ticker symbol GOOGL on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet Inc.’s Class A Common Stock has a par value of **$0.001 per share** and trades under the symbol **GOOGL**.\n\nSource: Alphabet Inc. 2024 Form 10-K cover page, file_stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` (cover-page table in the filing text).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the par value ($0.001) and trading symbol (GOOGL), matching the reference and the cover-page table quoted in the tool output. It omits the exchange (Nasdaq Stock Market LLC), but the question did not ask for it, so this is a minor completeness gap. The cited file_stem and parquet file ID match the tool outputs, and the tool's cover-page text directly supports both values.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00185912, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00095312, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.000906, "wall_seconds": 16.375122980000015, "api_seconds": 15.762618577997273, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 18714, "completion_tokens": 707, "reasoning_tokens": 234, "cache_read_tokens": 5522, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/992c0ad547a4b81de10eb650.json", "detail_js": "details/992c0ad547a4b81de10eb650.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/992c0ad547a4b81de10eb650.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/99b30c21e8d74c0f937e4964a751f1d6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c8fd9d7fd059418e842b85ccff773950.request.json" }, { "task_id": "69227e6d31c6c399d39aebe9", "question_id": "Q001", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is the par value and trading symbol of Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Class A Common Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and trades under the ticker symbol GOOGL on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence does not include Alphabet Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K cover page, so I can’t verify the Class A Common Stock’s par value or trading symbol from the filing.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value, ticker GOOGL on Nasdaq Stock Market LLC. The candidate abstains, claiming the cover page is not in the returned evidence. That claim is accurate for the outputs it cites, since no returned passage contains the cover page. However, the tool results list accession 0001652044-25-000014 (char_count 436,515, the largest February 2025 filing for CIK 1652044), which is the filing the gold evidence quotes. The candidate never opened it with read_filing, so the abstention rests on an incomplete search rather than on unanswerability. Missing evidence in its own search does not make the question unanswerable, so the candidate gets little credit on correctness. Citation support is moderate because the statement that the retrieved outputs lack the cover page is consistent with the tool evidence, but the candidate offers no citation for any answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004622385, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002988185, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016342, "wall_seconds": 37.88246536200131, "api_seconds": 35.25833127700207, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59107, "completion_tokens": 1544, "reasoning_tokens": 697, "cache_read_tokens": 27836, "excerpt_characters": 8695, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-012415", "0000950170-25-020581", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-020620", "0000950170-25-021536", "0000950170-25-021555", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022825", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-023879", "0000950170-25-025147", "0000950170-25-028107", "0000950170-25-028131", "0000950170-25-029764", "0001415889-25-003895", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001950047-25-000965", "0001950047-25-000967", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/69227e6d31c6c399d39aebe9.json", "detail_js": "details/69227e6d31c6c399d39aebe9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/69227e6d31c6c399d39aebe9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cdd36f5a818e4bd89d03a7ab42364302.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/00c20024fa3e4e2e9622051ed1f93027.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d260bd067f8603398727a29a", "question_id": "Q002", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, how many shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C stock were outstanding as of January 28, 2025?", "reference": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024; Accession Number / `file_stem`: `0001652044-25-000014`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the number of shares outstanding as of **January 28, 2025** was:\n\n* **Class A stock:** **5,833 million** shares (5,833,000,000 shares)\n* **Class B stock:** **860 million** shares (860,000,000 shares)\n* **Class C stock:** **5,497 million** shares (5,497,000,000 shares)", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports Class A 5,833 million, Class B 860 million, and Class C 5,497 million as of January 28, 2025, matching the reference exactly. The unit conversions to full share counts are arithmetically correct. The accession number 0001652044-25-000014 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are supported by the tool output, which includes the cover page sentence with these figures. The candidate's claim that the filing is the 2024 10-K is also supported by the SEC header in the tool output. The small deduction reflects the candidate's extra file-level identifiers, which are supported but not needed to answer the question.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01758615, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01657875, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010074, "wall_seconds": 19.406695958001364, "api_seconds": 18.04254228500031, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27179, "completion_tokens": 1000, "reasoning_tokens": 148, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/d260bd067f8603398727a29a.json", "detail_js": "details/d260bd067f8603398727a29a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d260bd067f8603398727a29a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9139ccc274f04d02a2b16b9e4ef2f40f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e69652e03b1d4d57893b79f365c8deaf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dcd393ba5198971309c88499", "question_id": "Q002", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, how many shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C stock were outstanding as of January 28, 2025?", "reference": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, file stem: `0001652044-25-000014`), the number of shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 was:\n\n* **Class A stock:** **5,833 million** shares (5,833,000,000)\n* **Class B stock:** **860 million** shares (860,000,000)\n* **Class C stock:** **5,497 million** shares (5,497,000,000)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's share counts (Class A 5,833M, Class B 860M, Class C 5,497M) match the reference and the exact quote from the read_filing tool output for accession 0001652044-25-000014, dated January 28, 2025. The expanded figures (5,833,000,000, etc.) are correct unit conversions. The cited file and accession are consistent with the tool evidence. The earlier failed queries did not affect the final answer, which is directly supported by the retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02551005, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02402775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014823, "wall_seconds": 23.734809068000686, "api_seconds": 22.408533024998178, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41545, "completion_tokens": 1063, "reasoning_tokens": 260, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/dcd393ba5198971309c88499.json", "detail_js": "details/dcd393ba5198971309c88499.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dcd393ba5198971309c88499.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c298ef65a1e1409f8479ad4efccb739d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/59bac4e4cd994dc4ac94e6b3b6366cd2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b9c419d7814a4d51555584d2", "question_id": "Q002", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, how many shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C stock were outstanding as of January 28, 2025?", "reference": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t verify the share counts from the available filing text: the text-read queries for the likely February 2025 filings failed because their filing IDs were duplicated in the source. I therefore can’t provide reliable Class A, Class B, and Class C counts.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the gold evidence (the cover-page quote giving 5,833M Class A, 860M Class B, and 5,497M Class C shares as of January 28, 2025), so abstention does not earn full credit. The candidate supplies no share counts, so it captures almost none of the required content, though it does not state any wrong figures. Its citation support is strong: the tool outputs do show the search returned only filings under filer-agent accessions and that the follow-up reads failed with 'Duplicate filing ID in source'. Nothing in the tool evidence contains the cover-page quote, so the candidate's statement that it cannot verify the counts is accurate as far as the evidence goes.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00190465, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00106325, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008414, "wall_seconds": 28.13964016599857, "api_seconds": 27.488049445999422, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 22965, "completion_tokens": 1350, "reasoning_tokens": 689, "cache_read_tokens": 13015, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-012415", "0000950170-25-020581", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-020620", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/b9c419d7814a4d51555584d2.json", "detail_js": "details/b9c419d7814a4d51555584d2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b9c419d7814a4d51555584d2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f86786890f3645fcaca4ce7e5c1ca747.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5e9fc0822e3a414ba262c1cc33e655f2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "de8520c95cad8fc7d4507ffe", "question_id": "Q002", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, how many shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C stock were outstanding as of January 28, 2025?", "reference": "As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding, 860 million shares of Alphabet's Class B stock outstanding, and 5,497 million shares of Alphabet's Class C stock outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet reported **5,833 million Class A shares**, **860 million Class B shares**, and **5,497 million Class C shares** outstanding as of January 28, 2025.\n\n**Source:** Alphabet Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K, accession/file_stem `0001652044-25-000014`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; cover-page passage at character offsets 6,310–18,310.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same figures as the reference and gold evidence: 5,833M Class A, 860M Class B, and 5,497M Class C shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025. The units (millions) and date match. The cited accession 0001652044-25-000014, the file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the cover-page offsets 6,310-18,310 all match the read_filing tool output, which contains the quoted sentence. The candidate's only deviation is minor wording normalization of the Class C sentence, which does not change meaning.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003694095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001878195, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018159, "wall_seconds": 22.73073210900111, "api_seconds": 21.70987497599708, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 47289, "completion_tokens": 827, "reasoning_tokens": 185, "cache_read_tokens": 19162, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/de8520c95cad8fc7d4507ffe.json", "detail_js": "details/de8520c95cad8fc7d4507ffe.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/de8520c95cad8fc7d4507ffe.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e64112f20c34a7faa6e3b690d09d0d6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/67359a8fb1e24f6a85cd3a15f165696b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9ff309fe4aac85f4fabb5b2d", "question_id": "Q003", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is the independent registered public accounting firm for Amazon.com, Inc., and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Amazon.com, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1996.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0001018724-25-000004`, File: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP**\n* **Year Served Since:** **1996**\n\nIn the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* (dated February 6, 2025, Seattle, Washington), Ernst & Young LLP states:\n> *\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1996.\"*", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: Ernst & Young LLP, auditor since 1996. The accession number, the exact quote, and the February 6, 2025 Seattle report date all appear in the tool output (the SQL substring at offset 162200). The only unsupported detail is the 'fiscal year ended December 31, 2024' label, which the tool results never state explicitly. It is a reasonable inference from the February 2025 filing date but is not directly cited, so citation support is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01244355, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01183125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0006123, "wall_seconds": 21.8628818899997, "api_seconds": 20.388179887999286, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 17358, "completion_tokens": 908, "reasoning_tokens": 211, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/9ff309fe4aac85f4fabb5b2d.json", "detail_js": "details/9ff309fe4aac85f4fabb5b2d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9ff309fe4aac85f4fabb5b2d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ff90b795be5b4799a667067a56c9927d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d25700b0cacd4bdba7f40b96e390b95b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2bc63ba8ec9c8256d00f733b", "question_id": "Q003", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is the independent registered public accounting firm for Amazon.com, Inc., and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Amazon.com, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1996.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Amazon.com, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, File Stem: `0001018724-25-000004`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP** (located in Seattle, Washington)\n* **Year Commenced Serving as Auditor:** **1996**\n\n### Source Citation\nFrom the **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm** (Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements, char offset ~158,500–158,700):\n> \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1996. \n> Seattle, Washington \n> February 6, 2025\"", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on the firm (Ernst & Young LLP) and the start year (1996). The tool output directly supports both: the read_filing text contains \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP\" and \"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1996,\" with Seattle, Washington and February 6, 2025. The accession 0001018724-25-000004 is also confirmed. Minor deductions: the candidate labels the document a \"Form 10-K\", which the tool output does not state explicitly, and its char offset (~158,500–158,700) is an estimate not verified by the returned char_start (154799) plus the position of the quote in the chunk. The quoted text itself is accurate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01713915, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01582425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013149, "wall_seconds": 19.95812277600089, "api_seconds": 18.912858824000068, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28908, "completion_tokens": 1068, "reasoning_tokens": 408, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2bc63ba8ec9c8256d00f733b.json", "detail_js": "details/2bc63ba8ec9c8256d00f733b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2bc63ba8ec9c8256d00f733b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/63bc960acf9b4bc39144f1f3891a47b0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b111f77ea7e94a338ab057b9d757c824.request.json" }, { "task_id": "67283a27e5e87f7567351e2a", "question_id": "Q003", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is the independent registered public accounting firm for Amazon.com, Inc., and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Amazon.com, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1996.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y)**. The 2025 proxy statement says E&Y has served as the company’s independent auditor **since 1996**.\n\n**Evidence:** Filing `0001104659-25-033442`, file `sfd-v1-2025-04.parquet`, SQL result at the passage beginning “ITEM 2—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT…”: it identifies Ernst & Young LLP as the firm appointed for fiscal 2025 and states “E&Y has served as our independent auditor since 1996.”", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1996, matching the reference. Its quoted sentence, 'E&Y has served as our independent auditor since 1996,' appears verbatim in the DEF 14A passage returned by the duckdb_query output, and the fiscal 2025 appointment detail is also in that output, so the citation is well supported by the tool evidence. It cites the 2025 proxy rather than the 10-K quoted in the gold evidence, which is a different source for the same fact, not an error. The answer is slightly less direct than the reference because it attributes the fact to the proxy rather than to the auditor's report, which keeps the score just short of perfect.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00475859, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00305439, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017042, "wall_seconds": 41.69532957700176, "api_seconds": 37.50391541300087, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58666, "completion_tokens": 2019, "reasoning_tokens": 791, "cache_read_tokens": 28119, "excerpt_characters": 10900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001000275-25-000072", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001018724-25-000038", "0001018724-25-000044", "0001018724-25-000052", "0001018724-25-000054", "0001018724-25-000056", "0001018724-25-000058", "0001018724-25-000064", "0001018724-25-000066", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138", "0001104659-25-045097", "0001104659-25-054872", "0001214659-25-008082", "0001950047-25-003323", "0001959173-25-003382", "0001959173-25-003383", "0001959173-25-003421", "0001959173-25-003426", "0002007317-25-000425" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/67283a27e5e87f7567351e2a.json", "detail_js": "details/67283a27e5e87f7567351e2a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/67283a27e5e87f7567351e2a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/66743a3547da46168404b69988913d1d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1a8103b5026f4e3eb26df377572744ef.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b0f0c74f84b3fdd8fd860db0", "question_id": "Q003", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is the independent registered public accounting firm for Amazon.com, Inc., and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Amazon.com, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1996.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y)**. The company’s 2025 proxy statement says E&Y has served as its independent auditor **since 1996**. [2025 proxy statement, file_stem `0001104659-25-033442`, file `sfd-v1-2025-04.parquet`, excerpt at characters 248,248–260,248.]", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and gives 1996 as the start year, matching the reference. Its cited source is the 2025 proxy statement (accession 0001104659-25-033442), not the 10-K the gold evidence cites. The tool output supports the claim: the retrieved text at characters 248,248 to 260,248 says \"E&Y has served as our independent auditor since 1996,\" and the excerpt range matches. The candidate's source is a different filing from the gold evidence, which is why correctness is not 100. The answer itself is complete and accurate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0052017949999999995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002577695, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026241, "wall_seconds": 33.18828943399967, "api_seconds": 29.795637409999472, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 72803, "completion_tokens": 1385, "reasoning_tokens": 547, "cache_read_tokens": 34637, "excerpt_characters": 32885, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001000275-25-000072", "0001018724-25-000026", "0001018724-25-000028", "0001018724-25-000030", "0001018724-25-000032", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001018724-25-000038", "0001018724-25-000044", "0001018724-25-000052", "0001018724-25-000054", "0001018724-25-000056", "0001018724-25-000058", "0001018724-25-000064", "0001018724-25-000066", "0001096906-25-000526", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033447", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-034684", "0001104659-25-034700", "0001104659-25-044138", "0001104659-25-045097", "0001104659-25-054872", "0001214659-25-006154", "0001214659-25-006309", "0001214659-25-006463", "0001214659-25-008082", "0001950047-25-001405", "0001950047-25-003323", "0001959173-25-003382", "0001959173-25-003383", "0001959173-25-003421", "0001959173-25-003426", "0002007317-25-000425" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/b0f0c74f84b3fdd8fd860db0.json", "detail_js": "details/b0f0c74f84b3fdd8fd860db0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b0f0c74f84b3fdd8fd860db0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7a2b7187d1cb4302ba5725455d479e0b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1b3db6afe2ff47a18af412f64128094c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "60992ed75efd02a4bfcf807a", "question_id": "Q004", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "How many shares of common stock did Amazon.com, Inc. have outstanding as of January 29, 2025 as disclosed on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc. had 10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Amazon.com, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0001018724-25-000004`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025:** **10,597,729,352** shares", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure of 10,597,729,352 shares outstanding as of January 29, 2025 matches the reference exactly, with correct date and units. The tool output shows the cover-page row 'Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025 | 10597729352' under scoped file stem 0001018724-25-000004 in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet. The fiscal year end (December 31, 2024) and the filing identifiers are also supported by the retrieved header text. The answer is fully correct and well supported by the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01718895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01618275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010062, "wall_seconds": 17.27200937499947, "api_seconds": 15.800794027001757, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27674, "completion_tokens": 793, "reasoning_tokens": 143, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/60992ed75efd02a4bfcf807a.json", "detail_js": "details/60992ed75efd02a4bfcf807a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/60992ed75efd02a4bfcf807a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fe0db993e74f4a5da861990562601ed2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ac287a847f54ca9b278952043ddf9c0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ce0183c497d92fea15bb6df7", "question_id": "Q004", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many shares of common stock did Amazon.com, Inc. have outstanding as of January 29, 2025 as disclosed on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc. had 10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Amazon.com, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File stem: `0001018724-25-000004`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025:** **10,597,729,352**", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure of 10,597,729,352 shares outstanding as of January 29, 2025 matches the reference exactly and the cover-page table row in the tool output (read_filing, text containing 'Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025 | 10597729352'). The accession 0001018724-25-000004 and file ID sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet match the retrieved record, and the 'fiscal year ended December 31, 2024' detail is supported by the same filing text. The candidate adds comma formatting, which is a presentation change only. Citation support is nearly full; the only minor gap is that the gold evidence's exact quote is a raw unformatted number, and the candidate's formatting is a reasonable rendering of it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0260815, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0244185, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001663, "wall_seconds": 21.400535900998875, "api_seconds": 19.541419998000492, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45143, "completion_tokens": 809, "reasoning_tokens": 95, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ce0183c497d92fea15bb6df7.json", "detail_js": "details/ce0183c497d92fea15bb6df7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ce0183c497d92fea15bb6df7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6a8de0f60a554b3fa2f3414a5bdc7232.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/51f4066c7f774ac483006fca1d3f1e97.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1748197bbe6736635df1b80b", "question_id": "Q004", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "How many shares of common stock did Amazon.com, Inc. have outstanding as of January 29, 2025 as disclosed on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc. had 10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc. reported **10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding** as of January 29, 2025.\n\nSource: Form 10-K cover page, accession/file_stem **0001018724-25-000004**, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure of 10,597,729,352 shares matches the reference and the tool evidence. The tool output shows the cover-page line 'Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025 | 10597729352' in accession 0001018724-25-000004, which is the 10-K filed 2025-02-07 and is in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet. The candidate's accession and file citation are both supported by the retrieved evidence. The number is stated with correct date and units.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00180843, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00092623, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008822, "wall_seconds": 13.698884347000785, "api_seconds": 12.41044474500086, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 18952, "completion_tokens": 539, "reasoning_tokens": 92, "cache_read_tokens": 5453, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001238", "0001959173-25-001264" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/1748197bbe6736635df1b80b.json", "detail_js": "details/1748197bbe6736635df1b80b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1748197bbe6736635df1b80b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a2fa8eb1ab244851b38cc25fab2471d7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c67f3b723a08446c8676c9a5d2e4813a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a185a003b42bf12605b85417", "question_id": "Q004", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many shares of common stock did Amazon.com, Inc. have outstanding as of January 29, 2025 as disclosed on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc. had 10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc. reported **10,597,729,352 shares of common stock outstanding** as of January 29, 2025.\n\n**Source:** Form 10-K cover page, filing `0001018724-25-000004` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the disclosed figure appears in the passage at character offsets 4826–16826.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure, 10,597,729,352 shares as of January 29, 2025, matches the reference exactly, and the date and units are correct. The read_filing output in the tool evidence contains the cover-page row 'Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 29, 2025 | 10597729352' within the stated character range 4826–16826 of accession 0001018724-25-000004 in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, so the cited source, file, and offsets are supported. The only minor gap is that the tool output does not explicitly label the passage as the cover page beyond its position and content, but the row sits in the cover-page block before the Table of Contents, which supports the claim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00255191, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00134701, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012049, "wall_seconds": 20.511469245000626, "api_seconds": 19.28438040400215, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27087, "completion_tokens": 833, "reasoning_tokens": 286, "cache_read_tokens": 8521, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a185a003b42bf12605b85417.json", "detail_js": "details/a185a003b42bf12605b85417.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a185a003b42bf12605b85417.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f1edea3268ff4fd4b49f64b3215edeb3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c1145d838f764fdf9f0f42b3ab758680.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4fe04ef418cd5b88c473eb91", "question_id": "Q005", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was the number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 as reported on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "As reported on the cover page of NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (Filing Accession No. `0001045810-25-000023`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n> \"The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was **24.4 billion**.\"", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer of 24.4 billion shares as of February 21, 2025 matches the reference. The quoted sentence matches the cover-page text returned by the duckdb_query output word for word. The accession number 0001045810-25-000023 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet both appear in the tool results, and the fiscal year end of January 26, 2025 is shown in the same cover-page extract. No details are unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01819985, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01728075, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009191, "wall_seconds": 20.675338367000222, "api_seconds": 19.16641378299937, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28052, "completion_tokens": 836, "reasoning_tokens": 157, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments" ], "detail_json": "details/4fe04ef418cd5b88c473eb91.json", "detail_js": "details/4fe04ef418cd5b88c473eb91.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4fe04ef418cd5b88c473eb91.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ce3b376fcdcb48d78c7fd068ef890bca.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9c1362eb5cc2404b8cb6859b8f5f5124.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6c5a7987cc2d606eff884b9c", "question_id": "Q005", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was the number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 as reported on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "As reported on the cover page of NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (Filing accession / `file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025:** **24.4 billion**\n\n---\n\n### Source Context\n> *\"The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.\"* \n> — **Form 10-K Cover Page**, NVIDIA Corporation (CIK: `0001045810`).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports 24.4 billion shares outstanding as of February 21, 2025, which matches the reference. The tool output contains the exact cover-page sentence, \"The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion,\" under accession 0001045810-25-000023 in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet. The fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 claim is also supported by the cover text in the same tool output. The candidate's quote and identifiers match the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05321095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.050541749999999996, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026692, "wall_seconds": 31.328287191001436, "api_seconds": 29.526834453001356, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 88251, "completion_tokens": 1166, "reasoning_tokens": 178, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/6c5a7987cc2d606eff884b9c.json", "detail_js": "details/6c5a7987cc2d606eff884b9c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6c5a7987cc2d606eff884b9c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c09b0bc4f1e8421cb00f3ca49845bb5c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b23a32bc99bb41b49308950ad9ba5399.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8e2ab4d6bf1865da1cd163f1", "question_id": "Q005", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was the number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 as reported on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA Corporation reported **24.4 billion shares of common stock outstanding** as of February 21, 2025, on the cover page of its Form 10-K.\n\n**Evidence:** Form 10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. The cover-page text states: “The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.”", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer of 24.4 billion shares outstanding as of February 21, 2025 matches the reference exactly, including the date and units. The tool output from the DuckDB query on accession 0001045810-25-000023 contains the verbatim sentence 'The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.' in the cover-page region, directly supporting the claim. The cited accession and file are consistent with the tool results. No arithmetic or unit issues are present.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001193785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000695385, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0004984, "wall_seconds": 15.558951983999577, "api_seconds": 14.568279866998637, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 12722, "completion_tokens": 557, "reasoning_tokens": 62, "cache_read_tokens": 4841, "excerpt_characters": 700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/8e2ab4d6bf1865da1cd163f1.json", "detail_js": "details/8e2ab4d6bf1865da1cd163f1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8e2ab4d6bf1865da1cd163f1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5c1c1ca0d88142aa95e06777eeeabfa0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/013a360cc71c44e2a2eeb9c82df119a0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ab116275de069e0822affec0", "question_id": "Q005", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was the number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 as reported on the cover page of its Form 10-K?", "reference": "The number of shares of common stock outstanding for NVIDIA Corporation as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA reported **24.4 billion shares of common stock outstanding** as of February 21, 2025.\n\nSource: Form 10-K cover page, filing `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at character offsets 5,281–17,281.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer of 24.4 billion shares as of February 21, 2025 matches the reference in value, date, and units. The read_filing tool output contains the exact sentence \"The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 21, 2025 was 24.4 billion.\" It appears in the cover page section of accession 0001045810-25-000023. The candidate's accession, file (sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet), and character offsets (5,281 to 17,281) match the tool's char_start and char_end values. The citation is fully supported by the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002906625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001521725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013849, "wall_seconds": 21.09577817399986, "api_seconds": 20.044603173000723, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 36418, "completion_tokens": 815, "reasoning_tokens": 205, "cache_read_tokens": 15110, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ab116275de069e0822affec0.json", "detail_js": "details/ab116275de069e0822affec0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ab116275de069e0822affec0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c0586596815342e082ecde1714b904ab.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b73a3ec2fc054a95bd65d320789b7f05.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9432056ff6531142e1c30527", "question_id": "Q006", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is NVIDIA Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is NVIDIA Corporation's auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 2004.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** (San Jose, California; PCAOB ID: 238), as signed on the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*.\n* **Tenure / Since what year they have served:** The tenure statement was not fully retrieved within the available tool budget and retrieved passages; therefore, the specific starting year is not confirmed in the available evidence.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the PCAOB ID (238), and the tool output supports both, along with the San Jose location and the signature on the report. The reference is answerable, and the gold evidence gives 2004 as the start year. The candidate omits the tenure year and says it could not be confirmed. That abstention is honest and the candidate does not invent a year, but the question has two parts and only the first is answered, so correctness is partial. The retrieved passages end at the signature block and do not include the tenure sentence, so the 'not confirmed' claim is consistent with the tool evidence. Citation support is high because every factual claim the candidate makes is backed by the retrieved text, though the file-stem and file-ID references are only partly tied to the query output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0369182, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0355875, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013307, "wall_seconds": 33.383166064999386, "api_seconds": 30.578524676000598, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 53172, "completion_tokens": 1517, "reasoning_tokens": 364, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 14000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9432056ff6531142e1c30527.json", "detail_js": "details/9432056ff6531142e1c30527.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9432056ff6531142e1c30527.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1f9d4cda808e4da192e07d3c2165adfe.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/22d887c6410846c1a983ce352afcf20d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "44189afddf36018a322aaa2f", "question_id": "Q006", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is NVIDIA Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is NVIDIA Corporation's auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 2004.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (Filing stem: `0001045810-25-000023`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** (San Jose, California; PCAOB ID: 238)\n* **Auditor Serving Since:** **2004**\n\n*(Source: Part IV, Item 15, \"Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm\", characters ~265640–266000: \"/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004.\")*", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and 2004 as the start year, matching the reference and the gold quote 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004.' The tool output directly supports both facts, along with the San Jose location, PCAOB ID 238, the filing accession and file ID, and the January 26, 2025 fiscal year end. The character range (~265640–266000) is approximately consistent with the returned text, which places the auditor-tenure sentence shortly after the PwC signature block. Minor deduction only because the 'Part IV, Item 15' label and the exact character offset are inferred from the chunk rather than explicitly stated in the evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0263134, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0244365, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018769, "wall_seconds": 21.70853851300126, "api_seconds": 20.577256039996428, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 46111, "completion_tokens": 1048, "reasoning_tokens": 326, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/44189afddf36018a322aaa2f.json", "detail_js": "details/44189afddf36018a322aaa2f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/44189afddf36018a322aaa2f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/51b1478b8668454d96bf99c8afdb02c4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/534c9c96951948abb52ef61c4791a975.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4dc5c08f1bd5dd8cdc6ac639", "question_id": "Q006", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is NVIDIA Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is NVIDIA Corporation's auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 2004.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)**. The company’s FY2025 Form 10-K says PwC has served as its auditor **since 2004**.\n\n**Evidence:** NVIDIA Form 10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the auditor’s report states “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004” (SQL passage beginning at character offset 265,500). The filing identifies NVIDIA Corporation and PwC in the auditor’s report.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as NVIDIA's auditor and states service since 2004, matching the reference. The quoted sentence 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004' and the accession 0001045810-25-000023 appear in the tool output (the SQL passage at offset 265500 of the 10-K file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet). The candidate's description of the filing as FY2025 10-K is supported by the header (period 20250126, form 10-K). Minor issue: the candidate says the auditor's report 'identifies NVIDIA Corporation and PwC', which is only loosely supported by the shown passage (it shows the signature '/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP' and the company's auditor sentence), and the 'SQL passage beginning at character offset 265,500' is accurate to the query. Slight deduction for minor overreach in the evidence wording.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0027507, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0016164999999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011342, "wall_seconds": 34.59613280300073, "api_seconds": 32.62017168900093, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 43521, "completion_tokens": 1196, "reasoning_tokens": 114, "cache_read_tokens": 26335, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000033", "0001045810-25-000034", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000039", "0001045810-25-000065", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000074", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000097", "0001045810-25-000102", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001045810-25-000120", "0001045810-25-000123", "0001045810-25-000124", "0001045810-25-000127", "0001045810-25-000128", "0001045810-25-000130", "0001214659-25-008150", "0001225208-25-005831", "0001921094-25-000574", "0001921094-25-000709", "0001950047-25-004520", "0001958244-25-003698", "0001961863-25-000072", "0001965301-25-000076", "0001973251-25-000041" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4dc5c08f1bd5dd8cdc6ac639.json", "detail_js": "details/4dc5c08f1bd5dd8cdc6ac639.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4dc5c08f1bd5dd8cdc6ac639.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/24ab1cc8bb524610b3551bcc7fc9413e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2faa10839e36463b8e0c188a3d9182e5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1387273f94f0674566cf275c", "question_id": "Q006", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is NVIDIA Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is NVIDIA Corporation's auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 2004.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to identify NVIDIA Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm or the year it began serving. The only filing text read was for `0001045810-25-000013`, and it did not contain the searched company name; attempts to read other candidate filings did not return usable content.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, auditor since 2004, per accession 0001045810-25-000023. The candidate abstains and gives neither the firm nor the year, so it misses both required facts. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, and this one is answerable, so the score is very low. The candidate does not state any false facts. Its account of the tool evidence is accurate: the read of 0001045810-25-000013 returned found=false for 'NVIDIA Corporation', the read of -000014 returned a duplicate-accession error, the reads of -000021 and -000023 hit 'Tool budget exhausted', and the search returned no rows. The candidate never read the filing containing the gold quote, which is the reason it failed, but that does not make its stated evidence unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003410645, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002238245, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011724, "wall_seconds": 33.375723604000086, "api_seconds": 31.96630837900011, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 10, "tool_processed": 10, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 2, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46779, "completion_tokens": 1671, "reasoning_tokens": 640, "cache_read_tokens": 26562, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000033", "0001045810-25-000034", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000039", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000048", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000050", "0001045810-25-000051", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000065", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000097", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001045810-25-000120", "0001045810-25-000123", "0001045810-25-000124", "0001045810-25-000127", "0001045810-25-000128", "0001045810-25-000130", "0001214659-25-008150", "0001225208-25-005831", "0001921094-25-000574", "0001921094-25-000576", "0001921094-25-000709", "0001950047-25-004520", "0001958244-25-003698", "0001961863-25-000072", "0001965301-25-000076", "0001973251-25-000041" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1387273f94f0674566cf275c.json", "detail_js": "details/1387273f94f0674566cf275c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1387273f94f0674566cf275c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/528699db04ad4a6891a749a2dc0dc03e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/13e2b5276fed41f1bbee5456bfdcbf21.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c49c4376204d97256c8db455", "question_id": "Q007", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "How many shares of common stock were outstanding for Intel Corporation as of January 24, 2025 as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "As of January 24, 2025, 4,330 million shares of Intel common stock were outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (filed with the SEC on January 31, 2025; filing ID / file stem: `0000050863-25-000009`, in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **4,330 million shares** (or **4,330,000,000 shares**) of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025.\n\n---\n\n### Excerpt from the Cover Page:\n> *\"The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2024, based upon the closing price of the common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market on such date, was $132.4 billion. **4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025**.\"*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives 4,330 million shares outstanding as of January 24, 2025, matching the reference. The cover-page text in the tool output contains the exact sentence, so the answer and the quoted excerpt are supported. The filing date (January 31, 2025), accession number, and source file are also supported by the header in the tool output. The unit conversion to 4,330,000,000 is arithmetically correct. The only minor issue is that the first tool query errored and the candidate's stated sourcing relies on later successful calls, which does not affect correctness.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01936605, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01829775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010683, "wall_seconds": 23.345954758000516, "api_seconds": 22.365525014000013, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28630, "completion_tokens": 1290, "reasoning_tokens": 277, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000074" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/c49c4376204d97256c8db455.json", "detail_js": "details/c49c4376204d97256c8db455.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c49c4376204d97256c8db455.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/995de22332b244f4a5c5af82e3a40216.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c8397e181cd548bab108b56c9bcfcd79.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5c7eefd120b294ee3dc04328", "question_id": "Q007", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many shares of common stock were outstanding for Intel Corporation as of January 24, 2025 as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "As of January 24, 2025, 4,330 million shares of Intel common stock were outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (filed on January 31, 2025; file stem `0000050863-25-000009` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n> **\"4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025.\"** (or **4,330,000,000** shares).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the reference: 4,330 million shares outstanding as of January 24, 2025. The quoted sentence appears verbatim in the read_filing output from accession 0000050863-25-000009, and the 4,330,000,000 conversion is arithmetically correct. The filing date of January 31, 2025 is supported by the 'FILED AS OF DATE: 20250131' field in the same output, and the file stem and parquet filename match the tool results. The only minor gap is that the candidate cites the filename rather than the section label, and the read_filing output was a truncated first chunk, though it contains the cover page in full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.020290700000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0188925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013982, "wall_seconds": 21.904362451999987, "api_seconds": 21.27021582999987, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33667, "completion_tokens": 1101, "reasoning_tokens": 396, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/5c7eefd120b294ee3dc04328.json", "detail_js": "details/5c7eefd120b294ee3dc04328.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5c7eefd120b294ee3dc04328.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5e75b658d5a24ca4af32815be431e336.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0a0e10d2c8064c7bb1a5c010c9cae9fb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b7b4a4775621dc82a2c8ec2e", "question_id": "Q007", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "How many shares of common stock were outstanding for Intel Corporation as of January 24, 2025 as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "As of January 24, 2025, 4,330 million shares of Intel common stock were outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel Corporation reported **4,330 million shares** of common stock outstanding as of January 24, 2025—that is, **4.330 billion shares**.\n\nSource: 2024 Form 10-K cover page, filing `0000050863-25-000009`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the cover-page text appears at character offset 6,140.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports 4,330 million shares outstanding as of January 24, 2025, which matches the reference and the gold quote. The 4.330 billion conversion is correct. The cited accession 0000050863-25-000009 and file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet both appear in the tool outputs. The offset of 6,140 is the strpos result from the DuckDB query, and the excerpt returned by that query contains the sentence '4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025.' Minor deduction: strpos is 1-based, so the value is a position rather than a strict 0-based offset, and the candidate does not quote the sentence directly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00204639, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00105549, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009909, "wall_seconds": 22.531372093000755, "api_seconds": 21.857935713000188, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 24089, "completion_tokens": 847, "reasoning_tokens": 200, "cache_read_tokens": 10249, "excerpt_characters": 6300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/b7b4a4775621dc82a2c8ec2e.json", "detail_js": "details/b7b4a4775621dc82a2c8ec2e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b7b4a4775621dc82a2c8ec2e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/69e87c50285244b88b28a71058db4ae4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f188966427b54576866ea733ee79a096.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1de82060cdcaec701d035a4d", "question_id": "Q007", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "numerical", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many shares of common stock were outstanding for Intel Corporation as of January 24, 2025 as stated on the cover page of its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "As of January 24, 2025, 4,330 million shares of Intel common stock were outstanding.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel reported **4,330 million shares** of common stock outstanding—**4.330 billion shares**—as of January 24, 2025.\n\n**Source:** Intel Corporation 2024 Form 10-K, cover page, file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the passage states “4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025.”", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer of 4,330 million shares outstanding as of January 24, 2025 matches the reference, and the 4.330 billion conversion is correct. The tool output from read_filing contains the exact sentence quoted, '4,330 million shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 24, 2025,' within the cover page text of accession 0000050863-25-000009 in sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet. The candidate's cited accession, file, and section are consistent with the tool evidence. The answer is complete and needs no abstention.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0022228549999999997, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001148755, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010741, "wall_seconds": 17.002328036000108, "api_seconds": 16.441111128999182, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 22010, "completion_tokens": 695, "reasoning_tokens": 218, "cache_read_tokens": 5488, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/1de82060cdcaec701d035a4d.json", "detail_js": "details/1de82060cdcaec701d035a4d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1de82060cdcaec701d035a4d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8afc205669784776b9b0573315cb440f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/22257f40707a4bf3aeb3059181c6da59.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a12b21514ea9b0d2b7dda403", "question_id": "Q008", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as Intel Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Intel Corporation's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1968.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024 (filing accession/`file_stem`: `0000050863-25-000009`, in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP**\n* **Year since which they have served as auditor:** **1968**\n\n### Reference from the Filing:\nFrom the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* (Opinion on the Financial Statements):\n> \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968. \n> San Jose, California \n> January 31, 2025\"", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1968, matching the reference. The tool output supports both: the snippet at offset ~328000 shows '/s/ Ernst & Young LLP' and 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968.' The accession 0000050863-25-000009, the fiscal year end of December 28, 2024, the San Jose signature and the January 31, 2025 date all appear in the retrieved text. The quoted block is slightly reformatted but faithful. No arithmetic or unit issues apply.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02477785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02386725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009106, "wall_seconds": 26.6165704440009, "api_seconds": 25.183415247001903, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 34664, "completion_tokens": 1253, "reasoning_tokens": 233, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a12b21514ea9b0d2b7dda403.json", "detail_js": "details/a12b21514ea9b0d2b7dda403.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a12b21514ea9b0d2b7dda403.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c426dd78649a40a49d273b38c5d5c249.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0cc70d2c51be46ee8e6fb572e701ecc2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2000b87599213fb1c8cf2b6b", "question_id": "Q008", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as Intel Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Intel Corporation's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1968.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Filing ID / File Stem: `0000050863-25-000009`, character offset ~329,000, page 55):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP**\n* **Year Served Since:** **1968** (\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968.\")", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1968, matching the reference and the gold quote. The read_filing output supports both facts: '/s/ Ernst & Young LLP' and 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968.' It also supports the December 28, 2024 fiscal year-end and the character offset (~329,000). The page 55 citation is plausible because the quote precedes the 'Auditor's Reports | 55' footer. The 'Form 10-K' label is inferred from the Form 10-K Cross-Reference Index in the same document rather than stated outright, which keeps citation support slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02168695, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.020469750000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012172, "wall_seconds": 24.161403656000402, "api_seconds": 23.06898605800052, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 34540, "completion_tokens": 985, "reasoning_tokens": 278, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000063", "0000050863-25-000070", "0000050863-25-000074", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/2000b87599213fb1c8cf2b6b.json", "detail_js": "details/2000b87599213fb1c8cf2b6b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2000b87599213fb1c8cf2b6b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a1c5fccb895047ae9f3be61121246954.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6957b10339544bcca49a13607d3dffa8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ff0c7b33c86f8c5773f3ff94", "question_id": "Q008", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as Intel Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Intel Corporation's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1968.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP**. The firm states that it has served as Intel’s auditor **since 1968**.\n\n**Source:** Intel’s 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0000050863-25-000052`, in `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`. The auditor’s report identifies Ernst & Young LLP and states, “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1968.”", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 94, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1968, matching the reference. The quoted sentence, \"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1968,\" appears verbatim in the tool output for accession 0000050863-25-000052 in sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet, and the excerpt shows the Ernst & Young LLP signature beside it. The candidate's accession differs from the gold evidence accession (0000050863-25-000009), but the tool evidence supports the candidate's cited filing, so I scored citation support on the tool evidence. The small deduction reflects that accession mismatch with the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003503555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001930855, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015727, "wall_seconds": 33.27304811799877, "api_seconds": 31.382605007996972, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 53846, "completion_tokens": 1563, "reasoning_tokens": 507, "cache_read_tokens": 31978, "excerpt_characters": 13000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000063", "0000050863-25-000070", "0000050863-25-000074", "0000050863-25-000084", "0000050863-25-000087", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094", "0001127602-25-013177", "0001127602-25-013180", "0001127602-25-013720", "0001127602-25-013723", "0001127602-25-013732", "0001127602-25-013734", "0001127602-25-013735", "0001127602-25-013738", "0001127602-25-013739", "0001127602-25-013740", "0001127602-25-013741", "0001127602-25-013742", "0001127602-25-016494", "0001127602-25-016503", "0001127602-25-016513", "0001127602-25-016515" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ff0c7b33c86f8c5773f3ff94.json", "detail_js": "details/ff0c7b33c86f8c5773f3ff94.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ff0c7b33c86f8c5773f3ff94.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fdfe36180cc24198a9d3cdba859edf08.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8dccdd0184244d2c996266760e016841.request.json" }, { "task_id": "20695eea25de0c4c63c5c975", "question_id": "Q008", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as Intel Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Intel Corporation's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1968.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence identifies **Crowe LLP** as auditor **of the Intel 401(k) Savings Plan since 2022** (filing `0000050863-25-000094`, `sfd-v1-2025-06.parquet`, excerpt offsets 1271–13271). It does not establish that Crowe is Intel Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm, or when the company’s auditor began serving. So I can’t determine the requested company-level answer from the available evidence.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answers that Ernst & Young LLP has audited Intel Corporation since 1968, so the question is answerable. The candidate abstains and does not give the company-level auditor or start year, so it misses the core answer. Its abstention is not a wrong answer, and it correctly avoids conflating Crowe LLP (auditor of the Intel 401(k) Savings Plan since 2022) with Intel Corporation's auditor. The cited details (Crowe LLP, plan auditor since 2022, accession 0000050863-25-000094, offsets 1271–13271) match the tool output. The gold accession 0000050863-25-000009 never appears in the tool evidence, so the candidate could not have found the reference passage with its searches.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00409901, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00260621, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014928, "wall_seconds": 28.87395016299888, "api_seconds": 27.13159072000417, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 50547, "completion_tokens": 1438, "reasoning_tokens": 423, "cache_read_tokens": 22866, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000084", "0000050863-25-000087", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094", "0001127602-25-013177", "0001127602-25-013180", "0001127602-25-013720", "0001127602-25-013723", "0001127602-25-013732", "0001127602-25-013734", "0001127602-25-013735", "0001127602-25-013738", "0001127602-25-013739", "0001127602-25-013740", "0001127602-25-013741", "0001127602-25-013742", "0001127602-25-016494", "0001127602-25-016503", "0001127602-25-016513", "0001127602-25-016515" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/20695eea25de0c4c63c5c975.json", "detail_js": "details/20695eea25de0c4c63c5c975.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/20695eea25de0c4c63c5c975.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ce3bd6eaed6c460dbb50bace608f45a4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0c13fec30df148cfaa979c52ab8cd96b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "275f7e49cbc484a5ca796712", "question_id": "Q009", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is Adobe Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Adobe Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1983.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (Accession Number / file stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **KPMG LLP**\n* **Year They Have Served Since:** **1983**\n\nFrom the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*:\n> \"/s/ KPMG LLP \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983. \n> Santa Clara, California \n> January 13, 2025\"", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names KPMG LLP and 1983, matching the reference. Tool output supports both: the auditor text reads '/s/ KPMG LLP' and 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983.' The accession 0000796343-25-000004, the period of report 20241129 (fiscal year ended November 29, 2024), and the file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet are all in the tool results. The candidate's block quote adds the Santa Clara and January 13, 2025 lines, which also appear in the retrieved text. The only minor gap is that the fiscal year-end date is taken from the header metadata rather than the audit report itself, which does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.032029, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0309285, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011005, "wall_seconds": 26.621821024999008, "api_seconds": 25.29427846800354, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45348, "completion_tokens": 1379, "reasoning_tokens": 231, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019450", "0001628280-25-019451", "0001628280-25-019452", "0001628280-25-019454", "0001628280-25-019455", "0001628280-25-020297", "0001628280-25-020298", "0001628280-25-020302", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-020324", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000339", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/275f7e49cbc484a5ca796712.json", "detail_js": "details/275f7e49cbc484a5ca796712.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/275f7e49cbc484a5ca796712.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7ef202042a3f4a0cab3371ac8ffc98f6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7e7787f7c07c43f7aa753627e9cdd8a5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "71952ba9d82d356bd16807bc", "question_id": "Q009", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is Adobe Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Adobe Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1983.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (Filing ID: `0000796343-25-000004`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **KPMG LLP** (located in Santa Clara, California; PCAOB ID: 185)\n* **Serving Since:** **1983**\n\n---\n\n### Source & Evidence\nFrom the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* in Item 8 (*Financial Statements and Supplementary Data*):\n> \"/s/ KPMG LLP \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983. \n> Santa Clara, California \n> January 13, 2025\" \n*(Offsets ~398,000–398,500 in filing `0000796343-25-000004`)*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names KPMG LLP and 1983, matching the reference and the gold quote. The tool output contains the exact sentence \"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983.\" followed by \"/s/ KPMG LLP\" and \"Santa Clara, California / January 13, 2025.\" The fiscal year end (November 29, 2024), accession, and file ID are all shown in the Form 10-K cover text and the DuckDB results. PCAOB ID 185 and the Santa Clara location appear in the Item 8 index. The candidate's offset range (~398,000–398,500) is approximate: the tool returned a window starting at 397,672, so the quote's exact position was not pinned down. That is a minor precision issue in the citation, not an error in the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05222355, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04949175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0027318, "wall_seconds": 29.652331354000125, "api_seconds": 27.462617308003246, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 87247, "completion_tokens": 1212, "reasoning_tokens": 288, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/71952ba9d82d356bd16807bc.json", "detail_js": "details/71952ba9d82d356bd16807bc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/71952ba9d82d356bd16807bc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/30b914c4a1ec46f4a9253867f51eaa7d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6707cadf99dd42e1a02e9113e64e8e1f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "43e63b1a762126b148217675", "question_id": "Q009", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is Adobe Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Adobe Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1983.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm is **KPMG LLP**. KPMG says it has served as Adobe’s auditor since **1983**.\n\n**Source:** Adobe’s 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0000796343-25-000004` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the auditor report identifies KPMG LLP, and the report states, “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1983.”", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names KPMG LLP and 1983, matching the reference and the gold quote. The tool output supports both: the auditor signature block reads '/s/ KPMG LLP' followed by 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983,' and the filing is accession 0000796343-25-000004 in sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet. The label '2024 Form 10-K' is a reasonable inference from the November 29, 2024 fiscal year-end, not an explicit quote, so citation support is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002532205, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001388305, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011439, "wall_seconds": 23.86026150900034, "api_seconds": 22.46222301800117, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32146, "completion_tokens": 1156, "reasoning_tokens": 394, "cache_read_tokens": 15848, "excerpt_characters": 6800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/43e63b1a762126b148217675.json", "detail_js": "details/43e63b1a762126b148217675.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/43e63b1a762126b148217675.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e190f07d4ba94c9da361222021d2a542.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d968a1a08f644b9dabf1badada81908d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d4e74addd955e2d8864e5506", "question_id": "Q009", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is Adobe Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Adobe Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1983.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t verify the answer from the available filing evidence. The metadata lookup located Adobe CIK 796343 filings, but attempts to read the candidate filings failed because the filing accessions were reported as duplicates. Without a readable filing passage, I can’t substantiate the accounting firm or the year it began serving.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answers that KPMG LLP has audited Adobe since 1983, supported by a gold quote from accession 0000796343-25-000004. The candidate abstains, saying it cannot verify the firm or year. The reference is answerable, so abstention does not earn full correctness, and the candidate provides no substantive answer, so correctness is 0. Citation support is scored on the tool evidence alone: the tool outputs show only metadata listings and repeated 'Duplicate filing' errors, with no passage naming KPMG or 1983. The candidate's statement that reads failed and that the firm and year could not be substantiated accurately reflects that evidence, so it is fully supported, earning 100.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0019046, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0012573, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0006473, "wall_seconds": 65.21762168500027, "api_seconds": 64.29289529500056, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31093, "completion_tokens": 1088, "reasoning_tokens": 315, "cache_read_tokens": 20645, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-018279", "0001628280-25-018280", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019450", "0001628280-25-019452", "0001628280-25-019457", "0001628280-25-020297", "0001628280-25-020298", "0001628280-25-020302", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-020324", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000339", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/d4e74addd955e2d8864e5506.json", "detail_js": "details/d4e74addd955e2d8864e5506.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d4e74addd955e2d8864e5506.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b20eada839a1477095cff8df1a4aa9cf.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/71042682fcca491abfeda59bbc099ca8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5412e491957d1e3fae79b115", "question_id": "Q010", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What is the state of incorporation and IRS Employer Identification Number of Adobe Inc. as reported in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. is incorporated in Delaware (DE) and its IRS Employer Identification Number is 77-0019522 (770019522).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0000796343-25-000004`, file: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **State of Incorporation:** **Delaware**\n* **IRS Employer Identification Number:** **77-0019522**", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly reports Delaware as the state of incorporation and 77-0019522 as the IRS EIN, matching the reference (the reference's 770019522 is the same number without the hyphen). The tool output supports these facts directly: the SGML header lists 'IRS NUMBER: 770019522' and 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE', and the cover page shows 'Delaware' and '77-0019522'. The fiscal year end of November 29, 2024, the accession 0000796343-25-000004, and the file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet are also all in the tool output. The gold evidence quotes only the header fields, so the cover-page confirmation adds support beyond it. Citation support is not a perfect 100 only because the gold quote does not include the EIN with its hyphen, and the candidate's formatting of the EIN is slightly different from the header's unhyphenated form.", "known_cost_usd": 0.01249765, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01155225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009454, "wall_seconds": 14.128968042999986, "api_seconds": 13.6432725379982, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 20797, "completion_tokens": 812, "reasoning_tokens": 218, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/5412e491957d1e3fae79b115.json", "detail_js": "details/5412e491957d1e3fae79b115.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5412e491957d1e3fae79b115.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1d5f553f1fb34cddbf783f99ab550742.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/95f977ffd9f144d1958d59f5471a9db9.request.json" }, { "task_id": "74aac97f40b551d3e37cb3ae", "question_id": "Q010", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is the state of incorporation and IRS Employer Identification Number of Adobe Inc. as reported in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. is incorporated in Delaware (DE) and its IRS Employer Identification Number is 77-0019522 (770019522).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the cover page of Adobe Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024; file stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **State of Incorporation:** Delaware\n* **IRS Employer Identification Number:** 77-0019522 (or 770019522)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states Delaware as the state of incorporation and 77-0019522 (or 770019522) as the IRS EIN, matching the reference. The fiscal year end of November 29, 2024 and the accession/file identifiers are supported by the tool output. The tool evidence includes both the COMPANY DATA block (IRS NUMBER 770019522, STATE OF INCORPORATION DE) and the cover page table (Delaware, 77-0019522), so the citation to the cover page is accurate. The failed first DuckDB query did not affect the final answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0169581, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0156885, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012696, "wall_seconds": 17.037584220999634, "api_seconds": 16.446780320997277, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 29644, "completion_tokens": 794, "reasoning_tokens": 252, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/74aac97f40b551d3e37cb3ae.json", "detail_js": "details/74aac97f40b551d3e37cb3ae.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/74aac97f40b551d3e37cb3ae.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/695845668137480991bb7561094d6e65.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8b3119dcc94a4c20b510501cf17c537f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "65b63292a4a7282bc528dc68", "question_id": "Q010", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What is the state of incorporation and IRS Employer Identification Number of Adobe Inc. as reported in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. is incorporated in Delaware (DE) and its IRS Employer Identification Number is 77-0019522 (770019522).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K reports its state of incorporation as **Delaware (DE)** and its IRS Employer Identification Number as **77-0019522**.\n\nEvidence: the filing header identifies the company as ADOBE INC., lists “STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE” and “IRS NUMBER: 770019522,” and identifies the filing as a 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024. Source: file_stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` (header excerpt returned by the scoped SQL query).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives Delaware (DE) as the state of incorporation and 77-0019522 as the IRS EIN, matching the reference. The tool output (the scoped DuckDB header excerpt for accession 0000796343-25-000004) shows 'IRS NUMBER: 770019522' and 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE', so both facts are supported. The EIN is shown in the hyphenated form the reference also uses, and the fiscal year end of November 29, 2024 matches the header. The only minor gap is that the candidate's citation describes the file as a header excerpt without quoting the exact lines, but the claims are accurate against the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00220085, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00124145, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009594, "wall_seconds": 58.15930139000011, "api_seconds": 56.976242564998756, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 24725, "completion_tokens": 1317, "reasoning_tokens": 415, "cache_read_tokens": 11780, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/65b63292a4a7282bc528dc68.json", "detail_js": "details/65b63292a4a7282bc528dc68.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/65b63292a4a7282bc528dc68.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dfa79d7c7f5a4f549075074b06062f9b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0c01661b0bfe45e69dd3a0af70cd2329.request.json" }, { "task_id": "74c1bfb8dee7f8799aeeacc3", "question_id": "Q010", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is the state of incorporation and IRS Employer Identification Number of Adobe Inc. as reported in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. is incorporated in Delaware (DE) and its IRS Employer Identification Number is 77-0019522 (770019522).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to determine Adobe Inc.’s state of incorporation or IRS Employer Identification Number. No matching filing was identified in the metadata lookup, and the partial issuer searches returned no results.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer states Adobe is incorporated in Delaware with EIN 77-0019522 (gold evidence: 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE' from accession 0000796343-25-000004). The candidate abstains, claiming insufficient evidence. The reference is answerable, so abstention is not correct; the candidate also misses the state of incorporation, which is clearly in the gold evidence. Its citation support is high because its claims accurately reflect the tool outputs: the queries returned no rows for accession 796343 in 2024 and the company-filtered searches returned empty results, though those searches only scanned the first 500 rows of each file and were incomplete (complete: false), so the candidate's statement that no matching filing exists overstates what was checked. Citation support is therefore high but not perfect.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00179593, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00116793, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.000628, "wall_seconds": 48.12011557999904, "api_seconds": 46.029668953999135, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 14069, "completion_tokens": 884, "reasoning_tokens": 104, "cache_read_tokens": 2283, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/74c1bfb8dee7f8799aeeacc3.json", "detail_js": "details/74c1bfb8dee7f8799aeeacc3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/74c1bfb8dee7f8799aeeacc3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dd832fd0e0674a87ac6cd52aa3c22b99.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/88faf109ae0d49349ea520dad2ccb5dd.request.json" }, { "task_id": "19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd", "question_id": "Q011", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for Levi Strauss & Co., and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent auditor for Levi Strauss & Co., serving as auditor since 2007.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Levi Strauss & Co.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 1, 2024 (Accession Number / file stem: `0000094845-25-000005`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** (San Francisco, California)\n* **Serving since:** **2007** (as stated in their Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: *\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.\"*).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm and 2007 as the year it began serving as auditor, matching the reference and gold evidence. The tool output (snippet containing '/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, San Francisco, California, January 29, 2025' and 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007') directly supports both facts, the accession number 0000094845-25-000005, and the San Francisco location. The fiscal year end of December 1, 2024 is supported by the header metadata. The failed first query does not affect the correctness of the final answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0206009, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.019836, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007649, "wall_seconds": 58.36327265100044, "api_seconds": 55.70784156699847, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 29917, "completion_tokens": 836, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000010", "0000094845-25-000019", "0000784977-25-000012", "0000784977-25-000053", "0000784977-25-000055", "0000784977-25-000062", "0000784977-25-000074", "0001308179-25-000101" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "unknown_api_cost" ], "detail_json": "details/19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd.json", "detail_js": "details/19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/19121a41f3331f7d46ef7dfd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e7198f19ed734bfbbcbc5de9ed0b2fa9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7c8060a1e137458d9219017a99dda7e6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "766e81a6b3f292017bb295a2", "question_id": "Q011", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for Levi Strauss & Co., and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent auditor for Levi Strauss & Co., serving as auditor since 2007.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Levi Strauss & Co.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 1, 2024 (Filing ID: `0000094845-25-000005`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Item 8, *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** (San Francisco, California)\n* **Serving as Auditor Since:** **2007**\n\n*(Reference: \"/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.\")*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the year 2007, matching the reference and the gold quote. The read_filing output in the tool evidence contains the PwC signature block (San Francisco, California, January 29, 2025) and the line \"We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.\" The accession 0000094845-25-000005 and the December 1, 2024 fiscal year end are also supported by the balance sheet date in the retrieved text. The one small gap is that the tool evidence never states the form type as \"Form 10-K\" explicitly, so that label is inferred, which keeps citation_support just below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02285285, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02169525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011576, "wall_seconds": 25.906880084001386, "api_seconds": 24.98252597999999, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35168, "completion_tokens": 1067, "reasoning_tokens": 230, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000010", "0000094845-25-000019", "0001308179-25-000101" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/766e81a6b3f292017bb295a2.json", "detail_js": "details/766e81a6b3f292017bb295a2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/766e81a6b3f292017bb295a2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/69d95e3f29e846fc9a2b061ac7a300f7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/46437b3754fb429b8454db7beacc3b2f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "166977ec3432be6c4053ddc3", "question_id": "Q011", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for Levi Strauss & Co., and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent auditor for Levi Strauss & Co., serving as auditor since 2007.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP serves as Levi Strauss & Co.’s independent registered public accounting firm. The company’s auditor’s report states, “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.” (2025 Form 10-K, file_stem **0000094845-25-000005**, file_id **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**; SQL excerpt around character offset **384450**.)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the year 2007, matching the reference and the gold quote. The tool output supports both: the query at offset 384450 of accession 0000094845-25-000005 shows '/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.' The file_id and offset cited also match the tool calls. The citation support loses a few points because the tool output never states the form type, so the label '2025 Form 10-K' is inferred from the fiscal-year audit report rather than shown directly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00481514, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00319794, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016172, "wall_seconds": 38.29527956400125, "api_seconds": 35.54727527400246, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 66507, "completion_tokens": 1492, "reasoning_tokens": 477, "cache_read_tokens": 33784, "excerpt_characters": 13850, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000006", "0000094845-25-000010", "0000094845-25-000029", "0000315066-25-000776", "0000935836-25-000087", "0000935836-25-000099", "0000935836-25-000108", "0000935836-25-000109", "0000935836-25-000110", "0000935836-25-000174", "0000950170-25-019991", "0000950170-25-021720", "0001308179-25-000101", "0001493152-25-004904", "0001641172-25-008652", "0001641172-25-014339", "0001641172-25-014341", "0001839882-25-003260", "0001839882-25-007016", "0001839882-25-008405", "0001839882-25-013579", "0001959173-25-000614", "0001959173-25-001554", "0001959173-25-003354", "0001999371-25-005354", "0001999371-25-005895", "0001999371-25-005897", "0001999371-25-005898", "0001999371-25-005899", "0001999371-25-005901", "0001999371-25-005903", "0001999371-25-005904", "0001999371-25-005905", "0001999371-25-005906", "0001999371-25-005908", "0001999371-25-005909", "0001999371-25-006407", "0001999371-25-006532", "0001999371-25-007160" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/166977ec3432be6c4053ddc3.json", "detail_js": "details/166977ec3432be6c4053ddc3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/166977ec3432be6c4053ddc3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/76e56580437d453d8f7650fff1850559.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b2b391dd1d524f0589065cc80945805d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fffa914d683f4734766476a9", "question_id": "Q011", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for Levi Strauss & Co., and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent auditor for Levi Strauss & Co., serving as auditor since 2007.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence verifies Levi Strauss & Co.’s identity in its 2025 filing, but it does not identify the independent registered public accounting firm or establish when that firm began serving. I can’t answer those parts from the evidence available.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (accession 0000094845-25-000005, Item 8) states PwC's tenure since 2007. The candidate abstained, so it omits both the firm and the year, which is a major completeness failure. It did not state anything false, which keeps the score above zero. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, and this one was not. The candidate's tool evidence supports its narrow claims: the 8-K it read identifies Levi Strauss & Co., and the Deloitte and 'Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm' searches on that filing returned nothing. However, the candidate never opened the accession 0000094845-25-000005 that appeared in its own search results, so the abstention rests on an incomplete search rather than on the corpus lacking the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00335585, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00214115, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012147, "wall_seconds": 30.923044347999166, "api_seconds": 29.078275114999997, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 43014, "completion_tokens": 1361, "reasoning_tokens": 364, "cache_read_tokens": 21375, "excerpt_characters": 1600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000006", "0000315066-25-000776", "0000935836-25-000087", "0000935836-25-000099", "0000935836-25-000109", "0000935836-25-000110", "0000935836-25-000174", "0000950170-25-005868", "0000950170-25-019991", "0000950170-25-021720", "0001493152-25-004902", "0001493152-25-004904", "0001839882-25-001335", "0001839882-25-003260", "0001839882-25-003261", "0001839882-25-003302", "0001839882-25-003303", "0001839882-25-003304", "0001839882-25-003305", "0001839882-25-006891", "0001839882-25-006898", "0001839882-25-006900", "0001839882-25-006906", "0001839882-25-006909", "0001839882-25-006914", "0001839882-25-006919", "0001839882-25-007016", "0001839882-25-007030", "0001839882-25-008405", "0001959173-25-000126", "0001959173-25-000614", "0001999371-25-000183", "0001999371-25-000800", "0001999371-25-000802", "0001999371-25-000804", "0001999371-25-000806", "0001999371-25-000808", "0001999371-25-000810" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fffa914d683f4734766476a9.json", "detail_js": "details/fffa914d683f4734766476a9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fffa914d683f4734766476a9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a10e1216d21a43bfa1c31595b9de3d8a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7ba79ce69c7d48cb82fc9ab56ed1d43a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dd182a84024299bb5cdf8d45", "question_id": "Q012", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In what state is Comcast Corporation incorporated, and who is its independent auditor and auditor tenure?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in Pennsylvania, and its independent auditor is Deloitte & Touche LLP, which has served as auditor since 1963.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / Filing ID: `0001166691-25-000011`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n1. **State of Incorporation:** \n * **Pennsylvania** (disclosed on the Form 10-K cover page).\n\n2. **Independent Auditor:** \n * **Deloitte & Touche LLP** (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).\n\n3. **Auditor Tenure:** \n * Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as the company's auditor since **1963** (disclosed following their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements: *\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1963\"*).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all three points: Pennsylvania as the state of incorporation, Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditor, and auditor tenure since 1963. Tool evidence supports each claim: the SGML header shows 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: PA' and the cover page shows 'Pennsylvania'; the signature block shows '/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania'; and the tenure quote 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1963' appears verbatim. The fiscal year end (December 31, 2024), accession number, and file ID are also supported by the tool outputs. The candidate's claim that the state is on the cover page is accurate. The one small gap is that the Philadelphia location is drawn from the signature block rather than a named auditor-office disclosure, which is a minor detail and does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0295439, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.028326, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012179, "wall_seconds": 30.308629324999856, "api_seconds": 27.424651740997433, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 43202, "completion_tokens": 1349, "reasoning_tokens": 281, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001096906-25-000908", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000018", "0001166691-25-000021", "0001166691-25-000027", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001193125-25-115996", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/dd182a84024299bb5cdf8d45.json", "detail_js": "details/dd182a84024299bb5cdf8d45.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dd182a84024299bb5cdf8d45.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/af3c641f5ce648dcb92bbbb4fafdc025.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c029b4e025ec46a892c19db774475454.request.json" }, { "task_id": "81e523951475d477976010e0", "question_id": "Q012", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In what state is Comcast Corporation incorporated, and who is its independent auditor and auditor tenure?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in Pennsylvania, and its independent auditor is Deloitte & Touche LLP, which has served as auditor since 1963.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0001166691-25-000011`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n1. **State of Incorporation:**\n * **Pennsylvania** (disclosed on the cover page of Form 10-K, character offset ~1,700–1,900).\n\n2. **Independent Auditor:**\n * **Deloitte & Touche LLP** (disclosed in *Management's Report on Financial Statements* and the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*, character offset ~264,000–270,000).\n\n3. **Auditor Tenure:**\n * **Insufficient evidence in the retrieved text:** The tool budget was exhausted before reaching the signature block and tenure statement of the auditor's report (typically found at the end of the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*).", "correctness": 60, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies Pennsylvania as the state of incorporation and Deloitte & Touche LLP as the auditor, both supported by the retrieved text (the cover page and the Management's Report). It omits the auditor tenure (since 1963), which the reference includes and which is answerable from the filing, so the answer is only partly complete. The abstention on tenure is honest, since the retrieved text stops before the tenure statement, but it does not make the answer fully correct. Citation support is strong for the auditor and state claims. The character-offset range for Pennsylvania (~1,700–1,900) is approximate and not directly verified by the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04617865, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04417425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0020044, "wall_seconds": 34.183293924999816, "api_seconds": 32.12183213300341, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 70453, "completion_tokens": 1698, "reasoning_tokens": 564, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/81e523951475d477976010e0.json", "detail_js": "details/81e523951475d477976010e0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/81e523951475d477976010e0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8d1230e59f3c405d8eb0555ec9ab7860.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7f98354f663a44468f33a121410675fb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b0b7404450521171e2736058", "question_id": "Q012", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In what state is Comcast Corporation incorporated, and who is its independent auditor and auditor tenure?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in Pennsylvania, and its independent auditor is Deloitte & Touche LLP, which has served as auditor since 1963.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in **Pennsylvania**. Its independent auditor is **Deloitte & Touche LLP**, which states that it has served as Comcast’s auditor **since 1963**.\n\n**Evidence:** Comcast’s 2025 8-K identifies Pennsylvania as its state of incorporation (filing `0001166691-25-000027`, `sfd-v1-2025-06.parquet`, filing text). The 2024 Form 10-K’s auditor report is signed by Deloitte & Touche LLP and says, “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1963” (filing `0001166691-25-000011`, `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, around character 283,800).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all three facts: Pennsylvania incorporation, Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditor, and auditor tenure since 1963. The Pennsylvania claim is supported by the 8-K tool output, which shows 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: PA' and 'Pennsylvania (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)'. The auditor and tenure claims are supported by the 10-K substring output, which shows the Deloitte signature and 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1963.' near offset 283,800, under accession 0001166691-25-000011. The candidate's 'around character 283,800' is consistent with the query. Minor deduction: the candidate labels the 8-K as the source of incorporation without a direct quote of the cover-page text, and it cites Pennsylvania from the 8-K header rather than the 10-K, which is still supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003129385, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001670685, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014587, "wall_seconds": 33.168935546000284, "api_seconds": 31.08270051400359, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 48090, "completion_tokens": 1607, "reasoning_tokens": 523, "cache_read_tokens": 29596, "excerpt_characters": 7800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000932471-25-000681", "0001096906-25-000908", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000018", "0001166691-25-000024", "0001166691-25-000027", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-112799", "0001193125-25-112904", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001193125-25-115996", "0001214659-25-006775", "0001225208-25-003902", "0001225208-25-003905", "0001225208-25-003908", "0001225208-25-003909", "0001225208-25-004824", "0001225208-25-005142", "0001225208-25-005426", "0001225208-25-005772", "0001225208-25-006092", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/b0b7404450521171e2736058.json", "detail_js": "details/b0b7404450521171e2736058.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b0b7404450521171e2736058.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5960e924c8714578bb5c3e543654a95e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/21f48e823b384118897364f9d85c0baf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8b983ed89f0d7c639e3dcccd", "question_id": "Q012", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In what state is Comcast Corporation incorporated, and who is its independent auditor and auditor tenure?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in Pennsylvania, and its independent auditor is Deloitte & Touche LLP, which has served as auditor since 1963.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Comcast Corporation is incorporated in **Pennsylvania**. The filing’s cover page explicitly identifies Pennsylvania as its state of incorporation (file stem `0001166691-25-000018`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-04.parquet`, returned passage at character offset 0).\n\nThe returned evidence does **not** establish the name of Comcast’s independent auditor or the auditor’s tenure, so I can’t answer those parts reliably.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly answers the state of incorporation (Pennsylvania), and the tool output supports this: the returned passage from 0001166691-25-000018 at character offset 0 shows 'STATE OF INCORPORATION: PA' and 'Pennsylvania (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)' on the cover page. The candidate is accurate in saying the retrieved evidence does not name the auditor or tenure, and it appropriately declines to guess. However, the reference treats the auditor (Deloitte & Touche LLP) and tenure (since 1963) as answerable, so the response is incomplete: it omits two of the three requested facts. The abstention is not a full match because the reference is answerable. The candidate did not reach the Item 8 auditor report the gold evidence cites (accession 0001166691-25-000011), which does not appear in the tool outputs. The lack of evidence explains the omission but does not make the partial answer fully correct. Citation support is high because the one claim made is directly backed by the retrieved text, and the file stem and offset are reported accurately.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00502901, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0030938100000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019352, "wall_seconds": 37.272310833999654, "api_seconds": 34.02070020799874, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 61102, "completion_tokens": 1627, "reasoning_tokens": 624, "cache_read_tokens": 26236, "excerpt_characters": 18827, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000932471-25-000681", "0001096906-25-000908", "0001166691-25-000018", "0001166691-25-000021", "0001166691-25-000024", "0001166691-25-000027", "0001193125-25-112799", "0001193125-25-112904", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001193125-25-115996", "0001214659-25-006775", "0001225208-25-003902", "0001225208-25-003905", "0001225208-25-003908", "0001225208-25-003909", "0001225208-25-004824", "0001225208-25-005142", "0001225208-25-005426", "0001225208-25-005772", "0001225208-25-006092", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8b983ed89f0d7c639e3dcccd.json", "detail_js": "details/8b983ed89f0d7c639e3dcccd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8b983ed89f0d7c639e3dcccd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4a7f383720824053b4ad78107874aa0c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f92b69370be345b49e71948e054bce8f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fe99cd9f2d5b3cee369d0e23", "question_id": "Q013", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Citigroup Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 1969.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Citigroup Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / `file_stem`: `0000831001-25-000067`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n1. **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**: \n **KPMG LLP** serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm (evidenced in the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* preceding the Consolidated Financial Statements, containing KPMG's auditor logo/report: `![kpmgpica12.jpg](c-20241231_g13.jpg)` and opinions on the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting).\n\n2. **Year Since Which They Have Served**:\n *Limitation*: Due to the tool budget being exhausted before locating the tenure disclosure sentence at the end of the auditor's report or in the proxy statement/notes, the filing text retrieved within the budget does not contain the specific year since which KPMG has served as auditor.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies the filing (accession 0000831001-25-000067, FY2024 10-K) and the auditor as KPMG, but omits the reference's key second part, the year 1969. The gold evidence sentence ('We have served as the Company's auditor since 1969') was not retrieved in the tool outputs, and the candidate transparently says so. That makes the answer partly complete, not fully wrong. Citation support is moderate: the audit report text and the 'kpmgpica12.jpg' logo reference in the tool output support the auditor's identity and the report's location, but the tool output never literally spells out 'KPMG LLP', so the name is an inference from the logo filename. The candidate also did not state the year, so there is no unsupported tenure claim to penalize.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0356375, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0341655, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001472, "wall_seconds": 34.40966504300013, "api_seconds": 32.096056571997906, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52559, "completion_tokens": 1543, "reasoning_tokens": 380, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 13000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fe99cd9f2d5b3cee369d0e23.json", "detail_js": "details/fe99cd9f2d5b3cee369d0e23.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fe99cd9f2d5b3cee369d0e23.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f224d73f2e5e4aa986d7a196e78603a9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/13ec06b03c624e1c885e580b8c7a6f45.request.json" }, { "task_id": "92440752c5ac50c01ccbea64", "question_id": "Q013", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Citigroup Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 1969.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Citigroup Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, File Stem: `0000831001-25-000067`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **KPMG LLP**\n* **Year Served as Auditor Since:** **1969**\n\n---\n\n### Source & Evidence\n* **Filing:** Citigroup Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024\n* **Report:** *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* (Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data)\n* **Citation:** \n > \"/s/ KPMG LLP \n > We have served as the Company's auditor since 1969. \n > New York, New York \n > February 21, 2025\" \n *(offsets ~640,525 to 641,500)*", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names KPMG LLP and the year 1969, matching the reference. The tool output for the read at offset 640525 contains '/s/ KPMG LLP' followed by 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1969.' and 'New York, New York February 21, 2025', so the quoted citation is supported. The accession 0000831001-25-000067 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet also match the tool results. The stated offsets (~640,525 to 641,500) are approximate and were not separately verified, which is a minor deduction. The answer is complete and the dates and entities are correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0421799, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.039676499999999996, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025034, "wall_seconds": 29.718475779000073, "api_seconds": 27.890987871000107, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 72141, "completion_tokens": 1159, "reasoning_tokens": 267, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/92440752c5ac50c01ccbea64.json", "detail_js": "details/92440752c5ac50c01ccbea64.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/92440752c5ac50c01ccbea64.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/32b99fa98af1461db38de39a5887642c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a566eefc35264704b0f10d6228ff3c89.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2aace8e3bb6e546d221b3bff", "question_id": "Q013", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Citigroup Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 1969.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I verified Citigroup Inc.’s identity in a filing in the provided data, but couldn’t retrieve a filing passage establishing the auditor and the year it began serving. The available evidence is insufficient to answer reliably.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: KPMG LLP, auditor since 1969, supported by gold evidence. The candidate abstained and gave no auditor name or year, so it is incomplete and does not match the reference. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which it is not here. The candidate's stated facts do match the tool outputs: the CITIGROUP INC / CIK 0000831001 identity was confirmed, and the auditor-passage lookups returned errors or unrelated content. The candidate also never reached the cited accession 0000831001-25-000067, so its failure to find the passage is honest but unresolved.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002883975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001711575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011724, "wall_seconds": 37.28771481399963, "api_seconds": 36.08952648800005, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45402, "completion_tokens": 1549, "reasoning_tokens": 477, "cache_read_tokens": 28900, "excerpt_characters": 1000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950103-25-001749", "0000950103-25-001854", "0000950103-25-002449", "0000950103-25-002734", "0000950103-25-002778", "0000950103-25-003087", "0000950103-25-003385", "0000950103-25-003404", "0000950103-25-003526", "0000950103-25-003646", "0000950103-25-003684", "0000950103-25-003781", "0000950103-25-003990", "0000950103-25-004049", "0000950103-25-006875", "0000950103-25-006880", "0000950103-25-006881", "0000950103-25-007014", "0000950103-25-007045", "0000950103-25-007118", "0000950103-25-007200", "0000950103-25-007321", "0000950103-25-007382", "0000950103-25-007450", "0000950103-25-007524", "0000950103-25-007566", "0000950170-25-022366", "0001918704-25-001816", "0001918704-25-001867", "0001918704-25-002238", "0001918704-25-002260", "0001918704-25-002261", "0001918704-25-002543", "0001918704-25-002859", "0001918704-25-003062", "0001918704-25-003273", "0001918704-25-003411", "0001918704-25-003639", "0001918704-25-004028", "0001918704-25-004031", "0001918704-25-004130", "0001918704-25-004287", "0001918704-25-004445", "0001918704-25-004664", "0001918704-25-004701", "0001918704-25-005220", "0001918704-25-005440", "0001918704-25-008740", "0001918704-25-008744", "0001918704-25-008864", "0001918704-25-008948", "0001918704-25-009252", "0001918704-25-009256", "0001918704-25-009274", "0001918704-25-009523" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/2aace8e3bb6e546d221b3bff.json", "detail_js": "details/2aace8e3bb6e546d221b3bff.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2aace8e3bb6e546d221b3bff.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a2493b3037b3459cbe58fbfeeb54c5b1.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/96790bbcfbd145d5a2e8ddab3d40388b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a87cc82105833909ca6e6001", "question_id": "Q013", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as Citigroup Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "KPMG LLP is Citigroup Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 1969.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Citigroup’s independent registered public accounting firm is **KPMG LLP**. The 2025 proxy statement says KPMG has served Citi and its predecessors as auditor **since 1969**.\n\n**Source:** Citigroup 2025 proxy statement, `file_stem` `0001145443-25-000075`, file `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`, passage at characters 207,190–219,190.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names KPMG LLP and gives 1969 as the start year, matching the reference. The tool output at characters 207,190–219,190 of file_stem 0001145443-25-000075 (sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet) directly states that KPMG has served as Citi's independent registered public accounting firm 'and its predecessors since 1969', so the claims and the cited source are supported. The reference's gold quote comes from an Item 8 10-K passage that does not appear in the tool evidence, so it was not used for citation scoring. The candidate's answer is a faithful paraphrase of the proxy text, with only a minor wording difference ('Citi and its predecessors') that does not change the substance.", "known_cost_usd": 0.005454125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002801425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026527, "wall_seconds": 32.97257378499853, "api_seconds": 31.587202767996132, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 76028, "completion_tokens": 1448, "reasoning_tokens": 575, "cache_read_tokens": 36280, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950103-25-002829", "0000950103-25-003090", "0000950103-25-003100", "0000950103-25-003162", "0000950103-25-003188", "0000950103-25-003223", "0000950103-25-003263", "0000950103-25-003385", "0000950103-25-003437", "0000950103-25-003510", "0000950103-25-003512", "0000950103-25-003684", "0000950103-25-003789", "0000950103-25-003991", "0000950103-25-006875", "0000950103-25-006880", "0000950103-25-006881", "0000950103-25-007014", "0000950103-25-007045", "0000950103-25-007118", "0000950103-25-007200", "0000950103-25-007321", "0000950103-25-007382", "0000950103-25-007450", "0000950103-25-007524", "0000950103-25-007566", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-045581", "0001193125-25-060060", "0001206774-25-000136", "0001918704-25-004874", "0001918704-25-005355", "0001918704-25-008740", "0001918704-25-008744", "0001918704-25-008864", "0001918704-25-008948", "0001918704-25-009252", "0001918704-25-009256", "0001918704-25-009274", "0001918704-25-009523" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a87cc82105833909ca6e6001.json", "detail_js": "details/a87cc82105833909ca6e6001.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a87cc82105833909ca6e6001.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5e04234c17ea4595b9ce9746ac7a7a66.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b25b5c52aa4f4ba0a8a7c6fceb4715f7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "62a42028674e208c2d9d459a", "question_id": "Q014", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s auditor, having served as auditor since 1922.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File Stem: `0000886982-25-000005`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**\n* **Year Served Since:** **1922**\n\n### Evidence\nFrom the *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* (character offset ~659,200):\n> \"/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP \n> New York, New York \n> February 26, 2025 \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1922.\"", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and 1922, matching the reference and gold evidence. The tool output supports both: the substring at offset 658800 shows '/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 1922', and the 10-K header confirms period 20241231 and accession 0000886982-25-000005. The candidate's offset (~659,200) is a rounded approximation of the strpos hit at 659,253, and its quote is reformatted with line breaks, so citation support is not perfect but the claims are well grounded.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0364401, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0352815, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011586, "wall_seconds": 33.39295416399909, "api_seconds": 30.712164175003636, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 51038, "completion_tokens": 1518, "reasoning_tokens": 368, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-042819", "0000950170-25-056387", "0000950170-25-080369", "0000950170-25-080950", "0000950170-25-081016", "0000950170-25-081632", "0000950170-25-083244", "0000950170-25-084419", "0000950170-25-084577", "0000950170-25-086181", "0000950170-25-087434", "0000950170-25-088351", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-027379", "0001193125-25-054559" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/62a42028674e208c2d9d459a.json", "detail_js": "details/62a42028674e208c2d9d459a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/62a42028674e208c2d9d459a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f595f2fa9e704f8cb4f91022e76945cf.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9b5d85dbd4154687a68281ebaed88f83.request.json" }, { "task_id": "caf4bcfa4cb49b2ea2ec7878", "question_id": "Q014", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s auditor, having served as auditor since 1922.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, File Stem: `0000886982-25-000005`, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page 130):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**\n* **Serving since:** **1922** (\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1922.\")", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and 1922, matching the reference. The tool output from read_filing contains the signature '/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP' and the sentence 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1922.' The quote is followed by the page marker '130', so the page citation is supported. The accession 0000886982-25-000005 and the 2024 Form 10-K label also appear in the returned text. The only minor gap is that the form type is inferred from the '2024 Form 10-K' header rather than from a metadata field.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04066715, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03869625, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019709, "wall_seconds": 30.019969978000518, "api_seconds": 28.219447515995853, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 65414, "completion_tokens": 1178, "reasoning_tokens": 316, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000950170-25-021504", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/caf4bcfa4cb49b2ea2ec7878.json", "detail_js": "details/caf4bcfa4cb49b2ea2ec7878.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/caf4bcfa4cb49b2ea2ec7878.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/44c0ee3999c8469bbe34f8ee506ce48a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/94bb5a0c57ed40f296ed8ceb23107d40.request.json" }, { "task_id": "162b49fca865abf73b4c3b52", "question_id": "Q014", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s auditor, having served as auditor since 1922.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t establish the answer from the available results. The metadata identifies Goldman Sachs filings, but the selected filing could not be read because the tool reported a duplicate filing ID. I therefore can’t verify the accounting firm or the year it began serving.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a definite answer (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, auditor since 1922), and the gold evidence is an Item 8 quote. The question is answerable, so abstaining does not earn full credit. The candidate names no firm and no year, so it misses both parts of the question. Its abstention is honest, and it does not state any false facts. Citation support is moderately strong: the tool outputs do show repeated 'Duplicate filing ID in source' errors on the filings it tried to read, which supports its explanation. Its claim that the metadata 'identifies Goldman Sachs filings' is only loosely supported, since the query results show accession 0000886982 without an explicit company name. The candidate also did not try other filings from the search results that were not blocked by the duplicate-ID error, so the failure to answer is partly self-inflicted.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002562435, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001458735, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011037, "wall_seconds": 31.73713632900035, "api_seconds": 30.766046894001192, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35831, "completion_tokens": 1555, "reasoning_tokens": 645, "cache_read_tokens": 21671, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000187", "0000769993-25-000207", "0000769993-25-000230", "0000769993-25-000231", "0000769993-25-000232", "0000769993-25-000234", "0000769993-25-000235", "0000769993-25-000236", "0000769993-25-000237", "0000769993-25-000238", "0000769993-25-000239", "0000769993-25-000240", "0000769993-25-000241", "0000769993-25-000242", "0000769993-25-000243", "0000769993-25-000244", "0000769993-25-000245", "0000769993-25-000246", "0000769993-25-000247", "0000769993-25-000248", "0000950170-25-048388", "0000950170-25-049342", "0000950170-25-049347", "0000950170-25-050280", "0000950170-25-050981", "0000950170-25-052513", "0000950170-25-052711", "0000950170-25-052902", "0000950170-25-053312", "0000950170-25-053686", "0000950170-25-055138", "0000950170-25-055261", "0000950170-25-057883", "0000950170-25-058842", "0000950170-25-058876", "0000950170-25-059103", "0000950170-25-060019", "0000950170-25-060103", "0000950170-25-060270", "0000950170-25-061129", "0000950170-25-080165", "0000950170-25-080720", "0000950170-25-080946", "0000950170-25-080973", "0000950170-25-081023", "0000950170-25-081043", "0000950170-25-081074", "0000950170-25-081540", "0000950170-25-081677", "0000950170-25-081679", "0000950170-25-082090", "0000950170-25-082530", "0000950170-25-082734", "0000950170-25-084366", "0000950170-25-084912", "0000950170-25-085728", "0000950170-25-087176", "0000950170-25-088333", "0000950170-25-088335", "0000950170-25-088336" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/162b49fca865abf73b4c3b52.json", "detail_js": "details/162b49fca865abf73b4c3b52.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/162b49fca865abf73b4c3b52.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e9c0344506134e67a82d5b0d2c2dacd9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ef0c7165502b4203a594f9a65c60641e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "14e19de60b28f60b65d3e22d", "question_id": "Q014", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s auditor, having served as auditor since 1922.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t establish the auditor or the year they began serving from the returned evidence. The filing lookup failed because the source reported a duplicate filing ID, and no auditor passage was retrieved.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, auditor since 1922. The candidate abstains, which does not meet the standard for full credit because the reference is answerable. It provides no auditor name or year, so completeness is missing, though it does not state anything false. Its claims are well supported by the tool outputs: the read_filing call returned 'Duplicate filing accession in source', the duckdb excerpt query returned 'Duplicate filing ID in source', and no auditor passage was retrieved. The candidate's account of the failure is accurate and transparent. The gold evidence was not retrieved by any tool call shown, so the candidate correctly did not cite it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00323638, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00220058, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010358, "wall_seconds": 30.099031564999677, "api_seconds": 28.892904224998347, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 45137, "completion_tokens": 1246, "reasoning_tokens": 320, "cache_read_tokens": 24453, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000891836-25-000009", "0000950170-25-001792", "0000950170-25-003525", "0000950170-25-004852", "0000950170-25-005317", "0000950170-25-005378", "0000950170-25-006503", "0000950170-25-006771", "0000950170-25-007181", "0000950170-25-007368", "0000950170-25-007382", "0000950170-25-007493", "0000950170-25-007866", "0000950170-25-008840", "0000950170-25-009084", "0000950170-25-009246", "0000950170-25-009541", "0000950170-25-010474", "0000950170-25-011696", "0000950170-25-031876", "0000950170-25-032137", "0000950170-25-032851", "0000950170-25-034306", "0000950170-25-037079", "0000950170-25-037830", "0000950170-25-039071", "0000950170-25-039460", "0000950170-25-039588", "0000950170-25-040691", "0000950170-25-041110", "0000950170-25-041322", "0000950170-25-041807", "0000950170-25-042076", "0000950170-25-043261", "0000950170-25-043915", "0000950170-25-043919", "0000950170-25-043929", "0000950170-25-045091", "0000950170-25-047861", "0000950170-25-047982", "0000950170-25-048651", "0000950170-25-049347", "0000950170-25-049414", "0000950170-25-050992", "0000950170-25-051432", "0000950170-25-052041", "0000950170-25-053283", "0000950170-25-053618", "0000950170-25-054931", "0000950170-25-055640", "0000950170-25-056217", "0000950170-25-056387", "0000950170-25-058263", "0000950170-25-060047", "0000950170-25-060309", "0000950170-25-060357", "0000950170-25-060462", "0000950170-25-060707", "0000950170-25-061104", "0002021544-25-000002" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/14e19de60b28f60b65d3e22d.json", "detail_js": "details/14e19de60b28f60b65d3e22d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/14e19de60b28f60b65d3e22d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2567a2491e9643e1b882f74332b59fd2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/86a34ad597f9440b8c5c10bada2b9c9e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fde5831f4c98c06a7ad08a97", "question_id": "Q015", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is ConocoPhillips's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is ConocoPhillips's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1949.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0001163165-25-000012`, file: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** Ernst & Young LLP\n* **Year they have served as auditor since:** 1949\n\n*(Source: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, ConocoPhillips 2024 Form 10-K, page 74: \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP / We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949.\")*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1949, matching the reference. The quoted text \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949\" appears verbatim in the duckdb_query output for accession 0001163165-25-000012, and the page marker \"ConocoPhillips 2024 10-K 74\" is also in that output. The December 31, 2024 fiscal year is supported by the \"as of December 31, 2024\" text in the same output. The candidate cites the report section by name rather than \"Item 8\" as the gold evidence does, which is a minor labeling difference. Citation support is slightly below full because the tool output shows the auditor text but not the explicit \"Item 8\" heading.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02702225, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.026013750000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010085, "wall_seconds": 38.07960292300049, "api_seconds": 37.110531962001915, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 36320, "completion_tokens": 1690, "reasoning_tokens": 855, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019431", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000023", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000310" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/fde5831f4c98c06a7ad08a97.json", "detail_js": "details/fde5831f4c98c06a7ad08a97.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fde5831f4c98c06a7ad08a97.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9eb996c7f2d044598d5a29614bb551f4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/74fc3b9785af4a5ca02a9f84772d4776.request.json" }, { "task_id": "25f5981f0247e2246508d757", "question_id": "Q015", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is ConocoPhillips's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is ConocoPhillips's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1949.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File Stem: `0001163165-25-000012`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP**\n* **Year Served Since:** **1949** (\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949.\")", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1949, matching the reference. The read_filing output in the tool evidence contains the auditor signature block '/s/ Ernst & Young LLP' followed by 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949,' and the accession 0001163165-25-000012 appears in the retrieved filing record, so both claims and the citation are directly supported by the tool evidence. The candidate's fiscal year label (FYE December 31, 2024) is consistent with the audit report's dates. Minor noise in the candidate's failed queries does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0165448, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.015636, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009088, "wall_seconds": 19.93541896700117, "api_seconds": 18.927228173000913, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26666, "completion_tokens": 654, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/25f5981f0247e2246508d757.json", "detail_js": "details/25f5981f0247e2246508d757.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/25f5981f0247e2246508d757.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cedcf2551a7e49769aacb240b9f04942.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cc81801b99494320b6f3a32b117c1508.request.json" }, { "task_id": "846015078b9b17f0e2d44353", "question_id": "Q015", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is ConocoPhillips's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is ConocoPhillips's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1949.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "ConocoPhillips’s independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP**. The company says EY has served as its auditor **since 1949**.\n\nEvidence: ConocoPhillips 2024 Form 10-K, file stem `0001163165-25-000012`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the auditor’s report names Ernst & Young LLP and states, “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1949.”", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies Ernst & Young LLP and the service start year 1949, matching the reference. The tool output directly shows the auditor's report signed '/s/ Ernst & Young LLP' followed by 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1949' within the 2024 10-K (accession 0001163165-25-000012, sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet), so the quoted evidence is fully supported. The candidate's quote and file reference match the tool output exactly; the answer is complete and no unsupported claims are made.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0023966449999999998, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001445345, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009513, "wall_seconds": 26.111646265999298, "api_seconds": 24.73180448399944, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 36114, "completion_tokens": 972, "reasoning_tokens": 123, "cache_read_tokens": 20642, "excerpt_characters": 4400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-005080", "0000950170-25-048952", "0000950170-25-048958", "0000950170-25-062038", "0000950170-25-062047", "0000950170-25-080221", "0000950170-25-080242", "0000950170-25-080262", "0000950170-25-087139", "0001096906-25-000478", "0001104659-25-033749", "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-046174", "0001104659-25-047855", "0001104659-25-049593", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000023", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000310", "9999999995-25-001631" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/846015078b9b17f0e2d44353.json", "detail_js": "details/846015078b9b17f0e2d44353.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/846015078b9b17f0e2d44353.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/86de3a1bf8da4cb993a1d2154964c14b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7307875deb244df186af06b9183e5104.request.json" }, { "task_id": "462204d02624ccffbe2973ae", "question_id": "Q015", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is ConocoPhillips's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is ConocoPhillips's independent auditor, and they have served as the company's auditor since 1949.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t verify the auditor and the year they began serving from the passages I was able to read, so I can’t give a sourced answer. The ConocoPhillips filing I checked was a Form 10-Q and did not establish that information.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as answerable: Ernst & Young LLP, auditor since 1949, per the Item 8 auditor report in accession 0001163165-25-000012. The candidate abstained, so it gives neither the firm nor the year and is incorrect on an answerable question. Its tool-based claims are supported: the 10-Q it checked (0001163165-25-000025) returned no 'independent registered' match, and its 'auditor' hits were only certification text. The 10-K Item 8 filing containing the gold quote was never retrieved, and two other reads failed with duplicate-accession errors, so the abstention is honest about the search but does not excuse the missing answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00293932, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00166122, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012781, "wall_seconds": 34.4011923399994, "api_seconds": 32.1885016369979, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 44965, "completion_tokens": 1624, "reasoning_tokens": 891, "cache_read_tokens": 28207, "excerpt_characters": 6560, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-005080", "0000950170-25-048952", "0000950170-25-048958", "0000950170-25-062038", "0000950170-25-062047", "0000950170-25-080221", "0000950170-25-080242", "0000950170-25-080262", "0000950170-25-087139", "0001096906-25-000478", "0001104659-25-033749", "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-046174", "0001104659-25-047855", "0001104659-25-049593", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000023", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000309", "9999999995-25-001631" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/462204d02624ccffbe2973ae.json", "detail_js": "details/462204d02624ccffbe2973ae.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/462204d02624ccffbe2973ae.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ea4168f30df74b9086b289b8d73f9a77.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/17e2454d0b234286bb4482b3f3265a00.request.json" }, { "task_id": "91f54d323288a829b557a6d6", "question_id": "Q016", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Where are Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices located, and who serves as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229, and its auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (serving since 2010).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / `file_stem`: `0001510295-25-000012`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### 1. Principal Executive Offices\nMarathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at:\n* **Address:** 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229\n* **Telephone:** (419) 422-2121\n\n---\n\n### 2. Auditor\n* In the Form 10-K table of contents for Item 8 (Financial Statements and Supplementary Data), the **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm** lists **PCAOB ID 238** (which corresponds to **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**). \n* *(Note: Because the tool budget was exhausted before reading the signature line of the audit opinion directly, the specific firm name within the filing text could not be extracted directly beyond the PCAOB ID 238 identifier.)*", "correctness": 65, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The principal executive office address (539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229) matches the reference and is directly supported by the 10-K cover page in the tool output. The telephone number is also supported. For the auditor, the candidate retrieved only the Item 8 table-of-contents entry showing 'PCAOB ID 238'. The name 'PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP' is not in the tool evidence; it comes from the candidate's own knowledge of PCAOB IDs. The candidate does disclose this gap, which is honest. However, it never confirms the firm name from the filing and omits the 'since 2010' tenure stated in the gold evidence. The auditor half is therefore only partly correct and only partly supported, while the address half is fully correct and supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0390686, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.037524, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015446, "wall_seconds": 35.228027544000724, "api_seconds": 32.581113666998135, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57363, "completion_tokens": 1623, "reasoning_tokens": 407, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025", "0001510295-25-000039" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/91f54d323288a829b557a6d6.json", "detail_js": "details/91f54d323288a829b557a6d6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/91f54d323288a829b557a6d6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c2dfe3f240c34d21890b5898199b7378.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/adf5c833c9fb42a88adab4d2e9eba05b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d27d8e3ca784c85e2f5ba9d1", "question_id": "Q016", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Where are Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices located, and who serves as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229, and its auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (serving since 2010).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0001510295-25-000012`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n1. **Principal Executive Offices Location:**\n * **Address:** 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229 (Source: Form 10-K cover page).\n\n2. **Auditor:**\n * **Auditor Name:** **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP** (located in Toledo, Ohio), who has served as the company's auditor since 2010 (Source: *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*, Item 8).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same principal executive office address as the reference (539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229) and names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor since 2010, matching the reference on both parts. The address appears on the 10-K cover page in the retrieved read_filing output. The auditor name and the 'since 2010' statement appear in the Item 8 audit report text the tools returned, and the Toledo, Ohio location matches the audit report signature. The sources cited (cover page, Item 8 audit report) and the accession/file identifiers match the tool output. The only minor gap is that the candidate's citation for the auditor relies on the gold quote's section, which is consistent with the retrieved text. No factual errors found.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05380525, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.051069750000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0027355, "wall_seconds": 33.597646029000316, "api_seconds": 30.394191285002307, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 89288, "completion_tokens": 1232, "reasoning_tokens": 247, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001665", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001669", "0000950170-25-001671", "0000950170-25-001673", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001678", "0000950170-25-001681", "0000950170-25-001684", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000002", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d27d8e3ca784c85e2f5ba9d1.json", "detail_js": "details/d27d8e3ca784c85e2f5ba9d1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d27d8e3ca784c85e2f5ba9d1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b0298d7c94fa4b89a212111988275b9c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/68324a2ca06f4beaa03cf44285a4a8f3.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7daea0de843e6c9159408d11", "question_id": "Q016", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Where are Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices located, and who serves as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229, and its auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (serving since 2010).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation’s principal executive offices are at **539 South Main Street, Findlay, Ohio 45840-3229**. The cited filing identifies an independent registered public accounting firm by **PCAOB ID 238**, but the returned evidence does not show the firm’s name, so I can’t reliably identify the auditor.\n\n**Evidence:** 2024 Form 10-K, file stem `0001510295-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. The address appears in the opening text at approximately characters 1,800–2,300; the auditor reference appears around character 355,400.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly gives the principal executive office address (539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229), which the tool output supports directly from the cover page and the header block. It fails the auditor half of the question. The reference names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, serving since 2010. The candidate abstains, saying the evidence does not show the firm's name. That abstention is not justified by the reference, which is answerable: the tool output shows 'pricewaterhousecoopers' in the filing and locates the phrase 'we have served as the company' at a position near the auditor report, but the candidate never read the auditor report text. The only PwC mention it read was in an executive biography, not as the auditor. The candidate's PCAOB ID 238 and the address claims are supported by the tool output. Its character-offset citations are roughly consistent with the reported positions.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0042179999999999995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0027507, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014673, "wall_seconds": 38.81492163999974, "api_seconds": 36.03055481800038, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55245, "completion_tokens": 1879, "reasoning_tokens": 692, "cache_read_tokens": 29070, "excerpt_characters": 5700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000932471-25-000588", "0000950170-25-032681", "0000950170-25-032698", "0000950170-25-032722", "0000950170-25-050598", "0000950170-25-050606", "0000950170-25-050633", "0000950170-25-050659", "0000950170-25-063129", "0000950170-25-063131", "0000950170-25-063133", "0000950170-25-063135", "0000950170-25-063138", "0000950170-25-063140", "0000950170-25-063142", "0000950170-25-063144", "0000950170-25-063146", "0000950170-25-063150", "0000950170-25-081448", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025", "0001510295-25-000035", "0001510295-25-000038", "0001510295-25-000039", "0001959173-25-003747" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7daea0de843e6c9159408d11.json", "detail_js": "details/7daea0de843e6c9159408d11.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7daea0de843e6c9159408d11.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7cddba1168134bf4b9388e205830b49c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/51b99a7098a64bbfb311e82e7619c107.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7484fbcda663ae5028acde2f", "question_id": "Q016", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Where are Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices located, and who serves as the company's auditor?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's principal executive offices are located at 539 South Main Street, Findlay, OH 45840-3229, and its auditor is PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (serving since 2010).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation’s principal executive offices are at **539 South Main Street, Findlay, Ohio 45840**. The 2025 Form 8-K identifies the company and gives that address (file_stem **0001510295-25-000005**, file_id **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**, characters **1018–13018**).\n\nThe returned evidence does **not** identify the company’s auditor, so I can’t establish who serves in that role from the available evidence.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The address is substantially correct: 539 South Main Street, Findlay, Ohio 45840 matches the reference's street, city, state, and base ZIP. It omits the ZIP+4 suffix (-3229), which is a minor completeness gap. The cited 8-K text and character offsets (1018-13018) are accurately reported from the tool output. The auditor half is not answered. The reference names PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (since 2010) and points to accession 0001510295-25-000012, which the candidate's own query returned but never successfully read because of memory errors. The candidate's abstention is honest and matches its evidence, but the reference shows the question was answerable from the corpus, so the abstention does not earn full correctness. Citation support is high because the address claim and the abstention are both grounded in the tool outputs; it is not 100 because the candidate never checked the 10-K that holds the auditor information.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004404825, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002832125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015727, "wall_seconds": 38.08395393700084, "api_seconds": 35.445505218995095, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52057, "completion_tokens": 1651, "reasoning_tokens": 628, "cache_read_tokens": 22645, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000932471-25-000588", "0000950170-25-050598", "0000950170-25-050633", "0000950170-25-050639", "0000950170-25-050694", "0000950170-25-063129", "0000950170-25-063131", "0000950170-25-063133", "0000950170-25-063135", "0000950170-25-063138", "0000950170-25-063140", "0000950170-25-063142", "0000950170-25-063144", "0000950170-25-063146", "0000950170-25-063150", "0000950170-25-081448", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000035", "0001510295-25-000038", "0001510295-25-000039", "0001959173-25-003747", "0002052113-25-001512" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7484fbcda663ae5028acde2f.json", "detail_js": "details/7484fbcda663ae5028acde2f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7484fbcda663ae5028acde2f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/26b2a89cc3ee4d40b2fe57a69e71e4d0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5eb28cd6fa024edf8e129a6d55c370d3.request.json" }, { "task_id": "60432477f90b8ff3775dd987", "question_id": "Q017", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Whirlpool Corporation's independent auditor, having served as auditor since 1927.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Whirlpool Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem `0000106640-25-000011`, filed February 13, 2025 in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Ernst & Young LLP**\n* **Year Served Since:** **1927**\n\n*(Reference: \"Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm\", signature block: \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP — We have served as the Company's auditor since 1927. Chicago, Illinois — February 13, 2025\".)*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and gives 1927 as the year the firm began serving as auditor, matching the reference. The tool output supports both: the auditor signature block reads '/s/ Ernst & Young LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 1927.' The filing details (10-K, period ending 2024-12-31, filed 2025-02-13, accession 0000106640-25-000011, sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet) are also supported by the header and file listing. The parenthetical quote is slightly condensed and joins separate lines with dashes, a minor formatting liberty that does not change meaning.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0374091, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0359805, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014286, "wall_seconds": 30.09422289000031, "api_seconds": 27.871620510997673, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 55105, "completion_tokens": 1431, "reasoning_tokens": 286, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/60432477f90b8ff3775dd987.json", "detail_js": "details/60432477f90b8ff3775dd987.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/60432477f90b8ff3775dd987.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1d96b134f45948a99db0a887ced28dcd.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/67161880c4fb4af58ae3c412834bd0d6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5d1295d9f2062a73135a2702", "question_id": "Q017", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Whirlpool Corporation's independent auditor, having served as auditor since 1927.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP**.\n\nThey have served as the Company's auditor since **1927**.\n\n### Source Evidence\nFrom Whirlpool Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID: `0000106640-25-000011`, File: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), in the **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**:\n> \"/s/ Ernst & Young LLP \n> We have served as the Company's auditor since 1927. \n> Chicago, Illinois \n> February 13, 2025\"", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly names Ernst & Young LLP and the year 1927, matching the reference and gold evidence. The quoted sentence 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 1927.' and the accession 0000106640-25-000011 appear verbatim in the read_filing tool output, and the Item 8 auditor report context is supported. The fiscal year end (December 31, 2024) and filing date details are consistent with the retrieved text. Failed earlier tool calls do not affect the supported answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02803265, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02656725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014654, "wall_seconds": 24.76342030500018, "api_seconds": 23.31017570399854, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 46122, "completion_tokens": 791, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/5d1295d9f2062a73135a2702.json", "detail_js": "details/5d1295d9f2062a73135a2702.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5d1295d9f2062a73135a2702.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2d024ea7ece94b94bbb417e232f76d48.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6f6c76f78724420dbe598d2ee2f126cf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1714de54a17a46a1ba98d6e7", "question_id": "Q017", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who is Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Whirlpool Corporation's independent auditor, having served as auditor since 1927.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Whirlpool Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025 is **Ernst & Young LLP**. The returned filing evidence does not state since what year they have served as auditor, so I can’t establish the tenure year from the available evidence.\n\n**Source:** Whirlpool 2025 proxy statement, file_stem `0001193125-25-047168`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`, excerpt at character offset 8,117 onward.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly names Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm. The proxy excerpt in the tool output (the ratification proposal for fiscal 2025, at about offset 8,117) supports this, and the cited file_stem and offset match. However, the candidate omits the tenure year. The reference gives 1927, which comes from the gold evidence (Item 8 of accession 0000106640-25-000011). That passage was never retrieved; the candidate's targeted searches for 'auditor since' hit only unrelated documents. The abstention on the year is honest and transparent, but the reference is answerable, so the answer is only partly correct. The citation score reflects that the firm-name claim is well supported, while the missing year has no support in the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.005216825, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003322925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018939, "wall_seconds": 34.39540799199858, "api_seconds": 32.46118755099815, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 69691, "completion_tokens": 1701, "reasoning_tokens": 504, "cache_read_tokens": 34360, "excerpt_characters": 12500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000043", "0000106640-25-000045", "0000106640-25-000047", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000053", "0000106640-25-000055", "0000106640-25-000057", "0000106640-25-000059", "0000106640-25-000061", "0000106640-25-000064", "0000106640-25-000066", "0000106640-25-000068", "0000106640-25-000072", "0000106640-25-000075", "0000106640-25-000076", "0000106640-25-000081", "0000106640-25-000086", "0000106640-25-000093", "0000106640-25-000096", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938", "0001193125-25-093529", "0001193125-25-137449", "0001193125-25-137998", "0001193125-25-138510", "0001193125-25-139153" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1714de54a17a46a1ba98d6e7.json", "detail_js": "details/1714de54a17a46a1ba98d6e7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1714de54a17a46a1ba98d6e7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/db121127776442828c3ab2c67ac09b6b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4b81b1996d0743eb82bf27a6fadf8df5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e01cd3ca6f10932b4b67365d", "question_id": "Q017", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who is Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served as auditor?", "reference": "Ernst & Young LLP is Whirlpool Corporation's independent auditor, having served as auditor since 1927.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Whirlpool Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm is **Ernst & Young LLP (EY)**. The 2025 proxy statement says EY has served as auditor **since 1927**.¹\n\n¹ Whirlpool Corporation 2025 Proxy Statement, file stem `0001193125-25-047168`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`, passage at character offsets 303,229–315,229.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Ernst & Young LLP and 1927 as the start year, matching the reference. The cited passage (file 0001193125-25-047168, sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet, offsets 303229–315229) appears in the tool output and states that EY 'has served as Whirlpool Corporation's independent registered public accounting firm since 1927.' The candidate's paraphrase and attribution to the 2025 proxy are supported. The gold quote comes from a different section (Item 8), so the proxy passage is a slightly different source, but it independently supports the answer. Minor deduction only for the source differing from the gold citation.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00425802, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00228812, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019699, "wall_seconds": 32.578890255999795, "api_seconds": 30.260497630999453, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 61313, "completion_tokens": 1391, "reasoning_tokens": 455, "cache_read_tokens": 31792, "excerpt_characters": 22121, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000043", "0000106640-25-000045", "0000106640-25-000047", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000053", "0000106640-25-000055", "0000106640-25-000057", "0000106640-25-000059", "0000106640-25-000061", "0000106640-25-000064", "0000106640-25-000066", "0000106640-25-000068", "0000106640-25-000072", "0000106640-25-000075", "0000106640-25-000076", "0000106640-25-000081", "0000106640-25-000086", "0000106640-25-000093", "0000106640-25-000096", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938", "0001193125-25-137449", "0001193125-25-137998", "0001193125-25-138510", "0001193125-25-139153" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/e01cd3ca6f10932b4b67365d.json", "detail_js": "details/e01cd3ca6f10932b4b67365d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e01cd3ca6f10932b4b67365d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bfb7854b286d4daeb9f88dd8387610ac.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/79103115be8c49309cf20f700eb5bd32.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d7a01a1d2bca5d5d4fa70392", "question_id": "Q018", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In what state is Morningstar, Inc. incorporated, and who serves as its independent auditor and since what year?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in Illinois, and its independent auditor is KPMG LLP, which has served as auditor since 2011.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession Number / file stem `0001289419-25-000041`, filed February 28, 2025, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n1. **State of Incorporation:** \n * **Illinois** (cover page of Form 10-K specifies the state of incorporation as Illinois).\n\n2. **Independent Auditor & Tenure:**\n * **Auditor:** **KPMG LLP** (Chicago, Illinois)\n * **Serving Since:** **2011** (as stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: *\"/s/ KPMG LLP — We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011.\"*).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all three facts: Illinois incorporation, KPMG LLP as auditor, and auditor since 2011. Its supporting details are also backed by the tool output: the header shows STATE OF INCORPORATION: IL and the cover page lists Illinois, the filing date is February 28, 2025, and the auditor signature block shows Chicago, Illinois. The quoted auditor-tenure sentence is a near-verbatim rendering of the tool text, with the signature line joined by an em dash, which is a minor formatting liberty rather than a substantive change.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0318456, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.030634500000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012111, "wall_seconds": 32.150323514000775, "api_seconds": 29.021472396998433, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45712, "completion_tokens": 1449, "reasoning_tokens": 294, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001289419-25-000073" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d7a01a1d2bca5d5d4fa70392.json", "detail_js": "details/d7a01a1d2bca5d5d4fa70392.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d7a01a1d2bca5d5d4fa70392.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d70e6ce18e80494185b665d888b89b92.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2c4ae93d78c047ff8e58773b31741b39.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c76f52703f5f90136c307409", "question_id": "Q018", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In what state is Morningstar, Inc. incorporated, and who serves as its independent auditor and since what year?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in Illinois, and its independent auditor is KPMG LLP, which has served as auditor since 2011.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches performed within the available tool budget, the relevant SEC filings (such as Form 10-K or Form DEF 14A) for **Morningstar, Inc.** were not successfully located and inspected. Consequently, the returned evidence is **insufficient** to confirm Morningstar, Inc.'s state of incorporation, independent registered public accounting firm (auditor), or the year since which the auditor has served.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: it gives Illinois, KPMG LLP, and service since 2011, supported by gold evidence from the Morningstar 10-K Item 8. The candidate abstains and gives none of these three facts. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, so correctness is 0. Citation support is high because the tool outputs do support the candidate's narrower claim. The Morningstar company search returned no rows, the DuckDB query failed on a missing column, another query ran out of memory, and the only fetched filing was Extra Space Storage, not Morningstar. The candidate accurately reports that its searches failed, though it does not say the relevant filing was never reached.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0411089, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0396495, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014594, "wall_seconds": 31.542328284000178, "api_seconds": 29.88564948500425, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 61685, "completion_tokens": 1155, "reasoning_tokens": 222, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-002109", "0000093751-25-000021", "0000315066-25-000888", "0000912938-25-000036", "0000950103-25-001664", "0000950103-25-001998", "0000950103-25-002121", "0000950103-25-002201", "0001004980-25-000008", "0001004980-25-000010", "0001004980-25-000012", "0001004980-25-000014", "0001004980-25-000016", "0001004980-25-000018", "0001004980-25-000020", "0001004980-25-000022", "0001193125-25-036754", "0001562230-25-000051", "0001628280-25-009060", "0001921094-25-000091", "0001921094-25-000099" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c76f52703f5f90136c307409.json", "detail_js": "details/c76f52703f5f90136c307409.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c76f52703f5f90136c307409.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6869bcc57e33463d9d40bde5d06dbe95.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/abf144849ec64009aa45f351e955601a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "04ed1d495d01acb4c848bd4b", "question_id": "Q018", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In what state is Morningstar, Inc. incorporated, and who serves as its independent auditor and since what year?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in Illinois, and its independent auditor is KPMG LLP, which has served as auditor since 2011.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in **Illinois**. Its independent auditor is **KPMG LLP**, which the 2025 10-K says has served as the company’s auditor **since 2011**.\n\n**Evidence:** Morningstar’s 2025 10-K, file stem `0001289419-25-000041`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, identifies the state of incorporation as “IL” and states: “We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.”", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer matches the reference: incorporation in Illinois (tool evidence shows STATE OF INCORPORATION: IL in the 10-K header), auditor KPMG LLP, and service since 2011 (exact quote 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011' appears in the 10-K for accession 0001289419-25-000041). The candidate's quoted evidence matches the tool output and gold evidence. Minor point: the candidate cites the state as 'IL' in the filing rather than spelling out 'Illinois' in the quote, which is a harmless presentation choice. The auditor-tenure claim is directly supported. Slight deduction only for the candidate not explicitly citing the Item 8 section label, though the quote is correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002265585, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001325985, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009396, "wall_seconds": 22.836437264999404, "api_seconds": 21.512475186998927, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 29380, "completion_tokens": 1035, "reasoning_tokens": 124, "cache_read_tokens": 14836, "excerpt_characters": 3400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001289419-25-000073", "0001289419-25-000080", "0001289419-25-000082", "0001289419-25-000084", "0001289419-25-000086", "0001289419-25-000088", "0001289419-25-000090", "0001289419-25-000094", "0001289419-25-000100", "0001289419-25-000102", "0001289419-25-000104", "0001289419-25-000108", "0001289419-25-000113", "0001289419-25-000116", "0001289419-25-000118", "0001289419-25-000120", "0001289419-25-000122", "0001289419-25-000129", "0001289419-25-000132", "0001921094-25-000506" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/04ed1d495d01acb4c848bd4b.json", "detail_js": "details/04ed1d495d01acb4c848bd4b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/04ed1d495d01acb4c848bd4b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bac536e48af1479788f9f69acf7d117e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/84c0a05a24754cda8170b0e4c18b060c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0b9869d7fe2f30c6923d80df", "question_id": "Q018", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In what state is Morningstar, Inc. incorporated, and who serves as its independent auditor and since what year?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in Illinois, and its independent auditor is KPMG LLP, which has served as auditor since 2011.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Morningstar, Inc. is incorporated in **Illinois**. Its independent auditor is **KPMG**, whose appointment was ratified for 2025. The available filing identifies the auditor for that year but does **not** establish since what year KPMG has served, so I can’t verify the start year from these sources.\n\n**Evidence:** Morningstar’s May 2025 Form 8-K states “Illinois” as the state of incorporation and says KPMG was appointed as its independent registered public accounting firm for 2025. Filing `0001289419-25-000090`, `sfd-v1-2025-05.parquet`; the auditor passage begins at character offset 8039.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly gives Illinois as the state of incorporation and KPMG as the auditor, and both claims are supported by the 8-K excerpt it cites (state of incorporation IL/Illinois, and KPMG ratified for 2025 at offset 8039). However, the reference's key element is that KPMG has served since 2011, and the gold evidence (Item 8 of accession 0001289419-25-000041) is answerable. The candidate never opened that 10-K passage, even though the accession appeared in its own search results, so it wrongly abstained on the start year. Missing evidence does not excuse this, so the answer is only partly correct. Citation support is high for what it claims, but it cites an 8-K rather than the 10-K Item 8 passage and does not support the 2011 start year, so the abstention is an incomplete answer rather than a fabrication.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00291395, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00154815, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013658, "wall_seconds": 29.274373029000344, "api_seconds": 27.490226334997715, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41136, "completion_tokens": 1473, "reasoning_tokens": 480, "cache_read_tokens": 23475, "excerpt_characters": 5756, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012209", "0001104659-25-027796", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000003", "0001289419-25-000005", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000009", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000015", "0001289419-25-000017", "0001289419-25-000019", "0001289419-25-000022", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000027", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000043", "0001289419-25-000053", "0001289419-25-000058", "0001289419-25-000073", "0001289419-25-000080", "0001289419-25-000082", "0001289419-25-000084", "0001289419-25-000086", "0001289419-25-000088", "0001289419-25-000090", "0001289419-25-000094", "0001289419-25-000100", "0001289419-25-000102", "0001289419-25-000104", "0001289419-25-000108", "0001289419-25-000113", "0001289419-25-000116", "0001289419-25-000118", "0001289419-25-000120", "0001289419-25-000122", "0001289419-25-000129", "0001289419-25-000132", "0001921094-25-000092", "0001921094-25-000506" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/0b9869d7fe2f30c6923d80df.json", "detail_js": "details/0b9869d7fe2f30c6923d80df.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0b9869d7fe2f30c6923d80df.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6b1b01db314543b1b82323f63ae4f064.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/536d137b09a749969adbb862bc132d7e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2034c44356d1394cedac7bd5", "question_id": "Q019", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "Deloitte & Touche LLP is C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 2002.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0001043277-25-000012`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Deloitte & Touche LLP** (Minneapolis, Minnesota)\n* **Year Serving Since:** **2002**\n\n*(Source: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, stating: \"/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP ... We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.\")*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Deloitte & Touche LLP and 2002, matching the reference. The tool output shows the signature block '/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota' and the sentence 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.' The accession 0001043277-25-000012 and the 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are confirmed by the header output. The candidate's quote is an abridged version joined with an ellipsis, which is a faithful paraphrase of the tool text. The small deduction is that the cited quote merges two separate passages with an ellipsis rather than quoting one contiguous span.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02775095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02665275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010982, "wall_seconds": 29.49150896699939, "api_seconds": 27.758428332997937, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 39829, "completion_tokens": 1338, "reasoning_tokens": 272, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000008", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000019", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001043277-25-000025", "0001437749-25-003182", "0001437749-25-004586", "0001437749-25-015146" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/2034c44356d1394cedac7bd5.json", "detail_js": "details/2034c44356d1394cedac7bd5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2034c44356d1394cedac7bd5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1b0e6be108644784aad57412a583d2a7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d62b6543fb0044959bd94a5bae2eac30.request.json" }, { "task_id": "584cdcc8921d3dfd9fc2c9e8", "question_id": "Q019", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "Deloitte & Touche LLP is C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 2002.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem `0001043277-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 8 – *Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*):\n\n* **Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:** **Deloitte & Touche LLP** (Minneapolis, Minnesota)\n* **Serving Since:** **2002** (*\"We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.\"*)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate names Deloitte & Touche LLP and the year 2002, matching the reference. The tool output from read_filing contains both the signature block ('/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, February 14, 2025') and the sentence 'We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.' The accession 0001043277-25-000012, file ID sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and Item 8 section are all shown in the tool results. The fiscal year end of December 31, 2024 is supported by the audit opinion text. The candidate's claims are fully supported by the tool evidence, and the earlier failed query and empty searches do not affect the final answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02063645, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01948275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011537, "wall_seconds": 26.003790784001467, "api_seconds": 24.068096612001682, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32849, "completion_tokens": 933, "reasoning_tokens": 213, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000008", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001437749-25-003180", "0001437749-25-003182", "0001437749-25-003184", "0001437749-25-003186", "0001437749-25-003188", "0001437749-25-003190", "0001437749-25-004586", "0001437749-25-004589", "0001437749-25-004591", "0001437749-25-004593", "0001959173-25-001031", "0001959173-25-001070", "0001959173-25-001415" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/584cdcc8921d3dfd9fc2c9e8.json", "detail_js": "details/584cdcc8921d3dfd9fc2c9e8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/584cdcc8921d3dfd9fc2c9e8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/33f54d90ff9747889e5ecc7a0459d0fa.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/269c41e1b8de43c587a5409d43169c63.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7da220c3670ac1a126d25ed0", "question_id": "Q019", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Who serves as C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "Deloitte & Touche LLP is C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 2002.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Deloitte & Touche LLP was ratified as C.H. Robinson’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025. The returned filing evidence does not say since what year they have served, so I can’t establish that part. (File stem `0001043277-25-000025`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-05.parquet`.)", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly names Deloitte & Touche LLP as the auditor, and the 8-K excerpt (accession 0001043277-25-000025) supports its claim that Deloitte was ratified for fiscal 2025. It does not answer the second part, the year of service (2002 in the reference). The reference is answerable from the gold evidence, which the candidate's tool calls never retrieved, so abstaining on that part is an incomplete answer rather than a wrong one. The candidate was transparent about the gap. Citation support is high because every claim it makes is backed by the retrieved 8-K text and the cited file stem is accurate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00465476, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00307586, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015789, "wall_seconds": 35.53488216200094, "api_seconds": 33.95248927799912, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57685, "completion_tokens": 1549, "reasoning_tokens": 444, "cache_read_tokens": 25966, "excerpt_characters": 8400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000080661-25-000023", "0000080661-25-000025", "0000080661-25-000030", "0000080661-25-000032", "0001043277-25-000019", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001043277-25-000025", "0001127602-25-013938", "0001127602-25-013940", "0001127602-25-013942", "0001127602-25-013945", "0001127602-25-013950", "0001127602-25-013956", "0001127602-25-013964", "0001127602-25-013968", "0001127602-25-015384", "0001127602-25-015763", "0001127602-25-015875", "0001437749-25-010746", "0001437749-25-010748", "0001437749-25-010750", "0001437749-25-010753", "0001437749-25-010756", "0001437749-25-010759", "0001437749-25-010761", "0001437749-25-010764", "0001437749-25-010806", "0001437749-25-010839", "0001437749-25-015146", "0001437749-25-015147", "0001437749-25-016144", "0001437749-25-016146", "0001437749-25-016148", "0001437749-25-016149", "0001437749-25-016150", "0001437749-25-016151", "0001437749-25-016152", "0001437749-25-016153", "0001437749-25-016154", "0001437749-25-017445", "0001959173-25-003186", "0001959173-25-003449", "0001959173-25-003550", "0001959173-25-004207", "0001959173-25-004208", "0001959173-25-004218" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7da220c3670ac1a126d25ed0.json", "detail_js": "details/7da220c3670ac1a126d25ed0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7da220c3670ac1a126d25ed0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/650985c6f9dd4a349db4c238f01719af.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0b2554886e924e0e81c18a557be3f538.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ab7a817d5c655e65ef03e416", "question_id": "Q019", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Who serves as C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm, and since what year have they served?", "reference": "Deloitte & Touche LLP is C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s independent auditor, and they have served as auditor since 2002.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to identify C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm or the year it began serving. The queried filings did not contain the searched auditor wording.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (accession 0001043277-25-000012, Item 8) states Deloitte-style auditor tenure 'since 2002', so abstaining does not earn full correctness. The candidate's abstention is only partly supported by the tool outputs. The read_filing calls returned found=false, and the company-name search returned no rows. However, the searches were scoped to accession prefix 898173 and to files that never included the gold accession 0001043277-25-000012. The tool evidence therefore does not show that C.H. Robinson's own filings were searched, so 'insufficient evidence' overstates what was checked. The candidate also omits the auditor name and the year, which the evidence needed to answer the question was not shown to be absent. Citation support is moderate because the narrow claim that the queried filings lacked the wording is accurate, but the broader conclusion is not established by the retrieval actually performed.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00311939, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00197569, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011437, "wall_seconds": 28.667272370999854, "api_seconds": 27.020752506999997, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 40692, "completion_tokens": 1452, "reasoning_tokens": 487, "cache_read_tokens": 21624, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000898173-25-000005", "0000898173-25-000008", "0000898173-25-000010", "0000898173-25-000013", "0000898173-25-000017", "0000898173-25-000018", "0000898173-25-000020", "0000898173-25-000023", "0000898173-25-000026", "0000898173-25-000029", "0000898173-25-000033", "0001104659-25-030592", "0001104659-25-030639", "0001415889-25-008338", "0001415889-25-013807", "0001415889-25-013808", "0001415889-25-013809", "0001415889-25-013810", "0001415889-25-013811", "0001415889-25-013812", "0001415889-25-013813", "0001415889-25-015180", "0001415889-25-015181", "0001415889-25-015182", "0001959173-25-003312", "0001959173-25-003609", "0001959173-25-003635" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ab7a817d5c655e65ef03e416.json", "detail_js": "details/ab7a817d5c655e65ef03e416.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ab7a817d5c655e65ef03e416.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/63ae46df3e8644b089a5b612431f2fe9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a41dbdc3bf1040bbb8939a18513a4ad2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0", "question_id": "Q020", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Under what Item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025 under Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "On **January 7, 2025**, Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K under:\n\n* **Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure**\n\n*(The filing also included **Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits**, under which Exhibit 99.1—a press release dated January 7, 2025—and Exhibit 104 were furnished).*", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer, Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) plus Item 9.01, matches the reference and the gold quote for Item 7.01. Its supplementary details (Exhibit 99.1 press release, Exhibit 104) are not in the reference, so I did not penalize them for correctness, but they are unverified. Citation support is weak: the tool evidence only lists files and accession stems for CIK 829224 (including 0000829224-25-000006). Every attempt to read the filing text failed with memory errors, so no tool output shows Item 7.01, Item 9.01, or the exhibits. The item claims rest on the candidate's assertion, not on retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02307775, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02228175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.000796, "wall_seconds": 31.023262025000804, "api_seconds": 29.7805535269963, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31644, "completion_tokens": 1205, "reasoning_tokens": 300, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0.json", "detail_js": "details/ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ac147b05f8da93840204ecf0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1a976554d1424a26acba000e82da6ae5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/181f9dba27e44882bfd63b90619fedd2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "06d64acae366377e356bdfd6", "question_id": "Q020", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Under what Item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025 under Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the available evidence retrieved from the dataset:\n\n1. Filings for Starbucks Corporation (CIK `0000829224`) from January 2025 were identified in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` (including candidate filings `0000829224-25-000003` and `0000829224-25-000006`).\n2. However, due to memory allocation errors (`ArrowMemoryError` and DuckDB `OutOfMemoryException`) encountered when attempting to read the filing text and filter the `parsed_md` content, the contents of the Form 8-K could not be retrieved within the tool budget.\n\nTherefore, the evidence is insufficient to verify the exact Item number under which Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answers the question (Item 7.01 and Item 9.01). The candidate abstains, saying the Item number could not be verified because of memory errors. The question is answerable, so the abstention does not earn full correctness, and the candidate gives no Item number at all. Its factual statements are supported by the tool output: the accessions 0000829224-25-000003 and 0000829224-25-000006 and the sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet source appear in the results, and the read_filing and DuckDB calls did fail with the memory errors it describes. It never reached the 8-K text containing the Item 7.01 quote in the gold evidence, so its support covers only the retrieval process, not the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.024994425, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.024129825, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008646, "wall_seconds": 33.05518547400061, "api_seconds": 30.879063961998327, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 34504, "completion_tokens": 1454, "reasoning_tokens": 416, "cache_read_tokens": 1061, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/06d64acae366377e356bdfd6.json", "detail_js": "details/06d64acae366377e356bdfd6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/06d64acae366377e356bdfd6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/455c9b35a7e94e91a0d41702ae7e054e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e46e58f18a2743829bcf311a12f5ad3e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "097396cf0517ac065f727c97", "question_id": "Q020", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Under what Item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025 under Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the Item number from the available filing text: the scoped text queries failed with memory errors. The metadata lookup found several Starbucks filings from January 2025, but doesn’t identify which one was furnished on January 7 or what Item it reported.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: Item 7.01 (and 9.01) for the January 7, 2025 8-K, and the gold evidence quotes Item 7.01 for accession 0000829224-25-000006. The candidate abstained and gave no Item number, so it is incorrect on an answerable question, and abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable. Its account of the tool evidence is accurate: every content query (substring, strpos) failed with ArrowMemoryError, and the metadata lookup listed several Starbucks January 2025 accessions without dates or items. It also honestly disclosed the failure rather than guessing. The citation_support score is high because its claims match the tool outputs, though the tool evidence does not itself support the Item 7.01 answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001709335, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0009424349999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007669, "wall_seconds": 28.257183337000242, "api_seconds": 25.755838738996317, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 20093, "completion_tokens": 1234, "reasoning_tokens": 498, "cache_read_tokens": 11191, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/097396cf0517ac065f727c97.json", "detail_js": "details/097396cf0517ac065f727c97.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/097396cf0517ac065f727c97.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6a596eee5ffe400db6dca3c813be63f7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/361a10eaeb92487eb9b6982921b64afd.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ccdb290f9a83145cb5b16c82", "question_id": "Q020", "difficulty": "easy", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Under what Item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its Form 8-K on January 7, 2025 under Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the Item number from the filing text: attempts to read the January filing failed with a memory error. The metadata identifies Starbucks’ filing accession as **0000829224-25-000003**, but does not show the Item number.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answers Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and 9.01. The candidate abstains on the Item number, which is wrong because the question is answerable: gold evidence shows Item 7.01 in accession 0000829224-25-000006. The candidate's memory-error claim is supported by the tool outputs. However, it points to accession 0000829224-25-000003 as the relevant filing, which the tool evidence does not tie to a January 7 8-K. The search returned no 8-K rows, and the tool output lists 000006 as a candidate without examining it. The candidate therefore gives an unsupported identification and misses the correct filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001641905, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000871105, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007708, "wall_seconds": 21.295878079999966, "api_seconds": 19.95547863599859, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 23229, "completion_tokens": 1019, "reasoning_tokens": 389, "cache_read_tokens": 14223, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/ccdb290f9a83145cb5b16c82.json", "detail_js": "details/ccdb290f9a83145cb5b16c82.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ccdb290f9a83145cb5b16c82.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/34ac768e6f9d4719b75e0b4f4e9a1318.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ca2426e47c7448cb8e454647f0031d2b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d7f4fd96e557ecd3b5becac4", "question_id": "Q021", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Alphabet Inc.'s consolidated revenue growth rate, and what were the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Alphabet Inc.'s revenues were $350.0 billion (an increase of 14% year over year), driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion (12%) and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion (31%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected, Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 was located in file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` under filing accession/stem `0001652044-25-000014`. \n\nWhile the business overview and revenue breakdown descriptions defining **Google Services** and **Google Cloud** were located within the filing (Item 1 and Item 7 MD&A), the specific numerical tables showing the consolidated revenue growth rate and the exact dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues for fiscal year 2024 were not retrieved before the tool budget was exhausted. \n\nTherefore, the available evidence returned within the tool limit is insufficient to state the exact revenue numbers, growth rates, and dollar/percentage increases.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the filing (gold evidence in Item 7 gives $350.0B revenue, +14%; Google Services +$32.4B/12%; Google Cloud +$10.1B). The candidate abstained, stating the numbers were not retrieved within the tool budget. Abstention is not acceptable here because the reference is answerable, and the transcript shows a 'Total revenues' hit at position 176757 that was never read. The candidate therefore provides none of the required figures (revenue, growth rate, dollar and percentage increases). It gets partial credit for correctly identifying the filing accession 0001652044-25-000014 and the Item 1 segment descriptions. Citation support is fairly high because its claims match the tool outputs: the filing was located, the segment definitions were found, and no numbers were found. A small deduction applies because the claim that Item 7 was located is not directly shown by the tool outputs, and the fiscal year-end date is inferred rather than cited.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03318665, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03180675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013799, "wall_seconds": 41.06340116699903, "api_seconds": 38.74599998199665, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47518, "completion_tokens": 1738, "reasoning_tokens": 384, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d7f4fd96e557ecd3b5becac4.json", "detail_js": "details/d7f4fd96e557ecd3b5becac4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d7f4fd96e557ecd3b5becac4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ca2d281e914e4949a6fdab42b0770d11.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6ad5f7d4e6c540b1a276b460e6bd0a6b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8831b7c9ae582752318de3f0", "question_id": "Q021", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Alphabet Inc.'s consolidated revenue growth rate, and what were the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Alphabet Inc.'s revenues were $350.0 billion (an increase of 14% year over year), driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion (12%) and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion (31%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings retrieved within the allocated tool budget, Alphabet Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2024 was identified (`file_stem: 0001652044-25-000014` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). \n\nWhile the report confirms the segment structure (Google Services, Google Cloud, and Other Bets) and descriptions of revenue components (Item 1 and Item 7 MD&A introductory sections), the tool budget was exhausted before reading the specific numerical tables containing the fiscal year 2024 consolidated revenues, segment revenues for Google Services and Google Cloud, and their prior-year comparative figures.\n\nTherefore, the returned evidence is **insufficient** to provide the exact dollar amounts, dollar increases, and percentage growth rates for consolidated revenues, Google Services revenues, and Google Cloud revenues.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference asks for specific figures: consolidated revenue of $350.0B (+14%), Google Services +$32.4B (+12%), and Google Cloud +$10.1B (+31%). The candidate supplies none of these numbers and explicitly abstains, saying the tool budget ran out before reaching the numerical tables. The reference is answerable from the filing (the gold quote sits in the 10-K Item 7 MD&A), so abstention does not earn credit; the candidate's answer is essentially wrong/incomplete, with only a trivially correct identification of the accession number (0001652044-25-000014) and segment structure. Citation support is high because the tool outputs it cites (accession, file, segment structure from Item 1) are genuinely present in the retrieved evidence, and the candidate honestly reports what it did not find.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04349905, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.041757749999999996, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017413, "wall_seconds": 31.870819271000073, "api_seconds": 29.09095386700028, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 67540, "completion_tokens": 1110, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8831b7c9ae582752318de3f0.json", "detail_js": "details/8831b7c9ae582752318de3f0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8831b7c9ae582752318de3f0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8ae389523bbd4de38fafec1ee68a275c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/190be09fe5dc4db58a0eb14d40362aa6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f1e078cc136a06b33df43f96", "question_id": "Q021", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Alphabet Inc.'s consolidated revenue growth rate, and what were the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Alphabet Inc.'s revenues were $350.0 billion (an increase of 14% year over year), driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion (12%) and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion (31%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is not sufficient to calculate the consolidated revenue growth rate or the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud. It does state that Google Cloud revenue increased **$10.1 billion** from 2023 to 2024, but gives no corresponding percentage in the retrieved passage.\n\nSource: Alphabet Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, file stem **0001652044-25-000014**, file **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**; retrieved passage around character offset **178,700**.", "correctness": 22, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives four facts: consolidated revenue of $350.0B up 14%, Google Services up $32.4B (12%), and Google Cloud up $10.1B (31%). The candidate correctly reports the Google Cloud dollar increase of $10.1B and correctly identifies the filing (accession 0001652044-25-000014). That fact is supported by the tool output at offset 178700. However, the candidate abstains on most of the question. It does not report the 14% consolidated growth or the Google Services figures, and it omits the Cloud percentage. Its claim that the evidence is insufficient is not fully supported: the tool results show 'consolidated revenues' at offset 78020, 'google services revenues' at offset 159784, and 'revenue growth' at offset 64366, but the candidate never read those passages. Abstention is not warranted because the reference is answerable from the filing. Citation support is fair for the one figure it states and the source it cites, but it does not support the blanket insufficiency claim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004446055, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002772655, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016734, "wall_seconds": 39.112607721999666, "api_seconds": 36.60056530700058, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58296, "completion_tokens": 1535, "reasoning_tokens": 450, "cache_read_tokens": 28453, "excerpt_characters": 13300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f1e078cc136a06b33df43f96.json", "detail_js": "details/f1e078cc136a06b33df43f96.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f1e078cc136a06b33df43f96.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/348e63a62ca14279b5735c4175cecbfb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c60b7f76f52c4644a159a3c51ea6a09d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5ad971da918c13218c4f6856", "question_id": "Q021", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Alphabet Inc.'s consolidated revenue growth rate, and what were the dollar and percentage increases for Google Services and Google Cloud revenues?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Alphabet Inc.'s revenues were $350.0 billion (an increase of 14% year over year), driven by an increase in Google Services revenues of $32.4 billion (12%) and an increase in Google Cloud revenues of $10.1 billion (31%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The available filing evidence is insufficient to calculate the requested figures. It verifies that the filing is Alphabet Inc.’s FY2024 Form 10-K, but the returned passage contains no FY2024 or FY2023 revenue amounts or growth rates for consolidated revenue, Google Services, or Google Cloud. I therefore can’t give the requested rates or increases from the evidence available.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence states revenues of $350.0B (up 14%), Google Services up $32.4B (12%), and Google Cloud up $10.1B (31%). The candidate abstained and provided none of these figures, so it fails completeness on every requested item. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. The candidate's description of the tool evidence is accurate: the FY2024 10-K identification matches the retrieved header (period 20241231, form 10-K), and the retrieved passage contains only definitional text with no revenue amounts or growth rates. The failure is retrieval, not a misstatement, so citation_support is high while correctness stays low.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003803, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0021977, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016053, "wall_seconds": 31.33354184699965, "api_seconds": 29.180914991002282, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48179, "completion_tokens": 1172, "reasoning_tokens": 368, "cache_read_tokens": 21390, "excerpt_characters": 13200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-021536", "0000950170-25-021555", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022825", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-023879", "0000950170-25-025147", "0000950170-25-028107", "0000950170-25-028131", "0000950170-25-029764", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000016", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001950047-25-000578", "0001950047-25-000967", "0001950047-25-000975", "0001950047-25-001130", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5ad971da918c13218c4f6856.json", "detail_js": "details/5ad971da918c13218c4f6856.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5ad971da918c13218c4f6856.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b4d06152fa1a41ab807cae15f9c5ddfd.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fd9dc0eff6254a6bbc61c1ff810d6c95.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1afa30d89cf46ba536359ac4", "question_id": "Q022", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was the breakdown of Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales between net product sales and net service sales?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Amazon.com, Inc. reported net product sales of $272,311 million ($272.3 billion) and net service sales of $365,648 million ($365.6 billion), totaling $637,959 million ($638.0 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in its 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the breakdown of total net sales for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:\n\n* **Net product sales:** $272,311 million (42.69%)\n* **Net service sales:** $365,648 million (57.31%)\n* **Total net sales:** $637,959 million (100.00%)", "correctness": 85, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's dollar figures match the reference and the tool evidence exactly: net product sales $272,311M, net service sales $365,648M, total $637,959M, for the year ended December 31, 2024, from accession 0001018724-25-000004. The unrequested percentage splits are slightly off. 272,311/637,959 is about 42.68%, not 42.69%, and the service share is 57.32%, not 57.31%. The percentages are derived rather than quoted, so the tool evidence does not directly support them. The source citation (accession, file ID, statement name) is well supported by the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0147673, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.013863, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009043, "wall_seconds": 21.437475098000505, "api_seconds": 19.924466366999695, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 21777, "completion_tokens": 1150, "reasoning_tokens": 452, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/1afa30d89cf46ba536359ac4.json", "detail_js": "details/1afa30d89cf46ba536359ac4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1afa30d89cf46ba536359ac4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bf8ba0e9c15a4d829a9a97d16390a33b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/11d160f4f5d84c76af229a17618e1b8d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1fa7f20b8a92efbc0ab1330a", "question_id": "Q022", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was the breakdown of Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales between net product sales and net service sales?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Amazon.com, Inc. reported net product sales of $272,311 million ($272.3 billion) and net service sales of $365,648 million ($365.6 billion), totaling $637,959 million ($638.0 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s Consolidated Statements of Operations in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, character offset: ~165800–177800), the breakdown of total net sales for fiscal year 2024 is as follows:\n\n- **Net product sales:** $272,311 million (42.68%)\n- **Net service sales:** $365,648 million (57.32%)\n- **Total net sales:** $637,959 million (100.00%)\n\n*(Note: $272,311 million + $365,648 million = $637,959 million)*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 94, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: net product sales $272,311M, net service sales $365,648M, and total $637,959M. The percentage split (42.68% / 57.32%) is arithmetically correct, and the components sum to the total. The added percentages go beyond the reference but do not conflict with it. The cited statement appears in the read_filing output at offset 165800, which contains the Consolidated Statements of Operations with these exact values under the 2024 column, and the 'Annual Report on Form 10-K' wording and 'Year Ended December 31, 2024' header support the cited filing context. The minor deduction is that the tool outputs never explicitly show the form type or the file_id/offset metadata as a single record, so some of the citation metadata is inferred rather than directly displayed.", "known_cost_usd": 0.06246515, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05979825, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026669, "wall_seconds": 42.80137376200037, "api_seconds": 38.512924244001624, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 98925, "completion_tokens": 1495, "reasoning_tokens": 415, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1fa7f20b8a92efbc0ab1330a.json", "detail_js": "details/1fa7f20b8a92efbc0ab1330a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1fa7f20b8a92efbc0ab1330a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/efc96a1d456a473bbb2122bac2a6bc28.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2380539271f04f2991a94de2216c21bd.request.json" }, { "task_id": "cb0ad69787d7866b57ac803d", "question_id": "Q022", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was the breakdown of Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales between net product sales and net service sales?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Amazon.com, Inc. reported net product sales of $272,311 million ($272.3 billion) and net service sales of $365,648 million ($365.6 billion), totaling $637,959 million ($638.0 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s fiscal year 2024 total net sales were **$637.959 billion**, comprising:\n\n- **Net product sales:** $272.311 billion\n- **Net service sales:** $365.648 billion\n\nThe amounts reconcile: $272.311 billion + $365.648 billion = $637.959 billion. These figures are from the 2024 column of Amazon’s consolidated statements of operations (in millions). Source: filing `0001018724-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; SQL evidence retrieved the passage containing the table.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the gold evidence: net product sales $272,311M ($272.311B), net service sales $365,648M ($365.648B), and total net sales $637,959M ($637.959B). The arithmetic reconciles (272,311 + 365,648 = 637,959), and the millions-to-billions conversion is correct. The tool output shows the consolidated statements of operations table with the 2024 column matching these values, and the cited accession 0001018724-25-000004 is the source. Minor deduction only because the candidate's explanation of the retrieval path is slightly more detailed than the tool output directly confirms, though the table values themselves are fully supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0018603250000000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000948925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009114, "wall_seconds": 18.01184523899974, "api_seconds": 17.18120800199904, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 18346, "completion_tokens": 909, "reasoning_tokens": 287, "cache_read_tokens": 6120, "excerpt_characters": 1600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/cb0ad69787d7866b57ac803d.json", "detail_js": "details/cb0ad69787d7866b57ac803d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/cb0ad69787d7866b57ac803d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/889253058c5e4a13802c0a4c12fa15ae.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0cebcee0eec4492ca3dd764c697847c0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0ca7f0e527bdf3f68d762e02", "question_id": "Q022", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was the breakdown of Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales between net product sales and net service sales?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Amazon.com, Inc. reported net product sales of $272,311 million ($272.3 billion) and net service sales of $365,648 million ($365.6 billion), totaling $637,959 million ($638.0 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For fiscal 2024, Amazon reported **$272.311 billion in net product sales** and **$365.648 billion in net service sales**, totaling **$637.959 billion in net sales**. That’s about **42.7% product sales** and **57.3% service sales**.\n\nSource: Amazon.com, Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, consolidated statements of operations, in millions (filing `0001018724-25-000004`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at characters 165,165–177,165).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and gold evidence: net product sales $272,311M ($272.311B), net service sales $365,648M ($365.648B), and total net sales $637,959M ($637.959B). The unit conversion from millions to billions is correct, and the percentages check out (272,311/637,959 ≈ 42.7%; 365,648/637,959 ≈ 57.3%). The cited filing (0001018724-25-000004) and the character range 165,165–177,165 match the read_filing output, which contains the Consolidated Statements of Operations with these exact values. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not restate the figures in millions as the reference does, but it does state the source units.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004366475, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002186975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021795, "wall_seconds": 27.046522882001227, "api_seconds": 25.086496081001314, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 51343, "completion_tokens": 1069, "reasoning_tokens": 352, "cache_read_tokens": 18110, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001238", "0001959173-25-001264" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/0ca7f0e527bdf3f68d762e02.json", "detail_js": "details/0ca7f0e527bdf3f68d762e02.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0ca7f0e527bdf3f68d762e02.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b5cc5b4ee2484c2ca1610e843b8f6ca8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e2d2b6b513544fdb9102aca4d4fa90b7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5e3e3a62e16c4965ca5bf3a9", "question_id": "Q023", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, what were NVIDIA Corporation's operating expenses for Research and development and Sales, general and administrative?", "reference": "For fiscal year 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported Research and development expense of $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and Sales, general and administrative expense of $3,491 million ($3.491 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 7 – Operating Expenses):\n\nFor the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, operating expenses were:\n- **Research and development:** **$12,914 million** (or **$12.914 billion**)\n- **Sales, general and administrative:** **$3,491 million** (or **$3.491 billion**)\n\n*(Total operating expenses for the year were $16,405 million).*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence: R&D of $12,914 million and SG&A of $3,491 million for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025. The $16,405 million total also matches the tool output. The units and the $billion conversions are correct. The accession 0001045810-25-000023 and file_stem are supported by the duckdb query results. The 'Item 7 – Operating Expenses' label fits the MD&A Operating Expenses table shown in the tool output, though the gold evidence cites Item 8. The citation score is slightly reduced because the candidate does not quote the table it relies on and the section label differs from the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03997965, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03865575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013239, "wall_seconds": 40.00567728999886, "api_seconds": 36.49949627899878, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57520, "completion_tokens": 1452, "reasoning_tokens": 224, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000033", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000039", "0001045810-25-000065", "0001045810-25-000069" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5e3e3a62e16c4965ca5bf3a9.json", "detail_js": "details/5e3e3a62e16c4965ca5bf3a9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5e3e3a62e16c4965ca5bf3a9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/eeab2e584c524585852c046e00f32dd1.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fd05dd9687e64802b07063d0d71885e8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a07f396d67147daf22f03ecc", "question_id": "Q023", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, what were NVIDIA Corporation's operating expenses for Research and development and Sales, general and administrative?", "reference": "For fiscal year 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported Research and development expense of $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and Sales, general and administrative expense of $3,491 million ($3.491 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Consolidated Statements of Income, Item 8 / Part IV):\n\n* **Research and development:** **$12,914 million** ($12.914 billion)\n* **Sales, general and administrative:** **$3,491 million** ($3.491 billion)\n\nTotal operating expenses for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 were **$16,405 million** ($12,914 million + $3,491 million).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives Research and development as $12,914 million and Sales, general and administrative as $3,491 million, matching the reference and the gold evidence. The units (millions and billions) and the fiscal year end date of January 26, 2025 are correct. Its added total of $16,405 million is consistent with the income statement in the tool output and with 12,914 + 3,491. The accession number and file ID are supported by the tool results, and the Consolidated Statements of Income rows appear in the read_filing output. The Item 8 / Part IV label is a minor, loosely supported detail, so citation support is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04021775, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03781725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024005, "wall_seconds": 32.36857476299883, "api_seconds": 31.11710412100001, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 68583, "completion_tokens": 1169, "reasoning_tokens": 261, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/a07f396d67147daf22f03ecc.json", "detail_js": "details/a07f396d67147daf22f03ecc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a07f396d67147daf22f03ecc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d6ed3615521b4fa8ab9b3ad2f4652a23.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/17edcf1eb34d45ce9bae2b4e1d27e1ef.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9c900ddac796aa19d47457c2", "question_id": "Q023", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, what were NVIDIA Corporation's operating expenses for Research and development and Sales, general and administrative?", "reference": "For fiscal year 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported Research and development expense of $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and Sales, general and administrative expense of $3,491 million ($3.491 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The filing’s percentage-of-revenue table reports Research and development at **9.9%** and Sales, general and administrative at **2.7%** for the year ended January 26, 2025. It does not give the dollar amounts in the returned evidence, so I can’t determine those amounts from the available results.\n\nSource: NVIDIA filing, `file_stem` **0001045810-25-000023**, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; returned excerpt around “Consolidated Statements of Income.”", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The question asks for dollar amounts (R&D $12,914M and SG&A $3,491M per the reference). The candidate gives only the percentage-of-revenue figures (9.9% and 2.7%), which the tool output does support, and then abstains on the dollar amounts. The reference shows those amounts are answerable from the filing's income statement, so the abstention is not justified. The candidate's search did not reach the Consolidated Statements of Income table, and the answer does not provide the requested values. Citation support is high because the percentages, the accession number, and the claim that the returned excerpt lacks dollar figures all match the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003666655, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002382155, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012845, "wall_seconds": 30.210078275000342, "api_seconds": 27.40514342199822, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48603, "completion_tokens": 1395, "reasoning_tokens": 364, "cache_read_tokens": 24708, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9c900ddac796aa19d47457c2.json", "detail_js": "details/9c900ddac796aa19d47457c2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9c900ddac796aa19d47457c2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8cf14895a8da448a92299ac47495bedf.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ee7b27fd41894b50b47515fbd8b773a4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "021343b24ed52598adf63a99", "question_id": "Q023", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, what were NVIDIA Corporation's operating expenses for Research and development and Sales, general and administrative?", "reference": "For fiscal year 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported Research and development expense of $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and Sales, general and administrative expense of $3,491 million ($3.491 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For NVIDIA’s fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, operating expenses were:\n\n- **Research and development:** **$12.914 billion**\n- **Sales, general and administrative:** **$3.491 billion**\n\nBoth figures are in millions in the filing: $12,914 million and $3,491 million. Source: Form 10-K, file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, filing text offsets 222,819–234,819.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference: R&D $12,914 million ($12.914 billion) and SG&A $3,491 million ($3.491 billion), with correct units and the correct fiscal year end (January 26, 2025). The cited accession 0001045810-25-000023, file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and offsets 222,819–234,819 all come from the read_filing output, and that span contains the Operating Expenses table with 12914 and 3491 under '($ in millions)'. The source is the MD&A operating expenses table within that offset range, not Item 8 as the gold evidence labels it, but the candidate does not name a section, so this is a minor point. The small deduction reflects that the cited span is the MD&A table rather than the income statement the gold evidence references.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0034200999999999997, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0016726, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017475, "wall_seconds": 21.087409960000514, "api_seconds": 20.34927105099814, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40300, "completion_tokens": 1071, "reasoning_tokens": 354, "cache_read_tokens": 15425, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/021343b24ed52598adf63a99.json", "detail_js": "details/021343b24ed52598adf63a99.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/021343b24ed52598adf63a99.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e8c95a9e94144fe9bde8985b0cc4139.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/caecc02ad37a4fb9ac5e95f94a57268e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "eba9e55e15eefdc9ea399d70", "question_id": "Q024", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Intel Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024, and by what dollar amount and percentage did it decrease compared to 2023?", "reference": "Intel Corporation's 2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings located (specifically Intel Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024, accession number/file stem `0000050863-25-000009` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), the tool budget was exhausted before reading the specific revenue figures from the Consolidated Statements of Operations or Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis.\n\nConsequently, there is **insufficient evidence** within the retrieved tool output to state Intel Corporation's total revenue for fiscal year 2024 and calculate the dollar and percentage decrease compared to 2023.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence states 2024 revenue was $53.1B, down $1.1B or 2% from 2023. The candidate abstains and gives none of these figures, so it is incomplete and does not answer the question. Its abstention is not a valid excuse because the filing was located and the gold quote exists in the same 10-K. Citation support is moderate. The tool output does support the accession number 0000050863-25-000009, the 10-K form type, and the December 28, 2024 fiscal year end. However, the claim that the 'tool budget was exhausted' has no supporting message in the tool evidence. The tool evidence also shows the search reached the income statement and 'Revenue' strings without reading the figures, which is consistent with the candidate's statement that the numbers were not retrieved.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04011975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03878475, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001335, "wall_seconds": 35.207081955999456, "api_seconds": 33.50480835000235, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56838, "completion_tokens": 1645, "reasoning_tokens": 379, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000074", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094", "0001127602-25-013180", "0001127602-25-013723", "0001127602-25-013738", "0001127602-25-013739", "0001127602-25-016494", "0001127602-25-016503", "0001127602-25-016513", "0001127602-25-016515" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/eba9e55e15eefdc9ea399d70.json", "detail_js": "details/eba9e55e15eefdc9ea399d70.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/eba9e55e15eefdc9ea399d70.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1ca048a9705b48bd914a0aa0871e88f8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ca51b1f21ea44bb9c7d5dcfa8866a4e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb", "question_id": "Q024", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Intel Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024, and by what dollar amount and percentage did it decrease compared to 2023?", "reference": "Intel Corporation's 2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023.", "status": "error", "error": "Model requested tools during forced finalization", "answer": null, "correctness": null, "citation_support": null, "judge_model": null, "judge_provider": null, "judge_rationale": null, "known_cost_usd": 0.0352275, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0352275, "judge_known_cost_usd": null, "wall_seconds": 25.78858434200083, "api_seconds": 24.38450435300183, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 9, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 43030, "completion_tokens": 788, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "case_failed", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb.json", "detail_js": "details/5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5995e97dbf4293a612ab56eb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8c37a53bacbd46e8802bea3b7633fd6f.request.json", "judge_request_file": null }, { "task_id": "6abf6e432f1d6a0bd9f6ed81", "question_id": "Q024", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Intel Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024, and by what dollar amount and percentage did it decrease compared to 2023?", "reference": "Intel Corporation's 2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel reported **total net revenue of $53.1 billion** for fiscal year 2024, compared with **$54.2 billion** in 2023. That was a decrease of **$1.1 billion**, or about **2.0%** ($1.1B ÷ $54.2B).\n\nEvidence: Intel’s FY2024 results table gives total net revenue of $53.1 billion and says it was down 2% year over year (filing `0000050863-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, SQL text evidence at character offset 12,476). The 2023 amount of $54.2 billion is implied by the reported amount and rounded decrease; the percentage is approximate.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 82, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all key facts: FY2024 revenue of $53.1B, a $1.1B decrease, and roughly 2%. The implied 2023 figure of $54.2B is arithmetically consistent (53.1 + 1.1), and the candidate labels it as implied. The percentage calculation (1.1/54.2 ≈ 2.0%) is correct. The tool output shows the results table with 'Total net revenue | $53.1 billion | down | 2%' in filing 0000050863-25-000004 at offset 12,476, which supports the revenue and the 2% decline. However, the tool output does not show the $1.1B dollar decrease directly, and the candidate cites a different accession than the gold evidence (0000050863-25-000009). The cited accession is supported by the tool evidence, but the gold quote's MD&A sentence was not retrieved, so the citation is only partially verified for the dollar decrease.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002123945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001021645, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011023, "wall_seconds": 19.241000456999245, "api_seconds": 18.705236290001267, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 22308, "completion_tokens": 1335, "reasoning_tokens": 523, "cache_read_tokens": 9962, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/6abf6e432f1d6a0bd9f6ed81.json", "detail_js": "details/6abf6e432f1d6a0bd9f6ed81.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6abf6e432f1d6a0bd9f6ed81.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/540423b4c1db4929a01c6d08d33e1b66.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/59214fdd968e4c7dbb2f9841bba6f77b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "96cd9ba347dc77830d93c1ae", "question_id": "Q024", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Intel Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024, and by what dollar amount and percentage did it decrease compared to 2023?", "reference": "Intel Corporation's 2024 revenue was $53.1 billion, down $1.1 billion, or 2%, from 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel reported **$53.1 billion in total revenue for fiscal 2024**, down **$1.1 billion**, or **2%**, compared with 2023. The dollar decrease and percentage are as stated in Intel’s filing. **Source:** Intel 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, characters 72,619–84,619.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence: 2024 revenue of $53.1 billion, a $1.1 billion decrease, and a 2% decline from 2023. The stated dates and units are correct, and the decrease is internally consistent (about 2% of roughly $54.2 billion). The cited accession 0000050863-25-000009 and character range 72,619–84,619 match the read_filing output, and that output contains the 'A Year in Review' sentence with these exact figures. Minor deduction only for the candidate not quoting the sentence directly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0045528949999999995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002346995, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022059, "wall_seconds": 29.384547998000926, "api_seconds": 28.770145225000306, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 67448, "completion_tokens": 1029, "reasoning_tokens": 368, "cache_read_tokens": 33807, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/96cd9ba347dc77830d93c1ae.json", "detail_js": "details/96cd9ba347dc77830d93c1ae.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/96cd9ba347dc77830d93c1ae.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a9c0cf01ef4e4b3a9cc72c555a9489e3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bfd7320f52c84fbdb7916dd1a84e3ae1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1bc7a6455cd16e9f0fe562b0", "question_id": "Q025", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue, and what was its year-over-year percentage growth from fiscal 2023?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Item 7 – *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Segment Information*):\n\n### **Digital Media Segment Revenue**\n* **Fiscal Year 2024:** **$15,864 million** (or **$15.86 billion**)\n* **Fiscal Year 2023:** **$14,216 million** (or **$14.22 billion**)\n\n---\n\n### **Year-over-Year Percentage Growth**\n* Reported in the filing: **12%**\n* Exact calculation:\n $$\\frac{15,864 - 14,216}{14,216} = \\frac{1,648}{14,216} \\approx 11.593\\% \\rightarrow 12\\%$$\n *(or using the billions figure: $\\frac{15.86 - 14.22}{14.22} \\approx 11.53\\% \\rightarrow 12\\%$)*", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence. Digital Media revenue was $15,864M in FY2024 and $14,216M in FY2023, which equal $15.86B and $14.22B, and the filing reports 12% growth. The fiscal year-end date (November 29, 2024) and accession number are correct. Its recomputed growth (1,648/14,216 ≈ 11.59%, or 11.53% from the billions figures) correctly rounds to 12%. The only minor discrepancy is the section label: the candidate cites 'Segment Information', while the gold cites 'Overview'. The tool output contains the segment table and the overview sentence, so the cited values are well supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03776855, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03636225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014063, "wall_seconds": 69.63013382200006, "api_seconds": 67.62013354499868, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 55156, "completion_tokens": 1478, "reasoning_tokens": 346, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/1bc7a6455cd16e9f0fe562b0.json", "detail_js": "details/1bc7a6455cd16e9f0fe562b0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1bc7a6455cd16e9f0fe562b0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7b7fde701a78491bb54c428bcbf167f3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6a13ba17329042ee8e1101d0556980cc.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2abfbd2e6e3eb638382fb4db", "question_id": "Q025", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue, and what was its year-over-year percentage growth from fiscal 2023?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024; file stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Part II, Item 7 \"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Segments\"):\n\n### **1. Total Digital Media Segment Revenue**\n* **Fiscal 2024:** **$15,864 million** (or **$15.86 billion**)\n* **Fiscal 2023:** **$14,216 million** (or **$14.22 billion**)\n\n---\n\n### **2. Year-over-Year Percentage Growth**\n* **Reported in filing:** **12%**\n* **Exact calculation:**\n $$\\frac{15,864 - 14,216}{14,216} = \\frac{1,648}{14,216} \\approx 11.593\\% \\approx 11.6\\% \\text{ (or } 12\\% \\text{ rounded to the nearest whole percentage)}$$", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 93, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all key facts: Digital Media segment revenue of $15.86B (listed as $15,864M) for fiscal 2024, $14.22B (listed as $14,216M) for fiscal 2023, and 12% year-over-year growth. The tool output contains the exact sentence from the MD&A and the Segment Information table showing $15,864 / $14,216 / 12%, so the figures are well supported. The candidate's own calculation (11.59%, about 11.6%, rounding to 12%) is arithmetically correct and reconciles with the reported 12%. The fiscal year-end date of November 29, 2024 appears in the filing text. Minor deductions: the candidate labels the section 'Segments' rather than the gold 'Overview', and it asserts 'Part II, Item 7' without a direct heading in the retrieved text, though the surrounding evidence supports that location.", "known_cost_usd": 0.032991150000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03117075, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018204, "wall_seconds": 65.550073978, "api_seconds": 64.75017398400087, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 52255, "completion_tokens": 1502, "reasoning_tokens": 451, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/2abfbd2e6e3eb638382fb4db.json", "detail_js": "details/2abfbd2e6e3eb638382fb4db.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2abfbd2e6e3eb638382fb4db.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3ae9c17fdbf049fa9b0ad7c22c7fd2d2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4ffd7ed207434df09e0570338d025ea4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6f153e48d6d7c34e76e73ef8", "question_id": "Q025", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue, and what was its year-over-year percentage growth from fiscal 2023?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe’s total Digital Media revenue in fiscal 2024 was **$15.864 billion**. Fiscal 2023 revenue was **$14.216 billion**, so the year-over-year growth was **about 11.6%**: \\((15{,}864-14{,}216) \\div 14{,}216 \\times 100\\). The filing reports this as **12%** rounded.\n\n**Source:** Adobe’s FY2024 filing, file stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, revenue table excerpt at character offset 214,500.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the tool-retrieved table: Total Digital Media revenue of $15,864M (FY2024) and $14,216M (FY2023), with the filing's reported 12% change. Its arithmetic is correct: (15,864 - 14,216) / 14,216 = 11.6%, which it reports alongside the filing's rounded 12%. The reference's $15.86B and $14.22B are rounded forms of the same values, and its 12% matches the filing. The candidate loses a few points for not stating the 12% headline growth as the primary answer, though it does mention it. Citation support is strong: the FY2024 filing (0000796343-25-000004) and the Digital Media table at offset 214,500 appear in the tool output. The exact gold quote sentence does not appear in the tool output, but the table it summarizes does.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002539695, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001365895, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011738, "wall_seconds": 62.469375759001196, "api_seconds": 60.60109567099971, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32336, "completion_tokens": 1522, "reasoning_tokens": 572, "cache_read_tokens": 17787, "excerpt_characters": 4700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/6f153e48d6d7c34e76e73ef8.json", "detail_js": "details/6f153e48d6d7c34e76e73ef8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6f153e48d6d7c34e76e73ef8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/21be81b727a442cba168f67dcd5d3b41.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/99d2dc1e18b54c4091b09ace71bd5769.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9af36a1d0a372cbf85715e3d", "question_id": "Q025", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue, and what was its year-over-year percentage growth from fiscal 2023?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total Digital Media segment revenue grew to $15.86 billion in fiscal 2024, up from $14.22 billion in fiscal 2023, representing 12% year-over-year growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t verify Adobe’s fiscal 2024 Digital Media revenue or its year-over-year growth from the returned evidence. The metadata query returned no matching filing, and the searches were incomplete; no filing passages or figures were retrieved.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the gold evidence ($15.86B Digital Media revenue in FY2024, up from $14.22B, 12% growth), so a non-answer cannot earn full correctness. The candidate gives no figures and no growth rate, so it misses every required element; it is not wrong, only incomplete, which justifies a low score. Its claims about the tool output are supported: the DuckDB query returned no rows, the per-file searches returned zero rows with complete=false after 500 scanned rows, the sixth search hit the tool budget, and the first query had a binder error. Because the candidate asserts nothing beyond what the tool evidence shows, citation_support is high. The tool evidence never surfaces the gold passage, so the failure is in retrieval, not in the candidate's reporting.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00216792, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00132692, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.000841, "wall_seconds": 53.454868972999975, "api_seconds": 53.16615333700065, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 9, "tool_processed": 9, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 6, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 1, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 17706, "completion_tokens": 1352, "reasoning_tokens": 425, "cache_read_tokens": 4932, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9af36a1d0a372cbf85715e3d.json", "detail_js": "details/9af36a1d0a372cbf85715e3d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9af36a1d0a372cbf85715e3d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/344acb1c11b84d83b22f6c0672805a1d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8c0f31f874cf4ab08641986ad1cd4a03.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ba230f6cbb20547a88404b3a", "question_id": "Q026", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2024, and what percentage of net revenues did they represent?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,246.2 million in fiscal year 2024, representing 51.1% of net revenues (up 6.4% from $3,051.9 million in 2023).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the available evidence retrieved from the dataset within the tool budget, Levi Strauss & Co.'s relevant annual filing (Form 10-K) for fiscal year 2024 was not successfully located or accessed. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to state Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses and the percentage of net revenues they represented for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives SG&A of 3246.2 (FY2024), 3051.9 (FY2023), and 51.1% of net revenues. The candidate abstains, and abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, so it fails the task. It asserts no wrong figures, which keeps the score above zero. Its citation support is moderate-to-good: the tool outputs do show the Levi Strauss search hit an out-of-memory error and that the accession and file-stem lookups returned no Levi 10-K rows, so the claim that the filing was not located is consistent with the tool evidence. The shown evidence never contains the gold quote, and the candidate did not try the read_filing route the tool notes suggested.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0289111, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0279765, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009346, "wall_seconds": 33.78733737699986, "api_seconds": 32.30210488699959, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 38358, "completion_tokens": 1658, "reasoning_tokens": 305, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000940394-25-000250", "0001193125-25-038779", "0001752724-25-027068" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ba230f6cbb20547a88404b3a.json", "detail_js": "details/ba230f6cbb20547a88404b3a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ba230f6cbb20547a88404b3a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/364d1713583d4e39b46dfe8aaeb23e45.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/56fd749c99a04d26aa8b37900dc59703.request.json" }, { "task_id": "666e0a03bcc905b932bee14c", "question_id": "Q026", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2024, and what percentage of net revenues did they represent?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,246.2 million in fiscal year 2024, representing 51.1% of net revenues (up 6.4% from $3,051.9 million in 2023).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Levi Strauss & Co.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 1, 2024 (file stem `0000094845-25-000005`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n* **Selling, general and administrative expenses:** **$3,246.2 million**\n* **Percentage of net revenues:** **51.1%**\n\n### Verification and Details\n* **Net revenues:** $6,355.3 million\n* **Calculation:** $\\frac{\\$3,246.2\\text{ million}}{\\$6,355.3\\text{ million}} \\approx 51.0786\\% \\rightarrow \\mathbf{51.1\\%}$ (as reported in the table of operations and percentages).", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the correct fiscal 2024 SG&A figure ($3,246.2 million) and the correct 51.1% share of net revenues, with the fiscal year end (December 1, 2024) and accession matching the reference. Its arithmetic checks out: 3246.2 / 6355.3 ≈ 51.08%, which rounds to 51.1%. It omits the prior-year comparison ($3,051.9 million in 2023, up 6.4%) that the reference includes, a minor completeness gap. Every figure it states (SG&A, percentage, net revenues of $6,355.3 million, accession) is directly supported by the retrieved Item 7 table in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03031245, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02884875, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014637, "wall_seconds": 34.40881465500024, "api_seconds": 32.781780055001946, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46772, "completion_tokens": 1266, "reasoning_tokens": 358, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000006", "0000094845-25-000010", "0000094845-25-000019", "0001308179-25-000101" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/666e0a03bcc905b932bee14c.json", "detail_js": "details/666e0a03bcc905b932bee14c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/666e0a03bcc905b932bee14c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1c0e1b79082741d8be1c5e7abb4a70dd.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/aea50a245ccf4a019d9d252dc7c3aaf8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4d59216329d876ed5a869839", "question_id": "Q026", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2024, and what percentage of net revenues did they represent?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,246.2 million in fiscal year 2024, representing 51.1% of net revenues (up 6.4% from $3,051.9 million in 2023).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t locate Levi Strauss & Co.’s fiscal 2024 filing in the provided Parquet files, so I can’t verify the SG&A expense or calculate its share of net revenues from the available evidence.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives SG&A of 3246.2 vs 3051.9 (6.4% growth) and 51.1% of net revenues. The candidate abstained, so it provides none of the required figures and gets little credit. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. The citation score is low because the tool calls did not support the abstention well. The candidate searched CIK 0099830 and 98317, not Levi Strauss's CIK 0000094845 from the gold accession. Its name search ran only for December 2024, and no unscoped full-text search was run. The empty results therefore do not show the filing is absent from the corpus, so 'couldn't locate' is only weakly supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00183852, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00092512, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009134, "wall_seconds": 23.029155333000745, "api_seconds": 22.00365200899978, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 19744, "completion_tokens": 1470, "reasoning_tokens": 592, "cache_read_tokens": 10657, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4d59216329d876ed5a869839.json", "detail_js": "details/4d59216329d876ed5a869839.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4d59216329d876ed5a869839.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/98be5d68afe14bde989de0b10806f9b9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5a956e57120c4bbbac97290bf6773051.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fa75d127203760deefdb76f2", "question_id": "Q026", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2024, and what percentage of net revenues did they represent?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,246.2 million in fiscal year 2024, representing 51.1% of net revenues (up 6.4% from $3,051.9 million in 2023).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine Levi Strauss & Co.’s FY2024 SG&A expense or its percentage of net revenues from the returned evidence. The metadata lookup found no FY2024 filing for the hypothesized CIK, and the filing searches returned no matching result in the scanned rows.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence is a10-K MD&A table showing SG&A of 3246.2 (FY2024) and 3051.9 (FY2023), a 6.4% increase, and 51.1% of net revenues. The candidate abstained, which earns little credit because the question was answerable. Its abstention rests on tool outputs that were empty but incomplete. Every search_filings call returned complete: false after scanning only the first 500 rows of files with roughly 60k to 130k rows each, and the DuckDB query was filtered on a hypothesized accession match. The candidate's statement that no matching result was found in the scanned rows is literally accurate. However, it omits that the scans were partial and presents the failure as evidence that the filing is absent, which the tool output does not support. The 'hypothesized CIK' wording also suggests the lookup itself may have been wrong. The citation score reflects that the claims are only partly grounded in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002099795, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0012599949999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008398, "wall_seconds": 20.678655024999898, "api_seconds": 18.501927911001985, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 14810, "completion_tokens": 1313, "reasoning_tokens": 456, "cache_read_tokens": 2287, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fa75d127203760deefdb76f2.json", "detail_js": "details/fa75d127203760deefdb76f2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fa75d127203760deefdb76f2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ac73e378f01e460da8d1bac76dec4014.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4e0968e143be49919c3563f3673d3902.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1478c34e5fdc1e72522cda9e", "question_id": "Q027", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Comcast Corporation's costs for Programming and production, Marketing and promotion, and Other operating and administrative?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation reported Programming and production costs of $37,026 million, Marketing and promotion of $8,073 million, and Other operating and administrative expenses of $40,533 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filing retrieved (**Comcast Corporation Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024**, file stem `0001166691-25-000011` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), the Table of Contents indicates that the Consolidated Statements of Income and Note disclosures (such as Note 4: Programming and Production Costs) appear on pages 61–73. However, the tool budget was exhausted before locating and displaying the specific rows of the Consolidated Statements of Income or relevant expense tables containing the numerical cost figures for:\n\n- Programming and production\n- Marketing and promotion\n- Other operating and administrative\n\nTherefore, the returned evidence is insufficient to provide the exact dollar figures for these cost categories for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 75, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives the Consolidated Statements of Income figures (37,026; 8,073; 40,533 $ millions). The candidate abstained and gave none of the three requested figures, so it is incorrect under the rubric, which grants full credit for abstention only when the question is unanswerable. The abstention is honest: the retrieved tool outputs show only the table of contents, cover page, signature block, and an auditor's report, not the income statement rows. The candidate's cited accession number and page references (Consolidated Statements of Income on page 61, Note 4 on page 73) are supported by the TOC output. The 'pages 61–73' range is a loose summary, and the claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not visible in the evidence, so citation support is good but not complete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.036694625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.035059725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016349, "wall_seconds": 40.960514096001134, "api_seconds": 38.32576764899932, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59343, "completion_tokens": 1822, "reasoning_tokens": 449, "cache_read_tokens": 5953, "excerpt_characters": 11500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1478c34e5fdc1e72522cda9e.json", "detail_js": "details/1478c34e5fdc1e72522cda9e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1478c34e5fdc1e72522cda9e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0fe3f6b68cd7488db567be5821c1cdc0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8192b4cf6d8943c8b7079e82d2950e13.request.json" }, { "task_id": "770540e284a348f0f9b764ef", "question_id": "Q027", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Comcast Corporation's costs for Programming and production, Marketing and promotion, and Other operating and administrative?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation reported Programming and production costs of $37,026 million, Marketing and promotion of $8,073 million, and Other operating and administrative expenses of $40,533 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Comcast Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001166691-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Item 7, *Consolidated Operating Results*, page 32), the costs and expenses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 were:\n\n- **Programming and production:** **$37,026 million** (or approximately **$37.026 billion**)\n- **Marketing and promotion:** **$8,073 million** (or approximately **$8.073 billion**)\n- **Other operating and administrative:** **$40,533 million** (or approximately **$40.533 billion**)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three figures match the reference and gold evidence exactly: Programming and production $37,026M, Marketing and promotion $8,073M, and Other operating and administrative $40,533M for fiscal year 2024 (year ended December 31, 2024). The units (millions) and the billion conversions are arithmetically correct. The cited accession 0001166691-25-000011, the table name 'Consolidated Operating Results', and page 32 are all supported by the read_filing output, which shows the table followed by the page 32 footer. The only minor gap is that the tool output does not explicitly label the section as 'Item 7'; the table sits in the MD&A content, so the label is plausible but not directly confirmed.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05140785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04950975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018981, "wall_seconds": 33.23355412300043, "api_seconds": 30.50651120600196, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 78214, "completion_tokens": 1356, "reasoning_tokens": 300, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/770540e284a348f0f9b764ef.json", "detail_js": "details/770540e284a348f0f9b764ef.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/770540e284a348f0f9b764ef.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/57770f796f1547d29ec65f3879576f4a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8fc8e7451acc401ca132dac98bf00253.request.json" }, { "task_id": "91bbec0c069affc69f21c757", "question_id": "Q027", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Comcast Corporation's costs for Programming and production, Marketing and promotion, and Other operating and administrative?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation reported Programming and production costs of $37,026 million, Marketing and promotion of $8,073 million, and Other operating and administrative expenses of $40,533 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Comcast reported these fiscal 2024 costs (in **millions of dollars**):\n\n- Programming and production: **$37,026 million**\n- Marketing and promotion: **$8,073 million**\n- Other operating and administrative: **$40,533 million**\n\nThe figures are from the 2024 Consolidated Operating Results table in Comcast’s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001166691-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; SQL evidence at the “Marketing and promotion” match, character offset 165,022).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three figures (Programming and production $37,026M, Marketing and promotion $8,073M, Other operating and administrative $40,533M) match the reference and the gold evidence exactly, and the millions unit is stated correctly. The tool output supports them: the 'Marketing and promotion' query returns the Consolidated Operating Results table with these 2024 values, and the match offset 165,022 is accurate. The accession 0001166691-25-000011 and file ID sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet are confirmed by the scoped query. The candidate cites the table as from the 2024 Form 10-K, which the surrounding passage supports. The small deduction is that the candidate's citation is slightly looser than ideal, since the table-specific row was retrieved via a later query rather than the one it names, though the values are still directly supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002535995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001439395, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010966, "wall_seconds": 30.940963617000307, "api_seconds": 28.822326676001467, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33560, "completion_tokens": 1438, "reasoning_tokens": 476, "cache_read_tokens": 18772, "excerpt_characters": 3800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549", "0001225208-25-002845", "0001225208-25-002849", "0001225208-25-003477" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/91bbec0c069affc69f21c757.json", "detail_js": "details/91bbec0c069affc69f21c757.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/91bbec0c069affc69f21c757.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/07b369eeac4b46cda637917dc0415ac3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3a8fd04bf18245ffb4aac8c6defbcc26.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7a4546c9813a2b7528927ec3", "question_id": "Q027", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Comcast Corporation's costs for Programming and production, Marketing and promotion, and Other operating and administrative?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation reported Programming and production costs of $37,026 million, Marketing and promotion of $8,073 million, and Other operating and administrative expenses of $40,533 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Comcast reported the following costs for fiscal 2024, **in millions of dollars**:\n\n- Programming and production: **$37,026 million**\n- Marketing and promotion: **$8,073 million**\n- Other operating and administrative: **$40,533 million**\n\nThe figures are from the 2024 Consolidated Operating Results table in Comcast’s 2024 Annual Report, file stem **0001166691-25-000011**, file ID **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**, at character offsets **160,956–172,956**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three figures (Programming and production $37,026M, Marketing and promotion $8,073M, Other operating and administrative $40,533M) match the reference and the gold quote exactly, and units (millions) are stated correctly. The cited file ID (sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet), accession (0001166691-25-000011), and offsets (160956–172956) match the read_filing output, whose text contains the 'Consolidated Operating Results' table with these values for 2024. Minor deduction only because the candidate's 'file stem' label and the 'Annual Report' framing are slightly loose, though they are supported by the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004861695, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003028195, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018335, "wall_seconds": 33.79150594800012, "api_seconds": 31.44355150499905, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 62031, "completion_tokens": 1290, "reasoning_tokens": 468, "cache_read_tokens": 27112, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7a4546c9813a2b7528927ec3.json", "detail_js": "details/7a4546c9813a2b7528927ec3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7a4546c9813a2b7528927ec3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/29e4f267d1c04245b0a93a84958df926.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/18e69d115137496fb1722e6edd952729.request.json" }, { "task_id": "551ee5966be220c3c59a84ba", "question_id": "Q028", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Citigroup Inc.'s Net interest income, Non-interest revenue, and Revenues net of interest expense?", "reference": "In 2024, Citigroup Inc. reported Net interest income of $54,095 million, Non-interest revenue of $27,044 million, and Total revenues net of interest expense of $81,139 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Citigroup Inc.'s **Consolidated Statement of Income** in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing file stem: `0000831001-25-000067`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the reported revenue figures for **fiscal year 2024** are as follows:\n\n* **Net interest income:** **$54,095 million** (calculated as Interest income of $143,713 million less Interest expense of $89,618 million)\n* **Total non-interest revenues:** **$27,044 million**\n* **Total revenues, net of interest expense:** **$81,139 million** (calculated as Net interest income of $54,095 million + Total non-interest revenues of $27,044 million)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three figures match the reference exactly: Net interest income $54,095M, Total non-interest revenues $27,044M, and Revenues net of interest expense $81,139M. Units and fiscal year (2024) are correct. The tool output contains the Consolidated Statement of Income rows showing these values, along with interest income ($143,713M) and interest expense ($89,618M), so the candidate's stated derivations are supported. The filing header confirms the 10-K, period ending 20241231, and the accession number. The candidate cites the income statement rather than the gold executive summary table, but that income statement is in the tool evidence, so the citation is valid. Small deduction only because the executive summary table cited in the gold evidence was not the candidate's source.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04153765, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04009275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014449, "wall_seconds": 36.97562390299936, "api_seconds": 34.34140265399765, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 60771, "completion_tokens": 1427, "reasoning_tokens": 237, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/551ee5966be220c3c59a84ba.json", "detail_js": "details/551ee5966be220c3c59a84ba.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/551ee5966be220c3c59a84ba.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a73d61c4149b4ab588cc4915a4b7c2fb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/992864b09c9f41be8c2950d18bb6804d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4b4a649440a72008ea48c4b3", "question_id": "Q028", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Citigroup Inc.'s Net interest income, Non-interest revenue, and Revenues net of interest expense?", "reference": "In 2024, Citigroup Inc. reported Net interest income of $54,095 million, Non-interest revenue of $27,044 million, and Total revenues net of interest expense of $81,139 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filing data from Citigroup Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (accession/file_stem: `0000831001-25-000067`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the search located the document and identified the presence of the Consolidated Statement of Income. However, because the tool budget was exhausted before reading the consolidated income statement table itself (located around character offset 646,207), the retrieved evidence only includes segment-level reporting (such as the *Services* segment) rather than Citigroup Inc.'s consolidated figures for:\n\n- **Net interest income**\n- **Non-interest revenue**\n- **Revenues net of interest expense**\n\nConsequently, the evidence retrieved within the tool budget is insufficient to provide the exact consolidated figures for Citigroup Inc. for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 65, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence contains the consolidated 2024 total of $81,139 million for revenues net of interest expense, and the reference also gives NII ($54,095M) and non-interest revenue ($27,044M). The candidate gives none of these figures and abstains, saying the consolidated income statement was not retrieved. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, so correctness is low. The candidate does correctly identify the filing (accession 0000831001-25-000067) and the offset of the Consolidated Statement of Income (646,207), both supported by the tool outputs. Its statements that the retrieved evidence is segment-level (the Services segment tables) are accurate. However, the claim that the 'tool budget was exhausted' is not shown in any tool output, which lowers citation support.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04623975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04397025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022695, "wall_seconds": 35.01361897899915, "api_seconds": 33.52030269700117, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 73572, "completion_tokens": 1550, "reasoning_tokens": 491, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/4b4a649440a72008ea48c4b3.json", "detail_js": "details/4b4a649440a72008ea48c4b3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4b4a649440a72008ea48c4b3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9c17a21f802543ad98ffa7ed39560a5c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e11fb5871cc84b29bc912b99983e2f86.request.json" }, { "task_id": "345944a20125240be05f4082", "question_id": "Q028", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Citigroup Inc.'s Net interest income, Non-interest revenue, and Revenues net of interest expense?", "reference": "In 2024, Citigroup Inc. reported Net interest income of $54,095 million, Non-interest revenue of $27,044 million, and Total revenues net of interest expense of $81,139 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Citigroup Inc. reported the following for fiscal year 2024, in **millions of dollars**:\n\n- **Net interest income:** $54,095 million \n- **Non-interest revenue:** $27,044 million \n- **Revenues, net of interest expense:** $81,139 million \n\nThe figures are from Citigroup’s 2024 Form 10-K, filing **0000831001-25-000067**, file ID **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**, in the “Summary of Selected Financial Data” table (SQL excerpt beginning at character 58,000). The revenues figure reconciles: $54,095 million + $27,044 million = $81,139 million.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three figures match the reference: Net interest income $54,095M, Non-interest revenue $27,044M, and Revenues net of interest expense $81,139M. The units (millions) are correct, and the reconciliation 54,095 + 27,044 = 81,139 is arithmetically right. The cited accession 0000831001-25-000067 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet match the tool outputs. The tool evidence shows the figures in the 'Summary of Selected Financial Data' table at the offset the candidate names (58,000), which is consistent with the gold quote's table, though the gold labels it differently ('Executive Summary Table'). That labeling difference is minor and does not affect the values. Small deduction only for the section-name discrepancy with the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00434182, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00283872, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015031, "wall_seconds": 40.73372754400043, "api_seconds": 38.02868635899904, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56310, "completion_tokens": 1683, "reasoning_tokens": 501, "cache_read_tokens": 28012, "excerpt_characters": 9600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000069", "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001306", "0000950103-25-001321", "0000950103-25-001356", "0000950103-25-001358", "0000950103-25-001363", "0000950103-25-001364", "0000950103-25-001365", "0000950103-25-001366", "0000950103-25-001370", "0000950103-25-001372", "0000950103-25-001373", "0000950103-25-001374", "0000950103-25-001376", "0000950103-25-001379", "0000950103-25-001380", "0000950103-25-001382", "0000950103-25-001386", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/345944a20125240be05f4082.json", "detail_js": "details/345944a20125240be05f4082.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/345944a20125240be05f4082.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7fcab8dfde39434ab8c2d463431eb070.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a0c2fde741d64f6085715a16606045c1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f682da7d68e8c4a8c63f3617", "question_id": "Q028", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Citigroup Inc.'s Net interest income, Non-interest revenue, and Revenues net of interest expense?", "reference": "In 2024, Citigroup Inc. reported Net interest income of $54,095 million, Non-interest revenue of $27,044 million, and Total revenues net of interest expense of $81,139 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Citigroup reported the following for fiscal 2024, in **millions of dollars**:\n\n- **Net interest income:** $53,129 million\n- **Non-interest revenue:** $28,010 million\n- **Revenues, net of interest expense:** $81,139 million\n\nThe 2024 revenue figure is shown in the filing’s “Segment Revenues and Income (Loss)” table as total Citigroup net revenues. Net interest income plus non-interest revenue reconciles to that total: **$53,129 million + $28,010 million = $81,139 million**.\n\n**Source:** Citigroup Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000831001-25-000067`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; filing identifies the company and summarizes 2024 results at offsets 16,187–28,187, and reports total Citigroup net revenues of $81,139 million at offsets 62,875–74,875.", "correctness": 35, "citation_support": 25, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gets the total right: $81,139 million matches the reference and the 'Total Citigroup net revenues' row in the segment table the tool returned. It gets Net interest income ($53,129M vs. reference $54,095M) and Non-interest revenue ($28,010M vs. reference $27,044M) wrong, and the two components are off in opposite directions. The 'reconciles' claim is circular: the candidate chose split values that sum to the total without any retrieved figure for either component. The retrieved evidence only supports qualitative statements (NII down 1%, non-interest revenue up 15%) and does not contain the consolidated NII or non-interest revenue dollar amounts. The cited offsets support the total and the general summary, but nothing in the tool output supports the two component values the candidate reports, so citation support is weak.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00705206, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00367806, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.003374, "wall_seconds": 42.08662451099917, "api_seconds": 40.1341588660016, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 97846, "completion_tokens": 1869, "reasoning_tokens": 828, "cache_read_tokens": 46571, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001557", "0000950103-25-001733", "0000950103-25-001783", "0000950103-25-001858", "0000950103-25-001886", "0000950103-25-001978", "0000950103-25-002065", "0000950103-25-002107", "0000950103-25-002155", "0000950103-25-002302", "0000950103-25-002500", "0000950103-25-002592", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025100", "0001193125-25-036768", "0001193125-25-036777", "0001193125-25-036786", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/f682da7d68e8c4a8c63f3617.json", "detail_js": "details/f682da7d68e8c4a8c63f3617.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f682da7d68e8c4a8c63f3617.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e15108dd24a24a43846d694d9bf970b9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5bbd3f8ac6fc4f94a98c24ea996ee2de.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2239f305a9c3b3291129d656", "question_id": "Q029", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Total net revenues in fiscal years 2024 and 2023?", "reference": "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported Total net revenues of $53,512 million in 2024, compared to $46,254 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File Stem: `0000886982-25-000005`, from file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), **Total net revenues** were:\n\n- **Fiscal Year 2024:** **$53,512 million** ($53.512 billion)\n- **Fiscal Year 2023:** **$46,254 million** ($46.254 billion)\n\n---\n\n### Evidence Details\nFrom the **Net Revenues** table under *Management's Discussion and Analysis* (around character offset 359,500):\n\n| *(in $ millions)* | Year Ended December 31, 2024 | Year Ended December 31, 2023 |\n| :--- | :--- | :--- |\n| Total non-interest revenues | $45,456 | $39,903 |\n| Net interest income | $8,056 | $6,351 |\n| **Total net revenues** | **$53,512** | **$46,254** |", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports Total net revenues of $53,512 million for 2024 and $46,254 million for 2023, matching the reference and the gold evidence table. Units ($ millions) and the fiscal year end (December 31, 2024) are correct. The supporting sub-line items (total non-interest revenues 45,456/39,903 and net interest income 8,056/6,351) appear verbatim in the tool output from the scoped filing. Minor imprecision: the character offset of about 359,500 is approximate, since the 'Net Revenues' heading begins slightly earlier. This does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03851305, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03732525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011878, "wall_seconds": 33.92918928100153, "api_seconds": 30.86935103599899, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 54215, "completion_tokens": 1486, "reasoning_tokens": 299, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000769993-25-000253", "0000769993-25-000301", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000886982-25-000009", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-042819", "0001193125-25-013544", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-054559" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/2239f305a9c3b3291129d656.json", "detail_js": "details/2239f305a9c3b3291129d656.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2239f305a9c3b3291129d656.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/87ed4542fda441c7a2e1befa1a913321.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/62d195f6f5eb4955b23302d8aecd236b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8cce746a1037a877a2e1818f", "question_id": "Q029", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Total net revenues in fiscal years 2024 and 2023?", "reference": "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported Total net revenues of $53,512 million in 2024, compared to $46,254 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings located within the available datasets:\n\nIn The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / `file_stem`: `0000886982-25-000005`, Parquet file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\nDue to tool execution budget limits being reached before the Consolidated Statement of Earnings table (identified around position ~659,391) could be extracted, the specific numerical values for **Total net revenues** for fiscal years 2024 and 2023 cannot be confirmed with sufficient evidence from the retrieved filing text.", "correctness": 8, "citation_support": 30, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold quote gives Total net revenues of $53,512M (2024) and $46,254M (2023). The candidate abstains and provides neither figure, so it fails the core question. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. The candidate correctly identifies the 2024 10-K accession (0000886982-25-000005) and its parquet file, which the tool outputs support. However, its claims of tool budget exhaustion and a Consolidated Statement of Earnings position near ~659,391 are not in the tool evidence. The tool outputs show a 'Total net revenues' match at position 359999 and a statements match at 12384, and no budget-exhaustion error appears. The candidate also never read the revenue table, so its statement that the values 'cannot be confirmed' reflects its own retrieval failure rather than missing evidence in the filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.062000150000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.06000675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019934, "wall_seconds": 36.45659674600029, "api_seconds": 33.783075921997806, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 92458, "completion_tokens": 1497, "reasoning_tokens": 405, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000769993-25-000253", "0000769993-25-000301", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000886982-25-000009", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-042819", "0001193125-25-013544", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-054559" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8cce746a1037a877a2e1818f.json", "detail_js": "details/8cce746a1037a877a2e1818f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8cce746a1037a877a2e1818f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1dd51fcfc44c48e0b29b8f0e67155f94.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2159ea55726a454eb302e9251a9bb56c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7b0ec0299445c8c31951e142", "question_id": "Q029", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Total net revenues in fiscal years 2024 and 2023?", "reference": "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported Total net revenues of $53,512 million in 2024, compared to $46,254 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the figures from the available filing text: the 2025 filing lookup returned a duplicate-filing-ID error when I tried to read it. I can’t provide reliable revenue amounts without that evidence.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the gold evidence: Total net revenues were $53,512M in 2024 and $46,254M in 2023. The candidate gave no figures and abstained, so it does not match the reference. Its abstention is not justified under the rubric because the reference is answerable, though it avoids a fabricated answer. Its stated reason is supported by the tool output: the two read attempts returned 'Duplicate filing ID in source' errors, and the one successful query returned no rows for the revenue phrase. The candidate's description of the failure as a '2025 filing lookup' is slightly loose, since the errors came from specific file-stem queries, but the core claim that verification failed is accurate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00232538, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00138898, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009364, "wall_seconds": 29.086764314000902, "api_seconds": 28.354704530000163, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30775, "completion_tokens": 1485, "reasoning_tokens": 640, "cache_read_tokens": 18108, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000891836-25-000009", "0000950170-25-001792", "0000950170-25-003525", "0000950170-25-004852", "0000950170-25-005317", "0000950170-25-005378", "0000950170-25-006503", "0000950170-25-006771", "0000950170-25-007181", "0000950170-25-007368", "0000950170-25-007382", "0000950170-25-007493", "0000950170-25-007866", "0000950170-25-008840", "0000950170-25-009084", "0000950170-25-009246", "0000950170-25-009541", "0000950170-25-010474", "0000950170-25-011696", "0000950170-25-012165", "0000950170-25-013043", "0000950170-25-013327", "0000950170-25-013426", "0000950170-25-013699", "0000950170-25-018981", "0000950170-25-019755", "0000950170-25-021062", "0000950170-25-021406", "0000950170-25-023933", "0000950170-25-024603", "0000950170-25-026526", "0000950170-25-026682", "0000950170-25-028581", "0000950170-25-028927", "0000950170-25-028934", "0000950170-25-029156", "0000950170-25-029586", "0000950170-25-029932", "0001193125-25-027397", "0002021544-25-000002" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/7b0ec0299445c8c31951e142.json", "detail_js": "details/7b0ec0299445c8c31951e142.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7b0ec0299445c8c31951e142.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/369380dfe5c44479b3c60b4090200412.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/40cb6751a28a45cebe32f6469b9d81f8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "405a9afe690dc743d1332712", "question_id": "Q029", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Total net revenues in fiscal years 2024 and 2023?", "reference": "The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported Total net revenues of $53,512 million in 2024, compared to $46,254 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The evidence confirms that the filing is Goldman Sachs’ 2024 Form 10-K, but the returned passage does not show the “Total net revenues” figures for 2024 and 2023. I can’t provide those amounts from the evidence available.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Total net revenues of $53,512M (2024) and $46,254M (2023). The candidate abstained and gave none of these figures, so it fails the completeness requirement. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. The candidate's claims are supported by the tool outputs: the read_filing window ends before the net revenues table and does not show the figures, and the page footers confirm the Goldman Sachs 2024 Form 10-K. The tool evidence also shows a 2024 vs. 2023 efficiency-ratio comparison, but no revenue totals. The abstention is therefore honest about the retrieved evidence, but it does not answer the question.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004118235, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002566335, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015519, "wall_seconds": 36.743462153999644, "api_seconds": 35.84545157999855, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 51245, "completion_tokens": 1552, "reasoning_tokens": 604, "cache_read_tokens": 23841, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000891836-25-000009", "0000950170-25-001792", "0000950170-25-003525", "0000950170-25-004852", "0000950170-25-005317", "0000950170-25-005378", "0000950170-25-006503", "0000950170-25-006771", "0000950170-25-007181", "0000950170-25-007368", "0000950170-25-007382", "0000950170-25-007493", "0000950170-25-007866", "0000950170-25-008840", "0000950170-25-009084", "0000950170-25-009246", "0000950170-25-009541", "0000950170-25-010474", "0000950170-25-011696", "0000950170-25-012253", "0000950170-25-012308", "0000950170-25-013181", "0000950170-25-013188", "0000950170-25-018981", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-021506", "0000950170-25-022983", "0000950170-25-023062", "0000950170-25-026682", "0000950170-25-027392", "0000950170-25-028692", "0000950170-25-028856", "0000950170-25-029106", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-027379", "0002021544-25-000002" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/405a9afe690dc743d1332712.json", "detail_js": "details/405a9afe690dc743d1332712.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/405a9afe690dc743d1332712.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/de9741531ab34850bb80e0e0c473a34d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/089904bb099c4c5d87d4a9c38e4f01ac.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5e50ea69a3738459f8882fdd", "question_id": "Q030", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were ConocoPhillips's expenses for Purchased commodities and Production and operating expenses?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips reported Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / File Stem: `0001163165-25-000012`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the expenses for fiscal year 2024 were:\n\n- **Purchased commodities:** **$20,012 million** ($20.012 billion)\n- **Production and operating expenses:** **$8,751 million** ($8.751 billion)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports Purchased commodities $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses $8,751 million for fiscal 2024, matching the reference and the gold evidence table exactly (values in millions, year 2024 column). The accession 0001163165-25-000012 and the 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 are confirmed by the tool output (the filing header shows CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT 20241231 and CIK 0001163165). The billion conversions ($20.012B, $8.751B) are arithmetically correct. The tool evidence in the transcript includes the income statement table with these exact figures, so the claims are fully supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0389134, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.037758, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011554, "wall_seconds": 30.318235841001297, "api_seconds": 28.58608301500135, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56953, "completion_tokens": 989, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-017601", "0000950170-25-017692", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019431", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000309", "0001308179-25-000310" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5e50ea69a3738459f8882fdd.json", "detail_js": "details/5e50ea69a3738459f8882fdd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5e50ea69a3738459f8882fdd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/92c49d1f03af4816ad5a3362a1716e0e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/350ba8e114024b42af63ec6b171fe8ec.request.json" }, { "task_id": "177dff567eb58ed0f0fe8015", "question_id": "Q030", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were ConocoPhillips's expenses for Purchased commodities and Production and operating expenses?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips reported Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0001163165-25-000012`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 7 – *Results of Operations / Income Statement Analysis*, page 41):\n\nIn fiscal year 2024:\n- **Purchased commodities:** **$20,012 million** ($20.012 billion)\n- **Production and operating expenses:** **$8,751 million** ($8.751 billion)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the gold quote exactly: Purchased commodities $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses $8,751 million for 2024, with correct units and period. The read_filing output in the tool evidence contains the same table rows, the 'Years Ended December 31 / 2024' header, and a '41 ConocoPhillips 2024 10-K' page marker, which supports the cited page 41. The Item 7 label is an inference from the 'Results of Operations' heading and the Item 8 cross-reference in the text rather than an explicit label, so citation support is slightly below full. The failed or erroneous tool calls did not affect the final answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.047158, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.045219, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001939, "wall_seconds": 31.32261573300093, "api_seconds": 29.45242538399907, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 73357, "completion_tokens": 1265, "reasoning_tokens": 358, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/177dff567eb58ed0f0fe8015.json", "detail_js": "details/177dff567eb58ed0f0fe8015.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/177dff567eb58ed0f0fe8015.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4d2766acb0484d26be46daa7799ef83b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f9817d0779a94ab78d9a7d09f1602c88.request.json" }, { "task_id": "96a1b4a311391e618ca74a09", "question_id": "Q030", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were ConocoPhillips's expenses for Purchased commodities and Production and operating expenses?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips reported Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "ConocoPhillips reported these fiscal year 2024 expenses, in **millions of dollars**:\n\n- **Purchased commodities:** $20,012 million\n- **Production and operating expenses:** $8,751 million\n\nSource: 2024 Form 10-K, filing accession `0001163165-25-000012`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. The income statement table labels the amounts “Millions of Dollars.”", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives Purchased commodities of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million for 2024, matching the reference and the gold quote. The units ('Millions of Dollars') match the table header in the tool output. The accession 0001163165-25-000012 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet match the tool results, which show the 2024 column of the income statement table with these exact values. The '2024 Form 10-K' label is a reasonable inference from the 2024 column, not an explicit tool statement, so citation support is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001922495, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001055095, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008674, "wall_seconds": 19.657015061999118, "api_seconds": 18.902193134999834, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 21296, "completion_tokens": 1070, "reasoning_tokens": 382, "cache_read_tokens": 9592, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019431", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/96a1b4a311391e618ca74a09.json", "detail_js": "details/96a1b4a311391e618ca74a09.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/96a1b4a311391e618ca74a09.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ef5daca986a242008db3803d89b40689.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c4bbb81de2ca4219acf80b7e559a782e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d893004a7851083b330d6bdf", "question_id": "Q030", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were ConocoPhillips's expenses for Purchased commodities and Production and operating expenses?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips reported Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For fiscal year 2024, ConocoPhillips reported **Purchased commodities expense of $20,012 million** and **Production and operating expenses of $8,751 million**.\n\nThe 2024 10-K presents both figures in millions of dollars. Source: filing **0001163165-25-000012**, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at character offsets **165,014–177,014**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the quoted table: Purchased commodities $20,012 million and Production and operating expenses $8,751 million for 2024, with millions as the unit. The accession 0001163165-25-000012, file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and character offsets 165014–177014 match the read_filing output, and the table text in that tool output contains both values. Minor deduction: the gold evidence labels the section 'Item 8', but the tool text places the table in the MD&A Income Statement Analysis. The candidate does not name a section, so this does not make it wrong.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00323378, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00180598, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014278, "wall_seconds": 25.98979043899999, "api_seconds": 24.85662310599764, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40170, "completion_tokens": 1258, "reasoning_tokens": 371, "cache_read_tokens": 18228, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-012967", "0000950170-25-012974", "0000950170-25-017601", "0000950170-25-017692", "0000950170-25-017717", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-017760", "0000950170-25-017772", "0000950170-25-017806", "0000950170-25-017810", "0000950170-25-017814", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019404", "0000950170-25-019407", "0000950170-25-019409", "0000950170-25-019411", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019431", "0000950170-25-019453", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d893004a7851083b330d6bdf.json", "detail_js": "details/d893004a7851083b330d6bdf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d893004a7851083b330d6bdf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c6ab2ab458f2449d9dc5071cbbb8aebd.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/42974d96d65145a283d92d779f7de6c5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c1fd05b81c27963e48dd65c3", "question_id": "Q031", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income in fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $150,307 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the queries performed within the available tool budget, Marathon Petroleum Corporation's annual report (Form 10-K) for fiscal year 2024 is not available among the queried filings in the dataset (only short-form filings/ownership reports with character counts under 10,000 characters were located for CIK 0001510281). \n\nTherefore, there is **insufficient evidence** in the accessible data to provide Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income for fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 20, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence gives Total revenues and other income of 140,412 (2024) and 150,307 (2023) in $ millions. The candidate abstained, so it gives none of the required figures. Its abstention is not supported by the tool evidence. The only filename search for 'marathon' failed with a binder error and was never retried. Every other query was scoped to CIK 0001510281, which is not the CIK behind the gold accession (0001510295), and the candidate never queried that accession. Its statement that the FY2024 10-K 'is not available among the queried filings' is literally true of those queries but does not establish that the filing is absent from the dataset. Missing evidence does not excuse a wrong answer, so correctness is 0. Citation support is low because the claim of unavailability overreaches what the searches showed.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03174805, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03061425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011338, "wall_seconds": 32.96834532200046, "api_seconds": 31.865745714001605, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 45517, "completion_tokens": 1328, "reasoning_tokens": 353, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000902664-25-001519", "0000902664-25-001633", "0000902664-25-001760", "0000902664-25-001893", "0000902664-25-002000", "0001062993-25-000932", "0001062993-25-000933", "0001062993-25-001182", "0001062993-25-001570", "0001062993-25-003563", "0001510281-25-000007", "0001510281-25-000022", "0001510281-25-000031", "0001510281-25-000033", "0001510281-25-000034", "0001510281-25-000037", "0001510281-25-000045", "0001510281-25-000049", "0001510281-25-000052", "0001510281-25-000053", "0001510281-25-000056", "0001510281-25-000058", "0001510281-25-000078", "0001510281-25-000082" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c1fd05b81c27963e48dd65c3.json", "detail_js": "details/c1fd05b81c27963e48dd65c3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c1fd05b81c27963e48dd65c3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/659b3f3f42b54aaab7f48e32732e84c5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3d7a736a687b4f8da3597c3d864fc4b7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3a1faf0e50d16ac85e1e5c5b", "question_id": "Q031", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income in fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $150,307 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Marathon Petroleum Corporation's **Consolidated Statements of Income** (and Consolidated Results of Operations) in its 2024 Form 10-K (filing `0001510295-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Total Revenues and Other Income**\n* **Fiscal Year 2024:** **$140,412 million** ($140.412 billion)\n* **Fiscal Year 2023:** **$150,307 million** ($150.307 billion)\n\n---\n\n### **Comparison / Variance**\n* **Dollar Change:** A decrease of **$9,895 million** (or **-$9.895 billion**)\n $$\\$140,412\\text{ million} - \\$150,307\\text{ million} = -\\$9,895\\text{ million}$$\n* **Percentage Change:** A decrease of approximately **6.58%**\n $$\\frac{-\\$9,895}{\\$150,307} \\approx -6.583\\%$$\n\n---\n\n### **Breakdown of Components** *(in millions of dollars)*\n\n| Component | Fiscal Year 2024 | Fiscal Year 2023 | Variance (2024 vs. 2023) |\n| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |\n| **Sales and other operating revenues** | $138,864 | $148,379 | $(9,515) |\n| **Income from equity method investments** | $1,048 | $742 | $306 |\n| **Net gain on disposal of assets** | $28 | $217 | $(189) |\n| **Other income** | $472 | $969 | $(497) |\n| **Total revenues and other income** | **$140,412** | **$150,307** | **$(9,895)** |", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's totals ($140,412M for 2024 and $150,307M for 2023) match the reference and the filing tables. The dollar change of -$9,895M and the -6.58% change are arithmetically correct (9,895/150,307 ≈ 6.58%). The component breakdown also checks out: the four line-item variances (-9,515, +306, -189, -497) sum to -9,895. The accession number and file ID match the tool output. The candidate attributes the figures to the Consolidated Statements of Income, which the read_filing output does contain, and the same values appear in the MD&A results table the gold evidence cites. The only minor gap is that the gold evidence points to the MD&A section, while the candidate leads with the income statement; both appear in the retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0505706, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.047802000000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0027686, "wall_seconds": 35.20821921000061, "api_seconds": 32.90128442799869, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 83547, "completion_tokens": 1575, "reasoning_tokens": 296, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3a1faf0e50d16ac85e1e5c5b.json", "detail_js": "details/3a1faf0e50d16ac85e1e5c5b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3a1faf0e50d16ac85e1e5c5b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cc2d96f596e4451fbf7ee234c6b09cb5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b50daba767ef49f3ab46cc1e3a7daf85.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d5a5a28a23ba027b15c0ea5e", "question_id": "Q031", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income in fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $150,307 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum reported **Total revenues and other income** of **$140.412 billion in fiscal 2024**, compared with **$150.307 billion in 2023**. That was a decrease of **$9.895 billion**, or about **6.6%**. The filing presents the figures in millions of dollars.\n\n**Source:** Marathon Petroleum’s 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0001510295-25-000012`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; “Revenues and other income” table.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: $140.412 billion for 2024 and $150.307 billion for 2023 are the $140,412M and $150,307M figures in the millions-denominated table. The $9.895 billion decrease and the roughly 6.6% decline (9,895/150,307 ≈ 6.58%) are arithmetically correct, and the candidate correctly notes the table is in millions. The cited accession 0001510295-25-000012 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet appear in the tool outputs, and the table row values match the tool-returned Results of Operations text. The only minor gap is that the section label is a sub-table heading rather than the exact 'Results of Operations' heading, which is a small presentation issue.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00171487, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00089947, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008154, "wall_seconds": 16.180568854999365, "api_seconds": 15.544340654001644, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 16255, "completion_tokens": 962, "reasoning_tokens": 321, "cache_read_tokens": 5582, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001665", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001669", "0000950170-25-001671", "0000950170-25-001673", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001678", "0000950170-25-001681", "0000950170-25-001684", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000002", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d5a5a28a23ba027b15c0ea5e.json", "detail_js": "details/d5a5a28a23ba027b15c0ea5e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d5a5a28a23ba027b15c0ea5e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2cfc3c0aef8c453682dcffa8d5c293b8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/68726a0ebb1d4f16a70aa42fe19b0d4a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "486ee47164b7ae42b0cd956b", "question_id": "Q031", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Marathon Petroleum Corporation's Total revenues and other income in fiscal year 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $150,307 million in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported **total revenues and other income of $140.412 billion in fiscal 2024**, compared with **$150.307 billion in 2023**. That was a decrease of **$9.895 billion** (about **6.6%**).\n\nSource: 2024 Form 10-K, “Consolidated Results of Operations” (filing `0001510295-25-000012`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), passage at character offsets 248,764–260,764. Amounts are in millions of dollars: $140,412 million and $150,307 million.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference: $140,412 million (2024) and $150,307 million (2023), restated as $140.412 billion and $150.307 billion. The decrease of $9.895 billion and about 6.6% are correct (9,895/150,307 ≈ 6.58%). The cited section title and character offsets 248,764–260,764 match the read_filing tool output, and the table row in that output matches the gold quote. Minor deduction only for the 'fiscal year' wording, since the company reports on a calendar year ending December 31.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002702725, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001424925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012778, "wall_seconds": 17.633123562000037, "api_seconds": 16.695681975003026, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32910, "completion_tokens": 888, "reasoning_tokens": 197, "cache_read_tokens": 13600, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001665", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001669", "0000950170-25-001671", "0000950170-25-001673", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001678", "0000950170-25-001681", "0000950170-25-001684", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000002", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/486ee47164b7ae42b0cd956b.json", "detail_js": "details/486ee47164b7ae42b0cd956b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/486ee47164b7ae42b0cd956b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fb93d7c057854bd684d26355bba9677a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a0a995467f92477b8d583484b75182e7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e4c4bb7de33f9bd400f663c5", "question_id": "Q032", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales, Cost of products sold, and Gross margin in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Whirlpool Corporation reported Net sales of $16,607 million, Cost of products sold of $14,026 million, and Gross margin of $2,581 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Whirlpool Corporation’s **Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)** in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID: `0000106640-25-000011`, file: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Net sales:** **$16,607 million** (or $16.607 billion)\n* **Cost of products sold:** **$14,026 million** (or $14.026 billion)\n* **Gross margin:** **$2,581 million** (or $2.581 billion)\n\n*(Calculation check: $\\$16,607\\text{ million} - \\$14,026\\text{ million} = \\$2,581\\text{ million}$)*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "All three figures (Net sales $16,607M, Cost of products sold $14,026M, Gross margin $2,581M) match the reference and the gold quote, and the units (millions) and fiscal year 2024 are correct. The arithmetic check (16,607 - 14,026 = 2,581) is correct. The candidate's citation is supported by the tool output: the income statement table with these values, the statement title 'CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)', the 'Year Ended December 31' header, and the accession 0000106640-25-000011 from sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet. The one small gap is that the tool evidence never states the filing form type, so the 'Form 10-K' label is not directly supported, which lowers citation_support slightly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0217564, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.020802, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009544, "wall_seconds": 24.840738220000276, "api_seconds": 23.853004092001356, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30515, "completion_tokens": 1353, "reasoning_tokens": 242, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/e4c4bb7de33f9bd400f663c5.json", "detail_js": "details/e4c4bb7de33f9bd400f663c5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e4c4bb7de33f9bd400f663c5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/96bfb42936d04e15a9b1471d014d95be.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/622c09dabd654efd940b32d536211a60.request.json" }, { "task_id": "724d380dda736ea0d90d2436", "question_id": "Q032", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales, Cost of products sold, and Gross margin in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Whirlpool Corporation reported Net sales of $16,607 million, Cost of products sold of $14,026 million, and Gross margin of $2,581 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Whirlpool Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Filing file stem: `0000106640-25-000011`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n* **Net sales:** **$16,607 million** (or approximately **$16.607 billion**)\n* **Cost of products sold:** **$14,026 million** (or approximately **$14.026 billion**)\n* **Gross margin:** **$2,581 million** (or approximately **$2.581 billion**) (representing $16,607 million − $14,026 million, or ~15.54% of net sales)", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the gold evidence exactly: Net sales $16,607M, Cost of products sold $14,026M, Gross margin $2,581M for fiscal 2024. The tool output shows the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) with these values for 2024 in the 10-K with accession 0000106640-25-000011, so the citation is supported. The candidate's extra computed ratio (~15.54%) is correct arithmetic: 2581/16607 ≈ 15.54%. Minor deduction because the candidate's 'approximately $16.607 billion' rewording and the ratio are additions not requested, and the 'Filing file stem'/File ID details are extra but accurate. The reference is answerable, and the candidate did not abstain, which is correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.06825605, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.06537585, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0028802, "wall_seconds": 34.824023247001605, "api_seconds": 33.49685017699812, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 126798, "completion_tokens": 1074, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 17998, "excerpt_characters": 37999, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/724d380dda736ea0d90d2436.json", "detail_js": "details/724d380dda736ea0d90d2436.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/724d380dda736ea0d90d2436.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e33e0ebff587441c9eb8457b92be82e4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7943ae6497ae44dea6e51ffbf28523c5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "518be0f23611e26c55351b93", "question_id": "Q032", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales, Cost of products sold, and Gross margin in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Whirlpool Corporation reported Net sales of $16,607 million, Cost of products sold of $14,026 million, and Gross margin of $2,581 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Whirlpool Corporation reported the following for fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (in millions of dollars):\n\n- **Net sales:** $16,607 million \n- **Cost of products sold:** $14,026 million \n- **Gross margin:** $2,581 million \n\nThe arithmetic reconciles: $16,607 million − $14,026 million = $2,581 million.\n\n**Source:** Whirlpool’s 2024 Form 10-K, file stem `0000106640-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; consolidated statements of income excerpt from the SQL query (the displayed table begins around character offset 203,822).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's Net sales ($16,607M), Cost of products sold ($14,026M), and Gross margin ($2,581M) match the reference and the gold quote exactly. The arithmetic reconciles (16,607 − 14,026 = 2,581), and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 matches the statement header. The cited accession 0000106640-25-000011 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet appear in the tool output. The stated offset of about 203,822 is consistent with the tool call (200,000 + 4,122 − 300). The tool output directly shows the consolidated statements of income with these figures, so the citation is well supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002699515, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001467215, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012323, "wall_seconds": 22.928583311000693, "api_seconds": 21.696728331997292, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 34696, "completion_tokens": 1206, "reasoning_tokens": 386, "cache_read_tokens": 17234, "excerpt_characters": 7200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/518be0f23611e26c55351b93.json", "detail_js": "details/518be0f23611e26c55351b93.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/518be0f23611e26c55351b93.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9b8258d636ab44e89c0ae584222c3e88.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0d9da6118cd84a58ba86b717fbc3a0a4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f2f2eee0825795f8b79bb76d", "question_id": "Q032", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales, Cost of products sold, and Gross margin in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Whirlpool Corporation reported Net sales of $16,607 million, Cost of products sold of $14,026 million, and Gross margin of $2,581 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned filing evidence confirms this is Whirlpool Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K, but it does not show the consolidated income-statement figures for **Net sales**, **Cost of products sold**, or **Gross margin**. I can’t provide those amounts from the evidence returned.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence is the consolidated income statement in accession 0000106640-25-000011, showing Net sales $16,607M, Cost of products sold $14,026M, and Gross margin $2,581M. The candidate abstained, which is not justified because the question has a reference answer. Its abstention is partly grounded in the tool outputs: the 'Net sales' and 'Cost of products sold' reads returned only MD&A segment text and the consolidated income-statement table never appeared, so 'the evidence returned does not show the figures' is accurate about what the tools returned. It also correctly identifies the filing as Whirlpool's 2024 10-K, which the Item 1 text ('approximately $17 billion in annual net sales ... in 2024') loosely supports. However, the candidate did not try further reads (e.g., around the consolidated statements or a needle such as 'Gross margin') before giving up, and the citation support is limited to the accuracy of its description of the retrieved text, not to the answer itself.", "known_cost_usd": 0.005013905, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003018905, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001995, "wall_seconds": 36.291061900001296, "api_seconds": 34.044277846000114, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59764, "completion_tokens": 1709, "reasoning_tokens": 726, "cache_read_tokens": 25208, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938", "0001193125-25-137449", "0001193125-25-138510", "0001193125-25-139153" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f2f2eee0825795f8b79bb76d.json", "detail_js": "details/f2f2eee0825795f8b79bb76d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f2f2eee0825795f8b79bb76d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/45824e147c224669aefbabd192a8bf18.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b2bafdccec7248dca744497776e29bfd.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7e677827b065a989e9309363", "question_id": "Q033", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "How many permanent, full-time employees did Morningstar, Inc. have as of December 31, 2024, and what proportion worked in India and the United States?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Morningstar, Inc. had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world, with approximately 41% working in India and 30% in the United States.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the provided dataset and tool query results, there is **insufficient evidence** to determine the number of permanent, full-time employees Morningstar, Inc. had as of December 31, 2024, or the proportion that worked in India and the United States. \n\nMorningstar, Inc.'s relevant annual report (Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, CIK 0001288776) was not located within the queried files before the tool budget was exhausted.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence states 11,085 permanent, full-time employees as of December 31, 2024. The candidate abstained, saying the filing was not located, so it gives none of the required figures (headcount, roughly 41% India, roughly 30% US). The question was answerable, so abstention earns no correctness credit. For citation support, the tool outputs do show no matching filing was found, so the candidate's statement that evidence was not located is consistent with the tool trace. However, the CIK 0001288776 and the 10-K identification were not established by any tool output, and the searches were guesses based on that CIK, so those specifics are unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0277825, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.026842500000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.00094, "wall_seconds": 29.83874330099934, "api_seconds": 28.722732337000707, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 38510, "completion_tokens": 1336, "reasoning_tokens": 319, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-015654", "0001193125-25-015870", "0001493152-25-001706", "0001493152-25-001708", "0001493152-25-004500" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7e677827b065a989e9309363.json", "detail_js": "details/7e677827b065a989e9309363.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7e677827b065a989e9309363.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/259261c55e9d4edba349191282bd1728.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f2f5f9e23bc0475ab6cfc9ee35b9fbc7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b16d3904b5dd0871fb6fc682", "question_id": "Q033", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many permanent, full-time employees did Morningstar, Inc. have as of December 31, 2024, and what proportion worked in India and the United States?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Morningstar, Inc. had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world, with approximately 41% working in India and 30% in the United States.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches conducted within the available filings and the tool budget limit:\n\nThe relevant annual report (Form 10-K) for **Morningstar, Inc.** for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, was not located within the queried files/iterations before exhausting the tool budget (the initial CIK search mapped to Extra Space Storage Inc. rather than Morningstar, Inc.). \n\nTherefore, there is **insufficient evidence** in the returned filing data to state how many permanent, full-time employees Morningstar, Inc. had as of December 31, 2024, or the proportions working in India and the United States.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer gives 11,085 permanent, full-time employees as of Dec 31, 2024, with about 41% in India and 30% in the US. The candidate abstained, saying insufficient evidence was found. The reference is answerable, so abstention cannot earn full correctness, and the candidate provides no numbers at all, so it is scored 0. Citation support is scored on the tool evidence alone: the candidate's statement that the search mapped to Extra Space Storage rather than Morningstar is accurate, and the tool outputs do show the CIK search returned Extra Space Storage (CIK 0001289490) and that the Morningstar 10-K was not located, so its description of the evidence is fully supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.031998650000000003, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03081975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011789, "wall_seconds": 30.31125545100076, "api_seconds": 28.554135495998707, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48147, "completion_tokens": 947, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 14000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001628280-25-006533", "0001628280-25-006535", "0001628280-25-006537", "0001628280-25-006539", "0001628280-25-006541", "0001628280-25-006543", "0001628280-25-007741", "0001628280-25-009060", "0001628280-25-009124" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b16d3904b5dd0871fb6fc682.json", "detail_js": "details/b16d3904b5dd0871fb6fc682.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b16d3904b5dd0871fb6fc682.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/21ba74fa11e440f2ac6b9804004ce7d4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f9d4af89cd354983a641b4acad33c635.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1b1288219ed83900135d9f1b", "question_id": "Q033", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "How many permanent, full-time employees did Morningstar, Inc. have as of December 31, 2024, and what proportion worked in India and the United States?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Morningstar, Inc. had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world, with approximately 41% working in India and 30% in the United States.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Morningstar, Inc. reported **11,085 permanent, full-time employees** worldwide as of December 31, 2024. Approximately **41% worked in India** and **30% in the United States**.\n\nApplying those approximate shares to the total: India ≈ **4,545 employees** (11,085 × 0.41); United States ≈ **3,326 employees** (11,085 × 0.30).\n\n**Evidence:** Morningstar’s 2024 annual report, filing `0001289419-25-000062`, file `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`, SQL text result at the match for “permanent”: it states the total and the regional percentages. The resulting employee counts are approximate because the reported percentages are rounded.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's headline figures match the reference: 11,085 permanent, full-time employees as of December 31, 2024, with about 41% in India and 30% in the United States. The derived counts are arithmetically correct (11,085 × 0.41 ≈ 4,545; 11,085 × 0.30 ≈ 3,326, rounded from 3,325.5) and are correctly flagged as approximate because the percentages are rounded. The answer is complete. The cited accession 0001289419-25-000062 and the quoted passage are supported by the tool output from the parsed 2025-03 file, which contains the exact sentence with 11,085, 41% India, and 30% US. The reference's gold evidence names accession 0001289419-25-000041 instead, so the candidate's source differs from the gold citation. That does not make the candidate's citation unsupported by its own tool evidence, but it is a minor discrepancy. The candidate also adds regional detail beyond the reference, which is accurate but not required.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00241645, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00120985, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012066, "wall_seconds": 22.719784535000144, "api_seconds": 21.399351966998438, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28540, "completion_tokens": 1517, "reasoning_tokens": 615, "cache_read_tokens": 14815, "excerpt_characters": 3500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012209", "0001104659-25-027795", "0001104659-25-027796", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000003", "0001289419-25-000005", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000009", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000015", "0001289419-25-000017", "0001289419-25-000019", "0001289419-25-000022", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000027", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000043", "0001289419-25-000049", "0001289419-25-000053", "0001289419-25-000055", "0001289419-25-000058", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001921094-25-000092" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/1b1288219ed83900135d9f1b.json", "detail_js": "details/1b1288219ed83900135d9f1b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1b1288219ed83900135d9f1b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ff6f1c35e2414f4aa8f76030d0a29d55.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8dd10564e01f46beb8c6cd80a6b8511a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "07f967ee769f856ff06fddd3", "question_id": "Q033", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "How many permanent, full-time employees did Morningstar, Inc. have as of December 31, 2024, and what proportion worked in India and the United States?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Morningstar, Inc. had 11,085 permanent, full-time employees around the world, with approximately 41% working in India and 30% in the United States.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Morningstar had **11,085 permanent, full-time employees** as of December 31, 2024. About **41% worked in India** and **30% in the United States**.\n\nThe filing gives approximate proportions, not exact country headcounts. Applying those percentages to 11,085 gives estimates of **about 4,545 employees in India** (11,085 × 41%) and **about 3,326 in the U.S.** (11,085 × 30%).\n\n**Source:** Morningstar 2025 proxy statement, file stem `0001193125-25-067151`, file `sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet`, passage at character offsets 28,360–40,360.", "correctness": 93, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same headcount (11,085) and the same shares (about 41% India, 30% United States) as the reference, and the figures match the tool-returned passage. Its derived estimates are arithmetically correct (11,085 × 0.41 ≈ 4,545; 11,085 × 0.30 ≈ 3,326 after rounding 3,325.5 up) and are clearly labeled as approximations. The source it cites (proxy file stem 0001193125-25-067151, sfd-v1-2025-03.parquet, offsets 28,360–40,360) matches the read_filing output exactly, and the quoted passage is in that output. The reference instead cites accession 0001289419-25-000041, which the tool evidence does not show containing this text, so that difference lowers correctness slightly rather than the candidate's citation support. The minor deduction reflects the extra derived numbers and the document-type difference from the reference.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003710745, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001798745, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001912, "wall_seconds": 28.215955564999604, "api_seconds": 27.001700720000372, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40857, "completion_tokens": 1547, "reasoning_tokens": 769, "cache_read_tokens": 15487, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012209", "0001104659-25-027796", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000003", "0001289419-25-000005", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000009", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000015", "0001289419-25-000017", "0001289419-25-000019", "0001289419-25-000022", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000027", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000043", "0001289419-25-000053", "0001289419-25-000058", "0001921094-25-000092" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/07f967ee769f856ff06fddd3.json", "detail_js": "details/07f967ee769f856ff06fddd3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/07f967ee769f856ff06fddd3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1ce3e9a3c25c429e9e5ca8cfec70e178.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d30cb27ca09749899cc2235de84446f5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8d9cdbc417054333b70f5a3f", "question_id": "Q034", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the search results and available filing data, the relevant 2024 annual report (Form 10-K) for Exelon Corporation (CIK `0001161728`, filing accession `0000950170-25-026262` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified. However, because the tool budget was exhausted before the detailed financial statements inside the filing could be extracted, the evidence is insufficient to report the exact figures for Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Electric operating revenues of $21,338M and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782M for FY2024. The candidate abstained and reported neither figure, so it is incomplete and earns little credit. Abstention would merit full credit only if the question were unanswerable, which it is not. For citation_support, the tool outputs do support the candidate's identification of the filing (accession 0000950170-25-026262, CIK 0001161728, sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet) and the OOM/binder errors. However, nothing in the tool evidence shows that the 'tool budget was exhausted'. The candidate also ignores that the same file_stem maps to a second accession (0000061339) in the results, and that the parsed text was never read, so its evidence-sufficiency claim is only partly grounded.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0430212, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0416745, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013467, "wall_seconds": 33.17808602100013, "api_seconds": 32.09865218699997, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 61133, "completion_tokens": 1580, "reasoning_tokens": 473, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000093751-25-000293", "0000799295-25-000008", "0000922224-25-000002", "0000929638-25-000019", "0000929638-25-000042", "0000930413-25-000115", "0000950170-25-001452", "0000950170-25-001466", "0000950170-25-001472", "0000950170-25-001475", "0000950170-25-001478", "0000950170-25-001731", "0000950170-25-001737", "0000950170-25-001740", "0000950170-25-001742", "0000950170-25-001745", "0000950170-25-026262", "0000950170-25-026265", "0000950170-25-026377", "0000950170-25-050955", "0000950170-25-050960", "0000950170-25-065302", "0000950170-25-065305", "0000950170-25-073194", "0000950170-25-076153", "0001104659-25-007834", "0001193125-25-001892", "0001193125-25-011499", "0001193125-25-013382", "0001213900-25-001215", "0001213900-25-004491", "0001477932-25-000165", "0001539497-25-000085", "0001539497-25-000119", "0001539497-25-000153", "0001741773-25-000009", "0001761054-25-000001", "0001916232-25-000004", "0001929381-25-000003", "0001999371-25-000470" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8d9cdbc417054333b70f5a3f.json", "detail_js": "details/8d9cdbc417054333b70f5a3f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8d9cdbc417054333b70f5a3f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/df5873da2ad34b3e80a9be59f4ce3594.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/834d8df90c4048c798e69d91c5f39452.request.json" }, { "task_id": "68131914bf2fc8cc1e1de4ab", "question_id": "Q034", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the data retrieved, the relevant joint 2024 Form 10-K filing for Exelon Corporation (CIK `0001109357`) was identified under filing accession / `file_stem`: **`0001109357-25-000043`** in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. \n\nHowever, because this joint filing contains duplicate entries across multiple registrant CIKs (`0000078100`, `0001135971`, `0000008192`, `0000009466`, `0000079732`, `0000022606`, `0001109357`, `0000027879`), tool calls querying the filing text encountered system constraints (`Duplicate filing accession/ID in source` and DuckDB memory limits when scanning full Markdown columns), exhausting the tool budget before the specific Consolidated Statements of Operations table entries for fiscal year 2024 Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues could be extracted.\n\nTherefore, the evidence is insufficient within the available budget to provide the exact numerical revenue figures.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Electric operating revenues of $21,338M and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782M for FY2024 under accession 0001109357-25-000043. The candidate gives neither figure and abstains, citing tool constraints. Because the reference is answerable, the abstention is not a correct response, so correctness is low. The candidate does correctly identify the accession and file, and its description of the duplicate-accession, duplicate-ID, and out-of-memory errors matches the tool outputs. It makes no unsupported numerical claims. However, its statement that the tool budget was exhausted is not clearly shown in the tool log, which records errors and partial scans rather than a budget limit. Citation support is moderate because the cited identifiers and errors are grounded, but the answer itself contains no sourced figures.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0348562, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0337815, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010747, "wall_seconds": 33.0107155200003, "api_seconds": 31.737094498997976, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48109, "completion_tokens": 1536, "reasoning_tokens": 294, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001104659-25-044095", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078", "0001109357-25-000110", "0001109357-25-000113", "0001109357-25-000118", "0001868275-25-000011", "0001868275-25-000023", "0001868275-25-000044" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/68131914bf2fc8cc1e1de4ab.json", "detail_js": "details/68131914bf2fc8cc1e1de4ab.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/68131914bf2fc8cc1e1de4ab.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f88d66c64f1d4594b89d27b1802eeedb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f960c47df6dc4ce7880fa1044de73bfd.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6ba51cf3ce04ab7cfc4a1c4e", "question_id": "Q034", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the revenue figures from the available filing data. The likely Exelon annual-report filing IDs returned a duplicate-filing error when I tried to read their text, so I can’t provide reliable amounts or cite supporting passages.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (accession 0001109357-25-000043, Consolidated Statements of Operations) gives Electric operating revenues of $21,338M and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782M for fiscal 2024. The candidate gives neither figure and abstains, but the abstention is not justified because the question is answerable. The candidate's claim that the filing reads returned a duplicate-filing error is supported by the tool outputs (the 'Duplicate filing ID in source' errors for 0001109357-25-000043 and -000041). However, the same tool output shows that 0001109357-25-000043 exists in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet with multiple rows, and the candidate did not try read_filing or another retrieval path before giving up. Its statements about the tool failures are accurate, but it does not support any answer to the question, so correctness is 0.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00270873, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00157223, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011365, "wall_seconds": 34.73942388599971, "api_seconds": 33.542399846997796, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40480, "completion_tokens": 1702, "reasoning_tokens": 648, "cache_read_tokens": 26008, "excerpt_characters": 300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001980", "0000902219-25-000057", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-014723", "0001104659-25-015142", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-033389", "0001104659-25-044095", "0001109357-25-000018", "0001109357-25-000020", "0001109357-25-000022", "0001109357-25-000024", "0001109357-25-000026", "0001109357-25-000028", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000080", "0001109357-25-000082", "0001109357-25-000084", "0001109357-25-000086", "0001109357-25-000088", "0001109357-25-000092", "0001109357-25-000094", "0001109357-25-000096", "0001109357-25-000103", "0001109357-25-000105", "0001109357-25-000110", "0001109357-25-000113", "0001109357-25-000118", "0001109357-25-000122", "0001109357-25-000136", "0001109357-25-000142", "0002052113-25-001496", "9999999995-25-001038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/6ba51cf3ce04ab7cfc4a1c4e.json", "detail_js": "details/6ba51cf3ce04ab7cfc4a1c4e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6ba51cf3ce04ab7cfc4a1c4e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/01c80c099d534820afb3bfb13725b9ad.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1e4b8bb775be4b0184ffded55baabda6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "07830dfa1987b9f985d8f2a5", "question_id": "Q034", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Exelon Corporation's Electric operating revenues and Natural gas operating revenues in fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million in fiscal year 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the two revenue amounts from the returned evidence. The filing metadata identified candidate Exelon filings, but attempts to read their contents failed because the source reported duplicate filing accessions.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 0, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference states Electric operating revenues of $21,338 million and Natural gas operating revenues of $1,782 million for FY2024, and the gold evidence quotes these figures from accession 0001109357-25-000043. The candidate abstains, claiming it cannot determine the amounts. The reference is answerable, so abstention does not earn credit. The tool evidence shows the candidate located the relevant filing (0001109357-25-000043 appears in the duckdb results with a large char_count) but all read attempts errored with duplicate-accession errors, and the candidate did not retrieve the figures. The candidate's account of the failure (duplicate accession errors) matches the tool outputs, but the tool evidence does not contain the revenue figures, so the candidate's claim is supported only as a description of its failed attempts, not as an answer. Correctness is 0 because the answer is not provided and is wrong by omission against an answerable reference.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00280333, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00199313, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008102, "wall_seconds": 33.61229975400056, "api_seconds": 31.807640990997243, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 41100, "completion_tokens": 1158, "reasoning_tokens": 240, "cache_read_tokens": 23738, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001980", "0000902219-25-000057", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-014723", "0001104659-25-015142", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001109357-25-000002", "0001109357-25-000004", "0001109357-25-000006", "0001109357-25-000008", "0001109357-25-000010", "0001109357-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000014", "0001109357-25-000016", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/07830dfa1987b9f985d8f2a5.json", "detail_js": "details/07830dfa1987b9f985d8f2a5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/07830dfa1987b9f985d8f2a5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a319444a9c094e1d91a922d233c47835.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dda406d6203343559a3ef59382b35d1e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fffaefa5d62763c235fe409b", "question_id": "Q035", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for Purchased transportation and related services?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported Purchased transportation and related services expenses of $13,719,935 thousand ($13.72 billion) in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches performed within the provided dataset files (`sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` through `sfd-v1-2025-06.parquet`), filings for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CIK 0001043729) were not located within the tool and memory budget. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence in the accessible dataset records to determine C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for \"Purchased transportation and related services\" for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 15, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (accession 0001043277-25-000012, MD&A overview table) shows Purchased transportation and related services of 13,719,935 in thousands for 2024. The candidate abstained, which earns no correctness credit because the question has a supported answer. The abstention came from the candidate's own search error. It queried CIK 0001043729, while the filer's accession prefix in the gold evidence is 0001043277, so its empty results reflect the wrong identifier, not the absence of filings. The tool outputs show only that the wrong-CIK queries returned nothing and that some queries ran out of memory. They do not support the conclusion that the company's cost data is unavailable in the dataset, so citation support is low.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0313542, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.030297, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010572, "wall_seconds": 32.12024378800015, "api_seconds": 31.1079657329974, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 41953, "completion_tokens": 1803, "reasoning_tokens": 438, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fffaefa5d62763c235fe409b.json", "detail_js": "details/fffaefa5d62763c235fe409b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fffaefa5d62763c235fe409b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3eda60a5fe734689a64c1f5cb54d8abd.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fe6df87002a043b19594378c51824d6d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a7f40311967bb280d1faff1f", "question_id": "Q035", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for Purchased transportation and related services?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported Purchased transportation and related services expenses of $13,719,935 thousand ($13.72 billion) in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "In fiscal year 2024, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for **Purchased transportation and related services** was **$13,719,935 thousand** (or approximately **$13.72 billion**).\n\n---\n\n### Source & Evidence\n* **Filing**: Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024\n* **Company**: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CIK: `0001043277`)\n* **Accession / File Stem**: `0001043277-25-000012`\n* **File ID**: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`\n\nFrom the **Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income** (and Item 7, *Consolidated Results of Operations*):\n* **Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024**:\n * **Revenues**:\n * Transportation: $16,353,745 thousand\n * Sourcing: $1,371,211 thousand\n * Total revenues: $17,724,956 thousand\n * **Costs and expenses**:\n * **Purchased transportation and related services**: **$13,719,935 thousand** ($13,719,935,000)\n * Purchased products sourced for resale: $1,240,007 thousand\n * Personnel expenses: $1,456,249 thousand\n * Other selling, general, and administrative expenses: $639,624 thousand\n * Total costs and expenses: $17,055,815 thousand", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives $13,719,935 thousand (about $13.72 billion) for 2024 Purchased transportation and related services, matching the reference and the gold quote. Its other figures (transportation and sourcing revenue, total revenues, purchased products, personnel, other SG&A, total costs) all appear in the tool output from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the MD&A table. The accession number and file ID match the tool results. The only minor unsupported detail is the 'Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024' label, which is reasonably inferred from the 'Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024' headers but not stated verbatim in the retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05010425, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04712775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0029765, "wall_seconds": 30.883587330999944, "api_seconds": 28.987113972996667, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 84422, "completion_tokens": 1636, "reasoning_tokens": 517, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a7f40311967bb280d1faff1f.json", "detail_js": "details/a7f40311967bb280d1faff1f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a7f40311967bb280d1faff1f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c296bd12680c420eb0ea855ef3827099.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c29b5f9753c440bebafb2c5901afa03e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "371b70bdabc31181a0b17d85", "question_id": "Q035", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for Purchased transportation and related services?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported Purchased transportation and related services expenses of $13,719,935 thousand ($13.72 billion) in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported **$13,719,935 thousand**—about **$13.72 billion**—for Purchased transportation and related services in fiscal 2024. The filing’s table is in thousands.\n\nEvidence: 2025 Form 8-K, file_stem `0001043277-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, passage at character offset 31,900: the Purchased transportation row shows **13,719,935** in the fiscal-year 2024 column.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure of $13,719,935 thousand (about $13.72 billion) matches the reference, and the arithmetic and unit conversion are correct. The tool output (offset 31,900 of 0001043277-25-000004) shows the row value 13719935 alongside 13886024 for the prior year, which supports the FY2024 figure. The citation is to a different accession than the gold evidence (0001043277-25-000012), but the 8-K earnings release reports the same number, so it is a valid source. Two claims are not directly shown in the tool output: that the value sits in the 'fiscal-year 2024 column' (the passage contains no column headers) and that the table is 'in thousands' (no units statement appears in the retrieved passage). The core value is well supported, so the score is reduced only for these unverified details.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0023501, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001189, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011611, "wall_seconds": 22.411541698000292, "api_seconds": 20.691019070996845, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27864, "completion_tokens": 1410, "reasoning_tokens": 531, "cache_read_tokens": 14195, "excerpt_characters": 2700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000019", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/371b70bdabc31181a0b17d85.json", "detail_js": "details/371b70bdabc31181a0b17d85.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/371b70bdabc31181a0b17d85.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/86cda713404c409d9b8e932719857b3a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cd4e6026e55e406a81bbbd168e8366cc.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a9ca089ec43929e84469ab36", "question_id": "Q035", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s cost for Purchased transportation and related services?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. reported Purchased transportation and related services expenses of $13,719,935 thousand ($13.72 billion) in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "C.H. Robinson’s cost for **Purchased transportation and related services** in fiscal 2024 was **$13,719,935 thousand**, or **$13.719935 billion**. The filing presents the amount for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, in thousands. \n**Source:** Form 10-K, file stem `0001043277-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, passage beginning at character offset 31,297.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's value of 13,719,935 thousand matches the reference, and its conversion to $13.719935 billion is arithmetically correct. The period (twelve months ended December 31, 2024) and units (thousands) are stated correctly. The cited passage in the tool output (file stem 0001043277-25-000004, offset 31,297) contains the table row 'Purchased transportation and related services | ... | 13719935 | 13886024 | (1.2)%' under the Twelve Months 2024 column, so the claim is directly supported. The gold evidence cites a different accession (0001043277-25-000012), but citation_support is scored only against the tool evidence, which supports the candidate. The small deduction reflects that the tool passage was truncated before the Item 7 overview table the gold cites, so the candidate's source is correct but not the same locator as the gold.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002921495, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001473295, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014482, "wall_seconds": 18.398174072000984, "api_seconds": 17.814209452000796, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28908, "completion_tokens": 1248, "reasoning_tokens": 487, "cache_read_tokens": 8887, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a9ca089ec43929e84469ab36.json", "detail_js": "details/a9ca089ec43929e84469ab36.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a9ca089ec43929e84469ab36.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a5fb082b82164de281e359237841a79a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/902dfb45dd114be595a8c1d71e8486fe.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e2ba6225b507eec66c5c2827", "question_id": "Q036", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Utz Brands, Inc.'s Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc. reported Selling and distribution expenses of $306,151 thousand and Administrative expenses of $129,642 thousand, totaling $435,793 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Utz Brands, Inc.'s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 (file stem `0001739566-25-000053`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses were:\n\n* **Selling and distribution expenses:** **$306,151 thousand** (or **$306,151,000**)\n* **Administrative expenses:** **$129,642 thousand** (or **$129,642,000**)\n\nTogether, these comprise **Total selling, distribution, and administrative expenses** of **$435,793 thousand** ($306,151 + $129,642).\n\n---\n### Comparison:\n* **Difference:** Selling and distribution expenses exceeded Administrative expenses by **$176,509 thousand** ($306,151 thousand − $129,642 thousand).\n* **Ratio / Proportion:** Selling and distribution expenses accounted for **70.25%** ($306,151 / $435,793) of total selling, distribution, and administrative expenses, while Administrative expenses accounted for **29.75%** ($129,642 / $435,793).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the gold quote: Selling and distribution $306,151K, Administrative $129,642K, total $435,793K, all for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024. The arithmetic checks out: the sum is 435,793, the difference is 176,509, and the shares are 70.25% and 29.75%. Units (thousands) are stated correctly, and the candidate also gives the full-dollar equivalents. The tool output contains the Consolidated Statements of Operations row with these exact values, scoped to accession 0001739566-25-000053 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, so the citations are supported. The minor deduction is that the candidate does not explicitly cite the statement's period header, although the tool output shows it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.028766, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.027597, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001169, "wall_seconds": 38.21751223300089, "api_seconds": 36.60404154499702, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40111, "completion_tokens": 1675, "reasoning_tokens": 336, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000019617-25-000261", "0000950170-25-020547", "0001104659-25-012147", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001415889-25-002885", "0001415889-25-002919", "0001609864-25-000003", "0001739566-25-000049", "0001739566-25-000053", "0001871546-25-000002" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/e2ba6225b507eec66c5c2827.json", "detail_js": "details/e2ba6225b507eec66c5c2827.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e2ba6225b507eec66c5c2827.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a4fcf3594e57463097212d3ebf87ae42.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/318a5a78f2584338bd5f6543810472ea.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1241a79aeffb275f84ff363f", "question_id": "Q036", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Utz Brands, Inc.'s Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc. reported Selling and distribution expenses of $306,151 thousand and Administrative expenses of $129,642 thousand, totaling $435,793 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Utz Brands, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 (file stem `0001739566-25-000053`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 7 *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*):\n\nFor the **fiscal year ended December 29, 2024**, Selling, distribution and administrative expenses were broken down as follows:\n\n* **Selling and distribution expenses:** **$306,151 thousand** (or **$306.151 million**)\n* **Administrative expenses:** **$129,642 thousand** (or **$129.642 million**)\n\n### Comparison / Breakdown:\n* **Selling and distribution expenses** exceeded **Administrative expenses** by **$176,509 thousand** (or **$176.509 million**), or approximately **2.36 times** Administrative expenses.\n* **Total Selling, distribution, and administrative expenses:** **$435,793 thousand** ($306,151 thousand + $129,642 thousand, or **$435.793 million**). \n * Selling and distribution represented **70.25%** of the total.\n * Administrative expenses represented **29.75%** of the total.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core figures match the reference and the tool evidence: Selling and distribution $306,151K, Administrative $129,642K, and total $435,793K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024. The derived difference ($176,509K), ratio (about 2.36x), and total check are also correct. The only flaw is minor rounding in the percentage split: 306,151/435,793 is about 70.26%, not 70.25%, so the administrative share is about 29.74%, not 29.75%. The units (thousands, with $306.151M equivalents) are correct. The citation to accession 0001739566-25-000053 and the MD&A/Item 7 section is supported by the read_filing output, which contains the exact statement table and the MD&A discussion of the same figures.", "known_cost_usd": 0.043677099999999996, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0413535, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0023236, "wall_seconds": 34.79612392499985, "api_seconds": 32.48198546700041, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 70184, "completion_tokens": 1638, "reasoning_tokens": 508, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000019617-25-000261", "0000950170-25-020547", "0001104659-25-012147", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001415889-25-002885", "0001415889-25-002919", "0001609864-25-000003", "0001739566-25-000049", "0001739566-25-000053", "0001871546-25-000002" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1241a79aeffb275f84ff363f.json", "detail_js": "details/1241a79aeffb275f84ff363f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1241a79aeffb275f84ff363f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4a3150ca7f3c47f9bea11956de5fb369.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2a866d155cd94ab6829981c65d9439ec.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b2b30f11b1f0c09bb1e93269", "question_id": "Q036", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What were Utz Brands, Inc.'s Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc. reported Selling and distribution expenses of $306,151 thousand and Administrative expenses of $129,642 thousand, totaling $435,793 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the relevant Utz Brands filing in the available Parquet data, so I can’t reliably report the Selling and distribution or Administrative expense amounts. My CIK-based metadata searches returned no matching filings, and a broader text search failed.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Selling and distribution of 306,151 and Administrative of 129,642 (thousands) for the year ended December 29, 2024. The candidate abstains and gives none of these figures, so it is wrong on the core question. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which this one is not. For citation support, the tool outputs do back the candidate's narrower statements: the accession-filtered queries returned no rows, and the broad 'utz brands' text search hit an out-of-memory error. Support is partial, not full, because the candidate calls the accession queries 'CIK-based' when they filtered on accession prefixes, and the search never reached the filings that contain the target table.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00205367, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00120677, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008469, "wall_seconds": 28.25995201600017, "api_seconds": 27.47355089499615, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27477, "completion_tokens": 1482, "reasoning_tokens": 488, "cache_read_tokens": 17082, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/b2b30f11b1f0c09bb1e93269.json", "detail_js": "details/b2b30f11b1f0c09bb1e93269.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b2b30f11b1f0c09bb1e93269.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/db49af16621f460c90e356a366cd75c5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2793d0d4d1f445aa89c5a42760e39aea.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d18291409d721e2602dd836b", "question_id": "Q036", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What were Utz Brands, Inc.'s Selling and distribution expenses versus Administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc. reported Selling and distribution expenses of $306,151 thousand and Administrative expenses of $129,642 thousand, totaling $435,793 thousand for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t locate Utz Brands’ 2024 10-K in the available Parquet files, so I can’t verify the expense amounts from the provided sources. The metadata lookup for Utz’s company CIK returned no filings, and the issuer searches did not find a 10-K.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 35, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Selling and distribution $306,151K, Administrative $129,642K, and total $435,793K for the year ended December 29, 2024. The candidate abstains and provides none of these figures, so it earns little correctness credit. Its abstention is not justified as the reference is answerable. The tool evidence also does not fully support the candidate's claims. Every search returned `complete: false` after scanning only 500 rows, so the claim that issuer searches 'did not find a 10-K' overstates what was checked. The CIK-based queries used prefix 1739564, while the gold accession is 0001739566, so the lookup appears to have used the wrong identifier. The candidate's statement that it could not locate the filing is partly supported, but its stated reasons are not.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001935125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001047025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008881, "wall_seconds": 29.076060594999944, "api_seconds": 27.184042619997854, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26871, "completion_tokens": 1439, "reasoning_tokens": 658, "cache_read_tokens": 17390, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d18291409d721e2602dd836b.json", "detail_js": "details/d18291409d721e2602dd836b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d18291409d721e2602dd836b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/da0d20b059fd459ab133c88d386a8b1e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/613db705a78143139181b1d5d6d53e5d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "12692d7ce69f6db6c3a3e28a", "question_id": "Q037", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Sabre Corporation's revenues for its two business segments, Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Sabre Corporation reported Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions revenue of $326,819 thousand.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved evidence from Sabre Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0001597033-25-000027`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n- Sabre Corporation confirms operating in two business segments:\n 1. **Travel Solutions**\n 2. **Hospitality Solutions**\n- The filing notes that segment financial information is reported in *Note 19. Segment Information* to the consolidated financial statements (Item 8).\n\nHowever, because the tool query budget was exhausted before retrieving the table in Note 19 or Item 7 showing the segment revenue breakdown, the retrieved evidence is **insufficient** to state the exact revenue dollar figures for Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions in fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the segment revenue table in the filing gives Travel Solutions $2,744,844K and Hospitality Solutions $326,819K. The candidate abstains and gives no figures, so it fails the core question. Missing evidence does not excuse this, and the abstention is not justified because the answer was available. Citation support is moderate. The candidate's supported claims are the filing identity, the two segment names, and the Note 19 cross-reference, all of which appear in the tool outputs. However, its claim that the tool query budget was exhausted appears nowhere in the tool evidence, and the retrieved snippets never show the revenue table, so the reason it gives for abstaining is unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0324693, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0313575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011118, "wall_seconds": 42.00822264100134, "api_seconds": 39.882032937002805, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 45873, "completion_tokens": 1411, "reasoning_tokens": 291, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/12692d7ce69f6db6c3a3e28a.json", "detail_js": "details/12692d7ce69f6db6c3a3e28a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/12692d7ce69f6db6c3a3e28a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e10214db16294160873842ae2d7ac0b5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0dc055d5c48e42379d4030bbdbb9a3c9.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7bf6be5639f6b756154e1ae2", "question_id": "Q037", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Sabre Corporation's revenues for its two business segments, Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Sabre Corporation reported Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions revenue of $326,819 thousand.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches conducted within the available filings, Sabre Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 was identified (Accession Number / `file_stem`: `0001597033-25-000027`, located in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). \n\nHowever, because the tool budget was exhausted before locating and retrieving the specific segment revenue disclosure tables (e.g., within \"Note 19. Segment Information\" or the Segment Results section in MD&A), the evidence returned is **insufficient** to provide the exact fiscal year 2024 revenue figures for the Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions segments.", "correctness": 12, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Travel Solutions $2,744,844K and Hospitality Solutions $326,819K for FY2024. The candidate abstained and gave no segment revenue figures, so it misses the core answer. It does correctly identify the right filing (accession 0001597033-25-000027, 10-K, period ending 2024-12-31), which the tool output supports. Its claim that the retrieved evidence is insufficient is consistent with the tool outputs, which never returned the segment table. The statement that the tool budget was exhausted is not directly shown in the tool evidence, which lowers citation support slightly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0356562, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.034479, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011772, "wall_seconds": 43.00765319800121, "api_seconds": 40.14756745499835, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 50634, "completion_tokens": 1422, "reasoning_tokens": 312, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7bf6be5639f6b756154e1ae2.json", "detail_js": "details/7bf6be5639f6b756154e1ae2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7bf6be5639f6b756154e1ae2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4ea05ea9b14e4cdfb0c6428c1c756a74.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d534f4db4b0c42c985fe33196cb122ef.request.json" }, { "task_id": "96f200b00cc66f74681f433a", "question_id": "Q037", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Sabre Corporation's revenues for its two business segments, Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Sabre Corporation reported Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions revenue of $326,819 thousand.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Sabre reported **fiscal 2024 total segment revenue** of:\n\n- **Travel Solutions:** **$2,744.844 million** (including $42.098 million in intersegment revenue)\n- **Hospitality Solutions:** **$326.819 million**\n\nThe 10-K presents these figures in thousands. Revenue from external customers was $2,702.746 million for Travel Solutions and $326.819 million for Hospitality Solutions.\n\n**Source:** Sabre Corporation 2024 Form 10-K, accession/file_stem `0001597033-25-000027`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, segment-information table near character offset 486,000.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference after unit conversion: $2,744.844 million equals $2,744,844 thousand for Travel Solutions total revenue, and $326.819 million equals $326,819 thousand for Hospitality Solutions. The candidate correctly states the 10-K reports in thousands. Its extra breakdown is internally consistent: $2,702.746M external plus $42.098M intersegment equals $2,744.844M, and the tool output's segment table shows these same values. The candidate cites the segment-information table near offset 486,000, which the tool output supports. It does not cite the MD&A table quoted in the gold evidence, a minor difference, since the same figures appear in the retrieved Note 19 table. Small deduction for the reference's headline figure being the unadjusted total rather than the candidate's emphasized framing, though the candidate reports both.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0027759, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0015236, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012523, "wall_seconds": 34.612578066000424, "api_seconds": 32.27316305700333, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41452, "completion_tokens": 1405, "reasoning_tokens": 377, "cache_read_tokens": 24820, "excerpt_characters": 6400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/96f200b00cc66f74681f433a.json", "detail_js": "details/96f200b00cc66f74681f433a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/96f200b00cc66f74681f433a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8e22d9eafcd7457a9caef12c5416770a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9e9eae5ff1d744129fb24464ff181f16.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3d95e9437f85ac9b672b9906", "question_id": "Q037", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what were Sabre Corporation's revenues for its two business segments, Travel Solutions and Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "In fiscal year 2024, Sabre Corporation reported Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions revenue of $326,819 thousand.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the two segment revenue amounts from the returned evidence. The filing identified as Sabre Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K says its segment financial information is in Note 19, but the passages returned did not include that information or the revenue figures.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives Travel Solutions $2,744,844 thousand and Hospitality Solutions $326,819 thousand for FY2024, supported by the gold quote from the segment results table. The candidate instead abstains, saying the revenue figures could not be found. The reference is answerable, so abstention cannot earn credit, and the candidate provides no figures. Its citation_support is high because its statements are accurate to the tool evidence: the retrieved passages do point to Note 19 and do not contain the table, and the candidate does not fabricate numbers. The candidate also did not search the segment table text the tool surfaced (the 'hospitality solutions' position at 15137 and the later excerpt were not followed up), so the abstention is a retrieval failure rather than a justified unanswerable conclusion.", "known_cost_usd": 0.006059165, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003885665, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021735, "wall_seconds": 45.36365583999941, "api_seconds": 42.93777308699828, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 90395, "completion_tokens": 849, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 44654, "excerpt_characters": 42000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3d95e9437f85ac9b672b9906.json", "detail_js": "details/3d95e9437f85ac9b672b9906.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3d95e9437f85ac9b672b9906.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1a9849c9b42d4d758ec1c5bdc616b4f2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7383c8f202b64d13b442282cce243356.request.json" }, { "task_id": "46c8e37976818d4dd2781562", "question_id": "Q038", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what was Microsoft Corporation's Total revenue as reported on its Consolidated Income Statements?", "reference": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft Corporation reported Total revenue of $69,632 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Microsoft Corporation’s Unaudited Consolidated Income Statements in its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (Filing ID / `file_stem`: `0000950170-25-010491`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), **Total revenue** for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was:\n\n- **$69,632 million** (or **$69.632 billion**)\n\n### Breakdown of Revenue:\n- **Product revenue:** $16,219 million\n- **Service and other revenue:** $53,413 million\n- **Total revenue:** **$69,632 million** ($16,219 + $53,413 = $69,632)", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the reference: Total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was $69,632 million. The tool output's Income Statements table shows Total revenue of 69632 in that column, in millions, and the product (16,219) and service and other (53,413) figures sum correctly to 69,632. The accession 0000950170-25-010491 matches the file_stem in the retrieved header, which identifies a 10-Q with period 20241231. Minor wording issue: the source labels the statement 'INCOME STATEMENTS (Unaudited)' rather than 'Consolidated Income Statements', a small naming imprecision that does not affect the figures. The first DuckDB query failed with a binder error, but the candidate did not rely on it, and the later successful queries support every stated number.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0200193, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.018864, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011553, "wall_seconds": 35.63050716399994, "api_seconds": 34.607930184001816, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30630, "completion_tokens": 1215, "reasoning_tokens": 276, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/46c8e37976818d4dd2781562.json", "detail_js": "details/46c8e37976818d4dd2781562.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/46c8e37976818d4dd2781562.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3fc372716c054172917e2ee01655cb3d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e231ea3d51ca4a509a6bf584701d7bfb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "600923745ec4b723965ef944", "question_id": "Q038", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what was Microsoft Corporation's Total revenue as reported on its Consolidated Income Statements?", "reference": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft Corporation reported Total revenue of $69,632 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Microsoft Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (Part I, Item 1, **Income Statements**; `file_stem`: `0000950170-25-010491`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), the Total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was:\n\n- **Product revenue:** $16,219 million \n- **Service and other revenue:** $53,413 million \n- **Total revenue:** **$69,632 million** (or **$69.632 billion**)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports Total revenue of $69,632 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, which matches the reference and the gold evidence (69632 in the Income Statements). The product ($16,219M) and service and other ($53,413M) figures also match the tool output, and the $69.632 billion conversion is arithmetically correct. The cited accession, file_stem, section, and 10-Q quarter all match the tool evidence. Citation support is slightly below full because the candidate's cited file_id is taken from the search results rather than the read_filing call that returned the statement text, but the statement content it quotes is directly present in the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0215837, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015737, "wall_seconds": 26.36267295399921, "api_seconds": 25.6512617770004, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 37927, "completion_tokens": 898, "reasoning_tokens": 238, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001062993-25-004143", "0001062993-25-004146", "0001062993-25-004147", "0001062993-25-005513", "0001062993-25-005517", "0001062993-25-005518", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/600923745ec4b723965ef944.json", "detail_js": "details/600923745ec4b723965ef944.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/600923745ec4b723965ef944.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f8227ea2581b4611b42fcfe0bdb0922f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/999f2a28d58c4e95b229c4cf4a8b5c83.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d9d03a9baf672f2a0c1049d6", "question_id": "Q038", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what was Microsoft Corporation's Total revenue as reported on its Consolidated Income Statements?", "reference": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft Corporation reported Total revenue of $69,632 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Microsoft’s **Total revenue** for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was **$69,632 million** ($69.632 billion).\n\nThe filing states amounts in millions; the table reports Total revenue of 69,632 for the 2024 three-month period. Evidence: file_stem `0000950170-25-010491`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, SQL text query showing the Income Statements table.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's value of $69,632 million matches the reference and the tool output. The Income Statements table in the tool evidence shows Total revenue of 69632 for the three months ended December 31, 2024, in millions. The cited file_stem and file_id appear in the tool outputs, and the $69.632 billion conversion is arithmetically correct. The only minor gap is that the candidate's accession-based claim relies on a CIK-matched filing lookup that is shown but not explicitly tied to the company name in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0018868000000000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0010001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008867, "wall_seconds": 30.71582499000033, "api_seconds": 29.831292830996972, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 20922, "completion_tokens": 968, "reasoning_tokens": 383, "cache_read_tokens": 8980, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d9d03a9baf672f2a0c1049d6.json", "detail_js": "details/d9d03a9baf672f2a0c1049d6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d9d03a9baf672f2a0c1049d6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9ab137a5ec8f417692402433ce8f0d7d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/75ae311588ab49c7a043324f309ad195.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c6cb1f6b661407168695f007", "question_id": "Q038", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what was Microsoft Corporation's Total revenue as reported on its Consolidated Income Statements?", "reference": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft Corporation reported Total revenue of $69,632 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Microsoft reported **Total revenue of $69,632 million ($69.632 billion)** for the three months ended December 31, 2024.\n\nThe Consolidated Income Statements report amounts in millions. The table shows Total revenue of 69,632 in the 2024 column. (Filing `0000950170-25-010491`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, chars 6081–18081.)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports Total revenue of $69,632 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024, matching the reference and the gold evidence. The Income Statements table in the tool output shows 69632 in the Three Months Ended December 31, 2024 column, and the figure is stated in millions as the filing specifies. The cited filing accession and character range (6081–18081) match the read_filing output. The $69.632 billion conversion is arithmetically correct. The small deduction in citation_support is because the candidate's cited range is the broader chunk containing the table rather than the exact table span.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00374594, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0018532400000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018927, "wall_seconds": 29.27739080700121, "api_seconds": 28.200924414000838, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 47243, "completion_tokens": 790, "reasoning_tokens": 127, "cache_read_tokens": 18279, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/c6cb1f6b661407168695f007.json", "detail_js": "details/c6cb1f6b661407168695f007.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c6cb1f6b661407168695f007.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/01012520b4e0498f854f3472c712029a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7af0ffbec0ef4c05b77743e0f1b534d0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0f2c3ca9d16bf5e92de76e56", "question_id": "Q039", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, by what percentage did NIKE Brand footwear revenues decrease on a currency-neutral basis, and what drove that change?", "reference": "NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis, driven by a 7% decrease in unit sales and a reduction of approximately 5 percentage points due to lower average selling price (ASP) per pair resulting from higher discounts and channel mix changes.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NIKE, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2024 (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Accession/file_stem: `0000320187-25-000004`, Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations):\n\n### **1. Percentage Decrease**\n* For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, **NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12%** on a currency-neutral basis.\n\n---\n\n### **2. Drivers of the Change**\nThe decrease was driven by:\n* **Lower unit sales:** Unit sales of footwear decreased **7%**.\n* **Lower average selling price (ASP) per pair:** Lower ASP per pair reduced footwear revenues by approximately **5 percentage points**, primarily due to:\n * **Higher discounts**\n * **Changes in channel mix**", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports the same core figures as the reference: NIKE Brand footwear revenues down 12% on a currency-neutral basis, unit sales down 7%, and lower ASP reducing revenues by about 5 percentage points. It also correctly attributes the ASP decline to higher discounts and channel mix. The period (quarter ended November 30, 2024) and accession 0000320187-25-000004 match the header in the tool output. The MD&A passage retrieved by the tool contains the same wording, so the claims are well supported. The candidate's failed first SQL query does not affect the answer. Minor deduction only because the reference is slightly less precise about the ASP causes than the candidate's bulleted phrasing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03376125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03241725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001344, "wall_seconds": 71.92491875399901, "api_seconds": 70.22749414400096, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 50528, "completion_tokens": 1227, "reasoning_tokens": 214, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004", "0000320187-25-000008", "0000320187-25-000011", "0000320187-25-000016", "0001127602-25-001019", "0001127602-25-001021", "0001127602-25-004358", "0001127602-25-004363", "0001127602-25-004368", "0001127602-25-004373", "0001127602-25-004377", "0001127602-25-005226", "0001127602-25-005230", "0001127602-25-011755", "0001127602-25-012633", "0001959173-25-000890", "0001959173-25-000927", "0001959173-25-000978", "0001959173-25-002685", "0001959173-25-003160" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/0f2c3ca9d16bf5e92de76e56.json", "detail_js": "details/0f2c3ca9d16bf5e92de76e56.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0f2c3ca9d16bf5e92de76e56.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d6e579558db44d9fb404f4773fd12ed3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5d1fac714b03432d9a1173810928dec1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7beff914f0a354c41898565e", "question_id": "Q039", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, by what percentage did NIKE Brand footwear revenues decrease on a currency-neutral basis, and what drove that change?", "reference": "NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis, driven by a 7% decrease in unit sales and a reduction of approximately 5 percentage points due to lower average selling price (ASP) per pair resulting from higher discounts and channel mix changes.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NIKE, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2024 (second quarter of fiscal 2025; file_id: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, file_stem: `0000320187-25-000004`):\n\n### **Percentage Decrease**\n* **NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12%** on a currency-neutral basis.\n\n### **Drivers of the Change**\nThe decrease was driven by:\n1. **Lower unit sales:** Unit sales of footwear decreased **7%**.\n2. **Lower average selling price (ASP) per pair:** Lower ASP reduced footwear revenues by approximately **5 percentage points**. \n * The lower ASP per pair was primarily due to **higher discounts** and **changes in channel mix**.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all key figures: a 12% currency-neutral decline in NIKE Brand footwear revenues, a 7% unit sales decrease, and a roughly 5 percentage point impact from lower ASP per pair, attributed to higher discounts and channel mix. The arithmetic is consistent (7% volume plus 5 points of ASP is about 12%). The retrieved read_filing text directly supports every figure and driver. Minor gap: the '10-Q' form type and the 'period ended November 30, 2024' wording are inferred from the 'three months ended November 30' context rather than stated verbatim in the retrieved passage, and the candidate omits the 'partially offset by strategic pricing actions' nuance, which the reference also omits.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0322235, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.030642, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015815, "wall_seconds": 76.11421413399876, "api_seconds": 75.09972607399868, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 50586, "completion_tokens": 1217, "reasoning_tokens": 305, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004", "0000320187-25-000008", "0000320187-25-000011", "0000320187-25-000016", "0000320187-25-000020", "0000320187-25-000023", "0000320187-25-000026", "0001127602-25-004358", "0001127602-25-004363", "0001127602-25-004368", "0001127602-25-004373", "0001127602-25-005226", "0001127602-25-005230", "0001127602-25-011755", "0001127602-25-012633", "0001127602-25-014448", "0001959173-25-000890", "0001959173-25-000927", "0001959173-25-000978", "0001959173-25-002685", "0001959173-25-003160" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7beff914f0a354c41898565e.json", "detail_js": "details/7beff914f0a354c41898565e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7beff914f0a354c41898565e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/affff332d6f9498aaccefdd4f5f683ef.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/da0f61b29d674d4ab95fef361641ddf2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "963929704305bde3bf873af7", "question_id": "Q039", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, by what percentage did NIKE Brand footwear revenues decrease on a currency-neutral basis, and what drove that change?", "reference": "NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis, driven by a 7% decrease in unit sales and a reduction of approximately 5 percentage points due to lower average selling price (ASP) per pair resulting from higher discounts and channel mix changes.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NIKE Brand footwear revenue **decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis** in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Footwear unit sales fell **7%**, and lower average selling price per pair reduced revenue by about **5 percentage points**. NIKE attributed the lower average selling price primarily to **higher discounts and changes in channel mix**.\n\n**Source:** NIKE’s Q2 fiscal 2025 filing, accession `0000320187-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; “Second Quarter of Fiscal 2025 Compared to Second Quarter of Fiscal 2024” passage, SQL text evidence locating “footwear revenues” at character 107,041.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all key facts: footwear revenue down 12% on a currency-neutral basis, unit sales down 7%, and about 5 percentage points from lower ASP per pair, attributed to higher discounts and channel mix. The accession number and the Q2 fiscal 2025 period are correct. The cited passage at character 107,041 of accession 0000320187-25-000004 appears in the tool output, which contains the same sentences. Minor deduction: the candidate says 'primarily' for the ASP drivers, which mirrors the filing's wording but is slightly more emphatic than the reference's phrasing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00235754, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00126864, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010889, "wall_seconds": 69.95832892700128, "api_seconds": 68.9959458559988, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27893, "completion_tokens": 1158, "reasoning_tokens": 290, "cache_read_tokens": 12849, "excerpt_characters": 5900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004", "0000320187-25-000008", "0000320187-25-000011", "0001127602-25-001019", "0001127602-25-001021", "0001127602-25-004358", "0001127602-25-004363", "0001127602-25-004368", "0001127602-25-004373", "0001127602-25-004377", "0001127602-25-005226", "0001127602-25-005230", "0001959173-25-000890", "0001959173-25-000927", "0001959173-25-000978" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/963929704305bde3bf873af7.json", "detail_js": "details/963929704305bde3bf873af7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/963929704305bde3bf873af7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bf3741af554e456a9121592933ae36c2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a138c0a446f845a0aeb1847319670c09.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7faf9e577051229b3e5776f7", "question_id": "Q039", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, by what percentage did NIKE Brand footwear revenues decrease on a currency-neutral basis, and what drove that change?", "reference": "NIKE Brand footwear revenues decreased 12% on a currency-neutral basis, driven by a 7% decrease in unit sales and a reduction of approximately 5 percentage points due to lower average selling price (ASP) per pair resulting from higher discounts and channel mix changes.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t verify the second-quarter figure or its explanation from the available filing evidence. The NIKE filing I could confirm is for fiscal 2025’s **third quarter**, so it doesn’t answer the question about the second quarter.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold quote from accession 0000320187-25-000004 gives the Q2 FY2025 figures (footwear down 12% currency-neutral, unit sales down 7%, ASP reducing revenue by about 5 points). The tool output already listed that accession under January 2025 files, but the candidate never opened it with read_filing or searched it for the footwear language. It abstained after checking only the Q3 8-K, so the abstention is unwarranted and the answer is missing all required content (percentage and drivers). Its one substantive claim, that the confirmed filing is the fiscal Q3 release, is supported by the tool output, which earns partial citation credit. The statement that it could not verify the Q2 figure reflects an incomplete search rather than missing evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003479055, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001817455, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016616, "wall_seconds": 69.62753692799924, "api_seconds": 68.4385724169988, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 53388, "completion_tokens": 1307, "reasoning_tokens": 427, "cache_read_tokens": 30428, "excerpt_characters": 13000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000320187-25-000004", "0000320187-25-000008", "0000320187-25-000011", "0000320187-25-000016", "0001127602-25-001019", "0001127602-25-001021", "0001127602-25-004358", "0001127602-25-004363", "0001127602-25-004368", "0001127602-25-004373", "0001127602-25-004377", "0001127602-25-005226", "0001127602-25-005230", "0001127602-25-011755", "0001127602-25-012633", "0001959173-25-000890", "0001959173-25-000927", "0001959173-25-000978", "0001959173-25-002685", "0001959173-25-003160" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "other" ], "detail_json": "details/7faf9e577051229b3e5776f7.json", "detail_js": "details/7faf9e577051229b3e5776f7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7faf9e577051229b3e5776f7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b867fa00a0804e42851ffef513610fe3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/44bd46a514ee446884b874243b787ebb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b0ad9eca2711e3a75f710339", "question_id": "Q040", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated reported total QCT revenues of $10,084 million for the three months ended December 29, 2024 (comprising Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Qualcomm Incorporated's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (Filing accession: `0000804328-25-000011`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), **Note 1 (Revenues)** discloses the QCT (Qualcomm CDMA Technologies) segment revenue streams for the three months ended December 29, 2024 as follows:\n\n* **Handsets:** $7,574 million\n* **Automotive:** $961 million\n* **IoT (internet of things):** $1,549 million\n* **Total QCT revenues:** **$10,084 million** (or **$10.084 billion**)\n\n*(Arithmetic check: $7,574 + $961 + $1,549 = $10,084 million)*", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "All figures match the reference and the tool output: Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, IoT $1,549M, and Total QCT $10,084M for the three months ended December 29, 2024. The arithmetic checks out, and the accession 0000804328-25-000011 and the 10-Q period are supported by the tool output. The candidate labels the table 'Note 1 (Revenues)', but the tool output never shows a note number for the table. The surrounding text refers to segment information as 'Note 6', and the gold reference cites 'Note 7 Segment Information', so the candidate's section label is unsupported and likely wrong. This is a minor citation flaw, since the numbers themselves are correct and well supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.029371, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.028212, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001159, "wall_seconds": 31.725160654999854, "api_seconds": 29.957320901998173, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41696, "completion_tokens": 1502, "reasoning_tokens": 362, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001888316-25-000017", "0001888316-25-000018", "0001888316-25-000019", "0001888316-25-000021", "0001888316-25-000022", "0001888316-25-000023", "0001888316-25-000024", "0001888316-25-000026", "0001888316-25-000027", "0001958244-25-001235" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/b0ad9eca2711e3a75f710339.json", "detail_js": "details/b0ad9eca2711e3a75f710339.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b0ad9eca2711e3a75f710339.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ccf0da9c91194f1f9dfee588b2d52f75.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/62d0005ecb6343b79ea709d11b1a84f5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1442d452d02c93e215370252", "question_id": "Q040", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated reported total QCT revenues of $10,084 million for the three months ended December 29, 2024 (comprising Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Qualcomm Incorporated's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (File Stem: `0000804328-25-000011`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Note 2, *Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items – Revenues*), the breakdown and total for Qualcomm's QCT revenue streams were as follows:\n\n### **QCT Revenue Streams for the Three Months Ended December 29, 2024:**\n- **Handsets:** $7,574 million\n- **Automotive:** $961 million\n- **IoT (internet of things):** $1,549 million\n- **Total QCT revenues:** **$10,084 million** (or **$10.084 billion**)\n\n*(Also confirmed under Note 6, Segment Information, where QCT Segment Revenues are reported as $10,084 million).*", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the gold evidence exactly: Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, IoT $1,549M, and total QCT revenues $10,084M for the three months ended December 29, 2024. The period and accession number are correct. The candidate cites Note 2 for the revenue-stream breakdown, which the tool output supports (the QCT revenue stream table appears under Note 2). Its statement that Note 6 reports QCT revenues of $10,084M is also supported by the segment table in the tool output. Minor issues: the candidate's description of the Note 6 read was based on a search that initially failed to find 'Note 6. Segment Reporting' and then succeeded with 'Note 6', and the candidate does not cite the gold section label exactly. These do not affect correctness. The stated units and the $10.084 billion conversion are correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05198895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04964175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0023472, "wall_seconds": 34.049748856001315, "api_seconds": 31.61757952800326, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 84441, "completion_tokens": 1044, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005625" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1442d452d02c93e215370252.json", "detail_js": "details/1442d452d02c93e215370252.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1442d452d02c93e215370252.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/aca296b856c7461a9d21d03cc0cd2e31.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c9ed153768574ae5aafad869c44f130d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ec4c6c06dd58a78c06cdcd3e", "question_id": "Q040", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated reported total QCT revenues of $10,084 million for the three months ended December 29, 2024 (comprising Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Qualcomm’s total QCT revenue for the three months ended December 29, 2024 was **$10,084 million ($10.084 billion)**. The filing’s revenue-stream table lists Handsets at $7,574 million, Automotive at $961 million, and IoT at $1,549 million; these sum to $10,084 million.\n\nSource: Qualcomm filing, `file_stem` **0000804328-25-000011**, `file_id` **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**; QCT revenue-stream table.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's total QCT revenue of $10,084M for the three months ended December 29, 2024 matches the reference and the tool output table. The segment figures (Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, IoT $1,549M) also match, and they sum correctly to $10,084M. The cited file_stem (0000804328-25-000011) and file_id (sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet) are both supported by the tool results, and the table header confirms the correct period. The units ($ millions, with the billion conversion correct) are right.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001537125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0008112249999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007259, "wall_seconds": 19.047631117000492, "api_seconds": 18.52813998000056, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 15478, "completion_tokens": 729, "reasoning_tokens": 206, "cache_read_tokens": 5310, "excerpt_characters": 2200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001888316-25-000017", "0001888316-25-000024", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ec4c6c06dd58a78c06cdcd3e.json", "detail_js": "details/ec4c6c06dd58a78c06cdcd3e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ec4c6c06dd58a78c06cdcd3e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/319a0a0047be4dbba2f0710572016b4b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ee234a1d92d4062b10a1b4e95133db9.request.json" }, { "task_id": "92c3257f7e0a4c49429a6feb", "question_id": "Q040", "difficulty": "medium", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated reported total QCT revenues of $10,084 million for the three months ended December 29, 2024 (comprising Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For the three months ended December 29, 2024, Qualcomm’s total QCT revenue was **$10.084 billion** (reported as $10,084 million): handsets $7,574 million + automotive $961 million + IoT $1,549 million = $10,084 million.\n\nSource: Qualcomm’s 10-Q, file_stem **0000804328-25-000011**, in **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**; the QCT revenue-stream table appears at approximately characters **22,000–24,600**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's total of $10,084 million matches the reference and the gold quote ($10084 for the three months ended December 29, 2024). Its components are also correct: Handsets $7,574M, Automotive $961M, and IoT $1,549M. The arithmetic checks out (7,574 + 961 + 1,549 = 10,084), and the $10.084 billion conversion is accurate. Every factual claim is backed by the tool outputs. The accession 0000804328-25-000011 and the file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet appear in the describe_sources and duckdb_query results. The 10-Q period ended December 29, 2024 is shown in the header retrieved. The table sits at offset 22,342 to 23,246, inside the cited 22,000 to 24,600 window, and the retrieved substring contains the QCT revenue-stream table.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002148925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001136625, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010123, "wall_seconds": 21.796403328999077, "api_seconds": 20.21488869699897, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27736, "completion_tokens": 1050, "reasoning_tokens": 264, "cache_read_tokens": 14260, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/92c3257f7e0a4c49429a6feb.json", "detail_js": "details/92c3257f7e0a4c49429a6feb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/92c3257f7e0a4c49429a6feb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1e5f40ce942f42f1b12f2e5dc21c05ef.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c3e53ddea67f46d6b3c378d99d00fb7a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ebe460260f8618abe5f6a7bc", "question_id": "Q041", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table, and by how many percentage points did it increase compared to 2023?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin was 32% in fiscal year 2024 (Operating income of $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion), representing an increase of 5 percentage points from 27% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File Stem: `0001652044-25-000014`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), in Item 7 under the consolidated financial results overview table:\n\n### **Operating Margin:**\n* **Fiscal Year 2024:** **32%**\n* **Fiscal Year 2023:** **27%**\n\n### **Percentage Point Increase:**\n* **$32\\% - 27\\% =$** **5 percentage points** (also disclosed in the table's change column as **5%**).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives 32% operating margin for FY2024 and 27% for FY2023, matching the reference. The 5 percentage-point increase is correct arithmetic, and the table's '% Change' column shows 5%, as the candidate notes. The tool output contains the Executive Overview table with these exact values, plus the 'Year Ended December 31, 2024' header and the matching accession/file stem. The candidate omits the operating income dollar figures and revenue total that the reference includes, but the question did not ask for them, so this is a minor completeness gap rather than an error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0420979, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.040791, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013069, "wall_seconds": 32.35783085100047, "api_seconds": 29.657178940002268, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 60092, "completion_tokens": 1473, "reasoning_tokens": 379, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ebe460260f8618abe5f6a7bc.json", "detail_js": "details/ebe460260f8618abe5f6a7bc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ebe460260f8618abe5f6a7bc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d6a9225fc1d84ffa923cedaa09e2875f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a8ab09526a93496985e387e57eb5516d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9f961313e3c4efc3222406bc", "question_id": "Q041", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table, and by how many percentage points did it increase compared to 2023?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin was 32% in fiscal year 2024 (Operating income of $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion), representing an increase of 5 percentage points from 27% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Alphabet Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0001652044-25-000014`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), in **Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations** under the **Executive Overview** consolidated financial results table (character offset range ~171,305 to 183,305):\n\n- **Operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024:** **32%** (compared to **27%** in 2023)\n- **Increase compared to 2023:** **5 percentage points** (32% − 27% = 5 percentage points, disclosed in the table under the \"% Change\" column as 5%).", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same core answers as the reference: 32% operating margin for 2024, 27% for 2023, and a 5 percentage point increase. The tool output confirms these figures in the consolidated results table, and the table's '% Change' column shows 5% for the margin row, as the candidate says. The candidate's accession number, file_id, section label, and character offset range (171,305 to 183,305) all match the retrieved evidence. It omits the reference's supporting operating income ($112,390M) and revenue ($350.0B) figures, but the question did not ask for them, so this is a minor completeness gap. The candidate's sentence that the 5 percentage point change is 'disclosed' as 5% is a reasonable reading of the table, though the table does not label it as percentage points. Citation support is strong because every factual claim traces to retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.07030135, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.06729255, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0030088, "wall_seconds": 37.256069447999835, "api_seconds": 35.10517761800111, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 126329, "completion_tokens": 1624, "reasoning_tokens": 399, "cache_read_tokens": 16264, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9f961313e3c4efc3222406bc.json", "detail_js": "details/9f961313e3c4efc3222406bc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9f961313e3c4efc3222406bc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/afdaf02fbef8422caebe03d5dd34e19d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b6127cea04b64f2a9b273cf98e1fd393.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6c8a35901939fc211307bccb", "question_id": "Q041", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table, and by how many percentage points did it increase compared to 2023?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin was 32% in fiscal year 2024 (Operating income of $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion), representing an increase of 5 percentage points from 27% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet disclosed an operating margin of **32%** for fiscal 2024, compared with **27%** in 2023—an increase of **5 percentage points** (32% − 27%). The Results of Operations table is in filing `0001652044-25-000014`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the table excerpt was at character offset 170,000 onward.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives 32% for FY2024 and 27% for 2023, an increase of 5 percentage points. This matches the reference and the gold table row (Operating margin 27% | 32%). The arithmetic (32 - 27 = 5 pp) is correct and the units are right. The cited filing accession and parquet file are confirmed by the tool outputs. The character offset of 170,000 is supported by the substring query, which returned the consolidated results table with the 27%/32% margin row. Minor deductions: the table is labeled 'Executive Overview' in the retrieved text rather than 'Results of Operations', and the candidate does not note that the table's '5%' in the % Change column is a percentage-point change rather than a relative change. Neither affects the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00426576, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0026629600000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016028, "wall_seconds": 29.893839345000742, "api_seconds": 27.800214727998537, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56569, "completion_tokens": 1484, "reasoning_tokens": 479, "cache_read_tokens": 28021, "excerpt_characters": 12500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6c8a35901939fc211307bccb.json", "detail_js": "details/6c8a35901939fc211307bccb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6c8a35901939fc211307bccb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/83e76c0f858d4dff863a30e8a192ea01.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/280ec253c58742acb0d55f7dc5e4fcbf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ef3ec11d5b8523f090296f64", "question_id": "Q041", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table, and by how many percentage points did it increase compared to 2023?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin was 32% in fiscal year 2024 (Operating income of $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion), representing an increase of 5 percentage points from 27% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet reported an operating margin of **32% for fiscal 2024**, versus **27% in 2023**—an increase of **5 percentage points**.\n\n**Source:** Alphabet Inc. Form 10-K, file stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Results of Operations table (character offsets 171,250–183,250). The table lists operating margin as 27% for 2023 and 32% for 2024; **32% − 27% = 5 percentage points**.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports a 2024 operating margin of 32% versus 27% in 2023, an increase of 5 percentage points. This matches the reference and the gold quote in the Results of Operations table ('Operating margin | 27% | 32%'). The tool output for accession 0001652044-25-000014 shows the same table, and the cited character offsets 171,250–183,250 match the read_filing result exactly. The arithmetic (32 − 27 = 5) is correct. The answer omits the supporting operating income and revenue figures that the reference includes, which is a minor completeness gap that does not affect the answer to the question asked.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004046005, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002063805, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019822, "wall_seconds": 23.777275779000774, "api_seconds": 22.68885176799813, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 53623, "completion_tokens": 949, "reasoning_tokens": 202, "cache_read_tokens": 23198, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ef3ec11d5b8523f090296f64.json", "detail_js": "details/ef3ec11d5b8523f090296f64.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ef3ec11d5b8523f090296f64.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5808f4c4f8a84e80b98271360a42ed25.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d7010fec2c574e97aad21058f2e87ccb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9fc52c2c55876700104ac985", "question_id": "Q042", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 by subtracting Purchases of property and equipment from Net cash provided by operating activities.", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $72,764 million ($72.764 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($125,299 million) minus Purchases of property and equipment ($52,535 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Alphabet Inc.’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession Number / `file_stem`: `0001652044-25-000014`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 8, page 56):\n\n### **Values for Fiscal Year 2024** (in millions):\n- **Net cash provided by operating activities:** $\\$125,299$ million\n- **Purchases of property and equipment:** $\\$52,535$ million\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation:**\n$$\\begin{aligned}\n\\text{Free Cash Flow} &= \\text{Net cash provided by operating activities} - \\text{Purchases of property and equipment} \\\\\n&= \\$125,299\\text{ million} - \\$52,535\\text{ million} \\\\\n&= \\mathbf{\\$72,764\\text{ million}}\n\\end{aligned}$$\n\nAlphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 was **$72,764 million** (or **$72.764 billion**).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's inputs match the tool-retrieved 2024 cash flow statement: operating cash flow $125,299M and purchases of property and equipment $52,535M. Its arithmetic is correct: 125,299 - 52,535 = 72,764 million, or $72.764 billion, matching the reference. The units (millions) and fiscal year (year ended December 31, 2024) are supported by the tool output. The accession number and file reference appear in the retrieved header, and the page 56 marker appears after the statement in the tool output. The only minor gap is that the page attribution is inferred from a page marker rather than stated explicitly, so citation support is not a perfect 100.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02220925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02115975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010495, "wall_seconds": 23.338465923001422, "api_seconds": 22.071280408999883, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32948, "completion_tokens": 1152, "reasoning_tokens": 241, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/9fc52c2c55876700104ac985.json", "detail_js": "details/9fc52c2c55876700104ac985.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9fc52c2c55876700104ac985.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dd0d2f7c932049d681d26af6f5f78069.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a19b1c4951d4425dbe7a39ad12f94a03.request.json" }, { "task_id": "638cd8ec9a08aa14775c3b2a", "question_id": "Q042", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 by subtracting Purchases of property and equipment from Net cash provided by operating activities.", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $72,764 million ($72.764 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($125,299 million) minus Purchases of property and equipment ($52,535 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0001652044-25-000014`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), from the **Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows** (page 56):\n\n### **Reported Figures for Fiscal Year 2024 (in millions):**\n* **Net cash provided by operating activities:** $\\$125,299$ million\n* **Purchases of property and equipment:** $\\$52,535$ million\n\n---\n\n### **Free Cash Flow Calculation:**\n$$\\begin{aligned}\n\\text{Free Cash Flow} &= \\text{Net cash provided by operating activities} - \\text{Purchases of property and equipment} \\\\\n&= \\$125,299\\text{ million} - \\$52,535\\text{ million} \\\\\n&= \\mathbf{\\$72,764\\text{ million}} \\quad (\\text{or } \\mathbf{\\$72.764\\text{ billion}})\n\\end{aligned}$$", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 125,299 - 52,535 = 72,764 million, or $72.764 billion, matching the reference. Both inputs appear verbatim in the tool-returned Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows table (Net cash provided by operating activities 125299; Purchases of property and equipment (52535) for 2024). The accession 0001652044-25-000014, file_id sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the statement section are all traceable to the tool outputs. The page 56 reference is supported by the '56.' page marker that follows the statement in the retrieved text. Units are stated correctly as millions. Minor deduction only because the candidate's sign convention and the parenthetical billion conversion are presented without an explicit tool-sourced note, though both are arithmetically sound.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0596517, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0568185, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0028332, "wall_seconds": 32.977306249998946, "api_seconds": 31.469226490000437, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 97805, "completion_tokens": 1257, "reasoning_tokens": 175, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/638cd8ec9a08aa14775c3b2a.json", "detail_js": "details/638cd8ec9a08aa14775c3b2a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/638cd8ec9a08aa14775c3b2a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d3a2e65e0d594096a8e22b70f78de46d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f421b33883ba45158c5925eaea3e4713.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b6aedcd6d7982a592a150fed", "question_id": "Q042", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 by subtracting Purchases of property and equipment from Net cash provided by operating activities.", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $72,764 million ($72.764 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($125,299 million) minus Purchases of property and equipment ($52,535 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The filing reports 2024 net cash provided by operating activities of **$125,299 million**. It gives capital expenditures only as a rounded **$52.5 billion**, not the exact cash-flow-statement amount for purchases of property and equipment. Therefore, the exact Free Cash Flow cannot be calculated from the returned evidence. **File:** `0001652044-25-000014`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`.", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: 2024 operating cash flow of $125,299M minus purchases of property and equipment of $52,535M gives $72,764M. The candidate correctly reports the $125,299M operating cash flow, and its tool outputs do show capex of $52.5 billion in the MD&A. It then abstains, saying the exact FCF cannot be calculated. The reference is answerable, so the abstention is not justified. Its own evidence supports an approximate figure of about $72.8B, and it never retrieved the exact cash-flow-statement row ($52,535M), which appears in the gold evidence but not in the candidate's tool outputs. The candidate's cited statements are supported by its tool outputs (accession, file, $125,299M, '$52.5 billion'), so citation support is high. Correctness is low because no FCF value is given.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004489895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002957795, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015321, "wall_seconds": 41.77003279500059, "api_seconds": 39.41634934200192, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55785, "completion_tokens": 1980, "reasoning_tokens": 816, "cache_read_tokens": 27522, "excerpt_characters": 10900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b6aedcd6d7982a592a150fed.json", "detail_js": "details/b6aedcd6d7982a592a150fed.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b6aedcd6d7982a592a150fed.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/58f95bda4008477ba0005f521b6c5a09.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/748029ca7a4244f5925728d5f05e15e3.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fa2cd3fbba8c1cce9daad83d", "question_id": "Q042", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2024 by subtracting Purchases of property and equipment from Net cash provided by operating activities.", "reference": "Alphabet Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $72,764 million ($72.764 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($125,299 million) minus Purchases of property and equipment ($52,535 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet’s fiscal 2024 free cash flow was **$72.764 billion**:\n\n**$125.299 billion** net cash provided by operating activities − **$52.535 billion** purchases of property and equipment = **$72.764 billion**.\n\nThe filing reports both figures in millions in the cash-flow table for 2022, 2023, and 2024. Evidence: file stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` (scoped SQL result).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic and units are correct: $125,299M minus $52,535M equals $72,764M, shown as $72.764 billion. Both inputs match the 2024 column of the cash-flow table in the tool output (the duckdb_query result shows 125299 and (52535)), and the 2024 fiscal-year mapping is right. The citation is supported by the tool evidence: the file stem 0001652044-25-000014 and file ID sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet both appear in the read_filing and duckdb outputs. It cites the scoped SQL result rather than quoting the exact table line, so it is slightly less precise than it could be.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00825413, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00532773, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0029264, "wall_seconds": 37.91261779600063, "api_seconds": 35.850983387996166, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 105056, "completion_tokens": 1380, "reasoning_tokens": 524, "cache_read_tokens": 42498, "excerpt_characters": 49200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fa2cd3fbba8c1cce9daad83d.json", "detail_js": "details/fa2cd3fbba8c1cce9daad83d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fa2cd3fbba8c1cce9daad83d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2bd80f8285f24f06997a1d2975aeb588.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0fdb540c6ab1498aa1bd63cb78454c82.request.json" }, { "task_id": "67fd22e518df9f674f38085f", "question_id": "Q043", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s percentage year-over-year growth in total net sales from 2023 ($574,785 million) to 2024 ($637,959 million)?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales grew by 10.99% (calculated as ($637,959M - $574,785M) / $574,785M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (filing accession/`file_stem`: `0001018724-25-000004`, CIK: `0001018724`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, around character offset ~120,600–121,050):\n\n### 1. Values Reported\n* **2023 Total Net Sales (Consolidated):** $574,785 million\n* **2024 Total Net Sales (Consolidated):** $637,959 million\n\n---\n\n### 2. Year-over-Year Percentage Growth Calculation\n$$\\text{Percentage Growth} = \\frac{637,959 - 574,785}{574,785} \\times 100\\% = \\frac{63,174}{574,785} \\times 100\\% \\approx 10.9909\\%$$\n\n* **Exact calculated growth:** **~10.99%** (or **10.9909%**)\n* **Reported in the filing table (\"Year-over-year Percentage Growth: Consolidated\"):** **11%**", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: (637,959 - 574,785) / 574,785 = 10.9909%, which matches the reference's 10.99%. The 2023 and 2024 consolidated net sales figures ($574,785M and $637,959M) match the tool output. The accession 0001018724-25-000004, file ID, and the approximate offset (~120,600 to 121,050) are supported by the tool queries. The reported 11% consolidated growth figure appears in the tool snippet. The candidate cites the segment/growth table rather than the income statement quoted in the gold evidence, but the same values appear in the retrieved text. Minor deduction: the 'fiscal year ended December 31, 2024' label is not explicitly confirmed in the tool outputs, which show only a February 2025 filing date and the accession.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02840525, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02736225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001043, "wall_seconds": 34.67978162700092, "api_seconds": 30.84812692200103, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 37653, "completion_tokens": 1852, "reasoning_tokens": 506, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/67fd22e518df9f674f38085f.json", "detail_js": "details/67fd22e518df9f674f38085f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/67fd22e518df9f674f38085f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/faf452bb5e694578a8c68d79100b7c05.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2950cd5dd0d54b2f8d2399b7c761ba73.request.json" }, { "task_id": "39ecaf26a2b6362ba8a83225", "question_id": "Q043", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s percentage year-over-year growth in total net sales from 2023 ($574,785 million) to 2024 ($637,959 million)?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales grew by 10.99% (calculated as ($637,959M - $574,785M) / $574,785M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 7 – *Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Effect of Foreign Exchange Rates*):\n\n- **2023 Net Sales (As Reported):** $574,785 million\n- **2024 Net Sales (As Reported):** $637,959 million\n\n### Calculation of Percentage Year-over-Year Growth:\n\n$$\\text{Dollar Increase} = \\$637,959 - \\$574,785 = \\$63,174\\text{ million}$$\n\n$$\\text{Percentage Growth} = \\frac{\\$63,174}{\\$574,785} \\times 100\\% \\approx 10.99089\\% \\approx 10.99\\% \\text{ (or } 11.0\\%)$$", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $637,959M - $574,785M = $63,174M, and $63,174M / $574,785M = 10.99%, matching the reference. The units (millions USD) and fiscal years (2023 and 2024) are correct, and the 11.0% rounding is a harmless variant. The tool evidence supports the inputs: the retrieved Item 7 Non-GAAP 'Effect of Foreign Exchange Rates' table shows As Reported net sales of $574785 (2023) and $637959 (2024), and the accession and file ID match the search results. The candidate did not cite the gold Item 8 Consolidated Statements of Operations table, but its cited source is supported by the retrieved text, so this does not reduce citation support much.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0356589, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0342255, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014334, "wall_seconds": 32.96326742299971, "api_seconds": 29.732461370998863, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52368, "completion_tokens": 1520, "reasoning_tokens": 448, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/39ecaf26a2b6362ba8a83225.json", "detail_js": "details/39ecaf26a2b6362ba8a83225.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/39ecaf26a2b6362ba8a83225.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8df98370d59a49ce9309bcde3413e10f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3538940b35654c61a87bbd2f05e68b59.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4c83ee4a1a31a6b2066f689a", "question_id": "Q043", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s percentage year-over-year growth in total net sales from 2023 ($574,785 million) to 2024 ($637,959 million)?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales grew by 10.99% (calculated as ($637,959M - $574,785M) / $574,785M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s total net sales grew **approximately 11.0% year over year** from 2023 to 2024.\n\nCalculation: \\((\\$637{,}959\\text{ million} - \\$574{,}785\\text{ million}) \\div \\$574{,}785\\text{ million} \\times 100 \\approx 10.99\\%\\).\n\nThe figures are from Amazon’s 2024 Form 10-K, consolidated statements of operations (file_stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, text around character offset 166000).", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: (637,959 - 574,785) / 574,785 = 10.99%. Its headline of 'approximately 11.0%' is a one-decimal rounding of the reference's 10.99%, which is acceptable but slightly less precise. The figures match the reference and the tool output. The tool evidence shows the Consolidated Statements of Operations table at offset 166000 in filing 0001018724-25-000004, with total net sales of 574785 (2023) and 637959 (2024) in millions, so the cited source and values are supported. The candidate's file reference and offset are consistent with the query results.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0024019849999999997, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001268585, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011334, "wall_seconds": 23.958371630998954, "api_seconds": 21.075246781001624, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30972, "completion_tokens": 1013, "reasoning_tokens": 246, "cache_read_tokens": 15081, "excerpt_characters": 5600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4c83ee4a1a31a6b2066f689a.json", "detail_js": "details/4c83ee4a1a31a6b2066f689a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4c83ee4a1a31a6b2066f689a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dbeb418ad21a42f587761babc348657a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b6ecef8016bb47f5b0eb92eb8338f9a9.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d32cd3e392d7b70780335272", "question_id": "Q043", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s percentage year-over-year growth in total net sales from 2023 ($574,785 million) to 2024 ($637,959 million)?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s total net sales grew by 10.99% (calculated as ($637,959M - $574,785M) / $574,785M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon’s total net sales grew **approximately 11.0% year over year**:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{637{,}959-574{,}785}{574{,}785}\\times100\n=\\frac{63{,}174}{574{,}785}\\times100\n\\approx 10.99\\%.\n\\]\n\nThe 2024 10-K reports consolidated net sales of $574,785 million for 2023 and $637,959 million for 2024, and rounds the growth to 11% (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at offsets 119,772–131,772).", "correctness": 93, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: (637,959 - 574,785) / 574,785 = 10.99%, which matches the reference. Its headline of 'approximately 11.0%' is a one-decimal rounding of 10.99% and is consistent with the filing's stated 11%. Units (millions) and fiscal years (2023 vs. 2024) are correct. The tool evidence supports the cited figures: the consolidated net sales row ($574,785 / $637,959) and the 11% consolidated growth appear in the passage at offsets 119772-131772 of accession 0001018724-25-000004 in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet. The gold quote is a markdown table row that the candidate's passage corroborates. Small deduction because the headline rounds to 11.0% rather than giving the reference's 10.99% directly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004101795, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0021154950000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019863, "wall_seconds": 25.974221793998368, "api_seconds": 24.109128290998342, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 55607, "completion_tokens": 1281, "reasoning_tokens": 449, "cache_read_tokens": 26537, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d32cd3e392d7b70780335272.json", "detail_js": "details/d32cd3e392d7b70780335272.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d32cd3e392d7b70780335272.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5ba6dbc1dbe64361bc308222e1b602c7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b2a23db057ae4914b569a7c82215fb5d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "84c5e7fa492d5f09074b0ea8", "question_id": "Q044", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total net sales?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 10.75%, calculated as Operating income ($68,593 million) divided by Total net sales ($637,959 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s Consolidated Statements of Operations in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Financial Data (FY 2024)**\n* **Operating income:** $68,593 million\n* **Total net sales:** $637,959 million\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation**\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating income}}{\\text{Total net sales}} = \\frac{\\$68,593}{\\$637,959} \\approx 0.107519 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{10.75\\%}$$", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 10.75% operating margin matches the reference. Operating income ($68,593M) and total net sales ($637,959M) for 2024 both appear in the income statement the tool retrieved, and the DuckDB calculation returned 0.10752 (10.75%). The accession number and units are correct. The one small gap is that the tool output shows the statement columns but never explicitly labels the filing as a Form 10-K or states the fiscal year-end date, so the candidate's description of those details goes slightly beyond the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0185694, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.017685, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008844, "wall_seconds": 23.65590658600013, "api_seconds": 21.454623367999375, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26499, "completion_tokens": 1185, "reasoning_tokens": 283, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/84c5e7fa492d5f09074b0ea8.json", "detail_js": "details/84c5e7fa492d5f09074b0ea8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/84c5e7fa492d5f09074b0ea8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7d3ae585aa0148b5803326b1ed4ff1e3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c4ab4cc906a04dad85d95cfce1cb244a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c121a741dfc2241102914f8c", "question_id": "Q044", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total net sales?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 10.75%, calculated as Operating income ($68,593 million) divided by Total net sales ($637,959 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s Consolidated Statements of Operations in its 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 8, page 37):\n\n### **1. Financial Figures for Fiscal Year 2024**\n* **Operating income:** **$68,593 million**\n* **Total net sales:** **$637,959 million**\n * *(comprising Net product sales of $272,311 million and Net service sales of $365,648 million)*\n\n---\n\n### **2. Operating Margin Calculation**\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating income}}{\\text{Total net sales}} = \\frac{\\$68,593}{\\$637,959} \\approx 0.1075194 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{10.75\\%}$$", "correctness": 93, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The final answer of 10.75% matches the reference. Operating income ($68,593M) and total net sales ($637,959M) match the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the tool output, and the product/service sales split ($272,311M / $365,648M) also matches. The intermediate decimal 0.1075194 is slightly off; 68,593/637,959 is about 0.107506, which still rounds to 10.75%. The cited accession, file ID, and Item 8 location are supported by the tool results. Page 37 is supported by the index table in the tool output. The deduction is for the minor decimal arithmetic slip.", "known_cost_usd": 0.045243900000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0427005, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025434, "wall_seconds": 32.15242049900007, "api_seconds": 30.256489862002127, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 74438, "completion_tokens": 1586, "reasoning_tokens": 310, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/c121a741dfc2241102914f8c.json", "detail_js": "details/c121a741dfc2241102914f8c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c121a741dfc2241102914f8c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6a2befcc774b48c3a2cabc7afd710793.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d5ec7afb13c8426a9f943aed54d5e226.request.json" }, { "task_id": "131ae79b2dd9cf8a076f25b4", "question_id": "Q044", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total net sales?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 10.75%, calculated as Operating income ($68,593 million) divided by Total net sales ($637,959 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s fiscal 2024 operating margin was **10.8%**.\n\nUsing the 2024 consolidated statements of operations (amounts in millions): **Operating income $68,593 ÷ Total net sales $637,959 × 100 = 10.752…%**, or **10.8%** rounded to one decimal place.\n\nSource: 2024 Form 10-K, `file_stem` **0001018724-25-000004**, `file_id` **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**, statement passage at approximately characters **165,700–167,500**.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $68,593M / $637,959M = 0.107515, or 10.75% to two decimals and 10.8% to one decimal. Both figures match the reference's 10.75% at different precision. The inputs are correct and match the consolidated statements of operations passage in the tool output. The candidate's source citation (file_stem 0001018724-25-000004, file_id sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, offsets about 165,700–167,500) is supported by the duckdb substring query, which returned the Operating income (68593) and Total net sales (637959) rows. Small deduction because the answer rounds to 10.8% rather than the reference's 10.75%, which is a presentation difference rather than an error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00265126, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00140276, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012485, "wall_seconds": 28.42758873099956, "api_seconds": 24.84442756399949, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 36386, "completion_tokens": 1392, "reasoning_tokens": 544, "cache_read_tokens": 20456, "excerpt_characters": 6800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001238", "0001959173-25-001264" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/131ae79b2dd9cf8a076f25b4.json", "detail_js": "details/131ae79b2dd9cf8a076f25b4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/131ae79b2dd9cf8a076f25b4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/60e960631189459e9232208f86f0e6da.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5215e0ad8d77434fa79d5cce8128045a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d69681471cdca528c519f037", "question_id": "Q044", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total net sales?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 10.75%, calculated as Operating income ($68,593 million) divided by Total net sales ($637,959 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon.com, Inc.’s fiscal 2024 operating margin was **10.75%**.\n\nThe 2024 consolidated statement of operations reports operating income of **$68,593 million** and total net sales of **$637,959 million**. Calculation: $68,593 ÷ $637,959 × 100 = **10.7519%**. (Form 10-K, file_stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at character offset 165,302.)", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 68,593 / 637,959 = 10.7519%, which rounds to the reference's 10.75%. The operating income ($68,593M) and total net sales ($637,959M) figures match the consolidated statement of operations in the tool output, and the 2024 column is correctly identified. The cited accession (0001018724-25-000004) and the offset 165,302 match the read_filing result that contains the statement. The candidate's claim that the passage is at offset 165,302 is accurate. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not quote the exact table row, but the cited passage does contain the supporting figures.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003712445, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001911245, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018012, "wall_seconds": 24.772516164999615, "api_seconds": 22.962402819999625, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 49624, "completion_tokens": 996, "reasoning_tokens": 318, "cache_read_tokens": 22367, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d69681471cdca528c519f037.json", "detail_js": "details/d69681471cdca528c519f037.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d69681471cdca528c519f037.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/681e3100a28a40c5a247e7e92bcc1155.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ab876ab526ab428390cff23eaa00717b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "20a5650db6e38c3f17535182", "question_id": "Q045", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $38,219 million ($38.219 billion), reflecting Net cash provided by operating activities of $115,877 million minus Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives of $77,658 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Item 7 – *Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures*), the Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table discloses the following for fiscal year 2024:\n\n### **Free Cash Flow Reconciliation**\n*(in millions)*\n\n| Line Item | Year Ended December 31, 2024 |\n| :--- | :--- |\n| **Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities** | $115,877 |\n| Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives | $(77,658) |\n| **Free cash flow** | **$38,219** |\n\n---\n\n### Additional Free Cash Flow Measures Disclosed:\n* **Free cash flow less principal repayments of finance leases and financing obligations**: **$35,507 million** \n * Free cash flow: $38,219 million \n * Less: Principal repayments of finance leases: $(2,043) million \n * Less: Principal repayments of financing obligations: $(669) million", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the reference: 2024 free cash flow is $38,219M, from operating cash flow of $115,877M less net capex of $77,658M. The tool output shows the same reconciliation table with these values. The extra measure (free cash flow less principal repayments of finance leases and financing obligations, $35,507M) is also supported by the tool output, and the arithmetic checks out (38,219 - 2,043 - 669 = 35,507). Minor deduction: the candidate's section label 'Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures' is loosely supported by the tool text, which references that heading, but the gold cites a 'Free Cash Flow Table' location, so the citation is slightly less precise. Fiscal year end of December 31, 2024 is consistent with the table headers.", "known_cost_usd": 0.035836925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.034556025000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012809, "wall_seconds": 40.174176996000824, "api_seconds": 35.544098901002144, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48642, "completion_tokens": 2595, "reasoning_tokens": 1221, "cache_read_tokens": 3037, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010585" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/20a5650db6e38c3f17535182.json", "detail_js": "details/20a5650db6e38c3f17535182.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/20a5650db6e38c3f17535182.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/71bb7e625b2c493d8e1f7406a77df04c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5cb76a493496405a9ac727a664bcda07.request.json" }, { "task_id": "acdb82b5005ce4a76956a6ba", "question_id": "Q045", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $38,219 million ($38.219 billion), reflecting Net cash provided by operating activities of $115,877 million minus Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives of $77,658 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (filed with the SEC on February 6, 2025; file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), in **Item 7 — Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures**, the Free Cash Flow reconciliation table discloses:\n\n### **Free Cash Flow Reconciliation (in millions)**\n\n| Line Item | Year Ended December 31, 2024 |\n| :--- | :--- |\n| **Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities** | **$115,877** |\n| Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives | $(77,658) |\n| **Free cash flow** | **$38,219** |\n\n---\n\n### Additional Free Cash Flow Measures Disclosed:\n* **Free cash flow less principal repayments of finance leases and financing obligations:** **$35,507 million**\n * Free cash flow: $38,219 million\n * Less principal repayments of finance leases: $(2,043) million\n * Less principal repayments of financing obligations: $(669) million\n* **Free cash flow less equipment finance leases and principal repayments of all other finance leases and financing obligations:** **$36,211 million**", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 82, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: 2024 Free Cash Flow is $38,219M, built from operating cash flow of $115,877M less net capex of $77,658M. These figures match the reconciliation table in the retrieved filing text, which also gives the 2023 comparatives. The extra measures ($35,507M and $36,211M) are also correct per the retrieved text. The units (millions) and the Item 7 location are correct. Citation support is reduced because the claim that the filing was made on February 6, 2025 is not in the tool output. The DuckDB query that would have returned filing_date failed, and the only February 6, 2025 reference in the retrieved text is to the earnings-release guidance date, not the filing date. The accession number, file ID, and table figures are otherwise well supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0244558, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.022767000000000003, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016888, "wall_seconds": 24.97838295099973, "api_seconds": 22.223611880001044, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40419, "completion_tokens": 1365, "reasoning_tokens": 396, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/acdb82b5005ce4a76956a6ba.json", "detail_js": "details/acdb82b5005ce4a76956a6ba.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/acdb82b5005ce4a76956a6ba.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/991b63bc8c4b4526b498965a581fad91.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2676c94a453a48cbbc8ee0faa4e4c0ca.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1d8ec9897a5d055eb1855599", "question_id": "Q045", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $38,219 million ($38.219 billion), reflecting Net cash provided by operating activities of $115,877 million minus Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives of $77,658 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned passages do not include Amazon’s Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table or its fiscal 2024 Free Cash Flow figure, so I can’t determine the amount from the available evidence.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence shows Free cash flow of $38,219 million for 2024 in the Item 7 table of accession 0001018724-25-000004. The candidate abstained, which earns full correctness only if the question is unanswerable, and it is not. The tool trace did locate the 'non-gaap free cash flow' section at offset ~99320 but never read the table, so the candidate's statement that the retrieved passages lack the table and the 2024 figure is accurate about the tool output. However, the answer was reachable with further reading, so the abstention is incomplete and the correctness score is low. Citation support is high because the candidate's claim matches the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00380126, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00238146, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014198, "wall_seconds": 33.211341077001634, "api_seconds": 27.082063635998566, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48711, "completion_tokens": 1327, "reasoning_tokens": 391, "cache_read_tokens": 23111, "excerpt_characters": 12100, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1d8ec9897a5d055eb1855599.json", "detail_js": "details/1d8ec9897a5d055eb1855599.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1d8ec9897a5d055eb1855599.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2c2b430d4b4644b2bde6e60aeebb90a0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7334d0e803c34e85980890102d3e9c8f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "91a57532a6924c31b980d289", "question_id": "Q045", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table?", "reference": "Amazon.com, Inc.'s Free Cash Flow in 2024 was $38,219 million ($38.219 billion), reflecting Net cash provided by operating activities of $115,877 million minus Purchases of property and equipment, net of proceeds from sales and incentives of $77,658 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence does not include the Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow reconciliation table or its fiscal 2024 value, so I can’t verify the amount. The filing located was Amazon’s 2024 Form 10-K (file_stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), but the excerpts returned do not establish the answer.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives FCF of $38,219 million for 2024, sourced to the Free Cash Flow table in accession 0001018724-25-000004. The candidate did not provide this figure and abstained. The reference is answerable from the filing, so abstention does not earn full correctness, and the answer is missing. Citation support is high because the candidate's claims match the tool outputs: the filing was identified by accession and file ID, and the returned excerpts (the read_filing window ending around char 109251 and the query excerpts) did not include the reconciliation table. The candidate also did not follow up on the 'free cash flows' hit at offset 98252 with a read that would have reached the table, so the abstention reflects incomplete retrieval rather than a verified absence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00416964, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00267894, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014907, "wall_seconds": 32.91199162999874, "api_seconds": 28.665415956998913, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 61236, "completion_tokens": 1281, "reasoning_tokens": 387, "cache_read_tokens": 33154, "excerpt_characters": 17000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/91a57532a6924c31b980d289.json", "detail_js": "details/91a57532a6924c31b980d289.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/91a57532a6924c31b980d289.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bfa5a68284b94f65bb28dd691bfa9374.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4c015898d6a84585b8af2adba20ed9c0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "943c40ca3387e20a44f154b5", "question_id": "Q046", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew by 114.20% (or 114%) in fiscal year 2025, rising from $60,922 million to $130,497 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (Filing accession / `file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Revenue Data**\n* **Fiscal Year 2025** (Year ended January 26, 2025): **$130,497 million**\n* **Fiscal Year 2024** (Year ended January 28, 2024): **$60,922 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation**\n* **Dollar Change**:\n $$\\$130,497\\text{ million} - \\$60,922\\text{ million} = \\$69,575\\text{ million}$$\n\n* **Percentage Revenue Growth**:\n $$\\frac{130,497 - 60,922}{60,922} \\times 100\\% = \\frac{69,575}{60,922} \\times 100\\% \\approx 114.2034\\%$$\n\nRounded to the nearest whole percentage (as reported in Item 7, *Reportable Segments - Revenue by Reportable Segments* of the 10-K), NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth was **114%** (or **114.20%** rounded to two decimal places).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference. FY2025 revenue of $130,497M (year ended Jan 26, 2025) and FY2024 revenue of $60,922M (year ended Jan 28, 2024) are correct, with units in millions. The arithmetic checks out: a $69,575M change gives 69,575/60,922 = 114.20%, and the candidate reports both 114% and 114.20%, matching the reference. The accession number 0001045810-25-000023 and the file_id are supported by the tool outputs. The segment table in the tool output shows $130497, $60922, $69575 and 114%, so the cited figures are grounded. The candidate attributes the table to 'Reportable Segments - Revenue by Reportable Segments', which matches where the tool output shows it, though the gold evidence cites the MD&A Overview. This is a minor section-label difference and does not affect correctness.", "known_cost_usd": 0.029750600000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.028539000000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012116, "wall_seconds": 30.6651266580011, "api_seconds": 28.114462442999866, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41193, "completion_tokens": 1795, "reasoning_tokens": 407, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/943c40ca3387e20a44f154b5.json", "detail_js": "details/943c40ca3387e20a44f154b5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/943c40ca3387e20a44f154b5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d758ceb0aa044902ad63ff7a81b60f42.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/41409561d61945cb850438ff4767185f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1e44888e84e42c9d92516ab5", "question_id": "Q046", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew by 114.20% (or 114%) in fiscal year 2025, rising from $60,922 million to $130,497 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem: `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), from the **Consolidated Statements of Income** and **Results of Operations**:\n\n### Revenue:\n- **Fiscal Year 2025 (Year ended Jan 26, 2025):** $130,497 million\n- **Fiscal Year 2024 (Year ended Jan 28, 2024):** $60,922 million\n\n### Dollar Increase:\n$$\\$130,497\\text{ million} - \\$60,922\\text{ million} = \\$69,575\\text{ million}$$\n\n### Percentage Revenue Growth:\n$$\\frac{\\$130,497 - \\$60,922}{\\$60,922} = \\frac{\\$69,575}{\\$60,922} \\approx 1.142034 \\text{ or } 114.20\\%$$\n\nIn the filing's **Revenue by Reportable Segments** table, NVIDIA reports the total percentage change as **114%**.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: revenue of $130,497M in FY2025 versus $60,922M in FY2024, a $69,575M increase, and 114.20% growth. The percentage is correct to two decimals, and the filing's own segment table reports 114%. The Jan 26, 2025 and Jan 28, 2024 year-end dates and accession 0001045810-25-000023 are supported by the tool outputs, which include the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Revenue by Reportable Segments table. The only flaw is a minor rounding slip in the intermediate ratio (1.142034 should be about 1.142030), which does not change the reported 114.20%.", "known_cost_usd": 0.070497, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.066837, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.00366, "wall_seconds": 37.279024077999566, "api_seconds": 34.62945519799723, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 118711, "completion_tokens": 1401, "reasoning_tokens": 309, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 60000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/1e44888e84e42c9d92516ab5.json", "detail_js": "details/1e44888e84e42c9d92516ab5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1e44888e84e42c9d92516ab5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1dfef21ba38846c28f4004e993df23bf.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ae418d42b1e6422dbc6af1c82fb98e67.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ccbf669380d40f528be9cbb2", "question_id": "Q046", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew by 114.20% (or 114%) in fiscal year 2025, rising from $60,922 million to $130,497 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s revenue grew **114%** in fiscal 2025 compared with fiscal 2024. The filing reports revenue of **$130,497 million** for the year ended January 26, 2025, versus **$60,922 million** for the year ended January 28, 2024—an increase of **$69,575 million**. Calculation: \\((130{,}497-60{,}922)/60{,}922 \\times 100 \\approx 114.2\\%\\), or **114%** rounded.\n\n**Source:** NVIDIA Form 10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; revenue-by-reportable-segments table in the queried passage beginning at character offset 223,500.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference: revenue of $130,497M for FY2025 versus $60,922M for FY2024, a $69,575M increase, and growth of about 114.2% (rounded to 114%). The year-end dates (Jan 26, 2025 and Jan 28, 2024) and the millions unit are correct, and the arithmetic checks out. The cited accession, file_id, and offset 223,500 match the tool outputs, and the revenue-by-segment table in the tool result shows the same totals and the 114% change. Minor deduction: the candidate cites the segment table rather than the gold quote's overview line, and the reference's 114.20% precision is only approximated in the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00249118, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00137478, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011164, "wall_seconds": 30.107793630999367, "api_seconds": 27.864851601001646, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33146, "completion_tokens": 1425, "reasoning_tokens": 480, "cache_read_tokens": 18683, "excerpt_characters": 4100, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/ccbf669380d40f528be9cbb2.json", "detail_js": "details/ccbf669380d40f528be9cbb2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ccbf669380d40f528be9cbb2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fc2210393fb347eea0a678c7c289633e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/464705bd49e3444f872cfced34d987e7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "aed1b969e582b10bc08c6888", "question_id": "Q046", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's percentage revenue growth in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew by 114.20% (or 114%) in fiscal year 2025, rising from $60,922 million to $130,497 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s revenue grew **114%** in fiscal year 2025 compared with fiscal year 2024, according to its fiscal 2025 results.\n\n**Source:** NVIDIA Corporation filing, file stem `0001045810-25-000086`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-05.parquet`, characters 17,386–29,386. The filing reports revenue of **$130.5 billion** and says it was “up 114% year on year.”", "correctness": 85, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives 114.20% (about 114%) growth from $60,922M to $130,497M. The candidate's 114% matches the reference's rounded figure, and its $130.5 billion revenue figure is consistent with $130,497M. It omits the precise 114.20% and the prior-year $60.9 billion base, so it is mostly but not fully complete. Citation support is strong: the tool output for characters 17386–29386 of accession 0001045810-25-000086 contains the quoted 'surging 114% year on year to $130.5 billion' and the 'up 114% year on year' table entry, and the candidate's file stem, file ID, and offsets match that output. The gold evidence cites a different accession (0001045810-25-000023), but the candidate is judged only on its own tool evidence, which does support the claim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004026285, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002024485, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0020018, "wall_seconds": 29.12792446000094, "api_seconds": 26.930963943003007, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 54832, "completion_tokens": 1375, "reasoning_tokens": 603, "cache_read_tokens": 26911, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000097", "0001045810-25-000102", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001045810-25-000120", "0001045810-25-000123", "0001045810-25-000124", "0001045810-25-000127", "0001045810-25-000128", "0001045810-25-000130", "0001214659-25-008150", "0001225208-25-005831", "0001921094-25-000574", "0001921094-25-000709", "0001950047-25-004520", "0001958244-25-003698", "0001961863-25-000072", "0001965301-25-000076", "0001973251-25-000041" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/aed1b969e582b10bc08c6888.json", "detail_js": "details/aed1b969e582b10bc08c6888.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/aed1b969e582b10bc08c6888.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8e927e3cc4cc4ee59ca22463917d648a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ec585f5453604cb1a1979129b6b51c9f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "bb3ee0dce31f40407da84aa7", "question_id": "Q047", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin was 74.99% (reported as 75.0%), calculated as Gross profit ($97,858 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report (Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025; file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\nIn the section presenting items from the **Consolidated Statements of Income** expressed as a percentage of revenue:\n\n- **Revenue**: 100.0%\n- **Cost of revenue**: 25.0%\n- **Gross profit margin**: **75.0%**\n\n*(Year ended January 26, 2025 / Fiscal Year 2025)*", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 75.0% gross profit margin matches the reference's reported figure (74.99%, reported as 75.0%) and the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 is correct. It does not show the dollar-based calculation ($97,858M / $130,497M) that the reference uses, so it is slightly less complete. The tool output directly supports the 75.0% gross profit and 25.0% cost of revenue figures in the Consolidated Statements of Income percentage table, with the correct accession and file. The dollar figures in the gold quote do not appear in the retrieved tool output, so that part of the support is absent.", "known_cost_usd": 0.037470250000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03605175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014185, "wall_seconds": 41.212203748998945, "api_seconds": 38.26669976099765, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 53994, "completion_tokens": 1652, "reasoning_tokens": 505, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000033", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000039", "0001045810-25-000065", "0001045810-25-000069" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/bb3ee0dce31f40407da84aa7.json", "detail_js": "details/bb3ee0dce31f40407da84aa7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/bb3ee0dce31f40407da84aa7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f1cc5e91b6b64f6b882a8c0841ae4b98.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d7409d6a7686462ab15cabe386bd4509.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8b7356c142ee00f47394d888", "question_id": "Q047", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin was 74.99% (reported as 75.0%), calculated as Gross profit ($97,858 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Gross Profit Margin Percentage (Fiscal Year 2025)**\nUnder **Part II, Item 7 – Results of Operations** (and the section *Gross Profit and Gross Margin*):\n* In the table setting forth items in the **Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue** for the year ended January 26, 2025 (Fiscal Year 2025):\n * **Revenue:** $100.0\\%$\n * **Cost of revenue:** $25.0\\%$\n * **Gross profit:** **$75.0\\%$**\n\nFurthermore, the filing explicitly states:\n> *\"Gross margins increased to 75.0% in fiscal year 2025 from 72.7% in fiscal year 2024. The year over year increase was primarily driven by a higher mix of Data Center revenue.\"*", "correctness": 85, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 75.0% matches the reference's own stated reported figure and is consistent with the reference's calculated 74.99% after rounding to one decimal. It did not show the dollar-based calculation from the income statement, which the reference uses, so it is not fully complete. Its claims are supported by the tool output: the percentage-of-revenue table (Revenue 100.0, Cost of revenue 25.0, Gross profit 75.0), the quoted MD&A sentence 'Gross margins increased to 75.0% in fiscal year 2025 from 72.7%', the January 26, 2025 fiscal year end, and the accession number. The cited Item 7 heading is an inference from the Results of Operations section rather than an explicit heading in the excerpt. The $97,858M and $130,497M figures in the reference's gold evidence were not retrieved in the tool output, so the candidate cannot be credited for them.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04430865, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04184175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024669, "wall_seconds": 39.75362527699872, "api_seconds": 38.51738978300091, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 5, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 70808, "completion_tokens": 1930, "reasoning_tokens": 619, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8b7356c142ee00f47394d888.json", "detail_js": "details/8b7356c142ee00f47394d888.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8b7356c142ee00f47394d888.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/03446a64e91d4310ba9316099e2baa37.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e0988126c43b455f93a79f06122f4a1b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "12f19b9e1e4f0d5ab4775d1c", "question_id": "Q047", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin was 74.99% (reported as 75.0%), calculated as Gross profit ($97,858 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s gross profit margin for fiscal year 2025 was **75.0%**. The filing’s income statement expresses gross profit as a percentage of revenue; equivalently, gross profit ÷ revenue × 100 = **75.0%**.\n\n**Source:** NVIDIA FY2025 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. The “Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue” table reports gross profit of 75.0% for the year ended January 26, 2025 (SQL evidence: text located at character position 223,820).", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 75.0% matches the reference's stated reported figure (74.99%, reported as 75.0%), and the fiscal year end (Jan 26, 2025) is correct. It omits the underlying gross profit and revenue figures and the unrounded 74.99%, so it is slightly less complete than the reference. The cited accession, file_id, and character position match the tool output, and the 75.0% gross margin appears in both the percentage-of-revenue table and the FY2025 summary table.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002481975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001348775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011332, "wall_seconds": 28.05062852300034, "api_seconds": 26.57134154099731, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31917, "completion_tokens": 1173, "reasoning_tokens": 446, "cache_read_tokens": 16170, "excerpt_characters": 7100, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/12f19b9e1e4f0d5ab4775d1c.json", "detail_js": "details/12f19b9e1e4f0d5ab4775d1c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/12f19b9e1e4f0d5ab4775d1c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/408849ca8d7a4f278a0f6cbd0027ce51.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2d92c61a70e64d14a8d898457c6a0e48.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e676440dc888264ce7ca273a", "question_id": "Q047", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin was 74.99% (reported as 75.0%), calculated as Gross profit ($97,858 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s fiscal 2025 gross profit margin was **75.0%**.\n\nCalculation from the Consolidated Statements of Income: gross profit **$97,858 million** ÷ revenue **$130,497 million** × 100 = **74.99%**, or **75.0%** rounded.\n\nThe 10-K’s table of income statement items as a percentage of revenue also reports gross profit at 75.0% for the year ended January 26, 2025 (filing `0001045810-25-000023`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, characters 222,819–234,819).", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's answer matches the reference: 75.0% reported, and 97,858 / 130,497 = 74.99%. Its figures are arithmetically correct and it gives both the exact and rounded values. Citation support is partial. The tool output supports the 75.0% gross margin, the $130,497M total revenue (segment table), and the MD&A percentage table at characters 222,819–234,819. However, the $97,858M gross profit figure never appears in any tool output. The three 'CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME' and '130,497' searches returned no income-statement table, so the claim that the figure comes from the Consolidated Statements of Income is not verified by the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00408557, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00211007, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019755, "wall_seconds": 30.31079736999891, "api_seconds": 28.984612618995016, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 55977, "completion_tokens": 1448, "reasoning_tokens": 654, "cache_read_tokens": 27977, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/e676440dc888264ce7ca273a.json", "detail_js": "details/e676440dc888264ce7ca273a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e676440dc888264ce7ca273a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e4863c8c25f84153ad62962f03289207.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/32c7b34d5bde4923a8541778a8742479.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f3f15b3e7a566f5e0810d4ca", "question_id": "Q048", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin in fiscal year 2025 was 62.42%, calculated as Operating income ($81,453 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (filing `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Financial Data for Fiscal Year 2025 (Year Ended January 26, 2025)**\n- **Operating Income:** **$81,453 million**\n- **Revenue:** **$130,497 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Operating Margin Calculation**\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating Income}}{\\text{Revenue}} = \\frac{\\$81,453\\text{ million}}{\\$130,497\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.624175\\text{ or } \\mathbf{62.42\\%}$$\n\nIn the filing's table expressing items in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of revenue, NVIDIA reports Operating income as **62.4%** of revenue.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives 62.42%, calculated as $81,453M / $130,497M. The candidate gets the same value: 0.624175, or 62.42%. Its inputs match the tool output: Operating income $81,453 (Consolidated Statements of Income and segment table) and total Revenue $130,497 (segment table). Its fiscal year-end date of January 26, 2025 and the 62.4% figure from the percentage-of-revenue table are also in the retrieved text. The candidate does not quote the exact gold line ('| Operating income | 81453 | 32972 | 4224 |'), but the same figures appear in the tool outputs, so citation support is strong. The small deduction reflects that the cited Income Statement line is not reproduced verbatim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02184775, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.020792249999999998, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010555, "wall_seconds": 29.90156747400033, "api_seconds": 28.004870736998782, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30823, "completion_tokens": 1491, "reasoning_tokens": 450, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/f3f15b3e7a566f5e0810d4ca.json", "detail_js": "details/f3f15b3e7a566f5e0810d4ca.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f3f15b3e7a566f5e0810d4ca.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2c375d326e3a434da28e273c584cc063.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3c9b9bd9e7a5402890c13cdce4e24b02.request.json" }, { "task_id": "26f893eab83030b493c3164a", "question_id": "Q048", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin in fiscal year 2025 was 62.42%, calculated as Operating income ($81,453 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Stated Percentage of Revenue**\nIn Part II, Item 7 (*Results of Operations*), the table setting forth items from the Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue reports:\n* **Operating income as a % of revenue:** **62.4%**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation from Operating Income and Revenue**\nFrom the Reportable Segments / Results of Operations data for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025:\n* **Operating income:** **$81,453 million**\n * *Compute & Networking:* $82,875 million \n * *Graphics:* $5,085 million \n * *All Other:* $(6,507) million \n * *Total Operating Income:* $81,453 million\n* **Revenue:** **$130,497 million**\n * *Compute & Networking:* $116,193 million \n * *Graphics:* $14,304 million \n * *Total Revenue:* $130,497 million\n\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating income}}{\\text{Revenue}} = \\frac{\\$81,453\\text{ million}}{\\$130,497\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.624175 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{62.42\\%}$$ \n*(reported as **62.4%** in the percentage of revenue table)*.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's final answer of 62.42% matches the reference. Its inputs are correct: operating income of $81,453M and revenue of $130,497M, and 81453/130497 ≈ 0.624175. The segment figures and the reported 62.4% percentage-of-revenue table also match the tool output. Citation support is strong because the figures, the fiscal year-end date, and the accession and file identifiers all appear in the retrieved text. It is slightly weaker because the gold quote (the Item 8 income statement row) was never retrieved, and the candidate's Item 7 attribution is inferred rather than explicitly labeled in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0412894, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0398535, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014359, "wall_seconds": 37.47315783900012, "api_seconds": 35.55590125899653, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58932, "completion_tokens": 1713, "reasoning_tokens": 489, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/26f893eab83030b493c3164a.json", "detail_js": "details/26f893eab83030b493c3164a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/26f893eab83030b493c3164a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/70ef01fcfcfb4ef5a1054404caa0d7ca.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9a5750d931fb4f8bb34de94eba1d2093.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a2fe7d1f1457c6afa29bebcb", "question_id": "Q048", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin in fiscal year 2025 was 62.42%, calculated as Operating income ($81,453 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s fiscal 2025 operating margin was **62.4%**.\n\nThe filing’s fiscal-year table gives operating income as **62.4% of revenue** for the year ended January 26, 2025—equivalent to Operating income ÷ Revenue × 100. (10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; filing identifies NVIDIA and reports the “Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue.”)", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 93, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference computes 81,453 / 130,497 = 62.42%. The candidate reports 62.4%, which is the same value rounded to one decimal, and the filing's own percentage table shows 62.4 for operating income in the year ended Jan 26, 2025. The candidate does not give the dollar inputs or the unrounded 62.42%, so it is slightly less precise than the reference but not wrong. Citation support is strong: the tool output contains the 'Operating income | 62.4' row, the 'expressed as a percentage of revenue' phrase, the filing accession, and the segment totals of $81,453M operating income and $130,497M revenue. The candidate's cited file and accession match the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0025760600000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00139416, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011819, "wall_seconds": 27.233794104999106, "api_seconds": 25.769699252994542, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32576, "completion_tokens": 1307, "reasoning_tokens": 504, "cache_read_tokens": 16616, "excerpt_characters": 5550, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a2fe7d1f1457c6afa29bebcb.json", "detail_js": "details/a2fe7d1f1457c6afa29bebcb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a2fe7d1f1457c6afa29bebcb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ac00c9f729bb47e28ab5fc9cf6780575.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/72c034a4993c481fa7d7105bf67fb6e8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e2cc11bfc0319e33a9a6f228", "question_id": "Q048", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2025, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's operating margin in fiscal year 2025 was 62.42%, calculated as Operating income ($81,453 million) divided by Revenue ($130,497 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s fiscal 2025 operating margin was **about 62.4%**.\n\nThe filing reports fiscal 2025 revenue of **$130,497 million** and operating income of **$81,453 million**. Calculation: $81,453 million ÷ $130,497 million × 100 = **62.416%**, or **62.4%** rounded to one decimal. The filing’s percentage-of-revenue table also reports operating income as 62.4%.\n\n**Source:** NVIDIA Form 10-K, file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the fiscal-year figures and percentage table appear in the filing passage returned at character offsets 222,819–234,819.", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's headline answer of about 62.4% matches the reference's 62.42% once rounding is accounted for. The inputs are right: revenue $130,497M and operating income $81,453M. The one flaw is the intermediate figure: 81,453 / 130,497 = 62.417%, not 62.416%. This does not change the rounded answer. Citation support is strong. The tool output shows the revenue total ($130497) and operating income total ($81453) in the segment tables, and the percentage-of-revenue table lists operating income at 62.4, all in the passage at offsets 222,819–234,819 that the candidate cites. The gold quote in the form '| Operating income | 81453 | 32972 | 4224 |' does not appear verbatim in the retrieved text, so the candidate's citation is supported by the tool evidence but is not the exact gold row.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00420193, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00209793, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.002104, "wall_seconds": 30.902205225000216, "api_seconds": 30.01263492399994, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 52708, "completion_tokens": 1598, "reasoning_tokens": 777, "cache_read_tokens": 23963, "excerpt_characters": 25000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/e2cc11bfc0319e33a9a6f228.json", "detail_js": "details/e2cc11bfc0319e33a9a6f228.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e2cc11bfc0319e33a9a6f228.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ddc6f568238b4517a2b3aeef4280252a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fe7cfb30700243ed9b854518b8ac809c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2c00c7056363cb0503815e38", "question_id": "Q049", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2025 (Net cash provided by operating activities minus Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets).", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2025 was $60,853 million ($60.853 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($64,089 million) minus capital expenditures ($3,236 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem: `0001045810-25-000023`, from file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the **Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows** report the following figures (in millions):\n\n- **Net cash provided by operating activities**: **$64,089 million**\n- **Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets**: **$3,236 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Free Cash Flow Calculation:**\n$$\\begin{aligned}\n\\text{Free Cash Flow} &= \\text{Net cash provided by operating activities} - \\text{Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets} \\\\\n&= \\$64,089\\text{ million} - \\$3,236\\text{ million} \\\\\n&= \\mathbf{\\$60,853\\text{ million}} \\quad (\\text{or } \\mathbf{\\$60.853\\text{ billion}})\n\\end{aligned}$$", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference: operating cash flow of $64,089M, capex of $3,236M, and free cash flow of $60,853M ($60.853B). The arithmetic is correct and units are in millions. The fiscal year end of January 26, 2025 is supported by the tool output ('CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20250126'). The cash flow statement rows returned by the tool directly show 64089 for net cash from operations and (3236) for purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets, so both inputs are supported by tool evidence. The answer does not cite the statement's section heading in the tool output, and the citation is slightly less precise than it could be, so citation_support is 95 rather than 100.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0336642, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0324405, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012237, "wall_seconds": 35.22029073399972, "api_seconds": 32.51798079199398, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47406, "completion_tokens": 1617, "reasoning_tokens": 229, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/2c00c7056363cb0503815e38.json", "detail_js": "details/2c00c7056363cb0503815e38.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2c00c7056363cb0503815e38.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/02ac200700a04f12b7c7d283951d6567.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a4ce3e36024d43adbe35aeb9af7b1c35.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9ece3a65506c8a8e21a65df2", "question_id": "Q049", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2025 (Net cash provided by operating activities minus Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets).", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2025 was $60,853 million ($60.853 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($64,089 million) minus capital expenditures ($3,236 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Components (in millions)**\n* **Net cash provided by operating activities:** **$64,089 million**\n* **Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets:** **$3,236 million**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation**\n$$\\text{Free Cash Flow} = \\text{Net cash provided by operating activities} - \\text{Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets}$$\n\n$$\\text{Free Cash Flow} = \\$64,089 - \\$3,236 = \\mathbf{\\$60,853\\text{ million}}$$\n\n---\n\n*(Note: In NVIDIA's Form 8-K earnings release definition of Free Cash Flow (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000021`), they also deduct \"Principal payments on property and equipment and intangible assets\" of $129 million, which would result in $\\$64,089 - \\$3,236 - \\$129 = \\mathbf{\\$60,724\\text{ million}}$. Under the formula specified in your prompt, the result is **$60,853 million**).*", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the reference. Operating cash flow of $64,089M minus purchases of property and equipment and intangibles of $3,236M gives $60,853M, and the tool output shows both figures in the 10-K cash flow statement. The main deduction is a minor attribution issue. The candidate says the $129M principal payments figure comes from the 8-K (0001045810-25-000021), but the retrieved 8-K text was truncated before its cash flow table, and the $129M appears in the 10-K cash flow statement. The 8-K's FCF definition is supported, so the alternative $60,724M figure is a reasonable side note, but its sourcing is slightly overstated.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05998945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05745525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025342, "wall_seconds": 45.1555095190015, "api_seconds": 43.206250909997834, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 93694, "completion_tokens": 1651, "reasoning_tokens": 422, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9ece3a65506c8a8e21a65df2.json", "detail_js": "details/9ece3a65506c8a8e21a65df2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9ece3a65506c8a8e21a65df2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/04a9282f1e414776a5cadd93bd94e99b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9645afcc60694f7b9a29eee795e80146.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e15ff71714de399c5b04c68a", "question_id": "Q049", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2025 (Net cash provided by operating activities minus Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets).", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2025 was $60,853 million ($60.853 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($64,089 million) minus capital expenditures ($3,236 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA reported **$64,089 million** of net cash provided by operating activities and **$3,236 million** of purchases related to property, equipment, and intangible assets for fiscal 2025.\n\n**Free cash flow = $64,089 million − $3,236 million = $60,853 million** (**$60.853 billion**).\n\nSource: NVIDIA FY2025 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`. The cash-flow values appear in the passage beginning at character 276,200; operating cash flow appears in the passage beginning at character 234,350.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference exactly: operating cash flow of $64,089M, capex of $3,236M, and free cash flow of $60,853M ($60.853B). The arithmetic is correct (64,089 − 3,236 = 60,853). The tool outputs support every figure. The purchases line (3236) appears in the passage at offset 276200, and the operating cash flow line (64089) appears in the passage at offset 234350. The accession number and file ID match the tool results. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not state the fiscal year-end date (January 26, 2025), though the tool evidence contains it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00273473, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00145943, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012753, "wall_seconds": 28.156771208001373, "api_seconds": 25.404718526999204, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 38165, "completion_tokens": 1361, "reasoning_tokens": 488, "cache_read_tokens": 21398, "excerpt_characters": 6300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/e15ff71714de399c5b04c68a.json", "detail_js": "details/e15ff71714de399c5b04c68a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e15ff71714de399c5b04c68a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/043ade3b5840445f91210c01b316286c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/80e509198e7c4bf08e9a47f6d7f29aa6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f226cce223017ad0421fc49d", "question_id": "Q049", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow for fiscal year 2025 (Net cash provided by operating activities minus Purchases related to property and equipment and intangible assets).", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation's Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2025 was $60,853 million ($60.853 billion), calculated as Net cash provided by operating activities ($64,089 million) minus capital expenditures ($3,236 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA reported fiscal 2025 net cash provided by operating activities of **$64,089 million** and purchases related to property, equipment, and intangible assets of **$3,236 million**.\n\n**Free cash flow = $64,089 million − $3,236 million = $60,853 million** (about **$60.9 billion**).\n\nSource: NVIDIA FY2025 Form 10-K, filing `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; cash-flow statement at character offsets 275,681–287,681. The filing reports amounts in millions.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: operating cash flow of $64,089M minus purchases related to property, equipment and intangible assets of $3,236M gives $60,853M, and the rounded $60.9B is consistent. Units (millions) are correctly stated. The cited accession 0001045810-25-000023 and character offsets 275,681–287,681 match the read_filing output, and the tool output shows the $64,089 and $(3236) line items in the cash-flow statement. Citation support is slightly below perfect only because the offset range is cited without noting that the operating cash flow line appears in the earlier retrieved chunk, a minor presentation gap rather than an error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003531705, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001781705, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.00175, "wall_seconds": 23.896725528999013, "api_seconds": 22.547905636001815, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 39951, "completion_tokens": 1030, "reasoning_tokens": 292, "cache_read_tokens": 13718, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/f226cce223017ad0421fc49d.json", "detail_js": "details/f226cce223017ad0421fc49d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f226cce223017ad0421fc49d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/588d848d1aa54de480c53fffb226b0c0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6fbe46cc77e6481495bf750113a0dd9f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "205fee452567b1d4c899613b", "question_id": "Q050", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What percentage of Intel Corporation's total 2024 revenue ($53.1 billion) was invested into Research and Development ($16.5 billion)?", "reference": "Intel Corporation invested 31.07% of its total 2024 revenue into R&D ($16.5 billion R&D / $53.1 billion revenue).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the figures provided in the prompt:\n\n- **2024 Research and Development Expense:** $16.5 billion \n- **2024 Total Revenue:** $53.1 billion \n\n### Calculation:\n$$\\text{Percentage} = \\frac{\\$16.5\\text{ billion}}{\\$53.1\\text{ billion}} \\times 100 \\approx 31.0734\\%$$\n\nRounded to:\n- **Two decimal places:** **31.07%** (or **31.1%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 16.5 / 53.1 × 100 = 31.0734%, which rounds to 31.07% as the reference states, and the one-decimal alternative of 31.1% is also correct. The inputs match the reference. Citation support is only partial. The candidate cites nothing and relies on 'figures provided in the prompt.' The tool output confirms the arithmetic (pct = 31.0734). The filing search found '53.1' in the 10-K text and a 'research and development' hit, but no tool output shows the $16.5 billion R&D quote from the gold evidence. The tool also returned a second value (31.08) from using 53,081 in thousands, which the candidate correctly did not use. Missing a direct citation to the R&D figure keeps the support score moderate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0302904, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.029082, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012084, "wall_seconds": 41.67269768499864, "api_seconds": 39.76640901999781, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 42640, "completion_tokens": 1644, "reasoning_tokens": 440, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000074" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/205fee452567b1d4c899613b.json", "detail_js": "details/205fee452567b1d4c899613b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/205fee452567b1d4c899613b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7b1e6af1e8b64bca92a61b2d4998f73c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6bbd53f1588e46f59c4bae291f999a4d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0140a2d3227962424e1124be", "question_id": "Q050", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What percentage of Intel Corporation's total 2024 revenue ($53.1 billion) was invested into Research and Development ($16.5 billion)?", "reference": "Intel Corporation invested 31.07% of its total 2024 revenue into R&D ($16.5 billion R&D / $53.1 billion revenue).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000050863-25-000009`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Consolidated Statements of Operations, page 57):\n\n- **Total Net Revenue (2024):** $53,101 million ($53.101 billion, or ~$53.1 billion)\n- **Research and Development (R&D) Expense (2024):** $16,546 million ($16.546 billion, or ~$16.5 billion)\n\n### Percentage Calculation:\n- **Using the figures stated in the question ($16.5 billion / $53.1 billion):**\n $$\\frac{16.5}{53.1} \\times 100\\% \\approx 31.0734\\% \\approx \\mathbf{31.1\\%}$$\n\n- **Using the exact filing figures ($16,546 million / $53,101 million):**\n $$\\frac{16,546}{53,101} \\times 100\\% \\approx 31.1595\\% \\approx \\mathbf{31.2\\%}$$", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is 31.07% using the question's rounded figures ($16.5B / $53.1B). The candidate reports 31.1% for that same calculation, which is the correct one-decimal rounding of 31.0734%. It also gives an exact-figure version: $16,546M / $53,101M = 31.1595%, which rounds to 31.2%. That arithmetic is correct. The candidate's R&D ($16,546M) and revenue ($53,101M) figures, the accession, the file_stem, and the page 57 citation all match the Consolidated Statements of Operations text in the tool output. The gold quote from MD&A ('$16.5 billion in R&D') was not retrieved by the tools, but the candidate's cited statement supports the same figures. The main deduction is that the candidate presents two percentages without stating which one answers the question directly. Both are arithmetically correct and clearly labeled.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05595415, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05281425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0031399, "wall_seconds": 41.63523011600046, "api_seconds": 40.22405890500522, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 93838, "completion_tokens": 1596, "reasoning_tokens": 451, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0140a2d3227962424e1124be.json", "detail_js": "details/0140a2d3227962424e1124be.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0140a2d3227962424e1124be.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bfec346e5f7140f09b8e7f10e79d4f11.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a0f63b6a76f44bceaa41f13a6d75b347.request.json" }, { "task_id": "31a3078c0e9cd140185f6d2b", "question_id": "Q050", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What percentage of Intel Corporation's total 2024 revenue ($53.1 billion) was invested into Research and Development ($16.5 billion)?", "reference": "Intel Corporation invested 31.07% of its total 2024 revenue into R&D ($16.5 billion R&D / $53.1 billion revenue).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel invested approximately **31.1%** of its 2024 revenue in Research and Development:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{\\$16.5\\text{ billion}}{\\$53.1\\text{ billion}}\\times 100 \\approx 31.1\\%\n\\]\n\nThe 2024 10-K identifies Intel Corporation and reports R&D expense of $16,546 million, or 31.2% of revenue in its percentage column; using the rounded figures in your question gives 31.1%. Evidence: filing `0000050863-25-000009`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` (the R&D line and consolidated revenue discussion).", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "16.5/53.1 = 31.07%, so the candidate's 31.1% is correct to one decimal and matches the reference. Its note that the filing's R&D line (16,546 million) shows 31.2% of revenue is supported by the tool output, which shows 'Research and development | 16546 | 31.2%'. The 2024 revenue of $53.1 billion is also supported by the consolidated revenue text. The $16.5 billion figure from the gold quote does not appear verbatim in the tool output, but the 16,546 line supports it. Minor deduction because the 31.2% figure is from the filing's own rounding and could confuse a reader, though it is labeled as such.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0028574, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0014778, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013796, "wall_seconds": 29.773363006999716, "api_seconds": 28.495356239000103, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 37731, "completion_tokens": 1494, "reasoning_tokens": 567, "cache_read_tokens": 20390, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000050863-25-000074", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/31a3078c0e9cd140185f6d2b.json", "detail_js": "details/31a3078c0e9cd140185f6d2b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/31a3078c0e9cd140185f6d2b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9758d77f72e444d094f3ad61d2d1e286.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dd4b53463952497184c6eb1267fe6b77.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6a0ac77079591911d9c37245", "question_id": "Q050", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What percentage of Intel Corporation's total 2024 revenue ($53.1 billion) was invested into Research and Development ($16.5 billion)?", "reference": "Intel Corporation invested 31.07% of its total 2024 revenue into R&D ($16.5 billion R&D / $53.1 billion revenue).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel invested **about 31.1%** of its 2024 revenue in R&D:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{\\$16.5\\text{ billion}}{\\$53.1\\text{ billion}}\\times100 \\approx 31.1\\%\n\\]\n\nThat’s roughly **31 cents of every revenue dollar**. I verified Intel’s identity in its 2024 annual filing (file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`); the percentage uses the revenue and R&D figures in your question.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $16.5B / $53.1B = 31.07%, which the candidate rounds to 31.1%. The 'about 31 cents' framing is also consistent. The date and units are right, and the answer addresses the question. The small deduction reflects the reduced precision versus the reference's 31.07%. For citation support, the tool output does show Intel's CIK (0000050863) and the 2024 filing stem 0000050863-25-000009, with Intel-specific text (intc-20241228 images, Intel process/R&D discussion), so the claim to have verified Intel's identity is partly supported. However, the retrieved excerpt never shows the '$16.5 billion R&D' sentence from the gold evidence, and the candidate cites no quote for the figures, so the figures rest on the user's question rather than on retrieved evidence. That gap keeps citation support moderate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0023725400000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00110194, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012706, "wall_seconds": 14.881471852999312, "api_seconds": 14.583424913000272, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 22160, "completion_tokens": 1032, "reasoning_tokens": 411, "cache_read_tokens": 5789, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/6a0ac77079591911d9c37245.json", "detail_js": "details/6a0ac77079591911d9c37245.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6a0ac77079591911d9c37245.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/095f71c894904093bec536d5814ff198.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7b3b09c210d5492d80032b73c1d57702.request.json" }, { "task_id": "80434e6a63dc4588c0867995", "question_id": "Q051", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin in fiscal year 2024 was 89.04%, calculated as Gross profit ($19,147 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s **Consolidated Statements of Income** in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (file stem: `0000796343-25-000004`, from `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Financial Data for Fiscal Year 2024**\n*(Amounts in millions)*\n* **Total revenue:** $\\$21,505$\n* **Total cost of revenue:** $\\$2,358$\n* **Gross profit:** $\\$19,147$\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation of Gross Profit Margin Percentage**\n\n$$\\text{Gross Profit Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Gross Profit}}{\\text{Total Revenue}} \\times 100$$\n\n$$\\text{Gross Profit Margin} = \\frac{\\$19,147}{\\$21,505} \\times 100 \\approx 89.0351\\% \\approx \\mathbf{89.04\\%}$$", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 89.04% matches the reference and the arithmetic checks out: 19,147 / 21,505 = 0.89035, or 89.04% to two decimals. Its inputs (total revenue $21,505M, total cost of revenue $2,358M, gross profit $19,147M) and the fiscal year end of November 29, 2024 all appear in the Consolidated Statements of Income output in the tool evidence. The accession 0000796343-25-000004 and the source parquet file are also confirmed by the header query. Citation support is near-full because the figures and identifiers are directly traceable to tool output; the small deduction is only because the candidate's Total revenue and cost lines are not quoted verbatim in the gold evidence, though they are present in the tool results.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0387119, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0373995, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013124, "wall_seconds": 31.911740155001098, "api_seconds": 29.640307306999603, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55560, "completion_tokens": 1486, "reasoning_tokens": 191, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/80434e6a63dc4588c0867995.json", "detail_js": "details/80434e6a63dc4588c0867995.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/80434e6a63dc4588c0867995.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/972d444fc8e9459ebc78a63087fb25e3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8e9bc073653f41dfa9f860ca08c2f176.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1ca3505f242fe62b2945508e", "question_id": "Q051", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin in fiscal year 2024 was 89.04%, calculated as Gross profit ($19,147 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "From Adobe Inc.'s **Consolidated Statements of Income** in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (file stem: `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, page 55):\n\n### **Reported Figures (in millions)**\n* **Total revenue:** $\\$21,505$\n * Subscription: $\\$20,521$\n * Product: $\\$386$\n * Services and other: $\\$598$\n* **Total cost of revenue:** $\\$2,358$\n * Subscription: $\\$1,799$\n * Product: $\\$25$\n * Services and other: $\\$534$\n* **Gross profit:** $\\$19,147$\n\n---\n\n### **Gross Profit Margin Calculation**\n$$\\text{Gross Profit Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Gross Profit}}{\\text{Total Revenue}} = \\frac{\\$19,147}{\\$21,505} \\approx 0.89035108 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{89.04\\%}$$\n\n*(Rounded to one decimal place: **89.0%**; rounded to four decimal places: **89.0351%**)*", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence. Total revenue is $21,505M, gross profit is $19,147M, and 19,147/21,505 = 0.890351, which rounds to 89.04%. The one-decimal rounding (89.0%) and four-decimal form (89.0351%) are also correct. The subscription, product, services, and cost-of-revenue breakdowns match the Consolidated Statements of Income in the read_filing output. The fiscal year end (November 29, 2024) and accession 0000796343-25-000004 match the filing header. Page 55 matches the table of contents shown in the tool output. The minor deduction is that the page citation comes from the TOC rather than a page marker in the statement text itself.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03080105, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02917875, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016223, "wall_seconds": 28.491320047000045, "api_seconds": 26.93742698800088, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 47673, "completion_tokens": 1491, "reasoning_tokens": 318, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 13500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/1ca3505f242fe62b2945508e.json", "detail_js": "details/1ca3505f242fe62b2945508e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1ca3505f242fe62b2945508e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9b0bf708b0e14369b3e158ebb2f2c38f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d827d28af10047f983bb957421d12afb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "660c6497846f9cfa9171889b", "question_id": "Q051", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin in fiscal year 2024 was 89.04%, calculated as Gross profit ($19,147 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe’s fiscal 2024 gross profit margin was **89.04%**.\n\nFrom its Consolidated Statements of Income, gross profit was **$19,147 million** and total revenue was **$21,505 million**. Calculation: $19,147 ÷ $21,505 × 100 = **89.04%**.\n\nSource: Adobe Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; statement excerpt at approximately character offset 255,647.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 89.04% gross margin matches the reference. Gross profit of $19,147M and total revenue of $21,505M both appear in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended November 29, 2024, and 19,147 / 21,505 = 89.04%. The tool output directly shows these figures in the income statement table, along with the file_id, file_stem, and the strpos result of 255,647 for the statement offset, so the cited source is well supported. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not restate the fiscal year-end date, though it correctly identifies fiscal 2024.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00262351, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00137301, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012505, "wall_seconds": 21.40445165500023, "api_seconds": 20.231694439995408, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33751, "completion_tokens": 1094, "reasoning_tokens": 382, "cache_read_tokens": 16346, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/660c6497846f9cfa9171889b.json", "detail_js": "details/660c6497846f9cfa9171889b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/660c6497846f9cfa9171889b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9aa5d587f9e84dfc8cb7e411b2647f40.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7852d479f78d42f7bca3506f639ec595.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a36dbf71d0b4e05ca8672bba", "question_id": "Q051", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated from its Consolidated Statements of Income?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s gross profit margin in fiscal year 2024 was 89.04%, calculated as Gross profit ($19,147 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe’s fiscal 2024 gross profit margin was **89.0%**.\n\nCalculation from the Consolidated Statements of Income: gross profit **$19,147 million** ÷ total revenue **$21,505 million** × 100 = **89.04%**, or **89.0%** rounded to one decimal place.\n\nSource: filing `0000796343-25-000004`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, statement passage at character offsets **248430–260430**.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $19,147M / $21,505M = 89.04%, and it reports 89.0% at one decimal, consistent with the reference. The gross profit and total revenue figures match the Consolidated Statements of Income in the read_filing output. The accession, parquet file, and character offsets 248430–260430 all match the tool evidence. Minor deduction only because the headline uses the rounded 89.0% rather than the reference's 89.04%, though both are shown.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00287511, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0015163099999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013588, "wall_seconds": 20.271640294000463, "api_seconds": 19.784357736001766, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30622, "completion_tokens": 982, "reasoning_tokens": 313, "cache_read_tokens": 9851, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a36dbf71d0b4e05ca8672bba.json", "detail_js": "details/a36dbf71d0b4e05ca8672bba.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a36dbf71d0b4e05ca8672bba.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3ca6fd8149d0453cbc0ae21840019b29.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/569852642b37411589fe1d8f8be30ecf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0046d80e5a3e758d2382e4e5", "question_id": "Q052", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total revenue?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 31.35%, calculated as Operating income ($6,741 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (Accession Number / `file_stem`: `0000796343-25-000004`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), from the **Consolidated Statements of Income** (amounts in millions):\n\n- **Operating income**: $6,741 million\n- **Total revenue**: $21,505 million\n\n### **Operating Margin Percentage Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating income}}{\\text{Total revenue}} = \\frac{\\$6,741}{\\$21,505} \\approx 0.313462 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{31.35\\%}$$ (or **31.3%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence. Operating income is $6,741M and total revenue is $21,505M, both from the Consolidated Statements of Income in accession 0000796343-25-000004. 6741/21505 = 0.313462, so 31.35% is correct. The alternative 31.3% rounding is also valid. The fiscal year end date (November 29, 2024) and file identifiers are supported by the tool output. The only minor issue is presenting two rounded forms, which is harmless.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03835975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03690975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.00145, "wall_seconds": 33.17109845599953, "api_seconds": 31.20364313900427, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56358, "completion_tokens": 1471, "reasoning_tokens": 418, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0046d80e5a3e758d2382e4e5.json", "detail_js": "details/0046d80e5a3e758d2382e4e5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0046d80e5a3e758d2382e4e5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9a1e12557cbd4c4099b65a351fa597e2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0a9e7993922746ccb179718d8e1a1a44.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ad4acf179ce3a567b3f287ca", "question_id": "Q052", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total revenue?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 31.35%, calculated as Operating income ($6,741 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "From Adobe Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Consolidated Statements of Income):\n\n### **Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Figures:**\n- **Operating income:** **$6,741 million**\n- **Total revenue:** **$21,505 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Operating Margin Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Operating Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating Income}}{\\text{Total Revenue}} = \\frac{6,741}{21,505} \\approx 0.313462 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{31.35\\%}$$\n\nAdobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 was approximately **31.35%** (or **31.3%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's inputs match the reference and the tool evidence: Operating income of $6,741M and Total revenue of $21,505M for fiscal year ended November 29, 2024, both shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income retrieved by read_filing. The ratio 6741/21505 is about 0.313465, which rounds to 31.35%, matching the reference. The candidate's intermediate figure of 0.313462 is slightly off in the last digits but does not change the reported percentage. The 31.3% one-decimal rounding is also correct. Citation support is strong because the accession, section, and figures all appear in the tool output, with only a minor precision slip in the intermediate decimal.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0230835, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0215715, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001512, "wall_seconds": 21.102138668999032, "api_seconds": 20.652521258001798, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 38267, "completion_tokens": 1123, "reasoning_tokens": 355, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/ad4acf179ce3a567b3f287ca.json", "detail_js": "details/ad4acf179ce3a567b3f287ca.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ad4acf179ce3a567b3f287ca.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/180c7422a8434dd080c4decd7c62c69a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bb36066cbdc94c98a828f74f45865512.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7557f45d9340e657e9d8457e", "question_id": "Q052", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total revenue?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 31.35%, calculated as Operating income ($6,741 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Using the filing’s 2024 figures in **$ millions**: total revenue was **$21,505**, total cost of revenue **$2,358**, and total operating expenses **$12,406** (file_stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; SQL excerpts around characters 214,000–220,000).\n\nOperating income = $21,505 − $2,358 − $12,406 = **$6,741 million**. \nOperating margin = $6,741 ÷ $21,505 × 100 = **31.34%**.\n\nThe returned excerpts support the calculation, but do not show the company name, so I can’t independently verify the filing’s identity from the available evidence.", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is right: 6,741 / 21,505 = 31.344%, which rounds to 31.34%. The reference's 31.35% is a rounding error, so the candidate is more accurate than the reference on the final figure, but it does not match the reference value, which keeps the score below full. The inputs are supported by the tool output: total revenue 21505, cost of revenue 2358, and total operating expenses 12406, all in $ millions for fiscal 2024. Operating income of 6741 does not appear directly in the shown excerpts; the candidate derived it by subtraction, and it matches the gold evidence row. The candidate's identity caveat is reasonable, though the Creative Cloud and Document Cloud segment names in the excerpts and the CIK-matching accession would have supported the Adobe identification more firmly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.005837795, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003680095, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021577, "wall_seconds": 39.411588700999346, "api_seconds": 37.34532666599989, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 71317, "completion_tokens": 2012, "reasoning_tokens": 950, "cache_read_tokens": 31662, "excerpt_characters": 24200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7557f45d9340e657e9d8457e.json", "detail_js": "details/7557f45d9340e657e9d8457e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7557f45d9340e657e9d8457e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bd53219ae2114d4b9bb90c88752be00a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/378085e2970f45998910b69cfd16a927.request.json" }, { "task_id": "18b3fdd031cc1cd63de9e7c2", "question_id": "Q052", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s operating margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total revenue?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s operating margin in fiscal year 2024 was 31.35%, calculated as Operating income ($6,741 million) divided by Total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Adobe’s FY2024 operating margin was **31.35%**.\n\nCalculation: Operating income **$6,741 million** ÷ Total revenue **$21,505 million** × 100 = **31.35%**.\n\nSource: Adobe Inc. FY2024 Form 10-K, filing `0000796343-25-000004` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the consolidated income statement appears in the passage returned at character offsets **248,430–260,430**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 31.35% matches the reference. Recomputing 6,741 / 21,505 × 100 gives 31.35%. The tool output (read_filing, offsets 248430–260430) shows the Consolidated Statements of Income with Total revenue 21505 and Operating income 6741 for the year ended November 29, 2024, and the accession 0000796343-25-000004 matches. The candidate's figures, units ($ millions), fiscal-year labeling, and source offsets are all supported by the retrieved passage. Minor deduction only because the candidate's own quoted line is paraphrased rather than quoted verbatim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00472775, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00253475, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.002193, "wall_seconds": 32.348888768001416, "api_seconds": 31.228416773998106, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 64383, "completion_tokens": 1337, "reasoning_tokens": 441, "cache_read_tokens": 30265, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/18b3fdd031cc1cd63de9e7c2.json", "detail_js": "details/18b3fdd031cc1cd63de9e7c2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/18b3fdd031cc1cd63de9e7c2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3956aaf5937f465b99283f9c0aaef53b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fbab1de73e884c2bb80453b512b02dec.request.json" }, { "task_id": "26d755af17fbb0757cfe70f1", "question_id": "Q053", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s year-over-year percentage revenue growth from fiscal 2023 ($19,409 million) to fiscal 2024 ($21,505 million)?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total revenue grew by 10.80% in fiscal 2024 (calculated as ($21,505M - $19,409M) / $19,409M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Item 7, *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Revenue* table):\n\n### Revenue Data\n* **Fiscal 2024 Total Revenue:** $21,505 million\n* **Fiscal 2023 Total Revenue:** $19,409 million\n\n---\n\n### Calculation of Percentage Growth\n$$\\text{Percentage Revenue Growth} = \\frac{\\$21,505 - \\$19,409}{\\$19,409} \\times 100\\% = \\frac{\\$2,096}{\\$19,409} \\times 100\\% \\approx 10.7991\\%$$\n\n* **Exact / Rounded to two decimal places:** **10.80%** (or **10.7991%**)\n* **Reported in filing table (% Change 2024-2023):** **11%**", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 94, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: (21,505 - 19,409) / 19,409 = 10.7991%, which rounds to 10.80%, matching the reference. The candidate also correctly notes the filing's rounded 11% table value. The DuckDB output and the parsed filing snippet support both revenue figures, the 2024 and 2023 columns, the 11% change entry, the accession number, and the November 29, 2024 period end. The candidate labels the table as Item 7 MD&A; the snippet shows the revenue table under MD&A-style headings, which is plausible but not directly confirmed by the tool output. The reference cites the Item 8 income statement instead, but the figures match, so this does not affect correctness.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0345089, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0332985, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012104, "wall_seconds": 32.75704752099955, "api_seconds": 31.123215089995938, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48412, "completion_tokens": 1618, "reasoning_tokens": 331, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/26d755af17fbb0757cfe70f1.json", "detail_js": "details/26d755af17fbb0757cfe70f1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/26d755af17fbb0757cfe70f1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/16c16cbbe3054eef9ae0becbc59e03f4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fc9a3c6640374494a4315ec9b93bb7d7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2d7b04f6a9a37d92dd653c13", "question_id": "Q053", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s year-over-year percentage revenue growth from fiscal 2023 ($19,409 million) to fiscal 2024 ($21,505 million)?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total revenue grew by 10.80% in fiscal 2024 (calculated as ($21,505M - $19,409M) / $19,409M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K (filing ID `0000796343-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), total revenue was:\n\n* **Fiscal 2024:** $21,505 million\n* **Fiscal 2023:** $19,409 million\n\n### Calculation:\n\n$$\\text{Dollar Increase} = \\$21,505\\text{ million} - \\$19,409\\text{ million} = \\$2,096\\text{ million}$$\n\n$$\\text{Percentage Revenue Growth} = \\frac{\\$21,505 - \\$19,409}{\\$19,409} \\times 100\\% = \\frac{\\$2,096}{\\$19,409} \\times 100\\% \\approx 10.7991\\%$$\n\n* **Exact / Rounded:** Approximately **10.80%** (or **11%** as reported in Adobe's 10-K revenue table).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's revenue figures ($21,505M for fiscal 2024, $19,409M for fiscal 2023), dollar increase ($2,096M), and growth rate (10.7991%, rounded to 10.80%) all match the reference and the DuckDB arithmetic output. The accession number 0000796343-25-000004 and file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet match the tool evidence. The read_filing output contains the Consolidated revenue table with 21,505 and 19,409 and the reported 11% change, so the candidate's note about the 11% figure is also supported. The only minor issue is that the candidate's 'Form 10-K' label and the fiscal-year framing are inferred rather than explicitly stated in the retrieved text, which is a small deduction.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02380745, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02254425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012632, "wall_seconds": 24.982385805999, "api_seconds": 24.396688378999897, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 36791, "completion_tokens": 1180, "reasoning_tokens": 293, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2d7b04f6a9a37d92dd653c13.json", "detail_js": "details/2d7b04f6a9a37d92dd653c13.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2d7b04f6a9a37d92dd653c13.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/abce140db2e04a92bcba1d8bd93bf4e9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/01debea98c4248e89609afe9de6491cf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5", "question_id": "Q053", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s year-over-year percentage revenue growth from fiscal 2023 ($19,409 million) to fiscal 2024 ($21,505 million)?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total revenue grew by 10.80% in fiscal 2024 (calculated as ($21,505M - $19,409M) / $19,409M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Revenue increased by $2,096 million. The year-over-year growth was **about 10.8%**, calculated as \\((21{,}505-19{,}409) \\div 19{,}409 \\times 100\\).", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 15, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: the revenue increase is $2,096M, and (21,505 - 19,409) / 19,409 = 10.80%, matching the reference. It hedges with 'about 10.8%', which is acceptable. Citation support is weak. The tool outputs only show that accession 0000796343-25-000004 exists in the index with a large char_count. None of the tool evidence contains the revenue figures 21,505 or 19,409, so the candidate's inputs are not supported by retrieved evidence and no source is cited.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002017255, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001110255, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.000907, "wall_seconds": 23.341823164000743, "api_seconds": 22.705058260000442, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 19785, "completion_tokens": 1381, "reasoning_tokens": 668, "cache_read_tokens": 8558, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-018279", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019450", "0001628280-25-019451", "0001628280-25-019452", "0001628280-25-019457", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001628280-25-020297", "0001628280-25-020298", "0001628280-25-020302", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-020324", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000339", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5.json", "detail_js": "details/1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1c6a46f541939e707a4985d5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/638367c48d3848d0aa37e5ada6120a0c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/554eba7f65ab41608207f4798a04e409.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6", "question_id": "Q053", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Adobe Inc.'s year-over-year percentage revenue growth from fiscal 2023 ($19,409 million) to fiscal 2024 ($21,505 million)?", "reference": "Adobe Inc.'s total revenue grew by 10.80% in fiscal 2024 (calculated as ($21,505M - $19,409M) / $19,409M * 100).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Revenue increased by **$2,096 million** ($21,505 million − $19,409 million). Year-over-year growth was:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{21{,}505-19{,}409}{19{,}409}\\times100 \\approx \\mathbf{10.8\\%}\n\\]\n\nSo Adobe’s revenue grew **about 10.8%** from fiscal 2023 to fiscal 2024.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $21,505M minus $19,409M is $2,096M, and $2,096M / $19,409M is about 10.80%, matching the reference. The answer is complete and uses the correct units. Citation support is weak. The only tool evidence is a source listing and a DuckDB query for accession 796343 that returned no rows. Nothing in the tool output shows the revenue figures or the growth calculation. The revenue values appear to come from the user's question, not from retrieved filing text, and the gold quote does not appear in the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001209625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000610525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0005991, "wall_seconds": 12.17767184100012, "api_seconds": 12.050499182998465, "api_attempts": 4, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 3, "tool_requested": 2, "tool_processed": 2, "tool_dispatched": 2, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 1, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 9062, "completion_tokens": 883, "reasoning_tokens": 419, "cache_read_tokens": 2290, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6.json", "detail_js": "details/8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8baf5e91b5d8b2dd85c4b7a6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8bca41ebca1e4c708ef7e60cf61d069c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/13c8ba6b41284e96bb86a8f8ff63d05c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "85bbe156ec36eaac3a316a21", "question_id": "Q054", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, and what was the percentage point expansion compared to 2023?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin was 60.0% (60.04%) in fiscal year 2024 ($3,815.9 million on net revenues of $6,355.3 million), expanding by 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the available evidence retrieved within the tool budget, the relevant SEC filings (such as the 2024 Form 10-K) for Levi Strauss & Co. could not be located and accessed. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to determine Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage for fiscal year 2024 and its percentage point expansion compared to fiscal year 2023.", "correctness": 3, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives gross profit of 60.0% in FY2024 and 56.9% in FY2023, a 3.1 point expansion. The candidate abstained and gave no figures, so it is wrong on the core question, with only a trivial credit for not fabricating numbers. Its abstention is consistent with the tool trace, which shows failed SQL queries (binder, out-of-memory, and duplicate-ID errors), no Levi Strauss rows returned, and no 10-K retrieved. The claim that the filing could not be located is therefore supported by the tool outputs, though the search was poorly executed and never reached the correct filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03015715, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02918175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009754, "wall_seconds": 69.83600151199971, "api_seconds": 69.02887700099927, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 42318, "completion_tokens": 1269, "reasoning_tokens": 228, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000894189-25-000547", "0000905148-25-000020", "0000950170-25-000157", "0001062993-25-001366", "0001089063-25-000002", "0001145549-25-001864", "0001145549-25-001865", "0001145549-25-001866", "0001145549-25-001867", "0001145549-25-001868", "0001145549-25-001869", "0001493152-25-003725", "0001839882-25-001085", "0001839882-25-001086", "0001839882-25-002516", "0001839882-25-002518", "0001950047-25-000515", "0001972362-25-000002", "0001999371-25-000921", "0001999371-25-000927" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/85bbe156ec36eaac3a316a21.json", "detail_js": "details/85bbe156ec36eaac3a316a21.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/85bbe156ec36eaac3a316a21.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c21f03ae97b5492283e58509fa605ecf.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e619cc16f15a46da92299de459256ebf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "00549988c280d155564c21da", "question_id": "Q054", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, and what was the percentage point expansion compared to 2023?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin was 60.0% (60.04%) in fiscal year 2024 ($3,815.9 million on net revenues of $6,355.3 million), expanding by 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected, the relevant Form 10-K for Levi Strauss & Co. (file stem `0000094845-25-000005`, CIK `0000094845`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`) was located; however, the available tool budget was exhausted before retrieving the specific consolidated statement of operations or MD&A section containing the exact gross profit margin percentages and year-over-year basis point/percentage point expansion for fiscal year 2024 versus fiscal year 2023.\n\nTherefore, the evidence returned is **insufficient** to provide the exact gross profit margin percentage and percentage point expansion.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 75, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives gross profit of 3815.9 vs 3515.7 and margins of 60.0% and 56.9%, so the 3.1-point expansion follows. The candidate abstained and gave none of the required figures (margin, expansion, or dollar amounts), so it fails the core question. Its abstention is not justified because the question is answerable. Its citations are partly supported: the tool output does show the correct filing (accession 0000094845-25-000005, file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet), and the fetched 12k-character chunk does not contain the margin table, so 'insufficient evidence from the retrieved text' is accurate. However, the claim that the 'tool budget was exhausted' is not shown in the evidence, and the candidate never tried the obvious searches for 'Gross profit' with table markers that would have found the MD&A table, so the insufficiency claim is only partly supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02693875, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02565525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012835, "wall_seconds": 61.02661032099968, "api_seconds": 59.31322771400664, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 40467, "completion_tokens": 1315, "reasoning_tokens": 313, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/00549988c280d155564c21da.json", "detail_js": "details/00549988c280d155564c21da.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/00549988c280d155564c21da.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0983c719beec48f691d6f67c4690aaf0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/687708b8b8734add9242a158bbe8214c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3e646f58b80d337a3599c82d", "question_id": "Q054", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, and what was the percentage point expansion compared to 2023?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin was 60.0% (60.04%) in fiscal year 2024 ($3,815.9 million on net revenues of $6,355.3 million), expanding by 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned filing evidence confirms Levi Strauss & Co.’s fiscal year 2024 results, but it does not provide the gross profit margin percentages for 2024 and 2023. I therefore can’t determine the 2024 margin or its percentage-point expansion from the available evidence.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 75, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a definite answer: a 60.0% gross margin in FY2024, up 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023, sourced from a 10-K table row (accession 0000094845-25-000005). The question is answerable, so abstention is not fully correct. The candidate abstained and gave none of the required figures, so it earns little correctness credit, though it did not state any wrong numbers. Its citation support is fairly good: the retrieved snippets from accession 0000094845-25-000010 do not contain the margin percentages, which the candidate correctly reports. Its claim that the evidence 'confirms' FY2024 results is only loosely supported, since the snippets mention revenue and gross profit only in qualitative terms. The candidate never queried the 10-K accession that holds the gold table, so the failure is one of retrieval coverage rather than a wrong answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003879735, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002517935, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013618, "wall_seconds": 75.56918913500158, "api_seconds": 73.52453126099681, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 50497, "completion_tokens": 1734, "reasoning_tokens": 594, "cache_read_tokens": 26426, "excerpt_characters": 3400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000010", "0000094845-25-000029", "0000315066-25-000776", "0000935836-25-000099", "0000935836-25-000108", "0000935836-25-000109", "0000935836-25-000110", "0000935836-25-000174", "0000950170-25-019991", "0000950170-25-021720", "0001308179-25-000101", "0001308179-25-000102", "0001493152-25-004902", "0001493152-25-004904", "0001641172-25-008652", "0001641172-25-014339", "0001641172-25-014341", "0001839882-25-006891", "0001839882-25-006898", "0001839882-25-006900", "0001839882-25-006906", "0001839882-25-006909", "0001839882-25-006914", "0001839882-25-006919", "0001959173-25-003354", "0001999371-25-005354", "0001999371-25-005895", "0001999371-25-005897", "0001999371-25-005898", "0001999371-25-005899", "0001999371-25-005901", "0001999371-25-005903", "0001999371-25-005904", "0001999371-25-005905", "0001999371-25-005906", "0001999371-25-005908", "0001999371-25-005909", "0001999371-25-006407", "0001999371-25-006532", "0001999371-25-007160" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3e646f58b80d337a3599c82d.json", "detail_js": "details/3e646f58b80d337a3599c82d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3e646f58b80d337a3599c82d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/827168641f81440595cb1ad374bbaefb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b0e202b771544e689ebe4a0da09dd85a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2c1b9511f8eafb873c20a28a", "question_id": "Q054", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, and what was the percentage point expansion compared to 2023?", "reference": "Levi Strauss & Co.'s gross profit margin was 60.0% (60.04%) in fiscal year 2024 ($3,815.9 million on net revenues of $6,355.3 million), expanding by 3.1 percentage points from 56.9% in 2023.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Levi Strauss & Co.’s fiscal 2024 gross profit margin was **60.04%**, calculated as gross profit of **$3,815.9 million ÷ net revenues of $6,355.3 million**. Fiscal 2023 was **56.90%** (**$3,515.7 million ÷ $6,179.0 million**). Thus, the margin expanded by **3.15 percentage points** (using unrounded margins).\n\n**Source:** Form 10-K, filing `0000094845-25-000006`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, characters 33,548–45,548. The cited income statement reports the fiscal-year revenue and gross-profit figures for 2024 and 2023.", "correctness": 88, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic checks out. 3,815.9 / 6,355.3 = 60.04%, and 3,515.7 / 6,179.0 = 56.90%, both matching the reference's figures. Its 3.15 pp expansion is correct on unrounded margins (60.043% - 56.898%). The reference's 3.1 pp comes from the rounded 60.0% and 56.9%, so the gap is a rounding convention, not an error. The candidate's inputs match the income statement in the tool output (read_filing, chars 33548-45548, accession 0000094845-25-000006), so its citation is supported by the tool evidence. It does not cite the gold accession (-000005), but the tool output shows the same statement in the cited file. Small deductions for the rounding divergence from the reference and the accession mismatch with the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00300989, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00139989, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.00161, "wall_seconds": 56.937026187999436, "api_seconds": 56.499110555003426, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26905, "completion_tokens": 1750, "reasoning_tokens": 1056, "cache_read_tokens": 8249, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000094845-25-000005", "0000094845-25-000006", "0000935836-25-000087", "0000950170-25-005868", "0001839882-25-001335", "0001839882-25-003260", "0001839882-25-003261", "0001839882-25-003302", "0001839882-25-003303", "0001839882-25-003304", "0001839882-25-003305", "0001839882-25-006906", "0001959173-25-000126", "0001999371-25-000183", "0001999371-25-000800", "0001999371-25-000802", "0001999371-25-000804", "0001999371-25-000806", "0001999371-25-000808", "0001999371-25-000810" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2c1b9511f8eafb873c20a28a.json", "detail_js": "details/2c1b9511f8eafb873c20a28a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2c1b9511f8eafb873c20a28a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7186b598ba6842ed902d3262eaa5032b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/641ebdbd189140e786a24750bd9e7e30.request.json" }, { "task_id": "bc8b444159ed61bade4515bc", "question_id": "Q055", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Comcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation's operating income margin was 18.83% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income ($23,297 million) divided by Revenue ($123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected, the tool budget was exhausted before the Consolidated Statements of Income in Comcast Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file_stem: `0001166691-25-000011`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`) could be retrieved. \n\nTherefore, there is insufficient evidence in the returned data to provide Comcast Corporation's Operating Income, Revenue, and Operating Income Margin percentage for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 30, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a computable answer: operating income of $23,297M divided by revenue of $123,731M, a margin of about 18.83%. The candidate abstains and provides none of these figures, so it is not correct on an answerable question. Its claim of an exhausted tool budget is not supported by any tool output, which shows no budget error. The tool evidence does support the filing identification (accession 0001166691-25-000011, file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet, FY ending 2024-12-31) and shows the 'Operating income' text was located, but no income-statement values were retrieved. Citation support is therefore partial.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03936075, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03798675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001374, "wall_seconds": 39.623821687999225, "api_seconds": 36.70353247399726, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55984, "completion_tokens": 1681, "reasoning_tokens": 393, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/bc8b444159ed61bade4515bc.json", "detail_js": "details/bc8b444159ed61bade4515bc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/bc8b444159ed61bade4515bc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/28b0fe252b0f477093a258eb1568e00e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9a161303a74c4d5f90683b6fd9cb1a12.request.json" }, { "task_id": "51556f71363d274d044f8e66", "question_id": "Q055", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Comcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation's operating income margin was 18.83% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income ($23,297 million) divided by Revenue ($123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Comcast Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income in its 2024 Form 10-K (filed January 31, 2025; file stem `0001166691-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, page 61):\n\n### **Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Data:**\n- **Operating Income:** $23,297 million\n- **Revenue:** $123,731 million\n\n---\n\n### **Operating Income Margin Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Operating Income Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Operating Income}}{\\text{Revenue}} = \\frac{\\$23,297\\text{ million}}{\\$123,731\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.1882875\\text{ or } 18.83\\%$$\n\nComcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 was approximately **18.83%** (or **18.8%**).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic checks out: 23,297 / 123,731 = 0.1882874, which rounds to 18.83% (18.8% at one decimal), matching the reference. Operating income ($23,297M) and revenue ($123,731M) both appear in the Consolidated Statements of Income in the tool output, and the gold quote for operating income matches. The accession, file ID, page 61 and the January 31, 2025 filing date are all supported by the tool results. Minor deduction only because the candidate's 0.1882875 is a rounding of the exact value and the filing date and file ID come from tool output rather than the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05503975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05223375, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.002806, "wall_seconds": 34.39912842600097, "api_seconds": 31.926753505003944, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 90065, "completion_tokens": 1528, "reasoning_tokens": 354, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000021", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/51556f71363d274d044f8e66.json", "detail_js": "details/51556f71363d274d044f8e66.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/51556f71363d274d044f8e66.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6e8f895096a442bbb67cced5b20c4ff7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/aade0023bb0145fe84c5a6c2cf6f5f43.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4a2c83596601ee3a57aee384", "question_id": "Q055", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Comcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation's operating income margin was 18.83% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income ($23,297 million) divided by Revenue ($123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Comcast’s fiscal 2024 operating income margin was **18.83%**.\n\nCalculation: **$23,297 million ÷ $123,731 million × 100 = 18.8287%**.\n\nSource: Comcast 2024 filing, `file_stem` **0001166691-25-000006**, `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`. The income-statement excerpt at character offset **40,200** shows revenue of $123,731 million and operating income of $23,297 million for 2024.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's margin (18.83%), operating income ($23,297M), and revenue ($123,731M) match the reference, and the arithmetic checks out (23,297 / 123,731 = 18.8287%). The tool outputs support the figures: the duckdb excerpt scoped to file_stem 0001166691-25-000006 shows Revenue 123731 and Operating income 23297 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The candidate cites that accession, while the gold evidence cites 0001166691-25-000011. The tool evidence does not show that the 000011 filing was checked, so the candidate's source is supported by its own tool output but differs from the gold accession. The reference does not name an accession, so this costs only a little correctness. The offset 40,200 is approximate, since the excerpt was taken with a substring starting at that position and the table does appear there.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002452685, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001280085, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011726, "wall_seconds": 28.262711348001176, "api_seconds": 27.161811960000705, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 28080, "completion_tokens": 1499, "reasoning_tokens": 713, "cache_read_tokens": 14011, "excerpt_characters": 2900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549", "0001225208-25-002845", "0001225208-25-002849", "0001225208-25-003477" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4a2c83596601ee3a57aee384.json", "detail_js": "details/4a2c83596601ee3a57aee384.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4a2c83596601ee3a57aee384.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/09235cd4c96d4e049a94d019772d0c84.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e8e6c7e570341dd8c727110459a41d8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "594c64c7e833485fef4a2bed", "question_id": "Q055", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Comcast Corporation's operating income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Revenue?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation's operating income margin was 18.83% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Operating income ($23,297 million) divided by Revenue ($123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned filing evidence identifies Comcast Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K, but it does not include the figures for 2024 revenue and operating income. I therefore can’t calculate the operating income margin from the available evidence.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: operating income of $23,297M and revenue of $123,731M give about 18.83%, and the gold evidence quotes the 23297 operating income line from the 2024 Form 10-K. The candidate abstains, so it provides no margin and misses the required answer. The abstention is not justified, because the agent identified the correct filing and the table of contents pointed to the income statement, but the agent stopped after reading the Item 8 index and a Report of Management excerpt. It never read the income statement itself, even though read_filing returned a next_start offset. The candidate's narrow statement that the retrieved excerpts lack the figures is accurate, but its broader claim that the filing evidence does not contain them is not established, since the statement was never reached. Citation support is therefore partial.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00513675, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00299505, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021417, "wall_seconds": 34.404665530000784, "api_seconds": 33.119665091997376, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 61703, "completion_tokens": 1377, "reasoning_tokens": 542, "cache_read_tokens": 24350, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549", "0001225208-25-002845", "0001225208-25-002849", "0001225208-25-003477" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/594c64c7e833485fef4a2bed.json", "detail_js": "details/594c64c7e833485fef4a2bed.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/594c64c7e833485fef4a2bed.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/835f684eef784f91b6b00de1846139e2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/01434aa5980d483b8c75a2df96ab51c7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "10ff93070aa49451ca73a8c3", "question_id": "Q056", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was ConocoPhillips's net income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Net income divided by Total Revenues and Other Income?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips's net income margin was 16.23% in 2024, calculated as Net income ($9,245 million) divided by Total Revenues and Other Income ($56,953 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips's Consolidated Income Statement in its 2024 Form 10-K (filed on February 18, 2025; file stem `0001163165-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, page 77), the figures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, are:\n\n* **Net Income (Loss):** **$9,245 million**\n* **Total Revenues and Other Income:** **$56,953 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation**\n\n$$\\text{Net Income Margin Percentage} = \\frac{\\text{Net Income}}{\\text{Total Revenues and Other Income}} \\times 100$$\n\n$$\\text{Net Income Margin Percentage} = \\frac{\\$9,245\\text{ million}}{\\$56,953\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx \\mathbf{16.23\\%} \\quad (16.2327\\%)$$", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence exactly: Net income of $9,245M and Total Revenues and Other Income of $56,953M for FY2024. The calculation 9245/56953 = 16.2327%, rounded to 16.23%, is confirmed by the duckdb_query output. The filing metadata (accession 0001163165-25-000012, 10-K, filed 2025-02-18, file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet) is supported by the header query. Page 77 is supported by the '77 ConocoPhillips 2024 10-K' marker following the income statement in the retrieved text. Minor deduction only because the answer's extra detail (page number, file ID) goes slightly beyond the gold reference, though all of it is traceable to tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0416201, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0404175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012026, "wall_seconds": 40.953854723000404, "api_seconds": 39.13572063799984, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 50661, "completion_tokens": 3051, "reasoning_tokens": 1731, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/10ff93070aa49451ca73a8c3.json", "detail_js": "details/10ff93070aa49451ca73a8c3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/10ff93070aa49451ca73a8c3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/29a0a09b7df14b3a97de737230913091.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e0cba140a1ab4904ac20e4e964aabe20.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dca22301927083e30fe5ce1c", "question_id": "Q056", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was ConocoPhillips's net income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Net income divided by Total Revenues and Other Income?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips's net income margin was 16.23% in 2024, calculated as Net income ($9,245 million) divided by Total Revenues and Other Income ($56,953 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to ConocoPhillips’s Consolidated Income Statement in its 2024 Form 10-K (file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, file stem: `0001163165-25-000012`, page 77):\n\n### **Reported Financial Data for Fiscal Year 2024**\n* **Net Income (Loss):** $9,245 million\n* **Total Revenues and Other Income:** $56,953 million\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation**\n$$\\text{Net Income Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Net Income}}{\\text{Total Revenues and Other Income}} = \\frac{9{,}245}{56{,}953} \\approx 0.1623267...$$\n\n* **Net income margin percentage:** **16.23%** (or **16.2327%**)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence. Net income of $9,245M and Total Revenues and Other Income of $56,953M both appear in the Consolidated Income Statement retrieved via read_filing. The arithmetic is correct: 9,245 / 56,953 ≈ 0.162327, so the margin is 16.23%. The stated page (77) matches the page marker shown after the income statement, and the accession and file ID are consistent with the tool output. The early duckdb error and failed needle search do not affect the answer, which rests on the successfully retrieved statement.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0418857, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0397995, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0020862, "wall_seconds": 28.05549771799997, "api_seconds": 26.635625242997776, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 68583, "completion_tokens": 1069, "reasoning_tokens": 238, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/dca22301927083e30fe5ce1c.json", "detail_js": "details/dca22301927083e30fe5ce1c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dca22301927083e30fe5ce1c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b81601dda6cf4a4c8355d172dc0870ee.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/65964a2b2a814313a79fd3bcd3332286.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9b8832ec4b363ccc631bb446", "question_id": "Q056", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was ConocoPhillips's net income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Net income divided by Total Revenues and Other Income?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips's net income margin was 16.23% in 2024, calculated as Net income ($9,245 million) divided by Total Revenues and Other Income ($56,953 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "ConocoPhillips’s fiscal 2024 net income margin was **16.23%**.\n\nUsing the filing’s figures (in millions): **Net income $9,245 ÷ Total Revenues and Other Income $56,953 × 100 = 16.2327%**. The evidence is from filing `0001163165-25-000012`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, in the income statement excerpt returned by the scoped query.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 16.23% matches the reference. Net income of $9,245M and Total Revenues and Other Income of $56,953M for 2024 both appear in the duckdb excerpt from accession 0001163165-25-000012, and the arithmetic (9245/56953 = 16.2327%) is confirmed by the tool output. Units (millions) are stated correctly. The citation is slightly indirect: the answer cites the accession and file, and the excerpt contains the figures, but it does not quote the exact line the gold evidence uses. That is a minor gap, not an error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002037735, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001149635, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008881, "wall_seconds": 27.316420242001186, "api_seconds": 26.425357054995402, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26777, "completion_tokens": 1052, "reasoning_tokens": 317, "cache_read_tokens": 14371, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019431", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000310" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/9b8832ec4b363ccc631bb446.json", "detail_js": "details/9b8832ec4b363ccc631bb446.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9b8832ec4b363ccc631bb446.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/45d1620d74964956aa2622ef1b40caeb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d0e68fc0300247068fa677ab4ad768fb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6bde0deffb93ba2a9915172d", "question_id": "Q056", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was ConocoPhillips's net income margin percentage in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Net income divided by Total Revenues and Other Income?", "reference": "ConocoPhillips's net income margin was 16.23% in 2024, calculated as Net income ($9,245 million) divided by Total Revenues and Other Income ($56,953 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned filing evidence confirms that this is ConocoPhillips’s 2024 Form 10-K, but it does not show the figures for Net income or Total Revenues and Other Income. I can’t calculate the margin from the evidence available.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a 16.23% net income margin (9,245 / 56,953). The candidate gives no figure and abstains, saying the evidence does not show Net income or Total Revenues and Other Income. The question is answerable, so abstention earns little correctness credit. The candidate's account of its evidence is accurate: the tool outputs confirm the 10-K accession and fiscal year end, but the read was limited to the first 6,000 characters of the filing and never reached the income statement. Its claim that the figures were not shown is therefore well supported, though the tool results do not support the reference's $56,953 million revenue figure either way. The candidate's honesty about the gap is good, but the answer is not delivered.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003613725, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002310725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001303, "wall_seconds": 34.486771750000116, "api_seconds": 32.38506371999938, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48078, "completion_tokens": 1330, "reasoning_tokens": 509, "cache_read_tokens": 24210, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-012974", "0000950170-25-017601", "0000950170-25-017692", "0000950170-25-017717", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-017772", "0000950170-25-017806", "0000950170-25-017810", "0000950170-25-017814", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019409", "0000950170-25-019411", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019424", "0000950170-25-019431", "0000950170-25-019448", "0000950170-25-019453", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6bde0deffb93ba2a9915172d.json", "detail_js": "details/6bde0deffb93ba2a9915172d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6bde0deffb93ba2a9915172d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6928ac3a85ca42e6a3495b5684205600.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3a96b4e3fdcc4dc58d48de6ad38e0a8b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e6fb641f0329ade761b21008", "question_id": "Q057", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 (Total current assets minus Total current liabilities).", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was $3,620 million ($3.62 billion), calculated as Total current assets ($24,447 million) minus Total current liabilities ($20,827 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings located within the available database:\n\n1. **Filing Identified**: Marathon Petroleum Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 was identified under:\n - **Company**: Marathon Petroleum Corp (CIK: `0001510295`)\n - **Accession / File Stem**: `0001510295-25-000012`\n - **File ID**: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`\n - **Filing Date**: February 27, 2025\n\n2. **Limitation**:\n Due to the tool call budget being exhausted before navigating to the actual Consolidated Balance Sheet table (Item 8, page 81 of the Form 10-K), the exact values for **Total current assets** and **Total current liabilities** as of December 31, 2024 could not be extracted. \n\nTherefore, the available evidence is **insufficient** to calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 65, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Total current assets of 24,447 and the reference computes working capital of $3,620 million. The candidate abstained and gave no working capital figure, so it fails the core task even though the question is answerable. Its filing identification (CIK 0001510295, accession 0001510295-25-000012, 10-K for FYE 12/31/2024, filed 2025-02-27) is supported by the header output, and the Item 8 balance sheet at page 81 is supported by the table of contents. However, the claim that the 'tool call budget was exhausted' appears nowhere in the tool outputs, and the candidate did not retrieve the balance sheet values that were within reach (the tool located the balance sheet offset at position 356,288 but the candidate never read the table rows). The abstention is therefore not justified by the reference's answerability.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03725565, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03581475, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014409, "wall_seconds": 35.22488755000086, "api_seconds": 31.920413028999974, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 54162, "completion_tokens": 1600, "reasoning_tokens": 379, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025", "0001510295-25-000039" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/e6fb641f0329ade761b21008.json", "detail_js": "details/e6fb641f0329ade761b21008.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e6fb641f0329ade761b21008.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bfea253066054d7689dd1159bf3aaf3c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ae83a89c4a54f59af763f9c278976f5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5044936888ee0b931f50af12", "question_id": "Q057", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 (Total current assets minus Total current liabilities).", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was $3,620 million ($3.62 billion), calculated as Total current assets ($24,447 million) minus Total current liabilities ($20,827 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Marathon Petroleum Corporation’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File stem: `0001510295-25-000012`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Values as of December 31, 2024:**\n* **Total Current Assets:** $24,447 million\n * Cash and cash equivalents: $3,210 million\n * Receivables, less allowance: $11,145 million\n * Inventories: $9,568 million\n * Other current assets: $524 million\n* **Total Current Liabilities:** $20,827 million\n * Accounts payable: $13,906 million\n * Payroll and benefits payable: $1,096 million\n * Accrued taxes: $1,204 million\n * Debt due within one year: $3,049 million\n * Operating lease liabilities: $417 million\n * Other current liabilities: $1,155 million\n\n---\n\n### **Working Capital Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Working Capital} = \\text{Total Current Assets} - \\text{Total Current Liabilities}$$\n$$\\text{Working Capital} = \\$24,447\\text{ million} - \\$20,827\\text{ million} = \\$3,620\\text{ million}$$\n\nMarathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was **$3,620 million** (or **$3.62 billion**).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's working capital of $3,620M (24,447 minus 20,827) matches the reference and the balance sheet in the tool output. Its line items also sum correctly: current assets 3,210 + 11,145 + 9,568 + 524 = 24,447, and current liabilities 13,906 + 1,096 + 1,204 + 3,049 + 417 + 1,155 = 20,827. The balance sheet text returned by read_filing supports every figure, along with the accession and file ID. The only omission is the blank 2024 short-term investments line, which does not affect the result.", "known_cost_usd": 0.06446185, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.06176925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026926, "wall_seconds": 35.451090881999335, "api_seconds": 33.06442232599875, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 101500, "completion_tokens": 1557, "reasoning_tokens": 304, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025", "0001510295-25-000039" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5044936888ee0b931f50af12.json", "detail_js": "details/5044936888ee0b931f50af12.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5044936888ee0b931f50af12.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dc80cf1ef36c4bb1b4341d4d2364e738.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f3a96351744c4b6fa30140eb3cd1895c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "86a0523158965f0578a51d26", "question_id": "Q057", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 (Total current assets minus Total current liabilities).", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was $3,620 million ($3.62 billion), calculated as Total current assets ($24,447 million) minus Total current liabilities ($20,827 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum reported **total current assets of $24,447 million** and **total current liabilities of $20,827 million** as of December 31, 2024. Working capital was:\n\n**$24,447 million − $20,827 million = $3,620 million** (or **$3.62 billion**).\n\nSource: Marathon Petroleum Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K, file stem `0001510295-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; consolidated balance sheet excerpt at character offset 379,500.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: total current assets $24,447M, total current liabilities $20,827M, and working capital $3,620M ($3.62B). The arithmetic is correct and the date (December 31, 2024) is right. The tool output supports every value. The balance sheet excerpt pulled at offset 379,500 shows Total current assets 24447 and Total current liabilities 20827 in the 2024 column. The accession and file ID match the query results. The candidate does not cite the Item 8 section label, a minor omission that does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002342035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001233435, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011086, "wall_seconds": 26.426386217999607, "api_seconds": 23.70365391500127, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30415, "completion_tokens": 939, "reasoning_tokens": 249, "cache_read_tokens": 14711, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001665", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001669", "0000950170-25-001671", "0000950170-25-001673", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001678", "0000950170-25-001681", "0000950170-25-001684", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000002", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/86a0523158965f0578a51d26.json", "detail_js": "details/86a0523158965f0578a51d26.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/86a0523158965f0578a51d26.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3311d76a359747f2b1e91c6fd9522e52.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/068b175bf17745568db545e3a31b3daf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "53fd88b5632c79fd28acf3d0", "question_id": "Q057", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 (Total current assets minus Total current liabilities).", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation's working capital as of December 31, 2024 was $3,620 million ($3.62 billion), calculated as Total current assets ($24,447 million) minus Total current liabilities ($20,827 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum reported **total current assets of $24,447 million** and **total current liabilities of $20,827 million** as of December 31, 2024. \n**Working capital = $24,447 million − $20,827 million = $3,620 million** (**$3.62 billion**).\n\nSource: 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0001510295-25-000012`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, balance-sheet passage at character offsets 378,818–390,818.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: total current assets $24,447M, total current liabilities $20,827M, and working capital $3,620M ($3.62B). The arithmetic checks out (24,447 − 20,827 = 3,620). The tool output from read_filing directly shows both balance-sheet line items for accession 0001510295-25-000012 as of December 31, 2024, and the cited character offsets 378,818–390,818 match the returned char_start and char_end. The file name sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet also matches the tool output. The candidate's citation is slightly broader than the gold evidence, which quotes only the current-assets line, but the liabilities figure is still supported by the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0035236, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0018597, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016639, "wall_seconds": 26.54155486700074, "api_seconds": 24.998269394996896, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 46402, "completion_tokens": 1030, "reasoning_tokens": 289, "cache_read_tokens": 20965, "excerpt_characters": 15000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001665", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001669", "0000950170-25-001671", "0000950170-25-001673", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001678", "0000950170-25-001681", "0000950170-25-001684", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000002", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/53fd88b5632c79fd28acf3d0.json", "detail_js": "details/53fd88b5632c79fd28acf3d0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/53fd88b5632c79fd28acf3d0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f505ebd4c53b42ed83fabca72067d23b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d275119bc6c34bc98e33185134b46a33.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c7ffb40651243c1d326c433d", "question_id": "Q058", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Whirlpool Corporation's percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table?", "reference": "Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales decreased by 14.6% in 2024 (declining from $19,455 million in 2023 to $16,607 million in 2024).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the **Results of Operations** table in Whirlpool Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0000106640-25-000011`):\n\n* **2024 Net sales:** $16,607 million\n* **2023 Net sales:** $19,455 million\n* **Percentage change (Better/(Worse) %):** **(14.6)%** (a decrease of 14.6%)\n\n*(Calculation check: $\\frac{16,607 - 19,455}{19,455} = \\frac{-2,848}{19,455} \\approx -14.639\\%$, disclosed as **(14.6)%**)*", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 2024 net sales ($16,607M), 2023 net sales ($19,455M), and the disclosed (14.6)% change all match the reference and the Results of Operations table in the tool output. The arithmetic check (-2,848/19,455 ≈ -14.64%) is correct, and the candidate correctly labels the column as Better/(Worse) %. The file stem matches the gold accession. Minor deduction only for the candidate's added framing of the fiscal year, which the table supports but does not state verbatim.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0343555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0331725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001183, "wall_seconds": 31.32864934099962, "api_seconds": 29.646671266998965, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 49765, "completion_tokens": 1259, "reasoning_tokens": 242, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c7ffb40651243c1d326c433d.json", "detail_js": "details/c7ffb40651243c1d326c433d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c7ffb40651243c1d326c433d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/341c8468d1b64dc7b3854bb745c8d098.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/35801ba8b8fa42fb8c9d8eace3e2ec86.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dc581d539798c0a346639ff1", "question_id": "Q058", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Whirlpool Corporation's percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table?", "reference": "Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales decreased by 14.6% in 2024 (declining from $19,455 million in 2023 to $16,607 million in 2024).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved evidence within Whirlpool Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / `file_stem`: `0000106640-25-000011` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the search located the relevant filing and identified the location of the *Results of Operations* section within Management's Discussion and Analysis; however, the tool budget was exhausted before reading and extracting the exact percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 from the Results of Operations table. \n\nTherefore, the returned evidence is insufficient to state the exact percentage change.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a definite answer: Net sales fell 14.6% from $19,455M (2023) to $16,607M (2024). The question is answerable, so abstaining earns no credit. The candidate states no percentage and no figures. Its citation support is partial. The accession number and the location of the 'Results of Operations' text are backed by the tool outputs. However, the claim that the tool budget was exhausted does not appear in the tool evidence, which shows no budget-exhaustion signal. The candidate also did not read the table that the retrieved text pointed to, even though the gold quote was in the same filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0391035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.037569, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015345, "wall_seconds": 32.1550256369992, "api_seconds": 30.477877563998845, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58107, "completion_tokens": 1466, "reasoning_tokens": 392, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/dc581d539798c0a346639ff1.json", "detail_js": "details/dc581d539798c0a346639ff1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dc581d539798c0a346639ff1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4a9da519046c4a5abab949d53d968f3b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b436ac2e2e7044a0abb32321fce9c64d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f4ef4b049d9f7460be367303", "question_id": "Q058", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Whirlpool Corporation's percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table?", "reference": "Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales decreased by 14.6% in 2024 (declining from $19,455 million in 2023 to $16,607 million in 2024).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned excerpts confirm this is Whirlpool Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K, but they do not include the Results of Operations table or its Net sales percentage-change figure. I can’t determine the requested percentage from the available evidence.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a definite answer: Net sales fell 14.6%, from $19,455M in 2023 to $16,607M in 2024, per the Results of Operations table. The candidate abstains, so it provides none of the requested figures. Abstention earns full credit only if the question is unanswerable, and the gold evidence shows it is answerable from the filing, so correctness is low. Citation support is high because the candidate's claims match the tool outputs. The tool results confirm the Whirlpool 10-K identity (accession 0000106640-25-000011) and show the read stopped around character 126,000, at the start of Item 7 and before the Results of Operations table. The candidate correctly reports that the retrieved text lacks the table and the percentage. The gap is retrieval, not a wrong claim, which is why the abstention is honest even though it is unhelpful.", "known_cost_usd": 0.006052915, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003875715, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021772, "wall_seconds": 42.18266315599976, "api_seconds": 39.57268067000223, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 79878, "completion_tokens": 1579, "reasoning_tokens": 517, "cache_read_tokens": 36844, "excerpt_characters": 33000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f4ef4b049d9f7460be367303.json", "detail_js": "details/f4ef4b049d9f7460be367303.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f4ef4b049d9f7460be367303.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4fe4f2ff6ee04596b1980ead8acfc69c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/95f0e92c18074c5f824fe5be4cf11a32.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c66b8556cc9ad15e423cbf56", "question_id": "Q058", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Whirlpool Corporation's percentage change in Net sales in 2024 compared to 2023 as disclosed in its Results of Operations table?", "reference": "Whirlpool Corporation's Net sales decreased by 14.6% in 2024 (declining from $19,455 million in 2023 to $16,607 million in 2024).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence identifies Whirlpool Corporation’s 2024 filing, but it does not include the Results of Operations table or its Net sales percentage change. I can’t determine the disclosed percentage from the available evidence.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence contains the Net sales row showing $16,607M (2024), $19,455M (2023), and (14.6)%. The candidate abstained, so it gives no percentage and misses the core answer. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not, so correctness is low. The candidate's stated limitation is accurate for the retrieved tool outputs: the Results of Operations read returned the table of contents and business sections, and the 'Percentage Change' search found nothing, so the table was never retrieved. The candidate's claim that the evidence identifies the 2024 filing is supported by the accession lookup and the filing text, which describes the 2024 annual report. The candidate's failure was to retrieve the table, not to misstate the retrieved content.", "known_cost_usd": 0.006485375, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003951675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025337, "wall_seconds": 33.63857337599984, "api_seconds": 32.53014214299583, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 82403, "completion_tokens": 1407, "reasoning_tokens": 563, "cache_read_tokens": 34435, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c66b8556cc9ad15e423cbf56.json", "detail_js": "details/c66b8556cc9ad15e423cbf56.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c66b8556cc9ad15e423cbf56.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc7483f0ee484ec9b7585e44c3f81672.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c4a933f8d64d42cba1c5b0f480c988ec.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02", "question_id": "Q059", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.'s 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and its 11,085 permanent, full-time employees, what was the average revenue generated per employee in 2024?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc.'s average revenue per employee in 2024 was $205,241.32 ($205.24 thousand per employee), calculated as $2,275,100,000 divided by 11,085 employees.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "To calculate the average revenue generated per employee in 2024 for Morningstar, Inc. based on the provided figures:\n\n### **Given:**\n* **2024 Revenue:** $2,275.1 million ($2,275,100,000)\n* **Permanent, Full-Time Employees:** 11,085\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Average Revenue per Employee} = \\frac{\\text{Total Revenue}}{\\text{Number of Employees}}$$\n\n$$\\text{Average Revenue per Employee} = \\frac{\\$2,275,100,000}{11,085} \\approx \\$205,241.32$$\n\n---\n\n### **Answer:**\nThe average revenue generated per employee in 2024 was approximately **$205,241.32** (or approximately **$0.2052 million** per employee).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $2,275,100,000 / 11,085 ≈ $205,241.32, which matches the reference. The $0.2052 million figure is a correct rounding of 0.20524 million. The DuckDB output independently confirms the quotient 205,241.317. The tool evidence does not verify the input figures ($2,275.1M revenue and 11,085 employees); those were taken from the question. The gold evidence shows the revenue figure, but the employee count is not cited, so citation support is good but not complete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00302555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0026272500000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0003983, "wall_seconds": 9.826401139000154, "api_seconds": 9.712709332996383, "api_attempts": 3, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 2, "tool_requested": 1, "tool_processed": 1, "tool_dispatched": 1, "tool_cache_hits": 0, "tool_worker_runs": 1, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 3276, "completion_tokens": 842, "reasoning_tokens": 351, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02.json", "detail_js": "details/1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1d6afc06d6f4782ce86a7e02.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/86defb6d848e42f8bef211985eae5ea2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/53b31caf7b854ee1add30d1850c52dcf.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f67cef7319817ef6179e509f", "question_id": "Q059", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.'s 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and its 11,085 permanent, full-time employees, what was the average revenue generated per employee in 2024?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc.'s average revenue per employee in 2024 was $205,241.32 ($205.24 thousand per employee), calculated as $2,275,100,000 divided by 11,085 employees.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "To determine the average revenue generated per employee for Morningstar, Inc. in 2024 based on the stated figures:\n\n### **1. Stated Data**\n* **2024 Revenue:** $\\$2,275.1\\text{ million} = \\$2,275,100,000$\n* **Permanent, Full-Time Employees:** $11,085$\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation**\n$$\\text{Average Revenue Per Employee} = \\frac{\\text{Total Revenue}}{\\text{Number of Employees}}$$\n\n$$\\text{Average Revenue Per Employee} = \\frac{\\$2,275,100,000}{11,085} \\approx \\$205,241.32$$\n\n---\n\n### **3. Conclusion**\nThe average revenue generated per employee in 2024 was approximately **$205,241.32** (or approximately **$0.2052 million** per employee).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 35, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's final figure of $205,241.32 per employee matches the reference, and the unit handling is correct: $2,275.1 million is $2,275,100,000, and the stated $0.2052 million is a correct rounding. The DuckDB call in the tool evidence independently confirms the division (205241.317...). However, the tool evidence does not verify the inputs. The search returned no rows, the text-search query ran out of memory, and the read_filing call errored, so neither the $2,275.1 million revenue nor the 11,085 employee count was confirmed from a filing. The gold evidence (the key metrics table) is not cited in the candidate's response or in the tool outputs. Citation support is therefore limited to the arithmetic, not the sourced inputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02370125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02284275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008585, "wall_seconds": 26.38068399199983, "api_seconds": 25.786969332999433, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32037, "completion_tokens": 1401, "reasoning_tokens": 435, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012209", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000027" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/f67cef7319817ef6179e509f.json", "detail_js": "details/f67cef7319817ef6179e509f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f67cef7319817ef6179e509f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4bb4b31af23e48f58f8fb06e3a69fa0f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/31ab86dbbeb046f699cbaa4e43662e1a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2", "question_id": "Q059", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.'s 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and its 11,085 permanent, full-time employees, what was the average revenue generated per employee in 2024?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc.'s average revenue per employee in 2024 was $205,241.32 ($205.24 thousand per employee), calculated as $2,275,100,000 divided by 11,085 employees.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Average revenue per employee was **about $205,241** in 2024.\n\nCalculation: $2,275.1 million ÷ 11,085 employees = about $0.20524 million per employee.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct. $2,275.1M / 11,085 = $205,241.32, which matches the reference, and the candidate's rounded '$205,241' and '$0.20524 million' are both accurate. It omits the 'per thousand' framing, which is a minor completeness gap. Citation support is partial. The duckdb_query output independently confirms the division (205241.317 dollars and 0.205241 million per employee). However, the tool evidence never retrieves the filing text, so the $2,275.1M revenue and 11,085 employee figures are taken from the user's question rather than verified against a source.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001072805, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000489905, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0005829, "wall_seconds": 11.674640322000414, "api_seconds": 11.550745347001794, "api_attempts": 4, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 3, "tool_requested": 2, "tool_processed": 2, "tool_dispatched": 2, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 1, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 8376, "completion_tokens": 732, "reasoning_tokens": 377, "cache_read_tokens": 2148, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2.json", "detail_js": "details/cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/cd8e4c9882b720412ff64aa2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f2bf6abd50084905a78a168745c26505.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ae1f952355964b9ea5e70fd13b94d7e5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "19618a96029f446f1ca8906c", "question_id": "Q059", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Based on Morningstar, Inc.'s 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and its 11,085 permanent, full-time employees, what was the average revenue generated per employee in 2024?", "reference": "Morningstar, Inc.'s average revenue per employee in 2024 was $205,241.32 ($205.24 thousand per employee), calculated as $2,275,100,000 divided by 11,085 employees.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Average 2024 revenue per employee was approximately **$205,241**.\n\nCalculation: **$2,275.1 million ÷ 11,085 employees = about $0.20524 million per employee** (about **$205,241**).\n\nThe filing reports 2024 revenue of $2,275.1 million and identifies Morningstar, Inc. by name (file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, filing `0001289419-25-000041`, character offset 307,534). It reports 11,085 permanent, full-time employees as of December 31, 2024 (same file and filing, character offset 66,827).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $2,275.1M / 11,085 = $205,241.3 per employee, matching the reference's $205,241.32 and its $205.24K figure. Units and the 2024 year are right. It rounds to whole dollars, which is a minor loss of precision. The cited offsets (307,534 for the $2,275.1M revenue and 66,827 for the 11,085 employees) match the read_filing outputs, and the employee count appears in the tool text as of December 31, 2024. The candidate does not cite the Key Metrics table quoted in gold_evidence, which does not appear in the tool output shown, so citation support is strong but not perfect.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003953155, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002039655, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019135, "wall_seconds": 28.87246426799902, "api_seconds": 27.943462356002783, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45180, "completion_tokens": 1506, "reasoning_tokens": 697, "cache_read_tokens": 17653, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-012209", "0001104659-25-027796", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000003", "0001289419-25-000005", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000009", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000015", "0001289419-25-000017", "0001289419-25-000019", "0001289419-25-000022", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000027", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000043", "0001289419-25-000053", "0001289419-25-000058", "0001921094-25-000092" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/19618a96029f446f1ca8906c.json", "detail_js": "details/19618a96029f446f1ca8906c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/19618a96029f446f1ca8906c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7fc179c73ed9413f8845680e127bd531.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f798d2b4d1d941d3a36c215606bcb368.request.json" }, { "task_id": "93bbc0eaf3fa354053a93acf", "question_id": "Q060", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Exelon Corporation's operating margin percentage in 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total operating revenues?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation's operating margin was 18.76% in 2024, calculated as Operating income ($4,319 million) divided by Total operating revenues ($23,028 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Due to tool budget and resource limits (queries on the large parsed filings encountering out-of-memory errors within the allocated budget), the exact values for Exelon Corporation's 2024 Operating Income and Total Operating Revenues could not be extracted from the filing text. \n\nTherefore, the available evidence is insufficient to calculate Exelon Corporation's 2024 operating margin percentage.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence confirms Operating income of 4,319 for 2024, and the revenue figure is in the filing. The candidate abstained, citing out-of-memory errors. Since the reference is answerable, abstention earns no correctness credit, and the candidate gives no margin or inputs. Its abstention claim is supported by the tool outputs, which show repeated OutOfMemoryException errors on the relevant filing. Those outputs do not contain the operating income row, so the candidate's account of failed extraction is accurate but incomplete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0486317, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.047316, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013157, "wall_seconds": 30.352663671999835, "api_seconds": 29.25257226299982, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 69580, "completion_tokens": 1333, "reasoning_tokens": 361, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000902219-25-000057", "0000929638-25-000675", "0000929638-25-000680", "0000929638-25-000720", "0000929638-25-001134", "0000929638-25-001177", "0000929638-25-001243", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001104659-25-032152", "0001104659-25-033389", "0001104659-25-044095", "0001109357-25-000018", "0001109357-25-000024", "0001109357-25-000028", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000057", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078", "0001109357-25-000080", "0001109357-25-000082", "0001109357-25-000084", "0001109357-25-000086", "0001109357-25-000092", "0001109357-25-000094", "0001109357-25-000096", "0001109357-25-000103", "0001109357-25-000105", "0001109357-25-000110", "0001109357-25-000113", "0001109357-25-000118", "0001109357-25-000122", "0001109357-25-000136", "0001109357-25-000142", "0001145549-25-015724", "0001145549-25-015772", "0001213900-25-024596", "0001539497-25-000975", "0002052113-25-001496", "9999999995-25-001038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/93bbc0eaf3fa354053a93acf.json", "detail_js": "details/93bbc0eaf3fa354053a93acf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/93bbc0eaf3fa354053a93acf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ea3ac45447864c3c83db28f9cd48f09a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c0c1fb6e618a4382bc016068b38b3f75.request.json" }, { "task_id": "971b86890713c9a4c5c6daf7", "question_id": "Q060", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Exelon Corporation's operating margin percentage in 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total operating revenues?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation's operating margin was 18.76% in 2024, calculated as Operating income ($4,319 million) divided by Total operating revenues ($23,028 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the available evidence, the filing metadata was identified for Exelon Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (filing accession/file stem: `0001109357-25-000043` under CIK `0001109357` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). However, because the joint filing is duplicated across multiple co-registrant CIKs within the dataset, queries reading the parsed text failed due to duplicate entry errors and tool memory limits before the Consolidated Statements of Operations could be retrieved. \n\nTherefore, the evidence is insufficient to extract the exact figures for Operating Income and Total Operating Revenues to calculate the 2024 operating margin percentage.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Operating income of $4,319M for 2024, and the reference computes 18.76%. The candidate abstains and gives no operating margin, operating income, or revenue figure, so it fails the core question. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. Its citation support is strong: the accession `0001109357-25-000043`, the CIK, and the file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` match the tool outputs. The duplicate-ID and out-of-memory errors it describes appear in the tool results, and the multiple co-registrant accessions under one file stem support its duplication claim. It does not invent figures. The tool outputs contain no revenue or operating income values, so the abstention is honest about what was retrieved, but it is still incomplete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0279328, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.027011999999999998, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009208, "wall_seconds": 29.444733592001285, "api_seconds": 28.68548645699957, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 38454, "completion_tokens": 1354, "reasoning_tokens": 360, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000074" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/971b86890713c9a4c5c6daf7.json", "detail_js": "details/971b86890713c9a4c5c6daf7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/971b86890713c9a4c5c6daf7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b8fc5c600a954c5f819f8e016caf622e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b15d2191464e4a4c8ac996f44b283611.request.json" }, { "task_id": "29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358", "question_id": "Q060", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Exelon Corporation's operating margin percentage in 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total operating revenues?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation's operating margin was 18.76% in 2024, calculated as Operating income ($4,319 million) divided by Total operating revenues ($23,028 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine Exelon’s 2024 operating margin from the returned evidence. The filing metadata identifies a candidate 2025 filing, but the text query failed, so I don’t have the reported operating income or total operating revenues needed to calculate the percentage.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Operating income of 4319 and the reference computes a 18.76% margin. The candidate abstained, so it gives no margin and no figures, and it is not correct on the answerable question. Its abstention is honest and does not fabricate numbers, which is why correctness is not 0. The tool evidence supports its description: the metadata query returned filing rows for accession 0001109357-25-000043 (a candidate 2025 filing), and the text queries failed with 'Duplicate filing ID in source'. Its claims about what it lacks are therefore well grounded in the tool output, though it did not retrieve the income statement text that the gold evidence cites.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002942, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0019351, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010069, "wall_seconds": 36.2758496080005, "api_seconds": 34.077368063000904, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 30981, "completion_tokens": 1606, "reasoning_tokens": 637, "cache_read_tokens": 13470, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001980", "0000902219-25-000057", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001109357-25-000002", "0001109357-25-000004", "0001109357-25-000006", "0001109357-25-000008", "0001109357-25-000010", "0001109357-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000014", "0001109357-25-000016", "0001109357-25-000022", "0001109357-25-000024", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ], "detail_json": "details/29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358.json", "detail_js": "details/29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/29cac7c7d2935f62d9e8e358.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4c47ee4ab77e405ab986f5bcfebac43e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c6582266069d4372bbdc1c3a76d7e8d0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7b12dccc92e2afb2be77b373", "question_id": "Q060", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Exelon Corporation's operating margin percentage in 2024, calculated as Operating income divided by Total operating revenues?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation's operating margin was 18.76% in 2024, calculated as Operating income ($4,319 million) divided by Total operating revenues ($23,028 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine Exelon’s 2024 operating margin from the returned evidence. It does not include the relevant filing’s operating income or total operating revenues, so I can’t calculate or verify the percentage.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives operating income of 4,319 for 2024 from the Item 8 statement of operations. Revenue ($23,028M) is not in the quoted excerpt, so the reference's full 18.76% figure rests on a value I cannot verify from the gold quote alone. The candidate abstained, saying the returned evidence lacks the relevant operating income and revenue. That matches the tool outputs: the searches returned no rows, and the read and query calls failed with 'Duplicate filing' errors, so the statement is well supported. However, the reference is answerable, so abstention does not earn full correctness, and the candidate gave no percentage or figures. Correctness is low but not zero because the abstention was honest and not a fabricated answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003097125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002091125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001006, "wall_seconds": 47.306314298999496, "api_seconds": 45.28079356800117, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 42495, "completion_tokens": 1622, "reasoning_tokens": 762, "cache_read_tokens": 24670, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001980", "0000902219-25-000057", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001109357-25-000002", "0001109357-25-000004", "0001109357-25-000006", "0001109357-25-000008", "0001109357-25-000010", "0001109357-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000014", "0001109357-25-000016", "0001109357-25-000022", "0001109357-25-000024", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7b12dccc92e2afb2be77b373.json", "detail_js": "details/7b12dccc92e2afb2be77b373.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7b12dccc92e2afb2be77b373.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3558a33ae3ba4ebb8d792d825c750188.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d1e2aedea6d94853865d86975d832d0e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0faf79f0f8bf3efd71c8bc83", "question_id": "Q061", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Overview Table?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin was 15.3% (15.35%) in 2024 ($2,720,706 thousand gross profit on total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "In C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Item 7, *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview*), the table reconciling GAAP gross profits and gross profit margin to non-GAAP adjusted gross profits and adjusted gross profit margin discloses the following for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024:\n\n- **Total revenues:** $17,724,956 thousand ($17,724,956,000)\n- **Total direct costs:** $15,004,250 thousand ($15,004,250,000)\n- **Gross profits:** $2,720,706 thousand ($2,720,706,000)\n- **GAAP Gross profit margin percentage:** **15.3%** \n $$\\left(\\frac{\\$2,720,706}{\\$17,724,956} \\approx 15.3496\\% \\rightarrow 15.3\\%\\right)$$\n\n*(By comparison, Adjusted gross profit margin for 2024 was 15.6%).*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports GAAP gross profit of $2,720,706K, a 15.3% gross profit margin, and total revenues of $17,724,956K. These match the reference and the Overview table in the tool output. The arithmetic checks out: 2,720,706 / 17,724,956 ≈ 15.35%, which rounds to 15.3%. Total direct costs of $15,004,250K are consistent with revenue minus gross profit. The adjusted margin of 15.6% also matches the table. The only minor gap is that the candidate's fiscal-year framing and the precise 15.35% figure are slightly more detailed than the reference, which does not affect correctness. Citation support is strong because the table values appear verbatim in the retrieved passage from the 0001043277-25-000012 filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02994405, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02870325, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012408, "wall_seconds": 31.84547722699972, "api_seconds": 29.923954186999254, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 42834, "completion_tokens": 1569, "reasoning_tokens": 298, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/0faf79f0f8bf3efd71c8bc83.json", "detail_js": "details/0faf79f0f8bf3efd71c8bc83.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0faf79f0f8bf3efd71c8bc83.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1297b672282042c1b8fa726df981be23.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1746d80921cd4b63b71670343132dc24.request.json" }, { "task_id": "39d94a1892658d95c2fb19b9", "question_id": "Q061", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Overview Table?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin was 15.3% (15.35%) in 2024 ($2,720,706 thousand gross profit on total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filings and evidence within the allocated tool budget, the specific \"Overview Table\" containing C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage for fiscal year 2024 was not fully located or extracted. Therefore, the available evidence is insufficient to provide the exact percentage disclosed in that table.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence quotes the Overview Table row with 15.3% GAAP gross profit margin for 2024 and gross profit of 2,720,706. The candidate abstained and gave no figure, so it fails the completeness requirement. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. The candidate's tool evidence does support its narrow claim that the table was not located: the searches only surfaced a 'gross profit margin' hit at offset 74634 in risk-factor text, and the 'GAAP gross profit margin' string was never found. That supports the abstention statement but not any numeric answer, so citation support is moderately high while correctness is zero.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0386411, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0371385, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015026, "wall_seconds": 35.266071826999905, "api_seconds": 33.74878495400117, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57279, "completion_tokens": 1453, "reasoning_tokens": 462, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 13000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/39d94a1892658d95c2fb19b9.json", "detail_js": "details/39d94a1892658d95c2fb19b9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/39d94a1892658d95c2fb19b9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fc9d038529db4d3db43fa5ca4a899ead.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ef03aeed92d54464ab47e6b717922832.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fda6d9ab847fdcad1b28cf4e", "question_id": "Q061", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Overview Table?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin was 15.3% (15.35%) in 2024 ($2,720,706 thousand gross profit on total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t verify the percentage from the available tool output. The filing metadata identifies C.H. Robinson’s 2025 annual filing, but attempts to read its text failed because of a memory error. Thus, I can’t reliably report the GAAP gross profit margin shown in its Overview Table.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 30, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a specific answer (15.3%, from the Overview Table row 2720706 / 15.3%), and the question is answerable in principle, so abstaining earns little credit. The candidate gives no margin figure, so it is not outright wrong, but it fails the core task. Its citation support is weak. The memory-error claim matches the tool output (malloc failure on the 0000080661-25-000002 query). However, the claim that the metadata identifies C.H. Robinson's 2025 annual filing is not supported: the tool outputs never show a company name, and accession prefix 0000080661 does not match C.H. Robinson's filer prefix 0001043277 in the gold evidence. The candidate also never retrieved the gold accession 0001043277-25-000012. The abstention is therefore only partly justified by the tool failures.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002058455, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001128655, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009298, "wall_seconds": 30.10725635000017, "api_seconds": 28.701129107997986, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 23735, "completion_tokens": 1546, "reasoning_tokens": 758, "cache_read_tokens": 13283, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000080661-25-000002", "0001127602-25-000336", "0001127602-25-000346", "0001127602-25-000360", "0001127602-25-000665", "0001127602-25-001546", "0001127602-25-001548", "0001127602-25-001566", "0001127602-25-001568", "0001127602-25-001570", "0001127602-25-001582", "0001127602-25-001801", "0001127602-25-001817", "0001127602-25-002392", "0001127602-25-002395", "0001127602-25-002551", "0001959173-25-000049", "0001959173-25-000055", "0001959173-25-000403", "0001959173-25-000405" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/fda6d9ab847fdcad1b28cf4e.json", "detail_js": "details/fda6d9ab847fdcad1b28cf4e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fda6d9ab847fdcad1b28cf4e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/677af0d1ce5f46259049b431db829129.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9ad1a78a2eae4aa18859c1446c358a3b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0b6d32602f87ab4aa3de1e6e", "question_id": "Q061", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin percentage in fiscal year 2024 as disclosed in its Overview Table?", "reference": "C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s GAAP gross profit margin was 15.3% (15.35%) in 2024 ($2,720,706 thousand gross profit on total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the percentage from the returned evidence. The filing inspected was an Astronics Corporation 8-K, not a C.H. Robinson Worldwide filing, and the evidence does not include C.H. Robinson’s Overview Table.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence is a C.H. Robinson Overview Table giving 2,720,706 gross profit at 15.3% for 2024. The candidate abstained and gave no figure, so it does not match the reference's answer, though it did not state a wrong number. Its abstention is not justified by the reference being unanswerable. Its claims are well supported by the tool outputs: the only filing read was Astronics Corp 8-K 0000008063-25-000002, and the searches for 'Overview Table' and 'GAAP Gross Profit Margin' returned no C.H. Robinson material. The candidate also accurately noted that the 10-K search was incomplete at 500 rows, though it did not say so explicitly. The gold accession 0001043277-25-000012 never appeared in the tool evidence, so the candidate's failure is one of retrieval, not of reporting.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00356908, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00221688, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013522, "wall_seconds": 37.271102792999955, "api_seconds": 35.16057383200314, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47203, "completion_tokens": 1494, "reasoning_tokens": 635, "cache_read_tokens": 24423, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000008063-25-000002", "0000008063-25-000005", "0000008063-25-000008", "0000008063-25-000020", "0000902664-25-000071", "0000919574-25-001528", "0001134007-25-000004", "0001628280-25-005031", "0001628280-25-009427", "0001628280-25-009428", "0001628280-25-009429", "0001628280-25-009435", "0001628280-25-009437", "0001628280-25-009439", "0001628280-25-009442", "0001628280-25-009447", "0001628280-25-009450", "0001628280-25-009502", "0001628280-25-011997", "0002012383-25-001265" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0b6d32602f87ab4aa3de1e6e.json", "detail_js": "details/0b6d32602f87ab4aa3de1e6e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0b6d32602f87ab4aa3de1e6e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5f36ced3096f404091aad87f1de5178e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/896a4287db034d0e8c807e3f690585a3.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dfa706da022a3525d622a96b", "question_id": "Q062", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Gross profit divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin was 35.11% in 2024, calculated as Gross profit ($494,777 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the provided dataset and search queries conducted within the tool budget, the relevant annual filing (Form 10-K) for **Utz Brands, Inc.** for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 was not located in the searched files (`sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` through `sfd-v1-2025-06.parquet`). \n\nTherefore, there is **insufficient evidence** in the accessible filing records to determine Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit, net sales, or gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Gross profit of 494,777 and the margin is 494,777 / 1,409,281 ≈ 35.11%. The candidate abstains and provides no figure, so it misses the required answer. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. Citation support is moderate. The tool outputs do not show the Utz filing, and most DuckDB queries failed with out-of-memory errors, so the candidate's 'not located in searched files' claim is only partly supported. Its own search was incomplete, so the abstention is not well grounded.", "known_cost_usd": 0.030765050000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02968875, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010763, "wall_seconds": 32.557448552001006, "api_seconds": 31.512450995996915, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 43093, "completion_tokens": 1451, "reasoning_tokens": 365, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-027737", "0001193125-25-029164", "0001193125-25-031987", "0001213900-25-018781", "0001493152-25-004604", "0001493152-25-004925", "0001493152-25-008217", "0001493152-25-008362", "0001752724-25-026246", "0001752724-25-026247", "0001752724-25-026248", "0001752724-25-026250", "0001808805-25-000008", "0001823306-25-000007", "0001826000-25-000005", "0001834376-25-000003", "0001868878-25-000011", "0001888524-25-002552", "0001888524-25-002809", "0001890149-25-000001" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/dfa706da022a3525d622a96b.json", "detail_js": "details/dfa706da022a3525d622a96b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dfa706da022a3525d622a96b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3603bcea239a48378db9612194d75220.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7b737eba7ffb47ee89ae2d55ff995bef.request.json" }, { "task_id": "264191f2916639c58663eafd", "question_id": "Q062", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Gross profit divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin was 35.11% in 2024, calculated as Gross profit ($494,777 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Utz Brands, Inc.'s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 (file stem: `0001739566-25-000053`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **Reported Financial Data**\n* **Net sales:** $1,409,281 thousand (or $1,409,281,000)\n* **Cost of goods sold:** $914,504 thousand (or $914,504,000)\n* **Gross profit:** $494,777 thousand (or $494,777,000)\n\n---\n\n### **Gross Profit Margin Calculation**\n$$\\text{Gross Profit Margin} = \\frac{\\text{Gross profit}}{\\text{Net sales}} = \\frac{\\$494,777}{\\$1,409,281} \\approx 0.3510847... \\text{ or } \\mathbf{35.11\\%}$$", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence. Net sales of $1,409,281K, COGS of $914,504K, and gross profit of $494,777K all appear in the Consolidated Statements of Operations returned by read_filing for accession 0001739566-25-000053, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024. The arithmetic is correct: 494,777 / 1,409,281 = 0.35108, which rounds to 35.11%. The candidate's accession and file reference also match the tool output. The only minor gap is that the gold quote is a single gross profit line, while the candidate cites the full statement, which the tool evidence supports.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0348125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03288, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019325, "wall_seconds": 29.284824845999538, "api_seconds": 28.241616711999086, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 57120, "completion_tokens": 1209, "reasoning_tokens": 241, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000019617-25-000261", "0000950170-25-020547", "0000950170-25-038342", "0000950170-25-038345", "0000950170-25-038349", "0001104659-25-012147", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001104659-25-021434", "0001104659-25-021440", "0001415889-25-002885", "0001415889-25-002919", "0001609864-25-000003", "0001739566-25-000049", "0001739566-25-000053", "0001871546-25-000002", "0002001620-25-000003" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/264191f2916639c58663eafd.json", "detail_js": "details/264191f2916639c58663eafd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/264191f2916639c58663eafd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/abb522694d584a6bb9f74c70d5737b1c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f4cc855a6f664d94852e501391d69239.request.json" }, { "task_id": "cec9a900951ef778ab8a5958", "question_id": "Q062", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Gross profit divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin was 35.11% in 2024, calculated as Gross profit ($494,777 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The available evidence does not provide the fiscal-year Gross profit amount needed to calculate the requested percentage. It reports FY2024 net sales of **$1,409.3 million** and a **340-basis-point expansion** in gross profit margin, but not the FY2024 gross profit or the resulting margin percentage. So I can’t calculate the requested ratio from the returned evidence. (Filing `0001739566-25-000049`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, SQL evidence at character offsets 6500–11499.)", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (0001739566-25-000053, Consolidated Statements of Operations) shows Gross profit of 494,777 against net sales of 1,409,281, giving about 35.11%. The candidate abstained and gave no margin figure. Its abstention is understandable because the retrieved tool outputs never surfaced the income statement; the two attempts to query the March files failed with memory errors, and the 35.0% in the transcript is a fourth-quarter figure. Since the reference is answerable, abstention earns little correctness credit. The candidate's partial facts are correct: FY2024 net sales of $1,409.3 million and a 340bps gross margin expansion both appear in the tool output at the stated offsets. Its statement that the retrieved evidence lacks the FY gross profit figure is accurate. Citation support is high because every claim it makes is traceable to the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004321195, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002616895, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017043, "wall_seconds": 40.495284937998804, "api_seconds": 38.47779631999765, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 53567, "completion_tokens": 2079, "reasoning_tokens": 941, "cache_read_tokens": 26917, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-020547", "0000950170-25-038342", "0000950170-25-038349", "0001104659-25-003800", "0001104659-25-003803", "0001104659-25-005592", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001415889-25-002919", "0001739566-25-000014", "0001739566-25-000016", "0001739566-25-000018", "0001739566-25-000020", "0001739566-25-000022", "0001739566-25-000024", "0001739566-25-000026", "0001739566-25-000028", "0001739566-25-000030", "0001739566-25-000032", "0001739566-25-000034", "0001739566-25-000036", "0001739566-25-000039", "0001739566-25-000049", "0001739566-25-000053", "0001739566-25-000111" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/cec9a900951ef778ab8a5958.json", "detail_js": "details/cec9a900951ef778ab8a5958.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/cec9a900951ef778ab8a5958.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b32d42750d944b558dba03213fdc36c1.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/43705292fa84408d9f43b930a3d11291.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e093e4e7459a3a90955bf051", "question_id": "Q062", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Gross profit divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s gross profit margin was 35.11% in 2024, calculated as Gross profit ($494,777 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence identifies Utz Brands’ CIK and a likely 2025 filing, but it does not include the filing’s company identity confirmation or its Gross profit and Net sales figures. I therefore can’t calculate the requested margin from the available evidence.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence (Item 8 Consolidated Statements of Operations) shows Gross profit of 494,777, and the reference gives a margin of 35.11% on Net sales of 1,409,281. The candidate abstains and provides no margin, so it fails the core task. Abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable, which is not the case here. Its citation support is moderately high because the tool outputs contain no Gross profit or Net sales figures, which matches its claim. It slightly overreaches in saying the evidence 'identifies Utz Brands' CIK', since the search returned no rows matching the company name and the tool output does not explicitly confirm the company's identity.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002310735, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001382935, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009278, "wall_seconds": 18.6311304439987, "api_seconds": 17.430568306999703, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 16783, "completion_tokens": 1292, "reasoning_tokens": 518, "cache_read_tokens": 2291, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-020547", "0001104659-25-003800", "0001104659-25-003803", "0001104659-25-005592", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001415889-25-002919", "0001739566-25-000014", "0001739566-25-000016", "0001739566-25-000018", "0001739566-25-000020", "0001739566-25-000022", "0001739566-25-000024", "0001739566-25-000026", "0001739566-25-000028", "0001739566-25-000030", "0001739566-25-000032", "0001739566-25-000034", "0001739566-25-000036", "0001739566-25-000039", "0001739566-25-000049" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/e093e4e7459a3a90955bf051.json", "detail_js": "details/e093e4e7459a3a90955bf051.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e093e4e7459a3a90955bf051.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ad4071150a3845a68bc96d9256ff0030.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c2a89801459a4b15b2c6562b11730843.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b643aa55e49cc781614f58f2", "question_id": "Q063", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "By what dollar amount and percentage did Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increase in 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increased by $102,767 thousand ($102.8 million), or 4% (3.89%), from $2,642,077 thousand in 2023 to $2,744,844 thousand in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from Sabre Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0001597033-25-000027`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the specific segment revenue breakdown table for Travel Solutions comparing 2024 to 2023 was not reached within the allocated tool budget. \n\nTherefore, the available retrieved evidence is insufficient to state the exact dollar amount and percentage increase in Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue in 2024 compared to 2023.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence table gives Travel Solutions revenue of $2,744,844K (2024) vs $2,642,077K (2023), an increase of $102,767K (4%). The candidate abstains and gives no dollar amount or percentage, so it is incorrect. Abstention would only earn full correctness if the question were unanswerable, and it is not. The candidate's citations (accession 0001597033-25-000027 and sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet) match the tool outputs, and its claim that the segment table was not reached is consistent with the transcript, which never returned the table. That makes its stated reason for abstaining reasonably supported, though the tool evidence does not show the table itself.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0341169, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.032934, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011829, "wall_seconds": 34.81280436700035, "api_seconds": 32.04321547900145, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47791, "completion_tokens": 1590, "reasoning_tokens": 258, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b643aa55e49cc781614f58f2.json", "detail_js": "details/b643aa55e49cc781614f58f2.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b643aa55e49cc781614f58f2.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9be5419d7f864e7f93528ea80964f42c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a9001fa273664db4ae97eb096bb27120.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a0e4aba28c69951301f9a506", "question_id": "Q063", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "By what dollar amount and percentage did Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increase in 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increased by $102,767 thousand ($102.8 million), or 4% (3.89%), from $2,642,077 thousand in 2023 to $2,744,844 thousand in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filing records accessed from Sabre Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (accession/file_stem: `0001597033-25-000027`, located in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the company's business segments include **Travel Solutions** and **Hospitality Solutions**. \n\nHowever, because the tool budget was exhausted before reading the specific segment financial tables (such as Note 19, Segment Information, or the Segment Results of Operations in MD&A around character position 163,681), the specific revenue numbers for Travel Solutions for 2024 and 2023 were not retrieved. Consequently, the available evidence is insufficient to state the exact dollar amount and percentage increase.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives the Travel Solutions figures ($2,744,844K in 2024 vs $2,642,077K in 2023, an increase of $102,767K, about 4% or 3.89%). The candidate did not retrieve these numbers and abstained, saying the tool budget ran out. The question is answerable from the filing, and the gold evidence shows the segment table exists, so abstention does not earn credit. The candidate's statements are accurate to the tool evidence: the accession 0001597033-25-000027 is confirmed, the two segments are confirmed, and the position of 'Travel Solutions revenue' near 163,681 is confirmed. It gave no wrong figures, so it is not fully wrong, but it answered none of the required parts. Citation support is high because its claims match the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03159895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03050775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010912, "wall_seconds": 29.892264355001316, "api_seconds": 27.592806845002997, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46409, "completion_tokens": 1036, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001193125-25-100450", "0001193125-25-135052", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000061" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/a0e4aba28c69951301f9a506.json", "detail_js": "details/a0e4aba28c69951301f9a506.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a0e4aba28c69951301f9a506.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3a2386df7c0b4b9783a73e3cfa6b0115.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/29984556b1794ac7ad57d10b375287ab.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2021366343b4481917574080", "question_id": "Q063", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "By what dollar amount and percentage did Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increase in 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increased by $102,767 thousand ($102.8 million), or 4% (3.89%), from $2,642,077 thousand in 2023 to $2,744,844 thousand in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Sabre’s Travel Solutions revenue increased by **$102.767 million** (about **$102.8 million**), or **4%**, from **$2,642.077 million in 2023** to **$2,744.844 million in 2024**.\n\nThe 10-K reports amounts in thousands: $2,744,844 − $2,642,077 = $102,767 thousand. *(Filing `0001597033-25-000027`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, revenue table excerpt at character offset 195000.)*", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the correct dollar change ($102,767 thousand, or $102.767 million, rounded to $102.8 million), the correct 2023 and 2024 Travel Solutions revenue figures ($2,642.077M and $2,744.844M), and the correct 4% change as stated in the filing table. The subtraction checks out. It omits the more precise 3.89% that the reference includes, which is a minor completeness gap. The tool output directly supports the table row values, the 4% change, and the cited filing and offset, which falls within the retrieved table excerpt.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002695945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001456145, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012398, "wall_seconds": 30.71661957499964, "api_seconds": 28.74989187799838, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 34860, "completion_tokens": 1310, "reasoning_tokens": 483, "cache_read_tokens": 17927, "excerpt_characters": 10000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2021366343b4481917574080.json", "detail_js": "details/2021366343b4481917574080.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2021366343b4481917574080.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a4c2fa1e41ee40e3a0ad265d0d3da101.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bdf78eb186024d748fc70eaaa5fffeda.request.json" }, { "task_id": "502f5ab5f7ff203d664d52c6", "question_id": "Q063", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "By what dollar amount and percentage did Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increase in 2024 compared to 2023?", "reference": "Sabre Corporation's Travel Solutions revenue increased by $102,767 thousand ($102.8 million), or 4% (3.89%), from $2,642,077 thousand in 2023 to $2,744,844 thousand in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Sabre Corporation’s Travel Solutions revenue increased by **$42.767 million**, or **about 1.6%**, in 2024 compared with 2023.\n\nThe filing reports revenue of **$2,744.844 million** in 2024 and **$2,642.077 million** in 2023. Calculation: $2,744.844M − $2,642.077M = **$102.767M**; $102.767M ÷ $2,642.077M ≈ **3.9%**. Thus, correction: the increase was **$102.767 million, or about 3.9%**.\n\nSource: Sabre’s 2024 results, filing `0001597033-25-000025` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, “Financial Results” table returned at character offset 7,576 onward.", "correctness": 55, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is $102,767K (about $102.8M), or 4% (3.89%), with 2024 revenue of $2,744,844K and 2023 revenue of $2,642,077K. The candidate's headline figures are wrong: it states '$42.767 million, or about 1.6%', which contradicts its own table values. It then corrects itself in the body to $102.767M and about 3.9%, which matches the reference. The final answer is right, but the self-contradiction and the wrong headline lower correctness substantially. Citation support is strong: the tool output from read_filing (accession 0001597033-25-000025, offset 7576) contains the Financial Results table with Travel Solutions revenue of $2744844 and $2642077, so the cited numbers are supported. The accession differs from the gold evidence (-000027), but the tool output actually returned the -000025 text, so the citation is still supported by the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00329214, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00168634, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016058, "wall_seconds": 27.963793631000954, "api_seconds": 26.549068907999754, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 38403, "completion_tokens": 1524, "reasoning_tokens": 548, "cache_read_tokens": 16904, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/502f5ab5f7ff203d664d52c6.json", "detail_js": "details/502f5ab5f7ff203d664d52c6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/502f5ab5f7ff203d664d52c6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/fe8174229e244a448599db2e529ce60c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b9b7320f983e48bdb7ca704376af5dbb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "95cc9bbaaa010e6878e37378", "question_id": "Q064", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Microsoft Corporation's gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated from its Income Statements?", "reference": "Microsoft Corporation's gross margin was 68.69% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated as Gross margin ($47,833 million) divided by Total revenue ($69,632 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "From Microsoft Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (Accession Number: `0000950170-25-010491`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), Part I, Item 1, **Income Statements**:\n\n### **Reported Figures (Three Months Ended December 31, 2024)**\n* **Total revenue:** $69,632 million\n* **Total cost of revenue:** $21,799 million\n* **Gross margin:** $47,833 million\n\n---\n\n### **Gross Margin Percentage Calculation**\n$$\\text{Gross Margin Percentage} = \\frac{\\text{Gross Margin}}{\\text{Total Revenue}} = \\frac{\\$47,833\\text{ million}}{\\$69,632\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.686940... \\text{ or } \\mathbf{68.69\\%}$$\n\n*(Alternatively, expressed to more decimal places: **68.694%**).*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool output: Total revenue $69,632M, Gross margin $47,833M, and Total cost of revenue $21,799M for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The computation is correct: 47,833 / 69,632 = 0.68694, or 68.69% (68.694% to three decimals). The accession number 0000950170-25-010491 and the 10-Q period of report (20241231) appear in the tool output. The minor gap is that the candidate's '68.694%' is an extra precision figure, not a contradiction. The reference's 68.69% is stated, so the answer is complete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0186567, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0176445, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010122, "wall_seconds": 23.011272408999503, "api_seconds": 21.79693511700134, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27443, "completion_tokens": 1241, "reasoning_tokens": 348, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/95cc9bbaaa010e6878e37378.json", "detail_js": "details/95cc9bbaaa010e6878e37378.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/95cc9bbaaa010e6878e37378.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5accde46091d4ff6992851100df8ec3d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d6921153c4e74d0f8bba4008da4a68cb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4d369f73b315b1c3b0d0b6d5", "question_id": "Q064", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Microsoft Corporation's gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated from its Income Statements?", "reference": "Microsoft Corporation's gross margin was 68.69% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated as Gross margin ($47,833 million) divided by Total revenue ($69,632 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "From Microsoft Corporation's unaudited **Income Statements** in its Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (file stem: `0000950170-25-010491`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n### **Data for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2024**\n*(Amounts in millions)*\n* **Total revenue:** $69,632 million \n * Product revenue: $16,219 million \n * Service and other revenue: $53,413 million \n* **Total cost of revenue:** $21,799 million \n * Product cost of revenue: $3,856 million \n * Service and other cost of revenue: $17,943 million \n* **Gross margin:** $47,833 million ($69,632 − $21,799)\n\n---\n\n### **Calculation**\n$$\\text{Gross Margin Percentage} = \\frac{\\text{Gross Margin}}{\\text{Total Revenue}} \\times 100$$\n\n$$\\text{Gross Margin Percentage} = \\frac{47,833}{69,632} \\times 100 \\approx 68.69399\\%$$\n\n* **Rounded to two decimal places:** **68.69%** (or **68.7%** to one decimal place).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports a gross margin of 68.69%, matching the reference. Its inputs are all correct: total revenue $69,632M, gross margin $47,833M, product and service revenue ($16,219M and $53,413M), and cost of revenue ($21,799M, split into $3,856M and $17,943M). The arithmetic checks out: 47,833/69,632 ≈ 68.694%. The tool output from read_filing contains the Income Statement table with every figure the candidate cites, along with the accession and the sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet file ID. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not explicitly cite the Income Statements section header in its tool output, but the content matches. Deductions are small for that and for the extra one-decimal rounding note.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0175602, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.016086, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014742, "wall_seconds": 21.28959551400112, "api_seconds": 20.562175496997952, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30180, "completion_tokens": 1202, "reasoning_tokens": 346, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4d369f73b315b1c3b0d0b6d5.json", "detail_js": "details/4d369f73b315b1c3b0d0b6d5.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4d369f73b315b1c3b0d0b6d5.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e535e51e22764dae85efb3e37b7b1acc.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/91de83b161a8448d839cecc3b4666708.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b19c838e5a897f961d83fbfa", "question_id": "Q064", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Microsoft Corporation's gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated from its Income Statements?", "reference": "Microsoft Corporation's gross margin was 68.69% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated as Gross margin ($47,833 million) divided by Total revenue ($69,632 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Microsoft’s gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was **68.7%**.\n\nFrom the Income Statements (in millions): total revenue was **$69,632** and gross margin was **$47,833**. Calculation: $47,833 ÷ $69,632 × 100 = **68.69%**, or **68.7%** rounded to one decimal.\n\nSource: Microsoft 10-Q, file_stem `0000950170-25-010491`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; Income Statements passage returned by the scoped SQL query.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports a gross margin of 68.69% (rounded to 68.7%), matching the reference. I checked the arithmetic: 47,833 / 69,632 × 100 ≈ 68.69%. The inputs ($69,632M total revenue, $47,833M gross margin) and the period (three months ended December 31, 2024) match the Income Statements passage in the tool output. The accession 0000950170-25-010491 and the file name are also supported by the tool results. The answer is complete and the units are correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00216447, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00107997, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010845, "wall_seconds": 21.47365462400012, "api_seconds": 20.616893754000557, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 23614, "completion_tokens": 930, "reasoning_tokens": 320, "cache_read_tokens": 8937, "excerpt_characters": 5700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/b19c838e5a897f961d83fbfa.json", "detail_js": "details/b19c838e5a897f961d83fbfa.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b19c838e5a897f961d83fbfa.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/393962c10a1a4a1dbefadd87f23d3033.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a7660db5ffb747048199b1ec9790c02a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "66583ee0478247de96c1e6ae", "question_id": "Q064", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Microsoft Corporation's gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated from its Income Statements?", "reference": "Microsoft Corporation's gross margin was 68.69% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, calculated as Gross margin ($47,833 million) divided by Total revenue ($69,632 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Microsoft’s gross margin percentage for the three months ended December 31, 2024 was **68.7%**.\n\nCalculation from the Income Statements (amounts in millions): gross margin ÷ total revenue × 100 = **$47,833 ÷ $69,632 × 100 = 68.7%**. The figures are in Microsoft’s Form 10-Q, file stem **0000950170-25-010491**, in **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**, at character offsets **3545–15545**.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's inputs match the gold evidence and tool output: total revenue of $69,632M and gross margin of $47,833M for the three months ended December 31, 2024. Its arithmetic is correct (47,833 / 69,632 = 0.68694, or 68.69%). It rounds to 68.7% rather than the reference's 68.69%, which is a minor precision loss, not an error. The stated file stem, parquet file, and character offsets 3545–15545 match the read_filing output. The income statement text in that output contains the cited line items, so the citation is well supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003052095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001457095, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001595, "wall_seconds": 18.04950024699974, "api_seconds": 17.564482502999454, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31017, "completion_tokens": 1043, "reasoning_tokens": 435, "cache_read_tokens": 8707, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/66583ee0478247de96c1e6ae.json", "detail_js": "details/66583ee0478247de96c1e6ae.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/66583ee0478247de96c1e6ae.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6d64bc19e1de476a9b1bc5ec35fc3f82.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d0b8120c031045fe868f1cd1ac11323a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b1c3a78f9b32330e1685fbab", "question_id": "Q065", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues compared to the prior-year period?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenues grew by 19.72% year-over-year, rising from $8,423 million in the quarter ended December 24, 2023 to $10,084 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Qualcomm Incorporated’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (File Stem: `0000804328-25-000011`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Note 1 \"Revenues - QCT revenue streams\"):\n\n### **1. QCT Revenues by Period**\n*(in millions)*\n* **Three Months Ended December 29, 2024:** **$10,084 million**\n* **Three Months Ended December 24, 2023:** **$8,423 million**\n\n*(Breakdown for Q1 FY2025 vs. Q1 FY2024: Handsets: $7,574M vs. $6,687M; Automotive: $961M vs. $598M; IoT: $1,549M vs. $1,138M)*\n\n---\n\n### **2. Year-over-Year Percentage Growth Calculation**\n\n$$\\text{YoY Growth} = \\frac{\\$10,084 - \\$8,423}{\\$8,423} = \\frac{\\$1,661}{\\$8,423} \\approx 0.197198 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{19.72\\%}$$\n\nQualcomm's total QCT revenues grew by **$1,661 million**, or approximately **19.72%** (or **19.7%** rounded to one decimal place), compared to the prior-year period.", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the reference: QCT revenues of $10,084M (Dec 29, 2024) vs. $8,423M (Dec 24, 2023), and YoY growth of 1,661/8,423 = 19.72%. The segment breakdown (Handsets $7,574M vs. $6,687M, Automotive $961M vs. $598M, IoT $1,549M vs. $1,138M) also matches the tool output. The arithmetic is correct. The tool evidence supports the QCT revenue-stream table. However, the candidate labels the source as 'Note 1 \"Revenues - QCT revenue streams\"', which the tool output does not show. The gold evidence places the table under Note 7 (Segment Information), and the tool output only shows a 'Revenues.' paragraph preceding the table, with no note number. That mislabel lowers citation support, though it does not affect the numerical answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03775925, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03630375, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014555, "wall_seconds": 39.76056960599999, "api_seconds": 37.10018470199975, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 53955, "completion_tokens": 1801, "reasoning_tokens": 366, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7999, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b1c3a78f9b32330e1685fbab.json", "detail_js": "details/b1c3a78f9b32330e1685fbab.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b1c3a78f9b32330e1685fbab.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a4bee291d14b45cfa378214a374300d3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cfb12adf55e14015b1f9eac5ed9ce267.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ddc1ab1508f6a86e67fd7c5c", "question_id": "Q065", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues compared to the prior-year period?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenues grew by 19.72% year-over-year, rising from $8,423 million in the quarter ended December 24, 2023 to $10,084 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Qualcomm Incorporated's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000804328-25-000011`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Note 2, *Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items – Revenues*):\n\n### **Total QCT Revenues:**\n- **Three Months Ended December 29, 2024:** **$10,084 million**\n- **Three Months Ended December 24, 2023:** **$8,423 million**\n\n*(Breakdown by revenue stream for the three months ended December 29, 2024 vs. December 24, 2023)*:\n- Handsets: $7,574 million vs. $6,687 million\n- Automotive: $961 million vs. $598 million\n- IoT: $1,549 million vs. $1,138 million\n\n---\n\n### **Year-over-Year Percentage Growth Calculation:**\n$$\\text{Percentage Growth} = \\frac{\\$10,084 - \\$8,423}{\\$8,423} = \\frac{\\$1,661}{\\$8,423} \\approx 0.197198 \\text{ or } \\mathbf{19.72\\%}$$\n\nQualcomm's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues was approximately **19.72%** (or **19.7%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core figures match the reference and the tool evidence: Total QCT revenues of $10,084M (quarter ended Dec 29, 2024) vs. $8,423M (Dec 24, 2023), in millions as stated. The growth calculation (1,661 / 8,423) gives about 19.72%, which matches the reference. The intermediate decimal (0.197198) is slightly off from the exact 0.197194, but the final percentage is correct. The handset, automotive, and IoT breakdowns match the Note 2 table in the read_filing output, and the accession and Note 2 citation are supported. The candidate did not overstate its sources. Minor deduction for the small arithmetic imprecision in the intermediate decimal.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05504175, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05255025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024915, "wall_seconds": 32.35855724599969, "api_seconds": 30.533778465998694, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 87637, "completion_tokens": 1469, "reasoning_tokens": 311, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005625" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ddc1ab1508f6a86e67fd7c5c.json", "detail_js": "details/ddc1ab1508f6a86e67fd7c5c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ddc1ab1508f6a86e67fd7c5c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/48dff1cb4c1646f0ad3ddb1865c27b14.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1e9d00a3374a4177ad33dbcffc57b64f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3e41af7a51ce3d5dbdb217d0", "question_id": "Q065", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues compared to the prior-year period?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenues grew by 19.72% year-over-year, rising from $8,423 million in the quarter ended December 24, 2023 to $10,084 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Qualcomm’s total QCT revenues increased **approximately 19.7% year over year**.\n\nThe 10-Q reports total QCT revenues of **$10,084 million** for the three months ended December 29, 2024, versus **$8,423 million** for the three months ended December 24, 2023. Calculation: \\((10{,}084 - 8{,}423) / 8{,}423 \\times 100 \\approx 19.72\\%\\).\n\n**Source:** filing `0000804328-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, QCT revenue-stream table (SQL text query evidence).", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: total QCT revenues of $10,084M (quarter ended Dec 29, 2024) versus $8,423M (Dec 24, 2023), a 19.72% year-over-year increase. The arithmetic checks out: (10,084 - 8,423) / 8,423 = 19.72%. The units (millions) and dates are correct. The tool output contains the QCT revenue-stream table with these exact figures and column headers, and the accession 0000804328-25-000011 and file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet match the query results. The only minor gap is that the candidate rounds to 19.7% in its headline, which is consistent with the 19.72% it reports.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00216991, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0011622100000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010077, "wall_seconds": 26.93412600099873, "api_seconds": 25.90447342799962, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 27291, "completion_tokens": 1076, "reasoning_tokens": 300, "cache_read_tokens": 13691, "excerpt_characters": 3600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001888316-25-000017", "0001888316-25-000024", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/3e41af7a51ce3d5dbdb217d0.json", "detail_js": "details/3e41af7a51ce3d5dbdb217d0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3e41af7a51ce3d5dbdb217d0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc75202f434b47d2afcda302e83309ac.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/12a1a1269fc44301be8ab6515a3a73ca.request.json" }, { "task_id": "eb05b3d3ea8580d4d38bf80d", "question_id": "Q065", "difficulty": "hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what was Qualcomm Incorporated's year-over-year percentage growth in total QCT revenues compared to the prior-year period?", "reference": "Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenues grew by 19.72% year-over-year, rising from $8,423 million in the quarter ended December 24, 2023 to $10,084 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the year-over-year percentage from the returned evidence. The filings were located, but I could not retrieve the relevant QCT revenue figures to calculate the change.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable. (10,084 − 8,423) / 8,423 = 19.72%, so the candidate's abstention is wrong, and it earns no correctness credit. The tool evidence does not contain the QCT figures: read_filing and duckdb_query returned 'Duplicate filing' errors, and the search returned no rows. The candidate accurately reports that it could not retrieve the figures, so its statement is supported. It did not read the Feb-2025 file, which the tool output lists under accession 0000804328 (file_stem 0000804328-25-000011), the gold source. Its retrieval effort was incomplete, but its claim about what it found is faithful to the tool results.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00250747, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00159887, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009086, "wall_seconds": 29.845711059000678, "api_seconds": 28.883953203996498, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 34410, "completion_tokens": 1172, "reasoning_tokens": 358, "cache_read_tokens": 19187, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/eb05b3d3ea8580d4d38bf80d.json", "detail_js": "details/eb05b3d3ea8580d4d38bf80d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/eb05b3d3ea8580d4d38bf80d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ae68a60d365d41c086b107ef6660153b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f8596c50b5414585b6a38fc99a8f3f72.request.json" }, { "task_id": "223c156cffee35cf4d88f201", "question_id": "Q066", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025) and Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024), which company achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points did its operating margin exceed the other's?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation achieved a higher operating margin of 62.42% (Operating income $81,453 million on revenue of $130,497 million), exceeding Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin of 32.00% (Operating income $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion) by 30.42 percentage points (or 3,042 basis points).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings retrieved:\n\n### 1. **NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended January 26, 2025 / FY2025)**\n- **Filing Stem:** `0001045810-25-000023` (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`)\n- From the Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue and Segment tables:\n - **Total Revenue:** $130,497 million ($130.497 billion)\n - **Operating Income:** $81,453 million ($81.453 billion)\n - **Operating Margin Percentage:** **62.4%** (or $\\frac{\\$81,453}{\\$130,497} \\approx 62.417\\%$)\n\n---\n\n### 2. **Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024 / FY2024)**\n- **Filing Stem:** `0001652044-25-000014` (File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`)\n- **Limitation:** The tool budget was exhausted after locating Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K and indexing positions for its Consolidated Statements of Income / Income from Operations, before retrieving the specific revenue and operating income figures from the parsed markdown text.\n\n---\n\n### **Conclusion**\nWhile NVIDIA Corporation's FY2025 operating margin was verified from its Form 10-K to be **62.4%**, Alphabet Inc.'s exact operating income and revenue figures for FY2024 could not be extracted before the tool budget was exhausted. Consequently, the available evidence is insufficient under the tool budget constraint to calculate the exact percentage point difference between the two companies' operating margins.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answers the question: NVIDIA's operating margin is about 62.42% and Alphabet's is about 32%, a gap of roughly 30 percentage points. The candidate correctly reports NVIDIA's FY2025 operating income ($81,453M) and revenue ($130,497M), and its 62.4% margin is supported by the retrieved income-statement percentage table. However, it does not retrieve Alphabet's operating income or revenue, does not compute the margin, and does not state which company is higher or the difference. Because the reference is answerable, the abstention does not earn full correctness, and the answer is only partly correct. Citation support is strong for the NVIDIA figures and the Alphabet filing identification, which appear in the tool outputs. The candidate also honestly flags its missing Alphabet data, and no Alphabet figures are fabricated.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05077445, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04894725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018272, "wall_seconds": 43.42234476399972, "api_seconds": 39.57744318200275, "api_attempts": 11, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 73235, "completion_tokens": 2060, "reasoning_tokens": 510, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ], "detail_json": "details/223c156cffee35cf4d88f201.json", "detail_js": "details/223c156cffee35cf4d88f201.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/223c156cffee35cf4d88f201.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a5b5d545e79f4967b8c79f17364984c8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4f3b1831493249ff99d957868c508b2e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fdd1465f2802cabb9b80e12e", "question_id": "Q066", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025) and Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024), which company achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points did its operating margin exceed the other's?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation achieved a higher operating margin of 62.42% (Operating income $81,453 million on revenue of $130,497 million), exceeding Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin of 32.00% (Operating income $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion) by 30.42 percentage points (or 3,042 basis points).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from the available filings within the tool budget:\n\n### **1. NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025)**\n- **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n- From the **Results of Operations** table (*certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of revenue*):\n - **Operating Income as a % of Revenue (Operating Margin):** **62.4%**\n - **Revenue:** $130,497 million\n - **Operating Income:** $81,453 million\n - **Calculation:** $\\frac{\\$81,453}{\\$130,497} \\approx 62.417\\% \\approx 62.4\\%$\n\n---\n\n### **2. Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024)**\n- The filing for Alphabet Inc. (`0001652044-25-000014` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified in the index, but due to exhausting the tool budget before reading Alphabet's financial statements, the filing content for Alphabet Inc. could not be retrieved.\n\n---\n\n### **Conclusion / Limitation**\nBecause the tool budget was exhausted before reading the Form 10-K for Alphabet Inc. (FY2024), the available evidence is **insufficient** to complete the comparison and determine by how many percentage points one company's operating margin exceeded the other's.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: NVIDIA's operating margin is 62.4%, which is correct, and the tool output includes NVIDIA's revenue ($130,497M) and operating income ($81,453M). The candidate's NVIDIA figures and calculation are supported by the read_filing output. However, the candidate never retrieved Alphabet's operating income or revenue, so it did not answer the comparison, did not identify which company was higher, and gave no percentage-point difference. Its abstention is not justified because the reference shows the question was answerable, and the candidate's claim that the Alphabet filing content was not retrieved is accurate. The reference's Alphabet margin of 32.00% is itself slightly off (112,390 / 350,000 ≈ 32.1%), but the candidate did not state any Alphabet figure, so this does not affect the score. Correctness reflects only the partial NVIDIA result.", "known_cost_usd": 0.06281535, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.060144750000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026706, "wall_seconds": 34.40183691300081, "api_seconds": 31.93285403599657, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 98324, "completion_tokens": 1715, "reasoning_tokens": 446, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fdd1465f2802cabb9b80e12e.json", "detail_js": "details/fdd1465f2802cabb9b80e12e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fdd1465f2802cabb9b80e12e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/70a1667cac964851a636facb1c533cb2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0a3193963bdb4b7f875b6dde1aabfd37.request.json" }, { "task_id": "aab649c74f5f13442a94dadb", "question_id": "Q066", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025) and Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024), which company achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points did its operating margin exceed the other's?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation achieved a higher operating margin of 62.42% (Operating income $81,453 million on revenue of $130,497 million), exceeding Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin of 32.00% (Operating income $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion) by 30.42 percentage points (or 3,042 basis points).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "**NVIDIA achieved the higher operating margin.** Using operating income ÷ revenue:\n\n- **NVIDIA FY2025:** $81,453 million ÷ $130,497 million = **62.42%**\n- **Alphabet FY2024:** $112,390 million ÷ $350,018 million = **32.11%**\n\nNVIDIA’s margin exceeded Alphabet’s by **30.31 percentage points**.\n\nEvidence: NVIDIA Form 10-K, `file_stem` `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id` `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, SQL result at parsed-text offset 213,388; Alphabet Form 10-K, `file_stem` `0001652044-25-000014`, same `file_id`, offset 172,251. The filings’ summary tables provide the revenues and operating-income amounts used above.", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 93, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct from the cited figures: NVIDIA 81,453/130,497 = 62.42% and Alphabet 112,390/350,018 = 32.11%, a gap of 30.31 percentage points. The reference uses 32.00% for Alphabet, which does not match its own stated inputs ($112,390M on $350.0B gives about 32.1%), so its 30.42-point gap is inconsistent. The candidate matches the reference on the winner and method but differs on the final gap, so correctness is reduced rather than full. Citation support is strong: the tool output shows NVIDIA revenue 130497 and operating income 81453, Alphabet revenue 350018 and operating income 112390, the corresponding accessions, file_id, and offsets 213388 and 172251. The only minor gap is that the candidate's 'summary tables' wording is a slight generalization.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0028017100000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00144371, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001358, "wall_seconds": 31.62376834799943, "api_seconds": 30.251818839999032, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26346, "completion_tokens": 1891, "reasoning_tokens": 886, "cache_read_tokens": 10446, "excerpt_characters": 3400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-012415", "0000950170-25-020581", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-020620", "0000950170-25-021536", "0000950170-25-021555", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022825", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-023879", "0000950170-25-025147", "0000950170-25-028107", "0000950170-25-028131", "0000950170-25-029764", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001415889-25-003895", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001950047-25-000965", "0001950047-25-000967", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/aab649c74f5f13442a94dadb.json", "detail_js": "details/aab649c74f5f13442a94dadb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/aab649c74f5f13442a94dadb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/527b9b9d87fc4c76893e4c6a284a14a5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/30a6bc4c99564d3fa048ced56511683f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd", "question_id": "Q066", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing NVIDIA Corporation (Form 10-K for FY2025) and Alphabet Inc. (Form 10-K for FY2024), which company achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points did its operating margin exceed the other's?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation achieved a higher operating margin of 62.42% (Operating income $81,453 million on revenue of $130,497 million), exceeding Alphabet Inc.'s operating margin of 32.00% (Operating income $112,390 million on revenues of $350.0 billion) by 30.42 percentage points (or 3,042 basis points).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to calculate the comparison: it does not include the relevant operating income and revenue figures from NVIDIA’s FY2025 10-K or Alphabet’s FY2024 10-K. I therefore can’t substantiate which company had the higher operating margin or the percentage-point difference.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives NVIDIA FY2025 operating income of $81,453M and Alphabet FY2024 operating income of $112,390M, so the candidate's abstention is not justified and it provides none of the required comparison. The reference's arithmetic is also off: Alphabet's FY2024 revenue of about $350,018M gives a margin near 32.1%, not 32.00%, and the difference is about 30.3 percentage points, not 30.42. Even so, the candidate gives no answer at all. For citation_support, the tool outputs show no income statement figures were retrieved (the 8-K was off-target, one read hit a duplicate-accession error, and the searches returned no rows), so the candidate's statement that the returned evidence is insufficient is accurately supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004113485, "unknown_cost_attempts": 1, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002565985, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015475, "wall_seconds": 33.09638011500101, "api_seconds": 30.94421151499955, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 1, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 43413, "completion_tokens": 1616, "reasoning_tokens": 786, "cache_read_tokens": 15721, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-021536", "0000950170-25-021555", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022825", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-023879", "0000950170-25-025147", "0000950170-25-028107", "0000950170-25-028131", "0000950170-25-029764", "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000016", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001950047-25-000578", "0001950047-25-000967", "0001950047-25-000975", "0001950047-25-001130", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached", "unknown_api_cost" ], "detail_json": "details/c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd.json", "detail_js": "details/c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c73207874e8bd9143c6fa8cd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b4a2fb7dac414b5bb34c8c9a25746ca0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cab538deb0ba43a7ad8967e6470f8047.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6f66ce0783853753b31cc2a6", "question_id": "Q067", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Free Cash Flow generated by the two companies, and which company generated more Free Cash Flow?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc. generated $72,764 million ($72.764 billion) in Free Cash Flow (operating cash flow of $125,299 million minus CapEx of $52,535 million), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. generated $38,219 million ($38.219 billion). Alphabet generated $34,545 million ($34.545 billion) more Free Cash Flow than Amazon in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches conducted within the available tool budget, the relevant Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Free Cash Flow disclosures for Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. for fiscal year 2024 were not fully retrieved from the filings before exhausting the tool budget.\n\nTherefore, the evidence is **insufficient** to compute and compare the Free Cash Flow generated by Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Alphabet's 2024 capex of $52,535M and Amazon's free cash flow of $38,219M. The candidate abstained and gave no figures, no difference, and no winner. Because the question is answerable, abstention is incorrect and earns no correctness credit. Citation support is moderate. The tool trace does show the candidate located Alphabet's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows but never extracted operating cash flow, capex, or any Amazon free cash flow figure, so its claim that retrieval was incomplete is consistent with the evidence. However, the trace does not show the tool budget was exhausted, and the candidate cites no specific evidence for its conclusion.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04471045, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04324725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014632, "wall_seconds": 33.1874934740008, "api_seconds": 30.79531214599774, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 65025, "completion_tokens": 1454, "reasoning_tokens": 320, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138", "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6f66ce0783853753b31cc2a6.json", "detail_js": "details/6f66ce0783853753b31cc2a6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6f66ce0783853753b31cc2a6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/56068bc176304547bfc4858065a0af7d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/253cda981ab44b77af2b26d3a6fe1f66.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a63ae5f8fd2eb30ce8e86f9d", "question_id": "Q067", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Free Cash Flow generated by the two companies, and which company generated more Free Cash Flow?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc. generated $72,764 million ($72.764 billion) in Free Cash Flow (operating cash flow of $125,299 million minus CapEx of $52,535 million), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. generated $38,219 million ($38.219 billion). Alphabet generated $34,545 million ($34.545 billion) more Free Cash Flow than Amazon in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from the filings within the allowed tool budget:\n\n1. **Alphabet Inc.**'s 2024 Form 10-K was identified (`file_stem: 0001652044-25-000014` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) and **Amazon.com, Inc.**'s 2024 Form 10-K was identified (`file_stem: 0001018724-25-000004` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n2. However, the tool budget was exhausted before retrieving the complete Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or Free Cash Flow reconciliations/disclosures (operating cash flows and capital expenditures / purchases of property and equipment) for both companies for fiscal year 2024.\n\nTherefore, the evidence returned is **insufficient** to compute the exact Free Cash Flow for Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc., determine the difference, or state which company generated more Free Cash Flow in fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Alphabet FCF is $72,764M (operating cash flow $125,299M minus CapEx $52,535M), Amazon FCF is $38,219M, and the difference is $34,545M with Alphabet higher. The candidate abstains and says the evidence is insufficient, so it gives none of the required figures and fails the completeness requirement. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which this one is not. Citation support is partial. The tool outputs do confirm the two 2024 10-K file stems (0001652044-25-000014 and 0001018724-25-000004), so the identification claim holds. However, the claim that the tool budget was exhausted appears nowhere in the tool outputs. The candidate also does not acknowledge that the Alphabet cash flow search located the statement heading and the operating cash flow line position, or that the Amazon FCF table was in the gold evidence it did not retrieve.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0398567, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0383445, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015122, "wall_seconds": 33.78751499600003, "api_seconds": 31.94399441800124, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58188, "completion_tokens": 1612, "reasoning_tokens": 457, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/a63ae5f8fd2eb30ce8e86f9d.json", "detail_js": "details/a63ae5f8fd2eb30ce8e86f9d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a63ae5f8fd2eb30ce8e86f9d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/14509c7ab3964159a68cc6b4469f63c7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ab9aa4ff1eee4c3d95aaf7ef0cc50d0f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fd9dba3cfc5c3cb3bc43b3ab", "question_id": "Q067", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Free Cash Flow generated by the two companies, and which company generated more Free Cash Flow?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc. generated $72,764 million ($72.764 billion) in Free Cash Flow (operating cash flow of $125,299 million minus CapEx of $52,535 million), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. generated $38,219 million ($38.219 billion). Alphabet generated $34,545 million ($34.545 billion) more Free Cash Flow than Amazon in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to determine the difference in Free Cash Flow for fiscal 2024 or which company generated more. It identifies the companies’ filings and contains Amazon’s discussion of free cash flow, but it does not provide comparable 2024 Free Cash Flow amounts for both companies.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a fully answerable result: Alphabet FCF of $72,764M (OCF $125,299M minus CapEx $52,535M), Amazon FCF of $38,219M, a difference of $34,545M, and Alphabet as the higher generator. The candidate abstains, saying the evidence is insufficient. Because the reference is answerable, the abstention earns little correctness credit, and the candidate provides none of the required figures or the comparison. Its citation support is comparatively strong: the tool outputs show Amazon's free cash flow discussion and an Alphabet balance-sheet snippet, but no FCF amounts, CapEx figures, or OCF values for either company, so the claim that the retrieved evidence lacks comparable 2024 FCF amounts is accurate to the tool evidence. The gold evidence quotes (CapEx of 52,535 and Amazon FCF of 38219) do not appear in the tool outputs, which is why the candidate's abstention is supported by what it retrieved, even though the answer itself is not correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0037223449999999997, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002371445, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013509, "wall_seconds": 76.14989724000043, "api_seconds": 73.66272809299699, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 37930, "completion_tokens": 2019, "reasoning_tokens": 786, "cache_read_tokens": 15522, "excerpt_characters": 2600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-012415", "0000950170-25-020581", "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-020620", "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0001973141-25-000015", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fd9dba3cfc5c3cb3bc43b3ab.json", "detail_js": "details/fd9dba3cfc5c3cb3bc43b3ab.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fd9dba3cfc5c3cb3bc43b3ab.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0745b8b7cce24738a09cef77fecc72fb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/520c3670aa3a4d0a8c2af3fa1f04cdd6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "eefc612c8d20ad61dc49eada", "question_id": "Q067", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Free Cash Flow generated by the two companies, and which company generated more Free Cash Flow?", "reference": "Alphabet Inc. generated $72,764 million ($72.764 billion) in Free Cash Flow (operating cash flow of $125,299 million minus CapEx of $52,535 million), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. generated $38,219 million ($38.219 billion). Alphabet generated $34,545 million ($34.545 billion) more Free Cash Flow than Amazon in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the difference from the returned evidence. The Amazon filing passage confirms that it discusses free cash flow, but it does not provide either company’s fiscal-year 2024 free cash flow figure. The Alphabet filing’s figure was not retrieved, so I can’t calculate the difference or say which company generated more.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: it gives Alphabet FCF of $72,764M, Amazon FCF of $38,219M, and a $34,545M difference, so abstaining is not the correct outcome. The candidate gives no figures, no difference, and no company comparison, so it fails the core question. Its abstention is honest about the tool evidence: the retrieved Amazon passage is a narrative overview with no FCF number, the Alphabet FCF text was never retrieved, and the tool budget was exhausted. The candidate's statements about what the tool evidence does and does not show are accurate. It does not mention the Alphabet capex line or the Amazon FCF table that appear in the gold evidence, but those were not in its retrieved outputs, so this does not make its claims unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004637645, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002937345, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017003, "wall_seconds": 35.025100876999204, "api_seconds": 33.45807806099947, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 9, "tool_processed": 9, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 1, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55785, "completion_tokens": 1665, "reasoning_tokens": 628, "cache_read_tokens": 24402, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001018724-25-000026", "0001018724-25-000028", "0001018724-25-000030", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000016", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001652044-25-000027", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/eefc612c8d20ad61dc49eada.json", "detail_js": "details/eefc612c8d20ad61dc49eada.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/eefc612c8d20ad61dc49eada.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d7334c123dc740a8aeb4d8f6a346fb58.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/39c3938685104187a0d0d2a69ba755a2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6847e4e589bd93446ee8922a", "question_id": "Q068", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which company dedicated a higher percentage of its revenue to Research and Development (R&D intensity), and what was the difference in percentage points?", "reference": "Intel Corporation had a substantially higher R&D intensity of 31.07% ($16.5 billion R&D on $53.1 billion revenue) compared to NVIDIA Corporation's R&D intensity of 9.90% ($12,914 million R&D on $130,497 million revenue). Intel's R&D intensity was 21.17 percentage points higher than NVIDIA's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected within the available tool budget:\n\n- **Intel Corporation (FY2024)**: The Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024 was located in file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` (`file_stem`: `0000050863-25-000009`). However, before the specific line items for FY2024 Revenue and Research and Development (R&D) expense could be retrieved from the Consolidated Statements of Operations, the tool budget was exhausted.\n- **NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025)**: NVIDIA's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified in the metadata index, but could not be queried or read before exhausting the tool budget.\n\n**Conclusion:**\nThe returned evidence is **insufficient** to determine the exact revenue, R&D expenses, R&D intensity percentages, or the percentage point difference for Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025).", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the filings: Intel's FY2024 R&D of $16.5B on $53.1B revenue gives about 31.07%, and NVIDIA's FY2025 R&D of $12,914M on $130,497M revenue gives about 9.90%, a difference of about 21.17 points. The candidate abstained and gave none of these figures, so it does not answer the question. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not, so correctness is very low. Its citation support is fairly good: the tool output does show the Intel 10-K (accession 0000050863-25-000009, period ending December 28, 2024) and the NVIDIA accession 0001045810-25-000023 in the metadata. The candidate's statement that NVIDIA's fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 does not appear in the tool output, which is a minor unsupported detail. Its account of the tool budget being exhausted matches the transcript, which ends before any R&D or revenue line items are read.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0473572, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.045648, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017092, "wall_seconds": 71.26582542000142, "api_seconds": 69.12054063099822, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 67591, "completion_tokens": 2073, "reasoning_tokens": 514, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000070", "0000050863-25-000074", "0000050863-25-000089", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6847e4e589bd93446ee8922a.json", "detail_js": "details/6847e4e589bd93446ee8922a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6847e4e589bd93446ee8922a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1530244bfb0349a5bfa594100e8b6088.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/43f310c4e00d4816b3610609f8dfc3ab.request.json" }, { "task_id": "93364fc046db8d81d7b72a85", "question_id": "Q068", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which company dedicated a higher percentage of its revenue to Research and Development (R&D intensity), and what was the difference in percentage points?", "reference": "Intel Corporation had a substantially higher R&D intensity of 31.07% ($16.5 billion R&D on $53.1 billion revenue) compared to NVIDIA Corporation's R&D intensity of 9.90% ($12,914 million R&D on $130,497 million revenue). Intel's R&D intensity was 21.17 percentage points higher than NVIDIA's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings retrieved:\n\n### 1. Intel Corporation (FY2024)\nFrom Intel Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000050863-25-000009`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), **Consolidated Statements of Operations**:\n* **Net revenue**: $53,101 million\n* **Research and development**: $16,546 million\n* **R&D intensity (R&D as a % of revenue)**:\n $$\\frac{16,546}{53,101} \\approx 31.1595\\% \\approx 31.16\\%$$\n\n---\n\n### 2. NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025)\nAlthough NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified, the tool budget was exhausted before reading the exact revenue and R&D expense figures from NVIDIA's Consolidated Statements of Income.\n\n---\n\n### Conclusion & Limitation\nDue to the tool call limit being exhausted before reading NVIDIA's Consolidated Statements of Income, the evidence is **insufficient** to complete the comparison and compute the percentage point difference.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The Intel figures are correct and supported by the Consolidated Statements of Operations text in the tool output: net revenue $53,101M and R&D $16,546M give 31.16%. The reference's 31.07% uses rounded $16.5B, so the small gap is acceptable. The NVIDIA side is not answered. The reference is answerable, since NVIDIA's R&D ($12,914M) and revenue ($130,497M) were obtainable from the located filing, and the candidate's abstention does not earn full credit. The candidate also does not give the requested comparison or the percentage-point difference. The claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not explicitly shown in the tool outputs, and the NVIDIA filing location it found was never read, so that part of the citation support is weak.", "known_cost_usd": 0.048209300000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.045976500000000003, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022328, "wall_seconds": 71.876164461999, "api_seconds": 70.03093476100003, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 74370, "completion_tokens": 1852, "reasoning_tokens": 505, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 26000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/93364fc046db8d81d7b72a85.json", "detail_js": "details/93364fc046db8d81d7b72a85.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/93364fc046db8d81d7b72a85.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a29784c8a81c490090bda7ab6614814c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e7853ca9093644cd8da15892f77b47f8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2f21deccbac57c1c1f726d81", "question_id": "Q068", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which company dedicated a higher percentage of its revenue to Research and Development (R&D intensity), and what was the difference in percentage points?", "reference": "Intel Corporation had a substantially higher R&D intensity of 31.07% ($16.5 billion R&D on $53.1 billion revenue) compared to NVIDIA Corporation's R&D intensity of 9.90% ($12,914 million R&D on $130,497 million revenue). Intel's R&D intensity was 21.17 percentage points higher than NVIDIA's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to determine which company had higher R&D intensity or the percentage-point difference. It confirms the Intel FY2024 and NVIDIA FY2025 filings, but does not provide the revenue and total R&D expense figures needed to calculate and compare R&D as a percentage of revenue.", "correctness": 8, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence supplies Intel's $16.5B R&D and NVIDIA's $12,914M R&D, and the revenue figures are standard public numbers. The reference arithmetic checks out (16.5/53.1 = 31.07%; 12,914/130,497 = 9.90%; difference 21.17 pp). The candidate abstained and gave no figures, so it fails the question. Missing evidence does not excuse this, because the reference is not unanswerable. Citation support is high because the candidate's claims match the tool outputs: the filing headers confirm the Intel FY2024 and NVIDIA FY2025 10-Ks, and the retrieved text does not include revenue or the $12,914M R&D income-statement line (only a stock-comp R&D row of 3423 appears). The retrieved snippets were incomplete, but the candidate reported that accurately.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00515302, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0031755200000000003, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019775, "wall_seconds": 70.9637963719997, "api_seconds": 68.10120676000042, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55366, "completion_tokens": 1930, "reasoning_tokens": 851, "cache_read_tokens": 20387, "excerpt_characters": 9200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/2f21deccbac57c1c1f726d81.json", "detail_js": "details/2f21deccbac57c1c1f726d81.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2f21deccbac57c1c1f726d81.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d06ef60293994d8395f36f55b1a2dc46.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3a9e070cfcde461aa3adf10c786ba74c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9899539d51238ce4101e98e8", "question_id": "Q068", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Intel Corporation (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which company dedicated a higher percentage of its revenue to Research and Development (R&D intensity), and what was the difference in percentage points?", "reference": "Intel Corporation had a substantially higher R&D intensity of 31.07% ($16.5 billion R&D on $53.1 billion revenue) compared to NVIDIA Corporation's R&D intensity of 9.90% ($12,914 million R&D on $130,497 million revenue). Intel's R&D intensity was 21.17 percentage points higher than NVIDIA's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The available evidence confirms the relevant Intel FY2024 and NVIDIA FY2025 10-K filings, but it does not provide their R&D expense and revenue figures. I therefore can’t calculate either company’s R&D intensity or the percentage-point difference from the returned evidence.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Intel's $16.5B R&D and NVIDIA's $12,914M R&D (with revenues) support a 31.07% vs 9.90% intensity and a 21.17 percentage-point gap. The candidate abstains and computes nothing, so it gets none of the required values. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which it is not here, so correctness is very low. Citation support is fairly high because the tool outputs really do lack the R&D expense and revenue figures: the Intel excerpts stop before any R&D amount, the read_filing search for 'Research and development expenses' returned found:false, and the NVIDIA excerpt gives only a cumulative '$58.2 billion since inception' figure, not annual expense. The candidate's claim that the returned evidence lacks these figures is therefore accurate, though it does not show the question was unanswerable, and it does not use the gold quotes, which were not in the tool results.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003940105, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002501805, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014383, "wall_seconds": 32.34760396699858, "api_seconds": 30.118887452001218, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 42801, "completion_tokens": 1616, "reasoning_tokens": 509, "cache_read_tokens": 16748, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001921094-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9899539d51238ce4101e98e8.json", "detail_js": "details/9899539d51238ce4101e98e8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9899539d51238ce4101e98e8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4bcaeed814334c178e4c1605a4fba4d7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/255687201f994ac58574532d30305ca7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7bf7c73d4b75a016d70f0ddf", "question_id": "Q069", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing year-over-year revenue growth rates between NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs FY2024) and Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs FY2023), what was the difference in growth rates?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation grew its revenue by 114.20% (rising from $60,922M to $130,497M), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. grew its net sales by 10.99% (rising from $574,785M to $637,959M). NVIDIA's growth rate was 103.21 percentage points higher than Amazon's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filings and evidence:\n\n### 1. NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs. FY2024)\nFrom NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, **Consolidated Statements of Income**):\n* **FY2025 Revenue** (Year ended Jan 26, 2025): **$130,497 million**\n* **FY2024 Revenue** (Year ended Jan 28, 2024): **$60,922 million**\n\n$$\\text{NVIDIA YoY Revenue Growth Rate} = \\frac{130,497 - 60,922}{60,922} = \\frac{69,575}{60,922} \\approx 114.2033\\% \\quad (\\text{or } 114\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### 2. Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs. FY2023)\n* **Limitation / Insufficient Evidence:** The tool budget was exhausted before reading the consolidated statements of operations from Amazon.com, Inc.'s FY2024 Form 10-K (`file_stem: 0001018724-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). \n\nConsequently, the available evidence is insufficient to calculate Amazon.com, Inc.'s FY2024 vs. FY2023 revenue growth rate and the exact difference between the two growth rates using only the returned evidence.", "correctness": 30, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The NVIDIA part is correct: revenue of $130,497M (FY2025) and $60,922M (FY2024) matches the income statement in the tool output, and the growth of about 114.20% is right (69,575/60,922). The candidate abstained on Amazon, but the reference shows the Amazon net sales figures ($574,785M and $637,959M, growth 10.99%) were answerable, so the abstention is not justified. The final 103.21-point difference is therefore missing. The claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not visible in the tool evidence, a minor unsupported statement. Citations for the NVIDIA figures and filing identifiers are supported by the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04872745, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04688925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018382, "wall_seconds": 37.067611976999615, "api_seconds": 33.90344795499914, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 71206, "completion_tokens": 1939, "reasoning_tokens": 490, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 13500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7bf7c73d4b75a016d70f0ddf.json", "detail_js": "details/7bf7c73d4b75a016d70f0ddf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7bf7c73d4b75a016d70f0ddf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1185025f73cb4def89c775896cf05958.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6b0eb2f38f924184a1662e81e2335f5d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5e31f56a2bcb48f68c46ce76", "question_id": "Q069", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing year-over-year revenue growth rates between NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs FY2024) and Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs FY2023), what was the difference in growth rates?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation grew its revenue by 114.20% (rising from $60,922M to $130,497M), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. grew its net sales by 10.99% (rising from $574,785M to $637,959M). NVIDIA's growth rate was 103.21 percentage points higher than Amazon's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the SEC filings retrieved:\n\n### **1. NVIDIA Corporation**\nFrom NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem: 0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), Consolidated Statements of Income:\n* **FY2025 Revenue** (Year ended Jan 26, 2025): **$130,497 million**\n* **FY2024 Revenue** (Year ended Jan 28, 2024): **$60,922 million**\n\n$$\\text{NVIDIA YoY Revenue Growth Rate} = \\frac{130,497 - 60,922}{60,922} = \\frac{69,575}{60,922} \\approx 114.2034\\% \\text{ (or } \\approx 114.20\\% \\text{; reported as } 114\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### **2. Amazon.com, Inc.**\nFrom Amazon.com, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0001018724-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), Item 7 (*Effect of Foreign Exchange Rates* table):\n* **FY2024 Net Sales (Revenue)** (As Reported): **$637,959 million**\n* **FY2023 Net Sales (Revenue)** (As Reported): **$574,785 million**\n\n$$\\text{Amazon YoY Revenue Growth Rate} = \\frac{637,959 - 574,785}{574,785} = \\frac{63,174}{574,785} \\approx 10.9909\\% \\text{ (or } \\approx 10.99\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### **3. Difference in Growth Rates**\n$$\\text{Difference} = 114.2034\\% - 10.9909\\% \\approx 103.2125\\% \\text{ (or } \\approx 103.21\\% \\text{ / } 103.2 \\text{ percentage points)}$$\n\n* (Or using rounded percentages: $114\\% - 11\\% = 103\\%$).", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 93, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every key figure: NVIDIA revenue $130,497M vs $60,922M (114.20% growth) and Amazon net sales $637,959M vs $574,785M (10.99% growth, computed as 10.9909%). Its difference of 103.21 percentage points matches the reference. The dates are correct (NVIDIA FY ended Jan 26, 2025 vs Jan 28, 2024; Amazon FY ended Dec 31, 2024), and the arithmetic checks out. The main deduction is that the candidate also offers a rounded 103% alternative, which is acceptable but slightly less precise. Citation support is strong: the NVIDIA values appear in the Consolidated Statements of Income read in the tool output, and the Amazon values appear in the Effect of Foreign Exchange Rates table (As Reported net sales). The candidate does not cite the Item 8 Statements of Operations row that the gold evidence uses, but the figures are supported by the tool output it did retrieve.", "known_cost_usd": 0.068048975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.064112475, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0039365, "wall_seconds": 40.548608979001074, "api_seconds": 38.995300643999144, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 5, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 129302, "completion_tokens": 2249, "reasoning_tokens": 754, "cache_read_tokens": 17443, "excerpt_characters": 60000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000034", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033450", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001104659-25-044138" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5e31f56a2bcb48f68c46ce76.json", "detail_js": "details/5e31f56a2bcb48f68c46ce76.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5e31f56a2bcb48f68c46ce76.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8e4ffeb762e34113a064bf40d7b22ecb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/90867b97f2634d03972047826bb9e86d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b1f39bedcb2a16f5657aa34f", "question_id": "Q069", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing year-over-year revenue growth rates between NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs FY2024) and Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs FY2023), what was the difference in growth rates?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation grew its revenue by 114.20% (rising from $60,922M to $130,497M), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. grew its net sales by 10.99% (rising from $574,785M to $637,959M). NVIDIA's growth rate was 103.21 percentage points higher than Amazon's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to calculate the difference in year-over-year revenue growth rates: it does not provide the revenue figures for the relevant fiscal years for both companies.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as answerable: NVIDIA revenue of $60,922M to $130,497M (114.20%) and Amazon net sales of $574,785M to $637,959M (10.99%), a difference of 103.21 points. The candidate abstains, claiming the revenue figures are unavailable. That abstention is not justified, since the reference shows the question is answerable, so correctness is low. The abstention is largely supported by the tool evidence, though: the NVIDIA search returned only an outlook reconciliation table and the Amazon search returned business-description text, neither containing the revenue figures. The retrieval was incomplete, not the data absent, so citation_support is fairly high but the candidate's conclusion is still wrong.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004300295, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002799895, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015004, "wall_seconds": 34.56294574799904, "api_seconds": 31.598401845003536, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 45950, "completion_tokens": 1746, "reasoning_tokens": 673, "cache_read_tokens": 17472, "excerpt_characters": 7400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001018724-25-000026", "0001018724-25-000028", "0001018724-25-000030", "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b1f39bedcb2a16f5657aa34f.json", "detail_js": "details/b1f39bedcb2a16f5657aa34f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b1f39bedcb2a16f5657aa34f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ac7048121f76423fa7eed07e53bf28b2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/161ae563381047c4970f8a847d1e9449.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e54b74234a9cdba836026089", "question_id": "Q069", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing year-over-year revenue growth rates between NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 vs FY2024) and Amazon.com, Inc. (FY2024 vs FY2023), what was the difference in growth rates?", "reference": "NVIDIA Corporation grew its revenue by 114.20% (rising from $60,922M to $130,497M), whereas Amazon.com, Inc. grew its net sales by 10.99% (rising from $574,785M to $637,959M). NVIDIA's growth rate was 103.21 percentage points higher than Amazon's.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t reliably calculate the difference from the returned evidence: it gives NVIDIA’s revenue growth as **114%**, but it does not provide Amazon’s FY2024-versus-FY2023 revenue growth rate. So the difference is undetermined from the evidence available.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as answerable: NVIDIA growth of 114.20% (from $60,922M to $130,497M), Amazon growth of 10.99% (from $574,785M to $637,959M), and a 103.21 percentage-point difference. I checked these: 130497/60922 gives about 114.20%, and 637959/574785 gives about 10.99%. The candidate abstained and gave no difference, so it does not match the reference's answer. Its abstention is not justified by the reference, since the question is answerable. Its citation support is strong: the NVIDIA 114% figure appears in the tool output ('Up 114%'), and the candidate correctly reports that the Amazon figures were never retrieved. The 'Tool budget exhausted' result and the failed needle searches support its statement that the evidence was insufficient. The Amazon net sales figures appear only in the gold evidence, not in any tool output the candidate received, so its statement that the evidence was missing is accurate for what it saw.", "known_cost_usd": 0.006122949999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00370265, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024203, "wall_seconds": 37.35855999899832, "api_seconds": 35.8818874139979, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 9, "tool_processed": 9, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 1, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 63786, "completion_tokens": 1968, "reasoning_tokens": 910, "cache_read_tokens": 20255, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000022", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001238", "0001959173-25-001264" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/e54b74234a9cdba836026089.json", "detail_js": "details/e54b74234a9cdba836026089.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e54b74234a9cdba836026089.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/eda8a1878f2c4bc2910be15417423fc6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9a038204e0b44e58b871b0ad6b3038f1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f32ae8e92bcd8adae54fbe52", "question_id": "Q070", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Citigroup Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which institution generated higher total net revenues, and by what dollar amount?", "reference": "Citigroup Inc. generated $81,139 million in total revenues net of interest expense, whereas The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. generated $53,512 million in total net revenues. Citigroup generated $27,627 million ($27.627 billion) more net revenue than Goldman Sachs in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filings and evidence:\n\n### 1. Citigroup Inc.\n- **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000831001-25-000067`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n- **Total Citigroup net revenues (2024):** **$81,139 million** ($81.139 billion).\n\n---\n\n### 2. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.\n- **Filing identified:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000886982-25-000005`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n- **Limitation:** Due to the exhaustion of the tool budget, the specific net revenues table from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Form 10-K could not be extracted. \n\n### Conclusion\nBecause the tool budget was exhausted before reading the revenue table in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s filing, there is **insufficient evidence** in the retrieved passages to calculate the exact dollar difference between the two institutions.", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Citigroup's 2024 net revenues were $81,139M and Goldman Sachs' were $53,512M, a difference of $27,627M. The candidate correctly reports Citigroup's $81,139M, which the tool output supports (Total Citigroup net revenues row, 2024 column). It never retrieves Goldman Sachs' revenue, so it omits the core comparison: which institution is higher and by how much. Its abstention is unjustified because the gold evidence was obtainable, and the claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not visible in the tool outputs. The Goldman Sachs filing identification (accession 0000886982-25-000005) is supported by the transcript. Citation support is moderate: the Citi figure and filing identifiers are backed by tool evidence, but the budget-exhaustion claim is not.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04092635, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03944325, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014831, "wall_seconds": 34.65066501399997, "api_seconds": 32.07751197400103, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59262, "completion_tokens": 1632, "reasoning_tokens": 346, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000769993-25-000253", "0000769993-25-000301", "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000886982-25-000009", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-042819", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-013544", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-054559" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f32ae8e92bcd8adae54fbe52.json", "detail_js": "details/f32ae8e92bcd8adae54fbe52.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f32ae8e92bcd8adae54fbe52.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/097ef0acb05948aeab739170b9976500.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8f6b3e4f75c042a2b31af2320cd70e69.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ea01f59430c781303b6908e4", "question_id": "Q070", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Citigroup Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which institution generated higher total net revenues, and by what dollar amount?", "reference": "Citigroup Inc. generated $81,139 million in total revenues net of interest expense, whereas The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. generated $53,512 million in total net revenues. Citigroup generated $27,627 million ($27.627 billion) more net revenue than Goldman Sachs in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filings and evidence within the available tool budget:\n\n1. **The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.**'s 2024 Form 10-K was identified (`file_stem`: `0000886982-25-000005` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n2. **Citigroup Inc.**'s 2024 Form 10-K was identified (`file_stem`: `0000831001-25-000067` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n\nHowever, because the tool budget was exhausted before extracting the specific income statement line items reporting total net revenues for fiscal year 2024 from both filings, the available retrieved evidence is **insufficient** to determine which institution generated higher total net revenues and the exact dollar amount of the difference.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 35, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Citigroup's 2024 revenues net of interest expense were $81,139M and Goldman Sachs' total net revenues were $53,512M, a difference of $27,627M. The candidate abstains, saying the evidence is insufficient, and gives no figures, so it fails to answer an answerable question and earns little correctness credit. Its claim that the two 2024 10-K filings were identified is supported by the tool output (accessions 0000831001-25-000067 and 0000886982-25-000005 appear in sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the Goldman filing's period and form are confirmed in the read_filing text). However, its statement that the tool budget was exhausted is not shown in the tool evidence, and it does not cite the income statement or revenue lines that were retrieved, such as the Goldman 'Total non-interest revenues' search hit. Citation support is therefore partial.", "known_cost_usd": 0.051781175, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.049515975000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022652, "wall_seconds": 37.2717107619992, "api_seconds": 34.847037654002634, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 106856, "completion_tokens": 1539, "reasoning_tokens": 389, "cache_read_tokens": 28753, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-042819", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-054559" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ea01f59430c781303b6908e4.json", "detail_js": "details/ea01f59430c781303b6908e4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ea01f59430c781303b6908e4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7fac23a38237429da5cbcfd1e348caa7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f6263bfed2bc47408d0ed312958e2669.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c41f7c08a1aeec8ad6761e4e", "question_id": "Q070", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Citigroup Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which institution generated higher total net revenues, and by what dollar amount?", "reference": "Citigroup Inc. generated $81,139 million in total revenues net of interest expense, whereas The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. generated $53,512 million in total net revenues. Citigroup generated $27,627 million ($27.627 billion) more net revenue than Goldman Sachs in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to establish which institution generated higher total net revenues or the dollar difference. The Citigroup filing excerpt does not show its 2024 revenue amount, and the Goldman Sachs excerpt does not show its amount either.", "correctness": 8, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Citigroup's 2024 revenues net of interest expense were $81,139M and Goldman's total net revenues were $53,512M, a $27,627M difference. The candidate abstains, which earns little credit because the question has a definite answer and the gold evidence supports it. The candidate's narrower claim is accurate to the tool outputs: the Citigroup excerpt is a ratio table without the revenue line, and the Goldman excerpt is MD&A prose without the $53,512M figure. The tool results never surfaced the gold table rows, and the candidate did not mention the duplicate-ID error or the failed '81,101' search, but its description of what the retrieved text does and does not show is faithful.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004017595, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002692495, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013251, "wall_seconds": 39.99333512299927, "api_seconds": 37.32969464100643, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48229, "completion_tokens": 1759, "reasoning_tokens": 728, "cache_read_tokens": 22857, "excerpt_characters": 1900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000769993-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005", "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001557", "0000950103-25-001733", "0000950103-25-001783", "0000950103-25-001858", "0000950103-25-001886", "0000950103-25-001978", "0000950103-25-002065", "0000950103-25-002107", "0000950103-25-002155", "0000950103-25-002302", "0000950103-25-002500", "0000950103-25-002592", "0000950170-25-000317", "0000950170-25-003529", "0000950170-25-006537", "0000950170-25-007184", "0000950170-25-007362", "0000950170-25-008148", "0000950170-25-011174", "0000950170-25-021504", "0000950170-25-021506", "0000950170-25-035424", "0000950170-25-042573", "0000950170-25-042819", "0001193125-25-013544", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025100", "0001193125-25-025313", "0001193125-25-026104", "0001193125-25-027378", "0001193125-25-027379", "0001193125-25-036768", "0001193125-25-036777", "0001193125-25-036786", "0001193125-25-054559", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c41f7c08a1aeec8ad6761e4e.json", "detail_js": "details/c41f7c08a1aeec8ad6761e4e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c41f7c08a1aeec8ad6761e4e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b23f56f70f4d475da1e54f7f8efeb5b8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e34707a98e4443d3bbf6303e61ce5fcc.request.json" }, { "task_id": "88194dc15a115107c096b142", "question_id": "Q070", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Citigroup Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which institution generated higher total net revenues, and by what dollar amount?", "reference": "Citigroup Inc. generated $81,139 million in total revenues net of interest expense, whereas The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. generated $53,512 million in total net revenues. Citigroup generated $27,627 million ($27.627 billion) more net revenue than Goldman Sachs in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t substantiate the comparison from the retrieved records. I confirmed the issuer CIKs in the metadata, but did not identify and read the two fiscal-year 2024 filings, so I can’t reliably state which had higher total net revenues or the dollar difference.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Citigroup's 2024 revenues net of interest expense as $81,139M and Goldman Sachs' total net revenues as $53,512M, a $27,627M difference. The candidate abstained and gave no figures or winner, so it misses the required answer. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which this one is not. The candidate's account of its process is supported by the tool outputs: the searches for both companies' 10-K filings in the 2025-02 and 2025-03 files returned no rows, and no filing text was read. The phrase 'confirmed the issuer CIKs in the metadata' is only loosely supported, since the tool outputs show accession matches, not explicit CIK confirmation. The tool evidence does not contain the reference figures, so it cannot support the answer itself.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00249253, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00142703, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010655, "wall_seconds": 34.89336483599982, "api_seconds": 32.457424137001, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35253, "completion_tokens": 1497, "reasoning_tokens": 675, "cache_read_tokens": 21398, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067", "0000886982-25-000005" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001749", "0000950103-25-001842", "0000950103-25-001854", "0000950103-25-002005", "0000950103-25-002449", "0000950103-25-002660", "0000950103-25-002734", "0000950170-25-022366", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329", "0001918704-25-001816", "0001918704-25-001867", "0001918704-25-002238", "0001918704-25-002260", "0001918704-25-002261", "0001918704-25-002543", "0001918704-25-002859", "0001918704-25-002939", "0001918704-25-003062", "0001918704-25-003273", "0001918704-25-003295", "0001918704-25-003411" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/88194dc15a115107c096b142.json", "detail_js": "details/88194dc15a115107c096b142.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/88194dc15a115107c096b142.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b34a83f3b22e4764b4b4de040f2dfb07.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/82577496eb484e348503687c730f225c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "376a1ca3e286eaa21597afcf", "question_id": "Q071", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing energy giants Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Total revenues and other income between them?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $56,953 million for ConocoPhillips. Marathon Petroleum generated $83,459 million ($83.459 billion) more in total revenues and other income than ConocoPhillips.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings located within the tool budget:\n\n- **Marathon Petroleum Corporation** (CIK `0001510295`, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, `file_stem: 0001510295-25-000012` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) and **ConocoPhillips** (CIK `0001163165`, Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, `file_stem: 0001163165-25-000012` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) were identified.\n- However, before the specific Consolidated Statements of Income rows for fiscal year 2024 \"Total revenues and other income\" could be extracted and read from both filings, the query tool budget was exhausted.\n\nTherefore, the returned evidence is **insufficient** to compute the exact difference between the two companies' Total revenues and other income for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: $140,412M minus $56,953M gives $83,459M. The candidate gives no figures and abstains, claiming the tool budget was exhausted. The question is answerable, so abstention earns little credit. The candidate's identification of both filings (CIKs, accession numbers, file_stem, sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, FY ending 2024-12-31) is supported by the tool output. The claim that the budget was exhausted is not shown anywhere in the tool evidence, which ends with successful queries. The tool evidence also does not contain the figures the candidate needed, so the 'insufficient' conclusion is not clearly supported by what was retrieved, even though the candidate's broader search was incomplete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04662865, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04487025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017584, "wall_seconds": 35.385262092999255, "api_seconds": 32.437536954999814, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 68066, "completion_tokens": 1869, "reasoning_tokens": 352, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-046132", "0001104659-25-049824", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001163165-25-000023", "0001163165-25-000025", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000310", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025", "0001510295-25-000039" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/376a1ca3e286eaa21597afcf.json", "detail_js": "details/376a1ca3e286eaa21597afcf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/376a1ca3e286eaa21597afcf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0c8f5090508b400c871293de1200c9ee.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b184d0b16ad84d2eb53c2b317477ebf3.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4aaf71ef429d27bde31ab8f1", "question_id": "Q071", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing energy giants Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Total revenues and other income between them?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $56,953 million for ConocoPhillips. Marathon Petroleum generated $83,459 million ($83.459 billion) more in total revenues and other income than ConocoPhillips.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the provided search and query results within the tool budget:\n\n1. **ConocoPhillips**:\n - Filing: ConocoPhillips 2024 Form 10-K (`file_stem`: `0001163165-25-000012` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n - The filing contains the line item `\"Total Revenues and Other Income\"` (located around character offset 310,831).\n\n2. **Marathon Petroleum Corporation**:\n - Marathon Petroleum Corporation filings were identified under CIK `0001510281` across several filings in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`.\n - However, before Marathon Petroleum Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K and its specific `\"Total revenues and other income\"` value could be retrieved and inspected, the tool budget was exhausted.\n\n**Conclusion:**\nThe evidence retrieved within the tool budget is **insufficient** to compute the difference in Total revenues and other income between Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 65, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Marathon Petroleum's 2024 total revenues and other income of $140,412M minus ConocoPhillips' $56,953M gives a $83,459M difference. The candidate gives no figures and concludes the evidence is insufficient, so it is effectively a wrong answer rather than a justified abstention. Its cited facts are mostly supported by the tool output: the ConocoPhillips filing 0001163165-25-000012 contains the 'Total Revenues and Other Income' line at offset 310,831, and Marathon's CIK filings appear in the 2025-01 file. However, the tool output never shows the Marathon 2024 10-K being absent or the budget being exhausted, and the gold-evidence Marathon row (0001510295-25-000012) was never retrieved, so the candidate's account of the search is only partly supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03146935, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03027525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011941, "wall_seconds": 33.9928136489998, "api_seconds": 32.67467229799877, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 43948, "completion_tokens": 1672, "reasoning_tokens": 405, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000042888-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000902664-25-000467", "0000902664-25-000615", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001062993-25-000029", "0001062993-25-000262", "0001062993-25-000739", "0001062993-25-000842", "0001062993-25-000932", "0001062993-25-000944", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001510281-25-000001", "0001510281-25-000007", "0001510281-25-000016", "0001510281-25-000022", "0001510281-25-000031", "0001510281-25-000033", "0001510281-25-000034", "0001510281-25-000037", "0001510281-25-000049", "0001510281-25-000053", "0001510281-25-000056", "0001510281-25-000058" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/4aaf71ef429d27bde31ab8f1.json", "detail_js": "details/4aaf71ef429d27bde31ab8f1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4aaf71ef429d27bde31ab8f1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9d315781cc4849298cb5f64060080f5e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/493b8d34dadf419f95fcc3ea7fa4c336.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e52aeeef49443af1432ba401", "question_id": "Q071", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing energy giants Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Total revenues and other income between them?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $56,953 million for ConocoPhillips. Marathon Petroleum generated $83,459 million ($83.459 billion) more in total revenues and other income than ConocoPhillips.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum reported **$140,412 million** in “Total revenues and other income” for 2024; ConocoPhillips reported **$56,953 million**. Marathon’s figure was higher by **$83,459 million ($83.459 billion)**.\n\nEvidence: Marathon Petroleum Corporation, FY2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001510295-25-000012`, “Total revenues and other income” table near character offset 249,765; ConocoPhillips FY2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001163165-25-000012`, corresponding table near offset 310,831. Both figures are in millions. **Calculation:** 140,412 − 56,953 = 83,459.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: Marathon Petroleum $140,412M, ConocoPhillips $56,953M, and a difference of $83,459M ($83.459B). The arithmetic is correct. The tool outputs support both numbers and the cited character offsets (249,765 and 310,831) for the two file stems. Citation support is slightly reduced because the tool evidence does not explicitly show the form type (FY2024 Form 10-K) or the 'in millions' unit label, which the candidate asserts.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002613045, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001484145, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011289, "wall_seconds": 31.042873954998868, "api_seconds": 28.782784999002615, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32421, "completion_tokens": 1427, "reasoning_tokens": 505, "cache_read_tokens": 16687, "excerpt_characters": 1650, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000006", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001308179-25-000155", "0001308179-25-000308", "0001308179-25-000310", "0001510295-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000016", "0001510295-25-000023", "0001510295-25-000025" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/e52aeeef49443af1432ba401.json", "detail_js": "details/e52aeeef49443af1432ba401.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e52aeeef49443af1432ba401.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4dc8603f50734b4ca1a447e938e7d861.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b30af52d2cd04ae897809fb2b99079b0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "38fd90fe4f62351ee64451ae", "question_id": "Q071", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing energy giants Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in Total revenues and other income between them?", "reference": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported Total revenues and other income of $140,412 million in 2024, compared to $56,953 million for ConocoPhillips. Marathon Petroleum generated $83,459 million ($83.459 billion) more in total revenues and other income than ConocoPhillips.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Marathon Petroleum reported **$140,412 million** in total revenues and other income for fiscal 2024; ConocoPhillips reported **$56,953 million**. The difference was **$83,459 million**, with Marathon Petroleum higher.\n\nSources: Marathon Petroleum 2024 filing, `0001510295-25-000005` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, chars 24,514–36,514 (statement labels figures in millions); ConocoPhillips 2024 Form 10-K, `0001163165-25-000012` in the same file, chars 309,830–321,830 (millions of dollars). Calculation: $140,412 million − $56,953 million = **$83,459 million**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference: Marathon Petroleum $140,412M, ConocoPhillips $56,953M, and a difference of $83,459M, with correct units and direction. The ConocoPhillips citation (0001163165-25-000012, chars 309,830–321,830) matches the read_filing output showing the $56,953 total. The Marathon citation uses accession 0001510295-25-000005 rather than the gold's -000012. The tool output does show the 140412 figure in the -000005 document at chars 24,514–36,514, so the citation is supported, though it differs from the gold evidence. The arithmetic is correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00510942, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00261702, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024924, "wall_seconds": 37.25838111499979, "api_seconds": 35.237206975001754, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 59257, "completion_tokens": 1451, "reasoning_tokens": 558, "cache_read_tokens": 21327, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001163165-25-000012", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000318", "0000950170-25-000339", "0000950170-25-001660", "0000950170-25-001663", "0000950170-25-001667", "0000950170-25-001675", "0000950170-25-001690", "0000950170-25-001693", "0000950170-25-006626", "0000950170-25-006634", "0000950170-25-006641", "0000950170-25-006645", "0000950170-25-006649", "0000950170-25-006657", "0000950170-25-006663", "0000950170-25-006669", "0000950170-25-006679", "0000950170-25-006681", "0000950170-25-010605", "0000950170-25-012974", "0000950170-25-017601", "0000950170-25-017692", "0000950170-25-017717", "0000950170-25-017752", "0000950170-25-017772", "0000950170-25-017806", "0000950170-25-017810", "0000950170-25-017814", "0000950170-25-018069", "0000950170-25-018114", "0000950170-25-019409", "0000950170-25-019411", "0000950170-25-019415", "0000950170-25-019417", "0000950170-25-019424", "0000950170-25-019431", "0000950170-25-019448", "0000950170-25-019453", "0001104659-25-006571", "0001163165-25-000012", "0001193125-25-021401", "0001193125-25-021887", "0001193125-25-022740", "0001193125-25-023281", "0001510295-25-000005", "0001510295-25-000012" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/38fd90fe4f62351ee64451ae.json", "detail_js": "details/38fd90fe4f62351ee64451ae.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/38fd90fe4f62351ee64451ae.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e1494dc7d7a54372aadd837bbd163428.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6e4b9ae71a82436bb5ac05fa7ede6671.request.json" }, { "task_id": "20a15e8bd9bbc7956b9ea239", "question_id": "Q072", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which software/information provider achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. achieved an operating margin of 31.35% ($6,741 million operating income on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding Morningstar, Inc.'s operating margin of 21.30% ($484.8 million operating income on $2,275.1 million revenue) by 10.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved SEC filings for fiscal year 2024:\n\n### 1. Adobe Inc. (Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024)\n- **File Stem**: `0000796343-25-000004` (Parquet file: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`)\n- **From the Consolidated Statements of Income** (in millions):\n - **Total Revenue**: $21,505 million\n - **Operating Income**: $6,741 million\n- **Operating Margin Percentage**:\n $$\\frac{\\$6,741}{\\$21,505} \\times 100\\% \\approx 31.346\\% \\quad (\\text{or } 31.35\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### 2. Morningstar, Inc. (Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024)\n- **File Stem**: `0001289419-25-000041` (Parquet file: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`)\n- **Limitation**: While Morningstar's Form 10-K filing was located and confirmed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the tool budget was exhausted before retrieving Morningstar's Consolidated Statements of Income (specifically its fiscal year 2024 total revenue and operating income).\n\n---\n\n### Conclusion\nBecause the tool budget was exhausted before retrieving Morningstar's full operating income and revenue numbers from its Consolidated Statements of Income, the available evidence is **insufficient** to compute Morningstar's exact operating margin percentage and calculate the exact percentage point difference between the two companies.", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The Adobe figures are correct and match the tool output: revenue $21,505M, operating income $6,741M, margin about 31.35%, and the filing stem and fiscal year end are supported. The answer fails on the core question. The reference is answerable, since the Morningstar 10-K (0001289419-25-000041) was retrieved and the gold evidence shows a 21.3% operating margin in its MD&A. The candidate abstained, so there is no Morningstar margin and no percentage-point difference, and it did not read the MD&A metrics table. Its claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not supported by any tool output shown, which contains no budget-exhaustion message. The Morningstar filing identification is supported, but the abstention is not justified, so the answer is mostly unanswered.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05499485, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05294625, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0020486, "wall_seconds": 45.88868646299852, "api_seconds": 43.122181124001145, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 81371, "completion_tokens": 1942, "reasoning_tokens": 447, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 17000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001289419-25-000070", "0001289419-25-000073", "0001289419-25-000080", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/20a15e8bd9bbc7956b9ea239.json", "detail_js": "details/20a15e8bd9bbc7956b9ea239.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/20a15e8bd9bbc7956b9ea239.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/da38753368794ade8008adf3cd4e3e6a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/304dc552c31040d08a25d07891cffd3d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "86aaff29bd6e4ae92765345c", "question_id": "Q072", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which software/information provider achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. achieved an operating margin of 31.35% ($6,741 million operating income on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding Morningstar, Inc.'s operating margin of 21.30% ($484.8 million operating income on $2,275.1 million revenue) by 10.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved within the available tool budget:\n\n1. **Adobe Inc. (CIK: 0000796343)**: \n - Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 was located under filing accession number / `file_stem`: `0000796343-25-000004` (in file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`).\n2. **Morningstar, Inc. (CIK: 0001289419)**: \n - Morningstar, Inc.'s candidate Form 10-K filing was identified under filing accession number / `file_stem`: `0001289419-25-000041` (in file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n\n### Limitation / Insufficiency of Evidence:\nBecause the tool execution budget was exhausted before reading the consolidated statements of operations (operating income and total revenue) for fiscal year 2024 for both Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc., there is **insufficient evidence** in the retrieved records to compute the operating margin percentages or determine by how many percentage points one exceeds the other.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: Adobe's FY2024 operating margin is about 31.35% (6,741 / 21,505) and Morningstar's is about 21.3%, a gap of about 10 percentage points. The candidate abstained and gave no margin figures or comparison, so it misses the core answer. Its abstention is not justified by the evidence, since the question is answerable. The candidate's identification of the Adobe 10-K (accession 0000796343-25-000004, fiscal year ended November 29, 2024) is supported by the header output. Its identification of the Morningstar accession (0001289419-25-000041) is only partly supported, because the tool output lists that file stem with a large character count but does not confirm the form type as 10-K. The candidate also says the tool budget was exhausted, which the tool outputs do not explicitly show. Its claim that the income statement data was never read is accurate, so the abstention itself is transparent about what was not retrieved.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0402684, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0386355, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016329, "wall_seconds": 38.50191653100046, "api_seconds": 37.034598578999066, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59698, "completion_tokens": 1629, "reasoning_tokens": 495, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001104659-25-012209", "0001104659-25-027796", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-007426", "0001193125-25-008403", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001193125-25-010350", "0001193125-25-050463", "0001193125-25-051929", "0001193125-25-051942", "0001193125-25-057808", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000003", "0001289419-25-000005", "0001289419-25-000007", "0001289419-25-000009", "0001289419-25-000011", "0001289419-25-000013", "0001289419-25-000015", "0001289419-25-000017", "0001289419-25-000019", "0001289419-25-000022", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000027", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000043", "0001289419-25-000053", "0001289419-25-000058", "0001628280-25-007741", "0001628280-25-009060", "0001628280-25-015917", "0001628280-25-015972", "0001921094-25-000092" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/86aaff29bd6e4ae92765345c.json", "detail_js": "details/86aaff29bd6e4ae92765345c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/86aaff29bd6e4ae92765345c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/642dea2cf6d24173a63a2445ef9e7530.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f79160294bf34aaf996f70dd2a39f6a4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6fbdf0c834d50d2b72c63a8b", "question_id": "Q072", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which software/information provider achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. achieved an operating margin of 31.35% ($6,741 million operating income on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding Morningstar, Inc.'s operating margin of 21.30% ($484.8 million operating income on $2,275.1 million revenue) by 10.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence confirms that the Morningstar filing is its 2024 Form 10-K and identifies Adobe filings, but it does not provide Adobe’s fiscal-2024 operating income and revenue or the comparable Morningstar figures needed to calculate and compare operating margins. I can’t determine which margin was higher or by how many percentage points from the available evidence.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the corpus: Adobe's FY2024 operating income of $6,741M and Morningstar's 21.3% operating margin appear in the gold evidence. The candidate abstained, and the rubric gives full correctness for abstention only when the reference is unanswerable, so it earns no correctness credit. Its abstention is partly understandable because the retrieved tool output never reached Adobe's FY2024 10-K income statement (accession 0000796343-25-000004) and shows only a Q1 FY2025 10-Q quarterly figure and a DEF 14A header. Its claims are largely supported by that tool output: the Adobe full-year income and revenue figures and the Morningstar operating-margin table are absent from what was returned. It does not cite the 21.3% margin or the 6,741 figure, which were available in the gold evidence but not in the tool output the candidate relied on.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004559165, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002811765, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017474, "wall_seconds": 49.0848780489996, "api_seconds": 46.52680593899822, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 51302, "completion_tokens": 2273, "reasoning_tokens": 1110, "cache_read_tokens": 23314, "excerpt_characters": 7600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000038", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000025", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001289419-25-000070", "0001289419-25-000073", "0001289419-25-000080", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6fbdf0c834d50d2b72c63a8b.json", "detail_js": "details/6fbdf0c834d50d2b72c63a8b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6fbdf0c834d50d2b72c63a8b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2e15cc703a7b4d81a6db8a6744573ccb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d43ba2e469544652ac208de04dd24c7a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3cd58ee35d71ccf020e3e57a", "question_id": "Q072", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. and Morningstar, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, which software/information provider achieved a higher operating margin percentage, and by how many percentage points?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. achieved an operating margin of 31.35% ($6,741 million operating income on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding Morningstar, Inc.'s operating margin of 21.30% ($484.8 million operating income on $2,275.1 million revenue) by 10.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Morningstar achieved the higher 2024 operating margin: **21.3%**, versus Adobe’s reported **$6.74 billion** in GAAP operating income. The evidence returned does not include Adobe’s 2024 revenue or operating margin, so I can’t calculate the percentage-point difference or confirm which margin was higher.", "correctness": 8, "citation_support": 35, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's central claim is that Morningstar had the higher 2024 operating margin. The reference gives Adobe 31.35% versus Morningstar 21.3%, so the direction is wrong. The candidate's own tool evidence does not include Adobe's revenue or margin, so it had no basis for ranking the two companies, yet it still asserted a winner. The Morningstar figure (21.3%, operating income $484.8M, 2024) and Adobe's GAAP operating income ($6.74B) are supported by the retrieved text. The candidate correctly flagged that it could not compute the percentage-point gap, but that abstention does not offset the incorrect comparative conclusion. Citation support is limited because the key ranking claim is not backed by the returned evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00812551, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00496631, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0031592, "wall_seconds": 41.99550586999976, "api_seconds": 39.55275042900212, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 84676, "completion_tokens": 1606, "reasoning_tokens": 635, "cache_read_tokens": 22006, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001289419-25-000041" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000038", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001193125-25-067151", "0001289419-25-000041", "0001289419-25-000062", "0001289419-25-000073", "0001628280-25-019665", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3cd58ee35d71ccf020e3e57a.json", "detail_js": "details/3cd58ee35d71ccf020e3e57a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3cd58ee35d71ccf020e3e57a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/06806fba0b664239b4db29f07b85bc4a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/da6cd64d879a4f678e27df748c322fb4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3795af85e06b52207917252e", "question_id": "Q073", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation in 2024, what was the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation generated $27,673 million in net cash provided by operating activities in 2024, compared to $835 million for Whirlpool Corporation, a difference of $26,838 million ($26.838 billion) in favor of Comcast.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected within the allocated tool budget:\n\n1. **Whirlpool Corporation** (`CIK 0000106640`): The 2024 Form 10-K filing (`file_stem: 0000106640-25-000011`) was identified in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, but the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows could not be retrieved before exhausting the tool budget.\n2. **Comcast Corporation** (`CIK 0001166691`): The 2024 Form 10-K filing (`file_stem: 0001166691-25-000011`) was identified and partially read, but the specific Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows table showing the exact 2024 \"Net cash provided by operating activities\" figure was not reached before the tool budget was exhausted.\n\nTherefore, the available evidence returned is **insufficient** to compute the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities between Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation for 2024.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the gold evidence: Comcast's 2024 net cash from operations is $27,673M and Whirlpool's is $835M, a difference of $26,838M. The candidate abstained and gave no figures, so it is not correct. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. Its citation support is moderately good. The tool outputs do confirm the Whirlpool 10-K (0000106640-25-000011) in sfd-v1-2025-02 and the Comcast 10-K (0001166691-25-000011) in sfd-v1-2025-01. They also show the cash-flow statement was located but never read, which matches the candidate's description. The claim about exhausting the tool budget is not visible in the evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05830515, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05649075, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018144, "wall_seconds": 40.333160006999606, "api_seconds": 37.30089013799443, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 84330, "completion_tokens": 1827, "reasoning_tokens": 421, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 8500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000017843-25-000003", "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000075", "0000905148-25-000084", "0000929638-25-000019", "0000929638-25-000042", "0001041803-25-000007", "0001065088-25-000005", "0001065088-25-000012", "0001065088-25-000014", "0001104659-25-006356", "0001104659-25-006364", "0001133228-25-000579", "0001145549-25-001036", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000021", "0001193125-25-006815", "0001193125-25-012274", "0001193125-25-012347", "0001193125-25-013459", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001193125-25-137449", "0001193125-25-138510", "0001193125-25-139153", "0001213900-25-003044", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001308179-25-000504", "0001421224-25-000001", "0001539497-25-000085", "0001683168-25-000285", "0001683863-25-000087", "0001888524-25-000704", "0001888524-25-001258", "0001950047-25-000294", "0001958244-25-000004", "0001999371-25-000470" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3795af85e06b52207917252e.json", "detail_js": "details/3795af85e06b52207917252e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3795af85e06b52207917252e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/07e443909e8744279eed9f50376de78c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/45aef25ce09a4aa39d6de33482ff5ed1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0c237d26e590f08cc4c3f3bb", "question_id": "Q073", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation in 2024, what was the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation generated $27,673 million in net cash provided by operating activities in 2024, compared to $835 million for Whirlpool Corporation, a difference of $26,838 million ($26.838 billion) in favor of Comcast.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the 2024 Annual Reports (Form 10-K) for both companies:\n\n### **1. Comcast Corporation**\n* **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0001166691-25-000011`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`)\n* **Net cash provided by operating activities (2024):** **$27,673 million** (or **$27.7 billion**)\n\n---\n\n### **2. Whirlpool Corporation**\n* **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0000106640-25-000011`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`)\n* **Cash provided by operating activities (2024):** **$835 million**\n\n---\n\n### **Difference**\n$$\\$27,673\\text{ million} - \\$835\\text{ million} = \\$26,838\\text{ million}$$\n\nComcast Corporation’s net cash provided by operating activities exceeded Whirlpool Corporation’s by **$26,838 million** (or approximately **$26.838 billion**).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every figure: Comcast $27,673M, Whirlpool $835M, and a difference of $26,838M (about $26.838B) in Comcast's favor. The arithmetic and units are correct, and the answer is complete. Citation support is strong. The Comcast figure of 27,673 appears in the read_filing output from the 0001166691-25-000011 filing, and the Whirlpool $835 million figure appears in the MD&A text from 0000106640-25-000011. The file_stem and file_id values match the tool outputs. The candidate did not read the Whirlpool cash flow statement itself, and it cites the MD&A text, so the score is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05569385, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05357475, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0021191, "wall_seconds": 32.948153351000656, "api_seconds": 31.25796304299911, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 85109, "completion_tokens": 1503, "reasoning_tokens": 320, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 26500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000072", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001096906-25-000908", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000018", "0001166691-25-000021", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-113873", "0001193125-25-115996", "0001193125-25-137449", "0001193125-25-138510", "0001193125-25-139153", "0001308179-25-000504" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0c237d26e590f08cc4c3f3bb.json", "detail_js": "details/0c237d26e590f08cc4c3f3bb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0c237d26e590f08cc4c3f3bb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6e15af4237dc4e4db5dab44eb5eb4116.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a4000aeb12484985b5243378233d70ad.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0e5a248ee0e7c6337278b297", "question_id": "Q073", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation in 2024, what was the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation generated $27,673 million in net cash provided by operating activities in 2024, compared to $835 million for Whirlpool Corporation, a difference of $26,838 million ($26.838 billion) in favor of Comcast.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the difference from the returned evidence. It does not show either company’s 2024 net cash provided by operating activities figure.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence shows Comcast at $27,673M and Whirlpool at $835M for 2024 operating cash flow, giving a $26,838M difference. The candidate abstained, and since the question is answerable, abstention does not count as correct, so correctness is 0. For citation support, the candidate's statement that the returned tool evidence does not show either 2024 figure is accurate. The tool outputs contain only truncated passages and the Whirlpool search hit landed on a signature page, so the claim is well supported, though it is not a substitute for a correct answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00386412, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0025486199999999997, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013155, "wall_seconds": 33.36288230500031, "api_seconds": 31.233376383001087, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 37083, "completion_tokens": 1744, "reasoning_tokens": 691, "cache_read_tokens": 11977, "excerpt_characters": 1700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0000950103-25-003639", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549", "0001225208-25-002844", "0001225208-25-002845" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0e5a248ee0e7c6337278b297.json", "detail_js": "details/0e5a248ee0e7c6337278b297.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0e5a248ee0e7c6337278b297.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c8fddcc70fcb4e15a81496f180c81ba0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dacc3210680442af930423e68fc63397.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d335e32110e69a5b9bf1473c", "question_id": "Q073", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Comcast Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation in 2024, what was the difference in Net cash provided by operating activities?", "reference": "Comcast Corporation generated $27,673 million in net cash provided by operating activities in 2024, compared to $835 million for Whirlpool Corporation, a difference of $26,838 million ($26.838 billion) in favor of Comcast.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the difference from the returned evidence: it gives Comcast’s 2024 net cash provided by operating activities as **$27.673 billion**, but does not provide Whirlpool’s 2024 figure.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Comcast's 2024 operating cash flow is $27,673M and Whirlpool's is $835M, a difference of $26,838M. The candidate abstained and computed no difference, so it fails the core task. Abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. Its Comcast figure ($27.673 billion) matches the tool-returned Comcast table. Its statement that Whirlpool's figure is absent is accurate for the tool evidence: the read_filing call on 0000106640-25-000011 returned found:false, and the Whirlpool $835 figure appears only in the gold evidence, not the tool outputs. The candidate is transparent about the gap, but the gap was in its retrieval, not the evidence, so the abstention is only partly justified.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0051592750000000005, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0033074750000000003, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018518, "wall_seconds": 37.128452660999756, "api_seconds": 35.39124082200033, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 62226, "completion_tokens": 1580, "reasoning_tokens": 677, "cache_read_tokens": 26285, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000011", "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000106640-25-000006", "0000106640-25-000011", "0000106640-25-000014", "0000106640-25-000017", "0000106640-25-000020", "0000106640-25-000022", "0000106640-25-000024", "0000106640-25-000026", "0000106640-25-000027", "0000106640-25-000029", "0000106640-25-000030", "0000106640-25-000032", "0000106640-25-000034", "0000106640-25-000036", "0000106640-25-000049", "0000106640-25-000075", "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-047168", "0001193125-25-047181", "0001193125-25-047194", "0001193125-25-047938" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d335e32110e69a5b9bf1473c.json", "detail_js": "details/d335e32110e69a5b9bf1473c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d335e32110e69a5b9bf1473c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6add0f8bc5d54b2299d6739ab828314b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bb359eb7aae0454bb9293c7b508167f1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "44b13a21cd4b4cf7f28bffa3", "question_id": "Q074", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which technology firm recorded a higher gross profit margin percentage, and what was the percentage point difference?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. recorded a gross profit margin of 89.04% ($19,147 million gross profit on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin of 74.99% (reported 75.0%) ($97,858 million on $130,497 million revenue) by 14.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected within the allocated tool budget:\n\n### 1. Adobe Inc. (FY2024)\nFrom Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), **Consolidated Statements of Income**:\n* **Total revenue:** $21,505 million\n* **Total cost of revenue:** $2,358 million\n* **Gross profit:** $19,147 million\n\n$$\\text{Gross Profit Margin} = \\frac{\\$19,147}{\\$21,505} \\times 100\\% \\approx 89.0351\\% \\quad (89.04\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### 2. NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025)\n* While NVIDIA's relevant annual report filing (`0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified in the metadata lookup, the tool budget was exhausted before reading the consolidated statements of income from NVIDIA's filing.\n\n---\n\n### Limitation Notice\nDue to the exhaustion of the tool budget, the financial statements for **NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025)** could not be retrieved from the parquet files. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in the retrieved text to compare the two gross profit margins or compute the exact percentage point difference.", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Adobe's gross margin is 89.04%, NVIDIA's is about 74.99%, and the gap is about 14.05 percentage points. The candidate correctly computed Adobe's figures (revenue 21,505, gross profit 19,147, margin about 89.04%), and these match the income statement in the tool output. However, it never retrieved NVIDIA's income statement, so it did not answer the comparison or the percentage-point difference, which are the core of the question. Its abstention is honest but not warranted, since the data was retrievable through the same file (the NVIDIA accession 0001045810-25-000023 was located in the tool output). Citation support is high because every claim the candidate makes, including the Adobe figures, the fiscal year end, the accession numbers, and the statement that NVIDIA's filing was identified but not read, is backed by the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0440346, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.042405, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016296, "wall_seconds": 36.450337604001106, "api_seconds": 34.4989193670026, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 63811, "completion_tokens": 1805, "reasoning_tokens": 327, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000115", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/44b13a21cd4b4cf7f28bffa3.json", "detail_js": "details/44b13a21cd4b4cf7f28bffa3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/44b13a21cd4b4cf7f28bffa3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ce28731e9e374b94b8be3beefd8ede4d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9d9d45fcdde2459faf9ffb5f040dfbe7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6f6e3589fb0fedd3184f9272", "question_id": "Q074", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which technology firm recorded a higher gross profit margin percentage, and what was the percentage point difference?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. recorded a gross profit margin of 89.04% ($19,147 million gross profit on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin of 74.99% (reported 75.0%) ($97,858 million on $130,497 million revenue) by 14.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the Consolidated Statements of Income from each company's respective Form 10-K:\n\n---\n\n### **1. Adobe Inc. (FY2024 ended November 29, 2024)**\n* **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`)\n* **Total Revenue:** $21,505 million\n* **Total Cost of Revenue:** $2,358 million\n* **Gross Profit:** $19,147 million\n* **Gross Profit Margin:** \n $$\\frac{\\$19,147}{\\$21,505} \\approx 89.0351\\% \\quad (\\text{or } 89.04\\%)$$\n\n---\n\n### **2. NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025 ended January 26, 2025)**\n* **Filing:** Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (`file_stem`: `0001045810-25-000023`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`)\n* **Revenue:** $130,497 million\n* **Cost of Revenue:** $32,639 million\n* **Gross Profit:** $97,858 million\n* **Gross Profit Margin:** \n $$\\frac{\\$97,858}{\\$130,497} \\approx 74.9887\\% \\quad (\\text{reported as } 75.0\\% \\text{ in Results of Operations})$$\n\n---\n\n### **Comparison**\n* **Higher Gross Profit Margin Percentage:** **Adobe Inc.** recorded the higher gross profit margin percentage.\n* **Percentage Point Difference:**\n * Using exact statement values: \n $$89.0351\\% - 74.9887\\% \\approx \\mathbf{14.05\\%} \\quad (14.0464 \\text{ percentage points})$$\n * Using NVIDIA's disclosed rounded margin ($75.0\\%$):\n $$89.04\\% - 75.00\\% = \\mathbf{14.04} \\text{ percentage points}$$", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all key facts: Adobe (FY2024, ended Nov 29, 2024) has the higher gross margin, with revenue of $21,505M, cost of revenue of $2,358M and gross profit of $19,147M, giving about 89.04%. NVIDIA (FY2025, ended Jan 26, 2025) has revenue of $130,497M, cost of revenue of $32,639M and gross profit of $97,858M, giving about 74.99%, reported as 75.0%. The headline difference of 14.05 percentage points matches the reference and the DuckDB output (14.0464). The candidate also gives a 14.04 alternative using NVIDIA's rounded 75.0%. That is a defensible secondary figure, but it slightly muddies the single answer. The candidate labels the difference as '%' in one place, though it also states percentage points. Every figure and date is traceable to the read_filing income statement outputs and the DuckDB computation, and the 'reported as 75.0%' statement is supported by the NVIDIA MD&A text in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0694921, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0660315, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0034606, "wall_seconds": 39.32321745599984, "api_seconds": 38.04938736400436, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 5, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 127991, "completion_tokens": 2013, "reasoning_tokens": 430, "cache_read_tokens": 17120, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6f6e3589fb0fedd3184f9272.json", "detail_js": "details/6f6e3589fb0fedd3184f9272.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6f6e3589fb0fedd3184f9272.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/146f3b79b40a4b3f96f05f38c8f3cfa1.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f3aab640649f40a092a9f2a8200f2434.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3d14ab46c96461490dc60f98", "question_id": "Q074", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which technology firm recorded a higher gross profit margin percentage, and what was the percentage point difference?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. recorded a gross profit margin of 89.04% ($19,147 million gross profit on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin of 74.99% (reported 75.0%) ($97,858 million on $130,497 million revenue) by 14.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA recorded the higher gross profit margin. Its FY2025 filing reports a **75.0%** gross margin. Adobe’s FY2024 filing reports gross profit of **$19,147 million** on revenue of **$21,505 million**, giving a margin of **19,147 ÷ 21,505 × 100 ≈ 89.0%**. Thus, **the available evidence shows Adobe’s margin was higher by approximately 14.0 percentage points**, not NVIDIA’s.\n\nEvidence: Adobe, file_stem `0000796343-25-000004`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet` (income statement figures); NVIDIA, file_stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` (reports gross margin of 75.0% for FY2025).", "correctness": 40, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The final conclusion matches the reference: Adobe's FY2024 gross margin (about 89.0%) exceeds NVIDIA's FY2025 margin (75.0% reported, 74.99% computed), by roughly 14.0 to 14.05 percentage points. However, the response opens by stating that NVIDIA recorded the higher margin, which is the opposite of the correct answer and contradicts its own later conclusion. That contradiction in the headline answer is a major error. The cited figures are supported by the tool output: Adobe gross profit 19147 and total revenue 21505 from file sfd-v1-2025-01, and NVIDIA's 'Gross margins increased to 75.0% in fiscal year 2025' from file sfd-v1-2025-02. The response does not cite NVIDIA's gross profit of 97,858 or revenue of 130,497, which appear in the reference, but the claims it does make are grounded in the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0046625500000000005, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0029128500000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017497, "wall_seconds": 43.3999094589999, "api_seconds": 40.8709204099996, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 53418, "completion_tokens": 2131, "reasoning_tokens": 896, "cache_read_tokens": 23935, "excerpt_characters": 9500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/3d14ab46c96461490dc60f98.json", "detail_js": "details/3d14ab46c96461490dc60f98.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3d14ab46c96461490dc60f98.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ba536af28c84a31a8e3d775df78175a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/102680457ecc4f9bafd3ebdc8f3d73b8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f79010a44e645e235621c4a9", "question_id": "Q074", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Adobe Inc. (FY2024) and NVIDIA Corporation (FY2025), which technology firm recorded a higher gross profit margin percentage, and what was the percentage point difference?", "reference": "Adobe Inc. recorded a gross profit margin of 89.04% ($19,147 million gross profit on $21,505 million revenue), exceeding NVIDIA Corporation's gross profit margin of 74.99% (reported 75.0%) ($97,858 million on $130,497 million revenue) by 14.05 percentage points.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the comparison from the returned evidence. The metadata lookup found no Adobe filing for 2024 in the provided files, and no gross-profit or revenue figures were returned for either company. So I can’t substantiate which margin was higher or calculate the percentage-point difference.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable from the gold filings: Adobe's FY2024 gross profit of 19,147 on 21,505 revenue (about 89.04%) versus NVIDIA's FY2025 gross profit of 97,858 on 130,497 revenue (about 74.99%), a difference of about 14.05 points. The candidate abstained, so it gives no comparison and no percentage-point figure, which makes it a wrong abstention on an answerable question. The tool evidence does not support the candidate's strongest claim. The DuckDB query filtered on year=2024, but the gold Adobe filing is accession 0000796343-25-000004, a 2025 filing, so the query could not match it. The search_filings calls scanned only 200 rows per file and returned complete=false, so they do not establish that no Adobe 2024 filing exists. The statement that no gross-profit or revenue figures were returned is accurate, but the claim that the files contain no Adobe 2024 filing is overstated.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002688415, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001663015, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010254, "wall_seconds": 27.23270475500067, "api_seconds": 25.324143715999526, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 22108, "completion_tokens": 1608, "reasoning_tokens": 561, "cache_read_tokens": 6074, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f79010a44e645e235621c4a9.json", "detail_js": "details/f79010a44e645e235621c4a9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f79010a44e645e235621c4a9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c6f3a9f10fd94444b7cbb048020db311.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a7e0470708c14265a26ba04564797492.request.json" }, { "task_id": "14c93caa96414136301c505a", "question_id": "Q075", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Exelon Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in total revenues reported by the two companies?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Total operating revenues of $23,028 million, whereas C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported Total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand ($17,725 million). Exelon's revenues exceeded C.H. Robinson's by $5,303 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from the available SEC filings:\n\n### 1. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.\nFrom the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (Accession / File Stem: `0001043277-25-000012`, CIK: `0001043277`, from `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n- **Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income** (in thousands):\n - **Revenues:**\n - Transportation: $16,353,745 thousand\n - Sourcing: $1,371,211 thousand\n - **Total revenues (fiscal year 2024):** **$17,724,956 thousand** (or **$17,724,956,000** / ~$17.725 billion).\n\n---\n\n### 2. Exelon Corporation\nAlthough Exelon Corporation's joint 2024 Form 10-K filing was identified (File Stem: `0001109357-25-000043`, CIK: `0001109357`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), queries to retrieve the Consolidated Statement of Operations for Exelon Corporation could not be completed within the query memory limits and tool budget.\n\n---\n\n### Conclusion / Limitation\nDue to the exhaustion of the tool budget, the total revenues for **Exelon Corporation** could not be extracted from the filing. Therefore, there is **insufficient evidence** to compute the exact difference in total revenues reported by the two companies for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: Exelon's total operating revenues were $23,028 million and C.H. Robinson's total revenues were $17,725 million, for a difference of $5,303 million. The candidate correctly reported C.H. Robinson's FY2024 total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand, with the right accession and units, and its transportation and sourcing breakdown matches the tool output. It did not retrieve Exelon's figure, so it gave no difference and abstained on the core question. Missing evidence does not excuse this, because the answer was retrievable. The candidate's account of the failed Exelon queries (out-of-memory errors and a duplicate-ID error) is consistent with the tool outputs. Its citations are well supported by the tool evidence for the C.H. Robinson figures. Nothing in the tool evidence supports the Exelon number, so that part is unsupported, though the candidate does not claim it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0452389, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.043845, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013939, "wall_seconds": 90.72397378200003, "api_seconds": 88.94034268599717, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 63174, "completion_tokens": 1845, "reasoning_tokens": 316, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001104659-25-044095", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078", "0001109357-25-000110", "0001109357-25-000113", "0001109357-25-000118" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/14c93caa96414136301c505a.json", "detail_js": "details/14c93caa96414136301c505a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/14c93caa96414136301c505a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b417f97b9b004320ab13a45a35756ae4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bd1e0d4e7ea640b09740b9d6dbd484a6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8176e781bfb2549f2288dfbf", "question_id": "Q075", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Exelon Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in total revenues reported by the two companies?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Total operating revenues of $23,028 million, whereas C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported Total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand ($17,725 million). Exelon's revenues exceeded C.H. Robinson's by $5,303 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the retrieved filings:\n\n1. **C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.** (from Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, `file_stem`: `0001043277-25-000012`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income):\n - **Transportation Revenue:** $16,353,745 thousand\n - **Sourcing Revenue:** $1,371,211 thousand\n - **Total Revenues:** **$17,724,956 thousand** (or **$17,724,956,000** / ~$17.725 billion)\n\n2. **Exelon Corporation**:\n - While Exelon Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K filing was located in the database (`file_stem`: `0001109357-25-000043` / CIK `0001109357`), reading the filing resulted in an error before the tool budget was exhausted.\n\n**Conclusion / Limitation:** \nBecause the tool budget was exhausted before Exelon Corporation's reported fiscal year 2024 total revenues could be retrieved from its filing, the evidence is **insufficient** to compute the exact difference between the two companies.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Exelon $23,028M minus C.H. Robinson $17,725M gives a $5,303M difference. The candidate correctly reported C.H. Robinson's total revenues ($17,724,956 thousand), with the transportation and sourcing breakdown, and those figures match the read_filing output. It did not retrieve Exelon's revenue, so it never computed the difference. Its abstention is not justified because the reference is answerable, though the tool budget and the Exelon read error are real. Citation support is high because every claim is backed by the tool outputs: the C.H. Robinson statement figures, the Exelon accession appearing in the index, and the 'Duplicate filing accession' error. The candidate's Exelon claim that the filing was 'located' is supported by the duckdb results, and the error claim matches the read_filing output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05574685, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.05330775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0024391, "wall_seconds": 32.766058948000136, "api_seconds": 31.849960218001797, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 87578, "completion_tokens": 1578, "reasoning_tokens": 382, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000019", "0001043277-25-000022", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001104659-25-033389", "0001109357-25-000014", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078", "0001109357-25-000113", "0001109357-25-000118", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/8176e781bfb2549f2288dfbf.json", "detail_js": "details/8176e781bfb2549f2288dfbf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8176e781bfb2549f2288dfbf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8bf090cae5234b86a8d6ca0c19cc860e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1eee5e76f3e04c348ba679292e06c273.request.json" }, { "task_id": "114bc29344d4dd1f9e1c74e8", "question_id": "Q075", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Comparing Exelon Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in total revenues reported by the two companies?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Total operating revenues of $23,028 million, whereas C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported Total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand ($17,725 million). Exelon's revenues exceeded C.H. Robinson's by $5,303 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the difference from the returned evidence. It provides C.H. Robinson’s fourth-quarter revenue commentary, but not its fiscal-year total revenue or Exelon’s fiscal-year 2024 revenue. The Exelon text queries failed, so there is not enough evidence to calculate a reliable difference.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Exelon's FY2024 total operating revenues were $23,028M and C.H. Robinson's total revenues were $17,724,956K (about $17,725M), giving a difference of $5,303M. The candidate abstains, so it provides no difference and no figures, which makes it incorrect for an answerable question. Its citation support is strong, though. The tool outputs contain no Exelon FY2024 revenue figure and no annual C.H. Robinson total. The only C.H. Robinson 'total revenues' hit is a Q4 commentary snippet, and the Exelon queries returned 'Duplicate filing ID' errors. The candidate accurately describes this gap. The gold evidence exists in the corpus, so the failure is retrieval, not unavailability, and it does not justify abstaining as if the answer were unknowable.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00423968, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00286708, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013726, "wall_seconds": 42.59615996100001, "api_seconds": 41.34710653100046, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52761, "completion_tokens": 1761, "reasoning_tokens": 655, "cache_read_tokens": 25663, "excerpt_characters": 1800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001980", "0000902219-25-000057", "0001043277-25-000004", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012578", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-013007", "0001104659-25-013559", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-014723", "0001104659-25-015142", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001109357-25-000002", "0001109357-25-000004", "0001109357-25-000006", "0001109357-25-000008", "0001109357-25-000010", "0001109357-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000014", "0001109357-25-000016", "0001109357-25-000018", "0001109357-25-000020", "0001109357-25-000022", "0001109357-25-000024", "0001109357-25-000026", "0001109357-25-000028", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000053", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/114bc29344d4dd1f9e1c74e8.json", "detail_js": "details/114bc29344d4dd1f9e1c74e8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/114bc29344d4dd1f9e1c74e8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9266c46a289e40ebae3f8228e4a3c74c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9004ca6109294eb3be40f1ec93825aac.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b5600b3e77bff6c31a5b128f", "question_id": "Q075", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Comparing Exelon Corporation and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. in fiscal year 2024, what was the difference in total revenues reported by the two companies?", "reference": "Exelon Corporation reported Total operating revenues of $23,028 million, whereas C.H. Robinson Worldwide reported Total revenues of $17,724,956 thousand ($17,725 million). Exelon's revenues exceeded C.H. Robinson's by $5,303 million.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the difference from the returned evidence. It gives C.H. Robinson’s 2024 total revenue only as a rounded **$17.7 billion**; it does not provide the exact revenue figures for both companies needed to calculate the difference.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Exelon's total operating revenues are $23,028M and C.H. Robinson's total revenues are $17,724,956K, for a difference of about $5,303M. The candidate abstained and did not provide the difference, so it fails the required answer. Abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable, and this one is not. The candidate's description of the tool evidence is accurate. The only C.H. Robinson revenue figure in the returned text is the rounded '$17.7 billion', and the Exelon read_filing and duckdb calls returned errors, so no Exelon revenue figure appears in the tool outputs. The abstention is honest about the retrieval failure, which earns the citation score, but the answer is still incorrect.", "known_cost_usd": 0.005613895000000001, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003626995, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019869, "wall_seconds": 37.09084468100082, "api_seconds": 35.83890561300177, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 67897, "completion_tokens": 1735, "reasoning_tokens": 789, "cache_read_tokens": 28787, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001109357-25-000043" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001104659-25-012576", "0001104659-25-012976", "0001104659-25-014187", "0001104659-25-014601", "0001104659-25-015187", "0001104659-25-028757", "0001109357-25-000041", "0001109357-25-000043", "0001109357-25-000046", "0001109357-25-000050", "0001109357-25-000074", "0001109357-25-000078", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b5600b3e77bff6c31a5b128f.json", "detail_js": "details/b5600b3e77bff6c31a5b128f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b5600b3e77bff6c31a5b128f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/adf0b995005248408886b1311f6f3027.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/aa37a7433aad4894ad7d0cc8ad07a6a1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4", "question_id": "Q076", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Cross-referencing Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K: What was the total gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares sold directly by Mr. Shriram at $205/share on January 31, 2025, and what fraction of Alphabet's 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 did this sale represent?", "reference": "The gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares was $2,870,000 (14,000 shares * $205 per share). Dividing 14,000 shares by Alphabet's 5,833,000,000 Class A shares outstanding yields approximately 0.00024% of the total outstanding Class A shares.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the figures stated in Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K:\n\n### 1. Total Gross Sale Price\n* **Number of Class A shares sold directly:** $14,000$ shares \n* **Sale price per share:** $\\$205.00$ \n$$\\text{Gross Sale Price} = 14,000 \\times \\$205.00 = \\$2,870,000$$\n\n### 2. Fraction of Alphabet's Class A Shares Outstanding\n* **Alphabet Inc. Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025:** $5,833\\text{ million} = 5,833,000,000\\text{ shares}$ (as disclosed on the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K).\n* **Fraction represented by the sale:**\n$$\\frac{14,000}{5,833,000,000} = \\frac{14}{5,833,000} = \\frac{2}{833,285} \\approx 2.40003 \\times 10^{-6} \\text{ (or approximately } 0.0002400\\% \\text{ / } 2.40 \\text{ parts per million)}$$", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 15, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic matches the reference. 14,000 × $205 = $2,870,000, and 14,000 / 5,833,000,000 ≈ 2.40 × 10⁻⁶, which is 0.00024%. Both figures agree with the reference. The candidate also correctly converts 5,833 million to 5,833,000,000 shares. Citation support is weak. The tool outputs only list file metadata and accession rows (including accession 0001652044-25-000014 with a large char_count, consistent with a 10-K). No tool call returned the Form 4 text showing 14,000 shares at $205 sold directly, nor the cover-page share count. The candidate's claims about those figures are therefore not supported by the retrieved tool evidence, even though they match the gold quotes. The candidate also calls the filing a '2024 Form 10-K' without tool confirmation of its form type.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0329212, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.031695, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012262, "wall_seconds": 29.896103889001097, "api_seconds": 29.168979276002574, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 45417, "completion_tokens": 1821, "reasoning_tokens": 590, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4.json", "detail_js": "details/1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1e05261f01bc125c7ee85ec4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7f1a806296c640168511f56d0e9501b2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d901d5a2afe24e6cb537a414f8f86101.request.json" }, { "task_id": "be750d11f28745df1dd20156", "question_id": "Q076", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Cross-referencing Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K: What was the total gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares sold directly by Mr. Shriram at $205/share on January 31, 2025, and what fraction of Alphabet's 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 did this sale represent?", "reference": "The gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares was $2,870,000 (14,000 shares * $205 per share). Dividing 14,000 shares by Alphabet's 5,833,000,000 Class A shares outstanding yields approximately 0.00024% of the total outstanding Class A shares.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from Alphabet Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: `0001652044-25-000014`, `file_id`: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n1. **Shares Outstanding:**\n * As stated on the cover page of Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K:\n > *\"As of January 28, 2025, there were 5,833 million shares of Alphabet's Class A stock outstanding...\"*\n * In exact share units: **5,833,000,000 Class A shares**.\n\n2. **Total Gross Sale Price:**\n * Number of Class A shares sold directly: **14,000 shares**\n * Sale price per share: **$205.00**\n * Total gross proceeds: \n $$\\text{Gross Sale Price} = 14{,}000 \\times \\$205.00 = \\mathbf{\\$2{,}870{,}000.00}$$\n\n3. **Fraction / Percentage of Class A Shares Outstanding:**\n * Ratio of shares sold to total Class A shares outstanding:\n $$\\frac{14{,}000}{5{,}833{,}000{,}000} = \\frac{14}{5{,}833{,}000} = \\frac{2}{833{,}285{,}714.285...} \\approx \\frac{1}{416{,}642.86}$$\n * In decimal and percentage terms:\n $$\\approx 0.000002400137 \\quad (\\approx \\mathbf{0.00024001\\%} \\text{ or approximately } \\mathbf{2.40 \\times 10^{-6}}\\text{ / } 2.40 \\text{ parts per million})$$", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's final figures match the reference: $2,870,000 gross proceeds (14,000 × $205) and a ratio of about 0.00024001%, or 2.40 ppm, of 5,833,000,000 Class A shares. One intermediate step is mis-scaled: 14/5,833,000 is written as 2/833,285,714, when it should be 2/833,285.7. The final reciprocal (1/416,642.86) is still correct. Citation support is only partial. The 5,833 million Class A shares figure is supported by the tool output from accession 0001652044-25-000014. Nothing in the tool evidence supports the Form 4 sale details (14,000 shares at $205, direct sale by Shriram). Every attempt to read the Form 4 (0000950170-25-011901) failed with errors, and the candidate did not cite the Form 4 at all.", "known_cost_usd": 0.038614050000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03735675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012573, "wall_seconds": 35.83490050200089, "api_seconds": 34.08455961200161, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52507, "completion_tokens": 1975, "reasoning_tokens": 595, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 300, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/be750d11f28745df1dd20156.json", "detail_js": "details/be750d11f28745df1dd20156.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/be750d11f28745df1dd20156.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/18315ce2d4094bff8375730dc2a21186.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ae90a62d047e43ec92b1fd32a3c8636b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3e580c187c15e50815598e3a", "question_id": "Q076", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Cross-referencing Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K: What was the total gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares sold directly by Mr. Shriram at $205/share on January 31, 2025, and what fraction of Alphabet's 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 did this sale represent?", "reference": "The gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares was $2,870,000 (14,000 shares * $205 per share). Dividing 14,000 shares by Alphabet's 5,833,000,000 Class A shares outstanding yields approximately 0.00024% of the total outstanding Class A shares.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The gross sale price was **$2,870,000** (14,000 × $205).\n\nRelative to 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding, 14,000 shares represent:\n\n**14,000 ÷ 5,833,000,000 ≈ 0.000002400**, or **0.000240%** (about **1 in 416,643** shares).\n\nI couldn’t verify the cited filings in the available Parquet records: the text lookup for the candidate filing IDs failed with a duplicate-filing-ID error. The figures above are therefore calculations from the numbers in your question, not independently verified filing data.", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 25, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic matches the reference. $2,870,000 is correct for 14,000 × $205. 14,000 ÷ 5,833,000,000 ≈ 0.00024%, and the 1-in-416,643 figure is also correct. The candidate also states plainly that the figures come from the question's numbers, not verified filing text. Citation support is weak. The tool output shows that accession 0000950170-25-011901 exists in the January 2025 file under the 1652044 accession prefix, but every text lookup failed with a duplicate-ID error. Nothing retrieved shows the 14,000-share sale at $205, the Form 4 table row, or the 5,833 million Class A share count. The candidate correctly flags this gap, but it does not reduce the correctness of the computed values.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002148965, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001149665, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009993, "wall_seconds": 31.278879958999823, "api_seconds": 30.420608566000737, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 23614, "completion_tokens": 1621, "reasoning_tokens": 869, "cache_read_tokens": 12614, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/3e580c187c15e50815598e3a.json", "detail_js": "details/3e580c187c15e50815598e3a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3e580c187c15e50815598e3a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9aa2eaede4ed4f5e978a91170e3fe6c5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/91be1e46d41d49d1a1a791067621b884.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6", "question_id": "Q076", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Cross-referencing Director Kavitark Ram Shriram's Form 4 filed January 31, 2025 and Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K: What was the total gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares sold directly by Mr. Shriram at $205/share on January 31, 2025, and what fraction of Alphabet's 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding as of January 28, 2025 did this sale represent?", "reference": "The gross sale price of the 14,000 Class A shares was $2,870,000 (14,000 shares * $205 per share). Dividing 14,000 shares by Alphabet's 5,833,000,000 Class A shares outstanding yields approximately 0.00024% of the total outstanding Class A shares.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The gross sale price was **$2,870,000** (14,000 × $205).\n\nRelative to 5,833 million Class A shares outstanding, the sale was **14,000 ÷ 5,833,000,000 ≈ 0.000002401 of the shares**, or **about 0.0002401%**.\n\nI couldn’t verify the filings in the available source: the metadata lookup found Alphabet filings but `read_filing` failed with “Duplicate filing accession in source.” The calculations above use the figures in your question.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 12, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic matches the reference: $2,870,000 gross proceeds, and 14,000 / 5,833,000,000 ≈ 0.00024%. It also states the units and the approximation clearly. The shares-outstanding figure and the sale details come from the question, not from verified filings. The tool evidence does not support them: read_filing failed with a duplicate-accession error, and the only Form 4 evidence is metadata showing an accession exists, with no transaction text. The gold accession 0001652044-25-000014 never appears in the tool output. The candidate discloses this verification gap, which is appropriate, but its citation support is weak because nothing in the tool evidence confirms the 14,000-share sale at $205 or the 5,833 million outstanding figure.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0022659250000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001248225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010177, "wall_seconds": 35.63361985300071, "api_seconds": 34.75181032499859, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32709, "completion_tokens": 1473, "reasoning_tokens": 669, "cache_read_tokens": 20680, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-011901", "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.5, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6.json", "detail_js": "details/3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3b25696a0678b185a0d264c6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/914e3ad626194048ab4ced157c6e2f45.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ce68a34985674ce4ae57a73faf45e05e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c40e242278f20f516a19b1dd", "question_id": "Q077", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what percentage of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from Service and other revenue versus Product revenue?", "reference": "Service and other revenue represented 76.71% ($53,413 million) of total revenue ($69,632 million), while Product revenue represented 23.29% ($16,219 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Microsoft Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (filing `0000950170-25-010491`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Part I, Item 1 - Income Statements):\n\n### **Revenue Breakdown for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2024**\n*(Amounts in millions)*\n\n* **Product revenue:** $16,219 million\n* **Service and other revenue:** $53,413 million\n* **Total revenue:** $69,632 million\n\n---\n\n### **Percentages of Total Revenue**\n\n* **Service and other revenue:**\n $$\\frac{\\$53,413}{\\$69,632} \\times 100 \\approx \\mathbf{76.71\\%} \\quad (76.7075\\%)$$\n\n* **Product revenue:**\n $$\\frac{\\$16,219}{\\$69,632} \\times 100 \\approx \\mathbf{23.29\\%} \\quad (23.2925\\%)$$", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every figure: Product revenue $16,219M, Service and other $53,413M, total $69,632M, with percentages of 23.29% and 76.71%. The arithmetic checks out (53413/69632 = 76.7075%, 16219/69632 = 23.2925%, and the components sum to the total). The accession number, filing period, and Part I Item 1 income statement location are all supported by the tool outputs, which show the income statement table with these exact values. The only minor shortfall is that the candidate's presentation includes extra formatting, not a substantive error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02630705, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02526975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010373, "wall_seconds": 25.02673791699999, "api_seconds": 23.425459301000956, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 37561, "completion_tokens": 1301, "reasoning_tokens": 202, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4100, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/c40e242278f20f516a19b1dd.json", "detail_js": "details/c40e242278f20f516a19b1dd.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c40e242278f20f516a19b1dd.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2e2bd85329564463a9122c749a9af98f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e52df07baede451594d6ba38d5ea8bf1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0b5a5ae323060c936d1b28e3", "question_id": "Q077", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what percentage of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from Service and other revenue versus Product revenue?", "reference": "Service and other revenue represented 76.71% ($53,413 million) of total revenue ($69,632 million), while Product revenue represented 23.29% ($16,219 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Microsoft Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024 (File stem: `0000950170-25-010491`, File ID: `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, Part I, Item 1 - Financial Statements, *Income Statements*), the breakdown of total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:\n\n### **Revenue Breakdown (Three Months Ended December 31, 2024)**\n* **Product revenue:** $16,219 million\n* **Service and other revenue:** $53,413 million\n* **Total revenue:** $69,632 million\n\n---\n\n### **Calculations**\n* **Service and other revenue percentage:**\n $$\\frac{\\$53,413\\text{ million}}{\\$69,632\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx 76.7075\\% \\quad (\\text{or } \\mathbf{76.71\\%})$$\n\n* **Product revenue percentage:**\n $$\\frac{\\$16,219\\text{ million}}{\\$69,632\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx 23.2925\\% \\quad (\\text{or } \\mathbf{23.29\\%})$$\n\nThus, **76.71%** of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from **Service and other revenue**, versus **23.29%** from **Product revenue**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference exactly: Service and other $53,413M, Product $16,219M, total $69,632M, giving 76.71% and 23.29%. The income statement text in the tool output (accession 0000950170-25-010491, Three Months Ended December 31, 2024) contains these values, and the DuckDB query independently returned 76.7075 and 23.2925, rounding to the stated percentages. The candidate's description of the filing as a 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 is also supported by the retrieved text. Minor deduction only because the candidate's citation of the file ID and stem is correct but the answer does not explicitly tie each figure to a quoted line.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03741665, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03575025, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016664, "wall_seconds": 28.258227633001297, "api_seconds": 27.0363856319982, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 57066, "completion_tokens": 1453, "reasoning_tokens": 206, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/0b5a5ae323060c936d1b28e3.json", "detail_js": "details/0b5a5ae323060c936d1b28e3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0b5a5ae323060c936d1b28e3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b1d3eb714ab44dbd95fa0d3e7bd8b491.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/de6488752e92462eb99a7284abdf8474.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6fb5178a87f45f2c1b949109", "question_id": "Q077", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what percentage of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from Service and other revenue versus Product revenue?", "reference": "Service and other revenue represented 76.71% ($53,413 million) of total revenue ($69,632 million), while Product revenue represented 23.29% ($16,219 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft reported total revenue of **$69,632 million**: **$53,413 million** from Service and other and **$16,219 million** from Product.\n\n- **Service and other:** $53,413 ÷ $69,632 × 100 = **76.7%**\n- **Product:** $16,219 ÷ $69,632 × 100 = **23.3%**\n\nSource: Microsoft 10-Q, file_stem **0000950170-25-010491**, file **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**; income statement table, evidence returned by the SQL query.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's dollar figures match the reference and the income statement table in the tool output: Service and other $53,413M, Product $16,219M, Total revenue $69,632M, all for the three months ended December 31, 2024. Its percentages check out: 53,413/69,632 = 76.71%, shown as 76.7%, and 16,219/69,632 = 23.29%, shown as 23.3%. The only gap from the reference is one-decimal rounding, which is acceptable. The cited accession and parquet file match the tool results, and the income statement table supports every number. The answer also accounts for the full question by giving both percentages.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003497905, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0018612049999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016367, "wall_seconds": 28.301063889000943, "api_seconds": 25.218848928996522, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 52805, "completion_tokens": 1317, "reasoning_tokens": 293, "cache_read_tokens": 29558, "excerpt_characters": 11000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/6fb5178a87f45f2c1b949109.json", "detail_js": "details/6fb5178a87f45f2c1b949109.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6fb5178a87f45f2c1b949109.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dbe9d98caeea4ad487b8f6f62ae732f2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b3545e590f1340d6b6cc038eae6ef1d8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d80254ce6e11330f667418a8", "question_id": "Q077", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, what percentage of Microsoft Corporation's total revenue was derived from Service and other revenue versus Product revenue?", "reference": "Service and other revenue represented 76.71% ($53,413 million) of total revenue ($69,632 million), while Product revenue represented 23.29% ($16,219 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For the three months ended December 31, 2024, Microsoft reported total revenue of **$69,632 million**: **$53,413 million** from Service and other, and **$16,219 million** from Product.\n\n- **Service and other:** $53,413 ÷ $69,632 = **76.71%**\n- **Product:** $16,219 ÷ $69,632 = **23.29%**\n\nSource: Microsoft’s filing, file stem `0000950170-25-010491`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, at characters 5946–17946. The filing’s income statement labels the amounts in millions.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the filing table: total revenue $69,632M, Service and other $53,413M, and Product $16,219M for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The percentages are correct at 76.71% and 23.29%, and the tool's DuckDB output confirms them. The units are stated as millions, which matches the 'In millions' header in the read_filing text. The cited accession, file ID, and character range (5946–17946) match the tool outputs. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not restate the reference's exact dollar-plus-percentage pairing for Product in the same sentence form, but all required content is present.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003134435, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001537335, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015971, "wall_seconds": 21.295649046000108, "api_seconds": 20.607670565997978, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 37351, "completion_tokens": 938, "reasoning_tokens": 318, "cache_read_tokens": 14281, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010491" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-010484", "0000950170-25-010491", "0001062993-25-001517", "0001062993-25-001518", "0001062993-25-001519", "0001062993-25-001520", "0001062993-25-001521", "0001062993-25-001522", "0001062993-25-001523", "0001062993-25-001524", "0001062993-25-001525", "0001062993-25-001526", "0001062993-25-001527", "0001193125-25-010492" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d80254ce6e11330f667418a8.json", "detail_js": "details/d80254ce6e11330f667418a8.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d80254ce6e11330f667418a8.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ef6a1747aeed415384b0d59b38eb1c2f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc6da0db054b493aabc83a05a806715b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3dca8fca2dcf3bbc754d9247", "question_id": "Q078", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what percentage of Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream was generated specifically by Handsets?", "reference": "Handsets generated 75.11% of total QCT revenues ($7,574 million out of $10,084 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Qualcomm Incorporated's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (Filing ID: `0000804328-25-000011`, Note 1 \"Basis of Presentation - Revenues\", in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **1. QCT Revenue Stream Breakdown (Three Months Ended December 29, 2024)**\n* **Handsets:** $7,574 million\n* **Automotive:** $961 million\n* **IoT (internet of things):** $1,549 million\n* **Total QCT revenues:** **$10,084 million**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Percentage Calculation**\n$$\\text{Handsets Percentage} = \\frac{\\$7,574\\text{ million}}{\\$10,084\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.7510908... \\text{ or } \\mathbf{75.11\\%}$$\n\n* Rounded to two decimal places: **75.11%** (or **75.1%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer is correct. Handsets revenue of $7,574M over total QCT revenues of $10,084M gives 75.11%, matching the reference, and the period (three months ended December 29, 2024), units (millions), and accession number are all right. The main flaw is the section label. The candidate cites 'Note 1 Basis of Presentation - Revenues', while the gold evidence places the table in Note 7 (Segment Information). The tool outputs show the table text and accession but never establish a note number, so the Note 1 label is unsupported. The numbers themselves are well supported by the tool snippet, which contains the exact table rows. The rounding to 75.1% is also acceptable.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03146765, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03033675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011309, "wall_seconds": 31.542790985000465, "api_seconds": 29.37797229499847, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 43588, "completion_tokens": 1634, "reasoning_tokens": 421, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/3dca8fca2dcf3bbc754d9247.json", "detail_js": "details/3dca8fca2dcf3bbc754d9247.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3dca8fca2dcf3bbc754d9247.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/61f9a8bf2bec4889af9367b2d4f53c0e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3d95257fb5e74896b5a72ee9387f3a39.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a05be6cfb8b6dc8ec6073f0b", "question_id": "Q078", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what percentage of Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream was generated specifically by Handsets?", "reference": "Handsets generated 75.11% of total QCT revenues ($7,574 million out of $10,084 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Qualcomm Incorporated's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000804328-25-000011`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, Note 1, *Revenues* / *QCT revenue streams*):\n\n### **1. QCT Revenue Stream Breakdown (Three Months Ended December 29, 2024)**\n* **Handsets:** $7,574 million\n* **Automotive:** $961 million\n* **IoT (internet of things):** $1,549 million\n* **Total QCT revenues:** **$10,084 million**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation**\n$$\\text{Percentage} = \\frac{\\text{Handsets Revenue}}{\\text{Total QCT Revenues}} = \\frac{\\$7,574\\text{ million}}{\\$10,084\\text{ million}} \\approx 75.10908\\%$$\n\n* Rounded to two decimal places: **75.11%** (or approximately **75.1%**).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 7,574 / 10,084 = 75.109%, which rounds to 75.11%, matching the reference. The period (three months ended December 29, 2024), units (millions), and figures all match the tool output. The main flaw is citation labeling: the candidate attributes the QCT revenue stream table to 'Note 1', but the tool output places it in the Revenues disaggregation within the notes that precede Note 3, which is Note 2. The numbers themselves are fully supported by the retrieved filing text, so the deduction is for the incorrect note reference only.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0669289, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0642735, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0026554, "wall_seconds": 35.433925354000166, "api_seconds": 34.139595555001506, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 105537, "completion_tokens": 1343, "reasoning_tokens": 307, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/a05be6cfb8b6dc8ec6073f0b.json", "detail_js": "details/a05be6cfb8b6dc8ec6073f0b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a05be6cfb8b6dc8ec6073f0b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/95261466524b489c89efdc22421bb8b7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c073f2a0f1a045e8bcdb1ca895eda731.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c6dd8ac18ba1585acf510666", "question_id": "Q078", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what percentage of Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream was generated specifically by Handsets?", "reference": "Handsets generated 75.11% of total QCT revenues ($7,574 million out of $10,084 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Handsets generated **about 75.1%** of Qualcomm’s QCT revenue for the quarter ended December 29, 2024: **$7,574 million ÷ $10,084 million × 100 = 75.1%**.\n\nSource: Qualcomm Incorporated’s Form 10-Q, accession/file_stem `0000804328-25-000011`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; QCT revenue-stream table (SQL text-query evidence, passage at approximately character 22,745).", "correctness": 93, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: $7,574M / $10,084M = 75.109%, so 75.1% at one decimal matches the reference's 75.11% at two decimals. The 'about' hedge is acceptable. The period (quarter ended December 29, 2024), the accession 0000804328-25-000011, and the Handsets and Total QCT figures all match the reference and the gold quote. Citation support is strong: the tool output shows the Handsets row ($7574) and Total QCT revenues ($10084) in the same table, the 'handsets' match at position 22745 matches the cited character offset, and the source parquet file is correct. Minor deduction only for rounding to one decimal rather than the reference's two.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0023354350000000003, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001150435, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001185, "wall_seconds": 21.66813884200019, "api_seconds": 20.364347335000275, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26882, "completion_tokens": 943, "reasoning_tokens": 305, "cache_read_tokens": 10896, "excerpt_characters": 7800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/c6dd8ac18ba1585acf510666.json", "detail_js": "details/c6dd8ac18ba1585acf510666.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c6dd8ac18ba1585acf510666.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6d14177002e0430890b4c1e24f6fe367.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/77613d4459704306a01aba11cf8ff85e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b7da1bf0bb46a3ad9cfb354f", "question_id": "Q078", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024, what percentage of Qualcomm Incorporated's total QCT revenue stream was generated specifically by Handsets?", "reference": "Handsets generated 75.11% of total QCT revenues ($7,574 million out of $10,084 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Handsets generated **75.1%** of Qualcomm’s QCT revenue for the first fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2024: **$7,574 million ÷ $10,084 million × 100 = 75.1%**.\n\nSource: Qualcomm Q1 FY2025 filing, `file_stem` **0000804328-25-000011**, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at character offsets **21,744–33,744**.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figure is correct: 7,574 / 10,084 = 75.109%, which rounds to 75.1% (the reference's 75.11% is the same value at two decimals). The period (quarter ended December 29, 2024), the $7,574M and $10,084M figures, and the arithmetic all match the filing table. The cited accession 0000804328-25-000011, the file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the character offsets 21,744–33,744 all match the read_filing tool output. The only deduction is for precision, since 75.1% is slightly less precise than the reference's 75.11%.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00239451, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00121031, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011842, "wall_seconds": 20.682282698999188, "api_seconds": 19.505551408999963, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26554, "completion_tokens": 816, "reasoning_tokens": 247, "cache_read_tokens": 9341, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000804328-25-000010", "0000804328-25-000011", "0001104659-25-005602", "0001104659-25-005611", "0001104659-25-005625", "0001214659-25-003294", "0001888316-25-000001", "0001888316-25-000002", "0001888316-25-000003", "0001888316-25-000005", "0001888316-25-000006", "0001888316-25-000007", "0001888316-25-000008", "0001888316-25-000009", "0001950047-25-000692", "0001950047-25-001109", "0001958244-25-000006", "0001958244-25-001192" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/b7da1bf0bb46a3ad9cfb354f.json", "detail_js": "details/b7da1bf0bb46a3ad9cfb354f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b7da1bf0bb46a3ad9cfb354f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b3f6abe175694bbf8827031814bb36bc.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1e40d03e55fd4a9e957f4ae42bf7133d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7eccfec231eaf53b721c256f", "question_id": "Q079", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025, what were the two tranches of senior notes issued, including their respective interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount?", "reference": "Ford Motor Credit Company LLC issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and (2) $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, representing a combined aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000,000 ($2.5 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings searched within the dataset and available tool budget, the specific Form 8-K filed by **Ford Motor Credit Company LLC** on **January 7, 2025** could not be retrieved. \n\nThe filings examined under Ford Motor Company (CIK `0000037996`) for early January 2025 did not cover the January 7, 2025 Form 8-K for Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, and the tool budget was exhausted before locating and accessing the specific filing. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence in the retrieved data to provide the interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount for the two tranches of senior notes.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence states $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, totaling $2.5 billion. The candidate abstains and provides none of the requested rates, maturity dates, or total principal, so it is wrong on the answerable question. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. Citation support is moderate. The candidate's description of the search (failed binder and memory errors, a Ford Motor Company CIK 0000037996 scope, and an exhausted budget) matches the tool outputs. However, the tool outputs never confirm that the Ford Motor Credit 8-K was absent. Accession 0000932471-25-000033 appears under CIK 37996 in the results and was never opened, so the claim that the filing was not covered is only partly supported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02714495, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02610675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010382, "wall_seconds": 30.921767954001552, "api_seconds": 29.928699669999332, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 37911, "completion_tokens": 1456, "reasoning_tokens": 361, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-001594" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000037996-25-000002", "0000037996-25-000003", "0000037996-25-000004", "0000037996-25-000006", "0000040533-25-000003", "0000932471-25-000033", "0001959173-25-000566" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7eccfec231eaf53b721c256f.json", "detail_js": "details/7eccfec231eaf53b721c256f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7eccfec231eaf53b721c256f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ec19cedc7e9d421898f47494d7b512b3.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/469ff6413f2d4b42bacf314eb0cb69e7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "144e00066c63b99e12b245fe", "question_id": "Q079", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025, what were the two tranches of senior notes issued, including their respective interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount?", "reference": "Ford Motor Credit Company LLC issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and (2) $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, representing a combined aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000,000 ($2.5 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025 (Filing accession / `file_stem`: `0001104659-25-001594`, CIK / `accession`: `0000038009`), under **Item 8.01 (Other Events)**, the details of the two tranches of senior notes issued and sold are as follows:\n\n### 1. Tranche 1\n* **Notes:** 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 (the \"2029 Notes\")\n* **Interest Rate:** 5.875%\n* **Maturity Date:** November 7, 2029\n* **Principal Amount:** $1,250,000,000\n\n---\n\n### 2. Tranche 2\n* **Notes:** 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035 (the \"2035 Notes\")\n* **Interest Rate:** 6.500%\n* **Maturity Date:** February 7, 2035\n* **Principal Amount:** $1,250,000,000\n\n---\n\n### Total Combined Principal Amount\n$$\\$1,250,000,000 + \\$1,250,000,000 = \\mathbf{\\$2,500,000,000}$$ ($2.5 billion)", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every element: both tranches (5.875% due November 7, 2029, $1,250,000,000; 6.500% due February 7, 2035, $1,250,000,000), the correct interest rates and maturity dates, and the combined $2,500,000,000 total. The tool output from read_filing directly supports each figure, the Item 8.01 section, the filing date of January 7, 2025, the accession 0001104659-25-001594, and the CIK 0000038009. The only minor gap is that the answer's table-style formatting adds no new facts, so citation support is near-complete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.025939, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0246915, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012475, "wall_seconds": 27.121453617000952, "api_seconds": 26.10193433499626, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 39582, "completion_tokens": 1163, "reasoning_tokens": 170, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10032, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-001594" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000037996-25-000002", "0000037996-25-000003", "0000037996-25-000004", "0000037996-25-000006", "0000932471-25-000033", "0001104659-25-000148", "0001104659-25-000362", "0001104659-25-000816", "0001104659-25-001594", "0001104659-25-002448", "0001104659-25-004778", "0001104659-25-005862", "0001104659-25-006180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/144e00066c63b99e12b245fe.json", "detail_js": "details/144e00066c63b99e12b245fe.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/144e00066c63b99e12b245fe.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c1a9f5e4015546b2b9fe457bef4fc10b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/089c1b5778d54204af5deff231d0d5fc.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c5965728c831064c5a97c49d", "question_id": "Q079", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025, what were the two tranches of senior notes issued, including their respective interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount?", "reference": "Ford Motor Credit Company LLC issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and (2) $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, representing a combined aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000,000 ($2.5 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The Form 8-K identifies two tranches: **5.875% senior notes due November 7, 2029**, with principal of **$1.25 billion**, and **6.500% senior notes due February 7, 2035**, also with principal of **$1.25 billion**. Their combined principal amount was **$2.5 billion** ($1.25 billion + $1.25 billion).\n\nSource: Form 8-K, file_stem **0001104659-25-001594**, file_id **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**; the notes and amounts are stated in the returned text from the exhibit opinion passage (within the query’s substring beginning at character 6000).", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every element: the 5.875% notes due November 7, 2029 and the 6.500% notes due February 7, 2035, each at $1.25 billion, for a combined $2.5 billion. The tool output supports these facts. The 8-K header (accession 0001104659-25-001594, filed January 7, 2025) and the Exhibit 5.1 opinion text within the substring(parsed_md, 6000, 6000) query both state the two series and amounts. The term sheet also confirms the 2029 notes' rate, principal, and maturity. The file and accession identifiers are correct. Minor deduction only because the cited gold quote is truncated and the candidate's pointer to the 'exhibit opinion passage' is a slightly loose locator rather than an exact quote.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00567836, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00359796, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0020804, "wall_seconds": 41.16309494000052, "api_seconds": 39.20300552399567, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 76362, "completion_tokens": 1597, "reasoning_tokens": 578, "cache_read_tokens": 36571, "excerpt_characters": 16333, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-001594" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-000148", "0001104659-25-000362", "0001104659-25-000816", "0001104659-25-001594", "0001104659-25-002448", "0001104659-25-004778", "0001104659-25-005862", "0001104659-25-006180", "0001176256-25-000002", "0001193125-25-004148", "0001193125-25-008527", "0001193125-25-010053", "0001193125-25-010461", "0001193125-25-011425", "0001193125-25-013375", "0001214659-25-000005", "0001214659-25-000006", "0001214659-25-000011", "0001214659-25-000014", "0001214659-25-000024", "0001214659-25-000037", "0001214659-25-000038", "0001214659-25-000039", "0001214659-25-000041", "0001214659-25-000056", "0001214659-25-000058", "0001214659-25-000061", "0001214659-25-000062" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c5965728c831064c5a97c49d.json", "detail_js": "details/c5965728c831064c5a97c49d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c5965728c831064c5a97c49d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c3aa58690e2148309f7e4a56b4fe669a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/393a453af6df4f2a9c4518d125f987f5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2744c89bc98dcc42d5baee64", "question_id": "Q079", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to the Form 8-K filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC on January 7, 2025, what were the two tranches of senior notes issued, including their respective interest rates, maturity dates, and total combined principal amount?", "reference": "Ford Motor Credit Company LLC issued and sold (1) $1,250,000,000 of 5.875% Notes due November 7, 2029 and (2) $1,250,000,000 of 6.500% Notes due February 7, 2035, representing a combined aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000,000 ($2.5 billion).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The January 7, 2025 Form 8-K reports two tranches:\n\n- **5.875% senior notes due November 7, 2029:** $1.25 billion principal\n- **6.500% senior notes due February 7, 2035:** $1.25 billion principal\n\n**Combined principal amount: $2.5 billion.**\n\nSource: Form 8-K, accession/file_stem **0001104659-25-001594**, in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, filing text at character offset **0** (Item 8.01); the same amounts and terms are stated in Exhibit 5.1.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 93, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on every element: both tranches, the 5.875% due November 7, 2029 and 6.500% due February 7, 2035 notes, the $1.25 billion principal for each, and the $2.5 billion combined total. The tool output from read_filing supports the accession number and the Item 8.01 text, and Exhibit 5.1 in the same retrieved text repeats the rates, dates, and amounts, so the claim about the exhibit holds. The one weakness is the phrasing 'filing text at character offset 0 (Item 8.01)'. Offset 0 is the start of the returned chunk, not the location of Item 8.01, which appears later in that chunk. This is a minor citation imprecision and does not change the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002736755, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001432755, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001304, "wall_seconds": 72.48638277300051, "api_seconds": 71.47783620299924, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31578, "completion_tokens": 1340, "reasoning_tokens": 599, "cache_read_tokens": 14043, "excerpt_characters": 10032, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-001594" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-000148", "0001104659-25-000362", "0001104659-25-000816", "0001104659-25-001594", "0001104659-25-002448", "0001104659-25-004778", "0001104659-25-005862", "0001104659-25-006180" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2744c89bc98dcc42d5baee64.json", "detail_js": "details/2744c89bc98dcc42d5baee64.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2744c89bc98dcc42d5baee64.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cdf7ced6f42e45db9fe499af0dfae97e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c088885754ca4d15a1ba527a13545ec2.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b7f8588e92e220e898985f34", "question_id": "Q080", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What information was furnished by PepsiCo, Inc. under Item 2.02 in its Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025?", "reference": "PepsiCo, Inc. furnished its public press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, attached as Exhibit 99.1.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings available in the dataset for PepsiCo, Inc. (CIK: 0000077476) during February 2025:\n\n### 1. Form 8-K Filing Date Verification\n* PepsiCo filed a **Form 8-K** on **February 4, 2025** (accession / file stem: `0000077476-25-000008`), not on February 11, 2025. \n* On **February 7, 2025**, PepsiCo filed a **Form 8-K/A** (file stem: `0000077476-25-000012`) under Item 5.02 (*Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers*).\n* No Form 8-K was filed by PepsiCo on February 11, 2025 in the dataset (PepsiCo's Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2024 was filed under file stem `0000077476-25-000007`).\n\n---\n\n### 2. Item 2.02 Information Furnished (from the February 4, 2025 Form 8-K)\nIn PepsiCo's Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2025 (`0000077476-25-000008`), the filing header confirms items:\n* **Item 2.02**: **Results of Operations and Financial Condition**\n* **Item 9.01**: **Financial Statements and Exhibits**\n\nUnder Item 2.02 (*Results of Operations and Financial Condition*), registrants furnish their earnings release and financial results for the completed fiscal period (for PepsiCo, this corresponded to its fourth quarter and full-year financial results for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024).\n\n*(Note: If the query specifically intended a Form 8-K dated February 11, 2025, no such Form 8-K exists in the February 2025 filings for PepsiCo, Inc. in the database).*", "correctness": 60, "citation_support": 60, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies accession 0000077476-25-000008 as PepsiCo's Item 2.02 8-K. Its filing header shows FILED AS OF DATE 20250204, so it rightly rejects the question's February 11 date, and the 8-K/A (Feb 7, Item 5.02) is also supported by the tool output. The reference's premise of a February 11 filing is contradicted by the data, so the correction is warranted. However, the answer is only partly complete: it does not state that the furnished content is a press release attached as Exhibit 99.1, and it describes the Item 2.02 content generically. The claims that the release covers the fiscal year ended December 28, 2024, and that 0000077476-25-000007 is the 10-K, are inferences not shown in the retrieved excerpts (which cover only the header and first ~2,000-3,000 characters). Citation support is therefore good for dates, accession numbers, and items, but weaker for the substantive content description.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04023025, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03853575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016945, "wall_seconds": 70.05386262600041, "api_seconds": 68.14258267999503, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 56931, "completion_tokens": 2279, "reasoning_tokens": 765, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000008" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000007", "0000077476-25-000008", "0000077476-25-000012", "0001104659-25-009395", "0001104659-25-009744", "0001104659-25-010139", "0001104659-25-010578", "0001628280-25-005691", "0001950047-25-001303" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b7f8588e92e220e898985f34.json", "detail_js": "details/b7f8588e92e220e898985f34.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b7f8588e92e220e898985f34.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/39115cf66c614f1682723c0cc813ec82.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/76131435b83c40999d24f8a8b4a8c512.request.json" }, { "task_id": "958d7c13bd1c59c45590e805", "question_id": "Q080", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What information was furnished by PepsiCo, Inc. under Item 2.02 in its Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025?", "reference": "PepsiCo, Inc. furnished its public press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, attached as Exhibit 99.1.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected for **PepsiCo, Inc.** (CIK: `0000077476`) in February 2025:\n\n- In filing `0000077476-25-000012` (the Form 8-K filed on or around February 11, 2025), a search for **Item 2.02** returned `found: false`, indicating that **Item 2.02** was not included or furnished in that Form 8-K report.\n- (For comparison, PepsiCo's earlier Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2025, accession `0000077476-25-000008`, was the filing that furnished Item 2.02 *Results of Operations and Financial Condition*).\n\nBecause the tool budget was exhausted before reading the entire contents of filing `0000077476-25-000012`, evidence is insufficient to provide any further details regarding other items furnished in that filing.", "correctness": 25, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference says the February 11, 2025 8-K furnished Item 2.02 with Exhibit 99.1 (Q4 and full-year 2024 results). The candidate instead concludes that the Feb 11 filing (0000077476-25-000012) does not contain Item 2.02, and it gives no press-release content, so it misses the core answer. The tool evidence does not support the reference's Feb 11 framing either: the Item 2.02 filing it shows is 0000077476-25-000008, dated February 4, 2025, and the reference cites that same accession. The candidate correctly identifies -000008 as the Item 2.02 filing and reports a found:false result for -000012, but it never verifies that -000012 was filed on February 11, and its claim that the budget was exhausted before reading the full filing conflicts with the read_filing output showing total_chars 5949. The correctness score reflects the wrong conclusion about the Feb 11 filing and the absence of the required content. The citation score reflects that the -000008 claims are supported while the date identification for -000012 is not.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02867275, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02743425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012385, "wall_seconds": 67.16832098899977, "api_seconds": 65.40035830099987, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 39069, "completion_tokens": 1979, "reasoning_tokens": 763, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000008" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000007", "0000077476-25-000008", "0000077476-25-000012", "0001104659-25-009395", "0001104659-25-009744", "0001104659-25-010139", "0001104659-25-010578", "0001628280-25-005691", "0001950047-25-001303" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/958d7c13bd1c59c45590e805.json", "detail_js": "details/958d7c13bd1c59c45590e805.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/958d7c13bd1c59c45590e805.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c9a455a3f4054703b5bc25bb1ba04436.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e44ab0ae3cdc414ba68e454bdc3c4802.request.json" }, { "task_id": "5c12e33799390f028a9dfdaf", "question_id": "Q080", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What information was furnished by PepsiCo, Inc. under Item 2.02 in its Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025?", "reference": "PepsiCo, Inc. furnished its public press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, attached as Exhibit 99.1.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence does not identify a PepsiCo Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025, or establish what it furnished under Item 2.02. The 8-K records inspected were filed February 4 and February 7, and their Item information does not show Item 2.02. I can’t determine the requested information from the available evidence.", "correctness": 30, "citation_support": 35, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate abstains, but its key claim is contradicted by the tool evidence. The header for accession 0000077476-25-000008 lists 'ITEM INFORMATION: Results of Operations and Financial Condition', which is Item 2.02, yet the candidate says the item information does not show Item 2.02. The candidate is right that no filing dated February 11, 2025 was found: the 000008 filing is dated February 4, 2025, and the other PepsiCo 8-Ks inspected were dated February 7. The reference's content (a press release for Q4/FY2024 furnished as Exhibit 99.1) is supported by the gold quote, but the transcript does not show that text, so the candidate could not be faulted for omitting it. Because the question is answerable from the gold filing despite the date mismatch, a full abstention is only partly correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004600455, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002858955, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017415, "wall_seconds": 74.13506477299961, "api_seconds": 71.5580913199974, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57443, "completion_tokens": 2050, "reasoning_tokens": 1060, "cache_read_tokens": 28528, "excerpt_characters": 11350, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000008" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000007", "0000077476-25-000008", "0000077476-25-000012", "0001104659-25-009395", "0001104659-25-009744", "0001104659-25-010139", "0001104659-25-010578", "0001628280-25-005691", "0001950047-25-001303" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/5c12e33799390f028a9dfdaf.json", "detail_js": "details/5c12e33799390f028a9dfdaf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/5c12e33799390f028a9dfdaf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/631a7e4dbe224fbd82eb8ed52e822bcb.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/024283a8b12c474292bdcbc0e0d9321f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "cebbe62dfa53229fdd828bc1", "question_id": "Q080", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What information was furnished by PepsiCo, Inc. under Item 2.02 in its Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025?", "reference": "PepsiCo, Inc. furnished its public press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, attached as Exhibit 99.1.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned filing identifies the Item 2.02 information as PepsiCo’s February 4, 2025 press release reporting financial results for the 16 and 52 weeks ended December 28, 2024. The release covered fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 results, the 2025 financial outlook, and an annual dividend increase.\n\nEvidence: filing `0000077476-25-000008`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, returned text at character offsets 3284–15284. **Limitation:** the returned evidence does not establish that this is the Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2025; the filing text describes the release as dated February 4, 2025.", "correctness": 82, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate identifies the same Item 2.02 content as the reference: a press release furnished as Exhibit 99.1 reporting results for the periods ended December 28, 2024. The tool output supports this. The Item 2.02 text in accession 0000077476-25-000008 says Exhibit 99.1 is furnished, and the release covers Q4 and full-year 2024 results, the 2025 outlook, and the dividend increase. The candidate's 16- and 52-week wording is consistent with the reference's period-end date. The candidate correctly flags that the evidence does not confirm the February 11, 2025 filing date. The tool results support this: a date-scoped query for 20250211 returned no rows, and the filing text dates the release February 4, 2025 with a signature date of February 3. The reference does not mention the date issue, so the candidate's extra caveat is accurate rather than a deviation. The answer is not fully identical to the reference, since it names the February 4 release date and adds content, but it does not conflict with it. The main deduction is that the candidate frames the answer around a filing whose stated date does not match the question.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004162355, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002623555, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015388, "wall_seconds": 40.75560871000016, "api_seconds": 39.192828554998414, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52104, "completion_tokens": 1781, "reasoning_tokens": 768, "cache_read_tokens": 25658, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000008" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000077476-25-000007", "0000077476-25-000008", "0000077476-25-000012", "0001104659-25-009395", "0001104659-25-009744", "0001104659-25-010139", "0001104659-25-010578", "0001628280-25-005691", "0001950047-25-001303" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/cebbe62dfa53229fdd828bc1.json", "detail_js": "details/cebbe62dfa53229fdd828bc1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/cebbe62dfa53229fdd828bc1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/dc21439c91a4448b86d636b73a56067a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8985cf3cb80046c8b70795d0a44b502b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a1e0fc5368a30bb557dcb781", "question_id": "Q081", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What event was disclosed by Pfizer Inc. under Item 2.02 of its Form 8-K filed in February 2025?", "reference": "Pfizer Inc. furnished its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2024 and 2025 financial guidance under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Under **Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition)** of its Form 8-K filed on **February 4, 2025** (file stem: `0000078003-25-000017`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), Pfizer Inc. disclosed the following:\n\n* **Event Disclosed:** \n Pfizer Inc. announced that on **February 4, 2025**, it issued a press release announcing its **financial results for the fourth-quarter and full-year 2024** (furnished as Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K).", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies the Item 2.02 disclosure: a February 4, 2025 press release reporting Q4 and full-year 2024 results, furnished as Exhibit 99. The date, accession, and filing type match the tool output. The reference also mentions 2025 financial guidance. The tool evidence supports this through the Exhibit 99 headline, 'Pfizer Reports Strong Full-Year 2024 Results And Reaffirms 2025 Guidance', which the candidate omits, so the answer is mostly but not fully complete. The candidate's claims are well supported by the retrieved text. The item-level quote is not reproduced verbatim, but the evidence it relies on is present in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02053615, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01951275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010234, "wall_seconds": 23.233208305000517, "api_seconds": 21.698342870999113, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30451, "completion_tokens": 1160, "reasoning_tokens": 294, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 4500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017", "0000078003-25-000040", "0000078003-25-000042", "0000078003-25-000048", "0000078003-25-000052", "0000078003-25-000054", "0001225208-25-001142", "0001225208-25-001778", "0001225208-25-001805", "0001225208-25-002397", "0001225208-25-002399", "0001225208-25-002400", "0001225208-25-002401", "0001225208-25-002402", "0001225208-25-002412", "0001225208-25-002413", "0001225208-25-002612", "0001225208-25-002613" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/a1e0fc5368a30bb557dcb781.json", "detail_js": "details/a1e0fc5368a30bb557dcb781.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a1e0fc5368a30bb557dcb781.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8c27bc8455b544378f5aafbeee76012d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0ebc6bff4fbd43d3b76db3c8dfa5b24c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7c18f7f5f02b2b702ff094a6", "question_id": "Q081", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What event was disclosed by Pfizer Inc. under Item 2.02 of its Form 8-K filed in February 2025?", "reference": "Pfizer Inc. furnished its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2024 and 2025 financial guidance under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "In its Form 8-K dated and filed on **February 4, 2025** (file stem `0000078003-25-000017`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), Pfizer Inc. disclosed under **Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition)** that:\n\n* On **February 4, 2025**, Pfizer Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the **fourth quarter and full year 2024** (furnished as Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K).", "correctness": 78, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies the February 4, 2025 press release under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition), the Q4 and full-year 2024 results, the Exhibit 99 furnishing, and the accession 0000078003-25-000017. These match the read_filing output. It omits the reference's point that the release also reaffirmed 2025 financial guidance, which appears in the tool output's Exhibit 99 text, so the answer is incomplete. The claim that the 8-K was 'filed' on February 4 is inferred from the 'Dated' line rather than a explicit filing-date field, a minor overstatement. Citation support is strong because the key claims trace to the retrieved Item 2.02 and Exhibit 99 text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02388535, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.022464750000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014206, "wall_seconds": 26.009187751000354, "api_seconds": 24.36108558199885, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 37539, "completion_tokens": 1324, "reasoning_tokens": 402, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017", "0000078003-25-000040", "0000078003-25-000042", "0000078003-25-000048", "0000078003-25-000052", "0000078003-25-000054", "0001225208-25-001142", "0001225208-25-001778", "0001225208-25-001805", "0001225208-25-002397", "0001225208-25-002399", "0001225208-25-002400", "0001225208-25-002401", "0001225208-25-002402", "0001225208-25-002412", "0001225208-25-002413", "0001225208-25-002612", "0001225208-25-002613" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/7c18f7f5f02b2b702ff094a6.json", "detail_js": "details/7c18f7f5f02b2b702ff094a6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7c18f7f5f02b2b702ff094a6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8526bcfa01914d7aa04743a505b1d3a4.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/78babb237b0846898b74a6283df30f25.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6976a573027830f3e8748451", "question_id": "Q081", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What event was disclosed by Pfizer Inc. under Item 2.02 of its Form 8-K filed in February 2025?", "reference": "Pfizer Inc. furnished its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2024 and 2025 financial guidance under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Pfizer disclosed that on February 4, 2025, it issued a press release announcing its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024. The filing identifies this under Item 2.02. (Form 8-K, file_stem **0000078003-25-000017**, file_id **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**; SQL passage evidence.)", "correctness": 75, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer matches the tool evidence: the 8-K (accession 0000078003-25-000017) reports under Item 2.02 that on February 4, 2025 Pfizer issued a press release announcing fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 financial results, furnished as Exhibit 99. The date, form, item, and accession are all correctly stated. The reference adds that the release covered 2025 financial guidance, but the retrieved Item 2.02 passage does not mention guidance, so the candidate's omission is not a factual error on the evidence shown, though it is less complete than the reference. Citation support is strong: the quoted Item 2.02 passage and the header data (filed date 20250204, 8-K form type, accession) directly back the claims made.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003484245, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002200345, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012839, "wall_seconds": 36.44908313199994, "api_seconds": 33.38443894199736, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 33975, "completion_tokens": 1456, "reasoning_tokens": 618, "cache_read_tokens": 10707, "excerpt_characters": 6800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017", "0000078003-25-000040", "0000078003-25-000042", "0000078003-25-000048", "0000078003-25-000052", "0000078003-25-000054", "0001225208-25-001142", "0001225208-25-001778", "0001225208-25-001805", "0001225208-25-002397", "0001225208-25-002399", "0001225208-25-002400", "0001225208-25-002401", "0001225208-25-002402", "0001225208-25-002412", "0001225208-25-002413", "0001225208-25-002612", "0001225208-25-002613" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6976a573027830f3e8748451.json", "detail_js": "details/6976a573027830f3e8748451.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6976a573027830f3e8748451.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e5255c8e5f74d0481a2e440ac650662.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bb8c52583051435e81c54c8b85153e73.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c2254f8242188e52a2c4d780", "question_id": "Q081", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What event was disclosed by Pfizer Inc. under Item 2.02 of its Form 8-K filed in February 2025?", "reference": "Pfizer Inc. furnished its financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2024 and 2025 financial guidance under Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Pfizer Inc. disclosed its **fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 financial results** under Item 2.02. The filing summary identifies Pfizer’s Form 8-K, filed February 4, 2025, and lists “Results of Operations and Financial Condition” (file_stem **0000078003-25-000017**, file_id **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**). The returned excerpt does not include the text of Item 2.02 itself, so the specific results event is not confirmed by the excerpt.", "correctness": 65, "citation_support": 55, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies the Item 2.02 disclosure as 'Results of Operations and Financial Condition' and gives the correct accession (0000078003-25-000017), form type (8-K), and filing date (February 4, 2025), all supported by the tool output. It also matches the reference on Q4 and full-year 2024 results. However, it omits the reference's 2025 financial guidance, and its bolded headline claim of Q4/FY2024 results is not supported by any retrieved text. The candidate concedes that the excerpt does not contain Item 2.02's text, so that specific is unverified. Citation support is therefore partial: the header facts are grounded, but the core event detail is not.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00285104, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0017659400000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010851, "wall_seconds": 31.940402009000536, "api_seconds": 28.840415894001126, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 26782, "completion_tokens": 1521, "reasoning_tokens": 697, "cache_read_tokens": 9174, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000078003-25-000017", "0000078003-25-000040", "0000078003-25-000042", "0000078003-25-000048", "0000078003-25-000052", "0000078003-25-000054", "0001225208-25-001142", "0001225208-25-001778", "0001225208-25-001805", "0001225208-25-002397", "0001225208-25-002399", "0001225208-25-002400", "0001225208-25-002401", "0001225208-25-002402", "0001225208-25-002412", "0001225208-25-002413", "0001225208-25-002612", "0001225208-25-002613" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c2254f8242188e52a2c4d780.json", "detail_js": "details/c2254f8242188e52a2c4d780.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c2254f8242188e52a2c4d780.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/51a478b8e6474bc68c8d683e9cedec20.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/32a85cfaa69b4014bf470d80df294a19.request.json" }, { "task_id": "32a3ae4b6addeddb694566d9", "question_id": "Q082", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Under what regulation and item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K disclosure?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its disclosure under Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Under Form 8-K rules and SEC disclosure regulations:\n\n* **Item Number:** **Item 7.01** (**Regulation FD Disclosure**)\n* **Regulation:** **Regulation FD** (Fair Disclosure)\n\n### Filing Context & Details\n* **Filer:** Starbucks Corporation (CIK: `0000829224`)\n* **Filing Date:** January 7, 2025\n* **SEC Accession Number / Filing ID:** `0000829224-25-000003` (recorded in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`)\n* **Item Heading:** *Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure*\n\n*(Note: Under General Instruction B.2 to Form 8-K, information reported pursuant to Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure is deemed \"furnished\" rather than \"filed\".)*", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly identifies Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) and the Regulation FD framing, which matches the reference's main point. However, it omits Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits), which the reference includes, so the answer is incomplete. It also cites accession 0000829224-25-000003, while the gold evidence points to 0000829224-25-000006. The tool outputs show that accession 000003 exists in the January 2025 data (char_count 8375), but every attempt to read its content failed with memory errors. Nothing in the tool evidence confirms its Item 7.01 content, its January 7 filing date, or the General Instruction B.2 note, which comes from outside knowledge. The only evidence for the item heading is the gold quote on accession 000006, so the candidate's specific accession and filing details are unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02420605, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02329125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009148, "wall_seconds": 31.349240571998962, "api_seconds": 29.298784293001518, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33063, "completion_tokens": 1428, "reasoning_tokens": 359, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/32a3ae4b6addeddb694566d9.json", "detail_js": "details/32a3ae4b6addeddb694566d9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/32a3ae4b6addeddb694566d9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f9211a5b4ccb4c6dbd166e4e2f5528f9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3263475ad8b445f9bcce6cfd50fa954b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b9475812a0624e004f226aa3", "question_id": "Q082", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Under what regulation and item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K disclosure?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its disclosure under Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Under **Regulation FD** and **Item 7.01** (**\"Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure\"**), Starbucks Corporation furnished its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K filing (Accession Number: `0000829224-25-000003`, CIK: `0000829224`). \n\nIn addition, the filing included **Item 9.01** (**Financial Statements and Exhibits**) furnishing the related exhibit (Exhibit 99.1 Press Release) pursuant to Item 7.01.", "correctness": 60, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The core answer matches the reference: Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01). However, the candidate gives accession 0000829224-25-000003, while the gold evidence points to 0000829224-25-000006. The tool outputs never confirm which accession is the January 7, 2025 8-K. The date-filtered query failed, and the read_filing and duckdb calls on -000003 hit malloc errors, so the accession was not verified. The tool output lists both accessions for CIK 829224 without form type or date. The Exhibit 99.1 press release claim has no tool support. Item numbers and the accession are asserted without supporting tool evidence, so citation support is very weak.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02199035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02115975, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008306, "wall_seconds": 30.517603070000405, "api_seconds": 28.460032276994752, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 29834, "completion_tokens": 1337, "reasoning_tokens": 435, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/b9475812a0624e004f226aa3.json", "detail_js": "details/b9475812a0624e004f226aa3.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b9475812a0624e004f226aa3.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3dfc54fffc804d83a53dcda2024aa452.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/758512034ba14e878b53fe7d17e20222.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d82ad3fa2edef0ec81461bf0", "question_id": "Q082", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Under what regulation and item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K disclosure?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its disclosure under Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Starbucks furnished the disclosure under **Regulation FD, Item 7.01** of Form 8-K.\n\nI located Starbucks’ January 2025 filings by CIK (`0000829224`), but the available text queries failed while decoding the filing, so I could not verify the item directly from its text.", "correctness": 60, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer, Regulation FD / Item 7.01, matches the reference and gold quote. It omits Item 9.01 (Financial Statements and Exhibits), which the reference includes, so the answer is incomplete. The tool evidence does not support the claim: the only retrieval that identified accession 0000829224-25-000006 returned metadata (file stem and character count), and every attempt to read its text failed with a memory error. Nothing in the tool output shows Item 7.01 or Regulation FD. The candidate does disclose that verification failed, but it still states the item as fact, so the citation support is weak.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0015431099999999999, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00088071, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0006624, "wall_seconds": 25.609153857998535, "api_seconds": 23.695272508997732, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 19168, "completion_tokens": 1028, "reasoning_tokens": 430, "cache_read_tokens": 10811, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/d82ad3fa2edef0ec81461bf0.json", "detail_js": "details/d82ad3fa2edef0ec81461bf0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d82ad3fa2edef0ec81461bf0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/71836b81004f473d9ed8e4402eeb7f3a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/48892a6375eb4285a6fbb50cb6d1b6a1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "aec23329645410bf24b398bb", "question_id": "Q082", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Under what regulation and item number did Starbucks Corporation furnish its January 7, 2025 Form 8-K disclosure?", "reference": "Starbucks Corporation furnished its disclosure under Regulation FD Disclosure (Item 7.01) and Financial Statements and Exhibits (Item 9.01).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The available evidence is insufficient to determine the regulation and item number. Metadata identifies Starbucks filing `0000829224-25-000003`, but attempts to read the filing text failed, so I cannot verify the disclosure details.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives Item 7.01 (Regulation FD Disclosure) for accession 0000829224-25-000006, and the reference also names Item 9.01. The candidate abstains, claiming the evidence is insufficient, so it does not give the correct regulation or item numbers and gets little correctness credit. Its abstention is not a fabrication and is consistent with the tool outputs, which show repeated ArrowMemoryError failures on read_filing and duckdb_query and no 8-K rows from search_filings. Its statements about the metadata listing accession 0000829224-25-000003 and the read failures are supported by the tool results. It does not claim the 000003 filing is the 8-K, and it never reaches the 000006 filing that the gold evidence cites. Citation support is therefore fairly high for accurately reporting what the tools returned, but the answer itself is missing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00233443, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0014296299999999999, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009048, "wall_seconds": 28.034598154999912, "api_seconds": 25.324311381998996, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 4, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 31455, "completion_tokens": 1286, "reasoning_tokens": 467, "cache_read_tokens": 18183, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000006" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000829224-25-000003", "0000829224-25-000006", "0000829224-25-000013", "0000829224-25-000014", "0001213900-25-006516", "0001213900-25-006523", "0001214659-25-001370" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/aec23329645410bf24b398bb.json", "detail_js": "details/aec23329645410bf24b398bb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/aec23329645410bf24b398bb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/549ceef43b004eba8feafc24a90e812f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7763e387a0dc45d7b36eed4431e8add5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0ae65eceddfd45d4fc192d28", "question_id": "Q083", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million) was contributed by its Digital Media segment ($15.86 billion)?", "reference": "Digital Media segment revenue ($15.86 billion = $15,860 million) represented 73.75% of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Adobe Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024 (`file_stem: 0000796343-25-000004`, `file_id: sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), total revenue was **$21,505 million** (Part II, Item 7, \"Revenue\"). \n\nUsing the figures provided in the prompt:\n- **Total Revenue**: $21,505 million (or $21.505 billion)\n- **Digital Media Segment Revenue**: $15.86 billion (or $15,860 million)\n\n### **Calculation**\n$$\\text{Percentage} = \\frac{\\$15,860\\text{ million}}{\\$21,505\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx 73.7503\\%$$\n\nRounded commonly:\n- To one decimal place: **73.8%**\n- To two decimal places: **73.75%**\n\n*(Note: Within the retrieved text from the 10-K, Digital Media subscription revenue specifically was $15,547 million, representing 72.29% of total revenue, with total Digital Media segment revenue across all revenue types reported at $15.86 billion).*", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 15,860 / 21,505 = 73.7503%, so 73.75% (and 73.8% to one decimal) matches the reference. Its units ($15.86B = $15,860M) and fiscal year end (November 29, 2024) are also correct. The total revenue of $21,505M and the subscription figure of $15,547M are supported by the tool output, and 72.29% checks out arithmetically. However, the $15.86B Digital Media segment total is not visible in the retrieved tool text. The candidate says it came from the prompt, which is honest, but it means that key input is not independently cited. The 'Part II, Item 7, Revenue' section label is plausible but not directly confirmed by the excerpts shown. The score is reduced for these gaps.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03852765, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03706425, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014634, "wall_seconds": 34.80970338500083, "api_seconds": 32.450917543003015, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 54823, "completion_tokens": 1846, "reasoning_tokens": 496, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6499, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0ae65eceddfd45d4fc192d28.json", "detail_js": "details/0ae65eceddfd45d4fc192d28.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0ae65eceddfd45d4fc192d28.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b3921cfaa2134708b9cf03353d976c84.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4c577ec8e67b45fe9d504b7ec97a01c8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d0968e12be2aa067113993f1", "question_id": "Q083", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million) was contributed by its Digital Media segment ($15.86 billion)?", "reference": "Digital Media segment revenue ($15.86 billion = $15,860 million) represented 73.75% of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the figures provided in the question:\n\n- **Total Revenue (FY 2024):** $21,505 million\n- **Digital Media Segment Revenue (FY 2024):** $15.86 billion = $15,860 million\n\n### Calculation:\n$$\\text{Percentage} = \\frac{\\$15,860\\text{ million}}{\\$21,505\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx 73.75\\%$$\n\nThus, the Digital Media segment contributed approximately **73.75%** of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue in fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 30, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic is correct: 15,860 / 21,505 × 100 = 73.75%, matching the reference, and it correctly converts $15.86 billion to $15,860 million. Its inputs come from the question itself, not from retrieved filing text. The tool evidence confirms only that the filing describes Digital Media as a reportable segment and that the percentage computes to 73.75029. It does not contain the $15.86 billion segment figure or the $21,505 million total revenue line that the gold evidence cites, and the candidate cites no filing text. The 30 reflects that the answer is arithmetically right but weakly supported by the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.038068, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.036415499999999996, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016525, "wall_seconds": 32.1475303469997, "api_seconds": 30.32366403800188, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58214, "completion_tokens": 1373, "reasoning_tokens": 384, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d0968e12be2aa067113993f1.json", "detail_js": "details/d0968e12be2aa067113993f1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d0968e12be2aa067113993f1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/624d23b63a944e3ab497a3ccead96da9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/96f27579f0704354b4a7557fc9038725.request.json" }, { "task_id": "34b8fcf7919029e40be86986", "question_id": "Q083", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million) was contributed by its Digital Media segment ($15.86 billion)?", "reference": "Digital Media segment revenue ($15.86 billion = $15,860 million) represented 73.75% of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Digital Media contributed **about 73.7%** of Adobe’s total revenue: \n\\[\n\\$15.86\\text{ billion} \\div \\$21.505\\text{ billion} \\times 100 \\approx 73.75\\%.\n\\]\n\nThe filing metadata confirms the issuer is Adobe Inc. (accession/CIK 0000796343; file stem `0000796343-25-000064`, `sfd-v1-2025-06.parquet`). The revenue amounts used above are the figures in your question.", "correctness": 85, "citation_support": 30, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The arithmetic is correct: 15.86 / 21.505 = 73.75%, matching the reference. The bolded headline says 'about 73.7%', which slightly conflicts with the 73.75% shown below it. The candidate's figures come only from the question, not from the filing. The tool evidence does not support the revenue numbers. The duckdb query for accession 796343 with year=2024 returned no rows, and the only filing inspected is an 8-K dated June 12, 2025 (0000796343-25-000064), not the FY2024 10-K cited in the gold evidence. The candidate's claim that the metadata confirms the issuer as Adobe Inc. (CIK 0000796343, file stem 0000796343-25-000064) is supported. The candidate does not acknowledge that it could not verify the $15.86B or $21,505M figures from the filing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00209216, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00106446, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010277, "wall_seconds": 22.31092700499903, "api_seconds": 21.85139415899539, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 20257, "completion_tokens": 1422, "reasoning_tokens": 626, "cache_read_tokens": 8481, "excerpt_characters": 1600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000064", "0000796343-25-000066", "0000796343-25-000069", "0000796343-25-000070", "0001628280-25-018275", "0001628280-25-018279", "0001628280-25-019447", "0001628280-25-019450", "0001628280-25-019451", "0001628280-25-019452", "0001628280-25-019457", "0001628280-25-020297", "0001628280-25-020298", "0001628280-25-020302", "0001628280-25-020303", "0001628280-25-020324", "0001628280-25-022694", "0001628280-25-026625", "0001972362-25-000339", "0001972362-25-000380" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/34b8fcf7919029e40be86986.json", "detail_js": "details/34b8fcf7919029e40be86986.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/34b8fcf7919029e40be86986.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3c2b4db5242942cba6d2e125246dd255.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/38dd2a614a124dcb9901ae38fcdc00d5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08", "question_id": "Q083", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million) was contributed by its Digital Media segment ($15.86 billion)?", "reference": "Digital Media segment revenue ($15.86 billion = $15,860 million) represented 73.75% of Adobe Inc.'s total revenue ($21,505 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Digital Media contributed **about 73.75%** of Adobe’s total FY2024 revenue:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{\\$15.86\\text{ billion}}{\\$21.505\\text{ billion}}\\times 100\n= 73.75\\%\n\\]\n\nThat is approximately **73.8%**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 5, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The arithmetic is correct: 15.86 / 21.505 = 0.73753, or 73.75%, which rounds to 73.8%. This matches the reference, and the candidate's units are consistent ($15.86B and $21.505B). Citation support is very weak. The tool evidence contains only file listings and accession lookups. Both search_filings calls returned zero rows, and the duckdb queries returned metadata, not the 10-K text. Neither the $15.86B Digital Media figure nor the $21,505M total revenue figure appears in any tool output, so the candidate's inputs are not grounded in the retrieved evidence, even though they happen to match the gold evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00216904, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00120234, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009667, "wall_seconds": 27.234016624001015, "api_seconds": 26.49272268900131, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 25816, "completion_tokens": 1432, "reasoning_tokens": 736, "cache_read_tokens": 13909, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08.json", "detail_js": "details/bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/bb4eb29fc94dded8a7ecfe08.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e4fec6498964da99693d4ff0a986893.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/50a724fc78d94945b9c6e862e8c9a0e8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "29c5201b447ae77e1e9c36e1", "question_id": "Q084", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "By what percentage did Intel Corporation's Intel Foundry external revenue decline in 2024 compared to 2023, and what factors caused the decline?", "reference": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, Item 7 – *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations: A Year in Review*):\n\n### Percentage Decline\n* **Intel Foundry external revenue decreased by 60%** in 2024 compared to 2023.\n\n### Factors Causing the Decline\nThe decline was driven by:\n1. **Lower traditional packaging services**\n2. **Lower equipment sales**", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states that Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% in 2024 versus 2023, and correctly names the two factors: lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales. The tool output contains the same sentence in the MD&A 'A Year in Review' passage, and the candidate cites the correct accession number and section. Minor deduction only because the candidate's cited section label is inferred from the surrounding MD&A text rather than a directly labeled heading in the retrieved chunk.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04196495, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04075575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012092, "wall_seconds": 33.392618312000195, "api_seconds": 31.69524456199906, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59493, "completion_tokens": 1388, "reasoning_tokens": 173, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000084", "0000050863-25-000087", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094", "0001127602-25-013177", "0001127602-25-013180", "0001127602-25-013723", "0001127602-25-013726", "0001127602-25-013732", "0001127602-25-013734", "0001127602-25-013735", "0001127602-25-013738", "0001127602-25-013739", "0001127602-25-013740", "0001127602-25-013741", "0001127602-25-013742", "0001127602-25-016494", "0001127602-25-016503", "0001127602-25-016513", "0001127602-25-016515" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/29c5201b447ae77e1e9c36e1.json", "detail_js": "details/29c5201b447ae77e1e9c36e1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/29c5201b447ae77e1e9c36e1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4d7044c07b964f719d7917ef5d6e3f60.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1a167e533afc4bb0adff0ba58f049b10.request.json" }, { "task_id": "205e385f4f21ba1d73c0c012", "question_id": "Q084", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "By what percentage did Intel Corporation's Intel Foundry external revenue decline in 2024 compared to 2023, and what factors caused the decline?", "reference": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Percentage Decline in External Revenue**\n* **Decline:** Intel Foundry external revenue **decreased 60%** in 2024 compared to 2023.\n\n---\n\n### **2. Factors Causing the Decline**\nIn the *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)* section (under both *\"A Year in Review\"* and *\"Consolidated Revenue - 2024 vs. 2023\"*):\n* The decline was driven by:\n 1. **Lower traditional packaging services**\n 2. **Lower equipment sales**\n\n*(Citations: `0000050863-25-000009`, character offsets ~73,078–85,078 and ~122,704–134,704: *\"Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023 due to lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.\"*)*", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: Intel Foundry external revenue fell 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales. The accession number and fiscal year are correct. The quoted sentence appears verbatim in both read_filing outputs (char ranges 73,078 to 85,078 and 122,704 to 134,704), and the two MD&A sections it cites ('A Year in Review' and 'Consolidated Revenue') are both shown in that evidence. Minor deductions: the offsets are described as approximate, and the answer adds some formatting beyond what was asked.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0548636, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.052965, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018986, "wall_seconds": 33.481034022999665, "api_seconds": 31.580611956998837, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 82421, "completion_tokens": 1437, "reasoning_tokens": 297, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/205e385f4f21ba1d73c0c012.json", "detail_js": "details/205e385f4f21ba1d73c0c012.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/205e385f4f21ba1d73c0c012.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cfe4cac803f242fcb3f0c273c140304d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7f59c7c7ee444a209c92dca8f2fba3a5.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d4ab7b5628f73acc11a8f269", "question_id": "Q084", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "By what percentage did Intel Corporation's Intel Foundry external revenue decline in 2024 compared to 2023, and what factors caused the decline?", "reference": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel Foundry external revenue declined **60%** in 2024 compared with 2023. Intel attributed the decline to **lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales**.\n\n**Source:** Intel Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, MD&A “A Year in Review” passage at approximately character offsets **74,073–74,260**.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 60% decline and its two causes (lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales) match the reference and the quoted MD&A sentence in the tool output. The accession 0000050863-25-000009 and file_id sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet are supported by the tool results. The sentence begins at strpos offset 74073, which matches the candidate's start offset. The end offset of about 74260 is not directly verified, since the tool never returned the sentence's end position, and the candidate hedged it as approximate. That keeps citation_support slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003978105, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002540105, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001438, "wall_seconds": 30.101550863999364, "api_seconds": 28.254441873998076, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 52168, "completion_tokens": 1262, "reasoning_tokens": 335, "cache_read_tokens": 24913, "excerpt_characters": 13550, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d4ab7b5628f73acc11a8f269.json", "detail_js": "details/d4ab7b5628f73acc11a8f269.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d4ab7b5628f73acc11a8f269.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5a3b8db88cfd483ea348b8ca1081f520.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c326fd3e0dc84c12934732c00ff5348e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d69d4a403a26664ab11a3d21", "question_id": "Q084", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "By what percentage did Intel Corporation's Intel Foundry external revenue decline in 2024 compared to 2023, and what factors caused the decline?", "reference": "Intel Foundry external revenue decreased 60% from 2023, driven by lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel said Intel Foundry **external revenue fell 60% in 2024 versus 2023**. It attributed the decline to **lower traditional packaging services revenue and lower equipment sales**.\n\nSource: Intel’s 2024 Form 10-K, file stem **0000050863-25-000009**, file ID **sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet**, character offsets **73,072–85,072**. The filing states the percentage change and reasons directly; it does not give the underlying revenue figures in this passage.", "correctness": 100, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core claims match the reference exactly: Intel Foundry external revenue fell 60% from 2023, attributed to lower traditional packaging services and lower equipment sales. The tool evidence supports these claims. The read_filing output for file sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet, accession 0000050863-25-000009, contains the sentence verbatim, and the returned offsets (73072:85072) match the candidate's cited range. The candidate also correctly notes that the passage gives no underlying revenue figures. The only minor gap is that the tool output's id field reports the window as 73086:85086 in the first read, while the cited range comes from the second read; the candidate's citation is still consistent with the evidence it relied on.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00329491, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00166601, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0016289, "wall_seconds": 24.72494834399913, "api_seconds": 24.162058122003145, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 40585, "completion_tokens": 963, "reasoning_tokens": 248, "cache_read_tokens": 16476, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007568", "0001127602-25-007570", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/d69d4a403a26664ab11a3d21.json", "detail_js": "details/d69d4a403a26664ab11a3d21.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d69d4a403a26664ab11a3d21.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a2d576ccb6ad465296ebdfa3eb327b06.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/468e399ce42849cea14f4195eafc5d67.request.json" }, { "task_id": "16eabc57b1b1d059d7272465", "question_id": "Q085", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Comcast Corporation's total revenue ($123,731 million) was absorbed by Programming and production expenses ($37,026 million)?", "reference": "Programming and production expenses absorbed 29.92% of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in 2024 ($37,026 million divided by $123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Comcast Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001166691-25-000011`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Reported Figures (Fiscal Year 2024)**\n* **Total Revenue:** $123,731 million\n* **Programming and Production Expenses:** $37,026 million\n\n---\n\n### **2. Calculation**\n$$\\text{Percentage} = \\frac{\\$37,026\\text{ million}}{\\$123,731\\text{ million}} \\times 100 \\approx 29.924594\\%$$\n\n* **Rounded to two decimal places:** **29.92%**\n* **Rounded to four decimal places:** **29.9246%**", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 82, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's 29.92% matches the reference, and the arithmetic (37,026 / 123,731 × 100 ≈ 29.9246%) is verified by the duckdb calculation output. The 37,026 programming and production figure is directly supported by the income statement snippet in the tool output. The $123,731 million revenue figure is not directly quoted in the tool evidence: the search for '123,731' returned 0, likely because the filing writes it without a comma. It is consistent with the snippet's total costs (100,434) plus operating income (23,297), but the candidate does not show that link, so citation support is good but not complete.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02924125, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02824125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001, "wall_seconds": 31.953957607998746, "api_seconds": 29.58158598600312, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 39820, "completion_tokens": 1567, "reasoning_tokens": 337, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/16eabc57b1b1d059d7272465.json", "detail_js": "details/16eabc57b1b1d059d7272465.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/16eabc57b1b1d059d7272465.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2a5876e8620c4398863395513ba0623d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2426e767ce6a4c2ca430f4dad9d78b2a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff", "question_id": "Q085", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Comcast Corporation's total revenue ($123,731 million) was absorbed by Programming and production expenses ($37,026 million)?", "reference": "Programming and production expenses absorbed 29.92% of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in 2024 ($37,026 million divided by $123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the figures provided in the question:\n\n- **Programming and production expenses:** $37,026 million\n- **Total revenue:** $123,731 million\n\n### Calculation:\n$$\\frac{\\$37,026\\text{ million}}{\\$123,731\\text{ million}} \\approx 0.2992459... \\times 100\\% \\approx 29.92\\%$$\n\nProgramming and production expenses absorbed approximately **29.92%** (or **29.9%**) of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in fiscal year 2024.\n\n*(Note: Due to tool budget constraints, full verification of the specific table in the 2024 Form 10-K filing was limited, but the calculation directly reflects the figures stated).*", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 10, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's arithmetic matches the reference: 37,026 / 123,731 rounds to 29.92%. Its intermediate decimal (0.2992459) is slightly off (the exact value is about 0.299239), but the final percentage is unaffected. The answer uses the question's figures without checking them against the filing, which the candidate discloses. The tool evidence does not support the inputs. The strpos check for '37,026' returned 0 (no match in the filing text), and read_filing for '123,731' returned found: false. The only confirmed hit was the 'Programming and production' label. The candidate cites no evidence and its disclaimer understates the problem, so citation support is low.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0280643, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0271155, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009488, "wall_seconds": 33.276729766001154, "api_seconds": 31.591429208998306, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 37737, "completion_tokens": 1581, "reasoning_tokens": 520, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached", "high_score_without_long_excerpt" ], "detail_json": "details/b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff.json", "detail_js": "details/b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b3b6f095d584e82ad5802fff.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2661ac9fc2d64d359f69a7b3f6639f90.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/295d8d2b33ed43f499b3a6d93d631b8f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1953d4a83dbd288a980090fb", "question_id": "Q085", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Comcast Corporation's total revenue ($123,731 million) was absorbed by Programming and production expenses ($37,026 million)?", "reference": "Programming and production expenses absorbed 29.92% of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in 2024 ($37,026 million divided by $123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Programming and production expenses absorbed **about 29.9%** of Comcast’s total revenue:\n\n\\[\n\\frac{\\$37{,}026\\text{ million}}{\\$123{,}731\\text{ million}}\\times100\n=29.93\\%\\approx\\mathbf{29.9\\%}.\n\\]\n\nThe amounts are in millions, so the units cancel in the calculation.", "correctness": 72, "citation_support": 8, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives 29.92% (37,026 / 123,731 = 0.29925). The candidate's approximate answer of about 29.9% matches at one decimal, but its intermediate value of 29.93% is an arithmetic error at the second decimal, and it does not match the reference's 29.92%. The candidate also gives no citation. The tool evidence does not support the figures: the searches for '37,026' and '123,731' returned position 0 in the filing text, meaning the strings were not found in that file, and the returned contexts were signature blocks. The only support for the inputs is the gold evidence row, which the candidate's own tool output does not show.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00243608, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00135488, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010812, "wall_seconds": 30.30184738999924, "api_seconds": 28.485520318001363, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32637, "completion_tokens": 1524, "reasoning_tokens": 618, "cache_read_tokens": 19173, "excerpt_characters": 2900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000006", "0001166691-25-000011", "0001193125-25-042517", "0001225208-25-000176", "0001225208-25-000177", "0001225208-25-000178", "0001225208-25-000185", "0001225208-25-000186", "0001225208-25-000187", "0001225208-25-000188", "0001225208-25-000189", "0001225208-25-000334", "0001225208-25-000338", "0001225208-25-000648", "0001225208-25-002535", "0001225208-25-002537", "0001225208-25-002549", "0001225208-25-002845", "0001225208-25-002849", "0001225208-25-003477" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/1953d4a83dbd288a980090fb.json", "detail_js": "details/1953d4a83dbd288a980090fb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1953d4a83dbd288a980090fb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6d7aa25111784c2d83819ae235caa8e8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc2196df1f0045d686707b42e2e5c504.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7b11e298d4fd9c82193ccb33", "question_id": "Q085", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Comcast Corporation's total revenue ($123,731 million) was absorbed by Programming and production expenses ($37,026 million)?", "reference": "Programming and production expenses absorbed 29.92% of Comcast Corporation's total revenue in 2024 ($37,026 million divided by $123,731 million).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Using the figures in your question: $37,026 million ÷ $123,731 million × 100 = **about 29.93%**. The provided tool results did not verify those figures against a filing.", "correctness": 60, "citation_support": 15, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The method is right: 37,026 ÷ 123,731 × 100 is the correct calculation. The stated result of 29.93% is wrong, though. The exact value is about 29.924%, which rounds to 29.92%, matching the reference. The candidate's figure is off in the second decimal place. On citation support, the tool evidence contains no matching filing rows: every search_filings call returned zero rows, and the duckdb_query call failed. The candidate correctly says the figures were not verified against a filing, but the number it gives is not supported by any tool output. The gold evidence line (Programming and production 37026 for 2024) was never retrieved by the tools.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0019818, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0012152, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007666, "wall_seconds": 23.42399734600076, "api_seconds": 20.27727020000202, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 14362, "completion_tokens": 1172, "reasoning_tokens": 514, "cache_read_tokens": 2290, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001166691-25-000011" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7b11e298d4fd9c82193ccb33.json", "detail_js": "details/7b11e298d4fd9c82193ccb33.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7b11e298d4fd9c82193ccb33.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/348dc779f4464b99a98a2f2d6012a69f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f489bf28c7d74b929ec5140ae0156c39.request.json" }, { "task_id": "056084b4ef07c21fd66063fc", "question_id": "Q086", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Citigroup Inc.'s effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024, and state its variance in basis points from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.", "reference": "Citigroup Inc.'s effective tax rate in 2024 was 24.70% (Income taxes of $4,211 million divided by Pre-tax income of $17,046 million), which is 370 basis points (3.70 percentage points) above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.00%.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Citigroup Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000831001-25-000067`, Note 9 \"Income Taxes\" under the section *Tax Rate*):\n\n### **1. Effective Income Tax Rate for Continuing Operations (2024)**\n* **Effective income tax rate:** **24.7%**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Variance from the U.S. Federal Statutory Tax Rate of 21%**\n* **U.S. federal statutory tax rate:** **21.0%**\n* **Difference in percentage points:** \n $$24.7\\% - 21.0\\% = +3.7\\% \\text{ (or } +3.7 \\text{ percentage points)}$$\n* **Variance in basis points:** \n $$3.7 \\times 100\\text{ bps} = \\mathbf{+370\\text{ basis points}}$$ (370 bps higher than the statutory rate)\n\n---\n\n### **Reconciliation Breakdown (in percentage points):**\n* **Federal statutory rate:** 21.0%\n* State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit: +1.6%\n* Non-U.S. income tax rate differential: +4.9%\n* Tax audit resolutions: +0.1%\n* Nondeductible FDIC premiums: +1.2%\n* Tax-advantaged investments: (4.2)%\n* Other, net: +0.1%\n* **Effective income tax rate:** **24.7%**", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's effective tax rate of 24.7% and its +370 bps variance from the 21% federal statutory rate match the reference (4,211 / 17,046 ≈ 24.70%; 3.70 pp = 370 bps). The reconciliation items (state taxes +1.6, non-U.S. differential +4.9, audit resolutions +0.1, FDIC +1.2, tax-advantaged investments (4.2), other +0.1) and the 27.3%/19.4% prior-year comparatives are all supported by the tool output's 'Tax Rate' reconciliation table. The candidate does not show the pre-tax income and tax expense inputs the reference uses, a minor completeness gap. The claim that this is 'Note 9 Income Taxes' is not verified anywhere in the tool evidence, which lowers citation support slightly.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02039255, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.01936275, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010298, "wall_seconds": 23.325122166001165, "api_seconds": 22.0969347070004, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 29085, "completion_tokens": 1406, "reasoning_tokens": 337, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000831001-25-000086", "0000831001-25-000103", "0000831001-25-000107", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/056084b4ef07c21fd66063fc.json", "detail_js": "details/056084b4ef07c21fd66063fc.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/056084b4ef07c21fd66063fc.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6ab03c538ced437490fae7ce3c190ec9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc4cb79ddae14a01a7ca19a0f861c122.request.json" }, { "task_id": "3eb53904f28c62b2b4a220af", "question_id": "Q086", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Citigroup Inc.'s effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024, and state its variance in basis points from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.", "reference": "Citigroup Inc.'s effective tax rate in 2024 was 24.70% (Income taxes of $4,211 million divided by Pre-tax income of $17,046 million), which is 370 basis points (3.70 percentage points) above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.00%.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Citigroup Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000831001-25-000067`, Note 9 *Income Taxes*, \"Tax Rate\" table, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### 1. Effective Income Tax Rate for Continuing Operations (2024)\n* **Effective income tax rate:** **24.7%**\n* **U.S. Federal statutory tax rate:** **21.0%**\n\n---\n\n### 2. Variance from the U.S. Federal Statutory Tax Rate\n$$\\text{Variance} = 24.7\\% - 21.0\\% = +3.7\\%$$\n\nConverting percentage points to basis points ($1\\% = 100\\text{ bps}$):\n$$3.7 \\times 100 = \\mathbf{+370\\text{ basis points}}$$\n\nThe effective income tax rate was **370 basis points higher** than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.0%.\n\n---\n\n### Reconciliation Breakdown (Variance Components):\n* **Federal statutory rate:** 21.0%\n* State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit: $+1.6\\%$ ($+160\\text{ bps}$)\n* Non-U.S. income tax rate differential: $+4.9\\%$ ($+490\\text{ bps}$)\n* Tax audit resolutions: $+0.1\\%$ ($+10\\text{ bps}$)\n* Nondeductible FDIC premiums: $+1.2\\%$ ($+120\\text{ bps}$)\n* Tax-advantaged investments: $-4.2\\%$ ($-420\\text{ bps}$)\n* Other, net: $+0.1\\%$ ($+10\\text{ bps}$)\n* **Effective income tax rate:** **24.7%** (Net variance: **$+3.7\\%$** or **$+370\\text{ bps}$**)", "correctness": 93, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the 2024 effective tax rate as 24.7% and the variance as +370 bps above the 21.0% federal statutory rate. Both match the reference (4,211 / 17,046 = 24.70%, so +370 bps) and the filing's rate reconciliation table in the tool output. The reconciliation components (1.6, 4.9, 0.1, 1.2, -4.2, 0.1) all match the tool evidence and sum to the stated net variance. The candidate does not show the pretax-income division the reference uses, which is a minor completeness gap. The citation to the file stem and the 'Tax Rate' table is supported by the read_filing output, but the labeling of it as 'Note 9 Income Taxes' is not shown in the retrieved evidence, so that detail is unsupported.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02634935, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02488125, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014681, "wall_seconds": 27.028509249999843, "api_seconds": 25.842904868002734, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 39876, "completion_tokens": 1596, "reasoning_tokens": 341, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0001145443-25-000075", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/3eb53904f28c62b2b4a220af.json", "detail_js": "details/3eb53904f28c62b2b4a220af.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/3eb53904f28c62b2b4a220af.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bc1ade50cdaa40938bc2edf6257405e8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7a02e490c0ed4b1dbed45707533196a0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9ec721f9a007a1c05d6b2f72", "question_id": "Q086", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "Calculate Citigroup Inc.'s effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024, and state its variance in basis points from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.", "reference": "Citigroup Inc.'s effective tax rate in 2024 was 24.70% (Income taxes of $4,211 million divided by Pre-tax income of $17,046 million), which is 370 basis points (3.70 percentage points) above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.00%.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Citigroup reported an **effective tax rate of 25% for 2024**. Compared with the **21% U.S. federal statutory rate**, that is **4 percentage points, or 400 basis points, higher**.\n\nThe 10-K describes this as Citigroup’s effective tax rate and says the change was largely driven by the geographic mix of earnings. **Source:** Citigroup Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000831001-25-000067`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, character offset 24,800 onward.", "correctness": 40, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference calculates 4,211 / 17,046 = 24.70%, a 370 bps variance from 21%. The candidate instead reports the rounded 25% figure from the MD&A narrative and gives a 400 bps variance. The question asks for a calculation, so the candidate's answer is off by 30 bps on the variance and does not show the arithmetic. The direction and approximate level are right, which earns partial credit. Citation support is strong: the tool output includes the sentence 'Citigroup's effective tax rate was 25% in 2024 versus 27%... largely driven by the geographic mix of earnings,' and the cited file stem, file ID, and offset 24,800 match the retrieved evidence. However, the candidate never retrieved the income tax and pre-tax income table that supports the exact calculation.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002761155, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001498155, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001263, "wall_seconds": 28.746094176998668, "api_seconds": 27.57121191400074, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35508, "completion_tokens": 1455, "reasoning_tokens": 431, "cache_read_tokens": 18723, "excerpt_characters": 5700, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001557", "0000950103-25-001733", "0000950103-25-001783", "0000950103-25-001858", "0000950103-25-001886", "0000950103-25-001978", "0000950103-25-002065", "0000950103-25-002107", "0000950103-25-002155", "0000950103-25-002302", "0000950103-25-002500", "0000950103-25-002592", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025100", "0001193125-25-036768", "0001193125-25-036777", "0001193125-25-036786", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/9ec721f9a007a1c05d6b2f72.json", "detail_js": "details/9ec721f9a007a1c05d6b2f72.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9ec721f9a007a1c05d6b2f72.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a9f7538039b24ac8b60a6b630d9c333c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ef81ad3f2afa4e6e9bfb9f13425a4b61.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b898fb9916012146b1b4f2fb", "question_id": "Q086", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "Calculate Citigroup Inc.'s effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024, and state its variance in basis points from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.", "reference": "Citigroup Inc.'s effective tax rate in 2024 was 24.70% (Income taxes of $4,211 million divided by Pre-tax income of $17,046 million), which is 370 basis points (3.70 percentage points) above the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.00%.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Citigroup reported a **25% effective income tax rate for continuing operations in 2024**. Compared with the 21% U.S. federal statutory rate, that is **4 percentage points, or 400 basis points, higher**.\n\n**Evidence:** Citigroup’s 2024 Results Summary states that its effective tax rate was 25% in 2024 (filing `0000831001-25-000067`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, characters 24,724–36,724). The variance is 25% − 21% = 4 percentage points = 400 basis points.", "correctness": 45, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate cites a real passage from the correct filing (0000831001-25-000067) stating Citigroup's 2024 effective tax rate was 25%, and its 4-point arithmetic follows from that rounded figure, so the citation supports the claim. However, the question asks for a calculated rate. The reference computes 4,211 / 17,046 = 24.70%, giving a variance of 370 bps. The candidate's 400 bps is off by 30 bps because it used the rounded narrative figure rather than computing from the income statement table. The 25% is approximately right, but the requested basis-point variance is wrong, and the candidate never retrieved or used the pre-tax income and tax expense figures.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002962625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001528325, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014343, "wall_seconds": 31.330945162999342, "api_seconds": 30.327565540999785, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 39278, "completion_tokens": 1233, "reasoning_tokens": 416, "cache_read_tokens": 19710, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000067" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000831001-25-000062", "0000831001-25-000067", "0000950103-25-000122", "0000950103-25-000545", "0000950103-25-000761", "0000950103-25-000864", "0000950103-25-000898", "0000950103-25-000963", "0000950103-25-001046", "0000950103-25-001177", "0000950103-25-001783", "0000950103-25-001858", "0001193125-25-020492", "0001193125-25-021707", "0001193125-25-025100", "0001193125-25-036768", "0001193125-25-036777", "0001193125-25-036786", "0001918704-25-000104", "0001918704-25-000140", "0001918704-25-000263", "0001918704-25-000460", "0001918704-25-000742", "0001918704-25-000831", "0001918704-25-000924", "0001918704-25-000938", "0001918704-25-000978", "0001918704-25-001166", "0001918704-25-001194", "0001918704-25-001329" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation" ], "detail_json": "details/b898fb9916012146b1b4f2fb.json", "detail_js": "details/b898fb9916012146b1b4f2fb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b898fb9916012146b1b4f2fb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7b77e40d923d4445b511f458baf07815.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/952af85bd9e948f3a0ed58508284d81b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f319e60071a51f182fce5459", "question_id": "Q087", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.'s operating expense ratio in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Total expenses divided by Total revenues?", "reference": "Innovative Industrial Properties recorded an operating expense ratio of 44.32% in 2024, calculated as Total expenses ($136,723 thousand) divided by Total revenues ($308,517 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the queries performed within the available tool budget:\n\nThe relevant Form 10-K for **Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.** for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 was identified (Accession / `file_stem`: `0001558370-25-001322`, CIK: `0001677576`, in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). \n\nHowever, because the tool budget was exhausted before reading the table containing the exact values for **Total expenses** and **Total revenues** from the Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal year 2024, the evidence returned is insufficient to compute the operating expense ratio.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: total revenues of $308,517K and total expenses of $136,723K yield about 44.32%. The candidate abstained and gave no ratio, no expense figure, and no revenue figure. Abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable, so correctness is 0. The candidate's tool evidence does support its identification claims: accession 0001558370-25-001322, CIK 0001677576, and the 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. The tool output also confirms the statement locations ('Total revenues' and 'Total expenses' appear in the file), but the candidate never retrieved the values, so its statement that the evidence was insufficient is accurate about what it obtained. The gold quote for total revenues was available in the filing but was not read.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04080625, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03939525, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001411, "wall_seconds": 35.42926315099976, "api_seconds": 33.32794693100186, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58567, "completion_tokens": 1614, "reasoning_tokens": 427, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 5500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001558370-25-001322" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000000000-25-001179", "0001104659-25-001336", "0001104659-25-007410", "0001104659-25-011519", "0001104659-25-015271", "0001104659-25-016184", "0001104659-25-017454", "0001104659-25-017458", "0001104659-25-024029", "0001104659-25-024499", "0001104659-25-041241", "0001104659-25-041267", "0001104659-25-045638", "0001415889-25-000626", "0001415889-25-000628", "0001415889-25-000809", "0001415889-25-005377", "0001415889-25-005389", "0001415889-25-005391", "0001415889-25-005421", "0001415889-25-006856", "0001558370-25-001322", "0001628280-25-023920", "0001949846-25-000082" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/f319e60071a51f182fce5459.json", "detail_js": "details/f319e60071a51f182fce5459.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f319e60071a51f182fce5459.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a950d04a48de4420aaf5d97f5508989a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6c0f0b06fb0642d48d9f739ef5f8f05d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "461932050b54a6e93dbd47e4", "question_id": "Q087", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.'s operating expense ratio in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Total expenses divided by Total revenues?", "reference": "Innovative Industrial Properties recorded an operating expense ratio of 44.32% in 2024, calculated as Total expenses ($136,723 thousand) divided by Total revenues ($308,517 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings located within the tool budget, the relevant 2024 Form 10-K for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (CIK `0001677576`, file stem `0001558370-25-001322` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`) was identified; however, the tool budget was exhausted before the Consolidated Statements of Operations table displaying the exact figures for Total expenses and Total revenues for fiscal year 2024 could be retrieved.\n\nTherefore, the available evidence is insufficient to calculate the operating expense ratio for fiscal year 2024.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence gives Total revenues of 308,517 thousand for 2024, and the reference computes 136,723 / 308,517 ≈ 44.32%. The candidate abstains and gives no ratio, so it fails the core task. Missing evidence does not excuse this, because the question is answerable and the abstention is not justified by an unanswerable reference. The candidate's claims are partly supported by the tool trace: the filing identity (CIK 0001677576, accession 0001558370-25-001322) appears in the duckdb output, and the statement-of-operations table was not retrieved. The claim that the 'tool budget was exhausted' is not explicitly shown in the trace, which ends with a binder error rather than a budget message. The candidate also does not cite the revenue figure that the trace did surface in its own tool results, so its support is only partial.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03207365, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03075675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013169, "wall_seconds": 35.019103570999505, "api_seconds": 32.461007656998845, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46778, "completion_tokens": 1480, "reasoning_tokens": 424, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001558370-25-001322" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-015271", "0001104659-25-016184", "0001104659-25-017454", "0001558370-25-001322" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/461932050b54a6e93dbd47e4.json", "detail_js": "details/461932050b54a6e93dbd47e4.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/461932050b54a6e93dbd47e4.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e4aca18224874bf38a5c6928d103c93f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f29d76fcead24a1ea8a50b97d4e4f614.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9c9e22bcde869926d4566ffa", "question_id": "Q087", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.'s operating expense ratio in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Total expenses divided by Total revenues?", "reference": "Innovative Industrial Properties recorded an operating expense ratio of 44.32% in 2024, calculated as Total expenses ($136,723 thousand) divided by Total revenues ($308,517 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t calculate the ratio from the available evidence. The filing I checked identifies the company as **CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund**, not Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc., so it does not provide the requested company’s FY2024 revenues or expenses. \n**Source checked:** file_stem `0001752724-25-042103`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet` (filing summary identifies the registrant).", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Total expenses of $136,723K divided by Total revenues of $308,517K gives about 44.32%, and the gold evidence (accession 0001558370-25-001322, Total revenues 308517) supports the revenue figure. The candidate abstained and did not produce the ratio or any expense figure, so it misses the core answer. Its abstention is not justified because the reference is answerable. Its tool searches used CIK 0001437749, which returned nothing, and then CIK 0001678124, which is CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund. It never queried the Innovative Industrial Properties filing. The candidate's statement that the checked file belongs to CION is supported by the tool output (the filing summary names CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund), so its citation is accurate, but the cited evidence is for a different company and does not support its conclusion that the requested data is unavailable.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003102395, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001734895, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013675, "wall_seconds": 32.66655279800034, "api_seconds": 31.53338140699816, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41955, "completion_tokens": 1819, "reasoning_tokens": 692, "cache_read_tokens": 24267, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001558370-25-001322" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-006520", "0001085146-25-002925", "0001104659-25-000253", "0001104659-25-004153", "0001104659-25-014268", "0001104659-25-015720", "0001104659-25-021413", "0001104659-25-021564", "0001104659-25-029903", "0001104659-25-032192", "0001104659-25-035805", "0001104659-25-041322", "0001104659-25-042651", "0001104659-25-049497", "0001104659-25-050401", "0001104659-25-055491", "0001104659-25-057088", "0001752724-25-042103", "0001752724-25-055177", "0001752724-25-117045" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/9c9e22bcde869926d4566ffa.json", "detail_js": "details/9c9e22bcde869926d4566ffa.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9c9e22bcde869926d4566ffa.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/40d3f9be80494de284dca1ada5d0e016.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7e9bc01ab6054561969e3407e0efc649.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e56a5a13519b0a525faf6a99", "question_id": "Q087", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.'s operating expense ratio in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Total expenses divided by Total revenues?", "reference": "Innovative Industrial Properties recorded an operating expense ratio of 44.32% in 2024, calculated as Total expenses ($136,723 thousand) divided by Total revenues ($308,517 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I couldn’t establish the FY2024 operating expense ratio from the available evidence. The CIK I checked (0001673481) identifies Lottery.com—not Innovative Industrial Properties—in the filing I inspected, so it cannot support an answer for IIPR. I would need the correct issuer’s FY2024 filing and its reported Total expenses and Total revenues to calculate the ratio.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 65, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a computed answer (44.32% from Total expenses $136,723K / Total revenues $308,517K) and the gold evidence supports the revenue figure, so the question is answerable. The candidate abstains and provides no ratio, so it fails the core task; abstention earns no correctness credit here. Citation support is partial: the tool output does show CIK 0001673481 belongs to Lottery.com Inc. (8-K header), so that identification is grounded. However, the candidate's search for IIPR filings was incomplete (500-row scans with next_row not reached, and the IIPR accession 0001558370-25-001322 was never retrieved), so the claim that the evidence cannot support an IIPR answer is overstated. The candidate also never shows the IIPR filing was absent from the corpus.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0026088599999999997, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00141606, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011928, "wall_seconds": 36.66718741399927, "api_seconds": 34.78840913300155, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35224, "completion_tokens": 1679, "reasoning_tokens": 788, "cache_read_tokens": 21066, "excerpt_characters": 1200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001558370-25-001322" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001493152-25-002432", "0001493152-25-002444", "0001493152-25-002842", "0001493152-25-004309", "0001493152-25-005253", "0001493152-25-005599", "0001493152-25-005615", "0001493152-25-005681", "0001493152-25-005836", "0001493152-25-006075", "0001493152-25-007990", "0001493152-25-008391", "0001493152-25-008823", "0001493152-25-009473", "0001493152-25-009806", "0001641172-25-000745", "0001949846-25-000014", "0001949846-25-000069", "0001949846-25-000070", "0001972481-25-000022" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/e56a5a13519b0a525faf6a99.json", "detail_js": "details/e56a5a13519b0a525faf6a99.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e56a5a13519b0a525faf6a99.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c2334f820b21441fb2814fdb30d1e502.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f73fcebdc3f54042babe0d268aee6d93.request.json" }, { "task_id": "0a0644921ded167414f2e401", "question_id": "Q088", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "For Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, what were the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024?", "reference": "Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF incurred $770 thousand in gross expenses (consisting entirely of the related-party Sponsor's Fee) from July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from the available datasets within the allocated tool budget, the relevant filing (such as the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2024) for **Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF** could not be identified or accessed. Consequently, there is **insufficient evidence** to determine the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence shows Sponsor's Fee (related party) of 770 and gross expenses of 770 for the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF period. The candidate instead abstained with 'insufficient evidence.' Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which it is not here, so correctness is 0. The candidate's abstention is faithful to its tool outputs: every search failed (binder error, out-of-memory errors) or returned an unrelated Form D filing from Sauz Inc., so none of its cited evidence supports the 770 figure. Its statement that the filing could not be located is accurate to the tool results, so citation_support is scored high.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02547835, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02459775, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0008806, "wall_seconds": 29.280527856000845, "api_seconds": 26.536180041006446, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 36863, "completion_tokens": 948, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-029407" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0002021644-25-000001" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/0a0644921ded167414f2e401.json", "detail_js": "details/0a0644921ded167414f2e401.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/0a0644921ded167414f2e401.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1de6f9e21e444b4cb1038004f724c0ee.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d3d42310616d4ed99925ca1e89828b71.request.json" }, { "task_id": "fc38f5c7b0bdff40a20e3ade", "question_id": "Q088", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, what were the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024?", "reference": "Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF incurred $770 thousand in gross expenses (consisting entirely of the related-party Sponsor's Fee) from July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches and queries conducted within the available tool budget, the relevant annual report (Form 10-K) or financial statements for **Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF** covering the period from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024 could not be located or retrieved before the tool budget was exhausted.\n\nTherefore, the available evidence is insufficient to state the total gross expenses incurred by Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF for that period.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 100, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: gross expenses were $770 thousand (Sponsor's Fee, related party) for July 23 to December 31, 2024, supported by the gold evidence in the Statements of Operations. The candidate instead abstained, saying the filing could not be located before the tool budget ran out. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which it is not here, so correctness is 0. The candidate's abstention is honest and its tool evidence shows only failed or empty searches, none of which contradict the answer, so its statement that the data could not be retrieved is supported, giving citation_support 100.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0241082, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.023451, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0006572, "wall_seconds": 30.299428326999987, "api_seconds": 28.030443825000475, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 33300, "completion_tokens": 908, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-029407" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/fc38f5c7b0bdff40a20e3ade.json", "detail_js": "details/fc38f5c7b0bdff40a20e3ade.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/fc38f5c7b0bdff40a20e3ade.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f99c6da421e94ba9ba0ab537d9cc6430.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/61d93fa8614e4f989e22a353b1137644.request.json" }, { "task_id": "053b5708806734f5b9355451", "question_id": "Q088", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "For Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, what were the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024?", "reference": "Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF incurred $770 thousand in gross expenses (consisting entirely of the related-party Sponsor's Fee) from July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the amount from the available evidence. The schema inspection identified the filing fields, but I did not locate and verify a filing for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, so I can’t cite a filing or report a reliable total gross expenses figure.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: the gold evidence shows Gross expenses of 770 (Sponsor's Fee, related party) for the period. The candidate abstained, so it provides no figure and does not meet the correctness standard for an answerable question. Its abstention is not justified by the reference, and the failed DuckDB query (a syntax error from a stray '?') does not excuse it. The candidate's stated claims are supported by the tool evidence: the schema inspection ran, and the only query errored, so no filing was located. It is honest about that gap, which earns the high citation_support score.", "known_cost_usd": 0.001371665, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0008551650000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0005165, "wall_seconds": 20.586618344999806, "api_seconds": 20.36788596200131, "api_attempts": 4, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 3, "tool_requested": 2, "tool_processed": 2, "tool_dispatched": 2, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 1, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 8658, "completion_tokens": 1257, "reasoning_tokens": 840, "cache_read_tokens": 2139, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-029407" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/053b5708806734f5b9355451.json", "detail_js": "details/053b5708806734f5b9355451.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/053b5708806734f5b9355451.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7e247825facf49f8be633ed98f485503.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/824353611e3b4221ab0c950a07d73919.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b3d1b3858d356a01161c80b0", "question_id": "Q088", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "For Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF, what were the total gross expenses incurred from commencement of operations on July 23, 2024 through December 31, 2024?", "reference": "Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF incurred $770 thousand in gross expenses (consisting entirely of the related-party Sponsor's Fee) from July 23, 2024 to December 31, 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the total gross expenses from the returned evidence. The searches did not identify a filing, and no filing text or expense figures were retrieved.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is answerable: $770 thousand in gross expenses, all from the related-party Sponsor's Fee, for July 23 to December 31, 2024. The candidate abstained and gave no figure, so it misses the core answer; abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which this one is. The abstention is honest and the candidate's claims match the tool outputs: every search_filings call returned zero rows, and the scans were incomplete (complete: false). The gold evidence (accession 0000950170-25-029407) never appeared in the tool evidence, so the candidate's inability to answer is supported, though the search strategy was limited (company-name filters, 500-row windows, and no search on the accession or on expense terms).", "known_cost_usd": 0.0021298050000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0013509050000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0007789, "wall_seconds": 29.319632689001082, "api_seconds": 26.49113211200165, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 20608, "completion_tokens": 1284, "reasoning_tokens": 582, "cache_read_tokens": 8268, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-029407" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b3d1b3858d356a01161c80b0.json", "detail_js": "details/b3d1b3858d356a01161c80b0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b3d1b3858d356a01161c80b0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5d6d5830ff164d6bae3c6cf0f648f0a6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a0615ae93419432db2106e5413913ab4.request.json" }, { "task_id": "52452178256480051a95ec00", "question_id": "Q089", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Income from operations divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin was 4.18% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Income from operations ($58,906 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the evidence retrieved from the available dataset, the filings for Utz Brands, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 were not located within the allocated query budget. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to provide Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage, Income from operations, or Net sales for that period.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: Income from operations of $58,906K divided by Net sales of $1,409,281K gives 4.18%, and the gold evidence supports both figures. The candidate abstains and provides no margin, operating income, or net sales figure, so it fails the question. Abstention earns full correctness only when the reference is unanswerable, which it is not. The candidate's statement that the filings were not located is supported by the tool outputs: the Utz-filtered queries returned no Utz rows, several queries hit binder or out-of-memory errors, and the only retrieved filing was an unrelated KE Holdings 6-K. That makes the abstention claim well grounded, though it does not excuse the missing answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0276319, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0265635, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010684, "wall_seconds": 30.16102246599985, "api_seconds": 29.001743348999298, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 3, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 38907, "completion_tokens": 1439, "reasoning_tokens": 345, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001104659-25-008405", "0001104659-25-010294", "0001104659-25-012473", "0001104659-25-019774", "0001104659-25-021175", "0001104659-25-021477", "0001104659-25-021989", "0001104659-25-025377", "0001104659-25-026805", "0001104659-25-028937", "0001958244-25-001865" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/52452178256480051a95ec00.json", "detail_js": "details/52452178256480051a95ec00.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/52452178256480051a95ec00.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/30173ab04fdb426e9847ee8b9a96ffd5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a592f564afa041c8aea8dac4a998d52b.request.json" }, { "task_id": "aa5b53af45c6810e59c3908c", "question_id": "Q089", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Income from operations divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin was 4.18% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Income from operations ($58,906 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the searches conducted within the available filing datasets and within the allocated tool budget, Utz Brands, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024 was not located in the searched portions of the files. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to provide the exact figures for Income from operations, Net sales, and the operating income margin percentage for Utz Brands, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a complete answer: operating margin of 4.18%, from Income from operations of $58,906K divided by Net sales of $1,409,281K. The gold evidence supports the operating income figure. The candidate did not answer and abstained, saying the Utz 10-K was not found in the searched portions. This is not a wrong figure, but the reference is answerable, so abstention earns no correctness credit. Citation support is fairly high because the tool outputs do show no Utz rows were returned. The searches were incomplete (complete: false, and a search for 'Utz' was run on only one file), and the candidate's hedge to 'searched portions' is accurate. The one tool call that was not an error (search on 'Utz Brands' in the 2025-02 file) returned nothing, but the candidate did not check the 2025-03 file for the Utz 10-K, and the reference evidence was never retrieved.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0347218, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.033303, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014188, "wall_seconds": 32.396903779999775, "api_seconds": 30.526916169003016, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 51877, "completion_tokens": 1343, "reasoning_tokens": 445, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001437749-25-006838" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/aa5b53af45c6810e59c3908c.json", "detail_js": "details/aa5b53af45c6810e59c3908c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/aa5b53af45c6810e59c3908c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8ef7fb7e79c24e02b2d1de38e575f43e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8d35006a6ef345e182b6e26fd18c6ae6.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2e16201faf506aad76a9400a", "question_id": "Q089", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Income from operations divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin was 4.18% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Income from operations ($58,906 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t calculate the margin from the returned evidence: it confirms the filing is Utz Brands’ 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, but does not provide the required Income from operations and Net sales amounts.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a 4.18% operating margin from Income from operations ($58,906K) and Net sales ($1,409,281K), so the question is answerable. The candidate abstains and gives no margin, which is incomplete and not correct. Abstention earns full credit only when the reference is unanswerable, so correctness is low. The tool outputs do support the candidate's narrower claims: they identify the 10-K for the period ending 20241229 (accession 0001739566-25-000053) and locate the 'net sales' and 'income from operations' text, but they never return the income statement figures. The candidate's statement that the returned evidence lacks the required amounts is therefore accurate. The gold quote does not appear in the tool output, so the candidate's failure to retrieve it reflects a retrieval gap rather than a misreading of the evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003778785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002385485, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013933, "wall_seconds": 38.70664212600059, "api_seconds": 35.539239879997695, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 48746, "completion_tokens": 1797, "reasoning_tokens": 774, "cache_read_tokens": 25716, "excerpt_characters": 6000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000019617-25-000261", "0000950170-25-020547", "0000950170-25-038342", "0000950170-25-038349", "0001104659-25-003800", "0001104659-25-003803", "0001104659-25-005592", "0001104659-25-012147", "0001104659-25-012593", "0001739566-25-000014", "0001739566-25-000016", "0001739566-25-000018", "0001739566-25-000020", "0001739566-25-000022", "0001739566-25-000024", "0001739566-25-000026", "0001739566-25-000028", "0001739566-25-000030", "0001739566-25-000032", "0001739566-25-000034", "0001739566-25-000036", "0001739566-25-000039", "0001739566-25-000053", "0001739566-25-000111" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/2e16201faf506aad76a9400a.json", "detail_js": "details/2e16201faf506aad76a9400a.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2e16201faf506aad76a9400a.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bd7d380039274182ae295abbd8951645.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9cb9db675f644133be368b1851b3a446.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d50a54d04d327afc290d582f", "question_id": "Q089", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What was Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin percentage for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024, calculated as Income from operations divided by Net sales?", "reference": "Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating income margin was 4.18% in fiscal year 2024, calculated as Income from operations ($58,906 thousand) divided by Net sales ($1,409,281 thousand).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "I can’t determine the margin from the returned evidence. The metadata lookup found no Utz filing, and the filing searches did not return a matching 10-K or its financial figures. Without Income from operations and Net sales, I can’t calculate or verify the percentage.", "correctness": 0, "citation_support": 45, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives a specific answer (4.18%, from Income from operations of $58,906K and Net sales of $1,409,281K), so abstention is only fully correct if the question is unanswerable, and it is answerable from the gold evidence. The candidate provides no figures or margin, so it earns no correctness credit. On citation support, the tool outputs show empty query and search results, but the searches were incomplete (for example, 'complete: false' with 200 or 500 rows scanned on some files), and the sixth search hit a budget error. The candidate's statement that the metadata lookup and searches 'found no Utz filing' overstates what the incomplete searches established, so the claim is only partly supported by the evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00233361, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0014210100000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009126, "wall_seconds": 28.41803835399878, "api_seconds": 25.38605754300079, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 9, "tool_processed": 9, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 1, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 20923, "completion_tokens": 1542, "reasoning_tokens": 632, "cache_read_tokens": 7816, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001739566-25-000053" ], "observed_filing_ids": [], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d50a54d04d327afc290d582f.json", "detail_js": "details/d50a54d04d327afc290d582f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d50a54d04d327afc290d582f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1d7d8f80fd844b6fab8c7254ff02ae62.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/519f9085da614913836b2939ab2ae59e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "eeeaeca9a31dd32f9d7f942e", "question_id": "Q090", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue ($3,071,663 thousand) was contributed by Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "Travel Solutions contributed 89.36% ($2,744,844 thousand) and Hospitality Solutions contributed 10.64% ($326,819 thousand) of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Sabre Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (`file_stem`: **`0001597033-25-000027`**, `file_id`: **`sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`**, *Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Segment Results of Operations*), the segment revenue breakdown for fiscal year 2024 is as follows:\n\n- **Travel Solutions Revenue:** $2,744,844 thousand\n- **Hospitality Solutions Revenue:** $326,819 thousand\n- **Total Segment Revenue:** $3,071,663 thousand\n\n---\n\n### **Percentage Contributions to Total Segment Revenue:**\n\n1. **Travel Solutions:**\n $$\\frac{2,744,844}{3,071,663} \\approx 89.3602\\% \\quad (\\approx 89.36\\%)$$\n\n2. **Hospitality Solutions:**\n $$\\frac{326,819}{3,071,663} \\approx 10.6398\\% \\quad (\\approx 10.64\\%)$$\n\n*(Note: Total segment revenue before intersegment eliminations of $(42,098) thousand is $3,071,663 thousand; total consolidated revenue is $3,029,565 thousand.)*", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 94, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool output: Travel Solutions $2,744,844K (89.36%), Hospitality Solutions $326,819K (10.64%), and total segment revenue $3,071,663K. Its arithmetic checks out (2,744,844/3,071,663 ≈ 89.36%; 326,819/3,071,663 ≈ 10.64%). It also correctly reports eliminations of $(42,098)K and consolidated revenue of $3,029,565K, both shown in the retrieved table. The citation to accession 0001597033-25-000027, file sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and Item 7 Segment Results is supported by the tool outputs. Minor deduction: the tool evidence does not explicitly label the filing as a 10-K, though the certification text references Form 10-K. The first DuckDB query failed with a binder error, which the candidate did not mention, but this does not affect the answer.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0247197, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0237225, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0009972, "wall_seconds": 31.573807631000818, "api_seconds": 29.350230117001047, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33677, "completion_tokens": 1585, "reasoning_tokens": 284, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000027" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/eeeaeca9a31dd32f9d7f942e.json", "detail_js": "details/eeeaeca9a31dd32f9d7f942e.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/eeeaeca9a31dd32f9d7f942e.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e2bd1b367a5f427abc3a61edec8ec0ba.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e249325e3bbb4a56be7b8184aea50c8a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "da0a1a0aea84d9897f2f0556", "question_id": "Q090", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue ($3,071,663 thousand) was contributed by Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "Travel Solutions contributed 89.36% ($2,744,844 thousand) and Hospitality Solutions contributed 10.64% ($326,819 thousand) of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the filings inspected within the allocated tool budget:\n\n1. **Company & Filing Identified**:\n - Company: **Sabre Corporation** (CIK: `0001597033`)\n - Filing: Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (File stem: `0001597033-25-000027`, Parquet file: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`).\n\n2. **Segments Identified**:\n - The filing confirms Sabre Corporation operates in two business segments:\n - **Travel Solutions**\n - **Hospitality Solutions**\n - Financial segment data is reported under **Note 19. Segment Information** in Item 8.\n\n3. **Segment Revenue Breakdown**:\n - The tool budget was exhausted before locating and retrieving the specific dollar amounts for Travel Solutions revenue and Hospitality Solutions revenue within Note 19 / segment reporting of the 10-K. \n\nConsequently, the evidence retrieved is **insufficient** to compute the exact percentage contribution of Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions to the total segment revenue of $3,071,663 thousand.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the filing's segment table gives Travel Solutions $2,744,844K and Hospitality Solutions $326,819K of $3,071,663K total, which yields 89.36% and 10.64%. The candidate abstained and gave no percentages or dollar amounts, so it misses the core answer. Abstention earns full credit only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. It does correctly identify the company, CIK, accession number, the two segments, and the Note 19 reference, which the tool outputs support. The claim that the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 is not directly shown in the tool evidence. The candidate also never reached the segment table that the tool results show was present in the filing, and it did not use the read_filing offsets to search for the table's figures. Citation support is good for what it asserts, but those assertions do not answer the question.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03860485, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03677925, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0018256, "wall_seconds": 34.97198571700028, "api_seconds": 32.84049783200135, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 59060, "completion_tokens": 1647, "reasoning_tokens": 375, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/da0a1a0aea84d9897f2f0556.json", "detail_js": "details/da0a1a0aea84d9897f2f0556.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/da0a1a0aea84d9897f2f0556.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/086c5bb6ae4d466fb0c4faf1f58c6f8c.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/95c8ba699bb644ec94249a01b21b5990.request.json" }, { "task_id": "f994d8118f2493d5b3fc88e0", "question_id": "Q090", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue ($3,071,663 thousand) was contributed by Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "Travel Solutions contributed 89.36% ($2,744,844 thousand) and Hospitality Solutions contributed 10.64% ($326,819 thousand) of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Sabre’s FY2024 segment revenues were **$2,744,844 thousand for Travel Solutions** and **$326,819 thousand for Hospitality Solutions**. Together, they equal the stated total of **$3,071,663 thousand**.\n\n- **Travel Solutions:** $2,744,844 ÷ $3,071,663 × 100 = **89.36%**\n- **Hospitality Solutions:** $326,819 ÷ $3,071,663 × 100 = **10.64%**\n\nSource: Sabre Corporation 2024 Form 10-K, accession/file_stem `0001597033-25-000027`, `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; segment-information table in the excerpt returned by the text query.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 88, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on both segment amounts ($2,744,844K and $326,819K) and both percentages (89.36% and 10.64%). The arithmetic checks out: 2,744,844 + 326,819 = 3,071,663, and the tool's DuckDB computation gives 89.36% and 10.64%. The segment amounts are directly supported by the Note 19 table in the tool output. The $3,071,663K total appears in the question and gold MD&A table but not in the retrieved excerpt, so that figure is only partly backed by the tool evidence. The candidate also does not mention that the Note 19 total column shows $3,029,565K after eliminations, which could confuse a reader comparing tables. These gaps keep the score just below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0028085999999999996, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0015209, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012877, "wall_seconds": 30.924859594000736, "api_seconds": 29.33807758399962, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 35949, "completion_tokens": 1721, "reasoning_tokens": 706, "cache_read_tokens": 20050, "excerpt_characters": 4000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/f994d8118f2493d5b3fc88e0.json", "detail_js": "details/f994d8118f2493d5b3fc88e0.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/f994d8118f2493d5b3fc88e0.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2d9d2cb26178473783465d64273e803f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/941a13568bd04fe38f1ef8a0b7063d65.request.json" }, { "task_id": "38da79c72f2f667f8a64b613", "question_id": "Q090", "difficulty": "very_hard", "answer_type": "percentage", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "In fiscal year 2024, what percentage of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue ($3,071,663 thousand) was contributed by Travel Solutions versus Hospitality Solutions?", "reference": "Travel Solutions contributed 89.36% ($2,744,844 thousand) and Hospitality Solutions contributed 10.64% ($326,819 thousand) of Sabre Corporation's total segment revenue in 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "For fiscal 2024, Sabre reported segment revenue of **$2,744,844 thousand for Travel Solutions** and **$326,819 thousand for Hospitality Solutions**, out of **$3,071,663 thousand in total segment revenue**.\n\n- **Travel Solutions:** 2,744,844 ÷ 3,071,663 × 100 = **89.36%**\n- **Hospitality Solutions:** 326,819 ÷ 3,071,663 × 100 = **10.64%**\n\nSource: Sabre’s 2024 Form 10-K, `file_stem` **0001597033-25-000027**, `file_id` **sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet**, revenue table at character offsets **194767–206767**.", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's segment figures ($2,744,844K Travel Solutions, $326,819K Hospitality Solutions, $3,071,663K total) match the reference and the exact quoted table. The percentages (89.36% and 10.64%) match the reference and the DuckDB computation in the tool output (89.3602%, 10.6398%). The stated fiscal year, units (thousands), and accession number are correct. The cited file_stem and character offsets 194767-206767 match the read_filing output for the revenue table. Minor deduction: the candidate's file_id and offsets are accurate but the answer adds more detail than the reference, which is harmless. Citation support is strong because the table text and the arithmetic query both appear in the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00508945, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00330715, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017823, "wall_seconds": 32.557045198000196, "api_seconds": 31.23063305100004, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 4, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 64257, "completion_tokens": 1155, "reasoning_tokens": 206, "cache_read_tokens": 27035, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001597033-25-000027" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-021346", "0001193125-25-051450", "0001193125-25-053907", "0001193125-25-053916", "0001193125-25-053926", "0001597033-25-000002", "0001597033-25-000005", "0001597033-25-000007", "0001597033-25-000011", "0001597033-25-000025", "0001597033-25-000027", "0001597033-25-000029", "0001597033-25-000031", "0001597033-25-000033", "0001597033-25-000035", "0001597033-25-000037", "0001597033-25-000039", "0001597033-25-000041", "0001597033-25-000043", "0001950047-25-001250" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/38da79c72f2f667f8a64b613.json", "detail_js": "details/38da79c72f2f667f8a64b613.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/38da79c72f2f667f8a64b613.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/93833ecbc09e42ef9a9b48cd978a3351.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/60bddee3d69f4da2befbe39d20ed4fff.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b302630b8e79fef0d09c8135", "question_id": "Q091", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, how much stock-based compensation expense was recognized across fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, and by what percentage did this expense increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025?", "reference": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023. Between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, stock-based compensation increased by $1,188 million, representing an increase of 33.47% (or approximately 33.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on the search results and tool budget constraints, NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 was located (Accession / file_stem: `0001045810-25-000023` in file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). However, the tool budget was exhausted before the specific line items and numerical values for stock-based compensation expense from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows could be retrieved. \n\nTherefore, the evidence returned is **insufficient** to provide the exact stock-based compensation expense figures for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, or the calculated percentage increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 40, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold quote gives stock-based compensation of 4737, 3549, and 2709 ($ millions) for FY2025, FY2024, and FY2023. The candidate gives none of these figures and no percentage increase, so it fails the core task. Its abstention is not justified because the question is answerable. The candidate correctly identifies accession 0001045810-25-000023 as the FY2025 10-K, which the tool output supports. The tool evidence also shows the cash flow statement was located (cf_pos and a 3000-character read of the statement), so the claim that the 'tool budget was exhausted before the line items could be retrieved' is not supported by the logged evidence. The candidate stopped one step short of reading the stock-based compensation row that was already within reach.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0413029, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0401625, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011404, "wall_seconds": 33.584765382000114, "api_seconds": 30.5781292499978, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 57609, "completion_tokens": 1469, "reasoning_tokens": 249, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b302630b8e79fef0d09c8135.json", "detail_js": "details/b302630b8e79fef0d09c8135.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b302630b8e79fef0d09c8135.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e32e4e86b9da42f88d08c45de9349176.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/33c6478a70f74f58932fc20af02f46ff.request.json" }, { "task_id": "69bb7d46fd487063e54abb64", "question_id": "Q091", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, how much stock-based compensation expense was recognized across fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, and by what percentage did this expense increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025?", "reference": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023. Between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, stock-based compensation increased by $1,188 million, representing an increase of 33.47% (or approximately 33.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025 (file stem: `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID: `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### 1. Stock-Based Compensation Expense Recognized\n*(Amounts reported in millions)*\n\n* **Fiscal Year 2025** (Year ended January 26, 2025): **$4,737 million**\n* **Fiscal Year 2024** (Year ended January 28, 2024): **$3,549 million**\n* **Fiscal Year 2023** (Year ended January 29, 2023): **$2,709 million**\n\n---\n\n### 2. Percentage Increase from Fiscal 2024 to Fiscal 2025\n\n$$\\text{Percentage Increase} = \\frac{\\text{FY2025} - \\text{FY2024}}{\\text{FY2024}} = \\frac{4{,}737 - 3{,}549}{3{,}549} = \\frac{1{,}188}{3{,}549} \\approx 33.4742\\%$$\n\nThe stock-based compensation expense increased by **$1,188 million**, or approximately **33.47%** (or **33.5%** rounded to one decimal place).", "correctness": 97, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports stock-based compensation of $4,737M (FY2025), $3,549M (FY2024), and $2,709M (FY2023), matching the reference and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows row in the tool output. The increase of $1,188M and 33.47% (≈33.5%) is arithmetically correct: 1,188/3,549 ≈ 0.33474. The fiscal year-end dates (Jan 26, 2025; Jan 28, 2024; Jan 29, 2023) match the income statement headers in the tool evidence. The accession and file ID cited appear in the search results. Minor deduction only because the candidate's fiscal-year labels and file ID go slightly beyond what the reference states, though they are supported by the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0362768, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0343635, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019133, "wall_seconds": 30.31507976300054, "api_seconds": 29.260262590996717, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 4, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 58126, "completion_tokens": 1365, "reasoning_tokens": 179, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/69bb7d46fd487063e54abb64.json", "detail_js": "details/69bb7d46fd487063e54abb64.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/69bb7d46fd487063e54abb64.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ebfb470e06e345058c4d1188ab0c7f9f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e6f001ccf5aa49f08ce5957dbfefb556.request.json" }, { "task_id": "a666d1bbf222e9aedbe01231", "question_id": "Q091", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, how much stock-based compensation expense was recognized across fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, and by what percentage did this expense increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025?", "reference": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023. Between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, stock-based compensation increased by $1,188 million, representing an increase of 33.47% (or approximately 33.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence confirms that the filing is NVIDIA Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 26, 2025, and gives stock-based compensation amounts in the statements of shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2023 ($2,710 million) and fiscal 2024 ($3,568 million). It does not include the cash-flow statement’s stock-based compensation figures or the fiscal 2025 amount. Therefore, I can’t reliably answer the requested three-year comparison or calculate the fiscal 2025 increase from the evidence available.", "correctness": 20, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the cash flow statement row (4737 / 3549 / 2709) exists in the filing, and the expected answer is a $1,188M increase (33.47%). The candidate abstained on the core question, so it provides none of the required FY2025 figure, the FY2024 and FY2023 cash-flow values, or the percentage increase. Its abstention is therefore not justified. Its partial figures are faithful to the tool output: the equity statement shows stock-based compensation of 2710 for FY2023 and 3568 for FY2024, and the candidate reports these accurately. Those equity-statement values differ from the cash-flow figures the question asks for (2709 and 3549), and the candidate does not flag that the figures are from a different statement. Its statement that the retrieved excerpts did not include the cash-flow stock-based compensation row or the FY2025 amount is accurate for the retrieved text. Citation support is strong because every claim matches the tool outputs, though the candidate could have retrieved the cash flow statement with a more targeted search.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004912425, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003010625, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019018, "wall_seconds": 34.405728777999684, "api_seconds": 31.852803161000338, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 60530, "completion_tokens": 1593, "reasoning_tokens": 388, "cache_read_tokens": 26525, "excerpt_characters": 21100, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/a666d1bbf222e9aedbe01231.json", "detail_js": "details/a666d1bbf222e9aedbe01231.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/a666d1bbf222e9aedbe01231.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c5a564fd28654bdb8c6a05d993c07211.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a23b4b6a2f6e4e8cbc20f59830ac2b10.request.json" }, { "task_id": "1582cf7913969b4c5eee2b2b", "question_id": "Q091", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025, how much stock-based compensation expense was recognized across fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, and by what percentage did this expense increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025?", "reference": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023. Between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, stock-based compensation increased by $1,188 million, representing an increase of 33.47% (or approximately 33.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA recognized stock-based compensation expense of **$4,737 million in fiscal 2025, $3,549 million in fiscal 2024, and $2,709 million in fiscal 2023**—equivalent to **$4.737 billion, $3.549 billion, and $2.709 billion**.\n\nThe increase from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025 was **33.5%**: \\((4{,}737-3{,}549) \\div 3{,}549 \\times 100 \\approx 33.5\\%\\).\n\nSource: NVIDIA Form 10-K, *Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows*, filing `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage at character offsets 273754–285754. The statement labels amounts “In millions.”", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "All three stock-based compensation figures (4,737; 3,549; 2,709 in millions) match the reference and the cash flow row in the tool output. The percentage is correct: (4,737 - 3,549) / 3,549 = 33.47%, which the candidate rounds to 33.5%, consistent with the reference's approximately 33.5%. The candidate's units (millions), accession number, and character offsets 273754-285754 all match the read_filing tool output. The only minor gap is that the candidate does not state the exact 33.47% figure or the $1,188 million dollar increase, which the reference includes.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00364466, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00184786, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0017968, "wall_seconds": 26.62529302999974, "api_seconds": 25.180910894996487, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 42859, "completion_tokens": 1106, "reasoning_tokens": 282, "cache_read_tokens": 16146, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/1582cf7913969b4c5eee2b2b.json", "detail_js": "details/1582cf7913969b4c5eee2b2b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/1582cf7913969b4c5eee2b2b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2fbf6e38299949afb60b8c5eb0403e97.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/966e48a167e94120b9430f7b66a94e9e.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7a226c7d300dc82efb1daac7", "question_id": "Q092", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the company's revenue growth rate in fiscal year 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding the effect of hedging) compared to its reported GAAP revenue growth rate?", "reference": "On a constant currency basis excluding the effect of hedging, Alphabet's revenues increased 15% year over year in 2024, compared to a reported GAAP consolidated revenue increase of 14% year over year (reaching $350.0 billion). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations slightly reduced reported GAAP revenue growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Alphabet Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (Item 7, *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*), the comparison between reported GAAP revenue growth and constant currency revenue growth for fiscal year 2024 is as follows:\n\n### **1. Reported GAAP Revenue Growth Rate**\n* **Fiscal Year 2023 Consolidated Revenues:** $307,394 million ($307.394 billion)\n* **Fiscal Year 2024 Consolidated Revenues:** $350,018 million ($350.018 billion)\n* **Dollar Change:** $42,624 million\n* **Reported GAAP Revenue Growth Rate:** **14%** \n $$\\left(\\frac{350,018 - 307,394}{307,394} \\approx 13.87\\% \\rightarrow 14\\%\\right)$$\n\n---\n\n### **2. Constant Currency Revenue Growth Rate (Excluding Hedging Effect)**\n* Under Alphabet's Non-GAAP constant currency presentation:\n * **Fiscal Year 2023 Revenues (excluding hedging effect):** $307,158 million\n * **Fiscal Year 2024 Constant Currency Revenues:** $352,743 million (calculated as 2024 revenues excluding hedging of $349,807 million minus the FX effect of $(2,936) million)\n * **Constant Currency Dollar Change:** $45,585 million (~$45.6 billion)\n* **Constant Currency Revenue Growth Rate:** **15%**\n $$\\left(\\frac{352,743 - 307,158}{307,158} \\approx 14.84\\% \\rightarrow 15\\%\\right)$$\n\n---\n\n### **Summary Comparison**\n* **Constant Currency Revenue Growth Rate:** **15%**\n* **Reported GAAP Revenue Growth Rate:** **14%**\n* The constant currency growth rate was **1 percentage point higher** than the reported GAAP revenue growth rate, reflecting a **(1)% foreign currency exchange (FX) effect** and a **0% hedging effect** on total revenue growth.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: constant currency growth is 15% and reported GAAP growth is 14%. Its figures agree with the tool output: consolidated revenues of $307,394M and $350,018M, constant currency revenues excluding hedging of $307,158M and $352,743M, a FX effect of $(2,936)M, and a hedging effect of 0%. The arithmetic checks out (42,624/307,394 ≈ 13.87%; 45,585/307,158 ≈ 14.84%). The only blemish is a sign-wording slip in describing the FX adjustment ('minus the FX effect of $(2,936)'), which does not change the result. Citation support is strong because the table and text the candidate relies on appear in the retrieved filing text, though the candidate did not quote the exact 'increased 15% year over year' sentence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.02889545, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02748375, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014117, "wall_seconds": 29.486090680000416, "api_seconds": 27.038528379000127, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41437, "completion_tokens": 1865, "reasoning_tokens": 482, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 9000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-025147", "0001415889-25-003895", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/7a226c7d300dc82efb1daac7.json", "detail_js": "details/7a226c7d300dc82efb1daac7.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7a226c7d300dc82efb1daac7.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2d8e3e61bfea4e678db8c13b03ae9a9d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/aa0933081aee4b49a2bac1d9ad7825fa.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2f08f1cfef76c819011e534f", "question_id": "Q092", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the company's revenue growth rate in fiscal year 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding the effect of hedging) compared to its reported GAAP revenue growth rate?", "reference": "On a constant currency basis excluding the effect of hedging, Alphabet's revenues increased 15% year over year in 2024, compared to a reported GAAP consolidated revenue increase of 14% year over year (reaching $350.0 billion). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations slightly reduced reported GAAP revenue growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Alphabet Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (Item 7, *Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*), the comparison between fiscal year 2024 revenue growth rates is as follows:\n\n### **1. Growth Rates**\n* **Constant Currency Revenue Growth Rate (Non-GAAP, excluding the effect of hedging):** **15%**\n* **Reported GAAP Revenue Growth Rate:** **14%**\n\n---\n\n### **2. Details and Reconciliation**\n\nFrom the **Executive Overview** table and the **Use of Non-GAAP Constant Currency Information** section (p. 35, 37–38):\n\n* **Reported GAAP Consolidated Revenues:**\n * FY 2023: **$307,394 million**\n * FY 2024: **$350,018 million**\n * Dollar Change: **+$42,624 million**\n * Reported GAAP Growth Rate: \n $$\\frac{\\$350,018 - \\$307,394}{\\$307,394} \\approx 13.87\\% \\rightarrow \\mathbf{14\\%}$$\n\n* **Constant Currency Revenues (excluding hedging):**\n * Alphabet defines constant currency revenues as revenues excluding the effect of foreign currency exchange rate movements (FX effect) as well as hedging activities.\n * FY 2023 revenues, excluding hedging effect ($236 million gain): **$307,158 million**\n * FY 2024 revenues, excluding hedging effect ($211 million gain): **$349,807 million**\n * FY 2024 foreign currency exchange effect: **$(2,936) million**\n * FY 2024 constant currency revenues: **$352,743 million** ($349,807 million less FX effect of $(2,936) million)\n * Constant Currency Growth Rate: \n $$\\frac{\\$352,743 - \\$307,158}{\\$307,158} = \\frac{\\$45,585}{\\$307,158} \\approx 14.84\\% \\rightarrow \\mathbf{15\\%}$$\n\n### **Summary Comparison**\nRevenue growth in FY 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding hedging) was **15%**, which was **1 percentage point higher** than the reported GAAP revenue growth rate of **14%**, reflecting an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact of approximately $(2.94) billion across international operations.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's headline figures match the reference: 15% constant-currency growth excluding hedging and 14% reported GAAP growth. Its supporting arithmetic checks out against the filing. Reported revenue of $350,018M versus $307,394M gives about 13.87%, which rounds to 14%. Constant-currency revenue of $352,743M versus $307,158M gives about 14.84%, which rounds to 15%. The FX effect of $(2,936)M and hedging gains of $236M and $211M match the retrieved table. The candidate's description of FX as an unfavorable effect of about $2.94B is consistent with the table. The reference's $350.0B figure is also consistent. Minor deductions: the candidate's page citations are approximate, and it does not name the accession number in its answer. Its claims are otherwise directly supported by the retrieved Item 7 text and tables.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04161995, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03937725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022427, "wall_seconds": 34.6073647459998, "api_seconds": 33.326135896995766, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 64715, "completion_tokens": 2043, "reasoning_tokens": 585, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/2f08f1cfef76c819011e534f.json", "detail_js": "details/2f08f1cfef76c819011e534f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2f08f1cfef76c819011e534f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b5238939773444e999f2bc928538082f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/368c998b473a419f95bb50b907549306.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4ad2a75aa523812e0293573c", "question_id": "Q092", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the company's revenue growth rate in fiscal year 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding the effect of hedging) compared to its reported GAAP revenue growth rate?", "reference": "On a constant currency basis excluding the effect of hedging, Alphabet's revenues increased 15% year over year in 2024, compared to a reported GAAP consolidated revenue increase of 14% year over year (reaching $350.0 billion). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations slightly reduced reported GAAP revenue growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet’s fiscal 2024 revenue growth was **15% on a constant-currency basis, excluding the effect of hedging**, compared with **14% reported GAAP revenue growth**—a difference of **1 percentage point**.\n\nThe 10-K reports consolidated revenues of **$307,394 million in 2023** and **$350,018 million in 2024**, with a **14%** reported change and a **15%** constant-currency change. Evidence: filing `0001652044-25-000014`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, around character offset **171,500**.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 95, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same core answer as the reference: 15% constant-currency growth versus 14% reported GAAP growth, a 1-percentage-point gap. Its 2023 and 2024 consolidated revenue figures ($307,394M and $350,018M) match the tool output and the reference's $350.0 billion. It omits the reference's note that FX fluctuations slightly reduced reported growth, which is a minor completeness gap. The citation is supported: the tool-retrieved substring at offset 171,500 contains the Executive Overview table with 14% and 15% and the bullet stating constant-currency revenues excluding hedging increased 15%. The 'around offset 171,500' locator is approximate but correct, since the 'constant currency' string begins at 172,081 within the retrieved window.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0021407600000000002, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00110826, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010325, "wall_seconds": 22.324946017999537, "api_seconds": 21.29366389199822, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 26064, "completion_tokens": 1212, "reasoning_tokens": 381, "cache_read_tokens": 13306, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/4ad2a75aa523812e0293573c.json", "detail_js": "details/4ad2a75aa523812e0293573c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4ad2a75aa523812e0293573c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/863dd27fa5594c1293dadd80cbb0f121.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/ff5251b5a8024a428e70f7074a9a277a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ff0185e16a6ceaa1898f8fad", "question_id": "Q092", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the company's revenue growth rate in fiscal year 2024 on a constant currency basis (excluding the effect of hedging) compared to its reported GAAP revenue growth rate?", "reference": "On a constant currency basis excluding the effect of hedging, Alphabet's revenues increased 15% year over year in 2024, compared to a reported GAAP consolidated revenue increase of 14% year over year (reaching $350.0 billion). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations slightly reduced reported GAAP revenue growth.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet reported **15% revenue growth on a constant-currency basis, excluding hedging effects**, compared with **14% reported GAAP revenue growth** for fiscal 2024—**1 percentage point higher**.\n\nThe 10-K’s Executive Overview gives both growth rates and reports revenue of $350.018 billion in 2024 versus $307.394 billion in 2023. **Source:** filing `0001652044-25-000014`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, offsets 171080–183080.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gives the same core answer as the reference: 15% constant-currency growth excluding hedging versus 14% reported GAAP growth, a 1-point gap. Revenue figures match the filing table in millions ($350,018M in 2024, $307,394M in 2023), correctly rendered as $350.018B and $307.394B. The cited accession and offsets 171080–183080 match the read_filing output, and the Executive Overview table and bullet support both growth rates. The candidate omits the reference's remark that FX slightly reduced reported growth, a minor interpretive point not needed to answer the question. No abstention issue applies.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002812895, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001445395, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013675, "wall_seconds": 28.558123899001657, "api_seconds": 27.657356637000703, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 33296, "completion_tokens": 1067, "reasoning_tokens": 317, "cache_read_tokens": 13802, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-020613", "0000950170-25-021536", "0000950170-25-021555", "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022825", "0000950170-25-022933", "0000950170-25-023879", "0000950170-25-025147", "0000950170-25-028107", "0000950170-25-028131", "0000950170-25-029764", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000016", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000578", "0001950047-25-000967", "0001950047-25-000975", "0001950047-25-001130" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 2, "gold_quote_count": 2, "flags": [ "other" ], "detail_json": "details/ff0185e16a6ceaa1898f8fad.json", "detail_js": "details/ff0185e16a6ceaa1898f8fad.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ff0185e16a6ceaa1898f8fad.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/091b5abd43c440c8a37bb244df7559e6.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/01746c04230f4715b3f5917f547946d8.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ed7fbcc33ca2aac380a6a32c", "question_id": "Q093", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total dollar amount of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets recognized during fiscal year 2024, and which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible?", "reference": "Intel recognized $3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets during fiscal year 2024, which were primarily related to Mobileye.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Intel Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K (filing accession/file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, CIK `0000050863`):\n\n### 1. Total Dollar Amount\n* In the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of the 2024 Form 10-K, Intel reports:\n > **\"$3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain of our reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets (see \"Note 7: Restructuring and Other Charges\" within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)\"**\n\n### 2. Reporting Unit or Acquisition Primarily Responsible\n* **Limitation:** Due to tool budget limits, the specific footnote text detailing the breakdown by individual reporting unit or specific acquisition was not retrieved prior to exhaustion of the budget. Therefore, the specific reporting unit or acquisition primarily responsible cannot be verified from the returned tool evidence alone.", "correctness": 55, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly reports the $3.1 billion figure, the non-cash goodwill and intangible impairment context, and the accession number 0000050863-25-000009. Its quote matches the tool snippet verbatim, and the Note 7 pointer also appears in the retrieved text, so the dollar-amount portion is well supported. However, the candidate fails the second half of the question: it does not identify the reporting unit or acquisition, which the reference states was primarily Mobileye. It honestly abstains on that part, but the gold evidence quote does not itself name Mobileye, so the omission is partial. The claim that the tool budget was exhausted before the footnote was retrieved is not stated in the tool outputs, so that explanation is unsupported, though it does not change the answer's substance. Overall: correct on the amount, incomplete on attribution.", "known_cost_usd": 0.04172345, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04041675, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013067, "wall_seconds": 34.610573492000185, "api_seconds": 32.56235545900199, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 58306, "completion_tokens": 1730, "reasoning_tokens": 462, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 3500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ed7fbcc33ca2aac380a6a32c.json", "detail_js": "details/ed7fbcc33ca2aac380a6a32c.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ed7fbcc33ca2aac380a6a32c.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/95e3949cb42143b0bbac70e738033eb0.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2d67ca63d0424c9296aaa19e377ebebb.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6c10c47ff28a8c000f678d14", "question_id": "Q093", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total dollar amount of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets recognized during fiscal year 2024, and which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible?", "reference": "Intel recognized $3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets during fiscal year 2024, which were primarily related to Mobileye.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K (filing `0000050863-25-000009`, MD&A — *Operating Segment Trends and Results*, page 13, character range ~76,826–88,826):\n\n### 1. Total Dollar Amount\n* **Total non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets:** **$3.1 billion**\n > *\"Our 2024 consolidated results of operations were also materially impacted by the following: ... **$3.1 billion** of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain of our reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets (see \"Note 7: Restructuring and Other Charges\" within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)...\"*\n\n---\n\n### 2. Reporting Unit or Acquisition Primarily Responsible\n* **Evidence Limitation:** Due to the exhaustion of the tool budget, the specific footnote detailing the breakdown of Note 7 / the Goodwill footnote was not retrieved. Therefore, based strictly on the returned text within the budget, the filing states these were non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill *\"for certain of our reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets,\"* but the specific reporting unit or acquisition primarily responsible cannot be confirmed from the retrieved evidence.", "correctness": 50, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The dollar amount is correct: $3.1 billion of non-cash charges tied to goodwill impairment for certain reporting units and certain acquired intangible assets. The quoted language matches the retrieved text verbatim, and the character range matches the read_filing output. The second part of the question is answerable from the reference (primarily Mobileye), but the candidate abstained on it, calling it unconfirmable. That is an incomplete answer, not a justified abstention. The candidate's own tool trace also returned a 'Mobileye' hit (position 36765) that it never read, so the abstention was avoidable. The claim that the tool budget was exhausted is not supported by the trace, which shows no budget-exhaustion error. The section label 'Operating Segment Trends and Results' is loose: the quoted passage sits in the overview before the segment discussion. Overall: correct on the amount, incomplete on the responsible entity, with some unsupported process claims.", "known_cost_usd": 0.06422965, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.062019750000000005, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022099, "wall_seconds": 36.444876371000646, "api_seconds": 34.64013595200049, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 95322, "completion_tokens": 1894, "reasoning_tokens": 532, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6c10c47ff28a8c000f678d14.json", "detail_js": "details/6c10c47ff28a8c000f678d14.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6c10c47ff28a8c000f678d14.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7654071ee130400ead3a1b37b055adbe.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cdb776958fd94181baa01cd5172c2bae.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9a678b3cf45c712e983d75bf", "question_id": "Q093", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total dollar amount of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets recognized during fiscal year 2024, and which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible?", "reference": "Intel recognized $3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets during fiscal year 2024, which were primarily related to Mobileye.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel reported **$3.1 billion** in non-cash charges associated with impairments of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets in fiscal 2024. The **Mobileye reporting unit** was primarily responsible: Intel recorded a **$2.6 billion goodwill impairment** for Mobileye.\n\nEvidence: Intel 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0000050863-25-000009` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the $3.1 billion disclosure appears around parsed-text characters 77,000–79,500, and the Mobileye impairment disclosure around characters 324,800–327,000.", "correctness": 85, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate gets the core figure right: $3.1 billion of non-cash charges for goodwill impairment and certain acquired intangibles in 2024. The tool output contains this exact sentence, and the Mobileye $2.6 billion goodwill impairment also appears in the retrieved auditor text. The candidate matches the reference's attribution to Mobileye. However, the retrieved evidence does not explicitly say the $3.1 billion is primarily Mobileye-related. That link is an inference from the $2.6 billion Mobileye impairment, so the 'primarily responsible' claim is only partly supported. The cited character ranges and accession number are consistent with the tool outputs.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003017095, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001611695, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014054, "wall_seconds": 27.945653153999956, "api_seconds": 26.514695174000735, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 43192, "completion_tokens": 1622, "reasoning_tokens": 555, "cache_read_tokens": 25422, "excerpt_characters": 9200, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000084", "0000050863-25-000087", "0000050863-25-000089", "0000050863-25-000094", "0001127602-25-013177", "0001127602-25-013180", "0001127602-25-013720", "0001127602-25-013723", "0001127602-25-013732", "0001127602-25-013734", "0001127602-25-013735", "0001127602-25-013738", "0001127602-25-013739", "0001127602-25-013740", "0001127602-25-013741", "0001127602-25-013742", "0001127602-25-016494", "0001127602-25-016503", "0001127602-25-016513", "0001127602-25-016515" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/9a678b3cf45c712e983d75bf.json", "detail_js": "details/9a678b3cf45c712e983d75bf.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9a678b3cf45c712e983d75bf.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cd9e76ed05f64b5ab339959f87281351.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a9e067ba0595479f81b3c319fed801d7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c8f934cb7052ccc259b79719", "question_id": "Q093", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "currency", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total dollar amount of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill and certain acquired intangible assets recognized during fiscal year 2024, and which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible?", "reference": "Intel recognized $3.1 billion of non-cash charges associated with the impairment of goodwill for certain reporting units as well as certain acquired intangible assets during fiscal year 2024, which were primarily related to Mobileye.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel reported **$3.1 billion** in non-cash charges in fiscal 2024 for goodwill impairment and certain acquired intangible assets. The filing identifies multiple reporting units and acquired assets; the cited disclosure does **not** name which reporting unit or acquisition was primarily responsible.\n\n**Source:** Intel Corporation 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`, characters 76,826–88,826. The filing describes the amount as $3.1 billion; it does not provide a more specific primary cause in that passage.", "correctness": 55, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states the $3.1 billion non-cash charge for goodwill impairment and certain acquired intangible assets in fiscal 2024, which matches the reference and the gold quote. It omits the reference's second element, that the charges were primarily related to Mobileye. The gold quote and the retrieved passages do not mention Mobileye as the cause, so the candidate's statement that the cited disclosure does not name the primary reporting unit or acquisition is faithful to the evidence. Because the reference treats the question as answerable, the abstention on the second part is only partial credit. The citation is well supported: the file_stem, source file, and character range match the tool output, and the $3.1 billion figure appears in the retrieved passage at that offset.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00579518, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00286828, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0029269, "wall_seconds": 68.09613862699916, "api_seconds": 66.84246406000057, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 82911, "completion_tokens": 1583, "reasoning_tokens": 751, "cache_read_tokens": 41038, "excerpt_characters": 48000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/c8f934cb7052ccc259b79719.json", "detail_js": "details/c8f934cb7052ccc259b79719.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c8f934cb7052ccc259b79719.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/051bbe9d17dc4aecb9a24f695f10a2cc.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4225700246ed4640bc6080e2e5752b8f.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e685109116635e40706cfe08", "question_id": "Q094", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K Non-GAAP reconciliations, what were the company's Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars) and Adjusted Gross Profit Margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022?", "reference": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's Non-GAAP reconciliations, Adjusted gross profits and Adjusted gross profit margins were: for 2024, $2,765,014 thousand (15.6%); for 2023, $2,604,608 thousand (14.8%); and for 2022, $3,593,177 thousand (14.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (`file_stem: 0001043277-25-000012` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n### **1. Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars)**\nFrom the table of adjusted gross profits by transportation mode (Item 1, characters ~25,000–26,000):\n- **2024:** **$2,633,810** thousand\n- **2023:** **$2,486,636** thousand\n- **2022:** **$3,480,669** thousand\n\n---\n\n### **2. Adjusted Gross Profit Margins**\nFrom Item 1A (Risk Factors, characters ~75,000–76,000):\n> *\"Adjusted gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as adjusted gross profits divided by total revenues. For additional information, see Item 7 of Part II, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.\"*\n\n**Limitation Due to Tool Budget:**\nThe specific MD&A Non-GAAP reconciliation table in Item 7 listing the exact reported percentage figures for **Adjusted Gross Profit Margin** for 2024, 2023, and 2022 could not be retrieved before the tool budget was exhausted. Consequently, the filing evidence returned is insufficient to provide the reported Adjusted Gross Profit Margin percentages.", "correctness": 10, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's three Adjusted Gross Profit figures ($2,633,810K for 2024, $2,486,636K for 2023, $3,480,669K for 2022) do not match the reference reconciliation values ($2,765,014K, $2,604,608K, $3,593,177K). The candidate took them from the Item 1 transportation-mode table, which is a different presentation than the Item 7 Non-GAAP reconciliation the question asks for. The candidate also gave no Adjusted Gross Profit Margin percentages (15.6%, 14.8%, 14.5% in the reference), though it honestly disclosed that gap. Citation support is high because the quoted Item 1 table totals and the Item 1A definition text appear verbatim in the tool output. The support covers what was quoted, not whether it answers the question. Overall the answer is mostly incorrect on values and incomplete on margins.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03281595, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03139575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014202, "wall_seconds": 68.20646932300042, "api_seconds": 65.83708767399548, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46698, "completion_tokens": 1873, "reasoning_tokens": 485, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 10500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012", "0001043277-25-000014", "0001043277-25-000022" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/e685109116635e40706cfe08.json", "detail_js": "details/e685109116635e40706cfe08.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e685109116635e40706cfe08.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b7d1278ebc134f3696614483ab0e1f32.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c579127ea43240e1846d776e7489a52c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "4612e6cdf8b1f263b161a6eb", "question_id": "Q094", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K Non-GAAP reconciliations, what were the company's Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars) and Adjusted Gross Profit Margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022?", "reference": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's Non-GAAP reconciliations, Adjusted gross profits and Adjusted gross profit margins were: for 2024, $2,765,014 thousand (15.6%); for 2023, $2,604,608 thousand (14.8%); and for 2022, $3,593,177 thousand (14.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001043277-25-000012`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the following information was retrieved:\n\n### **Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars)**\nFrom Item 1 (*Business - Adjusted Gross Profits by Transportation Mode*, characters 24,337–36,337):\n* **Adjusted Gross Profits from Transportation Services:**\n * **2024:** $2,633,810 thousand\n * **2023:** $2,486,636 thousand\n * **2022:** $3,480,669 thousand\n\nThe filing defines Adjusted Gross Profit as a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as total revenues less the total of purchased transportation and related services and the cost of purchased products sourced for resale. It notes that:\n* Transportation services accounted for approximately 95% of adjusted gross profits in 2024 and 2023, and 97% in 2022.\n* Sourcing accounted for approximately 5% of adjusted gross profits in 2024 and 2023, and 3% in 2022.\n\n---\n\n### **Adjusted Gross Profit Margins and Consolidated Total Adjusted Gross Profits Reconciliations**\n* **Limitation:** Due to exhaustion of the tool budget before locating and reading the specific Non-GAAP reconciliation table in Item 7 (*Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*), the exact consolidated total Adjusted Gross Profits and the reported Adjusted Gross Profit Margins (percentages) for 2024, 2023, and 2022 could not be fully retrieved from the filing text.", "correctness": 12, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference asks for consolidated Adjusted Gross Profits and margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022 (2,765,014 / 2,604,608 / 3,593,177 thousand; 15.6%, 14.8%, 14.5%). The candidate never retrieved the Item 7 reconciliation table and explicitly abstained on the consolidated totals and margins, so it misses the core answer. The only figures it reports are transportation-services adjusted gross profits by mode (2,633,810 / 2,486,636 / 3,480,669), which are a segment subset and do not match the reference totals; presenting them under the question's heading is misleading, though the candidate labels them as transportation services. Its abstention on the missing items is honest and the transportation figures are accurately cited from the Item 1 table (2023 total shown as 2,486,636 in the source, candidate says 2,486,636, correct). Citation support is high because every number it states traces to tool output, but correctness is low because the requested figures are absent.", "known_cost_usd": 0.053822800000000004, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.051874500000000004, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0019483, "wall_seconds": 67.68285002300036, "api_seconds": 64.87125400899822, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 81749, "completion_tokens": 1380, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000008", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001437749-25-003180", "0001437749-25-003182", "0001437749-25-003184", "0001437749-25-003186", "0001437749-25-003188", "0001437749-25-003190", "0001437749-25-004586", "0001437749-25-004589", "0001437749-25-004591", "0001437749-25-004593", "0001959173-25-001031", "0001959173-25-001070", "0001959173-25-001415" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/4612e6cdf8b1f263b161a6eb.json", "detail_js": "details/4612e6cdf8b1f263b161a6eb.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/4612e6cdf8b1f263b161a6eb.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/1c11bec4bb6241b6a85993e4f7cf0eb7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b1acc4f0c6d84d85975d9aec560a0788.request.json" }, { "task_id": "10c44535487f9ba946cbe8a1", "question_id": "Q094", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K Non-GAAP reconciliations, what were the company's Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars) and Adjusted Gross Profit Margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022?", "reference": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's Non-GAAP reconciliations, Adjusted gross profits and Adjusted gross profit margins were: for 2024, $2,765,014 thousand (15.6%); for 2023, $2,604,608 thousand (14.8%); and for 2022, $3,593,177 thousand (14.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to answer. It identifies a 2025 filing for CIK 1043277, but does not verify the company’s identity or provide the 2024 Form 10-K’s Non-GAAP reconciliation figures for Adjusted Gross Profit and margin.", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference is answerable: the gold evidence gives a specific Non-GAAP table with Adjusted Gross Profit and margin for 2024, 2023, and 2022. The candidate abstains and provides none of these figures, so it fails the core question. Abstention earns full correctness only when the question is unanswerable, which is not the case here. The candidate's cited claims are mostly supported by the tool output. The tool results show 2025 filings under CIK 1043277 (accession prefix 0001043277) and no verified 10-K reconciliation table. The tool output also shows that a query on accession 0000008063 returned Astronics Corp filings, which the candidate did not misattribute. The gold accession 0001043277-25-000012 does not appear in the returned rows, so the candidate's statement that the evidence is insufficient is reasonable. Citation support is high, but correctness is very low because the answer is missing.", "known_cost_usd": 0.004053565, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.002577765, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014758, "wall_seconds": 67.1794738360004, "api_seconds": 65.87664225299886, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47659, "completion_tokens": 1841, "reasoning_tokens": 588, "cache_read_tokens": 22019, "excerpt_characters": 3000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000008063-25-000002", "0000008063-25-000005", "0000008063-25-000008", "0000008063-25-000020", "0000902664-25-000071", "0000919574-25-001528", "0001043277-25-000004", "0001134007-25-000004", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180", "0001628280-25-005031", "0001628280-25-009427", "0001628280-25-009428", "0001628280-25-009429", "0001628280-25-009435", "0001628280-25-009437", "0001628280-25-009439", "0001628280-25-009442", "0001628280-25-009447", "0001628280-25-009450", "0001628280-25-009502", "0001628280-25-011997", "0002012383-25-001265" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/10c44535487f9ba946cbe8a1.json", "detail_js": "details/10c44535487f9ba946cbe8a1.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/10c44535487f9ba946cbe8a1.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8e4df40c56a043448616b9e430276fb9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bcabca81ffef40628229986e3cb17b1d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2db60abb23cf99b46c9a015f", "question_id": "Q094", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K Non-GAAP reconciliations, what were the company's Adjusted Gross Profits (in thousands of dollars) and Adjusted Gross Profit Margins for 2024, 2023, and 2022?", "reference": "According to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's Non-GAAP reconciliations, Adjusted gross profits and Adjusted gross profit margins were: for 2024, $2,765,014 thousand (15.6%); for 2023, $2,604,608 thousand (14.8%); and for 2022, $3,593,177 thousand (14.5%).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence confirms 2024 adjusted gross profits of **$2,633,810 thousand**. It does not include the Non-GAAP reconciliation figures for adjusted gross profit margins or the adjusted gross profits for 2023 and 2022, so I can’t reliably provide the full requested year-by-year comparison.", "correctness": 15, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference gives three years of Adjusted Gross Profits and margins from the Non-GAAP reconciliation: $2,765,014K (15.6%) for 2024, $2,604,608K (14.8%) for 2023, and $3,593,177K (14.5%) for 2022. The candidate reports only 2024 and gives $2,633,810K, which does not match the reference's 2024 figure of $2,765,014K. That number is the 'Total' row of the by-transportation-mode adjusted gross profit table in the tool output, a different table from the reconciliation the question asks about. The candidate presents it as confirmation without noting the discrepancy. It also omits the 2023 and 2022 values and all margins, and abstains on those only partly, while the tool output did contain the 2023 and 2022 mode-table totals ($2,486,636K and $3,480,669K) that it did not use. Citation support is moderate: the $2,633,810K figure does appear in the retrieved text, but the candidate's claim that it 'confirms' the requested Non-GAAP figure is not supported, since that table is not the reconciliation and the retrieved text does not show a reconciliation total.", "known_cost_usd": 0.006289035, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.003768535, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025205, "wall_seconds": 40.65231266600131, "api_seconds": 39.019846243003485, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 81245, "completion_tokens": 1822, "reasoning_tokens": 776, "cache_read_tokens": 36991, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000012" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001043277-25-000004", "0001043277-25-000008", "0001043277-25-000012", "0001437749-25-000299", "0001437749-25-000300", "0001437749-25-000302", "0001437749-25-000303", "0001437749-25-000304", "0001437749-25-000305", "0001437749-25-000306", "0001437749-25-000307", "0001437749-25-000308", "0001437749-25-000309", "0001437749-25-000312", "0001437749-25-000313", "0001437749-25-000314", "0001437749-25-000315", "0001437749-25-000316", "0001437749-25-000317", "0001437749-25-000318", "0001437749-25-000332", "0001437749-25-003180", "0001437749-25-003182", "0001437749-25-003184", "0001437749-25-003186", "0001437749-25-003188", "0001437749-25-003190", "0001437749-25-004586", "0001437749-25-004589", "0001437749-25-004591", "0001437749-25-004593", "0001959173-25-001031", "0001959173-25-001070", "0001959173-25-001415" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/2db60abb23cf99b46c9a015f.json", "detail_js": "details/2db60abb23cf99b46c9a015f.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2db60abb23cf99b46c9a015f.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f4f6452d308e44e4be6db19cc13ced4b.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/3648f8b0ffbd49279d38c302df3d3455.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ec6331cc0cbe0a01f21613ba", "question_id": "Q095", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Note 4 (Leases) in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years, what was the total imputed interest, and what was the resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet's undiscounted total future operating lease payments totaled $17,038 million, less imputed interest of $(2,460) million, resulting in a total operating lease liability balance of $14,578 million (plus $1,677 million for finance lease liabilities from $1,888 million payments less $211 million imputed interest).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to **Note 4 (Leases)** of Alphabet Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (filing `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the schedule of future lease payments as of December 31, 2024 reports the following for operating leases (in millions):\n\n### **Operating Lease Obligations as of December 31, 2024**\n\n* **Undiscounted Future Operating Lease Payments by Period:**\n * **2025:** $3,162 million\n * **2026:** $2,824 million\n * **2027:** $2,311 million\n * **2028:** $1,838 million\n * **2029:** $1,448 million\n * **Thereafter:** $5,455 million\n* **Total future lease payments (undiscounted obligation):** **$17,038 million** (or **$17.038 billion**)\n* **Less imputed interest:** **$(2,460) million** (or **$2.460 billion**)\n* **Total lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet:** **$14,578 million** (or **$14.578 billion**)\n\n---\n\n### **Balance Sheet Components**\nAs reported under the supplemental balance sheet information in Note 4, the **$14,578 million** total operating lease liability balance consists of:\n* **Accrued expenses and other liabilities (current):** $2,887 million\n* **Operating lease liabilities (non-current):** $11,691 million\n* **Total operating lease liabilities:** **$14,578 million**", "correctness": 98, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core figures match the reference and the tool output exactly: undiscounted total future operating lease payments of $17,038M, imputed interest of $(2,460)M, and total operating lease liability of $14,578M, all in millions as of Dec 31, 2024. The year-by-year payments (3,162; 2,824; 2,311; 1,838; 1,448; thereafter 5,455) match the Note 4 table in the retrieved text. The split of $2,887M current and $11,691M non-current sums correctly to $14,578M and matches the supplemental balance sheet table. The accession 0001652044-25-000014 and the 10-K form are confirmed by the header retrieved from the filing. The candidate omits the finance lease figures from the reference, but the question asked only about operating leases, so this is not an error. The first tool call failed, but the later calls returned the needed evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03298435, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03157575, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014086, "wall_seconds": 32.188521054000375, "api_seconds": 30.21334210200257, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 47117, "completion_tokens": 1814, "reasoning_tokens": 284, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 8000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/ec6331cc0cbe0a01f21613ba.json", "detail_js": "details/ec6331cc0cbe0a01f21613ba.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ec6331cc0cbe0a01f21613ba.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/32e355b61f6b4167bb21c1107f8672c8.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/19782ccc8aad49af9f0b09f3ff9e8bb7.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d7da12a715b1065f2e275a10", "question_id": "Q095", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Note 4 (Leases) in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years, what was the total imputed interest, and what was the resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet's undiscounted total future operating lease payments totaled $17,038 million, less imputed interest of $(2,460) million, resulting in a total operating lease liability balance of $14,578 million (plus $1,677 million for finance lease liabilities from $1,888 million payments less $211 million imputed interest).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to **Note 4 (Leases)** in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (filing `0001652044-25-000014`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the future lease payments table as of December 31, 2024 reports the following for operating leases:\n\n### **Future Operating Lease Payments Schedule** (as of December 31, 2024)\n- **2025:** $3,162 million\n- **2026:** $2,824 million\n- **2027:** $2,311 million\n- **2028:** $1,838 million\n- **2029:** $1,448 million\n- **Thereafter:** $5,455 million\n\n---\n\n### **Summary of Requested Figures**\n1. **Total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years:** \n $$\\$17,038\\text{ million}$$ \n *(or approximately $\\$17.038\\text{ billion}$)*\n2. **Total imputed interest:** \n $$\\$(2,460)\\text{ million}\\quad (\\text{or } \\$2,460\\text{ million})$$\n3. **Resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet:** \n $$\\$14,578\\text{ million}$$ \n *(or approximately $\\$14.578\\text{ billion}$)*\n\n---\n\n### **Balance Sheet Breakdown**\nAs detailed in the supplemental balance sheet table in Note 4:\n- **Current operating lease liabilities** (included in *Accrued expenses and other liabilities*): **$2,887 million**\n- **Non-current operating lease liabilities** (*Operating lease liabilities*): **$11,691 million**\n- **Total operating lease liabilities:** **$14,578 million** ($\\$2,887\\text{ million} + \\$11,691\\text{ million}$)", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 97, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference on all three requested figures: undiscounted total future operating lease payments of $17,038M, imputed interest of $(2,460)M, and total operating lease liability of $14,578M as of December 31, 2024. Its year-by-year schedule (3,162; 2,824; 2,311; 1,838; 1,448; 5,455) and the current/non-current split ($2,887M and $11,691M) match the Note 4 table in the tool output. The accession number and filing are correctly identified. The units are correct, with the billion-scale conversions consistent with the millions figures. The candidate omits the finance lease figures the reference mentions, but the question asks only about operating leases, so this is not an error. Minor deduction only for the unnecessary extra breakdown and the slight phrasing around the billion conversions.", "known_cost_usd": 0.019794799999999998, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.018335999999999998, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0014588, "wall_seconds": 21.9176869310013, "api_seconds": 21.39572265899733, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 31251, "completion_tokens": 1557, "reasoning_tokens": 315, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001193125-25-095696", "0001193125-25-098380", "0001193125-25-101705", "0001193125-25-107005", "0001193125-25-110020", "0001193125-25-110061", "0001193125-25-113864", "0001308179-25-000511", "0001308179-25-000513", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000043" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/d7da12a715b1065f2e275a10.json", "detail_js": "details/d7da12a715b1065f2e275a10.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d7da12a715b1065f2e275a10.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2331b1d3846445f08df078ccde3ed36d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/980e39fc3b534c579dfb7d10422bd44a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6bb01d52c86334ceb19e1f15", "question_id": "Q095", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Note 4 (Leases) in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years, what was the total imputed interest, and what was the resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet's undiscounted total future operating lease payments totaled $17,038 million, less imputed interest of $(2,460) million, resulting in a total operating lease liability balance of $14,578 million (plus $1,677 million for finance lease liabilities from $1,888 million payments less $211 million imputed interest).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Note 4 reports (in millions) **$17,038 million** in total future operating lease payments, less **$2,460 million** of imputed interest, resulting in a **$14,578 million** total operating lease liability balance as of December 31, 2024. The arithmetic is $17,038 − $2,460 = $14,578.\n\n**Source:** Alphabet Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; Note 4, “Future lease payments as of December 31, 2024” table (SQL excerpt beginning at character 315,851).", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 96, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reports the three operating-lease figures the question asks for: undiscounted future payments of $17,038M, imputed interest of $(2,460)M, and a total operating lease liability of $14,578M as of December 31, 2024. All three match the reference and the Note 4 table in the tool output, and the subtraction is correct. The candidate omits the finance lease figures ($1,888M, $(211)M, $1,677M) that the reference adds, but the question asked only about operating leases, so this is a minor completeness gap rather than an error. The cited source (file ID, accession, Note 4 future lease payments table, character offset 315,851) is traceable to the tool outputs, which show the table and the offset returned by the strpos query.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002049485, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.000997285, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010522, "wall_seconds": 15.131519918000777, "api_seconds": 14.641413791998275, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 19395, "completion_tokens": 950, "reasoning_tokens": 331, "cache_read_tokens": 5561, "excerpt_characters": 5000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/6bb01d52c86334ceb19e1f15.json", "detail_js": "details/6bb01d52c86334ceb19e1f15.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6bb01d52c86334ceb19e1f15.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/642afd0d9beb41af87edec7a21dbe328.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/81f8c3a31639430681209fd37296a412.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8d0c56a240df6dd2b4edf232", "question_id": "Q095", "difficulty": "extreme", "answer_type": "text", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Note 4 (Leases) in Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was the total undiscounted future operating lease payment obligation across all future years, what was the total imputed interest, and what was the resulting total operating lease liability balance recognized on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2024?", "reference": "As of December 31, 2024, Alphabet's undiscounted total future operating lease payments totaled $17,038 million, less imputed interest of $(2,460) million, resulting in a total operating lease liability balance of $14,578 million (plus $1,677 million for finance lease liabilities from $1,888 million payments less $211 million imputed interest).", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Note 4, as of December 31, 2024, Alphabet’s **total undiscounted future operating lease payments** were **$17,038 million**. Less **$2,460 million of imputed interest**, the recognized **total operating lease liability** was **$14,578 million** ($17.038 billion − $2.460 billion = $14.578 billion).\n\nSource: Alphabet Inc. 2024 Form 10-K, Note 4, “Future lease payments as of December 31, 2024” table; filing accession/file_stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, excerpt offsets 314850–326850. Units in millions.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 98, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The question asks specifically about operating leases. The candidate's figures match the reference and the tool evidence exactly: undiscounted operating lease payments of $17,038M, imputed interest of $(2,460)M, and a total operating lease liability of $14,578M. The arithmetic is correct (17,038 - 2,460 = 14,578) and units are stated as millions. The accession number and excerpt offsets match the read_filing output. The candidate omits the finance lease figures ($1,888M, $(211)M, $1,677M) that the reference adds, but the question did not ask for them, so this is a minor completeness gap rather than an error.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0024334, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0012024, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001231, "wall_seconds": 16.085244326000975, "api_seconds": 15.732343388999652, "api_attempts": 5, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 4, "tool_requested": 3, "tool_processed": 3, "tool_dispatched": 3, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 2, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 23450, "completion_tokens": 798, "reasoning_tokens": 208, "cache_read_tokens": 5405, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-022699", "0000950170-25-022933", "0001415889-25-003895", "0001652044-25-000010", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000027" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/8d0c56a240df6dd2b4edf232.json", "detail_js": "details/8d0c56a240df6dd2b4edf232.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8d0c56a240df6dd2b4edf232.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8bb2940d90a34b8ab6092b322b067384.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a3a045a0eac54d8d92ba858137669b6a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b924f52c94a8ca9e08142043", "question_id": "Q096", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, exactly how many individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems and standalone B200 GPUs were manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers during fiscal year 2025?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K mentions Blackwell architecture systems (specifically GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36, and B200) exclusively in the context of US export licensing regulations and trade restrictions, and does not disclose specific unit shipment quantities, production counts, or customer delivery numbers for any Blackwell products.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation’s fiscal 2025 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025; file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the evidence is **insufficient** to answer this question because **NVIDIA does not disclose the specific or exact number of individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems or standalone B200 GPUs manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers** during fiscal year 2025. \n\nIn the filing, Blackwell products such as \"GB200 NVL 72\", \"NVL 36\", and \"B200\" are referenced in qualitative contexts—most notably within Item 1A (*Risk Factors*) regarding U.S. government export control and licensing restrictions (e.g., around character offset 53,418–53,500)—without providing unit shipment, manufacturing, or commercial delivery volume breakdowns for these systems.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate abstains, which matches the reference that the filing does not disclose Blackwell unit shipment or production counts, so the core answer is correct. The accession number, file ID, fiscal year end (January 26, 2025), and the GB200/B200 mention near character offset 53,418 are all supported by the tool outputs. Citation support is weaker in three places. The tool outputs never show the Item 1A heading, so the 'Item 1A (Risk Factors)' placement is unverified, and the gold places the passage under Item 1 'Regulatory and Export Controls'. The claim that the filing contains no unit shipment breakdowns rests on a few keyword searches and one passage read, not an exhaustive check. The candidate also does not quote the supporting sentence, although the tool output contains it.", "known_cost_usd": 0.03981975, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.03854175, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001278, "wall_seconds": 35.397235035999984, "api_seconds": 32.908964792000916, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 55989, "completion_tokens": 1636, "reasoning_tokens": 382, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001045810-25-000086", "0001045810-25-000095", "0001045810-25-000098", "0001045810-25-000116", "0001045810-25-000118", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b924f52c94a8ca9e08142043.json", "detail_js": "details/b924f52c94a8ca9e08142043.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b924f52c94a8ca9e08142043.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/963104c0bc3048c5b8e9c168d5a06571.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5b8f903cd5ce4f7f862b3343cf241563.request.json" }, { "task_id": "6eb059b80919ef5bd22fb8c6", "question_id": "Q096", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, exactly how many individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems and standalone B200 GPUs were manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers during fiscal year 2025?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K mentions Blackwell architecture systems (specifically GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36, and B200) exclusively in the context of US export licensing regulations and trade restrictions, and does not disclose specific unit shipment quantities, production counts, or customer delivery numbers for any Blackwell products.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal year 2025 Form 10-K (filed on February 26, 2025, for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2025; file stem `0001045810-25-000023` in `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), the filing **does not disclose** the number of individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems or standalone B200 GPUs manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers. \n\nThe products (such as \"GB200 NVL 72\" and \"B200\") are mentioned qualitatively in the filing (e.g., in Item 1A *Risk Factors* regarding US government export licensing and restriction requirements), but exact quantitative unit volumes manufactured or shipped are not reported. Therefore, the evidence in the Form 10-K is insufficient to provide these figures.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference correctly identifies the question as unanswerable: the 10-K mentions GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36 and B200 only in export-licensing context and gives no unit shipment or production counts. The candidate abstains with the same conclusion and correctly notes the products appear only qualitatively in the export-control discussion. Its accession number, filing date, and fiscal year end are supported by the tool output (accession 0001045810-25-000023, fiscal year ended January 26, 2025). Minor issues: the candidate says the mention is in Item 1A Risk Factors, while the gold evidence places it under Item 1 Business - Regulatory and Export Controls, so the section attribution is slightly off. The candidate also cites a filing date of February 26, 2025 that does not appear in the retrieved text shown, so that detail is not directly supported by the tool evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0584902, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0568905, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015997, "wall_seconds": 32.769702098999915, "api_seconds": 30.68690701900232, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 3, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 84916, "completion_tokens": 1387, "reasoning_tokens": 0, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 12800, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000037", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000052", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000334", "0001958244-25-001868" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/6eb059b80919ef5bd22fb8c6.json", "detail_js": "details/6eb059b80919ef5bd22fb8c6.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/6eb059b80919ef5bd22fb8c6.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/851471b1ff9d442687f3313d02a33023.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/bbc9f5942dc3483db31485054f526d1d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "2483cd8c777ffd514e33199d", "question_id": "Q096", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, exactly how many individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems and standalone B200 GPUs were manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers during fiscal year 2025?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K mentions Blackwell architecture systems (specifically GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36, and B200) exclusively in the context of US export licensing regulations and trade restrictions, and does not disclose specific unit shipment quantities, production counts, or customer delivery numbers for any Blackwell products.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s fiscal 2025 Form 10-K does **not** state an exact number of GB200 NVL72 rack systems or standalone B200 GPUs manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers. So the exact counts cannot be determined from that filing.\n\nThe filing is NVIDIA’s 10-K (file stem `0001045810-25-000023`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`). Its references to GB200 and B200 are in product and export-control discussion (for example, the GB200/B200 passage at parsed-text offset 53,418); they do not give shipment quantities.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as unanswerable because the 10-K mentions GB200 NVL72, NVL36, and B200 only in export-control contexts and gives no shipment or production counts. The candidate reaches the same abstention and correctly states that the filing does not give shipment quantities. Its citations match the tool output: file stem 0001045810-25-000023, file ID sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, and the GB200/B200 passage at offset 53,418. The tool evidence supports the abstention through keyword searches ('manufactured and shipped', 'units shipped', 'rack systems' and 'commercial cloud' all returned no match), though the candidate does not mention those checks or quote the export-control sentence. The score is slightly below full because the support rests on negative keyword searches rather than a complete read of the relevant sections.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002717785, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001539485, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011783, "wall_seconds": 30.259195524999086, "api_seconds": 28.035123058001773, "api_attempts": 8, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 7, "tool_requested": 6, "tool_processed": 6, "tool_dispatched": 6, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 38618, "completion_tokens": 1468, "reasoning_tokens": 453, "cache_read_tokens": 22636, "excerpt_characters": 4250, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/2483cd8c777ffd514e33199d.json", "detail_js": "details/2483cd8c777ffd514e33199d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/2483cd8c777ffd514e33199d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/97fcb87d64954314a0e1f080aec12a15.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d41fa46d67d741048582c75b26cb7200.request.json" }, { "task_id": "8c75816556db6ef36c2bd621", "question_id": "Q096", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to NVIDIA Corporation's fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, exactly how many individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems and standalone B200 GPUs were manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers during fiscal year 2025?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-K mentions Blackwell architecture systems (specifically GB200 NVL 72, NVL 36, and B200) exclusively in the context of US export licensing regulations and trade restrictions, and does not disclose specific unit shipment quantities, production counts, or customer delivery numbers for any Blackwell products.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "NVIDIA’s fiscal 2025 Form 10-K does **not state an exact number** of individual GB200 NVL72 rack systems or standalone B200 GPUs manufactured and shipped to commercial cloud customers. It identifies GB200 NVL72 and B200 as products, but the cited discussion provides no customer shipment counts (filing `0001045810-25-000023`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, characters 153,455–165,455). So an exact figure cannot be determined from the 10-K.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as unanswerable, and the candidate correctly abstains, saying the 10-K does not state an exact GB200 NVL72 or B200 shipment count. Its cited location (accession 0001045810-25-000023, sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet, characters 153,455–165,455) matches the tool output, and that passage mentions Blackwell only in export-license context. The 'not stated' conclusion rests on keyword searches ('commercial cloud', 'manufactured and shipped' returned nothing), not a full read of the filing, so it is slightly less certain than the reference's flat statement. The candidate's summary of the cited passage is accurate.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0034526500000000003, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00185695, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015957, "wall_seconds": 29.894863092000378, "api_seconds": 28.27963450199968, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 53250, "completion_tokens": 1062, "reasoning_tokens": 302, "cache_read_tokens": 29335, "excerpt_characters": 24000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000023" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001045810-25-000002", "0001045810-25-000007", "0001045810-25-000013", "0001045810-25-000014", "0001045810-25-000021", "0001045810-25-000023", "0001045810-25-000027", "0001045810-25-000035", "0001045810-25-000047", "0001045810-25-000049", "0001045810-25-000054", "0001045810-25-000056", "0001045810-25-000066", "0001045810-25-000068", "0001045810-25-000069", "0001045810-25-000070", "0001045810-25-000071", "0001045810-25-000072", "0001921094-25-000014", "0001921094-25-000334" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/8c75816556db6ef36c2bd621.json", "detail_js": "details/8c75816556db6ef36c2bd621.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/8c75816556db6ef36c2bd621.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c19e55dadac94f2d984d31a929e711f7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/98a56b6289d54055bfcee525a95a3f78.request.json" }, { "task_id": "dfd8bab819ff8b556cea6687", "question_id": "Q097", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "What is Alphabet Inc.'s projected revenue and net income guidance for fiscal year 2027 as provided in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K does not provide long-term quantitative financial guidance or projections for fiscal year 2027. The filing contains a standard cautionary disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 but explicitly refrains from issuing forward multi-year revenue or profit targets.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Alphabet Inc.'s fiscal year 2024 Form 10-K (filed February 5, 2025; Accession / file stem: `0001652044-25-000014`, CIK: `0001652044`), **Alphabet Inc. does not provide projected revenue or net income guidance for fiscal year 2027** (or multi-year forward financial targets). \n\nIn the filing:\n- References to the year **2027** relate to accounting pronouncements (e.g., Note 1, *Summary of Significant Accounting Policies*, noting that a FASB standard on income statement expense disclosures is effective for the 2027 annual period) and future lease payment commitments (e.g., Note 6, *Leases*, showing operating lease payments of $2,311 million and finance lease payments of $208 million due in 2027).\n- Alphabet does not include forward-looking revenue or net income guidance for fiscal year 2027.", "correctness": 88, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reaches the same conclusion as the reference: the 2024 Form 10-K gives no revenue or net income guidance for fiscal 2027, so it correctly abstains. Its supporting details check out against the tool outputs: accession 0001652044-25-000014, CIK 0001652044, filing date February 5, 2025, the 2027 operating lease payment of $2,311M and finance lease payment of $208M, and the FASB standard effective for the 2027 annual period. Two specifics are not shown in the tool evidence: the 'Note 1' and 'Note 6' labels, and the claim that the 2027 references are in those notes. The candidate also does not cite the gold forward-looking statements passage, though its conclusion is consistent with it. Correctness is high because the abstention matches the unanswerable reference; citation support is somewhat lower because of the unverified note labels.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0302881, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0292305, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010576, "wall_seconds": 32.753748999999516, "api_seconds": 30.426611004002552, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 40435, "completion_tokens": 1823, "reasoning_tokens": 386, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 2500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/dfd8bab819ff8b556cea6687.json", "detail_js": "details/dfd8bab819ff8b556cea6687.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/dfd8bab819ff8b556cea6687.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5063b84a0baa47609fe05e8e091d87e7.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/69c30c4a1e7243a19615fe015c0f9496.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d08947086f93fd2fe4a87f6b", "question_id": "Q097", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is Alphabet Inc.'s projected revenue and net income guidance for fiscal year 2027 as provided in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K does not provide long-term quantitative financial guidance or projections for fiscal year 2027. The filing contains a standard cautionary disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 but explicitly refrains from issuing forward multi-year revenue or profit targets.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Alphabet Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K (filing accession `0001652044-25-000014`, filed February 5, 2025, for the period ended December 31, 2024 in file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`):\n\n**Alphabet Inc. does not provide financial guidance for fiscal year 2027 (revenue or net income) in its 2024 Form 10-K.** \n\nIn the filing:\n- Occurrences of the year \"2027\" relate solely to accounting standards effective dates (e.g., Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies regarding standard updates effective for the 2027 annual period) and contractual/lease obligation schedules (e.g., operating and finance lease payment schedules for 2027).\n- No revenue or net income projections or forward-looking financial targets for fiscal year 2027 are provided.", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 80, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as unanswerable, and the candidate correctly abstains: it states that the 2024 10-K gives no FY2027 revenue or net income guidance. Its metadata (accession 0001652044-25-000014, filed 2025-02-05, period ended 2024-12-31) matches the tool output. Its description of the 2027 occurrences is supported by the snippets: an accounting standard effective for the 2027 annual period and a lease payment schedule with a 2027 row. Citation support is slightly weaker because the tool output never shows the 'Note 1' heading, and the 'no projections' conclusion rests on keyword positions rather than a full read of the filing. The 'guidance' hit at position 194076 was a tax-guidance passage, which the candidate did not address, though it does not change the conclusion.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0296007, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.02859, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010107, "wall_seconds": 33.68367550500079, "api_seconds": 31.107454688999496, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 39157, "completion_tokens": 1814, "reasoning_tokens": 436, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 1500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "invalid_tool_arguments", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d08947086f93fd2fe4a87f6b.json", "detail_js": "details/d08947086f93fd2fe4a87f6b.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d08947086f93fd2fe4a87f6b.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/2fc58ed61d8949d4b7964e2c0bf5b25f.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/36afc3c057624e9da834fc4547754d28.request.json" }, { "task_id": "084d7ec7eac6a73d5b791118", "question_id": "Q097", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "What is Alphabet Inc.'s projected revenue and net income guidance for fiscal year 2027 as provided in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K does not provide long-term quantitative financial guidance or projections for fiscal year 2027. The filing contains a standard cautionary disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 but explicitly refrains from issuing forward multi-year revenue or profit targets.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet’s 2024 Form 10-K does **not provide projected revenue or net income guidance for fiscal year 2027**. The filing identifies itself as Alphabet Inc.’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem **0001652044-25-000014**). Its reference to 2027 is about the effective date of an accounting-disclosure standard, not a financial forecast.\n\nSo, no FY2027 revenue or net income guidance figures can be reported from this filing.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 82, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate reaches the same conclusion as the reference: the 2024 Form 10-K provides no FY2027 revenue or net income guidance. It correctly identifies the filing (accession 0001652044-25-000014, fiscal year ended December 31, 2024) and correctly explains that the '2027' mention is the effective date of ASU 2024-03 for the company's 2027 annual period, which the tool excerpt directly supports. Citation support is somewhat less than complete: the '2027 revenue' search returned no hit, and the 'guidance' hit was not inspected, so the claim that no guidance exists rests partly on absence of search matches rather than a full read of the forward-looking or MD&A sections. The candidate also gives the abstention without citing the forward-looking-statements note the reference relies on, which is a minor completeness gap.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00259573, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00140883, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0011869, "wall_seconds": 27.85111044900077, "api_seconds": 26.417523334002908, "api_attempts": 7, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 6, "tool_requested": 5, "tool_processed": 5, "tool_dispatched": 5, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 32333, "completion_tokens": 1382, "reasoning_tokens": 523, "cache_read_tokens": 16513, "excerpt_characters": 4600, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/084d7ec7eac6a73d5b791118.json", "detail_js": "details/084d7ec7eac6a73d5b791118.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/084d7ec7eac6a73d5b791118.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/684a0fe221cb4a2784da95a7dd4d12f9.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/369b7abd93ea49aba9ff6518e6567748.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ac82d7f16ead6727c32ca467", "question_id": "Q097", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "What is Alphabet Inc.'s projected revenue and net income guidance for fiscal year 2027 as provided in its 2024 Form 10-K?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Alphabet Inc.'s Form 10-K does not provide long-term quantitative financial guidance or projections for fiscal year 2027. The filing contains a standard cautionary disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 but explicitly refrains from issuing forward multi-year revenue or profit targets.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Alphabet’s 2024 Form 10-K does **not** provide fiscal-year 2027 revenue or net-income guidance. It reports historical results through 2024 and discusses some expected timing for revenue backlog recognition, but that is not a 2027 revenue or net-income forecast.\n\nThe filing does say it expects to recognize approximately half of its **$93.2 billion** revenue backlog over the next 24 months; it does not present that as total-company revenue guidance. Source: Form 10-K, file stem `0001652044-25-000014`, file `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, passage returned at character offsets 282,884–294,884.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference says the question is unanswerable because the 10-K gives no FY2027 revenue or net income guidance. The candidate reaches the same conclusion. Its supporting details are accurate and traceable to the tool output: the $93.2B revenue backlog, the expectation to recognize about half over 24 months, and the file stem and character offsets 282,884–294,884 all match the retrieved passage. The candidate does not mention that the only 2027 reference in the retrieved text is an ASU 2024-03 effective-date note, which is not guidance but would have made the abstention more transparent. The tool evidence shows that the '2027' search hit is an accounting-standard date, which supports the absence of guidance but does not prove it on its own, so citation support is slightly below full.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00302332, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0015196200000000002, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0015037, "wall_seconds": 21.888130846000422, "api_seconds": 20.980273417999342, "api_attempts": 6, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 5, "tool_requested": 4, "tool_processed": 4, "tool_dispatched": 4, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 30183, "completion_tokens": 1291, "reasoning_tokens": 518, "cache_read_tokens": 9442, "excerpt_characters": 12000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001652044-25-000014" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000950170-25-000278", "0000950170-25-000324", "0000950170-25-000947", "0000950170-25-004285", "0000950170-25-004312", "0000950170-25-004355", "0000950170-25-004989", "0000950170-25-005957", "0000950170-25-008968", "0000950170-25-010076", "0000950170-25-010987", "0000950170-25-011901", "0000950170-25-022699", "0001652044-25-000014", "0001652044-25-000019", "0001921094-25-000079", "0001921094-25-000224", "0001950047-25-000534", "0001950047-25-000535", "0001973141-25-000015" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax" ], "detail_json": "details/ac82d7f16ead6727c32ca467.json", "detail_js": "details/ac82d7f16ead6727c32ca467.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ac82d7f16ead6727c32ca467.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/5c70bf79399044d28f935b70b28ae71d.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/232b768c060546838e5500e1040d1bc1.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c8e7813c6d51337bf094cb57", "question_id": "Q098", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was Amazon's total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Amazon.com, Inc. reports net sales aggregated on an annual basis ($637,959 million total in 2024, consisting of $272,311 million in net product sales and $365,648 million in net service sales) and quarterly segment disclosures, but does not report monthly breakdown of sales in its Form 10-K.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`), Amazon **does not report net sales for each individual calendar month** (January through December) of 2024. \n\nUnder U.S. GAAP and SEC Form 10-K reporting requirements, net sales are reported on an annual basis (and by segment, geographic region, and group of similar products and services), not by calendar month. In the Consolidated Statements of Operations (Item 8), Amazon reported total net sales for the full year 2024 as:\n\n- **Net product sales:** $272,311 million\n- **Net service sales:** $365,648 million\n- **Total net sales:** **$637,959 million** (for the Year Ended December 31, 2024)\n\nBecause monthly breakdowns of net sales are not provided in Form 10-K, the evidence is insufficient to state net sales for each individual calendar month.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 78, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the monthly question as unanswerable, and the candidate abstains. Its annual figures ($272,311M product, $365,648M service, $637,959M total for 2024) match the Consolidated Statements of Operations text in the tool output (call_283512) and the gold quote. The candidate correctly identifies the filing and file ID. Citation support is somewhat weaker: the claim that monthly sales are not reported rests on keyword searches (zero hits for 'calendar month'; 'monthly' appeared only in fee footnotes, which the candidate does not mention). The statement that GAAP and SEC rules require annual-only reporting is not drawn from the tool evidence. The conclusion is reasonable, but part of its support is inferred rather than shown.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0497117, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.048318, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013937, "wall_seconds": 41.69645514500007, "api_seconds": 37.30294019300345, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 66691, "completion_tokens": 2334, "reasoning_tokens": 1052, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c8e7813c6d51337bf094cb57.json", "detail_js": "details/c8e7813c6d51337bf094cb57.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c8e7813c6d51337bf094cb57.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/d1f3a712890c4997906c2a82918bdaf5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/f74283108e7c4be89346b18b9c6d9f48.request.json" }, { "task_id": "b754fee86ed7ab791a40c940", "question_id": "Q098", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was Amazon's total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Amazon.com, Inc. reports net sales aggregated on an annual basis ($637,959 million total in 2024, consisting of $272,311 million in net product sales and $365,648 million in net service sales) and quarterly segment disclosures, but does not report monthly breakdown of sales in its Form 10-K.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Based on Amazon.com, Inc.’s 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024; file stem `0001018724-25-000004`):\n\n### Net Sales Disclosed in the Filing\nIn the **Consolidated Statements of Operations** (Item 8, page 37), Amazon reports net sales on an **annual basis** (in millions):\n- **Net product sales:** $272,311 million\n- **Net service sales:** $365,648 million\n- **Total net sales for the year ended December 31, 2024:** **$637,959 million**\n\n### Monthly Net Sales\n**The 2024 Form 10-K does not disclose total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024.** In accordance with U.S. GAAP and SEC Form 10-K reporting requirements, financial statements present full-year consolidated results rather than individual monthly figures. Consequently, evidence to provide total net sales for each individual calendar month is not present in the filing.", "correctness": 92, "citation_support": 78, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate matches the reference: it correctly abstains on monthly net sales and reports the annual figures ($272,311M product, $365,648M service, $637,959M total) that match the Item 8 Consolidated Statements of Operations quoted in the tool output. The filing accession and page 37 are consistent with the evidence. Minor deductions: the claim that GAAP and SEC rules require full-year-only presentation is an overgeneralization not supported by the tool output. The tool checks were also incomplete. The searches for 'Quarterly Information' and 'Quarterly Financial Data' returned nothing, but 'January' and 'February' both appear in the parsed text (positions 5827 and 22001), and the candidate did not examine those hits before concluding no monthly figures exist. The non-disclosure conclusion is correct, but it is only partly verified by the retrieved evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.05128455, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.04870725, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025773, "wall_seconds": 37.27643790200091, "api_seconds": 33.54027880000103, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 4, "tool_worker_runs": 4, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 82706, "completion_tokens": 1602, "reasoning_tokens": 402, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 1, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/b754fee86ed7ab791a40c940.json", "detail_js": "details/b754fee86ed7ab791a40c940.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/b754fee86ed7ab791a40c940.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/875144a2fed74e2db4e942c8ea090d13.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/4c90bd0468024265bc0abf936215339a.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9280e5f7895b1003cc5effc9", "question_id": "Q098", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was Amazon's total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Amazon.com, Inc. reports net sales aggregated on an annual basis ($637,959 million total in 2024, consisting of $272,311 million in net product sales and $365,648 million in net service sales) and quarterly segment disclosures, but does not report monthly breakdown of sales in its Form 10-K.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon’s 2024 Form 10-K does **not** report total net sales separately for each calendar month, so the monthly amounts cannot be determined from that filing. It reports consolidated net sales for the **year ended December 31, 2024: $637,959 million**.\n\nEvidence: Amazon 2024 Form 10-K, file_stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file_id `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`; the consolidated net sales table gives $637,959 million for 2024 (SQL excerpt around character 288,000). The filing’s reported sales period is annual, not monthly.", "correctness": 95, "citation_support": 72, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference says monthly net sales are not disclosed in the 10-K, and the candidate correctly abstains on the monthly breakdown. It also gives the correct 2024 annual consolidated net sales of $637,959 million, which matches the reference and the gold table. Citation support is partial. The $637,959 million figure appears in the tool output (the excerpt near character 288,000), and the file_stem and file_id are correct. However, that excerpt is a geographic-sales table labeled 'Consolidated', not the Consolidated Statements of Operations the candidate describes. The tool evidence also never directly shows that no monthly breakdown exists. The absence claim rests on a limited search (keyword positions and a partial read) and is not directly verified in the retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.002950815, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.001619215, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013316, "wall_seconds": 32.967412856998635, "api_seconds": 30.106249403999755, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 41264, "completion_tokens": 1645, "reasoning_tokens": 693, "cache_read_tokens": 24099, "excerpt_characters": 5900, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id" ], "detail_json": "details/9280e5f7895b1003cc5effc9.json", "detail_js": "details/9280e5f7895b1003cc5effc9.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9280e5f7895b1003cc5effc9.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/c24b29629c8342d1b0966d186a5cff6a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/765fd96288db453094d2856ba48601e9.request.json" }, { "task_id": "e015466502a458cdbe9b3078", "question_id": "Q098", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Amazon.com, Inc.'s 2024 Form 10-K, what was Amazon's total net sales for each individual calendar month (January through December) of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Not disclosed. Amazon.com, Inc. reports net sales aggregated on an annual basis ($637,959 million total in 2024, consisting of $272,311 million in net product sales and $365,648 million in net service sales) and quarterly segment disclosures, but does not report monthly breakdown of sales in its Form 10-K.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Amazon’s 2024 Form 10-K does **not** provide total net sales broken out by individual calendar month, so monthly figures for January through December cannot be determined from the evidence returned.\n\nThe filing identifies Amazon.com, Inc. and its fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (file stem `0001018724-25-000004`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-02.parquet`, characters 826–12,826). It reports annual 2024 net sales of **$637,959 million** in an annual comparison table (same filing, characters 137,185–149,185), but that annual total does not establish sales for any individual month.", "correctness": 96, "citation_support": 82, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference deems the question unanswerable because the 10-K reports net sales only annually and quarterly, not monthly. The candidate abstains on the monthly breakdown, which matches. It also gives the $637,959 million annual total, which the gold quote and the tool output (the FX table in the 137,185–149,185 chunk) both confirm. The fiscal year end and filing identifiers are supported by the cover-page chunk. Citation support is slightly reduced because the claim that the filing 'does not provide' monthly sales rests on a limited set of needle searches that returned no quarterly table, and the cited 826–12,826 range is the cover page rather than the sales disclosure. The abstention itself is correct.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00677059, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00425179, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025188, "wall_seconds": 37.71466489799968, "api_seconds": 33.563363126000695, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 88650, "completion_tokens": 1536, "reasoning_tokens": 563, "cache_read_tokens": 39284, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0001018724-25-000002", "0001018724-25-000004", "0001018724-25-000006", "0001018724-25-000008", "0001018724-25-000010", "0001018724-25-000012", "0001018724-25-000014", "0001018724-25-000016", "0001018724-25-000018", "0001018724-25-000020", "0001018724-25-000024", "0001018724-25-000036", "0001104659-25-010572", "0001104659-25-010585", "0001104659-25-033442", "0001104659-25-033453", "0001950047-25-000777", "0001950047-25-001131", "0001959173-25-001235", "0001959173-25-001237", "0001959173-25-001264", "0002007317-25-000181", "0002007317-25-000194" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/e015466502a458cdbe9b3078.json", "detail_js": "details/e015466502a458cdbe9b3078.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/e015466502a458cdbe9b3078.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/9b35f368cb9a4675b1b94629c4de459a.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b5846b0e0ff84fd18ed6c1f73c575c8d.request.json" }, { "task_id": "9ef6ac0a67ccbceb11e9a62d", "question_id": "Q099", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the dividend per share amount paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / No dividend paid. Intel Corporation suspended its quarterly common stock dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and therefore paid $0.00 dividend per share for Q4 2024. Furthermore, Intel agreed under its commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the subsequent two years.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, file ID `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), the dividend per share amount paid/declared to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024 was **$0.00** (no dividend was paid/declared), as the company suspended dividend declarations starting in the fourth quarter of 2024.\n\n### Evidence from the Filing:\n1. **MD&A – Capital Allocation Strategy / Return Excess Cash to Stockholders** (offsets ~35,600–36,000):\n > \"Our capital allocation strategy historically included returning excess cash to stockholders through dividends and stock repurchases. Our most recent stock repurchase was in the first quarter of 2021 and **we suspended the declaration of quarterly dividends starting with the fourth quarter of 2024**. We agreed under our commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the next two years, and agreed to limitations on the payment of dividends for the three years thereafter.\"\n\n2. **Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity** (page 61, offsets ~344,000–345,500):\n * For fiscal year 2024, total cash dividends declared were **$0.38 per share of common stock** (representing the first three quarters of 2024: $0.125 + $0.125 + $0.125 = $0.375 / $0.38 rounded total, with $0 declared/paid for Q4 2024).", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 70, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer of $0.00 for Q4 2024 matches the reference's substantive conclusion that the quarterly dividend was suspended in Q4 2024. The reference's 'Unanswerable' label conflicts with its own $0.00 answer, so the candidate is not penalized for failing to abstain. The quoted MD&A passage and the $0.38 full-year cash dividends declared figure are verbatim in the tool output. However, the claimed '$0.125 + $0.125 + $0.125' quarterly amounts appear nowhere in the retrieved evidence, and the arithmetic explanation ('$0.375 / $0.38 rounded total') is muddled. The candidate also cites the Item 5 dividend section only indirectly, through MD&A, and the gold quote's 'forgo paying dividends' language is not directly shown in its evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0335345, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0321075, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.001427, "wall_seconds": 34.813974591999795, "api_seconds": 32.23494261999804, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 47170, "completion_tokens": 1982, "reasoning_tokens": 531, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7999, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/9ef6ac0a67ccbceb11e9a62d.json", "detail_js": "details/9ef6ac0a67ccbceb11e9a62d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/9ef6ac0a67ccbceb11e9a62d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/b199c7cc3be24023addfdbe4f9581f53.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/04125118494e4fd681254d3e49d9a162.request.json" }, { "task_id": "ded1cd4ca972f3e553634b80", "question_id": "Q099", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the dividend per share amount paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / No dividend paid. Intel Corporation suspended its quarterly common stock dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and therefore paid $0.00 dividend per share for Q4 2024. Furthermore, Intel agreed under its commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the subsequent two years.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Intel Corporation’s 2024 Form 10-K (filed January 31, 2025; file stem `0000050863-25-000009`, `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`), under **\"Return Excess Cash to Stockholders\"**:\n\n> \"Our most recent stock repurchase was in the first quarter of 2021 and **we suspended the declaration of quarterly dividends starting with the fourth quarter of 2024**. We agreed under our commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the next two years, and agreed to limitations on the payment of dividends for the three years thereafter.\"\n\nBecause the declaration of quarterly dividends was suspended starting with the fourth quarter of 2024, the dividend per share paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024 was **$0.00** (no dividend was declared or paid).", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate's core answer, $0.00 for Q4 2024 because quarterly dividend declarations were suspended starting Q4 2024, matches the reference's substance. The reference is internally muddled: it labels the question unanswerable, then gives $0.00. The candidate's quoted language matches the tool output verbatim, and the filing date and accession are supported by the header retrieved. The candidate slightly overreaches by stating that no dividend was 'paid', since the filing only says declarations were suspended. The CHIPS Act dividend restriction is also correctly cited.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0419555, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.039693, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022625, "wall_seconds": 34.61057842400078, "api_seconds": 33.10970219999945, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 1, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 67239, "completion_tokens": 1662, "reasoning_tokens": 520, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 25000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000054", "0000050863-25-000074" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/ded1cd4ca972f3e553634b80.json", "detail_js": "details/ded1cd4ca972f3e553634b80.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/ded1cd4ca972f3e553634b80.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/8dcbd110b19140d58a171a7276a0a007.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/34327a9d97434baaba44cb0798874f06.request.json" }, { "task_id": "bd75f8981bf49c6980efc301", "question_id": "Q099", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the dividend per share amount paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / No dividend paid. Intel Corporation suspended its quarterly common stock dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and therefore paid $0.00 dividend per share for Q4 2024. Furthermore, Intel agreed under its commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the subsequent two years.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "Intel paid a dividend of **$0.12 per common share** in the fourth quarter of 2024. The 10-K notes that Intel suspended *declaring* quarterly dividends starting in Q4; that is distinct from the dividend paid during the quarter. Evidence: Intel’s 2024 Form 10-K, filing `0000050863-25-000009` in `sfd-v1-2025-01.parquet`; the filing says dividends were suspended “starting with the fourth quarter of 2024” (SQL excerpt at character 35,933).", "correctness": 5, "citation_support": 15, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference answer is $0.00 paid for Q4 2024, because Intel suspended its quarterly dividend starting in Q4 2024. The candidate instead asserts a $0.12 per-share dividend paid in Q4 2024, which contradicts the reference. The candidate's own tool evidence does not support the $0.12 figure: the search for '$0.12' returned position 0 and only the filing header, meaning the string was not found in the filing. The quoted suspension language ('starting with the fourth quarter of 2024') is accurate and supports the reference, but the candidate reads it as a suspension of declarations only, while still reporting a payment amount. The $0.12 figure is unsupported and the answer is wrong.", "known_cost_usd": 0.003116, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0017888000000000001, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013272, "wall_seconds": 32.790666163000424, "api_seconds": 31.02011572399715, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 6, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 44716, "completion_tokens": 1746, "reasoning_tokens": 677, "cache_read_tokens": 26735, "excerpt_characters": 6500, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000004", "0000050863-25-000009", "0000050863-25-000011", "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/bd75f8981bf49c6980efc301.json", "detail_js": "details/bd75f8981bf49c6980efc301.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/bd75f8981bf49c6980efc301.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/e43991d4530d4a898250db8a525c9b72.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/da0c0de3562344f5aeddd9179a4358b0.request.json" }, { "task_id": "c82a92b261c42ff0ca28205d", "question_id": "Q099", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Intel Corporation's 2024 Form 10-K, what was the dividend per share amount paid to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of 2024?", "reference": "Unanswerable / No dividend paid. Intel Corporation suspended its quarterly common stock dividend beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and therefore paid $0.00 dividend per share for Q4 2024. Furthermore, Intel agreed under its commercial CHIPS Act agreement to forgo paying dividends for the subsequent two years.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The filing says Intel suspended quarterly dividend declarations starting with Q4 2024, but the returned excerpts do not state the per-share amount paid to common stockholders for that quarter. The evidence is insufficient to give that amount.", "correctness": 45, "citation_support": 85, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference concludes $0.00 paid for Q4 2024 because Intel suspended its quarterly dividend, and the gold quote supports that suspension. The candidate correctly identifies the suspension and the CHIPS Act dividend restrictions, which the tool evidence supports. However, it abstains on the amount instead of concluding $0.00, which the suspension evidence supports. Its claim that the excerpts lack a per-share amount is accurate, but it does not draw the implied conclusion. The reference is mixed (unanswerable framing plus a $0.00 answer), so full abstention credit does not apply. Citation support is high because the candidate's statements about the suspension match the retrieved text.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00608856, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00386006, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0022285, "wall_seconds": 29.89807951399962, "api_seconds": 27.864205841000512, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 87683, "completion_tokens": 1160, "reasoning_tokens": 418, "cache_read_tokens": 43101, "excerpt_characters": 36000, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000009" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000050863-25-000021", "0000050863-25-000024", "0000050863-25-000036", "0000050863-25-000037", "0000050863-25-000052", "0000050863-25-000057", "0000050863-25-000060", "0000950172-25-000078", "0001127602-25-002788", "0001127602-25-002791", "0001127602-25-002792", "0001127602-25-002793", "0001127602-25-002794", "0001127602-25-002795", "0001127602-25-002796", "0001127602-25-002797", "0001127602-25-007568", "0001127602-25-007570", "0001127602-25-007572", "0001127602-25-010150" ], "expected_filing_recall": 0.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/c82a92b261c42ff0ca28205d.json", "detail_js": "details/c82a92b261c42ff0ca28205d.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/c82a92b261c42ff0ca28205d.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/71b8af404ff84da6a7d5ada6655db9c2.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6ad721533e024b178967bc52c584cf13.request.json" }, { "task_id": "d729f9b1ed8631d4773463de", "question_id": "Q100", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, what was the final completed cash purchase price paid by Adobe to acquire Figma, Inc.?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Transaction terminated. Adobe Inc. never completed the acquisition of Figma, Inc. The merger agreement was mutually terminated in December 2023 due to regulatory obstacles, and instead Adobe paid Figma a $1,000 million ($1 billion) acquisition termination fee, as shown on its Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K (file stem `0000796343-25-000004`, filed January 13, 2025):\n\n**Adobe did not complete the acquisition of Figma, Inc., so no purchase price was paid to acquire Figma.**\n\n### Relevant Details from the Filing:\n* **Proposed Acquisition:** On September 15, 2022, Adobe entered into a definitive merger agreement intending to acquire Figma, Inc. for approximately $20 billion (comprised of approximately half cash and half stock).\n* **Termination & Fee:** On December 17, 2023, Adobe and Figma entered into a mutual termination agreement to terminate the proposed merger. \n* **Termination Payment:** Pursuant to the termination agreement, Adobe paid Figma a **$1 billion termination fee** during fiscal 2024 (recorded in operating expenses), rather than an acquisition purchase price.", "correctness": 88, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states that Adobe never completed the Figma acquisition, so no completed purchase price exists. This matches the reference's core conclusion. It also gives the $1 billion termination fee, the December 17, 2023 mutual termination, and the fiscal 2024 timing, all of which the tool outputs support. The reference's 'Unanswerable' label is somewhat inconsistent with its own statement that a $1,000 million fee was paid, but the candidate handles that nuance well. Its claim that the fee was recorded in operating expenses is supported by the tool output (the Note 3 text). The candidate does not cite the income-statement table line that the gold evidence uses, so it loses a few points on that. The filing date and accession number are confirmed by the header in the tool output.", "known_cost_usd": 0.0359286, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0346245, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0013041, "wall_seconds": 123.40467937799986, "api_seconds": 121.61471250599425, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 50822, "completion_tokens": 1677, "reasoning_tokens": 298, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 7729, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000048", "0000796343-25-000050", "0000796343-25-000059", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001628280-25-019665" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "sql_schema_or_syntax", "memory_limit_or_allocation", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/d729f9b1ed8631d4773463de.json", "detail_js": "details/d729f9b1ed8631d4773463de.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/d729f9b1ed8631d4773463de.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/a8e9c9fc58ed4b0299bd8bbd7adcd92e.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/cf59a72ef0de48e19dacd3651241f01c.request.json" }, { "task_id": "00cc7f10521ea1e8ae9c4e86", "question_id": "Q100", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash", "provider": "google-ai-studio", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, what was the final completed cash purchase price paid by Adobe to acquire Figma, Inc.?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Transaction terminated. Adobe Inc. never completed the acquisition of Figma, Inc. The merger agreement was mutually terminated in December 2023 due to regulatory obstacles, and instead Adobe paid Figma a $1,000 million ($1 billion) acquisition termination fee, as shown on its Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K (for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024), **Adobe did not complete the acquisition of Figma, Inc.** Therefore, there was no completed purchase price. \n\n### Key Details from the Filing:\n* **Proposed Acquisition:** On September 15, 2022, Adobe entered into a definitive merger agreement under which it intended to acquire Figma, Inc. for approximately **$20 billion** (comprising approximately half cash and half stock).\n* **Termination:** On December 17, 2023, Adobe and Figma entered into a mutual termination agreement to terminate the proposed merger. \n* **Termination Fee Paid:** In accordance with the terms of the termination agreement, Adobe paid Figma a **$1 billion** cash termination fee (recorded in operating expenses during fiscal 2024).\n\n*(Source: Adobe Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 29, 2024, Item 7 \"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations\" and Note 3 \"Acquisitions\" to the Consolidated Financial Statements).*", "correctness": 90, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The candidate correctly states that Adobe never completed the Figma acquisition, so no completed purchase price exists. This matches the reference's unanswerable framing. It also correctly reports the $1 billion termination fee, the roughly $20 billion intended deal size with half cash and half stock, the December 17, 2023 mutual termination, and the fee's recording in operating expenses. Each of these is supported by the retrieved Note 3 text and the MD&A snippets. The candidate cites Item 7 and Note 3, which the tool outputs support. It does not repeat the reference's unsupported claim about regulatory obstacles, and it does not cite the income-statement line item the gold evidence uses. Those are minor gaps, not errors.", "known_cost_usd": 0.046894899999999996, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.0443685, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0025264, "wall_seconds": 112.74176422000164, "api_seconds": 111.45209308899757, "api_attempts": 9, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 8, "tool_requested": 7, "tool_processed": 7, "tool_dispatched": 7, "tool_cache_hits": 2, "tool_worker_runs": 5, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": false, "prompt_tokens": 77072, "completion_tokens": 1470, "reasoning_tokens": 488, "cache_read_tokens": 0, "excerpt_characters": 30256, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [], "detail_json": "details/00cc7f10521ea1e8ae9c4e86.json", "detail_js": "details/00cc7f10521ea1e8ae9c4e86.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/00cc7f10521ea1e8ae9c4e86.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/82d526f719df4815baf132641a5b7506.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/6dc6e7986adf43e0a933b6661fe66056.request.json" }, { "task_id": "7bc958789d6f168b1056a685", "question_id": "Q100", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql", "question": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, what was the final completed cash purchase price paid by Adobe to acquire Figma, Inc.?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Transaction terminated. Adobe Inc. never completed the acquisition of Figma, Inc. The merger agreement was mutually terminated in December 2023 due to regulatory obstacles, and instead Adobe paid Figma a $1,000 million ($1 billion) acquisition termination fee, as shown on its Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The available evidence confirms that Adobe incurred a **$1 billion Figma termination fee** in fiscal 2024, but it does not establish a final completed **cash purchase price paid to acquire Figma**. The filing passage retrieved is about the termination fee, not a completed acquisition purchase price, so I can’t provide the requested purchase price from the evidence available.", "correctness": 80, "citation_support": 92, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as unanswerable because the Figma acquisition was terminated and Adobe paid a $1 billion termination fee. The candidate abstains on the purchase price, which matches that conclusion, and correctly identifies the $1 billion Figma termination fee in fiscal 2024. It is less complete than the reference: it never states that the merger was terminated or gives the December 2023 date, and it does not name the Consolidated Statements of Income as the source. Its claims are supported by the tool output, which shows the '$1 billion Figma termination fee incurred in fiscal 2024' and the 'Acquisition termination fee | 1000' context. It does not overstate what the evidence shows.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00366487, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00242837, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0012365, "wall_seconds": 131.2737679189995, "api_seconds": 129.48013425900172, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 1, "tool_worker_runs": 7, "tool_errors": 0, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 46668, "completion_tokens": 1637, "reasoning_tokens": 528, "cache_read_tokens": 23812, "excerpt_characters": 3400, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000013", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000026", "0000796343-25-000027", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000030", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000036", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/7bc958789d6f168b1056a685.json", "detail_js": "details/7bc958789d6f168b1056a685.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/7bc958789d6f168b1056a685.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7c77a7d6ad12486b802497f3b3a22da5.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/7be43bfae26e48a281f96be03f93a102.request.json" }, { "task_id": "303c34852ff3d9775f2e3102", "question_id": "Q100", "difficulty": "unanswerable", "answer_type": "unanswerable", "model": "openai/gpt-6-luna", "provider": "openai", "method": "sql_streaming", "question": "According to Adobe Inc.'s fiscal 2024 Form 10-K, what was the final completed cash purchase price paid by Adobe to acquire Figma, Inc.?", "reference": "Unanswerable / Transaction terminated. Adobe Inc. never completed the acquisition of Figma, Inc. The merger agreement was mutually terminated in December 2023 due to regulatory obstacles, and instead Adobe paid Figma a $1,000 million ($1 billion) acquisition termination fee, as shown on its Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2024.", "status": "ok", "error": null, "answer": "The returned evidence is insufficient to determine the final completed cash purchase price. The Adobe filing text was not successfully retrieved, so I can’t verify the amount or cite supporting filing text.", "correctness": 75, "citation_support": 90, "judge_model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5", "judge_provider": "Anthropic", "judge_rationale": "The reference treats the question as unanswerable because the Figma acquisition was terminated and never completed, with a $1,000M termination fee instead. The candidate abstains, which matches the reference's unanswerable status, and it makes no false factual claims. It does not identify the false premise (no completed acquisition) or mention the termination fee, so it is only mostly correct. Its statement that the Adobe filing text could not be retrieved is supported by the tool outputs, which show duplicate-accession errors and empty search results, and it cites no unsupported evidence.", "known_cost_usd": 0.00311721, "unknown_cost_attempts": 0, "answer_known_cost_usd": 0.00207171, "judge_known_cost_usd": 0.0010455, "wall_seconds": 132.27018335200046, "api_seconds": 131.86759972699656, "api_attempts": 10, "api_failed_attempts": 0, "model_rounds": 9, "tool_requested": 8, "tool_processed": 8, "tool_dispatched": 8, "tool_cache_hits": 5, "tool_worker_runs": 3, "tool_errors": 2, "tool_budget_rejected": 0, "budget_exhausted": true, "prompt_tokens": 41463, "completion_tokens": 1520, "reasoning_tokens": 631, "cache_read_tokens": 22816, "excerpt_characters": 0, "expected_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000004" ], "observed_filing_ids": [ "0000796343-25-000002", "0000796343-25-000004", "0000796343-25-000012", "0000796343-25-000014", "0000796343-25-000015", "0000796343-25-000016", "0000796343-25-000017", "0000796343-25-000018", "0000796343-25-000028", "0000796343-25-000029", "0000796343-25-000031", "0000796343-25-000032", "0000796343-25-000038", "0001193125-25-005371", "0001193125-25-005830", "0001193125-25-006212", "0001193125-25-007129", "0001193125-25-008409", "0001950047-25-000424", "0001972362-25-000038" ], "expected_filing_recall": 1.0, "exact_gold_quotes_observed": 0, "gold_quote_count": 1, "flags": [ "duplicate_filing_id", "tool_budget_reached" ], "detail_json": "details/303c34852ff3d9775f2e3102.json", "detail_js": "details/303c34852ff3d9775f2e3102.js", "result_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/results/303c34852ff3d9775f2e3102.json", "final_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/0e4ab94e281b470bbbeb19c3bdd6dcda.request.json", "judge_request_file": "reports-whole-data/all100/raw/60dc419f3b3449f1bdec249ac664280c.request.json" } ] }